Why? It's a common term in the movement. It's something newbies can understand. Comms can't be dynamic and change over time? These posts were intended for newbies. You don't see that?
I don't understand this thinking. It lacks logic. The mission and nature of comms can't change over time. You are not the primary audience anymore. Any you have tried to reach has either believed you or rejected you. Theses posts are for the newbies. They are to include them and make them feel a part of something. They are designed to be shared and can be validated with just a little digging. You are rejecting these and fighting against their intended purpose.
I noticed this and thought the same thing. The only time Q used the words "white hat" prior to now was as a response to the narrative that Mueller was a white hat.
Midterms are safe = Republicans kept the Senate. Which Q stresses the historic nature of that (midterms usually go to the other party from who won the Executive)
They are setting a trap. Trump warned them Saturday. We can do this the easy way (clean voting) or the hard way.
"We are not going to remain a free country. When you see whats happening with the FBI or with [the department of] justice, we are not going to remain a free country. Now... maybe things will happen that will free it up. But I'll tell ya, we just have to... we have to do it. We want to do it at the voter booth. And you have your chance. You can't blow your chance..."
I think it's a tossup on the elections tomorrow. 50/50 chance, could go either way. Yet a-fucking-gain. They stole the White House, more than once, they stole the midterms. Getting real tired of this shit show. Tired of the RINOs, too.
Seems like to me is they have tried to secure it as much as possible but we need to drown out any of the other kinds of cheating by making a tsunami of votes tomorrow so they lose everything.
They are going to try to cheat as much as they can, they know its there last shot.
Bring on tomorrow we will vote them out of existence, we have already kicked in the door to their "safespace" at twitter and slapped them in the face with the big dick of freedom kek
This is the same Q team since 2017. Why? If it was not then Trump team would distance themselves. The better question is - who exactly posts now.
The plan is old - whatever it is. And it includes possibility of hostile force taking control over Q account as it holds massive amount of power - as it was planned.
Lots of shills out. Not surprising now that real Q has returned. Want proof? Why would Mike Rothschild want people to think that this Q was Jim Watkins? Do you attack your friends or your enemies? Make sure you vote. Tell all your friends to vote. We will deal with the fallout after.
For what it's worth, although Q has never used the term 'White Hats' in any other drop, there are a couple of drops in response to posts containing 'Black Hats'.
It’s hard to believe that after all these years, people haven’t learned the simple truth that it doesn’t matter who shared the information; it only matters if the information is true or false, and whether it can be utilized to enhance the life of the person receiving it.
People’s insatiable need to attach to personalities (including the “personality” of an anonymous poster) is a terrible, nearly debilitating crutch.
That font tho.
thicc & curvy
How I like my gravy and biscuits!
Is that what the kids are calling zoftic women these dayz?
Lol I couldn't resist!
What's wrong with comic sans-serif?
I kek'd at that... should have added the /s before.
Posted in Qrayons
This font gave me cancer.
Q saying white hats is a red flag. It's some chuckle fuck pretender.
Why? https://qanon.pub/?q=white%20hat
These new Qs smell off
I take all of them with a grain of salt, anon. I can neither prove nor disprove them. But i tell you, i've seen a heck of a lot of coincidences.
Someone doesn't know basic cybersecurity vocab from 20+ years ago. The most apt term when describing "cybersecurity teams".
Such assumptions
Why? It's a common term in the movement. It's something newbies can understand. Comms can't be dynamic and change over time? These posts were intended for newbies. You don't see that?
Just a rehash of stuff from years ago. Seems this Q has no new insights after 2 years of fascist crap?
Like listening to an album’s B side
I don't understand this thinking. It lacks logic. The mission and nature of comms can't change over time. You are not the primary audience anymore. Any you have tried to reach has either believed you or rejected you. Theses posts are for the newbies. They are to include them and make them feel a part of something. They are designed to be shared and can be validated with just a little digging. You are rejecting these and fighting against their intended purpose.
You assume that an enemy actor wouldn't be able to write 20 lines of Q that "reads like the original Q"
You assume Q is a single author. Q post 15 is commonly decoded to be written by Saudi Arabian Military/Patriots
Q has never used the term "White hats", ever.
https://qalerts.app/?n=3312
I noticed this and thought the same thing. The only time Q used the words "white hat" prior to now was as a response to the narrative that Mueller was a white hat.
u/#q3312
It strikes me as being off. Operators, patriots or any other term would have seemed more the norm.
Also in the world of cyber security, which is something this post is talking about, there are black Hats, and white hats. Its a common term.
Almost, though.
u/#q51
u/#Nov5
WIGGA WIGGA!!!
What is the point of disinformation? Can it make enemies make mistakes?
2018 Midterms = Senate was the Target
Midterms are safe = Republicans kept the Senate. Which Q stresses the historic nature of that (midterms usually go to the other party from who won the Executive)
This makes sense.
Q preparing us for a letdown?
Certainly has that feel doesn’t it?!?!?
They are setting a trap. Trump warned them Saturday. We can do this the easy way (clean voting) or the hard way.
This aligns with Q’s latest posts.
WWG1WGA!!!
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/17728819.html#17728969
https://qanon.pub/
https://qalerts.app/
REMEMBER: RESEARCH BOARD . PRO-Q COMMUNITY. CIVIL
I think it's a tossup on the elections tomorrow. 50/50 chance, could go either way. Yet a-fucking-gain. They stole the White House, more than once, they stole the midterms. Getting real tired of this shit show. Tired of the RINOs, too.
Trip was compromised. This is unlikely to actually be Q as supposedly Q ia now ZDQ and isnt relying on trip codes.
Fake
and gay?
This board is getting slammed by trolls, bots & swamp reeeees
Seems like to me is they have tried to secure it as much as possible but we need to drown out any of the other kinds of cheating by making a tsunami of votes tomorrow so they lose everything. They are going to try to cheat as much as they can, they know its there last shot.
Bring on tomorrow we will vote them out of existence, we have already kicked in the door to their "safespace" at twitter and slapped them in the face with the big dick of freedom kek
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IqslXQdq/due-to-8kun-admin-wankery-q-has-/c/
This is the same Q team since 2017. Why? If it was not then Trump team would distance themselves. The better question is - who exactly posts now.
The plan is old - whatever it is. And it includes possibility of hostile force taking control over Q account as it holds massive amount of power - as it was planned.
Lots of shills out. Not surprising now that real Q has returned. Want proof? Why would Mike Rothschild want people to think that this Q was Jim Watkins? Do you attack your friends or your enemies? Make sure you vote. Tell all your friends to vote. We will deal with the fallout after.
This is the way
National Guard - Cybersecurity:
https://www.nationalguard.com/careers/cyber
Read the description & requirements. Compare & see how this applies to now.
what are those problems that remain?
For what it's worth, although Q has never used the term 'White Hats' in any other drop, there are a couple of drops in response to posts containing 'Black Hats'.
Correct. This is a first.
White Hat was also a first, some might even say the first compared to White Hats https://qanon.pub/?q=white%20hat
We can't find the cheating unless the cheating can be detected. It can't be detected unless we vote.
I believe these are the correct answers to these important questions:
To appear as if they are monitoring the election
Biden/Govenors, CISA backed
To protect those trying to steal the election and prevent whitehat interference
No
No
Safe from republicans 'stealing' the election
Setting the stage to claim that republicans stole the election
Watch carefully.
White hats have secured many systems, but problems still remain.
You have all the tools you need.
Vote.
Q
I was afraid we wouldn’t be able to trust the Nasty Gals who were surged.
Something seems different about Q, but that font...
The font is irrelevant. Vote.
IF someone had control of the Q trip, they could destroy Q credibility. Why aren't they doing that? How much would they get paid to do that? A LOT.
And there's a 1.9 billion Powerball game tomorrow night. Someone is going to get a payoff.
Zelensky has entered the chat
Looooooooooool
kek
Hope it's me!!!
I really don’t care.
It’s hard to believe that after all these years, people haven’t learned the simple truth that it doesn’t matter who shared the information; it only matters if the information is true or false, and whether it can be utilized to enhance the life of the person receiving it.
People’s insatiable need to attach to personalities (including the “personality” of an anonymous poster) is a terrible, nearly debilitating crutch.
Happy Election Day tomorrow, everyone!