The way I see it is as follows...
Multiple people have pointed out that the sheer number of vaccines made with this new technology that were being sent out was absolutely staggering.
People have, quite understandably, questioned how it was even possible to make such an incredible number of them in such a short period of time.
Other people have also observed that about 5% of the batches contain over 90% of the adverse effects.
There's a logical reason for this. The logical reason is they obviously could not produce enough of their poison death shots to kill off as many of the American population as they wanted.
Trump flooded the system with fake ones with Operation Warpspeed. 95% of the vaccine batches were much more safe. Maybe they were a real vaccine, maybe they were saline, who knows? But they were definitely different, and much less deadly.
Trump totally scrambled their system by flooding it with fake vaccines for a fake pandemic. Once people got the safe fake shot, they would no longer be motivated to go take the real poison death shot. By the time most people had gotten 1-2 shots, and boosters came around, and restrictions came back, they woke up, and refused to get boosters en-masse.
Now that (most) people are convinced they're safe, either because they were never worried or because they trust their first two shots, or they had it already, mandates and pushing additional boosters is a largely losing argument.
The deep state was still able to do some damage, in the end. They produced some of their poison death shots and used everything they had, because they knew they were locked into their plan, but it wasn't enough to accomplish their goal, only enough to expose themselves.
What do you guys think?
I like this theory. Plausible and hopeful.
But... numbers don't lie. There is a 40 percent increase in the all-cause death rate according to life insurance companies. I guess simple math will work... how many shots were in the 5 percent of the batches? And, how does that number compare to the number represented by a 40 percent increase in all-cause mortality (lets say extrapolated over 5 years)? I don't have the numbers, but those are my questions.
5 percent of billions is a lot.
I was just thinking of the US... are the bad batches worlwide? Were the batches billions of doses?
I suspect it was more than 95% placebo.
Yet Trump is priding himself by comparing against a scenario where it was 0% placebo spread out over many more years than two. Good point, but also one guaranteed to look sterling by comparison with what didn't happen.
What's important is this is a testable theory. He does things by the book. Somewhere there must be a lot of documents indicating permission to use placebos, nature of the "testing" protocol, etc. Maybe he convinced pharma that the EUA could count toward being one of the necessary tests prior to full certification; they've probably pulled that stunt before. Somewhere there is a protocol, a smoking gun, a study that one can read between the lines, another treasure to dig for.
Bear in mind that he said the military was in charge of distribution initially (when he was still publicly POTUS).
I really like what you've suggested. We can only pray and dig.
great questions.
Also keep in mind, 40% increase in death rate among younger people doesn't mean 40% of all young people are dying. Normally young people are not supposed to be dying left and right. So you don't have to kill off a really massive chunk of the population before you start seeing those kinds of numbers...
I remember a nurse in NY being fired (arrested?) Because she administered 8600 doses of saline instead of vax poison.
I cannot believe she was the only one to do this.
There were many stories worldwide of saline injection. I dont think it was logistically possible to make 1 billion doses of premium mrna dna scrambler when they said they had them unless covid was preplanned before march 2020.
allegedly they were making the vax since 2015 under Obama and stock piling it along with the "test kits". This hoax was being planned for decades.
Good theory. It would explain "Yes, I received the vaccine." And it would explain "I'm proud of the vaccine. It has saved millions of lives." Also would make sense with the overturned truck that spilled and had high security cleanup, as the operation itself would be more important than the spilled material. 5% is within the cryptic "4-6% lost forever" message, fwiw.
Does not match with the scientists who have theoretically examined vials and found strange things inside. Also many people have reported the shots are painful and "knock them out" for a day or two... this could be psychological, a negative placebo effect, but I know many people for whom this pain was very real, which doesn't match a saline injection. (They could add something for that effect, though.)
I'm on the fence. Deserves discussion; will check. Thanks for posting!
It does match if those scientists examined batches which were actually the contaminated ones.
Also gives lots of cover for black hates to fabricate lots of studies that claim it's safe...
This, alone, is the only thing that has made sense to me. Great post. I sure hope you are right.
It would kind of make sense. My idealism says "Why not just tell the truth? Tell people it's poison, show your sources, you have a duty to be upfront with people." But that obviously assumes such a thing is possible and effective. We saw over the years how hobbled the Trump admin was with traitors in its midst, and how the media was able to twist reality and convince a lot of people Trump was literally Hitler. So maybe the straight shooting approach wouldn't actually have saved more lives in the end?
He told the truth with Ivermectin and Hydroxy and it did not go well (in the short term)
No it would not have. The deep state I believe still had a lot of power and who know what they would have done. Another 9/11, few planes coming down, who knows.
That's why I get irritated when even Ron Paul falls into the trap sometimes of calling Trump soft on the COVID thing and this is in spite of Paul also talking about the Deep State. Everyone just leaves out how Trump did tell us about other treatments early on and how demonized they got.
That is very true. The lying fake news attacked him.
If Trump told the truth, the vaccine would get pulled, and we lock down for 10 years while they make a "safe" one, Trump would be gone, America would be destroyed, and the vaccine would kill everyone anyway. It was the only effective way to completely disarm the coronavirus psyop.
I truly believe that they had hoped for a decade of lockdowns. The jab rollout caught them very off-guard and scrambling.
Maybe your theory could help explain why so many people had bad reactions (and even death) after the second shot.
Operation Warp Speed diluted the whole system of the planned lethal first shot with, say 95% saline doses.
Then Trump and his team were counting on a second term where they could extinguish the bio-engineered virus with approved EUA therapeutics, thus negating the need for any additional doses.
DS steals the election and now has the time, the money, and the power to make the subsequent doses more lethal in the long term like they planned from the very beginning.
I think devolution was the plan, however they counted on either or both of the following: A: Having contingency plans in place to ensure that they continue flooding society with the safe fake shots. B: Counting on people revolting and refusing to get vaxxed after their initial two shots.
I think the deep state was still continually producing lethal shots over this time, however white hats were likely flooding fake safe ones in, as well. People had more reactions after the second shot simply because some people were more resistant to it than others, so it took a second round for the damage to actually impact their lifestyle and become noticeable. Not all of the poisoned shots were poisoned equally, and not all of people's reactions were equal either.
Likely. Trump will show in the future that "these are not the jabs that I brought to the table" leading to "so what did you swamp creatures decide to put into the jabs and why?"
Yes, and as critical medical products that need to be stored in properly controlled conditions, these things are going to have very tight chain of custody record requirements.
How do you think people are going to feel if it is revealed that their lot numbers for their vaccine are either fake, or the records have been scrubbed?
Yeah but... so do ballots.
This is the only theory that doesn't require mental gymnastics. Could also explain why boosters are needed.
Except for the boosters and shots after he left and the fact that he continues to promote it and the fact that this is pure speculation
I don't recall him promoting boosters.
https://www.newsmax.com/amp/newsfront/booster-vaccine-mandates-covid-19-pandemic/2022/01/12/id/1052082/
I feel like some of the people I know who were vaxxed do not seem to be affected much. But we have known 3 deaths... a 39 year old mother of 4, a 36 year old father of a newborn and a 75 year old that got very aggressive cancer and died within 4 months. I don't know anyone that has horrific adverse effects. A few older people have declined somewhat but otherwise nothing too major and all my extended family got the clot shots and boosters. So this theory sounds plausible.
Did the people you know doe from the shot or did they get "covid" were admitted to the hospital and died while in the hospital? It gets tricky with the elderly because it wouldn't be totally off the wall that he just so happened to cancer. I hope this scenario is true.
The 39 year old is military wife and received Pfizer vaccine and died of heart attack after being sick for 2 weeks after getting the 2nd shot. The 36 year old died the same day after getting his 2nd vaccine...don't know the brand...autopsy pending for very long time. The 75 year old received J&J and after about 6 months was diagnosed with very aggressive lymphoma that was throughout his body but mainly in his brain and lungs. His vegetarian wife who was also very healthy is suffering from some medical issues they have yet to determine the cause or the treatment.
No covid for any of them.
No one in my family so far but I do know of some mysterious deaths at my company among some people in their 40's right around the time they were pushing the third shot.
Good thoughtful post
-Trump to Fox news host Maria Bartiromo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INH-CmCgIYs&t=12s
There have been ad studies showing Trump's endorsement of the vaccine increased uptake. There are two options: Trump was unaware of how unsafe the vaccines were before his endorsement or he was aware and intentionally encouraged people to take it.
If you knew 5% of the jelly beans within the package were cyanide, would you still sell it to people? If Trump's Operation Warp Speed plan was to simply mitigate damage, why endorse the vaccine at all?
I don't think Trump, 5d chess player 'stable genius', would be ignorant to the very vaccines he prided himself on creating. He is much too smart for that. I believe Trump knew of the side effects and pushed them out. I believe he did it for "the greater good". I believe he did it to save America.
-DJT March 2014 Tweet
-DJT October 2012 Tweet
https://www.historyofvaccines.org/trump-and-vaccines
It is projected that 1 in 3 children will have autism by 2035. There will be no future for this country if we allow that to happen. What is the best way to wake sheeple up to the dangers of vaccines? Telling them gets you nowhere, it's unfortunate, but you have to show them. He turned the cabal's depop agenda into a controlled demolition/awakening experience for America. It could have been a lot worse if the deep state had total control. But the damage from the vaccines could have been non-existent or at the very least not encouraged by Trump, leading to less deaths/injuries, but then we'd still be on the road to ruin. This was all done by design. For example, how many of you reading this thought childhood vaccines were fine before the Covid vax? How many of you have changed your mind since?
Like many I had no anti-vaxx tendencies until they tried to mandate this obvious medical trial onto all of us.
I also used to think anti-vaxxers were exaggerating until I found out that kids these days get over 10x as many shots as I ever had growing up in the 80s and 90s. Also remember when many of the anti-vaxxers were lefties and Jim Carey was among the celebrity ones?
Yes I do haha. Also back in the day if you strived to eat clean and non-GMO you were stigmatized as a leftie. Now the lefties are GMO! Ultimate irony.
I want to believe this for sure--for everyone who got a shot--especially for anyone I know. Thank you!
Its certainly possible, there was a story of a canadian military officer in charge of vaccine rollout who was pushed out of his role for "sexual misconduct". Like what? did he put his foot on the womans face or fishhook her butthole? illegal sex moves? why does the military care about their officers sexual conduct. And why did his illegal sex moves force him out of vaccine logistics in the middle of a super spooky pandemic. I wondered if he was a whitehat or a blackhat. I suspect he was a whitehat because sexual misconduct seems like a convenient way to push someone out without telling the world the real reason. I think he was replaced by a woman who seems more obedient. Then came the stories of tainted vaccine batches that had to be destroyed, I wonder if those tainted vaccines were actually good or bad batches. I also wonder why the military was in charge of vaccine distribution at all.
Adultery is an offense against the military code of justice because such things, or any inappropriate sexual actions, can really degrade the morale of troops (would you lay down your life in action for the guy who slept with your wife?) And it can open up troops to possible blackmail. The military also has a duty to protect the women in its ranks amidst a mainly male dominated field. These are just a couple of quick reasons why any military should and typically does care about the sexual behavior of its troops.
There certainly seems to be some correlation between higher adverse reactions in certain states within the USA, to back up this thinking. Other countries are not broken down as clearly between red and blue states so it is harder to tell.
I know quite a few who appear to have suffered from reactions to the coof juice, and yet many that have experienced nothing. A close friend has had serious heart issues yet her BF got the injections at the same time and experienced nothing.
Trump was still saying the vaccines were good in an interview in the last 6 months! I don't understand that part and I don't understand Joseph Flynn saying everyone that thinks the "white Hats" are in control needs to get their head out of their butts AND General Flynn retweeting it. Got a theory on that?
This generally has been my theory as to how things went down as well. Another thing that I would add is that this absolves Trump of guilt to a certain degree for pushing the jabs. If it is proven that the pharma companies tainted the Warp Speed shots after Trump left office, then the blame falls squarely in their lap for all of the deaths and adverse effects (and in the laps of the Potato Regime and their FDA that covered for them).
I am not a lawyer, but as I understand, it also should remove any potential legal shielding they may have had, because fraud negates any immunity that pharma companies have with regards to experimental drugs.
This also goes a ways towards explaining why they were so desperate to have Trump condemn the shots. They needed to be able to say that the jabs were ineffective and/or dangerous (so we could go back into 5-10 years of lockdowns until a "real" vaccine could be completed), but they could not do so themselves.
The first vaccines became available Dec. 2020, before Trump left office. Are you saying the first two months of vaccines were different than the rest?
would certainly put a new perspective to the 4-6% lost forever
I am never sure why people think that producing a large number of vaccines is so difficult. Most of it is water and even if you include the water the average is about half a millilitre per shot.
So: 8 billion people * 0.5 ml * 4 shots = 16 million litres.
That may sound a lot but the US alone drinks over 50 billion litres of soft drinks each year.
I like it.
How sad. Suck evil in this world.
Pfizer was never part of operation warpped.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220324103942/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/10/health/was-the-pfizer-vaccine-part-of-the-governments-operation-warp-speed.html
Some people have speculated, that being part of the program would result in oversight that Pfizer did not want. For example, making the ingredients known, which are still secret until this day.
In addition, the bad batches appear to be Pfizer experimenting on the people taking the vaccine. From people who took and analyzed the data, they appear to happen in very controlled ways. In addition, each batch of Pfizer has different ingredients. That is not normal for a medication. One of the main goals for a medication is that each vile contains the same thing. And it seems this is not by accident.
Keep also in mind that Trump has spoken against Pfizer and their vaccine. He might very well know more about them than we do. Operation Warp Speed was perhaps created to generate a safe medication before the companies that created the virus and were working on the vaccine would deploy their vaccine, that could appear to work while slowly killing the recipients.
In addition, Trump has said that there is no reason for children to get any vaccine, which is actually consistent with the science. And he has also been clear that people should chose whether to get the vaccine or not.
The unfortunate thing is, even many people on the right trust the vaccines. It may very well be that Trump could not at that time reveal what was actually going on as the brainwashing would have removed to many supporters. Some people had to be shown, not told. He tried to push hydroxychloroquine which is a far better option than any vaccine, and look how the MSM was able to discredit a drug that works. Ivermectin is suppressed until this very day. He may have thought he could not take the direct approach and perhaps used project Warp Speed to try to minimize the damage.
I also remember Merck pulling out entirely early on. Also other than to drum out people why was the military brass pushing the big pharma juice on personnel if they knew they had their own internally developed one coming soon? Actually have we heard much more about that one since it was revealed last fall?
If it's true what Pfizer said, that you can catch the vaccine from the vaccinated through shedding contact or whatever then I guess it's just a matter of time.