Gregg Phillips posted link to the Army's 2009 Tactics to CounterInsurgency
(armypubs.army.mil)
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Gregg Phillips' post:
Gregg Phillips
@greggphillips
·2h
The enemy of election international is operating a thousand front war. Each of the fronts operates as a local insurgency.
Here is how we beat them.
Tactics in Counterinsurgency (COIN)
#PatriotGames
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/fm3_24x2.pdf
Link to post - https://truthsocial.com/@greggphillips/posts/108551629058615362
He says it has to be fought locally.
Think globally, act locally isn't just some catchy phrase.
But note, a lot of people who say to fight globally also end up with agreeing that state law shouldn't supercede federal law... Meaning that federal law still wins in the hierarchy.
More has to happen than just local wins.
Right now, states do not actually have the right to prevent the federal government from, say, making an arrest in a state. All they can do is say they won't assist or require fees for aid.
I need to check again, but I thought elected sheriffs were the highest law enforcement authority in any county. Could even arrest feds that violate their authority.
That said, election fraud will remove them if they exercise that authority. Individual counties will lose this, though showing systemic corruption with elections & getting multiple elected sheriffs on board with taking it down on a county level & exerting their authority at the same time (ie within a couple weeks/months/possibly year) against an already financially thin deep state could work to help drain the swamp without the legal/voting fraud repercussions that have been used in the past.
Just spit balling some game theroy here.
Very interesting. Check this:
https://ibb.co/K53JB43
My quick skim tells me that the bitches have been using a combination of three strategies on us:
I was initially surprised that this document has been made public. What I think the mil is saying here is “We know exactly what you are trying to do and how you are trying to accomplish that — YOU WILL NOT SUCCEED!”
Amazing times to be alive and bear witness to this massive global transformation!
And yet, the Navy for example, has gone "full woke" in their daily operations, recruiting, etc.
I hope it's the case, because you can't get any dumber than Austin, and you can't get any more blatantly anti-military than what is publicly known. It's almost like they are baiting Russia or China to attack us :)
Did Philips ever release that stuff he said needed two more days?
I was banned for saying “two more weeks” and here we are.
Because those comments don't get us anywhere or move us forward in any way. Anyone too stupid to see that the plan will happen on Trump Time will continue to watch from the sidelines. This moderation policy was established by Q. See sidebar. First quote:
It will ALWAYS feel like two more weeks to those who are awake.
People have difficulty making comparisons and rightly so. Everyone should not think the same. Using a sports metaphor, putting dates for the release of information is trash talking. It causes a reaction from your opponent and it causes mistakes.
Wondering also. I think it was 2 weeks, actually and I feel like that was at least 2 weeks ago. Maybe waiting for the RvW stuff to quiet down?
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IXpShUcy/x/c/4OZr1VhJRzC
Thank you. In your opinion, is this the MOAB (my words) he claimed?
No. But I still think one is coming.
Posting this here as well
4th Generation Warfare Handbook.m4b - 0.1 GB
https://files.catbox.moe/a6wbh9.m4b
Which was also Done by "SleepyDude" HERE at GA..11 Months Ago https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJZHFjfS/you-guys-really-need-to-read-the/
I never saw this. You're right. It needs reposting.
Q is the COIN
Big section on T..E Lawrence, which made me doubletake.
I read a book decades ago, which was of French origin, that said that Lawrence was a faggot and a cross-dresser (their words). Mkay.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
I'm more familiar with the saying as "a stopped clock is right twice a day", which is obviously correct for a standard 12 hour analog clock (with a possible exception involving leap-seconds).
What I would consider to be the key insight is that, if you have two clocks running at (different) constant speeds, τ, ω, then the difference between them also changes at a constant rate, |τ−ω|. It follows immediately that, if the first clock is correct and working properly, then τ=1, and the difference of the other from the correct time, t, is given by |1−ω|t.
Since clocks are periodic, if the broken clock is correct at t=0, it will also show the correct time at any t such that |1−ω|t=(12hours)×k, or t=(12hours)×k|1−ω| (for k∈Z). The period of that, T, is clearly given by T=12hours|1−ω|, and, since ω can be made as close as you choose to 1, T can be made as close to ∞ as you wish.
That also makes intuitive sense. If a clock loses or gains time very slowly - say a second per year - then it also takes a very long time for that error to be noticeable, and a much, much longer time before that error accumulates to be 12 hours.
Meanwhile, a clock that's running at a high enough speed (forward or backward) will display every time multiple times per second, including the correct time, so, at least in theory, for any short, finite time interval, δt, you can describe a clock that runs continuously at a fixed speed, is correct at some instant during the interval [t,δt) for any time t, and which is completely useless in practice.
Found the horologist. ⌚
Leave his personal life out of this... Kek!
This is a great example of, "He ain't wrong, but he ain't in 'reality'."
He found a way to be correct, but nobody else in society is thinking it or accepting it.
I equate it to my frens that are always bringing up the UCC code laws, and telling us of that one special person or "clock" that doesn't pay taxes because of legal fictions and whatever.
That's great. But for the rest of us, try that shit and end up in jail.
Everybody is always looking for loopholes, and you'll find them eventually. But just because you find them, doesn't mean society will participate.
kek, i was being goofy last night and copy-pasted that response from some math forum