If JA is given immunity to testify he could prove Crowdstrike and Sussman fabricated everything in order to smear Trump.
All you have to do is ask JA, "How did you get the DNC files for wikileaks?"
"Seth Rich" would blow up Crowdstrike and Sussman's narrative. They're all getting increasingly connected to everything else. JA is the match that lights the trigger.
They're scared to death of him.
SR connects to DNC (It was an inside job, not a hack).
MS_13 (MS-13 hitman murder SR in a cover up).
JA (Knows the truth that SR got the files from the DNC, not Russia.)
JA = detonator
Durham is wiring the bomb (connecting it to everyone from the Clinton Campaign to the Podestas).
KimDotcom also claims to have ties to @Wikileaks and Seth Rich-
@KimDotcom
Seth was @Wikileaks DNC source.
Seth was killed for that reason.
Seth is one of many Clinton victims.
Seth is a hero for preventing Clinton. https://twitter.com/takerealrisks/status/864508163755835392
If Congress includes #SethRich case into their Russia probe I'll give written testimony with evidence that Seth Rich was @Wikileaks source.
So he has the goods but is holding out to force them to name him in their official docs? Sounds more like an attempted troll. Kinda sad that this is how he chooses to stay relevant.
He made the offer to congress years ago, so I wouldn't say it's how he's trying to stay relevant. He said he was completely ignored. He was also using it as a bargaining chip in his megaupload case, as I recall.
Now look into the recent covers on Wired and see how far they've fallen. This month it looks like they're trying to run defense for Zuck. That's just based on the headline tho. Not interested in verifying that assumption lol.
Other messages in the stream address Julian Assange or Internet freedoms or the tyranny of the FBI.
Even back in 2012 ha. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
I saw a live stream previously where he refused to do so. I think that either 1) Seth Rich is still alive and as such JA will not reveal that SR is the source, or 2) Seth Rich is dead, but JA still won't reveal his source due to journalistic integrity.
What I don't understand is why they used the DNC hack lie. JA was always going to be a danger to the whole thing.
Now Durham is going around building connections (the spiderweb) between all of them. He forced Mark Elias (Fusion GPS connection) to testify which means he successful broke attorney-client privilege. That's a huge barrier to break.
Lawyers for private investigation firm Fusion GPS argued in court filings released Tuesday that Trump’s newly filed racketeering suit bolsters their effort to conceal specifics of the firm’s work with the 2016 Clinton campaign via attorney-client privilege. Trump and his allies have long targeted Fusion, which commissioned the controversial Steele Dossier making salacious and at times unsupported allegations about Trump’s ties to Russia.
And look at the idiots doing the hard work of wiring themselves to Durham's bomb:
In a court filing in connection with the criminal prosecution of one of Elias’ former colleagues, Michael Sussmann, for allegedly lying to the FBI, Elias contends that Fusion played a role in his effort to guard the Clinton camp and the DNC from a litigious adversary — Trump — as they prepared to unleash a fusillade of attacks about his business record and foreign entanglements.
They are now intervening in Sussman's case to try and stop it from connecting to them. They are trying to keep themselves from connecting by... connecting themselves and arguing that Sussman's matter affects their legal matters.
On Halloween 2016, Clinton tweeted, “Donald Trump has a secret server ... It was set up to communicate privately with a Putin-tied Russian bank.”
Clinton later tweeted, “Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank.”
(We now know who those computer scientists were. Ask Joffe and his Georgia Tech scientists).
Interestingly, Comey reopens the investigation into Clinton on October 28th, 2016.
HRC was in the air at 30,000 feet when at 1:04 pm on October 28th, when Comey's letter lands. HRC still says she is traumatized by "October 28th, 2016".
One year later, Q drops the first post on October 28th, 2017.
Sussmann’s lawyers argued the Clinton tweet sharing Sullivan’s statement and touting the story, which originally appeared in Slate, should be considered “inadmissible” for two “fundamental” reasons.
Sussman's lawyers wrote, “The Tweet, which was posted on October 31, 2016, does not reveal anything about Mr. Sussmann’s state of mind over a month earlier, when he purportedly made the alleged false statement.
“There is no evidence that Mr. Sussmann’s meeting with Mr. Baker had anything to do with the Clinton Campaign’s broader media strategy.”
This is what they're fighting:
Sussmann’s lawyers countered, “There is a real danger that if the Tweet were admitted, the jury would believe that Hillary Clinton herself was part of the Special Counsel’s uncharged conspiracy and that she had a direct interest or involvement in Mr. Sussmann’s efforts. Drawing the candidate herself into this matter in this way would be unfair to Mr. Sussmann.”
No, don't draw HRC into this. If she gets drawn into, then think of all the other people she could pull in with her. They CAN'T allow that.
Guess that October 31st, 2016 tweet by Hillary is going to boomerang back. Tweeting that was really, really stupid.
Look at them scrambling to say there is no connection. Don't connect us. You can't! REEEEEE.
Why did Comey reopen the investigation anyway near the election? Wouldn't it have been in his best interest to just ignore it? Or did he have orders from someone else against Hillary?
I'm also curious about that. HRC clearly didn't expect it. Also look at the names that signed onto Comey's letter. Chuck Grassley, Devid Nunes, Robert Goodlatte, and people we associate with white hats. Q said "Trust Grassley".
Comey dropped it while HRC was in the air. It was definitely done deliberately when she was in the air. I am not sure why he did it. Maybe he had his own grudge against HRC. It's a mystery.
HRC's October 31st, 2016 tweet is going to haunt her. They're throwing everything they have to not let Durham use that as proof that Clinton KNEW. They're saying is inadmissible in court and a whole lot of REEEEE.
They knew that each agency was threatened. They knowingly lied in Congress to not us only - the world.
Think of the beauty of a DNC guy NOt BEING OK with lying and rigging the primaries.
Seth jumped that data. Q told us how he used a USB based exploit against a VLC app to get the data locally.
Their OP was against Russia - they had to tie this to Russia. Why?
Putin gave GEOTUS a soccer ball: because the game was being passed. He gave Trump the ball to score.
If all 17 agencies were compromised how would you play the game of chess? What is Russia known for? Intel. Their agencies have run loops around the West for decades. Who had it all?
Logical Thinking.
If they make Russia and Q out to be the biggest threats? Most ammo against?
Possibly... but my hope is that White Hats have been orchestrating the timing of this and keeping him protected, and that his testimony will blow things wide open.
Desperate agencies do stupid things.
Dead cat bounce.
You may have the site but we have the source.
https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1011441579565953025📁
Panic is good.
Panic is right.
July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH.
Conspiracy no more.
Time to FEED.
Q
Theory: JA is being held in place at bay until the perfect time to unleash him. That's why he's been kept in the UK, and NOT released to the US. Because, the timing has to be right.
This would probably require letting JA in on the plan, carefully, and getting him to agree. If he understood the Plan and how it plays into taking down the Whole System, would he agree? I'm betting he would. JA has more integrity in his little finger than most of us ever see.
Just a reminder that assange is still in prison. The Wikileaks emails look extra bad for John Podesta et all. Yet nothing has happened.... yet. To hell with the Pedo’s
If you believe that line that D's pushed legal aide on the Rich family, then the fact the same law firm also represented James Alefantis is going to make you think.
First day following Q? This post is pretty clearly about Seth Rich, the leaked Podesta emails, MS-13 (the gang that allegedly does the DNC's dirty work and whose members allegedly shot Seth Rich on the street, posing as random criminals), the Rich family being pressured to use a representative the DNC pushed on them, and Julian Assange, who published Podesta's leaked emails turned over to him by Seth Rich, which gave the world a look into pizzagate and the child rape and abuse that goes on in the highest political circles.
We're finally seeing some forward movement on bringing Assange to the US, where he can testify that his source wasn't the Russians, as the DNC has claimed, but the DNC's own Seth Rich. This Q post indicates things related to Assange will heat up some time around June.
Thank you for clarifying that. And I don’t understand the posts and I don’t know how to figure any of that stuff out. So thank you for sharing that with me. I do appreciate it.
I just wasn’t sure if Assange coming here was a good or a bad thing. A while back I heard was a good thing, so there’s that.
Julian Assange is vital because he knows how wikileaks got the files from the DNC.
(Answer: Seth Rich).
The entire lie for Russiagate is built on the premise that Russia hacked the DNC servers. It can easily be proven false by JA.
https://greatawakening.win/p/141ra2y86V/overview-of-russiagate-scandal/c/
If JA is given immunity to testify he could prove Crowdstrike and Sussman fabricated everything in order to smear Trump.
All you have to do is ask JA, "How did you get the DNC files for wikileaks?"
"Seth Rich" would blow up Crowdstrike and Sussman's narrative. They're all getting increasingly connected to everything else. JA is the match that lights the trigger.
They're scared to death of him.
SR connects to DNC (It was an inside job, not a hack). MS_13 (MS-13 hitman murder SR in a cover up). JA (Knows the truth that SR got the files from the DNC, not Russia.)
JA = detonator
Durham is wiring the bomb (connecting it to everyone from the Clinton Campaign to the Podestas).
They desperately want JA dead.
KimDotcom also claims to have ties to @Wikileaks and Seth Rich-
@KimDotcom
12:12 PM · May 16, 2017·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/864513902435901440
https://nitter.net/KimDotcom/status/864513902435901440
@KimDotcom
6:42 PM · May 19, 2017·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/865699156278484992
https://nitter.net/KimDotcom/status/865699156278484992
@KimDotcom
1:46 PM · May 20, 2017·Twitter for iPhone
https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/865987139166552064
https://nitter.net/KimDotcom/status/865987139166552064
So he has the goods but is holding out to force them to name him in their official docs? Sounds more like an attempted troll. Kinda sad that this is how he chooses to stay relevant.
Drop #1287
How do you INTRODUCE evidence into an investigation (legally)? - Q
He made the offer to congress years ago, so I wouldn't say it's how he's trying to stay relevant. He said he was completely ignored. He was also using it as a bargaining chip in his megaupload case, as I recall.
https://www.wired.com/2012/10/ff-kim-dotcom/
This was a great read.
Now look into the recent covers on Wired and see how far they've fallen. This month it looks like they're trying to run defense for Zuck. That's just based on the headline tho. Not interested in verifying that assumption lol.
Even back in 2012 ha. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Will JA reveal his source?
I saw a live stream previously where he refused to do so. I think that either 1) Seth Rich is still alive and as such JA will not reveal that SR is the source, or 2) Seth Rich is dead, but JA still won't reveal his source due to journalistic integrity.
What I don't understand is why they used the DNC hack lie. JA was always going to be a danger to the whole thing.
Now Durham is going around building connections (the spiderweb) between all of them. He forced Mark Elias (Fusion GPS connection) to testify which means he successful broke attorney-client privilege. That's a huge barrier to break.
They're desperate to stop it. This move is panic:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump%20suit%20against%20clinton%20could%20sustain%20secrecy%20on%20origins%20of%20dossier/ar-AAWomvC
And look at the idiots doing the hard work of wiring themselves to Durham's bomb:
They are now intervening in Sussman's case to try and stop it from connecting to them. They are trying to keep themselves from connecting by... connecting themselves and arguing that Sussman's matter affects their legal matters.
(We now know who those computer scientists were. Ask Joffe and his Georgia Tech scientists).
Interestingly, Comey reopens the investigation into Clinton on October 28th, 2016.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15HIOlCvNh/one-theory-why-q-chose-october-2/c/
HRC was in the air at 30,000 feet when at 1:04 pm on October 28th, when Comey's letter lands. HRC still says she is traumatized by "October 28th, 2016".
One year later, Q drops the first post on October 28th, 2017.
This is what they're fighting:
No, don't draw HRC into this. If she gets drawn into, then think of all the other people she could pull in with her. They CAN'T allow that.
Guess that October 31st, 2016 tweet by Hillary is going to boomerang back. Tweeting that was really, really stupid.
Look at them scrambling to say there is no connection. Don't connect us. You can't! REEEEEE.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/sussmann-doesnt-want-clinton-tweet-touting-collusion-claims-to-be-admissible
Why did Comey reopen the investigation anyway near the election? Wouldn't it have been in his best interest to just ignore it? Or did he have orders from someone else against Hillary?
I'm also curious about that. HRC clearly didn't expect it. Also look at the names that signed onto Comey's letter. Chuck Grassley, Devid Nunes, Robert Goodlatte, and people we associate with white hats. Q said "Trust Grassley".
Comey dropped it while HRC was in the air. It was definitely done deliberately when she was in the air. I am not sure why he did it. Maybe he had his own grudge against HRC. It's a mystery.
Probably forced or given a choice
...why don't they just make sussman disappear?
Because she wasn't supposed to lose🤣
HRC's October 31st, 2016 tweet is going to haunt her. They're throwing everything they have to not let Durham use that as proof that Clinton KNEW. They're saying is inadmissible in court and a whole lot of REEEEE.
u/#durham
And this exchange is why I'm here. ThanQ
Yes.
Remember.
17 agencies.
Why?
Each one signed off on the Hsck story?
Think about that.
They knew it wasn’t a hack.
They knew that each agency was threatened. They knowingly lied in Congress to not us only - the world.
Think of the beauty of a DNC guy NOt BEING OK with lying and rigging the primaries.
Seth jumped that data. Q told us how he used a USB based exploit against a VLC app to get the data locally.
Their OP was against Russia - they had to tie this to Russia. Why?
Putin gave GEOTUS a soccer ball: because the game was being passed. He gave Trump the ball to score.
If all 17 agencies were compromised how would you play the game of chess? What is Russia known for? Intel. Their agencies have run loops around the West for decades. Who had it all?
Logical Thinking.
If they make Russia and Q out to be the biggest threats? Most ammo against?
They painted the picture for all to see.
They were “boned” 😂😂😆😆
This one hit close to home for me, Seth was a fellow Nebraskan like me. We were on different sides politically, but we both love this country.
speaking of Nebraska, there's a Trump rally on the 29th in case you didn't see it yet🤠🇺🇸
So... he's arriving back in the US in June. Now THAT's a datefag for ya'.
You want fries with that?
Source files in June plsssss
We just need the passwords
I'm just going off what Q said above... "June ETA"
And I'm not seriously datefagging... I thought my statement would have been seen as sarcastic or at least cheeky.
I saw it that way, lol.
Seventeen year delta! <s>
ouch
Is he actually?
That's why it's a datefag. Q drop implies hes here in June
Yeah I get it now. Skipped over the last part.
Future proves past
After 2 years one would think you'd understand deltas,
Won't someone kill him before he can say a word?
Possibly... but my hope is that White Hats have been orchestrating the timing of this and keeping him protected, and that his testimony will blow things wide open.
Coming in hot!
KEK the link to this one is hilarious:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hbg6vISD/and-heres-what-qs-said-about-ass/
Please Q, tell me more about ass.
Yes, Q! Something I know less and less and less about, these days. OK, zero (the vaxxed repulse me). LOL, I'm a monk, now. 🐸
KeK
Kek
He knows where the berries are bodied.
Q also wrote this:
Theory: JA is being held in place at bay until the perfect time to unleash him. That's why he's been kept in the UK, and NOT released to the US. Because, the timing has to be right.
This would probably require letting JA in on the plan, carefully, and getting him to agree. If he understood the Plan and how it plays into taking down the Whole System, would he agree? I'm betting he would. JA has more integrity in his little finger than most of us ever see.
Julian Assange may be part of the planning committee or at least may have agreed to participate years ago.
That’s a pretty cool date, if I may say so myself. Right on queue 😎
Just a reminder that assange is still in prison. The Wikileaks emails look extra bad for John Podesta et all. Yet nothing has happened.... yet. To hell with the Pedo’s
Creative
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lJhHjACjJjA
The FBI Has Been Lying About Seth Rich
If you believe that line that D's pushed legal aide on the Rich family, then the fact the same law firm also represented James Alefantis is going to make you think.
It doesn’t say Julian Assange anywhere on that post. I just don’t understand people sometimes.
First day following Q? This post is pretty clearly about Seth Rich, the leaked Podesta emails, MS-13 (the gang that allegedly does the DNC's dirty work and whose members allegedly shot Seth Rich on the street, posing as random criminals), the Rich family being pressured to use a representative the DNC pushed on them, and Julian Assange, who published Podesta's leaked emails turned over to him by Seth Rich, which gave the world a look into pizzagate and the child rape and abuse that goes on in the highest political circles.
We're finally seeing some forward movement on bringing Assange to the US, where he can testify that his source wasn't the Russians, as the DNC has claimed, but the DNC's own Seth Rich. This Q post indicates things related to Assange will heat up some time around June.
Thank you for clarifying that. And I don’t understand the posts and I don’t know how to figure any of that stuff out. So thank you for sharing that with me. I do appreciate it.
I just wasn’t sure if Assange coming here was a good or a bad thing. A while back I heard was a good thing, so there’s that.
Never mind just because it says JA does it mean Julian Assange. Sometimes the mental gymnastics people take to make things fit here is exhausting.
How do we know that is about assange?