352
Comments (74)
sorted by:
47
bubble_bursts 47 points ago +47 / -0

Holy shit dude, what have you unleashed? Will take a while to digest this all, but somehow I get the feeling this is mother of all decodes.

Couple of things might be connected to this:

https://greatawakening.win/p/15HuoFTRZ7/timeline-analysis-roe-vs-wade--w/

https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2022/03/12/hidden-global-warfare-japan-china/

I believe China vs Japan reflects the Bush vs Clinton constant Cabal fighting, and I believe one of these factions are the "forever-war" faction, while the other is "depopulation" faction.

The day Roe-vs-Wade was passed was the same day Vietnam war ended and Lyndon Johnson died.

Japan -> China is the transition from "Forever Wars" to "Depopulation" agenda.

Also, the only reason we know about Hillary's involvement in Watergate is because of this Trump Roast. Now it makes sense that Trump was bringing attention to this - it is indeed a crucial piece of evidence against her past.

Another good resource: Timeline of depopulaton agenda

27
SemperSupra [S] 27 points ago +27 / -0

I couldn't even fit everything into this post. Taiwan's Evergreen Marine Corporation parallels the dates of the Nixon presidency.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evergreen_Marine_Corporation

The company was founded 1 September 1968 by Yung-Fa Chang. Services began with a single cargo vessel named Central Trust, which operated a "go-anywhere" service.[7] A second vessel was added in 1969, and used on Middle East services.[7] Additional vessels were acquired through the 1970s, and routes to East Asia and Central America were added.[7] Service to the U.S. began in 1974, with the establishment of Evergreen Marine Corporation (New York) Ltd.[7]

Evergreen Marine corporation was officially formed on 9/25/1968.

Nixon is elected on 11/5/1968.

Nixon is re-elected on 11/8/1972

Nixon leaves for his historic trip to China on 2/17/1972.

The "White House Plumbers" are arrested at 2:30 am on 6/17/1972 at the Watergate Building Complex.

Nixon resigns 8/9/1974.

Evergreen group forms in 1975.


side note, did you know that 2/17/2022 was the 50th anniversary of Nixon going to China. The MSM puts down 2/21/2022, but it actually began on 2/17/2022 when Nixon officially started the trip.

Rush Limbaugh died on 2/17/2022. The same day as the 50th anniversary of Nixon's trip.

29
CQVFEFE 29 points ago +29 / -0

Rush Limbaugh died on 2/17/2022. The same day as the 50th anniversary of Nixon's trip.

And the same as the third anniversary of 2/17/19, when Q and Trump did THREE zero-deltas in one day!

For newbs, a zero delta is when Q would make a post, and then less than 60 seconds later, Trump would also post to social media. For this to have happened once or twice during a four-year period would be a weird coincidence.

For it to have happened over 30 times, three in one day, was designed to put it so far beyond the realm of coincidence that even retards couldn't write it off as unintentional.

13
bubble_bursts 13 points ago +13 / -0

Nice catch, I wonder what else is significant about that date

9
AmberWins 9 points ago +9 / -0

I dunno but I'm seriously regretting my 3rd grade vote for Nixon.

7
bubble_bursts 7 points ago +7 / -0

I always wanted to believe Nixon was a good guy that the Cabal took down, esp with all the story of how he taught Trump as a mentor and his wife wrote that letter to him that he hung in the White House.

5
Glooptygloop 5 points ago +5 / -0

He was a bohemian Grove attendee but allegedly didn't like it, calling it "the faggiest bunch He ever saw" iirc

5
bubble_bursts 5 points ago +5 / -0

Okay, that in my books is a "good guy"

2
WentFishing 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thiink he said it was the faggiest gd thing ever. (Paraphrasing)

Bur that is what you did as a potential pruesidential candidate .

Also, not all "camps "were/are the same. He was in the most elite "camp" with Kissinger,can't recall the name right now.

The whole affair is about a dereliction ot duty", crossdressing and rampant homosex. Some "camps" were making child torture and snuff films.

He had.no idea how evil i5 actually was , he saw then fag fest, not the truly satanic stuff.

2
scoripowarrior 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nixon was my first vote for Pres. when I turned 21. (yes, it was 21yrs way back then!) LOL I had to vote absentee from college back then too.

8
spanglevision 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well to be fair, I know plenty of retards who have written it off as coincidental. Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a drug.

8
CQVFEFE 8 points ago +8 / -0

It defies belief

As I said before

It is literally the equivalent of being run over by a truck and then insisting the tire tracks across your back are there by pure coincidence

4
MAGA_mandalorian 4 points ago +4 / -0

That makes 2 of us then fren. Some people would just rather stay plugged into the matrix.... Sigh

1
scoripowarrior 1 point ago +1 / -0

At this point, I'm willing to stay open minded about what is revealed. It will be difficult bc many beliefs have been set in "stone" for so long. LOL

7
LucilleBrawl 7 points ago +7 / -0

He died in 2021, right?

9
bubble_bursts 9 points ago +9 / -0

So what are your thoughts on why Nixon was taken down by the Cabal?

Hillary was kicked out of the Watergate commission - how does this fit? From what I can see, Hillary was in the depopulation agenda faction - so if Nixon was all in with that agenda, wouldnt she want to keep him in position?

Is it possible that someone under Nixon was pushing all these depop/eco agendas? And Nixon was trying to hinder it and hence got nixed?

13
SemperSupra [S] 13 points ago +14 / -1

Nixon was not "taken" down by the cabal. They simply disposed him when they got what they wanted. Who knows if he realized they'd do that to him or not. He knowingly pushed their agenda.

He was a part of them. The Clintons and Nixon and Kissinger were all on the side of Depopulation. Nixon was one of them, but he slipped in as a "republican" and did enormous damage to the US under the guise of being a "republican". Everything he did was about ruining the republicans.

He only won the first time because it was a 3 way race. He won by 43%. The exact same margin that Bill Clinton later won his election by in a 3 way race.

Nixon had no coattails. They thought impeachment would do a lot more damage in the next election that it did. Jimmy Carter barely won. They were shocked. They had expected a landslide with Nixon's resignation.

Nixon was a Trojan Horse candidate.

They didn't want Nixon getting credit for his environmental agenda. Notice every MSM article talks about how he "didn't really care". He only did it for politics. The goal was to usher in the rise of the democratic party and their real agenda. He was supposed to push the country left.

They wanted these items forced through by a "republican" so that they could portray themselves as moderate on the issue. They thought if it got through and Americans saw how "wonderful" it was then they could force people to like their agenda.

9
bubble_bursts 9 points ago +9 / -0

The whole spying on DNC just to dispose him sounds very convoluted, and there is bound to be more here. Is it possible Republicans decided to take him down?

I always envision CIA on the Bush side, and Rockefeller+Depop guys on the Clinton side. So maybe the CIA cabal faction took him down when they realised he was not their guy ?

13
SemperSupra [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

They wanted to paint themselves as victims of the evil republicans who were "nazis" who resorted to illegal spying to stop the poor widdle hippy democrats who just cared about the environment and minority rights.

It's projection. They also want to portray conservatives as evil tyrants obsessed with them while they portray themselves as the eternal victim of republican cruelty.

You see the same idea with Me Too.

The evil patriarchy is obsessed with tatted, blue-haired feminists. They all scream "hands off my ovaries!" and believe themselves in a handsmaid tale where men are desperately trying to force them to breed. It's insane, but it's how these people think.

"I'm a victim and you're obsessed with me".

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
WentFishing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nixon vs. Woodward, he clearly exposed the dork as the lying Mockingbird he is, always was. They had to create so much propaganda , multimillion dollar films , to solidify the false narrative that normies believe today. He made Woodward piss myself with facts . Watch the interviews , hilarious!

4
Pbman2 4 points ago +4 / -0

He crossed the cia and threatened them with exposing the Kenedy murder.

2
bubble_bursts 2 points ago +2 / -0

One president already dead for crossing CIA. So you go and threaten to expose them instead of just exposing it.

u/#bigbrains

1
Pbman2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Definitely in the top hundred of stupidest moves.

3
zen10101 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not sure if this is 💯 % accurate but I read (sorry, no sauce) that while Nixon was predominantly working with the Cabal, he apparently didn’t support their child sex trafficking activities and the Cabal believed they were in danger of being exposed and decided to get rid of him.

3
bubble_bursts 3 points ago +3 / -0

This and the other user's comment about Bohemian grove makes me feel are the correct explanation. It connects most of the dots in this post. Thanks for this, I will try to dig up some sauce for it.

4
Monomial 4 points ago +4 / -0

My own theory on this is the cabal wanted a way to get Nelson Rockefeller into the Whitehouse. He tried on 3 previous attempts to get the Republican nomination, but he just couldn't get the support. I think they felt by getting him installed as VP, they would make him an obvious candidate for the future.

What they didn't count on was that annoying actor, Ronald Reagan, being so damned popular and doing his whole "morning in America" thing. Pulling solar panels off the Whitehouse, and basically giving Americans what they really wanted. This really destroyed their green, depopulation agenda, and ended any chance of ever having Rockefeller sit in the Oval Office. There was no way to advance Rockefeller over Reagan in 1980, so they just abandoned the plan. Reagan the won the 1980 election by one of the largest margins in history.

6
bubble_bursts 6 points ago +6 / -0

Funnily, Nixon went out of his way to ensure Rockefeller would not become president when he resigned. This kind of stuff makes me think that the Cabal is not as cohesive as we think but rather a whole bunch of stuff always fighting with each other.

No wonder they got so mad at Trump. They have been trying for generations to get a Rockefeller into WH, and Trump just waltzes in.

u/#trumpdrums

3
b472113 3 points ago +3 / -0

Teddy Roosevelt busted up Rockefeller's Standard Oil. No Rockefeller will think kindly of Republicans no matter what they pretend their political allegiance to be.

2
WentFishing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Listen to the Nixon tapes, he has based af.

1
inspoken 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes & that person under Nixon responsible for all this is: Henry Kissinger. BTW it was Kissinger that appointed Klaus Schwab to lead the WEF along with much more including the crap on here. Nixon is was not cabal but he might have been roped into it via Kissinger. Later on, Nixon advised Trump how best to deal with the cabal and it was also Nixon - yes Richard Milhouse Nixon was the 1st person to suggest that Trump run for the president. I don't think that Nixon is part of the swamp - He was controlled by them though & did give Trump important words of advice to protect himself from them

5
Joys1Daughter 5 points ago +5 / -0

Another YUGE load of info from u/SemperSupra! 💥 And, from you as well u/bubble_bursts!

You guys rock! 👏

3
WentFishing 3 points ago +3 / -0

That roast was amazing, so many perverts in cold sweats !

2
bubble_bursts 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never understood the part about Haiti at that time, but looking back, Trump was going to the jugular.

2
A_whole_nother_thing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good God that was brutal. I can't believe I've never seen that roast before. Yes, there was way more significance to than then just standard roast material.

2
WentFishing 2 points ago +2 / -0

That roast was amazing, so many perverts in cold sweats !

11
Tazzurit 11 points ago +11 / -0

https://thewolf.report/2017/08/27/the-kissinger-report-and-the-world-population-control/

From the gods of babylon until now, population control and the kissinger report.

6
Tazzurit 6 points ago +6 / -0

Promote the legalization of abortion and financial incentives for countries that increase their rates of abortion, sterilization and use of contraceptive methods. Facilitate the indoctrination of children and increase the labor participation of women. Exercise coercion in developing countries to implement birth control programs (for example, conditioning humanitarian aid in cases of natural disasters).

9
Magpi 9 points ago +9 / -0

Wow, and here I was thinking it was just because she never fucking goes away.

7
CQVFEFE 7 points ago +7 / -0

What's the non-standard definition of Evergreen Q refers to

7
BQnita 7 points ago +8 / -1

Mass extinction, depopulation imho. Also, in that drop, notice the second defintion is missing an [i] u/#q3856

4
CQVFEFE 4 points ago +4 / -0

I found a definition for evergreen listed under "law":

used to describe a legal agreement that will automatically renew (= start again) unless one of the people or businesses involved officially ends it: evergreen clause/provision/agreement

An important goal for every agent is an “evergreen” clause which provides for continuing commissions after an agreement ends.

Evergreen letters of credit may be rolled over indefinitely until the issuing bank provides a written notice of its final expiration.

Not sure how this might relate, but Q did say non-standard defintion...

And I just accidentally mistyped definition right there, without the middle i :)....seems like a typo for Q too, there were several over the years

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/evergreen

/wordnerd

2
Enlightenment_Now 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's also evergreen content -- articles that don't get stale. For example, an article on how to grow roses.

4
MAGA_mandalorian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Should we then keep a lookout for posts related to Killary/evergreen that have an extra I somewhere? Might lead us to something if we keep our eyes peeled

4
What-Me-Worry 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nice catch. Saw that also.

Defintion is a some sort of weapon. Right?

Any etymology experts here?

RESEARCH WANTED

7
ArtemisY 7 points ago +7 / -0

That makes a lot of sense when you consider 'Going Green' is how I believe they plan on depopulating the planet. By that I mean, the Great Food Transformation of the Great Reset. I cover it in a video. Essentially, they're going to use heavily modified GMOs to genetically modify the entire population into perfect slaves. A large portion of the population won't survive the transformation and the rest will be completely controlled. There is a ton of clues in Q referring to genetics. Also, Evergreen is a famous chess game where the Queen was sacrificed to win the game. Likely, a double meaning hidden there, as well.

https://rumble.com/v14qcnq-the-great-food-transformation-the-modus-operandi-of-the-great-reset.html

Some genetic clues in Q:

https://greatawakening.win/p/15HvBhvEmG/proper-context-is-critical-in-un/c/

7
Beat_it_Commie 7 points ago +7 / -0

You had a great thread here - shame it didn't get much more traction. You might have gotten some more comments if you had used the Q drop linking system by using the "u/#q3599" within your post, just to make it a little more visual and easier to follow with your links.

The video was excellent as well. It makes sense to me, assuming we were on the time line of the The Great Reset, which we are not. However, it's absolutely insidious what the Cabal had planned for us - pure evil. Maybe this is what would lead to the Mark of the Beast, but tough to speculate. Cabal has been poisoning us for decades through the use of everyday products/food, so while evil, it's hard to wrap your head around.

I think we can both agree that we are living through WW3 right at this very moment, playing out physically and spiritually, on multiple battlefronts. However, people will perish, but I don't believe it will happen to the extent you describe. If Patriots are truly in control, then I don't believe that will occur on the massive scale the Cabal is looking for. Maybe the "4-6% lost forever" describes both unawakened AND people who perish, now that I think about it.

Regardless, it just means that patriots need to prep, prep, prep to be able to ride out the precipice event, which will pivot into The Great Awakening.

2
ArtemisY 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's already started. Solid research out there now, ~6 months old, showing the nRNA vaccines can indeed write to DNA. Hundreds of millions have already begun the process. We are no where near done and if people are thinking this is the final body count, millions dead due to covid and the vaccines, they are not going to fair well the next 5 years.

This war is far from over and they are going to implement a massive portion of the Great Reset. It will be stopped eventually but Q made it clear. The people have to see. They can't be told, they must see it to believe. We haven't seen anything yet. Half the population is still asleep. Hell, half our side is still barely awake.

There is nothing standing between us and this Great Food Transformation and almost no one knows about it and the ones that do are outright dismissing it. I really hope I'm wrong and would love to tell you a year from now you were right but I seriously doubt it. They have already started the genetic modification with the first wave. People are lying to themselves if they think we are close to the end.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abf1771

2
Beat_it_Commie 2 points ago +2 / -0

While I don't disagree with your assessment here....it's definitely a bit more doom and gloom than I'd like to think will actually happen lol. It has to be on a biblical scale, so the people see with their own eyes some of the destruction, as you and Q have reiterated. But I'm not certain that bodybags lining the streetcorners ALA the videogame "The Division" is necessary for the precipice lol.

Part of me thinks that this clownshow has to get wrapped up before 2024, but not many people are making arguments for The Great Reset continuing beyond that timeframe, which now when you mention it, has me worried. I've got about a ~6 month food supply, but now I'm kinda thinking....that's not enough unless I want to ingest my friendly neighborhood Gatesvaxx :/

Let's just say I hope we are BOTH wrong and something happens nobody has theorized yet :)

2
ArtemisY 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have high confidence this entire war is being driven by a timeframe that ends around early 2030, for some reason. 6 months of food should be enough. If its not, it doesn't matter anyways. We'll be ok and we will win it's just most don't understand what's coming. We're not going back to normal. Kansas is going bye bye. We will still win and humanity will persevere but the gene therapy has already started. With possibly a billion people or more.

Their Great Reset is just getting started. How this fall goes down will determine the next 5 years but we shall see. I'm hoping Bill Gates strings have actually been cut, divorce with wife is bigger than most realize, and he's actually growing staple crops with the 'cure' but I'm not certain. Have to research it more. I assure you, despite all this doom, I will be the one saying it the loudest: the best truly is yet to come. We just gotta survive to see it.

1
Beat_it_Commie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the pep talk. 2030....big oof man! I hope you are wrong lol. I guess personally, I think we each major event that occurs, more people are waking up to the fact that something isn't right anymore. With Truth Social starting up and Twatter relenting with the censorship/bots, I feel like more truth to the reality of our situation is getting out there.

Ultimately, whatever is going to happen in the next couple of years, has to lead the world back into a God-fearing and lawfully justice society. We've strayed so far, it's going to have to take a lot to straighten us out, by the grace of God. So yes, Kansas will be vacated, but we'll be going to a much better place, so fully agree there.

4
Devolution1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

Great post. I thought I heard a brief mention of this in “Durham Is Coming, Episode 1,” by TruthBomb2 on Rumble. I’ll have to watch it again. This is in-depth. Thank u for sharing it.

4
PeaceAndLovePatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can't read that tiny font...

But incase it wasn't added...

The origin is Babylon.

Nimrod was represented as an evergreen representing the falluce / everlasting life. Also the origin of the Xmas tree.

Knowing this.. Hilary represents the WHORE OF BABYLON.

2
BetsyRossRocks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Open image in new tab. Allows magnifying to your heart's content.

1
PeaceAndLovePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gotcha. I didn't see the nimrod reference.

4
WeAreThePlan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Juicy stuff. I had no idea about the connection to Nixon. I wonder why the globalists took him down then?

11
SemperSupra [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

Nixon was eager to please his "masters" and push their depopulation agenda. He did everything they asked like a good rat. However, he was just their pawn. When they'd finished using him to "ruin the republicans" and slaughter the US economy through the green agenda, they used him to deal big damage to the republican party. They thought his impeachment, trial and resignation would be a death blow to the republican party.

They made a miscalculation. They were STUNNED when Carter almost lost to Ford. They really through they'd get a Nixon landslide for Jimmy Carter. It didn't happen.

2
Monomial 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think they ever wanted to destroy the Republican party. That would never fly. But I theorize they did want the next Republican president to be Rockefeller. And to pull that off, some chicanery was necessary. They needed to get him into the Whitehouse as VP, because the 3 previous attempts to secure the Republican nomination for him had failed. Voters were concerned he was too wealthy. So he just wasn't going to get in by any other mechanism. As the last Republican VP, he would make an obvious candidate for president.

But I think you are correct they almost blew it with Carter. He was very unpopular, but they needed a Democrat to push the environmental agenda. Unfortunately, Reagan stepped into the picture about the same time in 1975 and became a thorn in their side. He was so popular in 1980 they had to abandon their ambitions for Rockefeller.

3
Galvatron27 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are such a brilliant individual. I pray others in your life see this in you because I'm astonished at the amount of information you can recall about this stuff. Never take a vax or give one to your children because if they are supposed to knock out the brightest of us all then brother I do fear it's meant especially for people like you. May God bless you and your family always and I pray we get to see all this come crashing down together.

2
HunnyB 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree Semper, and Sleepydude are two people really good at reading symbols I'm not even close to their level. They're just gifted at it.

3
ceegeegee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow, you guys are good...

2
Michonne21 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for the post! I knew Evergreen had a sinister meaning but I never got past the obvious. Gréât information! Thanks again! NCSWIC

2
7Nick9 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fascinating decode ! Thanks for posting.

2
DiveAndBait 2 points ago +2 / -0

In part, I believe that the CCP is controlled by the cabal. I think it was the aid that the US gave to the commies when they were fighting the nationalists and the CCP made promises. I even saw a letter written by Mao to whoever was the US president at the time capitulating China sovereignty.

But your post kinda filled in the gaps of why I may be right.

Now, though, it's not clear what's China's position, for or against the cabal. If China and Russia and the (Trump's) US got together to and started making noise that the Dems started the fake pandemic then we'll know for sure.

2
january20 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good dig. Thanks for sharing.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DoMagnum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Climate Crisis, Green New Deal, Depopulation; all part of the same beast. Genius really. The very instrument of their destruction is zealously embraced as virtue by the smooth-brains. Like some super-drug, the crave it, they need it. Try to get between a junkie and their fix and tell me how it goes.

3
thisjoeknows 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also interesting...wasn’t it the early 70s when US manufacturers started leaving in droves, which also led to today’s current state of affairs. I would love to read a similar deep take on that piece of the puzzle. I’m sure the same scumbags engineered that as well.

2
DoMagnum 2 points ago +2 / -0

No doubt. I live in one of the many graveyards of that 70's exodus. Same as it ever was.

1
DoMagnum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who knew? I thought for sure it was related to the size of her favorite Butt-Plug.

-2
Bigly2020 -2 points ago +1 / -3

I thought it meant her snatch was full of moss