No!!!!!, you should die now!
(twitter.com)
Comments (81)
sorted by:
Or maybe they don't need porn at all, twithead. Maybe they just need to start interacting with real people more instead of their phones.
Notice she pulled the tweet but she's still getting absolutely hammered, and rightly so.
Maybe she worshipped satan at a young age lol.
Exactly this^^^! That crap messes with people's heads in a big way.
Porn should be wiped out. It decays society as a whole, and that is not just true with children.
When I was younger, I would've thought you a tyrant. Now I understand why this would be a good thing. Who decides what is and isn't porn though?
What is and isn't?
I'd say that is fairly simple to decide. If it is showing sex acts in any form or fashion it is porn be it film, printed, or live.
If the intent of the artist is to cause sexual arousal, it is porn. Thus, girls wearing bikinis and grinding on each other is porn. So are the frescos in Pompeii.
If the intent of the artist is to show off the amazing mechanics of beauty of the human form, it is not porn. Thus, the statue of David and things like medical photos are not.
There's a gray area for things like ancient fertility objects, grainy black and white artsy semi-nudes, and product sales like lingerie.
People can be sexually aroused by anything, because people are twisted. So you can't look at how it makes the person feel. You must look at the intent of the artist and the creator.
This is why Bill Barr goes full bag-piper when ever he passes a KFC.
Lol dead on my man.
I can't even decipher what this means
Kek
Try explaining that to the little minor lefty demons. They don't get it.
Actually that doesn't support their effortst to undermine society and bring about the hell on earth they and their masters so desire so they are always going to try to subvert any attempt to ban one of their best tools.
You're damn right. Always a pull from the dark things in life.
fuck me bet you're fun at parties.
Lol, I try to avoid them! I'm an introvert.
Couldn't care less about porn though. It's not my vice, but I have my own (nicotine, alcohol). I consider it a vice like any other. To much of any vice can destroy a man and his family. Moderation is good. What consenting adults watch is their business. But keep it away from the kids, duh.
Lucky I dont have a family to destroy.
NOW GIMME DEM JUBBLIES!!!
So things like playboy magazine would still be around then.
No that is print. Playboy is just a gateway drug. kek
You can't see the slippery slopen old CIA Heffner took this country down?
So you're adding no nude photos to your restrictions?
If you don't understand what porn is, I can't help you.
I asked for your definition of it, because there are MANY kinds of porn, and you don't seem to comprehend english well enough to respond in any coherent manner. If in your head, there is just one kind of porn, great. But the law can't just say "someone with common sense and a brain decides what is porn." The law needs to be specific or it will be abused. What are you so confused about?
Should this "porn" ban include nude photographs? Does this include art like greek statues or nude paintings? Should it include fetish stuff, like foot fetishes, where there are no sex acts going on and the participants are often clothed? If you don't know the answers to these questions you shouldn't have an opinion on the topic.
Penetration, or is dry humping with clothes on ok?
I see Heckles brought his troop to the rescue. I was wondering how long before the rest showed up. kek
shuddap and answer my question fagboy
Go blow it out your ass, bitch. I owe you absolutely nothing. Nada, zilch, zip.
lol
My troop? I have a troop?! That's fucking awesome! Who are they, I wanna meet 'em?
Anybody with a brain and common sense. If people are naked or partially naked and engaged in sex, whether with someone or alone, then it's porn.
By that definition playboy doesn't qualify and is still legal. Also, there are many things people get off to that don't involve overt sexual acts, are those to be banned too?
Oh brother. I hope you live in a cave. And who said my list was comprehensive. Just trying to enlighten things for a dim bulb.
Are you retarded or something? I'm just trying to get you to understand what the position you claim to hold actually involves. Is playboy okay? It's just nudes, no sex acts. It doesn't fall under your definition, but it's something I still would consider porn. If you're going to make laws like this these are discussions that need to be had.
Is breath play okay? Is ryona? Foot fetishes? Where do you draw the line? Do you really trust the government to not abuse this new power? If you don't want tyranny the government needs hard lines.
You are using the same lefty tactics that were taught to college students by their communist professors. The same tactics Saul taught all his devil worshipping disciples. You just want to dull the attack. Go back to jacking off and leave the details to those interested in a real solution to the filth permeating society. Head on back down to the library and give the dim wit mommies and their kiddies one of your shows. Your tactics are obvious and boring.
I literally lead this by saying I agree with you and am just asking questions about how you would realistically implement such a thing. Trying to show you it's much much more complicated than just banning porn. Your anger is due to your position being founded on fantasy and not reality and when asked simple questions about how you would implement such a thing your brain breaks down because you haven't thought about how your position would actually be applied to reality.
Had to look this one up, at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryona
Seems it involves abuse. (Yup, wikipedia. Deal with it.)
From wikepedia:
The term is contrasted with sexual sadism and rape pornography, in that ryona is a voyeuristic fantasy fetish, a romanticized subgenre aimed at a female target demographic and are almost always of non-explicit sexual nature.
The nature of abuse can vary greatly, but it usually includes one or more of the following:
So that's that. Violence, rape, torture, amputation...surprised to see it being offered here alongside "Playboy" as an innocuous alternative to hardcore.
Innocuous? My point was more that just banning sex acts or nudity wouldn't cover stuff like that. I'm not advocating for anyone to watch porn of any kind.
Or you could just not watch it and let people make their own choices.
I love seeing people piss and moan about censorship on this site, yet as soon as the opportunity to censor shit you don't like comes up, you jump all over it.
This is how it works - porn gets banned ...(slippery slope).... social media is banning the POTUS.
You're no different than the fucking progressives.
Why is porn free? Consider the effect.
Porn has been around forever - long before the internet. People like looking at naked people. It's human nature, not some crazy Jewish plot. I do question the whole "incest" thing they're pushing these days, but again, you can choose not to watch. If they're not fucking kids or raping people, I have no problem with it.
And honestly, everything on the internet is free - if you know where to look.
People here question why the ‘lifesaving’ vaccines are free and highly accessible. I wonder why, too. Many people suspect bad things.
Most people attest to feeling good in the moment of porn, and shame afterward. Yet we are told to feel pride. Which reaction is natural?
I think it’s an odd coincidence that the other definition of fetish concerns the use of an object for spiritual powers and shamanistic ritual. Not too disimmilar from how pharmacy comes from pharmakeia, which deals with magic, and feels good in the moment, but often hurts in the long run.
In purely these things, I’d enjoy more perspective. I won’t spend time arguing morality at the moment. I’m more interested in the language I mentioned as I believe coincidences are rare.
I sure could and so could you, but that was not what the thread is about it is about stopping it being pushed to children. Got and solutions for it being freely accessed and not have it available to children, or are you good with them accessing it too?
After all they could just 'make their own choices' about whether they want to watch it too.
What's your choice / agenda porn and a continued slow slide into hell? Or a change to the status quo?
You do know you can put parental controls on you computers and browsers, right?
My browser is default set at "moderate". You have the option to turn it off completely or set it to "strict". This should filter out the vast majority of porn sites.
https://bestparentalcontrolapps.com/how-to-block-porn-sites/
You do know that won't keep a smart kid out right?
Are we talking about small kids accidentally running into porn or a horny pubescent teen with raging hormones trying to get his rocks off because all he thinks of 24/7 is girls? - because I doubt a fucking nuclear bomb would stop him from jerking off.
I know but I don't want to give any govt that level of control over what people can view when it's all consenting adults involved and no violence being depicted or suggested, because violence against others is not protected by the Bill of Rights.
You give them that power, then they can say well you know what, I don't like how revved up that crowd gets at Trump rallies, so they're banned too. We just don't like people getting too excited, someone might get hurt. FOR THE GOOD OF SOCIETY it's banned. Etc.
I no longer consume any porn at all, and I don't miss it one bit. But I'm a huge 1st Amendment absolutist.
I am also a 1st Amendment absolutist, but I recogize that many of these platforms are not secured to just adults only. I also recognize that porn is used as one means of population control, and to dehumanize our personal life experiences to the point people become disconnected with what real personal interaction is supposed to be, and the role it plays in making us human.
You say consenting adults, but how do make sure those are the only ones with access? What makes you think is is not damaging to even adults and society at large?
I understand your concern with the slippery slope, but I see the slippery slope we have taken into the sewer with it available too.
All fair comments.
I don't know the answers. I was merely putting out the hypothetical that IF the adults were consenting, THEN there is no violence implicit in the material JUST because they're having sex of some kind.
I agree that it's nearly impossible to tell when women have been methodically raped from childhood into thinking acting in porn is what they need to be doing.
100% agree
Yep, why can't we let adults decide what they want to do with their own lives? I personally don't give a crap about what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home. Why are some folks always trying to legislate morality? It is not for you to judge. I don't drink and i don't smoke, but I'm also not running around trying to ban it. Does it destroy lives? Yes, does it get you sick? Yes, but it is their choice. Children are different, they don't have the faculties, in general, to determine what might be the best for them. That is best left up to the parents and to some degree, law enforcement (if the parents are not doing what is best for the kids). I understand you don't like porn, good for you, you are free to choose. Be respectful and allow everyone else the same courtesy.
I agree with you in general, but in this one instance I might agree with some kind of intervention. I think people fail to realize just how much of our civilization is built on sexual energy. Men are very 'carrot on a stick' type creatures. We need that carrot to go out and expend the energy necessary to building a functioning society. Porn puts that carrot right in front of you and it's getting to the point where all of society is feeling the effect of weakened men.
So while you can say live and let live, and it's true in a way, it's also false in a way too because the effects of porn do eventually make their way through the entire society.
Democrats, are you getting it now? Sick people like this are only promoting the gross immorality of the ones you voted for with their blessing. I wonder what's on this woman's laptop?
Keep your hands off our children!
Truly disgusting.
Just wow.
There’s plenty of porn available for kids. For example, music videos by Cardi B or any other rapper. Also, There’s plenty of porn for teens made by teens available on Snapchat.
Tip for Parents: When you let your kid take their smart phone into their bedrooms what you’re letting them do is set up an entire porn production studio right there in their bedroom.
"Alright everyone, put down your crayons and coloring books, it's time for PornHub."
No, no, they get “Porn Hub for Kids”.
Maybe we should just ban all porn
She's the daughter of UK politician Amber Rudd, more on the toxic bitch's tweets in this article:
https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2021/07/29/who-is-flora-gill-twitter-reacts-to-journalist-pitching-adult-content-for-kids/
She was once cancelled from speaking at a university and 'de-platformed'. Now I bloody know why. The media made a big fuss about her being cancelled, they didn't tell us she was a sick puppy- kept that quiet as per usual.
Thanks for catching this fren.
Someone should sodomize pedophiles with a chainsaw.. Now hear me out..
I guess I haven't seen much porn because I've never came across anyone getting choked before.
The bizarre thing is it is the damn liberals trying to normalize everything from choking to cuckolding to everything else… so while it is true that kids are getting their hands on pretty messed up shit, a better thought would be to stop making all the messed up shit… obviously:
What?
Satan has already had his way with this one.
(((journalists)))
google image search this one (Flora Gill) and look at that schnozz
every single time
that's like starting them off on camel lights so they don't hurt themselves with full on cigarettes. fucking stupid.
This is one of the worst things i have ever read 🔥😡🔥
Nobody tell them it already exists: It's called Rule 34 [DO NOT RESEARCH]
It scares me that they are considering opening Pandora's "-booru"
Pronouns in bio? I'm shocked!
Flora you ignorant slut . . . .
Her tweet was riddled with hate speech and bigotries!
How dare she imply that there is something wrong with, or twisted about choking and brutalizing Yu our partner during sex!?
If that's what kids are seeking out to watch we shouldn't shame them for it and tell them to watch something that society seems acceptable.
Is she trying to marginalize the BDSM community even further? What a monster!