You're misunderstanding. They didn't withdraw these from the market because they didn't work nor because they're killing people. They withdrew these from the market so that the only thing available on the market is the bivalent product which has the original wild type strain AND the mRNA for the Omicron BA.4/5 spike protein. You're still getting a half dose of the original with the new product. The other half is that spike protein they tested on 8 mice and declared good to go.
Far too many people are getting this wrong. FDA is admitting nothing here. They're pushing the agenda forward.
But the bivalent vaccine is still authorized. The question should be that since the emergency is over how do any of these death shots continue to have EUA? None of them are the formally approved Corminarty.
Monovalent vs Bivalent. They confuse us with the terminology and the dosage factor. That's how they continue to talk out of both sides of their mouth.
But look at the comments. People are no longer being fooled. We may still run into the rabid masker or jabber, but many have finally broken free of the spell. Still a lot of work to do, but make no mistake frens, WE are seeing a GREAT AWAKENING taking place before our eyes.
Keep trusting the LORD, for HE will guide us to victory.
Exactly. The bivalent contains the monovalent and the
This action includes authorizing the current bivalent vaccines (original and omicron BA.4/BA.5 strains) to be used for all doses administered to individuals 6 months of age and older, including for an additional dose or doses for certain populations.
It looks like the bivalent ones will still be used. But aren't they under the EUA even though there is no "emergency"? This whole thing is confusing! I wish they would just stop with this madness.
If I remember their word garbage correctly, the "boosters" are the "bivalent". I've already had (according to EUA test), the "Omicron covid", not the sickest I have ever been, and I have Natural Immunity now, so why FDA do I need the "shot"?
Omicron is so last year! I think they are claiming that we need "protection" from each new variant. I think we need protection from the WHO, CDC, NIH, FDA, etc.
The bivalent is omicron and delta. They also discuss a June meeting where any changes will be determined by what they believe will be the next variant. So look for a new vaccine for the next variant of concern which atm is a subvariant of omicron. I cant remember what they are calling it off the top of my head.
They are using the flu shot model where each year there will be a new vaccine to combat that years variants of concern.
Previously, you had the option of up to 4 monovalent products, all built to simulate the spike protein of the original wild type virus from 2000. It's obviously not circulating anymore. We've had delta and omicron, and several hundred subvariants since then. Only 1 of the monovalent products remains, the Novavax traditional protein-type vaccine. Novavax is currently in the final phases of testing a bivalent replacement.
Now, as of today's announcement, you may ONLY get the bivalent products (with the 1 exception, and good luck finding anyone who stocks it). They still contain a half dose of the original spike protein and a half dose of the spike protein from the Omicron BA.4/5 variants (also no longer circulating). The CDC's vaccine schedule now says you have to have the bivalents. So if you've got a kid who goes to a public school just about anywhere in this country, now they have to have the bivalents.
They're moving the agenda forward. It's not the victory people on this board think it is. Leftists don't back down. They double down and push forward.
For treatment, you still have Pfizer's Paxlovid and remdesivir. They might have a new monoclonal antibody as well, but I'm not certain. At this point, it's a nightmare to keep up with these because they make a new, completely unpronounceable one with every new variant, then when the virus inevitably mutates, they yank them off the market as fast as they added them.
Pfizer (makers of Paxlovid and the Comirnaty bivalent), Moderna (makers of Spikevax bivalent), Merck (makers of molnupravir), etc are never EVER going to allow ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine to get favorable attention from FDA or CDC. Regulatory capture costs a fortune and they are darn well going to get a ROI for their lobbying dollars.
Translation: they finally finished selling out of the billions of doses they had stockpiled. Anyone with basic understanding knows that this vaccine was useless 2 years ago if at all. They’ve been giving the same vaxx while letting everyone know the virus has mutated numerous times
Raise your hand if you knew this would happen, 2 years ago.
You're misunderstanding. They didn't withdraw these from the market because they didn't work nor because they're killing people. They withdrew these from the market so that the only thing available on the market is the bivalent product which has the original wild type strain AND the mRNA for the Omicron BA.4/5 spike protein. You're still getting a half dose of the original with the new product. The other half is that spike protein they tested on 8 mice and declared good to go.
Far too many people are getting this wrong. FDA is admitting nothing here. They're pushing the agenda forward.
Not so fast. Nothing has really changed.
But the bivalent vaccine is still authorized. The question should be that since the emergency is over how do any of these death shots continue to have EUA? None of them are the formally approved Corminarty.
It's hard to raise my hand and type at the same time.
Hunt and peck
LORD KEK DECREES IT SO.
IT IS WRITTEN.
Praise kek
I'm a tad confused. They're no longer authorized but the FDA updated the vaccination schedule for it at the same time? Here's the most recent news release dated today:
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-changes-simplify-use-bivalent-mrna-covid-19-vaccines
Could it be that monovalants are out and bivalents are in? The ones that cover many or all variants?
OK that makes sense. So they're still jabbing people even though the "emergency" is over but only using the bivalent jabs. So confusing! Thanks!
This is exactly what they said. There was a series of tweets, and this was one of them.
https://twitter.com/US_FDA/status/1648315672055652354
Actually it's not that the monovalents are out, it's that they became part of the bivalent:
https://twitter.com/US_FDA/status/1648315662559748096
Every comment under that first twitter link is from unvaxxed telling them heck no in their own ways. Kek!
Are bivalents tested and fully approved? If not, how can they justify this?
Yeah. I don't know whats going on.
Another BOOM?
Monovalent vs Bivalent. They confuse us with the terminology and the dosage factor. That's how they continue to talk out of both sides of their mouth.
But look at the comments. People are no longer being fooled. We may still run into the rabid masker or jabber, but many have finally broken free of the spell. Still a lot of work to do, but make no mistake frens, WE are seeing a GREAT AWAKENING taking place before our eyes.
Keep trusting the LORD, for HE will guide us to victory.
Stop noticing so much and just roll up your sleeve
Exactly. The bivalent contains the monovalent and the
"Original" meaning the monovalent.
https://twitter.com/US_FDA/status/1648315662559748096
Didn't they use two different formulas?
It looks like the bivalent ones will still be used. But aren't they under the EUA even though there is no "emergency"? This whole thing is confusing! I wish they would just stop with this madness.
If I remember their word garbage correctly, the "boosters" are the "bivalent". I've already had (according to EUA test), the "Omicron covid", not the sickest I have ever been, and I have Natural Immunity now, so why FDA do I need the "shot"?
Omicron is so last year! I think they are claiming that we need "protection" from each new variant. I think we need protection from the WHO, CDC, NIH, FDA, etc.
The bivalent is omicron and delta. They also discuss a June meeting where any changes will be determined by what they believe will be the next variant. So look for a new vaccine for the next variant of concern which atm is a subvariant of omicron. I cant remember what they are calling it off the top of my head.
They are using the flu shot model where each year there will be a new vaccine to combat that years variants of concern.
Yes. They're moving the agenda forward.
Previously, you had the option of up to 4 monovalent products, all built to simulate the spike protein of the original wild type virus from 2000. It's obviously not circulating anymore. We've had delta and omicron, and several hundred subvariants since then. Only 1 of the monovalent products remains, the Novavax traditional protein-type vaccine. Novavax is currently in the final phases of testing a bivalent replacement.
Now, as of today's announcement, you may ONLY get the bivalent products (with the 1 exception, and good luck finding anyone who stocks it). They still contain a half dose of the original spike protein and a half dose of the spike protein from the Omicron BA.4/5 variants (also no longer circulating). The CDC's vaccine schedule now says you have to have the bivalents. So if you've got a kid who goes to a public school just about anywhere in this country, now they have to have the bivalents.
They're moving the agenda forward. It's not the victory people on this board think it is. Leftists don't back down. They double down and push forward.
The bivalent vaccines are still in play :(
Today the FDA issued a new schedule for when to get another booster.
Vaccines are for prevention.
For treatment, you still have Pfizer's Paxlovid and remdesivir. They might have a new monoclonal antibody as well, but I'm not certain. At this point, it's a nightmare to keep up with these because they make a new, completely unpronounceable one with every new variant, then when the virus inevitably mutates, they yank them off the market as fast as they added them.
Pfizer (makers of Paxlovid and the Comirnaty bivalent), Moderna (makers of Spikevax bivalent), Merck (makers of molnupravir), etc are never EVER going to allow ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine to get favorable attention from FDA or CDC. Regulatory capture costs a fortune and they are darn well going to get a ROI for their lobbying dollars.
They moved to food supply introduction.
Looks to me, they are just changing the name to confuse people! 🙄
The "emergency" was.over like 2 years ago whys it taken so long to officially end ffs
My doctor is still pressuring me to get boosters. I refuse. I know doctors get paid for their patients getting jabbed. I’ve read that on this site.
You need to drop that POS and look elsewhere.
Translation: they finally finished selling out of the billions of doses they had stockpiled. Anyone with basic understanding knows that this vaccine was useless 2 years ago if at all. They’ve been giving the same vaxx while letting everyone know the virus has mutated numerous times
That's because they are using bivalent for everything now
But they want to give you the biavlent instead.
TIL they're just gonna keep sterilizing and slaughtering babies with poison
CONTEXT. please do not post think kinds of things w/o properly checking the full information.
So they remove the old formula to roll out the trivalent vaccines, right?