These vaccines are not FDA approved. They are under emergency use authorization only. The studies for all coronavirus vaccines are still open and are not due to conclude until at least next year. They are still collecting the data. Therefore, these vaccines are technically considered experimental. Under US informed consent regulations based upon the Nuremberg Code and Helsinki, a person has the right to refuse to participate in medical experimentation. There is no way that any health care provider can claim that these vaccines are safe or effective. Those FDA studies are not completed and any claims are preliminary.
To refuse is not being an antivaxer - it is exercising your right to informed consent. In addition, any non healthcare employer is not qualified to give advise as to the risks and benefits of any medically related issue and to do so is practicing medicine without a license and is illegal. This woman has one hell of a lawsuit if she gets the right attorney who understands these facts.
It does not matter what this stuff is technically called that they are trying to poison us with. The bottom line for this woman and for us is the fact that whatever it is called it is still experimental and that is the grounds for refusal - not whether it is called a vaccine, gene therapy, chemotherapy, or drug therapy. This poison is generally understood to be a vaccine by the bulk of the population and is outlined by the CDC as vaccine therapy for COVID-19 and that is what it is classified as under the Emergency Authorization Act by the FDA. These are the definitions as put forward within the system that we are stuck fighting at the moment.
We can argue the minutia on forums like this till we are blue in the face while the machine continues to roll us over and restrict our freedoms. These differences in the semantics do no good for the person desperate to keep a job in order to feed their families and keep a roof over their heads. We can argue with that all day long about definitions, but that is not going to help us much on the battlefield when we are fighting for our life.
Our arguments need get to the point and hit everyone in the chain, from the practitioner to the auxiliaries legally operating within their scope of practice under the supervision of the practionioner. Those responsibilities are defined by each state's medical and dental practice acts and can vary by each state. So, to argue over whether a person jabbing you in the arm has the legal right is futile. We cannot be trying to strain knats and miss the bus in our arguments. By law, both international and US, we have the right to refuse to participate in any medical experiment because of informed consent. It is really that simple.
The problem here is that we can play semantics all day long over what this technically is or is not, but that is not going to help the person trying to keep their job and not be poisoned as a requirement to stay employed. Whatever this is by definition that they are trying to give us is still an experiment. We have the right by law, both US and International Law, to refuse to participate in any medical experiment by informed consent. Americans need to figure this out because it will probably be the only leg they are going to be able to stand on with regards tp refusal right where they live. Remember, employers are not necessarily the brightest crayons in the box either, but, they can smell a good law suit when they see it. The risk of getting hit with multiple law suits over forcing someone by coercion to participate in medical experimentation may be the hammer we need to get them to think twice - not whether this thing is called a vaccine or gene therapy.
Here is an interesting conundrum. If we are to believe all this talk about Maritime Law and that each person when born is a vessel that is docked, given a SS number to tax their labor, and is registered at birth to be considered chattel, then an unborn baby really is the only truly free entity that exists. They must destroy what they cannot control.
Pregnant women are supposed to avoid nearly all medications because of the unknown effects it could have on the baby. Even with things like aspirin you have to be careful.
PLEASE NY help your people out.!Start the case for no forced vaccines. What a choice lose your job or long term potential damage to your baby. This is not really a choice!. Legitimate reason to refuse an untested in pregnancy, emergency use vaccine. This is a decision between a patient and doctor. To use the pro-abortion supporters words back at them.
Please read my comments above. We have the right to refuse under legal informed consent. US and International Law states that any person has the right to refuse to participate in medical experimentation. These "vaccines" are only FDA approved under the Emergency Authorization Act. They are experimental because the studies are still under way - the claim cannot be made that they are either safe or effective. Any claims to either are only preliminary.
The general public has been commandeered to participate in this huge medical experiment and they are counting on our ignorance. Any person given this "vaccine" must sign informed consent. The problem is that the benefits and risks cannot be advised in order to truly give informed consent because that is still being determined. This is the area we need to challenge because they cannot make any claims as to the safety or efficacy of the "vaccine" they want to give you - it is still being evaluated and is therefore an experiment. We have the legal right to refuse to participate in a medical experiment. A person cannot be coerced under threat of unemployment, or any other means of coercion, to participate in medical experimentation. Until the FDA changes the classification, this is the backbone of our argument and the basis for lawsuits. Hopefully, if this legal argument can gain some momentum, employers will be forced to back down or run the risk of lawsuits. They are not going to be able to wrangle out of this one because of decades of legal precedent in this area.
I’m in her boat. She isn’t currently pregnant. That would make it slightly easier to fight. She wants to get pregnant.
The fear is that the vax will attack embryos and destroy their ability to carry to term. I can’t think of anything sadder than my fiancé and I trying to have children and me to suffer miscarriage after miscarriage because my body attacks the fetus like a virus.
You have the right to refuse any medical experimentation by law - both US and International law based on the Nuremberg Code and Helsinki. These "vaccines" are medical experimentation. This is why they are covered under Emergency Use Authorization by the FDA and not regular FDA approval. The distribution has been quick because of the bypassing of all the normal protocols used to gain FDA approval that can take years. (Sorry, not a big fan of Trump's Warp Speed that paved the way for this genocide.)
The previous animal experiments when this "vaccine" technology was used proved disasterous which under normal circumstances would have put a halt to any further trials. This was bypassed. With the public rollout, the studies regarding safely and efficacy are still ongoing. The general public is part of the experiment. They cannot make any claims as to the safely or the efficacy of this experiment. Therefore, this is the grounds under which you can refuse by informed consent.
If employers start to realize that this avenue may be the legal groundwork by which they may be subjected to multiple lawsuits if they try to force their employees to comply, we may be able to stop the madness - at least temporarily while these "vaccines" are still under EUA. Drug companies are released from all liability and smart lawyers are going to find ways to nail someone when the real damages start to occur. Larger companies are already exploring this area because they do not want to be sued either from making vaccination a condition of employment, or when employees start to sue them because they were forced and then suffered damages. Lawsuits are the language of motivation for corporations.
Educate yourself with this information and those you care about. We are not going to be successful in educating others if we just come off as antivaxxers. Our arguments must be legally sound and simple. We cannot be compelled to participate in medical experimentation.
Please read my other comments in this thread above. There is the legal basis for refusal under unformed consent laws. We must stop this at the employer level and not have to file lawsuits. They take time to resolve and that does a person no good when they are trying to keep a roof over their head and feed their families.
He body, her choice as "they" say. She needs a good lawyer to take her case.
The demoncrates say it's ok to kill a baby but you are unable to save or protect a child's life. What is happening to the world?
We need DJT to come back ASAP.
I do not consent to wearing a mask, complying with unlawful mandates, and any requirement to take experimental unproven non-medically necessary vaccines.
No one has ever asked for my consent to wear them as is required for any medical procedure or practice.
I haven't been given informed consent as to the effectiveness of masks.
Show me the peer-reviewed studies with multiple repeatedly tested results in clinical trials showing the effectiveness of all types of masks and materials typically worn stopping viruses! Better yet, show me studies prior to January 2020 and the Covid-19 "Pandemic" so that I know they weren't funded to push a mask wearing agenda! I bet that's real difficult to do.
Dr Fauci is now a proven liar and fraud as he is on the record stating masks are ineffective due to people adjusting them too much, seen not wearing them multiple times despite telling the American people that we should, and then saying 2 masks are better than one.
Here's the paper Dr Fraudci co-authored detailing the bacterial infections during the Spanish Flu because people wore useless masks that created a warm moist breeding ground.
Click the PDF button to download.
https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/198/7/962/2192118
You want to use the fraudulent and phony death count numbers to scare me into wearing a mask? Dr Fauci failed to provide adequate information seeing as he was the head of the NIH in 2005 when a paper detailing the effectiveness of Chloroquine against Coronavirus/SARS. That means he is directly responsible for all of those deaths and the Mainstream Media as well for their willful discrediting of HCQ as a CHEAP and EFFECTIVE treatment method for treating Covid-19.
2005 NIH study:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
Of course if it's Cheap then you can't make money on the treatment and all the unnecessary masks you want to sell. If HCQ is effective, you can't scare the public into staying home so you can push for mail-in voting and The Great Reset.
Forcing masks is a violation of the Nuremberg Code and a Human Rights violation.
The US is a signatory of the Nuremberg Code and the 2005 UNESCO update. The US and the major nations of the world made the Nuremberg Code after seeing the medical experiments and atrocities of the Nazi's.
A VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE UNESCO 2005 STATEMENT ON BIOETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 6, section 1:
Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE or prejudice. (caps mine)
Article 6, section 3:
In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
Let's go over these.
Article 6, section 1:
Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information.
No one has asked for my consent!
No one has given me adequate information!
In fact, myself and millions like me have had to do our own research and share it with risk to being deplatformed from our social media accounts for 'mis-information' and 'Violating Community Standards' because that factual and sourced information goes against the deliberate lies and propoganda of the WHO and CDC.
"The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice."
I have never stated that I give my consent to wear a mask in order to shop, work, travel, or anything else necessary to live my life. Even if I had, the term WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE means I can revoke that consent at any time for any reason and there is nothing anyone can do about it!
Read this again carefully.
Article 6, section 3:
In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
The CDC and WHO guidelines DO NOT overrule my informed consent regardless of their status as a "community leader!" No one has that authority! Anyone forcing any mandate (or vaccine) upon your person without your consent is guilty of Human Rights Abuse and should be treated accordingly. I will take all measures including self defense to protect my bodily autonomy and human rights as needed.
Remember that it is against the law to discriminate against someone for a medical condition including a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Being "healthy" is the default medical condition and they have no evidence otherwise you aren't therefore they cannot force you to wear a mask.
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The risks of Covid-19 to me are low due to my own blood type, O-Positive.
"One of the largest data sets on the topic comes from the genetic testing company 23andMe, which has surveyed over a million people since April. The company’s survey data shows that people with type O blood are 9% to 18% less likely to test positive for COVID-19 than people with other blood types."
Shortly after 23andMe released their initial findings highlighting the protective effect of type O blood on June 8, a group of Harvard Medical School Researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital corroborated that people with type O were less likely to test positive for COVID-19.
You mandate I must take a CBT annually on Bloodborne Pathogens including Hepatitis yet you do not mandate the Hepatitis Vaccines!
Therefore you have no standing to dictate I wear a mask or recieve a Covid-19 Vaccine.
I am more likely to drop a heavy object on my floor or have an ergonomic lift injury yet you do not mandate or subsidize safety toe footwear or ergonomic awareness CBTs. These were mandatory when I was in the US Air Force!
Her next call should be to the NY Dept. of Labor, then to a good attorney.
Wrong order. Hire the mouthpiece first. You'll need it. Let it do the talking.
These vaccines are not FDA approved. They are under emergency use authorization only. The studies for all coronavirus vaccines are still open and are not due to conclude until at least next year. They are still collecting the data. Therefore, these vaccines are technically considered experimental. Under US informed consent regulations based upon the Nuremberg Code and Helsinki, a person has the right to refuse to participate in medical experimentation. There is no way that any health care provider can claim that these vaccines are safe or effective. Those FDA studies are not completed and any claims are preliminary.
To refuse is not being an antivaxer - it is exercising your right to informed consent. In addition, any non healthcare employer is not qualified to give advise as to the risks and benefits of any medically related issue and to do so is practicing medicine without a license and is illegal. This woman has one hell of a lawsuit if she gets the right attorney who understands these facts.
It does not matter what this stuff is technically called that they are trying to poison us with. The bottom line for this woman and for us is the fact that whatever it is called it is still experimental and that is the grounds for refusal - not whether it is called a vaccine, gene therapy, chemotherapy, or drug therapy. This poison is generally understood to be a vaccine by the bulk of the population and is outlined by the CDC as vaccine therapy for COVID-19 and that is what it is classified as under the Emergency Authorization Act by the FDA. These are the definitions as put forward within the system that we are stuck fighting at the moment.
We can argue the minutia on forums like this till we are blue in the face while the machine continues to roll us over and restrict our freedoms. These differences in the semantics do no good for the person desperate to keep a job in order to feed their families and keep a roof over their heads. We can argue with that all day long about definitions, but that is not going to help us much on the battlefield when we are fighting for our life.
Our arguments need get to the point and hit everyone in the chain, from the practitioner to the auxiliaries legally operating within their scope of practice under the supervision of the practionioner. Those responsibilities are defined by each state's medical and dental practice acts and can vary by each state. So, to argue over whether a person jabbing you in the arm has the legal right is futile. We cannot be trying to strain knats and miss the bus in our arguments. By law, both international and US, we have the right to refuse to participate in any medical experiment because of informed consent. It is really that simple.
Great info! Thanks for sharing, Vaccinefag!
u/#Benderneat
This is what the Left might call a passive abortion.
A eugenics program for sure. I hope this article helped to gain some support for this young mother so she can safely deliver her child.
There is no such thing legally as a Covid-19 Vaccine! It doesn't meet the definition requirements. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02/joseph-mercola/covid-19-mrna-shots-are-legally-not-vaccines/
The problem here is that we can play semantics all day long over what this technically is or is not, but that is not going to help the person trying to keep their job and not be poisoned as a requirement to stay employed. Whatever this is by definition that they are trying to give us is still an experiment. We have the right by law, both US and International Law, to refuse to participate in any medical experiment by informed consent. Americans need to figure this out because it will probably be the only leg they are going to be able to stand on with regards tp refusal right where they live. Remember, employers are not necessarily the brightest crayons in the box either, but, they can smell a good law suit when they see it. The risk of getting hit with multiple law suits over forcing someone by coercion to participate in medical experimentation may be the hammer we need to get them to think twice - not whether this thing is called a vaccine or gene therapy.
NY DOL will not be on her side
In that case, securing a good attorney first would be the right move.
She better avoid the democrat impeachment team of lawyers
Some of our lawyers have not exactly been stellar either.
Whatever happened to my body my choice?
And it doesn't make sense even then. Killing someone else's body takes it out of the realm of just being "your body".
Here is an interesting conundrum. If we are to believe all this talk about Maritime Law and that each person when born is a vessel that is docked, given a SS number to tax their labor, and is registered at birth to be considered chattel, then an unborn baby really is the only truly free entity that exists. They must destroy what they cannot control.
That’s only to murder babies, she is trying to save hers so it doesn’t count.
Forced vaccination is rape.
Honestly tho. You ensure that you’d recover. Who KNOWS what’s going to happen in a years time. Best case scenario, it’s the new flu shot.
It is only your body when it suits their arguments.
Suing time!
We should find out a way to help her out financially. I mean shit! A PREGNANT WAITRESS IN New York!!??
That's like... a total cliche, man
She should tell them to talk to the DOCTOR who miscarried after having the friggin' vaccine.
Omg these people are vicious
Pregnant women are supposed to avoid nearly all medications because of the unknown effects it could have on the baby. Even with things like aspirin you have to be careful.
Good on her
Holy shit. This waitress just got the tip of her lifetime. Im waiting on my job to do that shit to me. $$$
She must've seen the Simone Gold video. Dr. Gold shared deep concerns over pregnancy and the vaccine.
PLEASE NY help your people out.!Start the case for no forced vaccines. What a choice lose your job or long term potential damage to your baby. This is not really a choice!. Legitimate reason to refuse an untested in pregnancy, emergency use vaccine. This is a decision between a patient and doctor. To use the pro-abortion supporters words back at them.
Please read my comments above. We have the right to refuse under legal informed consent. US and International Law states that any person has the right to refuse to participate in medical experimentation. These "vaccines" are only FDA approved under the Emergency Authorization Act. They are experimental because the studies are still under way - the claim cannot be made that they are either safe or effective. Any claims to either are only preliminary.
The general public has been commandeered to participate in this huge medical experiment and they are counting on our ignorance. Any person given this "vaccine" must sign informed consent. The problem is that the benefits and risks cannot be advised in order to truly give informed consent because that is still being determined. This is the area we need to challenge because they cannot make any claims as to the safety or efficacy of the "vaccine" they want to give you - it is still being evaluated and is therefore an experiment. We have the legal right to refuse to participate in a medical experiment. A person cannot be coerced under threat of unemployment, or any other means of coercion, to participate in medical experimentation. Until the FDA changes the classification, this is the backbone of our argument and the basis for lawsuits. Hopefully, if this legal argument can gain some momentum, employers will be forced to back down or run the risk of lawsuits. They are not going to be able to wrangle out of this one because of decades of legal precedent in this area.
This is horrible.
NYC doesn't have the invulnerability it once had where they could find another person to work in a snap.
True that. There are very few left that actually want to work.
call Lin Wood
I’m in her boat. She isn’t currently pregnant. That would make it slightly easier to fight. She wants to get pregnant. The fear is that the vax will attack embryos and destroy their ability to carry to term. I can’t think of anything sadder than my fiancé and I trying to have children and me to suffer miscarriage after miscarriage because my body attacks the fetus like a virus.
You have the right to refuse any medical experimentation by law - both US and International law based on the Nuremberg Code and Helsinki. These "vaccines" are medical experimentation. This is why they are covered under Emergency Use Authorization by the FDA and not regular FDA approval. The distribution has been quick because of the bypassing of all the normal protocols used to gain FDA approval that can take years. (Sorry, not a big fan of Trump's Warp Speed that paved the way for this genocide.)
The previous animal experiments when this "vaccine" technology was used proved disasterous which under normal circumstances would have put a halt to any further trials. This was bypassed. With the public rollout, the studies regarding safely and efficacy are still ongoing. The general public is part of the experiment. They cannot make any claims as to the safely or the efficacy of this experiment. Therefore, this is the grounds under which you can refuse by informed consent.
If employers start to realize that this avenue may be the legal groundwork by which they may be subjected to multiple lawsuits if they try to force their employees to comply, we may be able to stop the madness - at least temporarily while these "vaccines" are still under EUA. Drug companies are released from all liability and smart lawyers are going to find ways to nail someone when the real damages start to occur. Larger companies are already exploring this area because they do not want to be sued either from making vaccination a condition of employment, or when employees start to sue them because they were forced and then suffered damages. Lawsuits are the language of motivation for corporations.
Educate yourself with this information and those you care about. We are not going to be successful in educating others if we just come off as antivaxxers. Our arguments must be legally sound and simple. We cannot be compelled to participate in medical experimentation.
THE WHO SAID FOR PREGNANT WOMEN TO NOT TAKE IT FFS - I THOUGHT THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO LISTEN TO THE SCIENCE??
There's got to be a lawsuit in here somewhere. My body, my choice.
Please read my other comments in this thread above. There is the legal basis for refusal under unformed consent laws. We must stop this at the employer level and not have to file lawsuits. They take time to resolve and that does a person no good when they are trying to keep a roof over their head and feed their families.
He body, her choice as "they" say. She needs a good lawyer to take her case. The demoncrates say it's ok to kill a baby but you are unable to save or protect a child's life. What is happening to the world? We need DJT to come back ASAP.
Hopefully she can manage to ride it out until she can sue and hopefully win.
Lawsuit.
File a lawsuit. It may take a while. Di it federally not through the state.
Informed Consent Action Network’s legal team is offering to help individuals challenge employers or schools that are requiring COVID vaccinations.
https://childrenshealthdefence.org/defender/forced-to-get-covid-vaccine-ican-may-be-able-to-help/
I'm not good at posting links sorry.
that restaurant needs a good boycott
we all have to start fighting back. they win this one and we are done!
You know what WILL affect her pregnancy? The millions that will be stuffed into her vault.
She needs a really good attorney.
If Gorilla glue Girl can get paid on go fund me I'd think she'd definitely be able to rake in some income for an attorney.
Just a other reason to use to justify firing someone who's pregnant.
Effing outrageous bullshit
she could win a lawsuit
Its NYC...what do you expect? lol they take things so literal & critical by the media / publishing sites they don't question otherwise...
She dodged a bullet and sue the restaurant...
This is my response to the mask/vaccine mandates.
I do not consent to wearing a mask, complying with unlawful mandates, and any requirement to take experimental unproven non-medically necessary vaccines.
No one has ever asked for my consent to wear them as is required for any medical procedure or practice.
I haven't been given informed consent as to the effectiveness of masks.
Show me the peer-reviewed studies with multiple repeatedly tested results in clinical trials showing the effectiveness of all types of masks and materials typically worn stopping viruses! Better yet, show me studies prior to January 2020 and the Covid-19 "Pandemic" so that I know they weren't funded to push a mask wearing agenda! I bet that's real difficult to do.
Here's 7 seperate doctors showing they don't work from studies prior to the Plannedemic: https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy
Dr Fauci is now a proven liar and fraud as he is on the record stating masks are ineffective due to people adjusting them too much, seen not wearing them multiple times despite telling the American people that we should, and then saying 2 masks are better than one.
Here's Dr Fauci lying to us about herd immunity: https://redstate.com/brandon_morse/2020/12/28/fauci-admits-hes-been-lying-to-us-about-herd-immunity-in-order-to-manipulate-us-n300795
Here's the paper Dr Fraudci co-authored detailing the bacterial infections during the Spanish Flu because people wore useless masks that created a warm moist breeding ground. Click the PDF button to download. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/198/7/962/2192118
You want to use the fraudulent and phony death count numbers to scare me into wearing a mask? Dr Fauci failed to provide adequate information seeing as he was the head of the NIH in 2005 when a paper detailing the effectiveness of Chloroquine against Coronavirus/SARS. That means he is directly responsible for all of those deaths and the Mainstream Media as well for their willful discrediting of HCQ as a CHEAP and EFFECTIVE treatment method for treating Covid-19. 2005 NIH study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
Of course if it's Cheap then you can't make money on the treatment and all the unnecessary masks you want to sell. If HCQ is effective, you can't scare the public into staying home so you can push for mail-in voting and The Great Reset.
Forcing masks is a violation of the Nuremberg Code and a Human Rights violation. The US is a signatory of the Nuremberg Code and the 2005 UNESCO update. The US and the major nations of the world made the Nuremberg Code after seeing the medical experiments and atrocities of the Nazi's.
A VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE UNESCO 2005 STATEMENT ON BIOETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 6, section 1: Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE or prejudice. (caps mine)
Article 6, section 3: In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
Read more: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001461/146180E.pdf
Nuremberg Code: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_5.pdf
Article 6 Informed Consent https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sajbl/article/download/113690/103409
Let's go over these. Article 6, section 1: Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information.
No one has asked for my consent! No one has given me adequate information! In fact, myself and millions like me have had to do our own research and share it with risk to being deplatformed from our social media accounts for 'mis-information' and 'Violating Community Standards' because that factual and sourced information goes against the deliberate lies and propoganda of the WHO and CDC.
"The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice."
I have never stated that I give my consent to wear a mask in order to shop, work, travel, or anything else necessary to live my life. Even if I had, the term WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE means I can revoke that consent at any time for any reason and there is nothing anyone can do about it!
Read this again carefully. Article 6, section 3: In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
The CDC and WHO guidelines DO NOT overrule my informed consent regardless of their status as a "community leader!" No one has that authority! Anyone forcing any mandate (or vaccine) upon your person without your consent is guilty of Human Rights Abuse and should be treated accordingly. I will take all measures including self defense to protect my bodily autonomy and human rights as needed.
Remember that it is against the law to discriminate against someone for a medical condition including a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Being "healthy" is the default medical condition and they have no evidence otherwise you aren't therefore they cannot force you to wear a mask.
It is a Federal Crime to Arrest you for not wearing a mask. https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The risks of Covid-19 to me are low due to my own blood type, O-Positive.
https://www.verywellhealth.com/type-o-blood-covid-19-5074429
"One of the largest data sets on the topic comes from the genetic testing company 23andMe, which has surveyed over a million people since April. The company’s survey data shows that people with type O blood are 9% to 18% less likely to test positive for COVID-19 than people with other blood types."
Shortly after 23andMe released their initial findings highlighting the protective effect of type O blood on June 8, a group of Harvard Medical School Researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital corroborated that people with type O were less likely to test positive for COVID-19.
https://medical.mit.edu/covid-19-updates/2020/07/blood-type-and-covid-19
https://www.technologynetworks.com/genomics/news/large-study-suggests-blood-type-o-may-be-a-protective-factor-against-covid-19-335881
For my employer:
This is not about safety.
You mandate I must take a CBT annually on Bloodborne Pathogens including Hepatitis yet you do not mandate the Hepatitis Vaccines! Therefore you have no standing to dictate I wear a mask or recieve a Covid-19 Vaccine.
I am more likely to drop a heavy object on my floor or have an ergonomic lift injury yet you do not mandate or subsidize safety toe footwear or ergonomic awareness CBTs. These were mandatory when I was in the US Air Force!
There is no such thing legally as a Covid-19 Vaccine! It doesn't meet the definition requirements. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02/joseph-mercola/covid-19-mrna-shots-are-legally-not-vaccines/
Thanks for all the information. Simply put, we have the right to refuse participation in a medical experiment.
Well, at least she'll never have to work again when she's done suing them
Call Lin Wood and your life will be one of great wealth!!