From the date the fire on Maui was made public I noticed an increase in professional opinions here, regarding the events. Many new accounts and not so new accounts came out in full force giving cookie cutter explanations for what happened, including some who claim to have worked on DEW. Or saying that lasers couldn’t be the cause of the fire, while also ignoring that visible lasers are not the only form of DEW capability. Some use lasers, some use microwaves, some use gamaray, some use pressure waves/sound, some use X-rays.. but they all focused in on lasers and why there was no way it could have been that. Reminds me of the guy in the black shirt doing that interview on the street shortly after the World Trade Center collapse, dude had the entire scripted story ready to go while people where still trying to make sense of what happened.
Comments (88)
sorted by:
Maui and 9/11 use the same dustification tech. The houses are gone, no washing machines, no corrugated iron, nothing but white ash. Watch these three parts: https://video.icic.law/w/6vAGH5NPBc9UcC9RKw4ik7 Google 'house burnt' images and look at the difference in damage a conventional fire causes. The difference is literally black and white.
It's painfully obvious that there is controlled opposition and gate-keepers everywhere within the truther/awakening community or whatever else you want to call it. The powers that be no longer give a damn if we believe that the government is evil and are conspiring to kill us but they sure as hell don't want us to realize the level of black technology that exists and has been monopolized by malevolent forces. They know full well the implications this would have on all of humanity should this kind of technology become common knowledge.
I for one am sick and fucking tired of people trying to tell me what I am and am not permitted to question and investigate lest I be called a conspiracy theorist, a moron, crazy and whatever else. I've been seeing this bullshit even on this board and I think it's time truth seekers start excising this out of our groups.
Well many of the people you’re tired of are likely the infiltrators themselves…people don’t like some of the names the MG show folks are asking questions about but they have some very interesting questions about some people who are supposed to be untouchable. This jives with my experience when our family dealt with some rich pedophiles…everything is fine until you draw a boundary, then you find out who’s who real fast.
"Well many of the people you’re tired of are likely the infiltrators themselves…"
I know, that was my point.
"people don’t like some of the names the MG show folks are asking questions about but they have some very interesting questions about some people who are supposed to be untouchable."
I haven't watched the MG show much, do you have a link? I'm curious to get caught up on some of this.
Edit: I found their channel, it already seems quite promising.
If I were the deep state, I would infiltrate this site. And I think they have.
^^^
Look up "torsion field weapons " and a lot of this shit suddenly makes sense
Great information, fren.
Listen to an interview with Trump shortly after the 9/11. “These buildings were rock solid”.
The DEW energy couldn’t go through so many layers (floors).
Nanotermite - exolosive that destroys the steel. This theory is already years old and it seems to explain 9/11 very well.
Maui - yes, DEW, “dustification” tech.
EXACTLY
I was at a conference with the dude in the black shirt, he was one of the speakers, by the way, he had on a black shirt and pants just like on 9-11, huh what a coincidence. I was a first responder on 9-11 many of the alphabet agencies told us that smoke won't hurt you, these are the same 3 letter alphabet agencies that promoted the jab vax
Don’t forget these are the same clowns that lie about Trump daily.
But we countered with an arborist who helped us see the absurdity of the claims by describing the flammability of the trees that were left standing right next to a car that had melted glass and rivers of aluminum. The fence post where the only thing that burned was the nails.
Place a pice of wood in the microwave and see if it burns…. Now place a nail or aluminum foil…. Warning ⚠️ don’t try this without any safety precautions and in a safe environment.
Another good example:
The contrast between the steel belted tires (burned & disintegrated down to the steel wires) versus the nylon / polyester reinforced tires (completely intact unburned) points to microwaves in my mind.
One of them here dangles it in his name
Dangles it in his name and conveniently shows up in threads where hidden high technology is being discussed to tell everyone how silly/dumb they are for believing those things…
Yeah... It's glowie as hell. I thought I was the only one that noticed...
Where'd he go
Yep, and the names check out. It was pretty obvious wasn’t it. I knew we were trying to be railroaded when one user claimed Maui doesn’t have a Dew center even though it can be confirmed nd verified from multiple govt sources and interviews…
Several mods have seen this post and left it up so far.
We are not glowies, we don't want the discussion to be centred around just DEWs they suck the oxygen from other discussion.
That works for me.
Considering the attitude the mods have to him, it's pretty funny. They will laugh their ass off at this accusation.
I see behind the scenes and I see mods who believe in different strategies in redpilling, but I don't see any comped mods.
I've been doing it a while now. I believe mods would expose and throw out a traitor in our midst. We see each other's actions.
Well, what I mean is that if a mod is being effective, and they can justify their decisions, then they might conceivably be a spy, but they aren't a functional glowie.
We discuss and argue things out on a daily basis and losing the argument means you really have to reverse your decision. We discuss and review all areas including how to handle posts like this one which, as you can see, is causing ripples for us.
You're saying because Mike Rothschild is afraid of GAW, that means GAW must be DS-controlled?
That makes zero sense.
Read the post again and maybe it will make sense.
No, it does not make sense even after reading the few sentences you call a "post."
You said this
which makes no sense at all. Why would Mikey be trying to take down GAW if he already had it controlled?
Look at Alex Jones, do you know how controlled opposition works? What about counter intelligence? When the asset no longer serves a purpose they either leave, or attempt to take down the entity.. No doubt in my mind Mikey has a .win account. Also no doubt in my mind there are feds with .win accounts. It is simply a logical assessment of surveillance and intelligence operations.
Well I had a 48-hour ban for putting the word 'evil' in my title. Go figure.
how can you tell a glowie?
I remember that post. Good job.
Oh...You mean like engineers that thump their chests like "expert" dbags and you'll always be wrong no matter what you say, because they've got the username and pocket protector to prove their credentials? You mean, like that?
One thing I've learned since the net became a thing...
As soon as anyone lists their credentials or qualifications - they're pretty much done.
"Because I said so" or "I've got a degree in..." doesn't mean shit anymore. You're all equally moronic. Pay your loans back yet, genius? Get on that after you're done making my sandwich.
Yeah generally engineers know how what they know about works and can't imagine there's something beyond that.
I'm not an engineer, but I am a scientist, so what I say should be accepted without question. And I say the DEW is cool and all, but it's soo much simpler and cheaper to do it with some gasoline and a whole lotta CGI. Then nail up a fence so nobody can see behind the curtain.
Do not question the science!
Azazel. Don’t you have better things to do.
Are you questioning the Science?
PS. Thanks for the Azazel tip. Apparently I got some reading to do, but fallen angel is a bit lofty for me. Woulda hada been an Angel at some point before the fall. I think I'd remember that.
An angel is just a messenger
By the way I didn’t down vote ya.
No problem. I usually take the down votes as a measure of success. I managed to stir the pot, and that's an important step if you want a tasty stew.
Exactly that. I found greater respect for Mike Lindell when he called out the attorney at his deposition..........."You're just some two-bit ambulance chaser."
I love to speak truth to power for the look on their faces if nothing else.
I think these shills gets accounts and then build their post count talking to each other on older posts....
Yes that would be very easy to do. I wouldn’t put it past them to have 6-10 accounts to give themselves upvotes or make it seem like others agree with them. Kinda like the Twitter issue with bots helping them gain popularity.
I haven't noticed a surge in people claiming to be DEW experts.
I have noticed a surge of low-effort, low-info posts that claim DEWs were used on Maui but offer no real evidence.
Anons would be wise to consider the possibility that the Maui / DEW theory was started by the DS to obfuscate the truth.
A whole bunch of laser and combustion experts suddenly appeared
Is that sort of like a wild pikachu appearing?
A wild shill has appeared lmaooooo
hah awesome!
Or a wild snorlax blocking the roadway, forcing you to take a alt route ;)
I'm no expert but you can learn tons about lasers and their capabilities on youtube
Yup. Instinct tells me there was a reason for that.
My question is, why would they not want us to know DEWs caused it? There was obviously many things that went wrong that day that showed it was a setup. Sirens not going off, water was turned off, chief of police was the same one who lead the LV massacre.. etc.
Whether it was a DEW or arson doesn't matter IMO. It was a deliberate burning of Lahaina (arson).
At Trump's rally last Friday, he started talking about Biden as his economic policies in the theme of fire. He even said "It's economic arson". Then during that same topic he brings up "Not sending money to Maui." Pretty obvious comms.
My only explanation for them coming here to say it's not a DEW is to cause division and fighting in order to distract us from focusing on other things about the fire. However, they are wasting their time on a forum like this. They know we are too awake, it's a lost cause for them. Now, PDW on the other hand is compromised. I remember seeing so many comments before J6 telling people to bring guns to D.C. They were the top voted comments too.
I agree, same basic shit that happened on 9/11. Get shills to make claims about missiles and holograms, while the rest of the public just thinks it's insane
Actually, the DEW angle explains the anomalies with this "wildfire".
But discussing it can result in punitive action.
I noticed there is always some asshole going 'im an x with x experience and i tell u x. trust me bro" in the comments sections everywhere. And it did get more intense, not just here but on the general internet. I think AI allows creating bots with personalities like that easier than before.
I remember watching a video that seem like it was filmed in the 1950s of the capabilities of 5g boiling water.
The Government will never lie.
When rhe hell ard you going to wake up?
Maybe I’ll finally get it after I fully vaxed and boosted.
You probably already are.
Please don't answer and waste my time.
I am far from a troll an you new account.
That’s low effort. But GG
my only counterpoint is that DEW (are we already abbreviating this? life comes at you fast, lol) is fire itself. Once a fire starts, it's pretty much a matter of wind direction/speed and source of fuel.
Not saying it's not DEW, mind you, just saying where it goes after it starts is pretty much up to natural forces
Yes, and we also know that wind turbines are capable of resting high winds and generate electricity. Alternating current generation works both ways. What can generate can also be made to spin and act as a motor. Who knows if the high winds was wind turbines spinning to make wind instead of harvesting it for power. Not saying this is what happened, but not impossible either. Considering the hurricane was hundreds of miles away and the intensity of the wind, highly suspicious.
possible, but highly implausible. While it's technically possible to run a generator backwards by applying power to it, or use a motor as a generator by applying mechanical force to it, both are highly inefficient when used in the opposite direction of their intended purpose.
not to mention the blades arent really made for that purpose. If you ever look at the blades on a bladed fan they're almost always fairly chunky, designed to scoop up as much air as possible and move it forward.
The blades on a windmill seem to be just about the opposite (when accounting for scale), aerodynamic surfaces that are almost delicate looking, designed to be pushed by the wind rather than to push the wind.
you also have to keep in mind that most of the time, windmills don't move very fast, unless the winds themselves are pretty impressive, so running them in reverse to produce anything like hurricane-force winds would very likely signal the death of the generator pretty quickly, assuming the gearbox itself didn't fail from being run backwards from its intended use.
again, not impossible, just highly unlikely.
This is where I listen to the experts
We all exercise free will to be influenced by who or what ever we chose.
Yup.......then there's attraction
Yup. Couple good ones on there for sure. See how they foment division and everyone quickly begins to fight each other instead of finding the solution? Classic example agitators. Reminds me of the J6 feds.
In using the term "professional opinions" here, are you suggesting there are verified people here getting paid? Or are you simply complementing the polemic of the many posts on the subject?
I don't believe anyone is really debating the existence and the use of DEWs in Lahaina, Maui or previously. In fact, I believe they were most likely used on 9-11. Dr. Judy Wood provides the question in her book, "Where Did The Towers Go?" And photographic evidence that seems not explainable by existing well-known technologies.
The problem with leading with the DEW narrative is that as long as the government has a monopoly on the 'official' narrative, it's going to be a tremendous mountain to climb and overcome in order for the general public to accept it. Not only is this a large obstacle to overcome, but it tends to distract from the most poignant and pressing issue. That is, the growing cover-up itself. "Where are the missing children?" Why is everything locked down? Why is a curtain being constructed around the burned out areas? Why is a no-fly zone imposed? Why is there no cell phone use? Why is there a restriction area declaration in Lahaina? It appears instead of gathering other community help, this place has become very secretive and they are bringing in foreign help. The following are the obvious things the public can easily acknowledge. So far, we have learned:
Fire prevention practices throughout the Lahaina area were purposely neglected and previously abandoned.
There appears to be evidence that fires in Maui were purposely set.
The water was turned off.
No fire fighting units were dispatched to prevent the fires from descending into the city.
The roads were blocked by the police preventing people from escaping in their vehicles when the conflagration rapidly approached.
Over a thousand people died as a result.
The cover-up has become blatantly obvious.
In any criminal case, these are questions that lead us to those people responsible. Interrogating them help in determining the masterminds behind it all. Regarding the DEW narraitive, history provides us with many examples of the government's mastery of using 'plausible deniability'. There are so many examples, It would take paragraphs and even pages to list them. I will provide a relating example though. We can look no further than Dr, Judy Wood and how she was discredited and made to appear like a nutcase. Here's one example published by Cambridge University Press using Judy Wood as psychological case:
I have no doubt, the DEW argument is real. I even asked whether the cell towers in Lahaina could have been weaponized for this to occur. However, this is only a hypothesis based on zero facts. The growing 'cover-up' is prima facie evidence that the general public can easily see. Focusing on this will eventually lead us to the 'how' argument though. It is said,'The cover-up becomes the bigger crime', and we have this benefit for the general public to see. With the Dr. Judy Wood example above, another web page viciously discredit's her by,
Even this critique asks the most important question, Who is responsible for the crime? The 'how' doesn't directly get us there and just like in the past, the enemy will use 'conspiracy theory' narrative to discredit and derail the public's demand of who is responsible.
I think you are right here when you say find out who and not how. When we know who, the how is easy to uncover. The problem is who is going to find out who is responsible… and if that happens, who is going to hold those responsible accountable… how do you prosecute the government if the government was responsible? This is the same reason we still don’t have justice for the many attacks on the American people on behalf of the DC government. What is left to do? Armed rebellion? It would have to start out in the states that do have weapons and the citizens are armed, then spread to other areas like a liberation. Our military stands by and lets it happen… this is why Q white hats can do limited amounts of counter op. The future is in our hands, not some outside salvation. We are responsible for our own enslavement, and we will be responsible for our own liberation.
I don't know if you have seen any of the Lahaina citizens speaking in front of the Lahainan city council, but I've seen and listened to some really revealing things. These people in Lahaina are livid and are exposing these culprits in public meetings. This^ is only the beginning. As more people become informed, the more the demands will be called for for these people to be removed from their positions. Lawsuits will prevail. With lawsuits are motions for discovery.
You have a very poignant question though. It is always difficult to get answers from the very criminals running the government. Exposure and increasing the pressure will cause cracks in their alibi, and these cracks will be hopefully exploited. All for them need to be exposed. It wouldn't surprise me that in Lahaina, these people will not be able to walk on the streets.
Definition of an expert
"Expert" : noun ex·pert ˈek-ˌspərt
An ex- is a has-been
A spurt is a drip under pressure
🤦♂️
The thing is, it takes being an actual expert on any subject to fully realize what bs being an expert really is!
That's because you're wise enough to know you're "pretty good" that you don't know everything.
Indeed. This is very insightful observation.
a person with a high level of knowledge or skill relating to a particular subject or activity: a gardening/medical expert My mother is an expert at dress-making (= she does it very well).
🤦♂️