I suspect they are hiding ingredients by splitting them out into separate chemicals and molecules, so they can say "it's just these things here!!" but combined, it is something completely different. They have AI powerful enough to do this, make a list of all "potential substances" that could be formed from a list of ingredients, then they could selectively use substances in place of ingredients to hide what it actually is. E.g. the building blocks are mundane, but added together, are some real deadly ingredients.
Probably why some of them needed to be frozen until injection. If the reaction starts outside of the body, it would be too obvious what they're putting in people's bodies.
I've been buying my older coworker Menthol Newports for the past year now since his state banned them. Guy hasn't been to the doctor in 30+ years, and drinks 5-6 Molsens every night. He hasn't been sick in years.
Me, been sick twice in the past 3 months but the kids bring illnesses home from school regularly.
I'm not advocating his lifestyle, but something doesn't add up. 🤷♂️
I knew several old guys in my hometown who started smoking at 16, multiple packs a day, and died of a car accident or some other farm accident in their mid to late 90's. One guy was in his mud 80's and would sit on his porch and take a drag off his cigarette, and then put his oxygen mask back on for a second, and then switch it back and forth till he had smoked through his pack. He only got the oxygen lit on fire a few times. LoL. My belief is that some of us are built to withstand more shit than others. Genetics, upbringing, environment, etc. I've known some pretty frail older guys, and some old guys that were built like clydesdales.
Grandpa got started in the army air corps in WWII. they'd have coke and Hershey chocolate for the guys when they came back from a mission. Only coke and Hershey chocolate in grandpas house after that. I drink prodigious amounts of coke to this day lol
That's awesome. Your granny was obviously born before the tidal wave of vaccines started being pushed on everyone in the 60's and 70's, she likely avoided others as their home remedies (like daily cod liver oil) worked so well in her family.
My coworker had a traumatizing experience as a kid in the dentist chair and NEVER went to any doctor again afterward. No shots, no dentist, no nurses, nuffin.
Same, mentally filed it in the "that's odd" category. When I mentioned the smoking bit to the family, one of them said (of the smokers), "See, I knew it would be good for something."
See, now this makes sense. SARS has homology with snake venom. This does not surprise me. No "venom in the water to poison" necessary (which is a statement that makes NO sense on the face of it).
That's my take. The info was coming out, and Stew Peters got the job to tank it by dunking the convo into municipal water supply, fortune cookies and the pope. The other interviewers have done much better.
No venom in the water to poison necessary because the vaccinated are releasing the venom into the water naturally when they flush the toilet. We are all drinking everyone else's drugs, hormone treatments, birth control pills, Viagra. Think hard about it and don't drink the water!
Of course you are, they aren't making water. They 'treat' it, and they enhance it, and they meet certain thresholds for cleanliness that they don't explain to you; but it starts out as sewage.
You are a living example of the bad effects of paranoia. Municipal water systems start with water from a natural source (lake, aquifer), filter it to keep the bad stuff out, add some chlorite or peroxide to sterilize it, and then it is supplied for human consumption. The sewage is treated to get the organics down to simple molecules so it can be flushed into the environment. We do not drink sewage.
This is a protein that binds to the same receptors as a particular snake venom because of homology (the reactive site has protein similarity). It was almost certainly by design. What it is not is a "venom" it's a "virus." Not that the distinction here is all that important, but "anti-venom" has nothing to do with it specifically. Anti-venom is a specific monoclonal antibody that binds to a specific protein region. Monoclonal antibodies are very specific. In the case of SARS, you can have many different monoclonal antibodies that will work (binds to different parts of the SARS-CoV-2 virion). If the particular one for the snake venom also works on SARS that's great (though I'd be surprised if it works very well since the similar region is not large).
There are also many other treatments that can be used on a virus though, not just monoclonal antibodies. Things like HCQ, Ivermectin, etc. are likely even better than monoclonal antibodies (not to downplay its effectiveness).
what sucks is that I've seen so many people here dismiss the whole thing because it in no possible way be "snake venom"...well yeah duh! But who ever said it was snake venom? Why were people here even spreading that? Common deep state tactic (which the Devil does too) is you take the truth and you twist it just a little, and when you're just one degree off, then one mile down the road you are way off from the truth. "Eat the fish but spit out the bones" is how I approach all information.
I've seen so many people here dismiss the whole thing because it in no possible way be "snake venom"
I'm not sure if that's true. I personally dismissed "venom to poison the water", which many others did as well. And in truth, I didn't really "dismiss it," I asked for source evidence that wasn't Stew Peters and got downvoted into oblivion for not believing he was an automatic truthsayer. I never said it was impossible that SARS might have homology with snake venom, in fact I said that was quite possible.
RIght, I understand people HERE have been saying that, but that's why it's a problem because people obviously didn't watch the videos and read the articles. I meant to say that none of those who did the research and published the videos said it was literally snake venom. I suppose it's a matter of semantics, but it isn't literally snake venom. I guess it's kind of like the Covid "vaccine", like technically it is in no way a vaccine in the same sense that the traditional vaccines are but we use the same term to define it because in the general application it is one. People get so hung up on semantics haha, and I wouldn't normally care but when facts are confused with theories, semantics unfortunately DO matter. Cheers bruh! :)
People get so hung up on semantics haha, and I wouldn't normally care but when facts are confused with theories, semantics unfortunately DO matter.
I used to get upset with people for arguing semantics with me and not appreciating my "obvious intent." In truth, I still do. :)
But words literally (I mean that literally (i.e. the literal definition of literal)) create our world; at least the human part of it. The strict definition of words and the sentence structure (grammar) used to string them together puts strict boundaries on our actions, thoughts, beliefs, reality, truth (lower case reality/truth, not Reality/Truth upper case).
Semantics matter. They matter a great deal. Once you start to see how The Matrix is created, you see that nothing matters more, at least with respect to understanding it and countering the brainwashing.
Of course, it's just a protein. It is only effective as a toxin if it is injected into the bloodstream though. That is the definition of "venom": an injected toxin.
I mean, it's theoretically possible such a protein could have a partial effect if swallowed in large enough quantities, but the stomach will break it down, so it will probably have no effect at all, especially in small quantities like a "poisoned water supply."
Could it cross the blood brain barrier though, say by shoving a giant swab all the way down ones nose, or by injecting a "vaccine" incorrectly and getting into the blood stream? We were told it wasn't a leaky vaccine, however this has been proved absolutely incorrect.
I'm just thinking out loud here. It was one of my first questions, "I thought venom had to be direct into the blood stream" and not just via a third party, ie water.
Could what cross the BBB? The virus? Almost certainly. A random protein that got injected into the blood? Probably. Something on a q-tip? Possibly, depends on what it is.
The vaccine was either designed to be able to cross the BBB, or was created incompetently. What I mean is, it's not "designed" to be able to cross the BBB, but its not designed to prevent it either.
When I was working on designing similar technology for something completely different (drug delivery) this was one of the concerns that needed to be accounted for. The delivery system must be outside of certain size range, and have certain molecules on the surface in order to keep it from being transcytosed (cross the BBB). That the specific format used for the vaccine did not include such safeguards was my first clue that something was rotten in Denmark (months before it was ever implemented).
Is it correct still that the only evidence of what is referred to as SARS - COV2 is the insilco genome sequence that was uploaded to the Chinese database on the 10th Jan 2020 as far as you are aware?
the only evidence of what is referred to as SARS - COV2 is the insilco genome sequence that was uploaded to the Chinese database on the 10th Jan 2020 as far as you are aware?
Well, there are numerous reports of isolation and sequencing that have come from various institutions around the world, so no, I don't think that's true at all. That was just the first such "isolation", which the CDC used for its recommendations, treatments, tests, etc.
Having said that, anything is possible, but it would require fraudulent activity on the part of all the people putting out those independent reports of sequencing, and that makes no sense to me. I have been in that world. That is just not something that would happen. It would have to be intentional, and that to me makes it "impossible."
Thanks. There has to be a reason that all of the swabbing was as far down the nose as possible. It never seemed to add up to me, because the entry to the nose would be the most likely place to pick up anything of note.
PS I broke both sides of my ankle in the Jan 2021 and spent 5 days in hospital, had one test when I was half asleep and managed to snort so hard the nurse took the swab out without it going very far. Never heard a thing back. That's as far as my interaction with any of this crap went. No masks, no tests, no injections, nothing, ohh and no covid.
Do you mean if someone actually got bit by a snake?
I don't think so. The Vitamin D/Zinc is to help protect the cell when SARS binds to the ACE-2 receptor. This is binding to a different receptor. I'd have to look into it more to be sure, but off the cuff, I really don't think so.
It is said that cigarette smokers weren't affected by SARS-CoV-2 because the cigarette nicotine binded to the nicotine receptors in the brain and prevented the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding.
Does this also mean cigarette smokers are less effected by snake venom than non-smokers?
Does the nicotine in cigarettes cause smokers to lose their sense of smell and taste?
I picked the wrong day to quit smoking
Current speculated vaccine ingredients:
Normie verson:
https://www.vumc.org/viiii/sites/default/files/public_files/Images/mRNA_Ingredients.jpg
"Science" version:
https://media.wusa9.com/assets/WUSA/images/c3e00d6f-7b18-40c7-8253-0db89f14bec3/c3e00d6f-7b18-40c7-8253-0db89f14bec3_1920x1080.jpg
I suspect they are hiding ingredients by splitting them out into separate chemicals and molecules, so they can say "it's just these things here!!" but combined, it is something completely different. They have AI powerful enough to do this, make a list of all "potential substances" that could be formed from a list of ingredients, then they could selectively use substances in place of ingredients to hide what it actually is. E.g. the building blocks are mundane, but added together, are some real deadly ingredients.
Probably why some of them needed to be frozen until injection. If the reaction starts outside of the body, it would be too obvious what they're putting in people's bodies.
ooo ooo ooo - like the Joker in the Batman movie with Michael Keaton - good stuff
Love that Joker!
Trust the science. Right
The Hydra theory was debunked, turned out it was a plant pollen that looked like a hydra.. Dr. Flemming debunked it.
I vividly remember the talk early on about how smokers didn't seem to be affected as much, because I'm a smoker I noticed this.
And the Al WIlson song "The snake" at the end of many Trump rallies, curious.
I've been buying my older coworker Menthol Newports for the past year now since his state banned them. Guy hasn't been to the doctor in 30+ years, and drinks 5-6 Molsens every night. He hasn't been sick in years.
Me, been sick twice in the past 3 months but the kids bring illnesses home from school regularly.
I'm not advocating his lifestyle, but something doesn't add up. 🤷♂️
I knew several old guys in my hometown who started smoking at 16, multiple packs a day, and died of a car accident or some other farm accident in their mid to late 90's. One guy was in his mud 80's and would sit on his porch and take a drag off his cigarette, and then put his oxygen mask back on for a second, and then switch it back and forth till he had smoked through his pack. He only got the oxygen lit on fire a few times. LoL. My belief is that some of us are built to withstand more shit than others. Genetics, upbringing, environment, etc. I've known some pretty frail older guys, and some old guys that were built like clydesdales.
Grandpa drank coke and lived til 92. Confirmed link
Grandpa got started in the army air corps in WWII. they'd have coke and Hershey chocolate for the guys when they came back from a mission. Only coke and Hershey chocolate in grandpas house after that. I drink prodigious amounts of coke to this day lol
That's awesome. Your granny was obviously born before the tidal wave of vaccines started being pushed on everyone in the 60's and 70's, she likely avoided others as their home remedies (like daily cod liver oil) worked so well in her family.
My coworker had a traumatizing experience as a kid in the dentist chair and NEVER went to any doctor again afterward. No shots, no dentist, no nurses, nuffin.
Being happy counts for a lot!
"I'd never recommend hard drugs and strong drink as a solution to anybodys problems, but they've always worked for me." - hunter thompson
"I just wanted to smoke parmesan cheese" - Hunter Biden
Same, mentally filed it in the "that's odd" category. When I mentioned the smoking bit to the family, one of them said (of the smokers), "See, I knew it would be good for something."
See, now this makes sense. SARS has homology with snake venom. This does not surprise me. No "venom in the water to poison" necessary (which is a statement that makes NO sense on the face of it).
That's probably being put out as a cover for this fact being revealed
That's my take. The info was coming out, and Stew Peters got the job to tank it by dunking the convo into municipal water supply, fortune cookies and the pope. The other interviewers have done much better.
Yes this does makes sense
Yes, disinfo to downplay this extreme fuckery and make those that talk about it look crazy.
No venom in the water to poison necessary because the vaccinated are releasing the venom into the water naturally when they flush the toilet. We are all drinking everyone else's drugs, hormone treatments, birth control pills, Viagra. Think hard about it and don't drink the water!
Well ok
Nothing needs to be injected, it needs to enter the bloodstream; there are other ways. Don't doubt what an army of chemists is capable of these days.
Are you saying we are drinking sewage? I don't think municipal water systems are built that way.
Of course you are, they aren't making water. They 'treat' it, and they enhance it, and they meet certain thresholds for cleanliness that they don't explain to you; but it starts out as sewage.
You are a living example of the bad effects of paranoia. Municipal water systems start with water from a natural source (lake, aquifer), filter it to keep the bad stuff out, add some chlorite or peroxide to sterilize it, and then it is supplied for human consumption. The sewage is treated to get the organics down to simple molecules so it can be flushed into the environment. We do not drink sewage.
Thank you for this critical information that helps us normals process all this iinformation.
This is not snake venom...
This is a protein that binds to the same receptors as a particular snake venom because of homology (the reactive site has protein similarity). It was almost certainly by design. What it is not is a "venom" it's a "virus." Not that the distinction here is all that important, but "anti-venom" has nothing to do with it specifically. Anti-venom is a specific monoclonal antibody that binds to a specific protein region. Monoclonal antibodies are very specific. In the case of SARS, you can have many different monoclonal antibodies that will work (binds to different parts of the SARS-CoV-2 virion). If the particular one for the snake venom also works on SARS that's great (though I'd be surprised if it works very well since the similar region is not large).
There are also many other treatments that can be used on a virus though, not just monoclonal antibodies. Things like HCQ, Ivermectin, etc. are likely even better than monoclonal antibodies (not to downplay its effectiveness).
what sucks is that I've seen so many people here dismiss the whole thing because it in no possible way be "snake venom"...well yeah duh! But who ever said it was snake venom? Why were people here even spreading that? Common deep state tactic (which the Devil does too) is you take the truth and you twist it just a little, and when you're just one degree off, then one mile down the road you are way off from the truth. "Eat the fish but spit out the bones" is how I approach all information.
I'm not sure if that's true. I personally dismissed "venom to poison the water", which many others did as well. And in truth, I didn't really "dismiss it," I asked for source evidence that wasn't Stew Peters and got downvoted into oblivion for not believing he was an automatic truthsayer. I never said it was impossible that SARS might have homology with snake venom, in fact I said that was quite possible.
Almost everyone.
RIght, I understand people HERE have been saying that, but that's why it's a problem because people obviously didn't watch the videos and read the articles. I meant to say that none of those who did the research and published the videos said it was literally snake venom. I suppose it's a matter of semantics, but it isn't literally snake venom. I guess it's kind of like the Covid "vaccine", like technically it is in no way a vaccine in the same sense that the traditional vaccines are but we use the same term to define it because in the general application it is one. People get so hung up on semantics haha, and I wouldn't normally care but when facts are confused with theories, semantics unfortunately DO matter. Cheers bruh! :)
I used to get upset with people for arguing semantics with me and not appreciating my "obvious intent." In truth, I still do. :)
But words literally (I mean that literally (i.e. the literal definition of literal)) create our world; at least the human part of it. The strict definition of words and the sentence structure (grammar) used to string them together puts strict boundaries on our actions, thoughts, beliefs, reality, truth (lower case reality/truth, not Reality/Truth upper case).
Semantics matter. They matter a great deal. Once you start to see how The Matrix is created, you see that nothing matters more, at least with respect to understanding it and countering the brainwashing.
But they can and do make synthetic snake venom correct?
Of course, it's just a protein. It is only effective as a toxin if it is injected into the bloodstream though. That is the definition of "venom": an injected toxin.
I mean, it's theoretically possible such a protein could have a partial effect if swallowed in large enough quantities, but the stomach will break it down, so it will probably have no effect at all, especially in small quantities like a "poisoned water supply."
Could it cross the blood brain barrier though, say by shoving a giant swab all the way down ones nose, or by injecting a "vaccine" incorrectly and getting into the blood stream? We were told it wasn't a leaky vaccine, however this has been proved absolutely incorrect.
I'm just thinking out loud here. It was one of my first questions, "I thought venom had to be direct into the blood stream" and not just via a third party, ie water.
Could what cross the BBB? The virus? Almost certainly. A random protein that got injected into the blood? Probably. Something on a q-tip? Possibly, depends on what it is.
The vaccine was either designed to be able to cross the BBB, or was created incompetently. What I mean is, it's not "designed" to be able to cross the BBB, but its not designed to prevent it either.
When I was working on designing similar technology for something completely different (drug delivery) this was one of the concerns that needed to be accounted for. The delivery system must be outside of certain size range, and have certain molecules on the surface in order to keep it from being transcytosed (cross the BBB). That the specific format used for the vaccine did not include such safeguards was my first clue that something was rotten in Denmark (months before it was ever implemented).
Excellent, thanks for the reply.
Is it correct still that the only evidence of what is referred to as SARS - COV2 is the insilco genome sequence that was uploaded to the Chinese database on the 10th Jan 2020 as far as you are aware?
TIA.
Well, there are numerous reports of isolation and sequencing that have come from various institutions around the world, so no, I don't think that's true at all. That was just the first such "isolation", which the CDC used for its recommendations, treatments, tests, etc.
Having said that, anything is possible, but it would require fraudulent activity on the part of all the people putting out those independent reports of sequencing, and that makes no sense to me. I have been in that world. That is just not something that would happen. It would have to be intentional, and that to me makes it "impossible."
reasonable question.
Thanks. There has to be a reason that all of the swabbing was as far down the nose as possible. It never seemed to add up to me, because the entry to the nose would be the most likely place to pick up anything of note.
PS I broke both sides of my ankle in the Jan 2021 and spent 5 days in hospital, had one test when I was half asleep and managed to snort so hard the nurse took the swab out without it going very far. Never heard a thing back. That's as far as my interaction with any of this crap went. No masks, no tests, no injections, nothing, ohh and no covid.
Always learn alot from your posts. Thank you for sharing.
Do you mean if someone actually got bit by a snake?
I don't think so. The Vitamin D/Zinc is to help protect the cell when SARS binds to the ACE-2 receptor. This is binding to a different receptor. I'd have to look into it more to be sure, but off the cuff, I really don't think so.
Monoclonal antibodies, glutathione, melatonin, NAC
It is said that cigarette smokers weren't affected by SARS-CoV-2 because the cigarette nicotine binded to the nicotine receptors in the brain and prevented the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding.
Does this also mean cigarette smokers are less effected by snake venom than non-smokers?
Does the nicotine in cigarettes cause smokers to lose their sense of smell and taste?
I'm hoping some one has answers for the above.
Thanks, interesting. I'm trying to make sense of the nicotine receptor bit as it relates to SARS-CoV-2.
There is a lot to it, it is why 5% of smokers died.
Start watching non smokers who have had the vax and smokers who have had the vax let's see who gets sick first.
Also why is it so expensive to buy the Nicorette to give up smoking