At 41:01 in his CPAC speech tonight, Trump starts talking about Bill Barr and questioning his lack of interest in election fraud.
At 43:06 Trump says he has a statement from US ATTORNEY in PA saying Bill Barr would not allow him to investigate fraud.
He goes on to say nobody else has seen this yet. Specifically asks Devin Nunes and Matt Gaetz if they have it yet. He directs them to talk to PA US Attorney and find out what is in letter.
Bill Barr better be tried as traitor if this is true. At least the Democrats tell you where they stand but the rhinos lie as they stab you in the back, I’m sure Trump will go after them twice as hard.
Yep, and they have/had enough balls, moxy, whatever you want to call it, to steal an election. They were brazen enough to tell us how they were going to do it. RINO's, in contrast, are cowards. As much as I detest the liberals, Rino's are the scum the liberals wash off their backs and I detest them just as much, if not more.
According to SariRaye on bitchute, he's already been tried via tribunal and has been sentenced to hang on August 2nd.
why should we believe SariRaye??
I'm not saying you should. I just put it out there. In the end, we need to research and judge for ourselves.
Should we automatically cast her off?
Nothing can be confirmed nor denied
It's a real shame too, since KFC can't sell buckets of chicken to the dead.
I haven’t watched the speech yet. That’s a big BOOM! These drips seem to be turning into a nice little stream. What are your thoughts on the Supreme Court actually acting when all this fraud comes before them?
Supreme Court has been playing dumb. Why prosecute one person when you're building a RICO? Giuliani told them what he was doing. So did Powell. The crooks can't stop, they are in too deep now. Hook, line, sinker.
i agree i think the SC was called off because there were better cases coming down the line to build precedent on. when the cases are filed it will all be in there. maybe a "forensic audit" was needed in order to produce the kjnd of evidence the supreme court would need
Fuck precedent, I hate that bullshit term.
Right, just because something went one way, doesn't mean everything goes that way.
Agree.
Supreme Court is corrupt, don’t put your faith in them.
exactly
Moot lol.
I don’t believe the Supreme Court will act. They have been threatened/compromised. Once again the choice was their’s. They could have stepped down, but being a member of the highest court in the U.S. is heady and job secure, powerful. So once again, the choice was their’s so they must face the consequences.
Trump often picks fights with the good guys while being nice to the bad guys.
Trump endorsed McCain.
Trump endorsed Romney.
Consider for a moment just how bad the two people above are. The warmonger McCain has killed hundreds of thousands with unnecessary wars and Romney has elites hands shoved so far up his ass he'll do or say literally anything.
Then Trump publicly picks a fight with Sessions. Even though Q said Trust Sessions.
Trump publicly picks a fight with Bill Barr, even though Q specifically called him the B2 bomber in https://qalerts.app/?n=3671
Barr also appointed Durham as a special prosecutor before he left office specifically so when he was fired in his position he could keep investigating. The lines between reality and the movie are very blurred. It's hard to understand what is real and what is part of the show.
Sessions actually appointed Durham, but Barr expanded his authority.
He was appointed by Barr in April of 2019. Five months after Sessions left office. Durham has been fired from his normal position after January 20th. He's now a special prosecutor only. Made so by Barr right after the election on November 3rd. Sessions was out right after the 2018 midterm. Two whole years before Durham was appointed special prosecutor.
It appears you are correct. Sessions appointed Durham as a federal attorney, but he was later appointed as SC by Barr. One source I saw even claims that Whittaker nominated Durham for SC, and then Barr finalized it. Looks like a good bit of smoke surrounding his SC appointment from what I can see.
Either way, I suspect Durham is swamp trash. I don't expect anything of great significance to come out of his SC. So in my opinion, it would seem fitting that he was appointed as SC by his fellow swamp trash, Barr.
If Durham was swamp trash, I suspect he would just fold up the entire investigation, and it would go away. If Biden is in charge, then there isn't anyone that would stop him. The Media would certainly have his back. No, just like everything else, it's being delayed so everything else can catch up. It has to be a Perfect Storm.
My theory on Durham is that he is actually a [republican allied] swamp extremist. Barr locked him in as SC so that he can continue collecting evidence.
Why did he collect all that evidence, but never use it- except for that one time when he charged an FBI peon with conspiracy, and making false statements? He later dropped the [major] conspiracy charge, and only charged him with lying, and let him off with probation. Why, oh why could that be?
I'll tell you why. That charge was a warning shot to the [democrat left] swamp. What for? Extortion. Pay up, or else get hit with the conspiracy charge. The democrat swamp paid the extortion fee to the republican swamp to drop the conspiracy charge.
Meanwhile, Durham and the republican swamp are sitting on a fucking gold mine of evidence that they would much rather use to extort the democrat swamp, rather than use that evidence for justice. We're not dealing with "the swamp." We the people are dealing with TWO swamps!"
After examining the seemingly inexplicable lack of justice being delivered during the last five years, the logical process of elimination leads me to a conclusion that corruption within the SC prosecution is the most likely reason for why we see zero justice. It's swamp vs. swamp in DC, and neither one of them want justice.
this is actually a really solid theory. we here at gaw assume its a game of good guys vs bad guys, but it could actually be a game of crook vs crook. or maybe it WAS a game of c v c. trump changed it up by being the good guy to clean up the swamp. if this version of the story is true then either trump threw the crooked right a bone to feast on or what?
From Trump's perspective, what would the rationale be for the good guy/bad guy strategy?
If Trump seems close to Sessions or Barr, then when they're called upon to bring down the cabal, the accusation will be made that they're just Trump's cronies doing what Trump told them to do with only political motives.
That's why he has distanced himself from them, in my opinion.
That's a good point and it makes sense. Thanks!
The fact that Trump told Matt and Devin to go talk to the PA attorney for themselves and didn’t just send them the statement shows how he his remaining isolated from everything.
Also this shows us Trump’s team is making moves in the background. They are taking statements from people in states where fraud was provable but not investigated. I wonder if they have other statements they have not shared yet?
Is it impossible for a white hat to turn black hat?
anyone can be bought or threatened.
Not everyone. Trump and Jovan Pulitzer spring to mind.
I think the plan was set in stone shortly after Trump came into office and we're just watching a movie.
If Trump and Q really have everything, they gain nothing by calling out Bill Barr (assuming he would be a white hat gone rogue).
It only makes Trump look weak. As Sun Tzu says, act weak when you're strong.
If Trump is really only just hanging on by a thread of hope that can only be realized if Bill Barr is brought to justice for covering up election fraud, then Q is not real.
Would you like to draw a conclusion?
Those who don’t support the President, are/were treasonous. You chose to accept the position, now you must face the consequences of your actions. You had two choices: resign or support. The choice was your decision, now let the cards fall where they may.
We’re watching a movie.
I’m not sure who’s bad in this movie yet, maybe Barr, or they’re setting up the drama for the grand finale.
I need more popcorn.
Watch what they DO and not what they SAY. Barr assigned Durham as a special prosecutor before he left office so that the investigation couldn't be stopped. Biden and the current AG can fire Durham at any time yet they don't. Actions speak louder than words. It's all a show.
That’s what I heard, that Trump appointed swamp creatures to test them, and many failed, like Barr
I believe it's misdirection. But time will tell. I can't fathom why Barr would assign Durham as a special prosecutor on his way out to keep his investigation going, if Barr was a Black Hat. Also remember, we needed the election fraud to be dragged out. People wanted to jump the gun right away and Barr had to stop it. Not because there wasn't election fraud, or he wanted them to get away with it, but because the timing wasn't right.
I had that thought the second I hear Bill Barr was going to be in the administration. Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer.
I think that’s also why Fauci was put out front. He became a household name. His involvement with funding viral gain of function research in secret Chinese labs wouldn’t have been noticed by normies had Trump not put him center stage.
Sometimes it takes more courage to do the wrong thing...
Anonymous Conservative's take:
Are we clear that this election fraud and bioweapon are millions times more serious than Pearl Harbor?
Never mind the PA US attorney, drag Bill Barr's ass in for questioning
“I don’t recall. I deleted those.”
Ok then, you’re free to go. Have a nice day.
"That's classified. I cannot speak about it."
Lots of BOOMS tonight!
barr always reminds me of that fat guy that did the glad bag commercials
I always thought of the little dancing cup guy lol - I’m probably dating myself here
Well, this is what I wanted to hear. Either Bar is working hard to uncover fraud or he's a fucking traitors piece of shit. Trump choose the later. Bar needs to hang. Now please do Mike Pence.
OP, Can you link to the video that your timestamps correspond to?
It’s here https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJdveSXK/this-is-trumps-speech-today---nc/c/
Well ole Billy Barr tied to Epstein also did such a thing? The same Billy Barr that joined the CIA as a China Analyst while studying everything China at George Washington University? Say it ain’t so….
Is President Trump confirming RRN's report about Bill Barr being convicted of treason last month? Interesting this is coming out now.
I can't tell is Bill Barr being traitor is part of the movie or it's real. So much of what is going on is blurring the lines.
If you have been following Q's posts, Bill Barr must appear totally biased against Trump, because they need him for other important tasks. Q refers to Barr as a "stealth bomber."
Not to disagree, but that is an anon interpretation, not a direct Q quotable.
Though that is the best likely interpretation, it won't be the first one that would be shown wrong.
Hardly an interpretation, it’s a strong inference.
https://qalerts.app/?n=3671
You sure it's Matt Gaetz? I know he mentioned Matt Whitaker, his former Attorney General a couple times in the speech.
He was praising Matt and Devin on fighting in Congress just a few minutes earlier. He also mentioned Gaetz last name earlier in the speech while looking in the same direction. He asked them all to stand at the beginning. Just an educated guess who he was speaking to, but it was a guess.
Also mentioned Matt and Mercedes Schlapp a few times too, just came across a random clip in my feed
Whoa is right!!!