MLK was a Republican and the nitwit democrats still believe the Republicans are the jim crow party....cant teach fucking stupid....Lincoln freed them he was Republican then the dummycrats formed the kkk to oppose him....cant teach fucking stupid......
Theynalways fact check with. “The parties switched platforms” - the dumbest explanation I have ever heard. What theyreally mean is “instead of outright enslaving them, we decided to do it covertly”
Thank you so much muhqtardtho for that yutube of Dinesh. I screenshot the list of amendments and sent it to my posse, some of them more recently awake. It's time this whole nation wakes up to which political party perpetuated slavery and racism. They profit from in so many ways. DESPICABLE.
Glad you guys found it helpful. I copy paste it here when the topic comes up but it rarely gets much interaction. It was one of the first red pills my homie from the boards ever sent me. It's kind of wild to think of how long I've known him before he helped me wake up.
Yeah. However, I am sure Trump learnt from his experience as well. Trump is the product of decades of fighting by the best of the white hats against Cabal. He is the embodiment of all the lessons learnt. When the final picture is unveiled, everyone who survived until then are the most luckiest people in the human history, for they get to see the true glory.
Just to add to the list, women’s suffrage was also a Republican movement.
Democrats are the party of misery, enslavement, totalitarianism, and evil.
“But Based Citizen, Republicans have done stupid shit too!”
I know, and valid point. However, that has always been the result of a person or group of persons and usually small in comparison. Democrats, as a party, have been at the root of nearly every large scale set back to the United States of America. Slavery, Civil War, World Wars, central banking, great depression, and now national election fraud and global bio-warfare.
In my opinion, we made a very big mistake by not destroying their party after the Civil War. An error that still costs us dearly today.
Everything they've gotten away with thus far, because they own the PR Agencies and all corporate spokes holes. Same as the disinformation they've pumped out on covid. Brain Wash
The only thing dividing the FBI and CIA is a definition on paper somewhere.
These ass hats trade sides like it’s musical chairs.
They kill and I am past defining who it was and the specifics outside of traitorous assholes killing people. The more valuable to Good the person - the faster and more brutal the assassination.
They haven’t held back since the 50s - that’s all I know. Hell Oklahoma City was about covering up Clinton / CIA Corruption and destroying the Evidence that was all tossed into the Murrah building - just so it could be cleanly destroyed. All with Comey, Holder, Brennan, Clintons, Bush Family, and plenty more all dancing victory after children had their heads blown off and through cement walls.
You are right, the job of FBI and CIA is pretty much crime scene cleanup, creating new criminals and fostering wars. Very thin line between who does what. These monsters need to be exposed fully. Newly woken up, hurting people are their punishment.
Honestly the truth is that if we were to remove Secret Police and the guise of National Security - we could easily see most of their Balkanization negated.
If you take away the ability for someone to create a narrative - suddenly reality begins to matter again.
In fact the FBI itself was formed much in the way that Homeland Security was - Elites assassinated William McKinley and mutated a Federal Agency that had only power enough to provide local authorities with information - then used that to sieze and centralize power.
That’s always the model.
Start a fire.
Centralize power.
So by 1908 we had the FBI out there putting pressure on various people to help create the Federal Reserve. Why? The Bankers needed control of money so they could fund what they wanted with someone else paying the bill.
It’s like health Insurance. Insurance Companies ran out of market space so they lobbied to create a mechanism so taxpayers could foot the bill. Then they were free to speculate, inflate prices, reduce the quality of care - and the formula is yo increasingly destroy that quality of care until one day Big Pharma is feeding children sugar fat in and day out knowing they will have a customer for life as that kid gets diabetes, cancer, depression, heart disease, and more. Hell they even looked forward to inevitable amputations.
I don't think Democrats even like MLK one little bit.
MLK dreamt of a world where treat each based on the content of our character rather than the color of our skin.
They hate that.
They think blacks, asians, gays and transgender should all vote for Democrats just because of their race or who they like to have sex with or pretend to be.
This is the basis of 'intersectionality'.
Your ideas, character, logic has no place in their calculation.
It actually harms us because we sit around talking about how “stupid” they are instead of realizing the very real, cognizant and coordinated evil they represent.
If our enemy were really HALF as stupid as some people say, we wouldn’t be in the situation we are right now.
No; our enemy is anything but stupid - they are cunning and satanically evil, but also ruthless.
There are plenty of stupid democrats, for certain; but the real puppet masters are quite intelligent - and pure, unfettered evil - which is what makes them so dangerous.
Either way; I get your point, understand & agree; fundamentally it's not about R vs D - we all know how many "republicans" stabbed Trump - and we, his supporters, in the back, or did nothing while he was attacked & betrayed, which is just as bad.
I remember when the History Channel ads for "Black History Month" replaced the MLK voice clip with one from Obama. Even my sleepy-ass mom was like "WTF?"
Maybe that’s just the statistics playing out or maybe you are looking in the wrong places. Plenty of squared away black folks who don’t go out like that e.g. Thomas Sowell, Larry Elder, Morgan Freeman, the list goes on. Most hollyweirdos and sportsball players are hardly good examples of male role models regardless of race
Who wants to wager [they] offed MLK to advance [their] Uncle Tom's, namely Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. They were relative no names until MLK's assassination. And yeah, James Earl Ray was a Dem.
Sidenote, the message of a large amount of rap directed at white college girls is to seek out the most criminal gang member they can find and date/sleep with him. Who is behind this consistent message? I don't think it's black people and it has nothing to do with creating unity.
Let’s also remember that all of the horrible stuff we found out about his personal life came directly from the FBI/CIA. The spied on him. I’m actually starting to wonder if any of that stuff was real and if maybe they smeared a man as a whore monger and a communist who didn’t deserve it? I don’t know. All I know is, all that crappy information we got about him that made him look bad came directly from them.
same group that killed lincoln, kennedy and ghandi too, among countless others. Minecraft has taught me that it takes much longer to build something up than to tear it down. Thats why you have to ban the griefers completely.
MLK stood for everything the left is against. He believed in God. He believed in peace. He believed in equal rights for all. He believed in the rights of the unborn. He believed in America. He was murdered for those beliefs. Today he would be cancelled and probably jailed.
Even more importantly, he was a jew-owned, communist, plagiarist, adulterer. He was a total fraud and no amount of POC in MAGA hats makes the 60s okay.
edit: it's all true - https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/levison-stanley-david - In 1956 Stanley Levison, a Jewish attorney from New York, began raising funds to support the Montgomery bus boycott and became acquainted with Martin Luther King, Jr. The two men developed a close relationship in which Levison not only advised King, but also aided him with the day-to-day administrative demands of the movement. In 1963, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) used King’s relationship with Levison, who they believed to be a Communist functionary, to justify surveillance of King.
Who do you think owned the Republican Party and the Civil Rights Movement? FFS the GOP has been Jew controlled since Teddy. The GOP has been controlled opp for a loooooong time. The De Facto owner of the GOP up until he died recently was Sheldon Adelson lol. Who do you think has ALWAYS been behind “civil rights” and social conflict.
Here is a start. There are better sources. I’m lazy and don’t feel like digging into my MEGA archive at midnight. But dig. You’ll find it. The CIA and FBI and NGOs and the media and the doctrinal managers of the university system have been playing both sides forever to keep us within one of two lines forever.
In 1956 Stanley Levison, a Jewish attorney from New York, began raising funds to support the Montgomery bus boycott and became acquainted with Martin Luther King, Jr. The two men developed a close relationship in which Levison not only advised King, but also aided him with the day-to-day administrative demands of the movement. In 1963, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) used King’s relationship with Levison, who they believed to be a Communist functionary, to justify surveillance of King.
I'm about to say something that will piss off almost everyone here, but I think it needs to be said.
The parties of the 1860s or even the 1960s are not the same as the parties we have today. So it's unfair to associate them, even if it makes you feel good to associate liberals with the KKK.
It's not that the parties "flipped". They simply changed over time. I see so many comments in places like this saying that the democrats today are all socialists and the republican party are all rinos. Obviously people can see that the parties have drastically changed in their lifetime. But then they want to turn around and say that the democrats now are the same as the 1860s. It's simply hypocritical.
Here are some things to ponder when you want to associate parties from the past to parties now. The Confederacy was almost exclusively Democrats. And it wasn't just the slave owners, but everyday citizens as well. The Confederate flag was a symbol of Democrats. Yet southerners today use the confederate flag as a symbol of their past and heritage. Why?Are they so very proud of the democrats in the past thet they ( who are overwhelmingly republican now) feel the need to fly it?
And when exactly did the south ( which was almost exclusively Democrats in the 1860s and 1960s) switch to largely Republican, as it is today? The same question can be asked about the Northeast, which was largely Republican then but is now heavily Democrat.
I'm not trying to blame the actions of the past on people today. Hopefully you don't use our slavery past to hate on white people or Christians ( who were the predominant people to own slaves). So don't be a hypocrite by using someone's political party. Even if it does make you feel better to stick it to a liberal. It's just hypocritical and wrong. There are plenty of things that democrats are doing RIGHT NOW that they can be called out on without it making you look like a hypocrite.
Alrighty, let's see how many people are going to get pissed off over this. I predict around 20.
Nobody is holding it against them for merely being Democrats. They're holding it against them because they're virtue signalling and pretending that the Democratic Party has always been some sort of bastion of freedom and diversity when it just isn't true. If anything, Democrats attempt to pin the blame for slavery on Republicans, and use this mythical idea of a "platform switch" to say that we should hate modern day Republicans.
Also, people merely disagreeing with you doesn't mean that they're "pissed" over anything you're saying lol.
But aren't we just as guilty of virtue signaling as they are?
Just look at this comment section and count the number of times people are condemning modern liberals because of what others were doing over 200 years ago.
And look at how heavily the Republican party has leaned on the "Party of Lincoln!" catch phrase. Yet they seem utterly oblivious to the fact that Lincoln established the first federal income tax (and taxing the wealthy at quite a higher rate than others), created the first large federal government departments (the Department of Agriculture I believe), and established government paid higher education (the Morris act, I think it was named.) Does any of that seem like something the Republican party would do and brag about today?).
The truth is that the Republican party of the past is not the Republican party of today. And the Democrat party of the past is not the Democrat party of today. It doesn't mean that the parties simply flipped sides. It's much more complicated than that.
The political parties evolve with the times. Social mores change. Culture changes. Priorities change.
So when anyone, liberal or conservative, tries to associate the parties of the past with the respective parties of now, it indicates a lack of knowledge and education of the matter.
I understand how obnoxious it is for liberals to virtue signal. But it's just as obnoxious for conservatives to do the same. I think the best course of action is not to say "Nuh-uh, you are!!" but to point out that people alive today are not responsible for the actions of people in the past.
The South switched to Republican because the Democrats no longer gave lip service to the Bible, God, and country and embraced infanticide AKA abortion.
The South is also less racist than it was when the Democrats were running the show.
The statue that Daniel describes with the head of gold comes to mind. I think each section of it represents a world kingdom; the head of gold obviously represents Nebuchadnezzar's kingdom. The feet of iron and clay represent the last. I'm wondering if the iron and clay represent America's political power structure between the left and right. Who is iron and who is clay?
The last kingdom is Rome and it's been around in some fashion or the other since the time of Christ. Its current version is the Roman Catholic Church and Satan is currently in open control.
About 10 years ago on this day, I got one of my ear cartilages pierced. No idea why I did it on MLK day but there it is. Maybe today I'll go get the other one done lol
MLK was a Republican and the nitwit democrats still believe the Republicans are the jim crow party....cant teach fucking stupid....Lincoln freed them he was Republican then the dummycrats formed the kkk to oppose him....cant teach fucking stupid......
Theynalways fact check with. “The parties switched platforms” - the dumbest explanation I have ever heard. What theyreally mean is “instead of outright enslaving them, we decided to do it covertly”
Debunking the mythical republican/democrat switch.
Dinesh is awesome.
He’s pretty good and i formative
Carol Swain does a good takedown of this also for prayer U. And she black, from Vanderbilt U
PRAGER University
She Black! -JLP
Thank you so much muhqtardtho for that yutube of Dinesh. I screenshot the list of amendments and sent it to my posse, some of them more recently awake. It's time this whole nation wakes up to which political party perpetuated slavery and racism. They profit from in so many ways. DESPICABLE.
The Inconvenient Truth About the Democratic Party Prayer university https://youtu.be/g_a7dQXilCo
Glad you guys found it helpful. I copy paste it here when the topic comes up but it rarely gets much interaction. It was one of the first red pills my homie from the boards ever sent me. It's kind of wild to think of how long I've known him before he helped me wake up.
Great takedown of this trope.
Bookmarked for posterity… thank you!
TY for that…great video 👍🏽
"Hey, Rocky! Watch me pull a rabbit outta my hat!"
Again!?!?
Wrong hat!! 😂
Now here's something we hope you'll really like.
Aahhh…the good ol daze. 💕
Is that hat a portal to Africa?
Then why are they still pushing segregation today. Did they switch back again
Its a schroedingers racist party
The Inconvenient Truth About the Democratic Party Prayer university https://youtu.be/g_a7dQXilCo
he woukd have been turning in his grave, watching his son go full BLM
Yeah. However, I am sure Trump learnt from his experience as well. Trump is the product of decades of fighting by the best of the white hats against Cabal. He is the embodiment of all the lessons learnt. When the final picture is unveiled, everyone who survived until then are the most luckiest people in the human history, for they get to see the true glory.
You can teach stupid. See school district of any large metro area.
Yeah, how to be more ignorant!
Just to add to the list, women’s suffrage was also a Republican movement.
Democrats are the party of misery, enslavement, totalitarianism, and evil.
“But Based Citizen, Republicans have done stupid shit too!”
I know, and valid point. However, that has always been the result of a person or group of persons and usually small in comparison. Democrats, as a party, have been at the root of nearly every large scale set back to the United States of America. Slavery, Civil War, World Wars, central banking, great depression, and now national election fraud and global bio-warfare.
In my opinion, we made a very big mistake by not destroying their party after the Civil War. An error that still costs us dearly today.
One wonders how much differently it would've gone had Lincoln lived.
Lib inlaws believe in the “party switch” so what were dems are now republicans and vice versa lol
Fucking stupid
Everything they've gotten away with thus far, because they own the PR Agencies and all corporate spokes holes. Same as the disinformation they've pumped out on covid. Brain Wash
Ask them if they believe FDR was the greatest Republican President. Watch the gears turn.
The Resident voted on Jim Crow iirc
CIA specifically
The only thing dividing the FBI and CIA is a definition on paper somewhere.
These ass hats trade sides like it’s musical chairs.
They kill and I am past defining who it was and the specifics outside of traitorous assholes killing people. The more valuable to Good the person - the faster and more brutal the assassination.
They haven’t held back since the 50s - that’s all I know. Hell Oklahoma City was about covering up Clinton / CIA Corruption and destroying the Evidence that was all tossed into the Murrah building - just so it could be cleanly destroyed. All with Comey, Holder, Brennan, Clintons, Bush Family, and plenty more all dancing victory after children had their heads blown off and through cement walls.
Fucking monsters.
You are right, the job of FBI and CIA is pretty much crime scene cleanup, creating new criminals and fostering wars. Very thin line between who does what. These monsters need to be exposed fully. Newly woken up, hurting people are their punishment.
Honestly the truth is that if we were to remove Secret Police and the guise of National Security - we could easily see most of their Balkanization negated.
If you take away the ability for someone to create a narrative - suddenly reality begins to matter again.
In fact the FBI itself was formed much in the way that Homeland Security was - Elites assassinated William McKinley and mutated a Federal Agency that had only power enough to provide local authorities with information - then used that to sieze and centralize power.
That’s always the model.
Start a fire.
Centralize power.
So by 1908 we had the FBI out there putting pressure on various people to help create the Federal Reserve. Why? The Bankers needed control of money so they could fund what they wanted with someone else paying the bill.
It’s like health Insurance. Insurance Companies ran out of market space so they lobbied to create a mechanism so taxpayers could foot the bill. Then they were free to speculate, inflate prices, reduce the quality of care - and the formula is yo increasingly destroy that quality of care until one day Big Pharma is feeding children sugar fat in and day out knowing they will have a customer for life as that kid gets diabetes, cancer, depression, heart disease, and more. Hell they even looked forward to inevitable amputations.
But I think King was CIA too, warring factions like now maybe
3 letters had infiltrated his movement for sure, but he was not CIA
I don't think Democrats even like MLK one little bit.
MLK dreamt of a world where treat each based on the content of our character rather than the color of our skin.
They hate that.
They think blacks, asians, gays and transgender should all vote for Democrats just because of their race or who they like to have sex with or pretend to be.
This is the basis of 'intersectionality'.
Your ideas, character, logic has no place in their calculation.
It annoys them deeply to think that it should.
CRT is the opposite of what MLK taught.
Dems have no ability to think through ideas, or to debate/defend their ideas.
That's why ad hominem comes so naturally to them. It is their only option.
Please do not underestimate our enemy.
It actually harms us because we sit around talking about how “stupid” they are instead of realizing the very real, cognizant and coordinated evil they represent.
If our enemy were really HALF as stupid as some people say, we wouldn’t be in the situation we are right now.
No; our enemy is anything but stupid - they are cunning and satanically evil, but also ruthless.
There are plenty of stupid democrats, for certain; but the real puppet masters are quite intelligent - and pure, unfettered evil - which is what makes them so dangerous.
Please do not underestimate this isn't about Democrats vs. Republicans.
Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney are just as evil.
I literally didn't use the words "republican" nor "democrat" in my entire post.
I think you miss MY point..... :-)
I literally didn't use the words "republican" nor "democrat" in my entire post.
I think you need to review what literally means.
Wow major facepalm time.....LOL.
Either way; I get your point, understand & agree; fundamentally it's not about R vs D - we all know how many "republicans" stabbed Trump - and we, his supporters, in the back, or did nothing while he was attacked & betrayed, which is just as bad.
I remember when the History Channel ads for "Black History Month" replaced the MLK voice clip with one from Obama. Even my sleepy-ass mom was like "WTF?"
they do not like any strong black male role model. they either end up mysteriously dead, get charged with murder, rape, heavily medicated or run off.
the ones that stick around end up cucked out.
Maybe that’s just the statistics playing out or maybe you are looking in the wrong places. Plenty of squared away black folks who don’t go out like that e.g. Thomas Sowell, Larry Elder, Morgan Freeman, the list goes on. Most hollyweirdos and sportsball players are hardly good examples of male role models regardless of race
And Malcom X.
Once Malcom said liberals were the most evil and racist people on the planet, he had to go.
MLK wasn't a liberal
Who wants to wager [they] offed MLK to advance [their] Uncle Tom's, namely Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. They were relative no names until MLK's assassination. And yeah, James Earl Ray was a Dem.
thank you. I also reminded people what Q had to say on it, but hey we're "forum sliders" now
They’re just projecting. Stormfags are sitting in a puddle of CIA disinformation. Have a good day
What did Q say?
https://qalerts.app/?n=1252
Thanks!
It's White college girls going into ghetto shit holes with brooms and garbage bags to virtue signal on social media day.
Sidenote, the message of a large amount of rap directed at white college girls is to seek out the most criminal gang member they can find and date/sleep with him. Who is behind this consistent message? I don't think it's black people and it has nothing to do with creating unity.
MLK and other republicans fought for the rights of all African Americans, despite democrat attempts to block them.
Let’s also remember that all of the horrible stuff we found out about his personal life came directly from the FBI/CIA. The spied on him. I’m actually starting to wonder if any of that stuff was real and if maybe they smeared a man as a whore monger and a communist who didn’t deserve it? I don’t know. All I know is, all that crappy information we got about him that made him look bad came directly from them.
Ya mean in between bangin' whores?
Ziiing, haha yep
Oh, good grief. He wasn’t a great man, but granted he’s the best they’ve got.
same group that killed lincoln, kennedy and ghandi too, among countless others. Minecraft has taught me that it takes much longer to build something up than to tear it down. Thats why you have to ban the griefers completely.
MLK stood for everything the left is against. He believed in God. He believed in peace. He believed in equal rights for all. He believed in the rights of the unborn. He believed in America. He was murdered for those beliefs. Today he would be cancelled and probably jailed.
Even more importantly, he was a jew-owned, communist, plagiarist, adulterer. He was a total fraud and no amount of POC in MAGA hats makes the 60s okay.
Jew owned? Go on please.
edit: it's all true - https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/levison-stanley-david - In 1956 Stanley Levison, a Jewish attorney from New York, began raising funds to support the Montgomery bus boycott and became acquainted with Martin Luther King, Jr. The two men developed a close relationship in which Levison not only advised King, but also aided him with the day-to-day administrative demands of the movement. In 1963, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) used King’s relationship with Levison, who they believed to be a Communist functionary, to justify surveillance of King.
Who do you think owned the Republican Party and the Civil Rights Movement? FFS the GOP has been Jew controlled since Teddy. The GOP has been controlled opp for a loooooong time. The De Facto owner of the GOP up until he died recently was Sheldon Adelson lol. Who do you think has ALWAYS been behind “civil rights” and social conflict.
Well yeah but I was wondering if you had a more specific answer. If you know who his handlers were, I'm interested!
https://theamericancitadel.com/2018/01/15/mlk-communist-revolutionary-plagiarizer-degenerate/
Here is a start. There are better sources. I’m lazy and don’t feel like digging into my MEGA archive at midnight. But dig. You’ll find it. The CIA and FBI and NGOs and the media and the doctrinal managers of the university system have been playing both sides forever to keep us within one of two lines forever.
https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/levison-stanley-david
Well, well, well...
When I say every single time, I mean every single time brother dot jpg
Thank you!
Demos also claim to despise Nazis, but half of them are for putting the unvaxxed in camps. https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/01/17/data-nearly-50-of-democrat-voters-want-camps-for-the-unvaccinated/
I'm about to say something that will piss off almost everyone here, but I think it needs to be said.
The parties of the 1860s or even the 1960s are not the same as the parties we have today. So it's unfair to associate them, even if it makes you feel good to associate liberals with the KKK.
It's not that the parties "flipped". They simply changed over time. I see so many comments in places like this saying that the democrats today are all socialists and the republican party are all rinos. Obviously people can see that the parties have drastically changed in their lifetime. But then they want to turn around and say that the democrats now are the same as the 1860s. It's simply hypocritical.
Here are some things to ponder when you want to associate parties from the past to parties now. The Confederacy was almost exclusively Democrats. And it wasn't just the slave owners, but everyday citizens as well. The Confederate flag was a symbol of Democrats. Yet southerners today use the confederate flag as a symbol of their past and heritage. Why?Are they so very proud of the democrats in the past thet they ( who are overwhelmingly republican now) feel the need to fly it?
And when exactly did the south ( which was almost exclusively Democrats in the 1860s and 1960s) switch to largely Republican, as it is today? The same question can be asked about the Northeast, which was largely Republican then but is now heavily Democrat.
I'm not trying to blame the actions of the past on people today. Hopefully you don't use our slavery past to hate on white people or Christians ( who were the predominant people to own slaves). So don't be a hypocrite by using someone's political party. Even if it does make you feel better to stick it to a liberal. It's just hypocritical and wrong. There are plenty of things that democrats are doing RIGHT NOW that they can be called out on without it making you look like a hypocrite.
Alrighty, let's see how many people are going to get pissed off over this. I predict around 20.
On your mark. Get set. Go!
Nobody is holding it against them for merely being Democrats. They're holding it against them because they're virtue signalling and pretending that the Democratic Party has always been some sort of bastion of freedom and diversity when it just isn't true. If anything, Democrats attempt to pin the blame for slavery on Republicans, and use this mythical idea of a "platform switch" to say that we should hate modern day Republicans.
Also, people merely disagreeing with you doesn't mean that they're "pissed" over anything you're saying lol.
But aren't we just as guilty of virtue signaling as they are?
Just look at this comment section and count the number of times people are condemning modern liberals because of what others were doing over 200 years ago.
And look at how heavily the Republican party has leaned on the "Party of Lincoln!" catch phrase. Yet they seem utterly oblivious to the fact that Lincoln established the first federal income tax (and taxing the wealthy at quite a higher rate than others), created the first large federal government departments (the Department of Agriculture I believe), and established government paid higher education (the Morris act, I think it was named.) Does any of that seem like something the Republican party would do and brag about today?).
The truth is that the Republican party of the past is not the Republican party of today. And the Democrat party of the past is not the Democrat party of today. It doesn't mean that the parties simply flipped sides. It's much more complicated than that.
The political parties evolve with the times. Social mores change. Culture changes. Priorities change.
So when anyone, liberal or conservative, tries to associate the parties of the past with the respective parties of now, it indicates a lack of knowledge and education of the matter.
I understand how obnoxious it is for liberals to virtue signal. But it's just as obnoxious for conservatives to do the same. I think the best course of action is not to say "Nuh-uh, you are!!" but to point out that people alive today are not responsible for the actions of people in the past.
The South switched to Republican because the Democrats no longer gave lip service to the Bible, God, and country and embraced infanticide AKA abortion.
The South is also less racist than it was when the Democrats were running the show.
Dinesh D'Souza Debunks the Myth of the "Switch" between Republicans and Democrat Party - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol7OMGBDMao
Dinesh D'Souza has a whole movie about this.
Dinesh D'Souza Debunks the Myth of the "Switch" between Republicans and Democrat Party - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol7OMGBDMao
Does this mean in 100% they will be celebrating Trumps BD? 😂
I also have a dream.
The statue that Daniel describes with the head of gold comes to mind. I think each section of it represents a world kingdom; the head of gold obviously represents Nebuchadnezzar's kingdom. The feet of iron and clay represent the last. I'm wondering if the iron and clay represent America's political power structure between the left and right. Who is iron and who is clay?
The last kingdom is Rome and it's been around in some fashion or the other since the time of Christ. Its current version is the Roman Catholic Church and Satan is currently in open control.
About 10 years ago on this day, I got one of my ear cartilages pierced. No idea why I did it on MLK day but there it is. Maybe today I'll go get the other one done lol