I've noticed something on this board - Every one proclaims themselves as 'truth warriors', yet avidly defend obvious mistakes, fake news, clickbait as "well, it's ok to lie when our side does it!".
It's sad, because I think it's indicating how easy it is to fool this site as long as it confirms bias... not good.
Oh, no, I think the OP should correct the post title. Surprised he hasn't yet.
But I'd wager that most of the people who saw the tweet don't know who the actor is at all, yet still enjoyed it, because it's just such a perfect pwning that it has value on its own.
OP is using a lie as clickbait at this point. OP really should have fixed it by now.
Another thing about being a 'truth warrior,' as you put it. Truthers are overwhelmed as it is. Getting bogged down in the names of actors etc. is a waste. It's ok to be wrong on the small stuff. I know you're fearful of sharing a meme like this and being embarrassed, but I think it's more fruitful to explain to your recipients that you don't fact check the small stuff. Cuz it's better to take lots of shots on goal than a few perfect ones.
Even if you don't tell them upfront that you're not fact checking the small stuff, it's still going in to their heads. They'll say they don't believe your general worldview because of this small strawman. But they're only doing that to save face and avoid being wrong. Deep down they know that the name of the person who said it, as in this example, does not matter, at all.
Most people flick through on their phone and read some headlines and that’s what they know about things. If something comes up, they Google it. Google decided Iver doesn’t work, and the headlines from CNN and otherwise say it doesn’t work, so to them it doesn’t work.
Probably helps plenty of people and doesn’t help plenty of others, but there’s a giant echo chamber that most people live in that prevents them from having any but professionally assigned opinions.
They get their talking points from the 4AM memo that all the media gets every single morning. Repeating the same odd words or phrases across all media on the same day shows that they get their marching orders from one and only one source.
And we know it's about 4AM as the stuff starts showing up in their feeds soon afterwards.
And exactly when was that? I'm pretty old too and the media has been in the business of lying since I've been here.
Remember reporting on Tet offensive?
Remember reporting on the Tonkin Gulf incident?
Did the news ever tell us how US companies were funding Hitler war?
Did media hide facts about JFK assignation?
Sure, media lies, distortions, and cover ups have gone to new level in internet age, but media always lied pretty much.
Chris Dotson has not taken it down. Look at his Twitter feed (where you will learn that his is not the actor from NCIS, btw, but just some rando) and click on "Tweets & replies". It's still there as of noon today (CST) 09/03/2021.
Keep in mind the Indian Bar Association is bringing mass murder charges against the chief scientist of the World Health Organization for shit-talking Ivermectin on social media. She is an Indian national and she is in deep doo-doo.
And for future studies just type covid 19 and ivermectin into clinicaltrials.gov
clinicaltrials.gov......
Gee, 75 worldwide studies including Duke, Vanderbilt etc. are looking into this horse paste
They’ll just link to NYTimes or CNN saying they work, who are mentioning tweets someone made. It’s a giant circle jerk. We have no easy way of knowing how well or poorly any of these things work if they’re new and the media’s and Big Tech’s picked a side on it.
They are genuinely oblivious to truth. There are plenty of corrupt 'experts', politicians, government officials and journalists who know the truth, and are killing people with their lies, but there are many on the side of evil who are genuinely clueless.
NCIS is such a stupid show and I always found it such a random premise. As if the real NCIS is investigating murders and shit as often as these on screen heros. Maybe, but I doubt it. They act like they are the behavior analysis unit of the NCIS. its a bad bad show. Just garbage
Is it possible that they have a point? Ivermectin is used to treat parasites. COVID is supposedly a virus. I could see why some might think an anti-parasite drug won't work to treat a virus, however, deworming while infected with a virus isn't necessarily a bad idea. There's no doubt that Ivermectin works for many things, but are there really studies that show it can be used to treat COVID or any other virus? I think this is why the other side thinks we're conspiracy theorists. Ivermectin is a wonder drug, won a Nobel Prize in 2015, and has saved millions of lives worldwide since the late 1970's, BUT claiming it can kill a virus is kind of a stretch no? Or did I miss something?
You missed a lot, but there are two main points. Combined with zinc, from what I understand, it interferes with the rna replication process. Interrupt that and it becomes amazingly easy for your body to crush the remainder. Then we have the other theories which are intriguing to say the least. Namely, if all the drugs that happen to work on covid are anti-parasitics ... are we actually dealing with a virus at all?
Ahhh I forgot about India! Thanks. The only problem here is that they are relying on PCR test results to prove that Ivermectin is effective for treating COVID. They show 2% of Ivermectin-takers tested positive, yet 11.7% of non-takers also tested positive. Since the PCR test is bunk, these numbers don't really matter right? Your point about rna replication is interesting though. Here's what I found:
"...the most extensively characterized viral endosymbionts of protozoan parasites of medical relevance are small, non-enveloped, double-stranded (ds) RNA viruses of the family Totiviridae..."
So, double-stranded RNA viruses are the most common product of protozoan parasites...which can easily be stopped by simply taking Ivermectin? Any scientists out there that can help make sense of all this? I just don't like jumping to conclusions about things I don't fully understand. What do you think?
Just theory but I wonder if maybe we’ve all been manipulated into missing something. Consider why so many people treated for a “virus” died, but people being treated with a medication that is meant for parasitical infections are cured - quickly! What better way to hide the actual culprit (and therefore keep the “cure” from being approved for treatment) than to disguise it by calling it something it isn’t? I have no proof - but what if? Who would think to test a COVID patient for parasites?
That's what I'm trying to figure out. The screenshot just says they're Ivermectin studies but I can't access them to see if they're even related to COVID. I have to do more research but it looks like protozoan parasites can carry certain viruses that lead to complications, even death, if not treated. So Ivermectin would seem to work here to prevent the parasites from spreading a virus. I still don't see where COVID comes in though. I'm no virologist that's for sure.
Wow! Thanks for this. So there's plenty of evidence that Ivermectin works in conjunction with other things to treat COVID but the question is, why does it work? This complicates things. Are people being injected with parasites? This is crazy.
All kinds of links in the other comments will provide more details.
PS. You are NOT Insignificant!
😏
I almost forgot to say the reason you don’t understand is because Nothing makes sense. Science is broken right now. Having been hijacked by politics, it is loaded with lies. At this point we each need to use our own common sense. I no longer trust, but verify; I verify BEFORE I trust.
Yeah, when people are dropping like flies, you don't really need double-blind peer reviewed studies so much as you need the fucking cheap drug that is saving lives in 48 hours. Anecdotal evidence of LIVES BEING SAVED INSTEAD OF WASTED is good enough.
We can get all sciencey about it after we end the pandemic with it.
While you're at it, Dotson (Dotson...we got Dotson here!! See? Nobody cares), suppose you show us the double-blind peer reviewed studies that indicate masks do anything to block any transmission of any virus. We'll wait.
We would be better off without porn. We’d also be better off without Instagram and Facebook and Twitter. And dating apps. Forums and BBS’s were mostly positive.
New internet’s a crazy controlled dopamine machine of porn and propaganda filled with ads. Old internet was a cool hacker and hobbiest space that was basically ad free and filled with people that knew about computers. I can’t even go to most normal websites anymore because they’re bogged down with ad servers layered over ad servers layered over tracking servers.
Most people seeing the new internet on mobile devices doesn’t help because it’s inherently against typing long form content or reading long form content, so you just get porn in various forms.
I remember when Facebook first came out it was useful. An actual book of faces of people you know, divided by class and such. Then they added the ‘feed’, and it was the weirdest creepiest thing ever. It’s exclusively suited to insubstantial content of no substance.
That used to be the narrative. I don't think much has changed, other than people no longer believe the narrative.
The fundamental change happened when they shot Kennedy.
Next fundamental change came when Reagan was shot...
That was more of a reminder shot
Nah, even kronkite had spin...
Was it really Kennedy that got shot on that day? 🧐
Unfortunately
Patriot Act + Smith-Mundt
I remember cnn faking being in iraq during the gulf war.
When Obama legalized propaganda use on Americans.
They pushed and shilled for the Iraq war non stop. WMD and on and on.
Yeah, like, whose tweet is this, Chris Dotson, the actor from NCIS? Answer: nope, just a guy whose name happens to be Chris Dotson. Ahem.
In the words of Walter Sobchak, ". . . fucking amateurs!"
Not really the point. Nobody here watches TV anyway.
man this is a weak ass reply, considering the sassy title of the thread and all the comments directed at Chris Dotson the actor
I've noticed something on this board - Every one proclaims themselves as 'truth warriors', yet avidly defend obvious mistakes, fake news, clickbait as "well, it's ok to lie when our side does it!".
It's sad, because I think it's indicating how easy it is to fool this site as long as it confirms bias... not good.
It's not fooling 'the site' you're just witnessing our own NPCs at work. We have plenty of useful idiots on our side.
You're friendly :)
<3
Oh, no, I think the OP should correct the post title. Surprised he hasn't yet.
But I'd wager that most of the people who saw the tweet don't know who the actor is at all, yet still enjoyed it, because it's just such a perfect pwning that it has value on its own.
OP is using a lie as clickbait at this point. OP really should have fixed it by now.
Another thing about being a 'truth warrior,' as you put it. Truthers are overwhelmed as it is. Getting bogged down in the names of actors etc. is a waste. It's ok to be wrong on the small stuff. I know you're fearful of sharing a meme like this and being embarrassed, but I think it's more fruitful to explain to your recipients that you don't fact check the small stuff. Cuz it's better to take lots of shots on goal than a few perfect ones.
Even if you don't tell them upfront that you're not fact checking the small stuff, it's still going in to their heads. They'll say they don't believe your general worldview because of this small strawman. But they're only doing that to save face and avoid being wrong. Deep down they know that the name of the person who said it, as in this example, does not matter, at all.
As someone who cares not for actors, I care not.
Most people flick through on their phone and read some headlines and that’s what they know about things. If something comes up, they Google it. Google decided Iver doesn’t work, and the headlines from CNN and otherwise say it doesn’t work, so to them it doesn’t work.
Probably helps plenty of people and doesn’t help plenty of others, but there’s a giant echo chamber that most people live in that prevents them from having any but professionally assigned opinions.
They get their talking points from the 4AM memo that all the media gets every single morning. Repeating the same odd words or phrases across all media on the same day shows that they get their marching orders from one and only one source.
And we know it's about 4AM as the stuff starts showing up in their feeds soon afterwards.
And exactly when was that? I'm pretty old too and the media has been in the business of lying since I've been here.
Remember reporting on Tet offensive? Remember reporting on the Tonkin Gulf incident? Did the news ever tell us how US companies were funding Hitler war? Did media hide facts about JFK assignation?
Sure, media lies, distortions, and cover ups have gone to new level in internet age, but media always lied pretty much.
He's been taking them down. He replied that ivermectin was only for parasites lol a virus is a parasite https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21413309/
It’s gonna be something along the line with “it’s debunked”
His attempt to hide his stupidity is futile, the internet is forever!
I didn't know his name before, but now I do for hiding legitimate information.
what a pussy coward. he'll make another similar post like that one never happened for further propagandize this shit.
Chris Dotson has not taken it down. Look at his Twitter feed (where you will learn that his is not the actor from NCIS, btw, but just some rando) and click on "Tweets & replies". It's still there as of noon today (CST) 09/03/2021.
You're welcome. Also, it's not the actor, FYI.
It's not the actor though. Just some guy with the same name. LOLOLOL
Some people find ASMR and sleep stories to be satisfying, calming, and rebalancing.
I find this satisfying, calming, and rebalancing.
Haha, yes
Hope someone followed up with the papers showing where Pfizer ditched the control groups (and other fuckery) for their injections.
Keep in mind the Indian Bar Association is bringing mass murder charges against the chief scientist of the World Health Organization for shit-talking Ivermectin on social media. She is an Indian national and she is in deep doo-doo.
YES!! India is BASED. They got charges on Gates too as most of us know 👍🏽
🍿🐸🇺🇸
Speaking of links, how about one this tweet?
Gone
A link to the studies the please?
Edit: it looks like the data is from https://ivmmeta.com/
https://twitter.com/Covid19Crusher/status/1433531443385286657
It's a link to the original tweet with the summary
Looks like he got his data from
https://ivmmeta.com/
Good resource. Saved for the red pill repository.
We have red pill repositories, and the left needs red pill suppositories.
https://twitter.com/Covid19Crusher/status/1433531443385286657
It didn't hurt to ask in case someone had it saved.
Right? WE ARE NOT YIUR ARMY. Low effort reject
https://twitter.com/Covid19Crusher/status/1433531443385286657
here
https://twitter.com/Covid19Crusher/status/1433531443385286657
You could tell them the news is why you haven't seen any actual treatments but then they'll just reeeeeeee and say the news doesn't lie
This is great. So are boobs.
😂🤣☝🏼
And for future studies just type covid 19 and ivermectin into clinicaltrials.gov clinicaltrials.gov...... Gee, 75 worldwide studies including Duke, Vanderbilt etc. are looking into this horse paste
Please link to the double blind, peer reviewed tests that show the vaccine is safe and affective…. I wont wait, i’ll just laugh…..
They’ll just link to NYTimes or CNN saying they work, who are mentioning tweets someone made. It’s a giant circle jerk. We have no easy way of knowing how well or poorly any of these things work if they’re new and the media’s and Big Tech’s picked a side on it.
LOL wrong Chris Dotson, fren.
Came here to say this after looking up Chris Dotson because I had no idea who he was. The Chris Dotson here is just another dork with a Twitter.
Guess he never heard,the never ask a question you don't know the answer to.
Lol
The sheep are utter morons.
They are genuinely oblivious to truth. There are plenty of corrupt 'experts', politicians, government officials and journalists who know the truth, and are killing people with their lies, but there are many on the side of evil who are genuinely clueless.
Wow what a soy pussy I haven't watched the show since Ziva and Tony left.
NCIS is such a stupid show and I always found it such a random premise. As if the real NCIS is investigating murders and shit as often as these on screen heros. Maybe, but I doubt it. They act like they are the behavior analysis unit of the NCIS. its a bad bad show. Just garbage
ALL TV IS GARBAGE.
C'mon man South Park Simpsons family guy
ok...you got me there. I digg old creative animated stuff too. The Tick, Cow & Chicken, Courage...the list is long.
And those llamas lol
☝🏼😂
90% of the real NCIS is investigating naval cadets who are doing bath salts.
Lol what
They are the police investigators in the navy. There is a big drug problem with naval cadets in Annapolis.
NCIS doesn't investigate murders and stuff like that, local police and FBI do that.
NCIS is more about filling out paperwork to bring a UCMJ charge of adultery against a Chief Petty Officer, and other low level shit like that.
Gotcha. Whats the issue with drugs and naval cadets? Or why?
Is it possible that they have a point? Ivermectin is used to treat parasites. COVID is supposedly a virus. I could see why some might think an anti-parasite drug won't work to treat a virus, however, deworming while infected with a virus isn't necessarily a bad idea. There's no doubt that Ivermectin works for many things, but are there really studies that show it can be used to treat COVID or any other virus? I think this is why the other side thinks we're conspiracy theorists. Ivermectin is a wonder drug, won a Nobel Prize in 2015, and has saved millions of lives worldwide since the late 1970's, BUT claiming it can kill a virus is kind of a stretch no? Or did I miss something?
You missed a lot, but there are two main points. Combined with zinc, from what I understand, it interferes with the rna replication process. Interrupt that and it becomes amazingly easy for your body to crush the remainder. Then we have the other theories which are intriguing to say the least. Namely, if all the drugs that happen to work on covid are anti-parasitics ... are we actually dealing with a virus at all?
There is MASSIVE evidence of Ivermectin's effectiveness but it is being suppressed. Look to India for that. In fact, one WHO scientist is deep doodoo over it. https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2021/06/india-could-sentence-who-chief-scientist-to-death-for-misleading-over-ivermectin-and-killing-indians.html
A little digging and you will find a lot of good info.
Ahhh I forgot about India! Thanks. The only problem here is that they are relying on PCR test results to prove that Ivermectin is effective for treating COVID. They show 2% of Ivermectin-takers tested positive, yet 11.7% of non-takers also tested positive. Since the PCR test is bunk, these numbers don't really matter right? Your point about rna replication is interesting though. Here's what I found:
"...the most extensively characterized viral endosymbionts of protozoan parasites of medical relevance are small, non-enveloped, double-stranded (ds) RNA viruses of the family Totiviridae..."
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12985-020-01410-1
So, double-stranded RNA viruses are the most common product of protozoan parasites...which can easily be stopped by simply taking Ivermectin? Any scientists out there that can help make sense of all this? I just don't like jumping to conclusions about things I don't fully understand. What do you think?
Just theory but I wonder if maybe we’ve all been manipulated into missing something. Consider why so many people treated for a “virus” died, but people being treated with a medication that is meant for parasitical infections are cured - quickly! What better way to hide the actual culprit (and therefore keep the “cure” from being approved for treatment) than to disguise it by calling it something it isn’t? I have no proof - but what if? Who would think to test a COVID patient for parasites?
Huh? Those cited studies weren’t about its effectiveness for deworming, homie.
That's what I'm trying to figure out. The screenshot just says they're Ivermectin studies but I can't access them to see if they're even related to COVID. I have to do more research but it looks like protozoan parasites can carry certain viruses that lead to complications, even death, if not treated. So Ivermectin would seem to work here to prevent the parasites from spreading a virus. I still don't see where COVID comes in though. I'm no virologist that's for sure.
https://c19ivermectin.com/
Here's a start.
Wow! Thanks for this. So there's plenty of evidence that Ivermectin works in conjunction with other things to treat COVID but the question is, why does it work? This complicates things. Are people being injected with parasites? This is crazy.
In response to your questions:
All kinds of links in the other comments will provide more details. PS. You are NOT Insignificant!
😏 I almost forgot to say the reason you don’t understand is because Nothing makes sense. Science is broken right now. Having been hijacked by politics, it is loaded with lies. At this point we each need to use our own common sense. I no longer trust, but verify; I verify BEFORE I trust.
I assume he required the same double blind, peer review tests for the vaccine, right?
Yea, that's what I thought.
Crowd-sourced narrative busting is the most lethal. The shill really set himself up.
Your point aside, porn is a soul sucking thing anyway.
Anyone got a link to that post / those studies?
Here's what I was given. It's legit:
https://c19ivermectin.com/
Thank you.
For real...? Show me a double blind peer reviewed study saying the vaccine works. Oh wait...
Yeah, when people are dropping like flies, you don't really need double-blind peer reviewed studies so much as you need the fucking cheap drug that is saving lives in 48 hours. Anecdotal evidence of LIVES BEING SAVED INSTEAD OF WASTED is good enough.
We can get all sciencey about it after we end the pandemic with it.
While you're at it, Dotson (Dotson...we got Dotson here!! See? Nobody cares), suppose you show us the double-blind peer reviewed studies that indicate masks do anything to block any transmission of any virus. We'll wait.
Chris is reee'ing right now
Please show your peer-reviewed validation logo ie that nasty blue checkmark? I'll wait.
Watching porn only leads to suffering, that's a fact.
We would be better off without porn. We’d also be better off without Instagram and Facebook and Twitter. And dating apps. Forums and BBS’s were mostly positive.
Miss the days of forums, and BBS. Old internet was so much fun.
New internet’s a crazy controlled dopamine machine of porn and propaganda filled with ads. Old internet was a cool hacker and hobbiest space that was basically ad free and filled with people that knew about computers. I can’t even go to most normal websites anymore because they’re bogged down with ad servers layered over ad servers layered over tracking servers.
Most people seeing the new internet on mobile devices doesn’t help because it’s inherently against typing long form content or reading long form content, so you just get porn in various forms.
I remember when Facebook first came out it was useful. An actual book of faces of people you know, divided by class and such. Then they added the ‘feed’, and it was the weirdest creepiest thing ever. It’s exclusively suited to insubstantial content of no substance.
Oeuf
Please link to the double blind, peer reviewed tests that show this is the same Chris Dotson that is a FUCKWIT ACTOR that was on NCIS. I'll wait.
Chris got his ass handed back to him. Hope he chokes on it.
Most people in the United States are taking medical advice from politicians and journalists.
Rekt