Women are proving to be their own worst enemies. Tend and Befriending is the reason why women have allowed this incursion to occur. If only they championed their unique qualifications and embraced their God-given purpose, instead of being told they could have everything men have, they wouldn't be seeing transvestites entering their space.
Women in general (not all, but many), have allowed this woke bullshit to take root.
It became trendy for women to have gay, male friends, which helped start the mainstreaming of this. All the cable networks that cater towards women... E, TLC, DIY, Bravo, etc started pushing the shows featuring gay, then eventually trans people, and women ate that shit up.
Progressive, white women are currently the most destructive force, culturally and morally, on the planet.
They appropriately named it white guilt. Women are very empathetic which can be a great trait but at the same time they can put themselves in the shoes of white slave owners generations ago and feel like it is up to her to change the past
It seems you are quite right. When I say women have a proclivity of using a 'Tend' and 'Befriend' strategy of survival instead of 'Fight' or 'Flight', it is by empirical evidence. These contrasting attributes are gender specific and reflected in government policy. Myer-Levy of the University of Chicago Business School has provided us a method of analyzing male and female operants. Through her research she showed why women are easily sold fashion and men are not. In the simplest definition, it is the difference how women and men view the world. Are women easily influenced by fashions and trends so that they feel accepted? Are women’s decisions prejudiced as a result? In her study, she sums it up by stating women “integrate,” and **men “eliminate.”**1, 2 She further describes women as inclusive as opposed to exclusive. The author uses the words “affiliate” and “projected association” to describe the same. This correlates with the communal attributes of women in contrast to the individualistic traits found in men, especially Caucasian males. Myer-Levy’s “Selectivity hypothesis” is important because it reveals that feminine and masculine interpretation can be applied not only to advertising such as in magazine ads,3 but also to demographics as populations; businesses, governments, law, race, creed, culture, and religion.
It is in a politician's interest to foster a manipulated electorate and in the aggregate, women may be regarded as voting cattle. Indeed, women make it quite possible for control of the political landscape. The addition of women to the voting population makes modeling political and economic outcomes possible. This feat otherwise might not exist with, say, an all white male population (i.e. non-linear, male independence; each male prefers his own territory, etc.).
There are recent studies suggesting women are easily exploited. It appears women increasingly employ specious arguments and faulty reasoning to justify their actions. Kenski and Jamieson conducted surveys concerning knowledge of candidates during political campaigns in 1996 and 2000.1 During both campaigns men were more likely to answer questions about political issues correctly. In 1996, if women did not know the correct answers, they were more likely to say, “I don’t know.” In 2000, women were still more likely to answer more questions incorrectly, but were less likely to say, “I don’t know.” Jamieson declared, "Local news watching makes you dumber."2 This implies that women are more susceptible to propaganda, misinformation, political advertising/sound-bites, and the Big Lie. Another interesting relationship that appears to back up the gullibility claim involves the “Trends in International Math and Science Study” (TIMSS) assessments. TIMSS is the most comprehensive and rigorous assessment for reliable and timely data on the mathematics and science achievement of students. A surprising result showed that 12th grade girls scored lower on a third of the multiple choice questions than if they had guessed. This alludes that there was some factor that influenced them to answer the questions wrong. Was it false women’s intuition? Indeed, it is not that girls are stupid. On the contrary, women are bright and energetic counterparts to males. It appears to be another case of someone not knowing that they don’t know what they think they know.
When I say women have a proclivity of using a 'Tend' and 'Befriend' strategy of survival instead of 'Fight' or 'Flight', it is by empirical evidence.
So women, according to the Bible, are meant to be meek and supportive and loving and caring. If they aren't, they're everything that's wrong with the world today and the total cause of why we're in the predicament we're in. And yet when they act exactly how you're implying they're supposed to act they're suddenly WRONG for it? Which way do you want them to act, then? Do you want them to sit there and not speak until spoken to?
Are women easily influenced by fashions and trends so that they feel accepted?
I'm trying so hard not to lose my shit here. Are you insane?
Go ahead and take a look at golfers. Do they all wear the same exact kinds of clothes of the highest brands/status? How about businessmen? In fact, with golf, it's literally a requirement for no discernable reason other than appearance.
So...were the women influenced and decided to pick out all of their clothes, or were men just as easily swayed by fashion trends that ARE STILL ONGOING?
In her study, she sums it up by stating women “integrate,” and **men “eliminate.”
This makes no fucking sense.
This correlates with the communal attributes of women in contrast to the individualistic traits found in men, especially Caucasian males.
This also makes no fucking sense. Hurr durr all men are unique but all women are just the same.
This feat otherwise might not exist with, say, an all white male population (i.e. non-linear, male independence; each male prefers his own territory, etc.).
Which is exactly why loser men proudly proclaim themselves as alphas vs. betas, because all men are "individualistic". Seriously, you can look at a man and get an idea of his overall attitude. Some men are gentler and more meek than others, and that alone would influence their vote. The meeker man may want a calmer, kinder candidate while the one that sees himself as and prides himself on being an alpha would want the stronger, more abrasive candidate. These are extremely generalized examples, but you get my drift.
There are recent studies suggesting women are easily exploited. It appears women increasingly employ specious arguments and faulty reasoning to justify their actions.
This just in - men and women think differently, and apparently that means women are functionally retarded and easily manipulated. But don't worry, they aren't stupid (even though that's exactly what you're implying) - they're "bright and energetic".
You're so high up on your horse that you don't even know what you want out of women.
I regret you seem to not comprehend what was written in my post. I wrote the following that you seemed to have not read.
"On the contrary, women are bright and energetic counterparts to males. It appears to be another case of someone not knowing that they don’t know what they think they know."
That last sentence seems to be confirmed in your response. The information I posted are sourced by the following researchers. In other words, it's not my opinion. It's based on several academic studies. It's the same reason why women are targeted by advertisers. They are by far the largest TV demographic. Understanding 'why' this is reveals why women are targeted with lies by Marxist propagandists. It is mainly through women that's changing the fabric of this nation from one that is of liberty to one that is a promised 'safety'. Again, this is not my opinion, John R. Lott, Jr., Yale University Lawrence, and W. Kenny University of Florida published this study in Did Women’s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?.
-- Ibid. “Now, is that a male or a female ad?" she asked. . . "It's female. Look at the picture. It's just the Alps, and then they label it 'Our factory.' They're using a metaphor. . . Her point was that this is an ad that works only if the viewer appreciates all its elements-if the viewer integrates, not selects.”
-- Kathleen Hall Jamieson, “The Primary Campaign: What Did The Candidates Say, What Did The Public Learn, And Did It Matter?” Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.
-- Samuel Silver, “The 'Gender Gap' explained: Robbing Peter & Paul to pay Mary!,” Jewish World Review Oct. 31, 2000/ 2 Mar-Cheshvan, 5761
-- Paul Recer, “New study says female brain is wired for emotion,” Washington (AP), Turhan Canli, John E. Desmond, Zuo Zhao and John D. E. Gabrieli are all authors of the study. www.salon.com/mwt/wire/2002/07/22/female_brain/index.html
-- Shelley E. Taylor, Laura Cousino Klein, Brian P. Lewis, Tara L. Gruenewald, Regan A. R. Gurung, and John A. Updegraff UCLA, “Biobehavioral Responses to Stress in Females: Tend-and-Befriend, Not Fight-or-Flight,”
-- The word – “integrate” means the female mental process of projected association (see Joan Levy-Myers research, “Females integrate, Men eliminate”). The author uses the words – “affiliate” and “projected association” to describe the same.
Which is exactly why loser men proudly proclaim themselves as alphas vs. betas, because all men are "individualistic". Seriously, you can look at a man and get an idea of his overall attitude. Some men are gentler and more meek than others, and that alone would influence their vote. The meeker man may want a calmer, kinder candidate while the one that sees himself as and prides himself on being an alpha would want the stronger, more abrasive candidate. These are extremely generalized examples, but you get my drift.
Go vote for Hilary, feminazi. I am what you explain "gentle and meek" in person but you have no idea how our minds work. Trump FTW, get fucked thinking we want to be lead by weaklings just cause we aren't your typical dudebro.
Why do you go straight to blaming women for being friendly, of all things, rather than the men that are gay in the first place?
lol do you really think women being friendly is what magically made more men gay? You should lay the blame where it belongs: the liberal agenda.
Progressive, white women are currently the most destructive force, culturally and morally, on the planet.
lol wut.
Liberals: Straight white men are everything wrong with this world!!
'Patriot': That's sexist AND racist and you're just pushing an agenda to ruin the world!
Same 'Patriot': Progressive white women are currently the most destructive force, culturally and morally, on the planet.
Women have been forced into the new "can have everything men have" mindset because of circumstance.
Husbands abandoning their families, rising costs of living requiring both spouses working (thus creating a drive to move forward in a career, because who wouldn't want to?), unable to marry a man because so many of them are total garbage (just like a lot of women are) or because they're traumatized by abusive men from previous relationships, being misunderstood and unappreciated for the work that they do...I could go on and on.
To assume that a woman shouldn't have what a man has is insane. Will a woman ever be as strong, or biologically the same? Of course not. But should a woman have the same rights as a man if she wants them? Yes. She's as human as a man and this mindset of women needing to be meek servants to men is exactly why we're in the position we're in. So, so many women get treated like crap by their men, whether it's their father or spouse. And when they DO fulfill their "God-given purpose" they get called naggy bitches and ball-and-chains. Damned if you do, damned if you don't I guess.
I am 100% for the great awakening but mindsets like yours also terrify me for my place in all of this.
I've been through enough rape and abuse for a lifetime. I don't want it magically being even more okay than it already is in the future.
Is no more true than wives abandoning their families. Contrary to the studies, the Marxist propagandists tell us otherwise. Shere Hite bragged on national TV: "70% of American wives commit adultery within 5 years of getting married".
Men are just pissed because trannies have social status above them, and now they and their kids are gonna be subject to the same sexual laws they previously placed on women and children when they declared “what a man does is his own business and ordained by God, himself.”
You fixen to learn.
Didn’t want see that half naked person? Didn’t wanna have those images in your mind? Didn’t wanna know people could be so depraved?
Awwww…. you’re not woman enough to get it, but also, damn (my) bitch…. why don’t YOU look and act like that…. it’s for me, after all….. the true alpha male?
Need to lose that fat, learn what pleases me, and perform for me with enthusiam.
Get ready to wiggle your ass for shekels, bc YOU allowed and cheered on all the naked women and degeneracy when it was only YOUR vice that held any sway.
Now globohomo is taking over, and it ain’t the wife the rapist is looking at😂.
Sounds like the words from the demi-goddess 'Lilith' herself. Notice I said "demi" meaning -- lesser. Remember behind the curtain, it is always a very powerful male that controls the levers of society. The entire vile and demented tapestry of social engineering and public policy is for destroying the Creator's Natural Order.
You appear to be yet another case of someone not knowing that they don’t know what they think they know. It seems you have no idea, but instead use crude and vile words.
You seeing what’s happening in the world right now with with people openly expressing their inner sexual desire- that’s you learning what you didn’t know that you didn’t know.
And yet you seem to be utterly shocked and disgusted by it, and laying the blame at the feet of checks notes….. females🧐.
Because the liberal, progressive, woke, communist left are themselves the embodiment of hypocrisy. They have no problem saying or doing something, then the next day do or say the exact opposite. They don't see it as lying or being deceitful because they totally believe in situational ethics. Whatever seems right in the moment is OK. if they wear blackface at a afternoon office party, and later see a conservative leaving a bachelor party in blackface they will scream, yell and virtue signal in protest. They say women have a right to abortion because it's "my body, my choice". Yet if they see a conservative refuse the C19 vax they immediately call them selfish and demand forced mandatory vaccinations. Your body and you don't get a choice, got that?. At it's essence, what they want is good, what you want doesn't matter. They can say anything anytime and you can't open your mouth or you're deemed a racist, homophobe or domestic terrorist.
Some of them don’t realize they’re being hypocritical, but some of them do. You know how the CIA seeded the phrase “conspiracy theorist” to try to discredit their detractors? AC has an idea that cabal also seeded the phrase “don’t attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity.” It gives cabal cover to play dumb about their misdeeds. When we see wrong things in the world, we shouldn’t assume stupidity, we should take a closer look to see if we should attribute to malice.
The entire 'Trans Movement' is to further decay western civilization.
They saw a way to not only exploit this 'trend' to gain power but also to destroy your typical Christian conservative valued household.
Camille Paglia, who herself is a lesbian semi-trans feminist, a liberal but not a leftist has said that embracing gender confusion is one of the last acts of a collapsing civilization.
Asking if the trans caused the collapse or the collapse caused the trans is a sort of chicken an egg question.
In my opinion, when a society gets to the point where they are comfortable and crazy enough for “luxuries” like chopping your balls off bc you feel like it ….it’s going down
When you consider MSM and companies like Disney, they didn't exploit the trend, they created the illusion of it being a trend so their woke liberal friends could push it out in every direction. The virtue signaling lemmings in the Dem party pile on in an attempt to show how smart and cool they are. The net result you correctly point out is the destruction of traditional family values and the diminishment of parental influence on their children.
As a woman, it takes a ton of work to look nice. We get shunted from other women if we don't fit a specific standard. Fasion wise. Hygine wise. And beyond.
I havent eaten a cookie, or cheeseburger, in forever. My husband can eat candy bars and look fit. I can't even think about them.
Then you get these mother fuckers.
In tacky yellow stockings with high heals, beer belly, neon green nail polish, and a god damn beard.
Demanding to be treated like a 5 star women who works hard on her appearance.
Fuck him. He couldnt handle being a real women.
Trannies are lazy fucking human beings.
Too lazy to be a man, too lazy to be a women. So they straddle the fence, half assing life, riding the privilege train.
Dang girl, I'm a woman too but I don't get harassed like that at all. I'm neither stylish nor do I spend hours to look good. Sure, some women care more others less but generally I can get along with most women even if they dress super fancily. Are the women really that toxic around you?
Nah lol. I mean more back at school and in the work place. (And maybe my grandmother lol)
Im typically casual. But women still spend a lot of time taking care of themselves. At least I have to.
Id totally give them props if they dressed well. Many do Im sure. But lately the mainstream trend for trans has been to look like an unkept dude and idk. Feels lazy. It feels like it diminishes our work and Its kind of insulting.
They want to get away with doing less and expect to be treated better.
How old is your husband? I was very high performance, lots of training and exercise, and could eat anything I want. Then when I turned 31 or 32, it's like a switch flipped. Still the same performance and training and such, but I lost my ability to eat carelessly almost overnight.
No but ive read a lot about this topic, add in statistics, and there is a reason men suicide and depression rates are higher. Men carry a heavier burden than women do the way society and gender differences are structured. Naturally, not artifically like leftist say.
Without knowing the details of these studies, you have to wonder if they account for emotional differences.
Is it possible that women have more emotional strength while men have more physical strength?
Or could it be because men are so heavily discouraged from expressing/releasing their emotions?
To imply that one sex has it harder than another only detracts from everyone's difficulties.
Men have it hard, that's undeniable, but to imply that women don't have it equally hard in today's society is ignorant.
Typically, men are expected to work a job, repair things around the home, tend the lawn, possibly repair cars. There could absolutely be more, but I'm not a man so I don't know the intricacies.
Typically, women are expected to work a job (at least in this economy), clean the house, do the laundry, cook the food, do the grocery shopping, and raise the children which comes with a laundry list of subtasks (cleaning them, feeding them, cleaning up after them, teaching them, entertaining them, taking them to school, picking them up, taking them to appointments and extra curriculars). And in all fairness, they're expected to look good on top of it all, including maintaining a figure after giving birth.
Even if you remove the job requirement, that's a lot for one person's plate.
A man can't know how a woman feels about her burden, nor can a woman know how a man feels about his.
But if you, a man (I'm assuming) are complaining that men have it too hard, and I, a woman, am complaining that women also have it too hard, it seems much less like a gendered issue and much more like a societal one.
Which is part of what this movement should be striving to correct, and that includes altering our perceptions of the opposite sex and whether or not they suffer as much as we do, and why would want them to in the first place.
Im a woman and I've really read a lot about it. I think modern society has been counter productive to women and is trying to put the burden men have onto us and call it liberation.
I agree with a lot of what you said, but up until this point, men have been expected to fight in wars, carry the finacial burden of the family, build the infrastructure and be the protectors of our home from the crazies (like the government lol)
I think men still carry that weight today even in the face of modernization.
They always have to pay child support and sometimes alimony. I know women who dont even have to work because of this. While men have to work twice as hard.
Women still have a lot of saftey nets, like better access to healthcare, while men pay extra for it all.
And yes. Men may have higher pay on average, but that is because they do more demanding and dangerous jobs. Im a tough girl and like hard work, but we just aren't built the way they are.
It doesn't make us less than, and we certainly do a lot of emotional work! That is very true. I feel like the general manager of the home lol. Thats a tough job.
Maybe if society was truly even, without saftey nets, women would have it super hard. Especially single mothers.
Although, think about it, today, single fathers are expected to just deal with it without help.
So it could be a symptom of society. But it seems like its usually men getting crapped on. Past and present. I could be wrong tho.
Also, I didn't just get this from scientific and opinion peices, but spiritual and philisophical as well. From the bible to buddism and some other obscure mysticism and philosophical points.
Just seems like the way things were designed, and I feel like society today is trying to bastardize that natural order to demoralize strong men so "father government" can take their place.
Not that women can't be strong leaders. Just feels like theyre trying to kill healthy masculinity and replace it.
I think they're attacking healthy feminism all the same too.
Shaming stay at home moms and deminishing what we actually do contribute.
"Let the government raise the baby, your liberated, now go work the mines like a man. Go stand on the frontlines of war like an equal."
Feels like where we are headed.
All while we have weak, gender confused, men boys, not able to stand up for us.
They always have to pay child support and sometimes alimony. I know women who dont even have to work because of this. While men have to work twice as hard.
Totally agree with this and it's something I've complained about for years. This system was brilliant when it first started. Women couldn't work/earn a living on their own, men were often the ones initiating the divorces or causing them through affairs or abandonment. Women needed that guarantee and safety net.
I still believe in having this system in place, but it needs actual work to go into it. Women often end up with nothing after divorce because everything was in the husband's name. They end up sacrificing careers to have children, so at best they've got a giant gap in their resume that makes companies unwilling to hire them, or they have next to no work experience to begin with if they married young. Their best shots at a job are minimum wage and it's simply not enough to get by on.
But a lot of POS women have wised up to how the system works and they lie and manipulate it. That's what needs to stop.
The system would be good if it were fair. If actual individual attention were paid to these cases instead of passing everything through a cookie cutter, those types of women would get exactly how little they deserve and the men would stop getting screwed over. But the government and the lawyers and the courts don't want to put in that kind of effort, so often innocent lives are destroyed as a result. Mine sure was, which is crazy because everyone argues that women basically win by default. That's just not always true.
Maybe if society was truly even, without saftey nets, women would have it super hard. Especially single mothers.
I kind of feel like being a single mother is the golden ticket. If you don't have kids, you're SOL. At least it feels that way. Because everything you're saying about women having better access to healthcare and safety nets...maybe it's just not true in my state if you don't have kids, I don't know. I'm in a red state but really blue city, so you'd think it would be different. But I reached out everywhere for help and no one could. The systems were badly backlogged, for starters.
I did a lot of studying after experiencing what I did and it seems like abuse towards women is waaaay worse than it seems like it is. With resources across all major cities in the US clogged, it's believable.
Agree with the rest of what you said, too. Men of my generation are weak. I don't like being more handy than men I meet. I can fix plumbing, appliances, do home repairs, etc. A lot of men don't seem capable of that anymore, and kudos to the ones that are.
I've long had a theory that it's in the food. My generation seems riddled with mental health issues, and I'm no exception. Something happened between the boomers and the millenials that started wrecking loads of us, conveniently all in ways that make us more reliant upon the government.
Not to mention drags and queens are the single greatest perpitrator of stereotyping women.
Its actually crazy. A man deciding what a beutiful woman is, emulates that with the focus being for people to stare and gawk. Do the same to a real woman and your the hoowhite supremez.
I never understood why, if drags want to look like women, they go so far out of their way to not look like an actual woman.
No woman looks like a drag queen. They say people like Dolly Parton are their inspiration, but they don't even try to emulate her, either - except the big hair, maybe.
The same goes for effeminate gay men. Their mannerisms, cattiness, and makeup are so far removed from realistic femininity that they've become their own breed.
I was just talking to my husband about this same thing last night. These drag queens, transwomen, gays, all these "MEN" hate women OR have no respect for them. I think it's time to call them out!
Wasn't there some white guy who got surgery to make himself look Korean? So he is trans-racial. We need to make trans-racial a thing to mock transsexuals.
How do you know it's not the media simply portraying an inaccuracy in the same way that they make the LGBT population seem waaaay bigger than it actually is?
It's the same thing. Reducing a class of people to a caricature. Women are not anything like men "in drag". Men in drag are just that, a drag. When men in drag appear, all women should boo them loudly and leave.
Women are proving to be their own worst enemies. Tend and Befriending is the reason why women have allowed this incursion to occur. If only they championed their unique qualifications and embraced their God-given purpose, instead of being told they could have everything men have, they wouldn't be seeing transvestites entering their space.
Women in general (not all, but many), have allowed this woke bullshit to take root.
It became trendy for women to have gay, male friends, which helped start the mainstreaming of this. All the cable networks that cater towards women... E, TLC, DIY, Bravo, etc started pushing the shows featuring gay, then eventually trans people, and women ate that shit up.
Progressive, white women are currently the most destructive force, culturally and morally, on the planet.
I never understood progressive white women fighting against white people. Like, you're white, what are you doing, retard?
The level of idiocy is beyond me.
They appropriately named it white guilt. Women are very empathetic which can be a great trait but at the same time they can put themselves in the shoes of white slave owners generations ago and feel like it is up to her to change the past
It seems you are quite right. When I say women have a proclivity of using a 'Tend' and 'Befriend' strategy of survival instead of 'Fight' or 'Flight', it is by empirical evidence. These contrasting attributes are gender specific and reflected in government policy. Myer-Levy of the University of Chicago Business School has provided us a method of analyzing male and female operants. Through her research she showed why women are easily sold fashion and men are not. In the simplest definition, it is the difference how women and men view the world. Are women easily influenced by fashions and trends so that they feel accepted? Are women’s decisions prejudiced as a result? In her study, she sums it up by stating women “integrate,” and **men “eliminate.”**1, 2 She further describes women as inclusive as opposed to exclusive. The author uses the words “affiliate” and “projected association” to describe the same. This correlates with the communal attributes of women in contrast to the individualistic traits found in men, especially Caucasian males. Myer-Levy’s “Selectivity hypothesis” is important because it reveals that feminine and masculine interpretation can be applied not only to advertising such as in magazine ads,3 but also to demographics as populations; businesses, governments, law, race, creed, culture, and religion.
It is in a politician's interest to foster a manipulated electorate and in the aggregate, women may be regarded as voting cattle. Indeed, women make it quite possible for control of the political landscape. The addition of women to the voting population makes modeling political and economic outcomes possible. This feat otherwise might not exist with, say, an all white male population (i.e. non-linear, male independence; each male prefers his own territory, etc.).
There are recent studies suggesting women are easily exploited. It appears women increasingly employ specious arguments and faulty reasoning to justify their actions. Kenski and Jamieson conducted surveys concerning knowledge of candidates during political campaigns in 1996 and 2000.1 During both campaigns men were more likely to answer questions about political issues correctly. In 1996, if women did not know the correct answers, they were more likely to say, “I don’t know.” In 2000, women were still more likely to answer more questions incorrectly, but were less likely to say, “I don’t know.” Jamieson declared, "Local news watching makes you dumber."2 This implies that women are more susceptible to propaganda, misinformation, political advertising/sound-bites, and the Big Lie. Another interesting relationship that appears to back up the gullibility claim involves the “Trends in International Math and Science Study” (TIMSS) assessments. TIMSS is the most comprehensive and rigorous assessment for reliable and timely data on the mathematics and science achievement of students. A surprising result showed that 12th grade girls scored lower on a third of the multiple choice questions than if they had guessed. This alludes that there was some factor that influenced them to answer the questions wrong. Was it false women’s intuition? Indeed, it is not that girls are stupid. On the contrary, women are bright and energetic counterparts to males. It appears to be another case of someone not knowing that they don’t know what they think they know.
Holy shit. Okay.
So women, according to the Bible, are meant to be meek and supportive and loving and caring. If they aren't, they're everything that's wrong with the world today and the total cause of why we're in the predicament we're in. And yet when they act exactly how you're implying they're supposed to act they're suddenly WRONG for it? Which way do you want them to act, then? Do you want them to sit there and not speak until spoken to?
I'm trying so hard not to lose my shit here. Are you insane?
Go ahead and take a look at golfers. Do they all wear the same exact kinds of clothes of the highest brands/status? How about businessmen? In fact, with golf, it's literally a requirement for no discernable reason other than appearance.
So...were the women influenced and decided to pick out all of their clothes, or were men just as easily swayed by fashion trends that ARE STILL ONGOING?
This makes no fucking sense.
This also makes no fucking sense. Hurr durr all men are unique but all women are just the same.
Which is exactly why loser men proudly proclaim themselves as alphas vs. betas, because all men are "individualistic". Seriously, you can look at a man and get an idea of his overall attitude. Some men are gentler and more meek than others, and that alone would influence their vote. The meeker man may want a calmer, kinder candidate while the one that sees himself as and prides himself on being an alpha would want the stronger, more abrasive candidate. These are extremely generalized examples, but you get my drift.
This just in - men and women think differently, and apparently that means women are functionally retarded and easily manipulated. But don't worry, they aren't stupid (even though that's exactly what you're implying) - they're "bright and energetic".
You're so high up on your horse that you don't even know what you want out of women.
I regret you seem to not comprehend what was written in my post. I wrote the following that you seemed to have not read.
That last sentence seems to be confirmed in your response. The information I posted are sourced by the following researchers. In other words, it's not my opinion. It's based on several academic studies. It's the same reason why women are targeted by advertisers. They are by far the largest TV demographic. Understanding 'why' this is reveals why women are targeted with lies by Marxist propagandists. It is mainly through women that's changing the fabric of this nation from one that is of liberty to one that is a promised 'safety'. Again, this is not my opinion, John R. Lott, Jr., Yale University Lawrence, and W. Kenny University of Florida published this study in Did Women’s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?.
-- Joan Meyers-Levy , “Mixed Messages - How Men And Women Differ In Their Responses To Marketing Messages,” http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/news/capideas/sum98/meyers.htm
-- Malcolm Gladwell, “Listening to Khakis,” The New Yorker, http://www.gladwell.com/1997/1997_07_27_a_khaki.htm.
-- Ibid. “Now, is that a male or a female ad?" she asked. . . "It's female. Look at the picture. It's just the Alps, and then they label it 'Our factory.' They're using a metaphor. . . Her point was that this is an ad that works only if the viewer appreciates all its elements-if the viewer integrates, not selects.”
-- Kathleen Hall Jamieson, “The Primary Campaign: What Did The Candidates Say, What Did The Public Learn, And Did It Matter?” Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.
-- Samuel Silver, “The 'Gender Gap' explained: Robbing Peter & Paul to pay Mary!,” Jewish World Review Oct. 31, 2000/ 2 Mar-Cheshvan, 5761
-- Paul Recer, “New study says female brain is wired for emotion,” Washington (AP), Turhan Canli, John E. Desmond, Zuo Zhao and John D. E. Gabrieli are all authors of the study. www.salon.com/mwt/wire/2002/07/22/female_brain/index.html
-- Shelley E. Taylor, Laura Cousino Klein, Brian P. Lewis, Tara L. Gruenewald, Regan A. R. Gurung, and John A. Updegraff UCLA, “Biobehavioral Responses to Stress in Females: Tend-and-Befriend, Not Fight-or-Flight,”
-- The word – “integrate” means the female mental process of projected association (see Joan Levy-Myers research, “Females integrate, Men eliminate”). The author uses the words – “affiliate” and “projected association” to describe the same.
Simp alert
Oh right. No girls on the internet. Sorry, I forgot.
Woman brain was the other option.
Go vote for Hilary, feminazi. I am what you explain "gentle and meek" in person but you have no idea how our minds work. Trump FTW, get fucked thinking we want to be lead by weaklings just cause we aren't your typical dudebro.
Imagine writing all that and not even understanding “extremely generalized examples”.
I’d never vote for Hillary. I’ve been a Trump supporter since 2016.
Why do you go straight to blaming women for being friendly, of all things, rather than the men that are gay in the first place?
lol do you really think women being friendly is what magically made more men gay? You should lay the blame where it belongs: the liberal agenda.
lol wut.
Liberals: Straight white men are everything wrong with this world!! 'Patriot': That's sexist AND racist and you're just pushing an agenda to ruin the world! Same 'Patriot': Progressive white women are currently the most destructive force, culturally and morally, on the planet.
...
In the comments in this thread...which is it?:
Later in this topic: ... "Women are responsible for degenerate male behavior" https://greatawakening.win/p/15IETIOCRv/x/c/4OZopYO4gJM
...Or from another topic from earlier: ... "Stop blaming women for males behaving badly" https://greatawakening.win/p/13zgIz7l4d/x/c/4JFpVJ93OQl
Again, which is it?
Not all women are single moms, yet.
Okay, no.
Women have been forced into the new "can have everything men have" mindset because of circumstance.
Husbands abandoning their families, rising costs of living requiring both spouses working (thus creating a drive to move forward in a career, because who wouldn't want to?), unable to marry a man because so many of them are total garbage (just like a lot of women are) or because they're traumatized by abusive men from previous relationships, being misunderstood and unappreciated for the work that they do...I could go on and on.
To assume that a woman shouldn't have what a man has is insane. Will a woman ever be as strong, or biologically the same? Of course not. But should a woman have the same rights as a man if she wants them? Yes. She's as human as a man and this mindset of women needing to be meek servants to men is exactly why we're in the position we're in. So, so many women get treated like crap by their men, whether it's their father or spouse. And when they DO fulfill their "God-given purpose" they get called naggy bitches and ball-and-chains. Damned if you do, damned if you don't I guess.
I am 100% for the great awakening but mindsets like yours also terrify me for my place in all of this.
I've been through enough rape and abuse for a lifetime. I don't want it magically being even more okay than it already is in the future.
Well it sounds like a pretty bad situation. Yikes.
Is no more true than wives abandoning their families. Contrary to the studies, the Marxist propagandists tell us otherwise. Shere Hite bragged on national TV: "70% of American wives commit adultery within 5 years of getting married".
Men are just pissed because trannies have social status above them, and now they and their kids are gonna be subject to the same sexual laws they previously placed on women and children when they declared “what a man does is his own business and ordained by God, himself.”
You fixen to learn.
Didn’t want see that half naked person? Didn’t wanna have those images in your mind? Didn’t wanna know people could be so depraved?
Awwww…. you’re not woman enough to get it, but also, damn (my) bitch…. why don’t YOU look and act like that…. it’s for me, after all….. the true alpha male?
Need to lose that fat, learn what pleases me, and perform for me with enthusiam.
Get ready to wiggle your ass for shekels, bc YOU allowed and cheered on all the naked women and degeneracy when it was only YOUR vice that held any sway.
Now globohomo is taking over, and it ain’t the wife the rapist is looking at😂.
would hate to be you right about now
Also, cute * ass
Edit: *tight
Sounds like the words from the demi-goddess 'Lilith' herself. Notice I said "demi" meaning -- lesser. Remember behind the curtain, it is always a very powerful male that controls the levers of society. The entire vile and demented tapestry of social engineering and public policy is for destroying the Creator's Natural Order.
Fucking hell you people believe anything that gives you the ultimate dominance.
Once you comprehend it with your ego in check- then you’ll finally get it.
Behind the veil is a group of men that control it all. Women are their gynaeceum.
Hahahaha. You said it, not me.
Thanks for admitting that women and children are/were man’s defense system for millennia.
Now that your hole might be violated, it’s suddenly against God himself.
Do you even hear yourself?
You appear to be yet another case of someone not knowing that they don’t know what they think they know. It seems you have no idea, but instead use crude and vile words.
So long.
You seeing what’s happening in the world right now with with people openly expressing their inner sexual desire- that’s you learning what you didn’t know that you didn’t know.
And yet you seem to be utterly shocked and disgusted by it, and laying the blame at the feet of checks notes….. females🧐.
That’s absolute brilliance!
Because the liberal, progressive, woke, communist left are themselves the embodiment of hypocrisy. They have no problem saying or doing something, then the next day do or say the exact opposite. They don't see it as lying or being deceitful because they totally believe in situational ethics. Whatever seems right in the moment is OK. if they wear blackface at a afternoon office party, and later see a conservative leaving a bachelor party in blackface they will scream, yell and virtue signal in protest. They say women have a right to abortion because it's "my body, my choice". Yet if they see a conservative refuse the C19 vax they immediately call them selfish and demand forced mandatory vaccinations. Your body and you don't get a choice, got that?. At it's essence, what they want is good, what you want doesn't matter. They can say anything anytime and you can't open your mouth or you're deemed a racist, homophobe or domestic terrorist.
Some of them don’t realize they’re being hypocritical, but some of them do. You know how the CIA seeded the phrase “conspiracy theorist” to try to discredit their detractors? AC has an idea that cabal also seeded the phrase “don’t attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity.” It gives cabal cover to play dumb about their misdeeds. When we see wrong things in the world, we shouldn’t assume stupidity, we should take a closer look to see if we should attribute to malice.
I guess you saw this then.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JMUUw6KeM0&t=260s
The entire 'Trans Movement' is to further decay western civilization. They saw a way to not only exploit this 'trend' to gain power but also to destroy your typical Christian conservative valued household.
Camille Paglia, who herself is a lesbian semi-trans feminist, a liberal but not a leftist has said that embracing gender confusion is one of the last acts of a collapsing civilization.
Asking if the trans caused the collapse or the collapse caused the trans is a sort of chicken an egg question.
In my opinion, when a society gets to the point where they are comfortable and crazy enough for “luxuries” like chopping your balls off bc you feel like it ….it’s going down
When you consider MSM and companies like Disney, they didn't exploit the trend, they created the illusion of it being a trend so their woke liberal friends could push it out in every direction. The virtue signaling lemmings in the Dem party pile on in an attempt to show how smart and cool they are. The net result you correctly point out is the destruction of traditional family values and the diminishment of parental influence on their children.
Im going to rant.
As a woman, it takes a ton of work to look nice. We get shunted from other women if we don't fit a specific standard. Fasion wise. Hygine wise. And beyond.
I havent eaten a cookie, or cheeseburger, in forever. My husband can eat candy bars and look fit. I can't even think about them.
Then you get these mother fuckers.
In tacky yellow stockings with high heals, beer belly, neon green nail polish, and a god damn beard.
Demanding to be treated like a 5 star women who works hard on her appearance.
Fuck him. He couldnt handle being a real women.
Trannies are lazy fucking human beings.
Too lazy to be a man, too lazy to be a women. So they straddle the fence, half assing life, riding the privilege train.
Good rant and an interesting point of view.
Dang girl, I'm a woman too but I don't get harassed like that at all. I'm neither stylish nor do I spend hours to look good. Sure, some women care more others less but generally I can get along with most women even if they dress super fancily. Are the women really that toxic around you?
Nah lol. I mean more back at school and in the work place. (And maybe my grandmother lol)
Im typically casual. But women still spend a lot of time taking care of themselves. At least I have to.
Id totally give them props if they dressed well. Many do Im sure. But lately the mainstream trend for trans has been to look like an unkept dude and idk. Feels lazy. It feels like it diminishes our work and Its kind of insulting.
They want to get away with doing less and expect to be treated better.
Sports. Appearance. Workforce. Etc.
Idk lol.
I was drunk and ranting to be honest.
How old is your husband? I was very high performance, lots of training and exercise, and could eat anything I want. Then when I turned 31 or 32, it's like a switch flipped. Still the same performance and training and such, but I lost my ability to eat carelessly almost overnight.
Hmm. Hes 32 but we live a fairly active lifestyle on a homestead, plus his job is physical. I guess well see if it catches up with him lol.
Agree, but let's be fair here - there's plenty of criticism from the men, too.
Being a guy is super tough. Tougher than being a chick. Pretty sure thats why alot of them wanna be women, but then they half ass that too.
So you’ve been both and can say that for sure?
No but ive read a lot about this topic, add in statistics, and there is a reason men suicide and depression rates are higher. Men carry a heavier burden than women do the way society and gender differences are structured. Naturally, not artifically like leftist say.
Spez: This is a good place to start on the topic.
Without knowing the details of these studies, you have to wonder if they account for emotional differences.
Is it possible that women have more emotional strength while men have more physical strength?
Or could it be because men are so heavily discouraged from expressing/releasing their emotions?
To imply that one sex has it harder than another only detracts from everyone's difficulties.
Men have it hard, that's undeniable, but to imply that women don't have it equally hard in today's society is ignorant.
Typically, men are expected to work a job, repair things around the home, tend the lawn, possibly repair cars. There could absolutely be more, but I'm not a man so I don't know the intricacies.
Typically, women are expected to work a job (at least in this economy), clean the house, do the laundry, cook the food, do the grocery shopping, and raise the children which comes with a laundry list of subtasks (cleaning them, feeding them, cleaning up after them, teaching them, entertaining them, taking them to school, picking them up, taking them to appointments and extra curriculars). And in all fairness, they're expected to look good on top of it all, including maintaining a figure after giving birth. Even if you remove the job requirement, that's a lot for one person's plate.
A man can't know how a woman feels about her burden, nor can a woman know how a man feels about his.
But if you, a man (I'm assuming) are complaining that men have it too hard, and I, a woman, am complaining that women also have it too hard, it seems much less like a gendered issue and much more like a societal one.
Which is part of what this movement should be striving to correct, and that includes altering our perceptions of the opposite sex and whether or not they suffer as much as we do, and why would want them to in the first place.
Im a woman and I've really read a lot about it. I think modern society has been counter productive to women and is trying to put the burden men have onto us and call it liberation.
I agree with a lot of what you said, but up until this point, men have been expected to fight in wars, carry the finacial burden of the family, build the infrastructure and be the protectors of our home from the crazies (like the government lol)
I think men still carry that weight today even in the face of modernization.
They always have to pay child support and sometimes alimony. I know women who dont even have to work because of this. While men have to work twice as hard.
Women still have a lot of saftey nets, like better access to healthcare, while men pay extra for it all.
And yes. Men may have higher pay on average, but that is because they do more demanding and dangerous jobs. Im a tough girl and like hard work, but we just aren't built the way they are.
It doesn't make us less than, and we certainly do a lot of emotional work! That is very true. I feel like the general manager of the home lol. Thats a tough job.
Maybe if society was truly even, without saftey nets, women would have it super hard. Especially single mothers.
Although, think about it, today, single fathers are expected to just deal with it without help.
So it could be a symptom of society. But it seems like its usually men getting crapped on. Past and present. I could be wrong tho.
Also, I didn't just get this from scientific and opinion peices, but spiritual and philisophical as well. From the bible to buddism and some other obscure mysticism and philosophical points.
Just seems like the way things were designed, and I feel like society today is trying to bastardize that natural order to demoralize strong men so "father government" can take their place.
Not that women can't be strong leaders. Just feels like theyre trying to kill healthy masculinity and replace it.
I think they're attacking healthy feminism all the same too. Shaming stay at home moms and deminishing what we actually do contribute.
"Let the government raise the baby, your liberated, now go work the mines like a man. Go stand on the frontlines of war like an equal."
Feels like where we are headed.
All while we have weak, gender confused, men boys, not able to stand up for us.
Sorry for the incorrect assumption.
Totally agree with this and it's something I've complained about for years. This system was brilliant when it first started. Women couldn't work/earn a living on their own, men were often the ones initiating the divorces or causing them through affairs or abandonment. Women needed that guarantee and safety net.
I still believe in having this system in place, but it needs actual work to go into it. Women often end up with nothing after divorce because everything was in the husband's name. They end up sacrificing careers to have children, so at best they've got a giant gap in their resume that makes companies unwilling to hire them, or they have next to no work experience to begin with if they married young. Their best shots at a job are minimum wage and it's simply not enough to get by on.
But a lot of POS women have wised up to how the system works and they lie and manipulate it. That's what needs to stop.
The system would be good if it were fair. If actual individual attention were paid to these cases instead of passing everything through a cookie cutter, those types of women would get exactly how little they deserve and the men would stop getting screwed over. But the government and the lawyers and the courts don't want to put in that kind of effort, so often innocent lives are destroyed as a result. Mine sure was, which is crazy because everyone argues that women basically win by default. That's just not always true.
I kind of feel like being a single mother is the golden ticket. If you don't have kids, you're SOL. At least it feels that way. Because everything you're saying about women having better access to healthcare and safety nets...maybe it's just not true in my state if you don't have kids, I don't know. I'm in a red state but really blue city, so you'd think it would be different. But I reached out everywhere for help and no one could. The systems were badly backlogged, for starters.
I did a lot of studying after experiencing what I did and it seems like abuse towards women is waaaay worse than it seems like it is. With resources across all major cities in the US clogged, it's believable.
Agree with the rest of what you said, too. Men of my generation are weak. I don't like being more handy than men I meet. I can fix plumbing, appliances, do home repairs, etc. A lot of men don't seem capable of that anymore, and kudos to the ones that are.
I've long had a theory that it's in the food. My generation seems riddled with mental health issues, and I'm no exception. Something happened between the boomers and the millenials that started wrecking loads of us, conveniently all in ways that make us more reliant upon the government.
Because these fags run things.
Not to mention drags and queens are the single greatest perpitrator of stereotyping women.
Its actually crazy. A man deciding what a beutiful woman is, emulates that with the focus being for people to stare and gawk. Do the same to a real woman and your the hoowhite supremez.
I never understood why, if drags want to look like women, they go so far out of their way to not look like an actual woman.
No woman looks like a drag queen. They say people like Dolly Parton are their inspiration, but they don't even try to emulate her, either - except the big hair, maybe.
The same goes for effeminate gay men. Their mannerisms, cattiness, and makeup are so far removed from realistic femininity that they've become their own breed.
And they go so over the top with their 'look', way beyond what normal women do.
Cultural Appropriation.
Watch those presumptuous pronouns! /s
I was just talking to my husband about this same thing last night. These drag queens, transwomen, gays, all these "MEN" hate women OR have no respect for them. I think it's time to call them out!
Wasn't there some white guy who got surgery to make himself look Korean? So he is trans-racial. We need to make trans-racial a thing to mock transsexuals.
Because women love drag shows for some reason.
Not this woman.
Ditto
Ditto.
Me neither. I find it monstrous and offensive.
Not this woman
How do you know? How many have you attended? There have been a lot of women there? I'm a woman and I've never seen a drag show. I never will.
Dittos here.
Stupid comment.
Hell no.
How do you know it's not the media simply portraying an inaccuracy in the same way that they make the LGBT population seem waaaay bigger than it actually is?
Radical feminists have been complaining about this since the '70s.
Black privilege.
It's the same thing. Reducing a class of people to a caricature. Women are not anything like men "in drag". Men in drag are just that, a drag. When men in drag appear, all women should boo them loudly and leave.
They are paying homage to trans peoples?
One is a protected species, both are being manipulated against their own interests.
Great post. Redpills locked and loaded. Fire for effect
The Communist are much smarter than the majority of women and groomer fags. That's why.