The blood shed by good Americans during the civil war (yes, it was fought for many other reasons mostly because Cabal wanted to split the country, but the people fought for the ideals -people always fight and die for the ideals) is more than enough to put that chapter behind for good.
Just remember, there was no racism in America for a very long time until a Black man became the President.
we often romanticize history, making it black or white, but history is just as grey as the present. good mixed with bad.
it wasn't that they were southern per say, it was two-fold. they were states controlled by democrats, or people who would eventually become democrats, and they relied on free labor to make their agrarian lifestyle profitable. to them it was the human-powered agrarian machine.
the Northern states, did not rely on slavery since they were not agrarian, they were the first in America to undergo the American industrial revolution. there was no need for slaves. and many in the north would identify as whigs, then as republicans.
In the North, even before 1776, we had Black preachers, preaching to white congregations, and in the south we had Free Blacks who owned Black slaves.
the first or one of the first people to own slaves in the US was black.
The entire time there was moral term oil over slavery. When Missouri was being founded people were in an uproar over the future of America and if it would be a country of slavery. this lead to the Missouri compromise
Throughout the slavestates Democrats would often enact several gun laws to try and disarm slaves (they too could own and use guns) some states restricted them to only have possession with express permission from their masters, others outright banned it.
inthe late 1850s in ohio the DNC split the party into two. the north and the south. they both wanted slavery but the north wanted to continue the current trend where slavery is decided when a new state us created, making slavery a state by state issue. the southern democrats wanted slavery to be federalized and made legal in all states. (sounds like typical democrats), this fractured the party.
the democrat-created wilmot proviso removed the missouri compromise, and getting closer to the 1860s many states began restricting gun ownership in fear of a civil war.
since the democrat party was now split with votes they had half the voting power. this is what gave the needed advantage for the republicans to win with Abraham Lincoln.
from here there is a civil war, and if we are to believe certain theories, These united states of America becomes THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hi I study american history as a hobby. I am a hobbiest historian, and making a website on American history from 1718 to 2022 why do you say such nonsense?
Freeing slaves was always on the roadmap even after the revolution, and in principle there was agreement. The implementation was going to take a long time, both from the point of view of the freed slaves, the society and the economy. However, the Cabal did exactly what they did with BLM, it was no different. There was a reason there were more than one media people who were hung after the war.
Also, the institution of slavery was very different than what we are told. Yes, there were a fraction who treated them savagely, but for the most part they were treated humanely. The best glimpse at what the real relationship was that I could gather was a passage from a story about Thomas Jefferson, where many of his slaves were treated like family and even travelled with him to Europe and what not.
The cabal? You mean Jews? That being said did they want the Christian south to secede or united?
I think they want the states united because it would be easier to pull their usual grift and boy did they with Lincoln and finished with Grant and our country was sold to the Satanists.
Mostly they wanted that war because these devils always pull their swindle when we're at war. It left us bankrupt.
Benjamin Franklin was right. We should have never let them in to our country because every country they're in they suck it dry like vampires.
The cabal has always been rooted in the families from the City of London that runs all the central banks and controls the world. If we find ourselves hating any group of people, no matter how misguided they are, they have succeeded in keeping us divided and hating the wrong people.
Jews aren't a race but it's the Satanic system they're in. Now what you just wrote that the Brits are the evil cabal is a new one for me. Personally I never liked the Royals and they seem to play a part in stealing our money as well as the Vatican but the vast majority here will acknowledge who the base culprits are.
Have a good one.
Way ahead of you. Thats why I did not use the word "race", but rather "groups of people" because division knows no bounds. They dont care if you hate a particular race, or a particular ideology. They just want you to hate your fellow human beings.
Now what you just wrote that the Brits
Nope, I did not write this. I wrote "City of London". CoL is not part of Britain even though it's geographically in it. Its a separate soveregn entity, just like Vatican.
The best I have been able to understand the real power structure goes like this.
The most powerful tool of oppression is and always will be Usury. In the current iteration it takes the form of Central Banks - and Usury is targeted at countries rather than individual people. Usury is one of the dark arts, specifically "Magic of Money" where you create money out of thin air and use it to control people. (I mean this literally).
The people who run the Central Banks (directly or indirectly) are the 13 families (and below them their "representatives" - committee of 300). These families themselves are Satanic and they supposedly learnt the "Magic of Money" by generations of their ancestors who sacrificed children to their dark gods.
These ancestors were Khazarians, who pretended to convert into Judaism but continued to practice their dark arts. They have always used Jews as either useful idiots or as human shields (metaphorically). For instance whenever they enter a country they destroy it with their money magic. The people then turn against the Jews and kick them all out.
Different families control different parts of the world, directly or indirectly. I believe Rothschilds control the British Monarchy. The "Crown" is just another tool for these families. Same with Vatican. Same with Israel and same with Saudi Arabia (not any more). Same with USSR - it was just another tool for these people until Stalin kicked their controls out and then they worked hard to dismantle it, just as hard as they created it.
Astors were the original controllers of America. Somewhere along the way Rockefellers came in (I am assuming after John Jacob Astor was killed on Titanic to pave way for the Fed).
Even within these families there seems to be a hierarchy. For instance Rockefellers represent the interests of Rothschilds, and Soros is clearly not at the same level as the rest of them, being a new comer.
This power structure is still very hazy, and incomplete, because I believe, on top of these families from CoL, there are extra-terrestrial beings who control them. They are probably the objects of Satanic worship, but thats purely speculation on my part.
I think we agree other than there is no Jewish race. That's the big deception that leaves everyone that approaches that serpent, dizzy and confused after they've been called AntiSemite.
When you remove the race out of the word Jew and substitute it for Judaism then you've nailed the bastards. Same with Islam. There are many different races that practice it.
Satan is worshipped in many different ways.
I think at the top of the pyramid you have Satanic symbols that reflect Baal.
You mentioned City of London, the Vatican and then you have Israel and the grifters. All those roads lead to Satan.
We simply cannot allow these ideologies to continue in America and the free world after the dust settles. They will pick up where they left off.
We simply cannot allow these ideologies to continue in America and the free world after the dust settles. They will pick up where they left off.
Absolutely. And not just limited to Satanism, but all kinds of anti-human ideologies dressed up as "environmental", "population control", and various flavours of Eugenics. All of them have to go, but get exposed in their totality before going.
I would also throw in the fact that whatever is being taught in Talmud must be public and people will decide whether it needs to go as well. Same with all secret society teachings.
Niether. It was a war against Cabal's wishes to divide the country. Even if there was merit for any kind of secession, it should never happen on the terms of the Cabal.
"there was no racism in America for a very long time until a Black man became the President"
ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE.
Lincoln was a True Racist of the highest order - as were most residents of the supposed Union States. Lincoln wanted the new states to be for "Free Whites" with no black people in them, and was a major proponent of forced reverse immigration of blacks to Africa, the Caribbean and South America.
And most Americans are descended from ancestors that came here to escape their oppressive country and be treated just as poorly as a slave here. I’m talking mostly about Irish, Italian and Chinese, but even the pilgrims had it pretty rough when they got here.
ask them what, specifically, were the rules for possessing slave among native tribes? african tribes? under judaic law? muslim law? elsewhere in the world?
why were whites the only ones to end the slave trade?
are there currently slave auctions in libya and elsewhere?
why aren't they concerned about the current day slave trade?
And the slaveholders are still the same, didn't even bother changing names in 180 years. Still the same old KKK-loving, "separate-but-equal", Democrat Party.
Yup, they started planning how to retain power after the war, consolidated power massively with the Federal Reserve, put the wealth in their own pockets via that trickle-down bullshit they made Regan implement.
It gets complicated when you go back and look at history and the origins of the KKK because early on the defeated South were left alone without any policing and therefore the KKK was originated as a police force if you will. Later on the evil KKK most people think of today, were created.
Around the same historical time frame, most everyone in the white population was a serf, which is just the European name for slave. They were owned by their Land Lord Masters. The word slave comes from "Slav," referring to the Slavic race.
The famous "Cossack Warriors," were escaped serfs/slaves who refused to take it anymore.
My Great Grand Father came to America from Ireland because the English were in the process of deliberately starving over 3 million of them to death. He had to stow away on a ship, and when he was discovered, they put him in one of the life boats and drug him across the Atlantic tied by rope to the ship. They provided him with a piece of bread and bottle of water daily. But he lived through it and was able to send relief to help some of his family members avoid starvation.
Hell, most everybody who came to America was running for their lives in one way or another. Where do reparations start, and where do they end?
EDIT: We were a nation of victims, who refused to be victims. But now our social engineers are trying their hardest to turn the truth upside down. And sadly getting away with it.
White Christian Americans have done more than any other group to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ. They’ve been the most charitable group per capita in world history, helping to lift millions or billions of people out of poverty and bondage. The devil knows this, too, so he wants to take down White Christian Americans and destroy their country. The devil has inspired the spirit of antiWhiteness. Any people engaged in antiWhite activism are doing the devil’s work. ADL, SPLC, BLM, Affirmative Action, government forced wealth transfers, and corporate racial quotas are satanic.
The US education system would be one of the top in the World still if it weren't for a certain group bringing the scores down. You can argue about why that's the case but it's still a reality
History continues to tell the story. The civil war was about slavery, but not 100% as most think. Leading up to 1861, the Southern states provided over 80% of the funding of the federal government. This was through tariffs on goods provided via the South. The federal government lined their pockets and provided funding for creation of the steel industry, expansion of the railroad and industrialization. Virtually none of the federal budget tariff/taxation came back to help the South. The Southern states were held in slavery to its master, the Federal Government, and received nothing in return. When the South decided they were through being slave states, they seceded. After the firing upon Fort Sumter, Lincoln’s first response was, “where am I going to get my tariff money from”. It took over two years for Lincoln to issue the Emancipation Proclamation, so freeing African slaves was not the first thing on his mind. The war started as a way for the Southern slave states to gain freedom from the tyranny of an abusive Federal government.
Now we find ourselves in 2022 and where are we. We are a collective 50 states, all held in bondage as slaves to an abusive federal government. 30 trillion dollars in debt that generations will never be able to pay-off. Look at the control of the federal government. Our founding fathers never intended for all 50 states to be held in slavery to a federal government.
Great comment! I'm a descendant of Daniel D. Tompkins and am a history buff, even though I can't write eloquently. It's great to know the good, the bad and the ugly.
Although the roots go further back, I feel that the current monster we face is strongly rooted in pre-and post-civil war industrial growth. It seems there's a point where most people turn to the dark side over money.
Daniel D. Tompkins, former Vice President, serving with James Monroe. That is quite a pedigreed background. I cannot claim a prestigious background, though my ancestors migrated in the 1700’s to the US (Germany to Charleston, S.C.). I too am a history buff.
I agree that many aspects of our Country’s current path are traceable to how our Federal government chose to allow, or in some cases hinder growth. Tariff and tax policies for over 50 years prior to the Civil War could have been addressed and possibly subverted the worst conflict in our nation’s history. The desire for governmental funding, situations leading to personal wealth (Rockeffer, Vanderbilt, etc.) as well as overall power and control over the people of our nation led us to war.
Not much has changed, the desire for control, power, wealth and greed has led us to war after war and has resulted in the loss of personal freedoms. Sorry for the meandering. I’ll have to look up Daniel Tompkins, as I must admit I am limited as to my knowledge of your ancestor.
Many people are surprised when I bring up the fact that more Germans migrated to the USA than English. Heh, heh. I brought up Daniel D. Tompkins because of his writing to the NY Legislature in support of Abolition just before going to DC, he was governor prior to being VP.
Of the 4.5 million blacks in the 1860 Census in the United States, 4 million lived in the south. Of those, there were 261,988 were free Negroes living in the south. The fact is large numbers of free Negroes owned black slaves; in fact, in numbers disproportionate to their representation in society at large. In New Orleans in 1860 for example, over 30% of free Negroes owned black slaves. In 1860 only a small minority of whites owned slaves. According to the U.S. census report for that last year before the Civil War, there were nearly 27 million whites in the country. Some eight million of them lived in the slave-holding states.
The census also determined that there were fewer than 385,000 individuals who owned slaves (1). Even if all slaveholders had been white, that would amount to only 1.4 percent of whites in the country (or 4.8 percent of southern whites owning one or more slaves).
In "Slavery in History", Adam Gurowski wrote -- "The Jews were the common mediators and factors in this traffic, as well as the most expensive slave-traders all over Europe, both then and in subsequent times; and a considerable part of the hereditary hatred of the European masses toward the Jews is to be ascribed to this historic fact."
My friends wife works in the clothing industry and investigates conditions in factory's . She has uncovered Victorian conditions and slavery today in factory's in the Midlands in the UK. I am sure no one here is surprised that when she reported it the authority's are not interested.
Lets all guess the nationality and race of the owners of the factory's
Hint the greatest President in history would call it a Shit hole country
the Barbary Pirates sailed all the way to Ireland and Iceland to capture white slaves through the 1800s. it only stopped when France colonized North Africa.
The blood shed by good Americans during the civil war (yes, it was fought for many other reasons mostly because Cabal wanted to split the country, but the people fought for the ideals -people always fight and die for the ideals) is more than enough to put that chapter behind for good.
Just remember, there was no racism in America for a very long time until a Black man became the President.
Indeed, many founding fathers would have supported freeing the slaves, but the southern colonies wouldn't have joined the Revolution.
we often romanticize history, making it black or white, but history is just as grey as the present. good mixed with bad.
it wasn't that they were southern per say, it was two-fold. they were states controlled by democrats, or people who would eventually become democrats, and they relied on free labor to make their agrarian lifestyle profitable. to them it was the human-powered agrarian machine.
the Northern states, did not rely on slavery since they were not agrarian, they were the first in America to undergo the American industrial revolution. there was no need for slaves. and many in the north would identify as whigs, then as republicans.
In the North, even before 1776, we had Black preachers, preaching to white congregations, and in the south we had Free Blacks who owned Black slaves. the first or one of the first people to own slaves in the US was black.
The entire time there was moral term oil over slavery. When Missouri was being founded people were in an uproar over the future of America and if it would be a country of slavery. this lead to the Missouri compromise
Throughout the slavestates Democrats would often enact several gun laws to try and disarm slaves (they too could own and use guns) some states restricted them to only have possession with express permission from their masters, others outright banned it.
inthe late 1850s in ohio the DNC split the party into two. the north and the south. they both wanted slavery but the north wanted to continue the current trend where slavery is decided when a new state us created, making slavery a state by state issue. the southern democrats wanted slavery to be federalized and made legal in all states. (sounds like typical democrats), this fractured the party.
the democrat-created wilmot proviso removed the missouri compromise, and getting closer to the 1860s many states began restricting gun ownership in fear of a civil war.
since the democrat party was now split with votes they had half the voting power. this is what gave the needed advantage for the republicans to win with Abraham Lincoln.
from here there is a civil war, and if we are to believe certain theories, These united states of America becomes THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Too bad you don't know much about the history of slavery in America. But good try.
Hi I study american history as a hobby. I am a hobbiest historian, and making a website on American history from 1718 to 2022 why do you say such nonsense?
Freeing slaves was always on the roadmap even after the revolution, and in principle there was agreement. The implementation was going to take a long time, both from the point of view of the freed slaves, the society and the economy. However, the Cabal did exactly what they did with BLM, it was no different. There was a reason there were more than one media people who were hung after the war.
Also, the institution of slavery was very different than what we are told. Yes, there were a fraction who treated them savagely, but for the most part they were treated humanely. The best glimpse at what the real relationship was that I could gather was a passage from a story about Thomas Jefferson, where many of his slaves were treated like family and even travelled with him to Europe and what not.
The cabal? You mean Jews? That being said did they want the Christian south to secede or united? I think they want the states united because it would be easier to pull their usual grift and boy did they with Lincoln and finished with Grant and our country was sold to the Satanists.
Mostly they wanted that war because these devils always pull their swindle when we're at war. It left us bankrupt.
Benjamin Franklin was right. We should have never let them in to our country because every country they're in they suck it dry like vampires.
The cabal has always been rooted in the families from the City of London that runs all the central banks and controls the world. If we find ourselves hating any group of people, no matter how misguided they are, they have succeeded in keeping us divided and hating the wrong people.
Jews aren't a race but it's the Satanic system they're in. Now what you just wrote that the Brits are the evil cabal is a new one for me. Personally I never liked the Royals and they seem to play a part in stealing our money as well as the Vatican but the vast majority here will acknowledge who the base culprits are. Have a good one.
Way ahead of you. Thats why I did not use the word "race", but rather "groups of people" because division knows no bounds. They dont care if you hate a particular race, or a particular ideology. They just want you to hate your fellow human beings.
Nope, I did not write this. I wrote "City of London". CoL is not part of Britain even though it's geographically in it. Its a separate soveregn entity, just like Vatican.
The best I have been able to understand the real power structure goes like this.
The most powerful tool of oppression is and always will be Usury. In the current iteration it takes the form of Central Banks - and Usury is targeted at countries rather than individual people. Usury is one of the dark arts, specifically "Magic of Money" where you create money out of thin air and use it to control people. (I mean this literally).
The people who run the Central Banks (directly or indirectly) are the 13 families (and below them their "representatives" - committee of 300). These families themselves are Satanic and they supposedly learnt the "Magic of Money" by generations of their ancestors who sacrificed children to their dark gods.
These ancestors were Khazarians, who pretended to convert into Judaism but continued to practice their dark arts. They have always used Jews as either useful idiots or as human shields (metaphorically). For instance whenever they enter a country they destroy it with their money magic. The people then turn against the Jews and kick them all out.
Different families control different parts of the world, directly or indirectly. I believe Rothschilds control the British Monarchy. The "Crown" is just another tool for these families. Same with Vatican. Same with Israel and same with Saudi Arabia (not any more). Same with USSR - it was just another tool for these people until Stalin kicked their controls out and then they worked hard to dismantle it, just as hard as they created it.
Astors were the original controllers of America. Somewhere along the way Rockefellers came in (I am assuming after John Jacob Astor was killed on Titanic to pave way for the Fed).
Even within these families there seems to be a hierarchy. For instance Rockefellers represent the interests of Rothschilds, and Soros is clearly not at the same level as the rest of them, being a new comer.
This power structure is still very hazy, and incomplete, because I believe, on top of these families from CoL, there are extra-terrestrial beings who control them. They are probably the objects of Satanic worship, but thats purely speculation on my part.
I think we agree other than there is no Jewish race. That's the big deception that leaves everyone that approaches that serpent, dizzy and confused after they've been called AntiSemite.
When you remove the race out of the word Jew and substitute it for Judaism then you've nailed the bastards. Same with Islam. There are many different races that practice it. Satan is worshipped in many different ways.
I think at the top of the pyramid you have Satanic symbols that reflect Baal.
You mentioned City of London, the Vatican and then you have Israel and the grifters. All those roads lead to Satan.
We simply cannot allow these ideologies to continue in America and the free world after the dust settles. They will pick up where they left off.
Absolutely. And not just limited to Satanism, but all kinds of anti-human ideologies dressed up as "environmental", "population control", and various flavours of Eugenics. All of them have to go, but get exposed in their totality before going.
I would also throw in the fact that whatever is being taught in Talmud must be public and people will decide whether it needs to go as well. Same with all secret society teachings.
Yes right on target. I like your thinking. 👍
The War of Northern Aggression - or Lincoln's War of Southern Oppression.
Niether. It was a war against Cabal's wishes to divide the country. Even if there was merit for any kind of secession, it should never happen on the terms of the Cabal.
"there was no racism in America for a very long time until a Black man became the President"
ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE.
Lincoln was a True Racist of the highest order - as were most residents of the supposed Union States. Lincoln wanted the new states to be for "Free Whites" with no black people in them, and was a major proponent of forced reverse immigration of blacks to Africa, the Caribbean and South America.
You clearly do not know history. I will strictly state facts that is found within the library of congress (where i research)
All Jewish (judaizers) owned correct?
And most Americans are descended from ancestors that came here to escape their oppressive country and be treated just as poorly as a slave here. I’m talking mostly about Irish, Italian and Chinese, but even the pilgrims had it pretty rough when they got here.
The early pilgrims actually ran into native Indians and many of them were very hostile.
ask them what, specifically, were the rules for possessing slave among native tribes? african tribes? under judaic law? muslim law? elsewhere in the world?
why were whites the only ones to end the slave trade?
are there currently slave auctions in libya and elsewhere?
why aren't they concerned about the current day slave trade?
When you get the likes of people of this ilk they're definitely in a evil system like Judaism, Islam or some other satanic cult.
“why were whites the only ones to end the slave trade?”
Because Christianity was most readily adopted by White people.
And the slaveholders are still the same, didn't even bother changing names in 180 years. Still the same old KKK-loving, "separate-but-equal", Democrat Party.
Yup, they started planning how to retain power after the war, consolidated power massively with the Federal Reserve, put the wealth in their own pockets via that trickle-down bullshit they made Regan implement.
It gets complicated when you go back and look at history and the origins of the KKK because early on the defeated South were left alone without any policing and therefore the KKK was originated as a police force if you will. Later on the evil KKK most people think of today, were created.
Around the same historical time frame, most everyone in the white population was a serf, which is just the European name for slave. They were owned by their Land Lord Masters. The word slave comes from "Slav," referring to the Slavic race.
The famous "Cossack Warriors," were escaped serfs/slaves who refused to take it anymore.
My Great Grand Father came to America from Ireland because the English were in the process of deliberately starving over 3 million of them to death. He had to stow away on a ship, and when he was discovered, they put him in one of the life boats and drug him across the Atlantic tied by rope to the ship. They provided him with a piece of bread and bottle of water daily. But he lived through it and was able to send relief to help some of his family members avoid starvation.
Hell, most everybody who came to America was running for their lives in one way or another. Where do reparations start, and where do they end?
EDIT: We were a nation of victims, who refused to be victims. But now our social engineers are trying their hardest to turn the truth upside down. And sadly getting away with it.
White Christian Americans have done more than any other group to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ. They’ve been the most charitable group per capita in world history, helping to lift millions or billions of people out of poverty and bondage. The devil knows this, too, so he wants to take down White Christian Americans and destroy their country. The devil has inspired the spirit of antiWhiteness. Any people engaged in antiWhite activism are doing the devil’s work. ADL, SPLC, BLM, Affirmative Action, government forced wealth transfers, and corporate racial quotas are satanic.
The false gospel, sure.
Does it matter now? We have found out, that we are all slaves.
Oh, let’s not cloud the DS plantation propaganda with facts...
The US education system would be one of the top in the World still if it weren't for a certain group bringing the scores down. You can argue about why that's the case but it's still a reality
History continues to tell the story. The civil war was about slavery, but not 100% as most think. Leading up to 1861, the Southern states provided over 80% of the funding of the federal government. This was through tariffs on goods provided via the South. The federal government lined their pockets and provided funding for creation of the steel industry, expansion of the railroad and industrialization. Virtually none of the federal budget tariff/taxation came back to help the South. The Southern states were held in slavery to its master, the Federal Government, and received nothing in return. When the South decided they were through being slave states, they seceded. After the firing upon Fort Sumter, Lincoln’s first response was, “where am I going to get my tariff money from”. It took over two years for Lincoln to issue the Emancipation Proclamation, so freeing African slaves was not the first thing on his mind. The war started as a way for the Southern slave states to gain freedom from the tyranny of an abusive Federal government.
Now we find ourselves in 2022 and where are we. We are a collective 50 states, all held in bondage as slaves to an abusive federal government. 30 trillion dollars in debt that generations will never be able to pay-off. Look at the control of the federal government. Our founding fathers never intended for all 50 states to be held in slavery to a federal government.
Great comment! I'm a descendant of Daniel D. Tompkins and am a history buff, even though I can't write eloquently. It's great to know the good, the bad and the ugly.
Although the roots go further back, I feel that the current monster we face is strongly rooted in pre-and post-civil war industrial growth. It seems there's a point where most people turn to the dark side over money.
Daniel D. Tompkins, former Vice President, serving with James Monroe. That is quite a pedigreed background. I cannot claim a prestigious background, though my ancestors migrated in the 1700’s to the US (Germany to Charleston, S.C.). I too am a history buff.
I agree that many aspects of our Country’s current path are traceable to how our Federal government chose to allow, or in some cases hinder growth. Tariff and tax policies for over 50 years prior to the Civil War could have been addressed and possibly subverted the worst conflict in our nation’s history. The desire for governmental funding, situations leading to personal wealth (Rockeffer, Vanderbilt, etc.) as well as overall power and control over the people of our nation led us to war.
Not much has changed, the desire for control, power, wealth and greed has led us to war after war and has resulted in the loss of personal freedoms. Sorry for the meandering. I’ll have to look up Daniel Tompkins, as I must admit I am limited as to my knowledge of your ancestor.
Many people are surprised when I bring up the fact that more Germans migrated to the USA than English. Heh, heh. I brought up Daniel D. Tompkins because of his writing to the NY Legislature in support of Abolition just before going to DC, he was governor prior to being VP.
“A free man looks at life as a series of problems to be solved, and then solves them. A slave says, ‘What can I do who am but a slave?’”
Of the 4.5 million blacks in the 1860 Census in the United States, 4 million lived in the south. Of those, there were 261,988 were free Negroes living in the south. The fact is large numbers of free Negroes owned black slaves; in fact, in numbers disproportionate to their representation in society at large. In New Orleans in 1860 for example, over 30% of free Negroes owned black slaves. In 1860 only a small minority of whites owned slaves. According to the U.S. census report for that last year before the Civil War, there were nearly 27 million whites in the country. Some eight million of them lived in the slave-holding states.
The census also determined that there were fewer than 385,000 individuals who owned slaves (1). Even if all slaveholders had been white, that would amount to only 1.4 percent of whites in the country (or 4.8 percent of southern whites owning one or more slaves).
In "Slavery in History", Adam Gurowski wrote -- "The Jews were the common mediators and factors in this traffic, as well as the most expensive slave-traders all over Europe, both then and in subsequent times; and a considerable part of the hereditary hatred of the European masses toward the Jews is to be ascribed to this historic fact."
false dichotomy. It's possible to be
not a fan of reparations
not a fan of past centuries victim mentality as an excuse for current lack of progress
not a fan of using statistics, historical "context" or counter-anecdotes to downplay the utter travesty of American race based slavery
My friends wife works in the clothing industry and investigates conditions in factory's . She has uncovered Victorian conditions and slavery today in factory's in the Midlands in the UK. I am sure no one here is surprised that when she reported it the authority's are not interested. Lets all guess the nationality and race of the owners of the factory's Hint the greatest President in history would call it a Shit hole country
I am Spartacus.
the Barbary Pirates sailed all the way to Ireland and Iceland to capture white slaves through the 1800s. it only stopped when France colonized North Africa.
About four percent of American families (black or white) ever owned any slaves (black or white).
Today the number is zero.
Allow that data to penetrate.
This is the freest nation on earth, PARTICULARLY for descendants of Africans.
Yes!
Watch it mentioning (((them))), goyim!
Ever wonder why Jamaicans have a Irish accent? It's bc Irish slaves that couldn't be sold were abandoned there .just like the African ones.