Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

157
Plot Twist? Trump' Attorney and not Trump asked to surrender? Can this statement be read as that Mr. Trump's Attorney (Cohen?) has been asked to surrender and not Trump? What if Trump's Attorney is the one who has been indicted? Just random thought!! Let's see what happens!! (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 3 years ago by mnpsna 3 years ago by mnpsna +157 / -0
48 comments download share
48 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (48)
sorted by:
▲ 19 ▼
– JohnCoctoston 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

WTF is a STATEMENT ATTRIBUTABLE TO A SPOKESPERSON :P

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– MarkusCincinnatus 18 points 3 years ago +18 / -0

You’re right that if you backtrack from the pronoun “his”, the most recent noun is “attorney”. This is a spokesperson’s statement rather than a court order so perhaps there is a higher tolerance for imprecise language. We do know for sure what the statement would’ve meant if it had said ‘Mr. Trump’s surrender’ instead of “his surrender”.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– sueanon2017 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

yes, Q is tricky with grammar, etc, so think you're on the right track. And it's a good reminder that we have to read everything like this. it's tedious, but will help anons.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– BadMamaJama 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Isn't Cohen still on house arrest from his first conviction about taxi cab medallions or some such thing?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– PeaceAndLovePatriot 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Huh?

Sos on this?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BadMamaJama 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I am wrong - he finished his 3 year prison sentence (last year on house arrest due to covid) in 2021 and is now 3 years supervised.Cohen sentence info

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MoniQuesmith303 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

We contacted Mr. Trump's attorney to coordinate Mr. Trump's surrender. No. The grammar would be terrible. 🤣

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– PeaceAndLovePatriot 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Actually, the way you phrased it is correct. That's how you properly state it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– special1ntere5t 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Why not just say his clients surrender? Would be clear that way

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MarkusCincinnatus 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Grammar would be fine, the style is just repetitive. At this point with all the drama and confusion over pronouns, it’s tempting not to use them and just use the nouns all the time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DeathRayDesigner 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

"...we contacted his attorney to coordinate Mr. Trump's surrender..."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MarkusCincinnatus 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Maybe you should be the spokesperson

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DeathRayDesigner 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I've just done an awful lot of writing in my time. Hmm. Not quite the same thing as doing a lot of time...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– HardWorkinPatriot 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Could be a sting for fake media. They push that Trump was indicted when really it was his attorney? Only time will tell.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– mnpsna [S] 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Yes that is what it looks to be. The more I read this statement, the more it seems to me that Trump's attorney has been indicted!! We will have to wait for things to unfold!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Greato 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Yeah but if Cohen was the one being indicted, why even mention “Mr. Trump?”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– mnpsna [S] 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

What if the complaint was filed by Trump himself against his attorney and Trump was never under investigation in this matter?

White hats in control?

Everyone now thinks that Trump has been indicted and he has gained so much support, even more than what happened after the Mar-a-Lago raid!! Also, the MSM will be exposed like never before!!

Let's wait and watch!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– HardWorkinPatriot 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I like the way you think. That would be Trump's style! 4D chess

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– PeaceAndLovePatriot 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Doubtful. They would simply claim their info was wrong. And blame the spokesperson.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Light1SingleCandle 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

The anonymous spokesperson.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– mnpsna [S] 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

u/#q4

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MagaPrideParade 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Yea he can't be indicted or arrested, this is all some big show. If he is actually arrested it means Q was wrong, and Q isn't going to be wrong.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– TheGreatPumpkin 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

April fools mother truckers😅😂🤣😁😆😄🙃

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Magpi 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

exactly this!! two days ahead of schedule

comfy af

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TheGreatPumpkin 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Man the proof of Q is just right there. I saw this coming when the countdown started at 14. No coincidence. It’s right in our face. This also caused the trannys to cancel their day of violence. Q said, “ no civil war no riots clean and swift Potus 100% insulated.” Waiting for the tweet! Will it come tomorrow? Me thinks soon

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Sadness 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

good catch.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Trumpamania2020 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

This is what happens when education is deprioritized.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Island_Photo 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Supreme Court, meaning NY Supreme Court? whixh is not the highest court in NY....

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– mnpsna [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Yes even the use of the word Supreme Court is very strange. This statement has some hidden meaning for sure which will only get clear once the indictment is unsealed!!

Remember Q#3716 and Q#3717. Let's see what happens!!

u/#q3716

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Magpi 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Maybe it was SC and they thought that meant Supreme Court, rather than Special Counsel. It's a stretch, I know, but then again so is this statement from a "spokesperson."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

What exactly do we need to remember about Ghislaine Maxwell and Kevin Klinesmith?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Madrashro 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The arraignment and indictment would be the purview of the Supreme Court in the NY state Court System, which is actually the trial-level court (confusingly). The appellate level courts are called the “Supreme Court, Appellate Division”, and the highest court, called the Supreme Court in every other state, is called the “Court of Appeals.”

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– dty6 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Very nice!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– PeaceAndLovePatriot 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Your correct about how this is worded.

When I worked in law enforcement and wrote reports, wording it like this would have got my report kicked back.

One must be specific about who "he" or "she" is.

Matter of fact, you can't even really use those terms for the most part. You have to replace he/she with the name, or use other shorthand terms that are explained earlier in the report, like "V" for victim, etc

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– PeaceAndLovePatriot 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

So basically, the spokesperson should have known this, if they were an attorney or LEO.

If they weren't (idk cause I didn't hear this), then they likely wouldn't have know this, plus they are illiterate.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CQVFEFE 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Pronoun "his" refers to Trump

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– mnpsna [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

There seems to be multiple issues with this statement:

  1. "Statement attributable to a spokesperson"- who uses such kind of language?
  2. "his" refers to Trump or his attorney?
  3. "Supreme Court"- Which court has issued the indictment?
  4. "Guidance will be provided when the arraignment date is selected"- what guidance?

Considering the high stakes involved, I feel that the DA must have read this statement ten times, if not more, before releasing it to everyone!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– JackieDaytona74 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It's just poor grammar.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– mnpsna [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

IMO, for the statement to reflect Trump's indictment, it should have been "we contacted Mr. Trump's attorney to coordinate his clients surrender"!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– JackieDaytona74 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

client's.

Love, The Grammar Police

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– mnpsna [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

IMO, for the statement to reflect Trump's indictment, it should have been "we contacted Mr. Trump's attorney to coordinate his clients surrender"!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 2Aadherent 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Ok y'all, may have not had enough coffee yet but, where did OP get this " Statement Attributable To A Spokesperson" from?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– mnpsna [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

https://twitter.com/ManhattanDA/status/1641579988360019968

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 2Aadherent 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Thank you so much! Until I'm on the second gallon of coffee, I'm kinda out of it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GGRockz 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

If I were Trump I would hold my head high and walk right in and let the show begin.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– mnpsna [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The funny thing is that this is one of those unique cases where Trump's attorney(or former) is personally involved and therefore, this statement can be interpreted in both ways!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Cheesecakecrush 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Don't forget these people are pretty dumb. It would be hilarious if they WERE going after his attorney and not Trump himself, but I seriously doubt thats the case purely because they want to imprison Trump under anything they possibly can, and this stupid horseshit is all they've got.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– JessWithTheMess 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Not getting that at all from this statement but I hope you’re right.

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy