Haven’t listened for a couple years. I’ll bet he lost a lot of viewers because of anti Q stuff.
The “I Beleive Sandy Hook was real” didn’t pay off for him.
He could have claimed the case is a fraud because SH wasn’t real.
I tuned in a week or so ago to see what he was saying.
The “Stupid January 6 Q followers” thought that Q told them to go inside the capital building. What??
Remember Zak? Zak was Jones' own version of Q. First Jones claimed he was golfing with the actual Q and claimed to speak for Q. When that didn't fly, he pulled Zak out of his ass, claiming Zak was his own Q. That didn't gain any traction so he dropped it.
I remember when Alex Jones was always teasing Joe Rogan by asking things like, "So be honest with me Joe, have you been approached yet? You know... by men in black suits wearing sunglasses.." As he smirked playfully.
Joe was always like, "What!? No dude why the hell do you always ask me that?"
Makes me think this is a reverse Psychology technique to put it in the viewers minds, "Alex Jones could never be the type to work with secret intelligence agencies." And to put the spotlight on Joe.
He didn't lose any actual case. He didn't defend.
The whole thing was a Trump up excuse the pun.
To discourage any truth-telling on the Sandyhook Psyop.
Wolfgang Halbig is an example of what would happen as well.
Money grab-and-run covered by fake court case, chess move covering two positions, prove them wrong.
Like Jim Fetzer, they were all over this early on and have all the proof that SH was a hoax, a drill turned live with crisis actors. But they are no match for the Cabal protecting these FF and outright hoaxes. The narrative of these hoaxes must be protected at all costs.
Maybe this was always the deep state plan. AJ speaks out about Sandy Hook being an inside job. Then he is sued into oblivion, which sets the precedent that it's not ok to speak out about conspiracies....
Not to mention AJ now "owns" Sandy Hook. All oxygen on the event is completely sucked up by AJ (words that MSM made sure to broadcast, unlike 99% of what AJ says daily).
No meaningful conversation has ever been had on Sandy Hook.
I can get behind AJ being a way to discredit the entire "conspiracy theorist" community, but he still has spoken truth over the years which makes me wonder why the deep state would want people to become aware of this stuff in the first place.
Even the true ones. Of course, the lawsuit is just the DS taking $$ out of one pocket and putting it into another....
The real question for the DS is, "Why keep paying for this operation?". Only the densest of idiots follow Jones ever since he "apologized for lying" about James Alefantis. They don't need him anymore.
"Filing for Chapter 11 allows companies to continue operating while they formulate a plan to turn their businesses around. It also puts a pause on any pending civil litigation."
But it doesn't take much to see that this clown is a deep state plant
Very classic approach:
speak some low hanging truth to draw people in and gain notoriety
start mingling absolute BS with said truth
act like a maniac
Now when other people start spreading truth, all the deep state propaganda machine has to do is to point out "but look, they're the same ilk of that crazy AJ guy!", and the sheep will disregard anything out of the actual truth-teller because of it.
Even when he's talking about chinese battle androids? not gonna lie, it's going to be kinda cool if he's right about that one, if a bit terrifying.
Also him going around in an armored car while screaming about these things via a megaphone to the general populace is not a good look.
It's an act, to make "conspiracy theorists" look crazy, and therefore give the propagandists something to point at, and keep the sheep asleep, because anyone trying to tell them truth will be grouped with the crazy megaphone, armored car, chinese battle android guy.
The things he has been "right-on" are the "low hanging fruit" truths.
Yes, and he does so so far in advance that by the time it is proven true, it is no longer “relevant” because the populace has already “debunked” it in their own minds.
am I to understand that we are supposed to suddenly believe that what the nyp says is true? GAW is getting very confusing. Nevertheless, I won't be giving them any money or credibility with a click on the link.
the Post has been pretty good the past few years.. maybe you are confusing it with the times?
Regardless I don't think anyone is taking everything the post says as true. the entire point of this is to be able to discern for yourself, research and make your own decision. Don't look at posts as statements of verified fact, but as interesting topics for possible research.. or shitposts and fun/lighthearted entertainment.
Don't expect everyone to come loaded with all the facts, if you are open to a new idea or thought on a topic you'll entertain ideas and research.. and if you're not you'll get angry and rationalize why you're unwilling to.
That being said it's always appreciated when anons share their research too. So why do you think the New York Post is wrong on this story?
Haven’t listened for a couple years. I’ll bet he lost a lot of viewers because of anti Q stuff. The “I Beleive Sandy Hook was real” didn’t pay off for him.
He could have claimed the case is a fraud because SH wasn’t real.
I tuned in a week or so ago to see what he was saying.
The “Stupid January 6 Q followers” thought that Q told them to go inside the capital building. What??
His anti Q shit is the worst lies he’s ever told.
His anti-Q stuff from the beginning should have woke up the patriots but some still insist he is the bomb.
I'm glad to see him bombing. He is a gatekeeper that was put in place to make all the "conspiracy theorists" look like nutjobs.
Remember Zak? Zak was Jones' own version of Q. First Jones claimed he was golfing with the actual Q and claimed to speak for Q. When that didn't fly, he pulled Zak out of his ass, claiming Zak was his own Q. That didn't gain any traction so he dropped it.
Oh yeah! Zach! Didn’t he turn out to be someone they were interviewing for something else?
I remember when Alex Jones was always teasing Joe Rogan by asking things like, "So be honest with me Joe, have you been approached yet? You know... by men in black suits wearing sunglasses.." As he smirked playfully.
Joe was always like, "What!? No dude why the hell do you always ask me that?"
Makes me think this is a reverse Psychology technique to put it in the viewers minds, "Alex Jones could never be the type to work with secret intelligence agencies." And to put the spotlight on Joe.
Lol. wasn't he at January 6th?
He didn't lose any actual case. He didn't defend. The whole thing was a Trump up excuse the pun. To discourage any truth-telling on the Sandyhook Psyop. Wolfgang Halbig is an example of what would happen as well.
Money grab-and-run covered by fake court case, chess move covering two positions, prove them wrong.
btw: not a move by a team that is 'winning'
What happened to Wolfgang? I seen his documentary. Very powerful stuff.
Like Jim Fetzer, they were all over this early on and have all the proof that SH was a hoax, a drill turned live with crisis actors. But they are no match for the Cabal protecting these FF and outright hoaxes. The narrative of these hoaxes must be protected at all costs.
Maybe this was always the deep state plan. AJ speaks out about Sandy Hook being an inside job. Then he is sued into oblivion, which sets the precedent that it's not ok to speak out about conspiracies....
Not to mention AJ now "owns" Sandy Hook. All oxygen on the event is completely sucked up by AJ (words that MSM made sure to broadcast, unlike 99% of what AJ says daily).
No meaningful conversation has ever been had on Sandy Hook.
All designed to protect the Cabal narrative. No one died at SH or during the BB.
I can get behind AJ being a way to discredit the entire "conspiracy theorist" community, but he still has spoken truth over the years which makes me wonder why the deep state would want people to become aware of this stuff in the first place.
Even the true ones. Of course, the lawsuit is just the DS taking $$ out of one pocket and putting it into another....
The real question for the DS is, "Why keep paying for this operation?". Only the densest of idiots follow Jones ever since he "apologized for lying" about James Alefantis. They don't need him anymore.
"Filing for Chapter 11 allows companies to continue operating while they formulate a plan to turn their businesses around. It also puts a pause on any pending civil litigation."
source on mossad funding?
Idk about mossad funding.
But it doesn't take much to see that this clown is a deep state plant
Very classic approach:
Now when other people start spreading truth, all the deep state propaganda machine has to do is to point out "but look, they're the same ilk of that crazy AJ guy!", and the sheep will disregard anything out of the actual truth-teller because of it.
The problem is that he hasn’t added in any bs. He’s been right-on, most of the time, often years ahead, on obscure stuff.
Even when he's talking about chinese battle androids? not gonna lie, it's going to be kinda cool if he's right about that one, if a bit terrifying.
Also him going around in an armored car while screaming about these things via a megaphone to the general populace is not a good look.
It's an act, to make "conspiracy theorists" look crazy, and therefore give the propagandists something to point at, and keep the sheep asleep, because anyone trying to tell them truth will be grouped with the crazy megaphone, armored car, chinese battle android guy.
The things he has been "right-on" are the "low hanging fruit" truths.
like gay frogs?
That was true...
I know he’s a psy-op, because no one could have known about gay frogs so far in advance - my question specifically is regarding the mossad connection.
Yes, and he does so so far in advance that by the time it is proven true, it is no longer “relevant” because the populace has already “debunked” it in their own minds.
The source of the claim, yes.
I am looking for the source that SUBSTANTIATES that claim.
Makes sense to me that Jones would do this.
I wonder what platform he will come back with IMO.
Or they could just move the next guy up. It would be interesting to plot the viewer count of AJ on a thinking with threat of Stew Peters.
stewie does seem to be getting set up for a promotion doesn't he?
Confess I started out with Jones years ago.
I did too, back in 2010, and continued for a year or so. I don't regret it; it was a beginning. Didn't take long to outgrow him though.
Mossad money drying up, or is AJ himself drying up and the cabal see that their future is in Stew Peters.
I don't follow Jones.
am I to understand that we are supposed to suddenly believe that what the nyp says is true? GAW is getting very confusing. Nevertheless, I won't be giving them any money or credibility with a click on the link.
the Post has been pretty good the past few years.. maybe you are confusing it with the times?
Regardless I don't think anyone is taking everything the post says as true. the entire point of this is to be able to discern for yourself, research and make your own decision. Don't look at posts as statements of verified fact, but as interesting topics for possible research.. or shitposts and fun/lighthearted entertainment.
Don't expect everyone to come loaded with all the facts, if you are open to a new idea or thought on a topic you'll entertain ideas and research.. and if you're not you'll get angry and rationalize why you're unwilling to.
That being said it's always appreciated when anons share their research too. So why do you think the New York Post is wrong on this story?
Dis better? https://archive.ph/9EeJu