I actually had two instances in the last two weeks that I was happy to witness.
I went to pay at rite aid and there was a gentleman lingering as if he was in line but not really. I gestured questioningly. I don't remember his exact words but his response was like 'Go ahead. I have all the time in the world, as I stand here thinking about the new world order'.
Then I was in line to pay for some meat at the grocery store. The cashier accidentally rung up my package for the lady in front of me. The lady made some comment about how she would not cook raw meat (she was buying a lot of processed food). So I said, pretty soon none of us will be, we'll be eating the bugs if they have their way. Of course, as I said this, I looked around to see people's faces and their responses. As I always do. Except this time, the guy behind me started shaking his head yes, in agreement. So I continued. ....the world economic forum, davos Bilderberg.... They all want us dead. And left it at that.
I've never gotten positive responses like that before. I usually just get strange looks. I was pleased.
I've discovered that one of the check out women at the local grocery store has an idea of what's really going on since I overheard her conversation last week.
This week I asked her "Why do so many coworkers wear masks?". She said "They were casualties of war, but they are all good people.". 😲
"...it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done that may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine..."
Yeah, I'm calling BS on that one. That is EXACTLY what they did. "We'll neeever hurt the locals. We double pinky promise."
Balfour Declaration and The Scofield Bible Hand in Hand!
**1917' **
The Scofield Reference Bible is a widely circulated study Bible edited and annotated by the American Bible student Cyrus I. Scofield, which popularized dispensationalism at the beginning of the 20th century. Published by Oxford University Press and containing the entire text of the traditional, Protestant King James Version, it first appeared in 1909 and was revised by the author in 1917.
[CYRUS SCOFIELD & THE ISRAEL DELUSION: THE SCOFIELD BIBLE]
Sons of Liberty Media
In this episode, I play a presentation by the late David Lutzweiler, author of The Praise of Folly: The Enigmatic Life & Theology of C.I. Scofield (https://amzn.to/3tS51lM). He not only exposes CI Scofield as a scandal-ridden man but a huckster, a man who abandoned his wife and children, and the man who popularized the theological construct known as "Dispensationalism." We'll also look and see how this theology not only made it into the American churches but also into our politics and foreign policy.
You are over the target. The lie of dispensationalism spread thru out American Christianity like a cancer. The primary driver was the Scofield Reference Bible. It puts the modern nation of Israel at the center of prophecy instead of the church (which is the Israel of God, both Jew & Gentile). Without the support of American Chrisitians there would be no nation of Israel. FYI I am a recovering dispensationalist! I repented about 15 years ago.
they threw the pastor out of my childhood church when he admitted he no longer believed in dispensationalism. then they replaced him with a socialist immigrant from ukraine. i left after that and havent really been back to church since
Well my experience (so far) has been different. I'm the Sunday school teacher for the adults at our church. Started about 2.5 years ago. Took the class thru the entire book of Romans. I had fun with "all Israel will be saved"! Now I'm teaching a series (verse by verse) on the book of Acts. Got to Acts 2:19-20 - I put up a number of commentaries that stated that "this great and notable day of the Lord" was referring to the destruction of Jerusalem & the Temple in AD 70. At the end of the lesson the Pastor told the class that interpretation was "preterism". Well that opened the door I can tell you. I just flat out told him "that's the way I see it after 15 years of study and that's the way I have to teach it". His response was "take your liberty". He also said "our church organization needs a symposium on dispensationalism". So I am encouraged. I did an entire write up/commentary on Matthew chapter 24 and sent it to him. His response: "we need to talk about this over lunch". Anyway I'm at the point that I'm not going to hide what I believe and I don't have to teach. I'll either sit down or walk away. I'm 71 years old! www.scripturerevealed.com
well apparently the church constitution did mention dispensationalism, not as one of the "core doctrines" or whatever that you need to be a member, but as one of the side things that the church believes. so once it came out the pastor didnt believe it anymore there were months of meetings deciding whether to kick him out or modify the church charter. in the end he was forced out and then the people who forced him out left anyway. and the new pastor was an absolute charlatan.
Well it's about the same with my church organization. If you don't adhere to dispensationalism you can't hold a license (as of 2005). I was asked to obtain a license but I declined because I knew I couldn't agree to all of the organization's guidelines.
i dont really see the big deal about it tbh. i probably believed in it when I was younger, dont agree with it now, and dont really think it's important enough to argue over.
I see preterism as a vast exegetical improvement over the unbiblical dispensationalism, but it still has some very weak points imho. The historic Church has clearly always favored what is now called Amillennialism (a misnomer of a term), because it is clearly derived from all the biblical texts taken together. These three lectures deal with Revelation and the millennium quite thoroughly:
Thanks I'll check those sources out. I really do believe that dispensationalism as a belief system will come to an end once the modern nation of Israel does not line up with that belief system......
The main tenants of Classical Dispensationalism existed long before Scofield.
While classical dispensationalism as formulated by theologians like C.I. Scofield and John Nelson Darby had its distinctive features, some of its main elements can be traced to earlier theological traditions and interpretations of the Bible. Here are a few examples:
1.Distinction Between Israel and the Church:
• Early Church Fathers like Justin Martyr (2nd century) and Irenaeus (2nd century) acknowledged distinctions between God’s dealings with Israel and the Church in their writings. They recognized that God had specific plans for both groups.
2.Futurist Interpretation of Prophecy:
•The belief in future prophetic events can be traced to various interpretations of the Book of Revelation in early Christian writings. Some early Church theologians, like Hippolytus (3rd century), held views that anticipated future fulfillment of certain prophecies.
3.Premillennialism:
• The concept of a future literal thousand-year reign of Christ has been present in different forms throughout Christian history. Papias (1st century) is often cited as an early proponent of premillennialism, and it has appeared in the writings of various Church Fathers.
4.Rapture:
• While the term “rapture” was not used in the same way as in classical dispensationalism, early Christian writers such as Ephraem the Syrian (4th century) and Jerome (4th-5th century) discussed the idea of believers being caught up to meet Christ in connection with 1 Thessalonians 4:17.
While classical dispensationalism combined these elements into a systematic theological framework and popularized them in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it’s important to recognize that many of these ideas had antecedents in Christian thought and theology prior to the Scofield Study Bible.
Dispensationalism itself has evolved over time, with variations and modifications to its original form.
Only one part of "dispensationalism" is correct. The diddly rules in the Old Testament were given only to the Israelites, not to any other people in the world. The Ten Commandments were given only to the Israelites, but some of those rules existed already from the time of Noah. Those were the rules that bound all men on earth. Then Jesus reiterated most, if not all, of the Ten Commandments, so we are all bound by those. Jews are not the only descendants of the Israelites or Nation of Israel in the Old Testament, but they act like they are.
But pre-trib rapture is crap and not supported by the Bible. It says there is only one Second Coming, and everyone, dead or alive, goes one place or the other.
Jews are not the only descendants of the Israelites or Nation of Israel in the Old Testament, but they act like they are.
NONSENSE.
It what way do jews today act like descendants of the Israelites?
They DO NOT.
They refuse to follow God's Law. They believe their rabbis are smarter than God, creating the Talmud to teach how to GET AROUND the Law.
They constantly steal from others. Their religious texts teach that pedophilia is fine. That lying and deceiving non-jews is a good thing. That stealing and murdering is justifiable if the victim is a non-jew.
They are taught to recite the Kol Nidrei at every Yom Kippur, which says that their promises are not valid from now (Yom Kippur) and for 1 year (until the next Yom Kippur, at which time they will repeat it again).
My vow is not a vow. My oath is not an oath.
This is why the dual citizens in Congress can take an oath to support and defend the Constitution ... BUT THEIR RELIGION SAYS IT IS NOT A VALID OATH. This explains their treasonous behavior.
They are NOT the Israelites of the Bible.
And they have never ACTED as if they were.
But they do deceive others into believing such a thing.
Yes they do act like they are. They claim the land that was supposed to belong to the Israelites. They are the only ones who claim things are "anti-semitic," when they are not the only Semitic people in the area. Arabs are Semitic. Also, most "Jews" in Israel aren't even Semitic.
Yes, they SAY they are, but they do NOT ACT like they are.
Whether or not they are semitic is IRRELEVANT to whether or not they are "God's Chosen People" (i.e. Israelites).
The Semites are anyone who was decended from Noah >> Shem/Sem.
The Bible traces a VERY CLEAR genetic lineage in the Bible:
God >> Adam >> Seth >> Noah >> Shem >> Abraham >> Isaac >> Jacob/Israel >> 12 Sons of Israel.
In the New Testament, we can further trace Jacob/Israel >> Judah >> Virgin Mary >> Jesus/God.
Going back to Shem, we traced down to Abraham. Abraham received the Covenant. The Covenant was passed to Issac, and NOT Ishmael. The Arabs are primarily from Ishamel, so they are NOT Israelites, even though they could be called Semites (Shem/Sem).
The Covenant was then passed from Isaac to Jacob/Israel, and NOT to Esau/Edom.
The jews are from Edom, among other lineage, but NOT from Jacob/Israel.
So, they also are NOT Israelites, though they can claim being Semites, as they are also from Shem/Sem (but not Israel).
Their own religious texts say they are Edomites, among other mixtures.
Edomites are not Israelites.
Jews have a great propensity to ... LIE. What do people not understand about this basic fact of jews?
They lie, and their religious texts tell them they MUST lie in order to be a "good jew."
So, they claim to be the only Semites, when they are not.
They claim to be the Israelites, when they are not.
They claim the Holocaust happened when it did not.
They claim the Holodomor never happened when it did.
In John 8:44, Jesus spoke directly to these jews:
Ye be of the father, the devil, and ye will do the desires of your father. He was a manslayer from the beginning, and he stood not in truth; for truth is not in him. When he speaketh lying, he speaketh of his own; for he is a liar, and father of it. (Wycliff Bible)
But they are still claiming the Promised Land as if they are "the ones." But they are not. The really real Jews are descended from Judah, but there are very few of those actually living in Israel.
BTW, even though my male line goes back to southern Germany, my Y-DNA goes back to central Asia, meaning I'm a tiny bit Semitic. But I can also trace a lot of other lines back to real Jewish people in the past and other related people.
But they are still claiming the Promised Land as if they are "the ones."
Right. Like I said, they lie.
But they are not.
Correct.
The really real Jews are descended from Judah
No, there are no jews who were descended from Judah. I realize the name sounds similar, but that is not their ancestry.
The Judahites were also Israelites (just broke off from the rest of the Israelite family, forming the kingdoms of Israel and Judah). They are all the same kin.
Jews are not part of that kin.
BTW, even though my male line goes back to southern Germany, my Y-DNA goes back to central Asia, meaning I'm a tiny bit Semitic. But I can also trace a lot of other lines back to real Jewish people in the past and other related people.
Well ... this will blow your mind.
Your Germanic history is of the Israelite people. The archeology and historical record -- outside of the Bible -- show that the people who lived there at the time, and were Isrealites, were White. The DNA of King Tut shows White European.
All the people who lived in that region at the time were White, though some were mixed blood (Arabs and Jews).
This is why the jews have worked hard to turn the story upside down and make it seem as if they were the Israelites. No, they have stolen the identity, as they have done numerous times throughout history.
"Semites" (again) are those who descended from Shem.
So, A LOT of people are technically of "semitic" origin.
Shem >> Abraham.
All from Abraham are semitic.
Abraham >> Isaac/Ishmael.
These sons were also semitic, but Ishmael mixed with other races of the time, and became the Arabs ("arab" in Hebrew means "mixed" race).
So, Arabs can be considered semitic.
Isaac >> Jacbo/Esau.
Esau (Edom) also mixed with other races, and became some of the jews. So, they can also be considered semitic.
Jacob (Israel) >> 12 Tribes of Israel (which includes the son named Judah) did NOT mix race with other races, and stayed pure White.
So, White Europeans can also be considered semitic people.
Technically, everyone on earth is Semitic, as we all have ancestors who descended from Shem on one line or another.
Through genealogy records that most mainstream historians despise, I can trace my ancestry all the way back to Noah on many lines. I have been working on genealogy for almost 60 years.
BTW, the Irish claimed to have come from Egypt. Red hair is common in Ireland, but a number of Egyptian mummies have red hair, perhaps confirming this old history.
The diddly rules in the Old Testament were given only to the Israelites, not to any other people in the world
Which is true, but keep in mind that classic dispensationalism taught a separate way of salvation for Israelites in the epoch of the diddly rules of the Law, by means of the diddly rules. Granted, no modern dispensationalist teaches this works heresy, but the roots are there on record.
In fact, Mormonism and classic dispensationalism have a lot of overlap in how they map and parse out the epochs of history in disconnected fashions, each ultimately setup to justify a special place for their own dogma at the end of the age.
Of course they would execute their own people. False flags are their best weapons. By executing their own people and in a horrific, wholesale manner they created a fictitious moral high-ground that went something like this: "Don't you believe Jews deserve their own homeland?"
There was no compelling emotional reason for a Jewish homeland in 1917.
There's an article that goes way way back before WW2 and just around this time that cites the killing of........ 6 million Jews. Yeah, it does exist. Not only do we have perceived guilt for the atrocities of WW2, the mass genocide of the Jewish people seems to happen on paper at least once a century.
Thanks for the link. That video is a classic. "Here I go," he says. I was just about to include it here but you beat me to it.
I saw a researcher speak who showed aerial photos during that period when 6 million were cremated in ovens. Neither the train loads of coke necessary for the task, nor plumes from the overworked smokestacks were visible.
I’m thinking some died but not near the magnitude they say. We use big numbers alll the time so we desensitize but if you actually saw what 6 million people in an area looked like I don’t think anyone would believe for a second they killed that many while their ammo was dwindling and they were fighting a 2 front war. I’ve been to stadiums with 100k and it’s a shitload of people. I cannot imagine 60x that
I believe several hundred thousand died, of typhus and starvation, largely caused by Allied railroad bombing. The Red Cross seemed to agree at the time as did the world census.
Don't forget the caravans of civilians following the German army as they exited the Eastern Front. Tens of thousands fled the approaching Red Army. The only ones who stayed were either willingly tovarich or partisans who would fight, die, or get sent into Russian work camps.
Work & prison camps turned into refugee camps is a more accurate description. It reflects the original IRT numbers.
Doing some digging on the history of modern day Israel and found these comments. The occurrence of the “6 Million” figure years before Hitler came to power, mentioned above, is utterly fascinating. Then I saw your comment. Very interested. Do you have any specific sauce I could look at regarding your claim?
I actually had two instances in the last two weeks that I was happy to witness.
I went to pay at rite aid and there was a gentleman lingering as if he was in line but not really. I gestured questioningly. I don't remember his exact words but his response was like 'Go ahead. I have all the time in the world, as I stand here thinking about the new world order'.
Then I was in line to pay for some meat at the grocery store. The cashier accidentally rung up my package for the lady in front of me. The lady made some comment about how she would not cook raw meat (she was buying a lot of processed food). So I said, pretty soon none of us will be, we'll be eating the bugs if they have their way. Of course, as I said this, I looked around to see people's faces and their responses. As I always do. Except this time, the guy behind me started shaking his head yes, in agreement. So I continued. ....the world economic forum, davos Bilderberg.... They all want us dead. And left it at that.
I've never gotten positive responses like that before. I usually just get strange looks. I was pleased.
I red pill wherever I go.,was at tractor supply (my pharmacy)..and went thru my whole list...dude behind me said..that ones true (about Big Mike)....
I do, as well. I can't sit back and idly watch our world being stolen from us. I'll take the 'you're a crazy lady' looks all day if I have to!!
I have that child like ability to blurt stuff out..retired now..chick I worked w said she's telling everyone I have dementia.lol
😄😄 My daughter gets embarrassed and walks away from me. They will realize eventually.
I've discovered that one of the check out women at the local grocery store has an idea of what's really going on since I overheard her conversation last week.
This week I asked her "Why do so many coworkers wear masks?". She said "They were casualties of war, but they are all good people.". 😲
I was with my grandson at the self-checkout and he looked at the screen and asked "Tax, What's that?"
"Theft.... well really it's called extortion". I said.
And I heard someone behind me chime in with "It sure is."
I think I just like me making people's eyebrows go up 😄 Love the little stories, thank you.
Yeah it's nice feeling to connect with a stranger on a common thought :).
It's a ground game now. Little tidbits here and there. Can't go full conspiracy or else you will look crazy but a couple of crumbs usually is enough
This is like an evolutionary leap in what it means to be socially polite.
"...it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done that may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine..."
Yeah, I'm calling BS on that one. That is EXACTLY what they did. "We'll neeever hurt the locals. We double pinky promise."
You mean the zionists broke a promise to the UK government? Shocking.
“The goal is to multiply instability, to provoke a conflict of cultures, peoples, world religions..." - V.V. Putin
The ONLY good thing about today,s world is that the masses are FINALLY questioning the NARRATIVE. This will lead to greater understanding. PATIENCE
Hopefully in between sportsball and social media they take some time to Google their Twitter and learn some things.
33 comments and not a single mention of Crypto Jews (khazars) vs The original tribes.
Balfour Declaration and The Scofield Bible Hand in Hand!
**1917' **
The Scofield Reference Bible is a widely circulated study Bible edited and annotated by the American Bible student Cyrus I. Scofield, which popularized dispensationalism at the beginning of the 20th century. Published by Oxford University Press and containing the entire text of the traditional, Protestant King James Version, it first appeared in 1909 and was revised by the author in 1917.
[CYRUS SCOFIELD & THE ISRAEL DELUSION: THE SCOFIELD BIBLE] Sons of Liberty Media
(https://www.bitchute.com/video/zpW7N0lg2uwH/)
In this episode, I play a presentation by the late David Lutzweiler, author of The Praise of Folly: The Enigmatic Life & Theology of C.I. Scofield (https://amzn.to/3tS51lM). He not only exposes CI Scofield as a scandal-ridden man but a huckster, a man who abandoned his wife and children, and the man who popularized the theological construct known as "Dispensationalism." We'll also look and see how this theology not only made it into the American churches but also into our politics and foreign policy.
You are over the target. The lie of dispensationalism spread thru out American Christianity like a cancer. The primary driver was the Scofield Reference Bible. It puts the modern nation of Israel at the center of prophecy instead of the church (which is the Israel of God, both Jew & Gentile). Without the support of American Chrisitians there would be no nation of Israel. FYI I am a recovering dispensationalist! I repented about 15 years ago.
they threw the pastor out of my childhood church when he admitted he no longer believed in dispensationalism. then they replaced him with a socialist immigrant from ukraine. i left after that and havent really been back to church since
Well my experience (so far) has been different. I'm the Sunday school teacher for the adults at our church. Started about 2.5 years ago. Took the class thru the entire book of Romans. I had fun with "all Israel will be saved"! Now I'm teaching a series (verse by verse) on the book of Acts. Got to Acts 2:19-20 - I put up a number of commentaries that stated that "this great and notable day of the Lord" was referring to the destruction of Jerusalem & the Temple in AD 70. At the end of the lesson the Pastor told the class that interpretation was "preterism". Well that opened the door I can tell you. I just flat out told him "that's the way I see it after 15 years of study and that's the way I have to teach it". His response was "take your liberty". He also said "our church organization needs a symposium on dispensationalism". So I am encouraged. I did an entire write up/commentary on Matthew chapter 24 and sent it to him. His response: "we need to talk about this over lunch". Anyway I'm at the point that I'm not going to hide what I believe and I don't have to teach. I'll either sit down or walk away. I'm 71 years old! www.scripturerevealed.com
well apparently the church constitution did mention dispensationalism, not as one of the "core doctrines" or whatever that you need to be a member, but as one of the side things that the church believes. so once it came out the pastor didnt believe it anymore there were months of meetings deciding whether to kick him out or modify the church charter. in the end he was forced out and then the people who forced him out left anyway. and the new pastor was an absolute charlatan.
Well it's about the same with my church organization. If you don't adhere to dispensationalism you can't hold a license (as of 2005). I was asked to obtain a license but I declined because I knew I couldn't agree to all of the organization's guidelines.
i dont really see the big deal about it tbh. i probably believed in it when I was younger, dont agree with it now, and dont really think it's important enough to argue over.
I see preterism as a vast exegetical improvement over the unbiblical dispensationalism, but it still has some very weak points imho. The historic Church has clearly always favored what is now called Amillennialism (a misnomer of a term), because it is clearly derived from all the biblical texts taken together. These three lectures deal with Revelation and the millennium quite thoroughly:
http://links.christreformed.org/irons/20211212-The-Millennial-Question.mp3
http://links.christreformed.org/irons/20211226-Interpreting-The-Millennium.mp3
http://links.christreformed.org/irons/20220102-Interpreting-The-Book-Of-Revelation.mp3
Thanks I'll check those sources out. I really do believe that dispensationalism as a belief system will come to an end once the modern nation of Israel does not line up with that belief system......
The main tenants of Classical Dispensationalism existed long before Scofield.
While classical dispensationalism as formulated by theologians like C.I. Scofield and John Nelson Darby had its distinctive features, some of its main elements can be traced to earlier theological traditions and interpretations of the Bible. Here are a few examples:
1.Distinction Between Israel and the Church:
2.Futurist Interpretation of Prophecy:
3.Premillennialism:
4.Rapture:
While classical dispensationalism combined these elements into a systematic theological framework and popularized them in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it’s important to recognize that many of these ideas had antecedents in Christian thought and theology prior to the Scofield Study Bible.
Dispensationalism itself has evolved over time, with variations and modifications to its original form.
Only one part of "dispensationalism" is correct. The diddly rules in the Old Testament were given only to the Israelites, not to any other people in the world. The Ten Commandments were given only to the Israelites, but some of those rules existed already from the time of Noah. Those were the rules that bound all men on earth. Then Jesus reiterated most, if not all, of the Ten Commandments, so we are all bound by those. Jews are not the only descendants of the Israelites or Nation of Israel in the Old Testament, but they act like they are.
But pre-trib rapture is crap and not supported by the Bible. It says there is only one Second Coming, and everyone, dead or alive, goes one place or the other.
NONSENSE.
It what way do jews today act like descendants of the Israelites?
They DO NOT.
They refuse to follow God's Law. They believe their rabbis are smarter than God, creating the Talmud to teach how to GET AROUND the Law.
They constantly steal from others. Their religious texts teach that pedophilia is fine. That lying and deceiving non-jews is a good thing. That stealing and murdering is justifiable if the victim is a non-jew.
They are taught to recite the Kol Nidrei at every Yom Kippur, which says that their promises are not valid from now (Yom Kippur) and for 1 year (until the next Yom Kippur, at which time they will repeat it again).
This is why the dual citizens in Congress can take an oath to support and defend the Constitution ... BUT THEIR RELIGION SAYS IT IS NOT A VALID OATH. This explains their treasonous behavior.
They are NOT the Israelites of the Bible.
And they have never ACTED as if they were.
But they do deceive others into believing such a thing.
Yes they do act like they are. They claim the land that was supposed to belong to the Israelites. They are the only ones who claim things are "anti-semitic," when they are not the only Semitic people in the area. Arabs are Semitic. Also, most "Jews" in Israel aren't even Semitic.
So what I wrote still stands true.
No, they do not ACT like they are.
Yes, they SAY they are, but they do NOT ACT like they are.
Whether or not they are semitic is IRRELEVANT to whether or not they are "God's Chosen People" (i.e. Israelites).
The Semites are anyone who was decended from Noah >> Shem/Sem.
The Bible traces a VERY CLEAR genetic lineage in the Bible:
God >> Adam >> Seth >> Noah >> Shem >> Abraham >> Isaac >> Jacob/Israel >> 12 Sons of Israel.
In the New Testament, we can further trace Jacob/Israel >> Judah >> Virgin Mary >> Jesus/God.
Going back to Shem, we traced down to Abraham. Abraham received the Covenant. The Covenant was passed to Issac, and NOT Ishmael. The Arabs are primarily from Ishamel, so they are NOT Israelites, even though they could be called Semites (Shem/Sem).
The Covenant was then passed from Isaac to Jacob/Israel, and NOT to Esau/Edom.
The jews are from Edom, among other lineage, but NOT from Jacob/Israel.
So, they also are NOT Israelites, though they can claim being Semites, as they are also from Shem/Sem (but not Israel).
Their own religious texts say they are Edomites, among other mixtures.
Edomites are not Israelites.
Jews have a great propensity to ... LIE. What do people not understand about this basic fact of jews?
They lie, and their religious texts tell them they MUST lie in order to be a "good jew."
So, they claim to be the only Semites, when they are not.
They claim to be the Israelites, when they are not.
They claim the Holocaust happened when it did not.
They claim the Holodomor never happened when it did.
In John 8:44, Jesus spoke directly to these jews:
But they are still claiming the Promised Land as if they are "the ones." But they are not. The really real Jews are descended from Judah, but there are very few of those actually living in Israel.
BTW, even though my male line goes back to southern Germany, my Y-DNA goes back to central Asia, meaning I'm a tiny bit Semitic. But I can also trace a lot of other lines back to real Jewish people in the past and other related people.
Right. Like I said, they lie.
Correct.
No, there are no jews who were descended from Judah. I realize the name sounds similar, but that is not their ancestry.
The Judahites were also Israelites (just broke off from the rest of the Israelite family, forming the kingdoms of Israel and Judah). They are all the same kin.
Jews are not part of that kin.
Well ... this will blow your mind.
Your Germanic history is of the Israelite people. The archeology and historical record -- outside of the Bible -- show that the people who lived there at the time, and were Isrealites, were White. The DNA of King Tut shows White European.
All the people who lived in that region at the time were White, though some were mixed blood (Arabs and Jews).
This is why the jews have worked hard to turn the story upside down and make it seem as if they were the Israelites. No, they have stolen the identity, as they have done numerous times throughout history.
"Semites" (again) are those who descended from Shem.
So, A LOT of people are technically of "semitic" origin.
Shem >> Abraham.
All from Abraham are semitic.
Abraham >> Isaac/Ishmael.
These sons were also semitic, but Ishmael mixed with other races of the time, and became the Arabs ("arab" in Hebrew means "mixed" race).
So, Arabs can be considered semitic.
Isaac >> Jacbo/Esau.
Esau (Edom) also mixed with other races, and became some of the jews. So, they can also be considered semitic.
Jacob (Israel) >> 12 Tribes of Israel (which includes the son named Judah) did NOT mix race with other races, and stayed pure White.
So, White Europeans can also be considered semitic people.
Again ... JEWS LIE (about everything).
Check this out:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zdXKiPjgZOdF/
Technically, everyone on earth is Semitic, as we all have ancestors who descended from Shem on one line or another.
Through genealogy records that most mainstream historians despise, I can trace my ancestry all the way back to Noah on many lines. I have been working on genealogy for almost 60 years.
BTW, the Irish claimed to have come from Egypt. Red hair is common in Ireland, but a number of Egyptian mummies have red hair, perhaps confirming this old history.
Even with this concession:
Which is true, but keep in mind that classic dispensationalism taught a separate way of salvation for Israelites in the epoch of the diddly rules of the Law, by means of the diddly rules. Granted, no modern dispensationalist teaches this works heresy, but the roots are there on record.
In fact, Mormonism and classic dispensationalism have a lot of overlap in how they map and parse out the epochs of history in disconnected fashions, each ultimately setup to justify a special place for their own dogma at the end of the age.
This is why I believe thew Holocaust DID happen.
Of course they would execute their own people. False flags are their best weapons. By executing their own people and in a horrific, wholesale manner they created a fictitious moral high-ground that went something like this: "Don't you believe Jews deserve their own homeland?"
There was no compelling emotional reason for a Jewish homeland in 1917.
But my how things changed oh so conveniently.
Oh contraire.....
There's an article that goes way way back before WW2 and just around this time that cites the killing of........ 6 million Jews. Yeah, it does exist. Not only do we have perceived guilt for the atrocities of WW2, the mass genocide of the Jewish people seems to happen on paper at least once a century.
Not just one article, dozens of them. This archived site lists 140.
https://archive.ph/M8bn9
Correct.
The 6,000,000 story started LONG before Hitler came to power.
It was published, over and over again (over several years) in newspapers.
https://rumble.com/vtv060-six-million-jews-1915-1938-6-6000000.html
Thanks for the link. That video is a classic. "Here I go," he says. I was just about to include it here but you beat me to it.
I saw a researcher speak who showed aerial photos during that period when 6 million were cremated in ovens. Neither the train loads of coke necessary for the task, nor plumes from the overworked smokestacks were visible.
I’m thinking some died but not near the magnitude they say. We use big numbers alll the time so we desensitize but if you actually saw what 6 million people in an area looked like I don’t think anyone would believe for a second they killed that many while their ammo was dwindling and they were fighting a 2 front war. I’ve been to stadiums with 100k and it’s a shitload of people. I cannot imagine 60x that
I believe several hundred thousand died, of typhus and starvation, largely caused by Allied railroad bombing. The Red Cross seemed to agree at the time as did the world census.
Don't forget the caravans of civilians following the German army as they exited the Eastern Front. Tens of thousands fled the approaching Red Army. The only ones who stayed were either willingly tovarich or partisans who would fight, die, or get sent into Russian work camps.
Work & prison camps turned into refugee camps is a more accurate description. It reflects the original IRT numbers.
When you say holocaust do you mean Dresden? The BURNT OFFERING SACRIFICE (holocaust) did happen in Dresden.
It has been proven that there were NO GAS CHAMBERS.
Ergo, it could not have happened.
Doing some digging on the history of modern day Israel and found these comments. The occurrence of the “6 Million” figure years before Hitler came to power, mentioned above, is utterly fascinating. Then I saw your comment. Very interested. Do you have any specific sauce I could look at regarding your claim?