TLDW: he claims to have invented a machine that pulls energy out of the electromagnetic field.
IMO we are being deliberately taught bad physics. Einstein and his space-time theory was likely a psyop to misdirect us from studying and understanding the aether, and the energy (physical and spiritual) that exists within it.
This guy: http://milesmathis.com/index.html has a whole bunch of scientific papers published outside the gatekeeper journals that solve many long standing physics problems. His charge field theory answers questions about gravity and probably explains some of what Tesla was doing. He is an oddball, but oddballs think outside the box. He shows his work yet he is still attacked for not fitting into the old existing theories. The academics shun him but his work is gaining traction in the private sector where truth equals money.
Him? He believes that no one understands how aircraft fly as there are 5 different theories of flight and its not possible for any aircraft to fly inverted. He knows about angle of attack though.
AI says....Edmund Whittaker, a British mathematician and historian of science, critiqued the prevailing narrative that placed Albert Einstein at the center of the development of the theory of relativity. In his work, particularly in "A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity," Whittaker argued that the theory of relativity was the result of contributions from many scientists, notably Hendrik Lorentz and Henri Poincaré, not just Einstein. Whittaker's account aimed to highlight these overlooked contributions, challenging the notion of Einstein's singular genius in the creation of relativity theory. His perspective sparked discussions on scientific discovery's collaborative nature and how credit is attributed within the scientific community.
Well, that's not true. You can obfuscate some data so that it adds up to what you want it to.
If I want you to believe that the empirical number of amazingness was 39, but it was in fact 42, all I would have to do is remove two and any references of either number.
They do this with all other data as well, especially in the incestuous peer reviewing community.
Not true. At one time the math said if they do a fusion bomb tje entire atmosphere would chain react and destroy the world. Theory wasn't true but math proved the theory.
Not true. At one time the math said if they do a fusion bomb tje entire atmosphere would chain react and destroy the world. Theory wasn't true but math proved the theory. Oppenheimer said it himself.
The most accurate thing you said here was “fusion bomb”.
I think the issue is that there’s no evidence that space and time create a “fabric”. It’s pushed so overwhelmingly on us through media and the education system that people believe that it’s true, and mock anyone who suggests otherwise.
Math is just a language. Like all other languages, the only requirement to use that language is that whatever you say must conform to the structure of the language. Thus math is always consistent within it's own definitions, i.e. it's either math or it's not.
However, like any other language, as long as you conform to its structure, you can use that language to say anything you want. Math has been used to create psyops for pretty much every single psyop that exists. For example, you can manipulate data, which creates a false reality. You don't even have to lie about the data, you just need to create categories that add up in a certain way to sell a specific narrative. In Covid for example, they didn't make the distinction between "died with covid," and "died from covid" when posting their super scary death totals. If they had, they wouldn't have been able to scare anyone.
There's a somewhat famous book called "How to lie with statistics" that goes into details of numerous tips and tricks on how to say anything you want with math and data; create any reality you desire.
These same criticisms go for physics theories. A theory in physics (or any scientific field) is just a model. It doesn't tell you what Reality is, it only models it using the data that is available at the time. In our case, we know with certainty that all of our models are wrong. What we don't know is how wrong. They obviously work pretty well for a lot of things, but they don't work for everything.
All the previous models that our current models supplanted worked really well too. Newton's gravity got supplanted by Einstein's model, but Newton's model worked really well, and we still use it today even though we say "it's totally wrong." Even the Earth centric models of the Universe from before the 1600s are used today. Maybe not for modelling planet behavior, but for other things we use the same math all the time (it's just an application of Fourier analysis). In fact the Platonic geocentric models worked so well, with a little modification to what Plato did, using the exact same premises (all orbits can be described by perfect epicycles), they can be made to work better than any other model we have.
Does that make them true? Is the Earth the center of the universe just because we can create a perfect mathematical model of such a system? We can apply that same system to any point in the universe as the center and create a perfect predictive system. So it's not really the best system to use, even though it was the dominant description of the universe for millennia. It wasn't supplanted because it didn't work, it was supplanted because it wasn't extensible.
The point is, all of these different models work really well, but they all have completely different foundations (starting axioms). The one we have completely rejected (Platonic geocentric model) actually has (potentially) the most accurate predictive power. Which one is true?
The correct answer is D: None of the above.
We don't know what the Truth is. Thinking that we do, or that our "science has proven" it is exactly the trap we are intended to believe in. The trap set up by the Cabal to control society for the past couple centuries.
Time is affected by speed and acceleration. The same with gravity. These must be accounted for because GPS satellites travel in a gravitational field. If you did not account for these, a spot on earth that your GPS calls HOME would soon be off by miles. If your GPS is accurate, the spacetime is calculated for.
Yes, these are forces that we can measure, calculate, and account for. But that doesn’t prove the theory of space time. Especially the idea that the sun is bending an otherwise 2D plane of it.
All of this could also be explained by an aetheric model. Perhaps the sun is travelling through an ocean of aether and the planets are electromagnetically locked into its wake.
That's almost exactly what my Dad's basement looks like. I can identify several of those instruments. My friends thought my Dad was communicating with aliens with all the weird stuff he has.
How many brilliant people have had their work shutdown by the machine that runs the world? They never want us to escape our maze. Breaking free is worth everything.
The electricity in your home town , to power housing communities is run off of "Magnets and an Armature". These are "Free & Clean" energy that is "Perpetual Motion Power". ( good enough to run neighborhood communities. ) The Big Stuff is ( MOST TIMES ) run / powered off of either Geo Thermal - or - Hydro. Go outside and look for all the smoke in the sky from the COAL being burned to to generate electrical power !!! It's the same lame lie as "Fossil Fuel". Secondly ; Our taxes have paid for all the infrastructure / equipment / man power to build Power Generation Plants / Oil Drilling Operations / Precious Metals - Orr Mining / Rail & Shipping - all on our DIME / Taxes. "They" - keep all the profits , and then charge us "Gas Tax" / Insane Electrical Bills / Harvest & Ship out all our natural resources all over the world for profit - for THEM - and nothing for US. It's called "CORRUPTION".
Just think for a moment that this invention was released to the public and our energy was free to power our homes and transportation. What happens to our economy? How many jobs would be lost in the electrical industry? Jobs in the auto industry? THAT is how these people think. They are only concerned with their profits and not the benefit of the planet or mankind. We saw this with the way Westinghouse and Edison treated Tesla. Tesla was truly a humanitarian with a wish to benefit mankind. He gave Westinghouse a free pass on all the millions he owed Tesla simply because Westinghouse told him it would bankrupt the company for him to pay Tesla what he owed him under contracts for the electric motor so Tesla tore up the contracts thinking Westinghouse was as much a humanitarian as he was-----WRONG.
I agree! I am just saying what they would say! The people that made horses and buggies just moved over to the auto industry. These people are motivated by greed and they hate change if it means it will cost them money!
That's not how open source works. The original design moves along, but others can "fork" designs off the original and e eryone can see what the others are doing. You can see what people are making progress in other areas and see potential paths forward you couldn't see before.
This post isn't about a perpetual motion machine, it's about a device that essentially harnesses electromagnetic fields and uses that to provide motion that then can be converted into energy much like a hydro-electric dam converts flowing water into electricity.
I have no clue if it works or not but you aren't discerning anything related to the claims this inventor made since it doesn't fit the definition of a perpetual motion machine.
A perpetual motion machine is a hypothetical device that operates indefinitely without an external energy source or input.
He claims his machine his a source / input of another type of energy making it an energy conversion device which wouldn't violate the laws of thermodynamics, which govern the fundamental principles of energy and its transformations.
If this invention is real it would be no more of a perpetual motion machine that a windmill is.
My understanding is that Newman's machine was battery-powered. (at 3:20 in OPs video)
The machine purportedly recharged the battery and provided additional power above and beyond the power generated to recharge the battery.
This would mean the power used to run it was less than the power output, and this would make it a perpetual motion machine.
The National Bureau of Standards (NBS), now known as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), by request of the patent office, tested the device for several months and got negative results. In every case presented in the NBS report, the output power was less than power input from the battery pack, and therefore the efficiency was less than 100%. The court therefore upheld the rejection of the patent application.
Newman argued that he had been mistreated by the patent office, and tried to have his motor legalized directly by the US Congress. He obtained a hearing on 30 July 1986 in front of several senators, but he was unsuccessful. During the hearing, Newman refused to have the machine tested by independent experts, and senator John Glenn pointed out that his supposedly independent expert actually had a prior business relationship with him.
The case is now cited in the USPTO's Manual of Patent Examining Procedure as an example of an "inoperative" invention that can't have any utility, concretely as a perpetual motion machine.
It's possible that wikipedia is publishing false information. It's possible the government is lying.
I am just sharing information so people see both sides and not just one. I would love for the free energy machine to exist and for the government to not suppress inventions.
The real fact of the matter is that the United States is sitting on the world's largest natural gas deposit. There is such an enormous quantity and volume that it will be a long time before it runs out.
We could have dirt-cheap energy with the signature of a pen, right now.
Incorrect, He is input more energy than he is receiving making it not a perpetual motion machine. It is the battery input + Electromagnetic motion.
Here is an example:
Imagine a battery powered device that uses energy to poke a ball at the edge of a cliff. The ball falls, and reaches terminal velocity before hitting a wheel, spinning it.
The wheel then spins enough to not only power the battery pack but has a surplus. There are many reasons why this is not perpetual motion: The matter is a finite resource that would take energy to place onto a cliff. The gravity is added to the input and the momentum generated by the ball is converted into electrical energy.
This is Similar to what's happening above except that the earth and sun are supplying a lot of the work, making it appear to be less work than it really is.
My understanding is that Newman's machine was battery-powered. (at 3:20 in OPs video)
A battery was involved, but not what powered the device. My car has a battery which is a critical part of it but is powered by gas. A 1949 Field Marshall Series 2 tractor can be started with a blank 12-gauge shotgun shell in place of hand cranking. That doesn't mean the tractor runs on ammunition.
A 1949 Field Marshall Series 2 tractor can be started with a blank 12-gauge shotgun shell in place of hand cranking. That doesn't mean the tractor runs on ammunition.
This has become my favorite analogy of all time on this board. Thanks fren!
I agree with you. I just looked him up, he did all this hallabalo in the early 80's & died in 2015. If his machine really worked & the govt wanted it suppressed he would have been suicided long ago. .
It's too bad the search function doesn't use emojies. One could search Vaccine Devil World (💉👹🌎) and see years of vaxx posts. It would make someone's research project very easy.
He should have made a handful of them and secretly had them working before getting the outside entities involved. Then, brought in hoards of scientists and the general public to show it worked, it was a simple design, and it was inexpensive to manufacture: making the government THE LAST to get involved.
Worse case: make it public domain info, like TNT was.
I wonder if we can find his designs anywhere? I have the mfg base to help get my own copy up and running.
Also Paul Pantone invented a device to make an engine run on water. They put him in an insane asylum. In Hanford Calif. they taught how to make one for lawn mowers in shop, until they were told to stop.
I don't know for sure but I think so. It has a plasma reactor, and You can even piss in it to work. Way back they were having fun putting them in Deisel Trucks and going to truck stops and filling up with water. They videoed the other truckers reactions and it was funny. A few followed just sure the truck would break down, but it didn't.
It might take me some time I will see if I can find more info in my papers. I had to move in a rush and lost a lot of my stuff. I think I might still have the plans, knock on wood.
Thanks for posting this OP, I've been interested and following suppressed technologies for over a decade now, and been on & off studying Tesla's stuff for years, and this is actually the first time I've heard of Joseph Newman and his story.
I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the physics we were all taught in school is inherently flawed. The paranoid control freaks have kept the true nature of electricity a secret for years because if it were to ever get out they are deathly afraid of how it could be used against them. They've convinced the gatekeepers that the world is not ready for it.
As a pre-teen, in the early ‘70’s, I saw “free energy” devices. The size of a washing machine, actually the magnets were in a washing machine, that were powering an entire house. I was blessed with an inventor father who patented a “fuel saving device” and was on the front page of Popular Mechanics magazine (for the younger crowd this was a top 10 magazine in the world). Everyone on this forum has seen or use a variation of my father’s invention. Big Oil forced him to sell to them and yes they have their ways to force you to sell. Many investors came to my father for assistance on the patent or patent pending process..see Big Oil does not want the knowledge available to the Public, thus no Patents issued. I know without a shadow of a doubt that our ancient ancestors knew how to capture energy and it is hidden from us. There is a “part of the riddle” missing that only a few have figured out and if they go Public they disappear.
It's not free energy if you need to spend money building machines to harness and convert it. My "free solar energy" cost me over $10k in solar panels and twice that much in inverters to make it useful and batteries to store it.
This tech is available now. Several working examples online. Indian government has plans to retrofit their entire container shipping industry. Lots of incredible possibilities and practical utilization. Best part is its retrofit tech. You just add the parts to existing engines & generators and the process works.
This isn't a over unity machine, it works by transforming matter, It runs on gasoline but its exhaust gases are 40% oxygen.
I hope Malcolm Bendall gets the credit for this, some folk are saying that it was invented by Randall Carlson, he just reported on it on the Rogan show and didn't invent it.
You're very welcome, fren. I've watched a lot of videos about free energy and the various dudes involved with it. This is the first one I've heard of that actually had a senator involved with his research. Interdasting, indeed.
Seeing one with so much backing & explaining that they are tapping into magnetic currents for energy has me thinking this is the most feasible of any of the "free" energy machines I have looked at.
It doesn't seem so much free as utilizing the magnetic currents all around us for potential energy.
That's kinda what I'm thinking. Similar to Tesla tapping into the "ether". I think he had a greater understanding of magnetism than anyone else in his era.
So, what did he do? Keep it from humanity because he couldn't get a patent? Since he had the original paperwork filed and rejected, he could have showed it to dozens of inventors .Had them recreate it, and made it available to humanity then sue the Patent Office for his rights. Why did he not? What else happened here?
There's certainly no proof of some machine which produces free energy. It would be good to know more, like is this guy still alive and if not who has the blueprints for his invention.
I would say it's unlikely that it works. Yeah, our government could attempt to stifle someone's invention, but I would think people in other countries would have picked up on this and brought it to market if it worked.
I wonder if the fact that the earth's magnetic axis is not in line with the rotational axis is significant. Does it have to be that way for some reason? Can you generate energy from that fact? Seems if you hover over one of the rotational poles, or any coordinate in orbit, the magnetic flux will always be changing and thus should generate a current in a wire loop.
An unrelated but I think interesting question is whether we'd survive on earth if there were no mountains. There are many places that seem to rely on snow pack and snow melt for water/irrigation.
Surely we have some smart people and Redneck inventors in this group that could reinvent this machine and just release it to the world open source. It doesn’t look that complicated.
Normally people who invent something that threatens to profits and control of energy companies are immediately murdered and their technology suppressed. They might also be arrested and thrown in jail if their reputations need to be destroyed, but usually immediately murdered. I guess maybe he had too much publicity to murder him? How would the climate change narrative work if this technology were available? Would have to think of another hoax. No, this guy never had a chance.
TLDW: he claims to have invented a machine that pulls energy out of the electromagnetic field.
IMO we are being deliberately taught bad physics. Einstein and his space-time theory was likely a psyop to misdirect us from studying and understanding the aether, and the energy (physical and spiritual) that exists within it.
This guy: http://milesmathis.com/index.html has a whole bunch of scientific papers published outside the gatekeeper journals that solve many long standing physics problems. His charge field theory answers questions about gravity and probably explains some of what Tesla was doing. He is an oddball, but oddballs think outside the box. He shows his work yet he is still attacked for not fitting into the old existing theories. The academics shun him but his work is gaining traction in the private sector where truth equals money.
Can confirm...
source:am oddball....
Exactly Tesla was also a oddball.
🙏🏻
Him? He believes that no one understands how aircraft fly as there are 5 different theories of flight and its not possible for any aircraft to fly inverted. He knows about angle of attack though.
AI says....Edmund Whittaker, a British mathematician and historian of science, critiqued the prevailing narrative that placed Albert Einstein at the center of the development of the theory of relativity. In his work, particularly in "A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity," Whittaker argued that the theory of relativity was the result of contributions from many scientists, notably Hendrik Lorentz and Henri Poincaré, not just Einstein. Whittaker's account aimed to highlight these overlooked contributions, challenging the notion of Einstein's singular genius in the creation of relativity theory. His perspective sparked discussions on scientific discovery's collaborative nature and how credit is attributed within the scientific community.
You can't turn mathematics into a psyop. It either adds up or it doesn't.
Well, that's not true. You can obfuscate some data so that it adds up to what you want it to.
If I want you to believe that the empirical number of amazingness was 39, but it was in fact 42, all I would have to do is remove two and any references of either number.
They do this with all other data as well, especially in the incestuous peer reviewing community.
Not true. At one time the math said if they do a fusion bomb tje entire atmosphere would chain react and destroy the world. Theory wasn't true but math proved the theory.
Oppenheimer said it himself.
The most accurate thing you said here was “fusion bomb”.
It was all accurate..
I think the issue is that there’s no evidence that space and time create a “fabric”. It’s pushed so overwhelmingly on us through media and the education system that people believe that it’s true, and mock anyone who suggests otherwise.
Math is just a language. Like all other languages, the only requirement to use that language is that whatever you say must conform to the structure of the language. Thus math is always consistent within it's own definitions, i.e. it's either math or it's not.
However, like any other language, as long as you conform to its structure, you can use that language to say anything you want. Math has been used to create psyops for pretty much every single psyop that exists. For example, you can manipulate data, which creates a false reality. You don't even have to lie about the data, you just need to create categories that add up in a certain way to sell a specific narrative. In Covid for example, they didn't make the distinction between "died with covid," and "died from covid" when posting their super scary death totals. If they had, they wouldn't have been able to scare anyone.
There's a somewhat famous book called "How to lie with statistics" that goes into details of numerous tips and tricks on how to say anything you want with math and data; create any reality you desire.
These same criticisms go for physics theories. A theory in physics (or any scientific field) is just a model. It doesn't tell you what Reality is, it only models it using the data that is available at the time. In our case, we know with certainty that all of our models are wrong. What we don't know is how wrong. They obviously work pretty well for a lot of things, but they don't work for everything.
All the previous models that our current models supplanted worked really well too. Newton's gravity got supplanted by Einstein's model, but Newton's model worked really well, and we still use it today even though we say "it's totally wrong." Even the Earth centric models of the Universe from before the 1600s are used today. Maybe not for modelling planet behavior, but for other things we use the same math all the time (it's just an application of Fourier analysis). In fact the Platonic geocentric models worked so well, with a little modification to what Plato did, using the exact same premises (all orbits can be described by perfect epicycles), they can be made to work better than any other model we have.
Does that make them true? Is the Earth the center of the universe just because we can create a perfect mathematical model of such a system? We can apply that same system to any point in the universe as the center and create a perfect predictive system. So it's not really the best system to use, even though it was the dominant description of the universe for millennia. It wasn't supplanted because it didn't work, it was supplanted because it wasn't extensible.
The point is, all of these different models work really well, but they all have completely different foundations (starting axioms). The one we have completely rejected (Platonic geocentric model) actually has (potentially) the most accurate predictive power. Which one is true?
The correct answer is D: None of the above.
We don't know what the Truth is. Thinking that we do, or that our "science has proven" it is exactly the trap we are intended to believe in. The trap set up by the Cabal to control society for the past couple centuries.
Well said
Same can be said of science in general. Yet here we are in the age of the reproducibility crisis.
But we don’t know yet if he’s telling the truth?
Space time is true. You prove it every time you use GPS.
How so?
Time is affected by speed and acceleration. The same with gravity. These must be accounted for because GPS satellites travel in a gravitational field. If you did not account for these, a spot on earth that your GPS calls HOME would soon be off by miles. If your GPS is accurate, the spacetime is calculated for.
Lucky us.
Yes, these are forces that we can measure, calculate, and account for. But that doesn’t prove the theory of space time. Especially the idea that the sun is bending an otherwise 2D plane of it.
All of this could also be explained by an aetheric model. Perhaps the sun is travelling through an ocean of aether and the planets are electromagnetically locked into its wake.
Here is a list of 50 over unity machines that have been ignored or suppressed.
http://web.archive.org/web/20220429004028/http://www.cheniere.org/misc/oulist.htm
That's almost exactly what my Dad's basement looks like. I can identify several of those instruments. My friends thought my Dad was communicating with aliens with all the weird stuff he has.
How many brilliant people have had their work shutdown by the machine that runs the world? They never want us to escape our maze. Breaking free is worth everything.
TOO many.
The electricity in your home town , to power housing communities is run off of "Magnets and an Armature". These are "Free & Clean" energy that is "Perpetual Motion Power". ( good enough to run neighborhood communities. ) The Big Stuff is ( MOST TIMES ) run / powered off of either Geo Thermal - or - Hydro. Go outside and look for all the smoke in the sky from the COAL being burned to to generate electrical power !!! It's the same lame lie as "Fossil Fuel". Secondly ; Our taxes have paid for all the infrastructure / equipment / man power to build Power Generation Plants / Oil Drilling Operations / Precious Metals - Orr Mining / Rail & Shipping - all on our DIME / Taxes. "They" - keep all the profits , and then charge us "Gas Tax" / Insane Electrical Bills / Harvest & Ship out all our natural resources all over the world for profit - for THEM - and nothing for US. It's called "CORRUPTION".
The whole thing is a racket; and I don't mean the kind used to hit tennis balls.
Delivery surcharge. Infrastructure Fee. Carbon Tax. Sales Tax. Federal Tax
Tax on tax
Hydrogen IS quite something
Just think for a moment that this invention was released to the public and our energy was free to power our homes and transportation. What happens to our economy? How many jobs would be lost in the electrical industry? Jobs in the auto industry? THAT is how these people think. They are only concerned with their profits and not the benefit of the planet or mankind. We saw this with the way Westinghouse and Edison treated Tesla. Tesla was truly a humanitarian with a wish to benefit mankind. He gave Westinghouse a free pass on all the millions he owed Tesla simply because Westinghouse told him it would bankrupt the company for him to pay Tesla what he owed him under contracts for the electric motor so Tesla tore up the contracts thinking Westinghouse was as much a humanitarian as he was-----WRONG.
The auto industry would have survived. It just would have used a different type of power.
I agree! I am just saying what they would say! The people that made horses and buggies just moved over to the auto industry. These people are motivated by greed and they hate change if it means it will cost them money!
Hemp panels and hemp oil for power. The first model T's were made like this but others objected.
Yep but fear of change and costing them bucks motivates them to only change if they have the upper hand in making the money!
Why worry about patents? Open source it... that's exactly what Randall Carlson and others are doing with the vagra "thunderstorm generator."
Randall Carlson just reports about it, it was invented by Malcolm Bendall.
https://www.strikefoundation.earth/
That's not how open source works. The original design moves along, but others can "fork" designs off the original and e eryone can see what the others are doing. You can see what people are making progress in other areas and see potential paths forward you couldn't see before.
Five Perpetual Motion Machines, and Why None of Them Work
Some counter arguments for discerning purposes.
You're making a category error.
This post isn't about a perpetual motion machine, it's about a device that essentially harnesses electromagnetic fields and uses that to provide motion that then can be converted into energy much like a hydro-electric dam converts flowing water into electricity.
I have no clue if it works or not but you aren't discerning anything related to the claims this inventor made since it doesn't fit the definition of a perpetual motion machine.
A perpetual motion machine is a hypothetical device that operates indefinitely without an external energy source or input.
He claims his machine his a source / input of another type of energy making it an energy conversion device which wouldn't violate the laws of thermodynamics, which govern the fundamental principles of energy and its transformations.
If this invention is real it would be no more of a perpetual motion machine that a windmill is.
My understanding is that Newman's machine was battery-powered. (at 3:20 in OPs video)
The machine purportedly recharged the battery and provided additional power above and beyond the power generated to recharge the battery.
This would mean the power used to run it was less than the power output, and this would make it a perpetual motion machine.
sauce
It's possible that wikipedia is publishing false information. It's possible the government is lying.
I am just sharing information so people see both sides and not just one. I would love for the free energy machine to exist and for the government to not suppress inventions.
The real fact of the matter is that the United States is sitting on the world's largest natural gas deposit. There is such an enormous quantity and volume that it will be a long time before it runs out.
We could have dirt-cheap energy with the signature of a pen, right now.
Incorrect, He is input more energy than he is receiving making it not a perpetual motion machine. It is the battery input + Electromagnetic motion.
Here is an example: Imagine a battery powered device that uses energy to poke a ball at the edge of a cliff. The ball falls, and reaches terminal velocity before hitting a wheel, spinning it. The wheel then spins enough to not only power the battery pack but has a surplus. There are many reasons why this is not perpetual motion: The matter is a finite resource that would take energy to place onto a cliff. The gravity is added to the input and the momentum generated by the ball is converted into electrical energy.
This is Similar to what's happening above except that the earth and sun are supplying a lot of the work, making it appear to be less work than it really is.
A battery was involved, but not what powered the device. My car has a battery which is a critical part of it but is powered by gas. A 1949 Field Marshall Series 2 tractor can be started with a blank 12-gauge shotgun shell in place of hand cranking. That doesn't mean the tractor runs on ammunition.
This has become my favorite analogy of all time on this board. Thanks fren!
Thanks! I love good analogies and try to keep them original.
That one is original alright! 👏🏻
I agree with you. I just looked him up, he did all this hallabalo in the early 80's & died in 2015. If his machine really worked & the govt wanted it suppressed he would have been suicided long ago. .
Perpetual motion you say? I see your hypothesis and raise you Karpen's Pile.
https://www.worldrecordacademy.org/records/technology/longest-running-wet-cell-battery-karpen-s-pile-218245
🫡🪖🎖 Perhaps. But only three that are well coordinated. Placed at the beginning and end. 🫡🪖🎖
It's too bad the search function doesn't use emojies. One could search Vaccine Devil World (💉👹🌎) and see years of vaxx posts. It would make someone's research project very easy.
Ha, that's a fun reference!
If I stop my emojies for any reason, you'll know my account has been hacked, and the glowies got me. Please send help!
u/#glowie u/#trumpbeatdown
Scientist are behind the curve.
Neumann should have given the idea away. He let them win.
He should have made a handful of them and secretly had them working before getting the outside entities involved. Then, brought in hoards of scientists and the general public to show it worked, it was a simple design, and it was inexpensive to manufacture: making the government THE LAST to get involved.
Worse case: make it public domain info, like TNT was.
I wonder if we can find his designs anywhere? I have the mfg base to help get my own copy up and running.
Also Paul Pantone invented a device to make an engine run on water. They put him in an insane asylum. In Hanford Calif. they taught how to make one for lawn mowers in shop, until they were told to stop.
I don't know for sure but I think so. It has a plasma reactor, and You can even piss in it to work. Way back they were having fun putting them in Deisel Trucks and going to truck stops and filling up with water. They videoed the other truckers reactions and it was funny. A few followed just sure the truck would break down, but it didn't.
It might take me some time I will see if I can find more info in my papers. I had to move in a rush and lost a lot of my stuff. I think I might still have the plans, knock on wood.
Viktor Schauberger has entered the room.
2025, the year of breakaway, civilization, technology disclosure
This is altogether not surprising, but infuriating and heartbreaking nonetheless.
We have been lied to on such a massive scale to be kept subjugated.
Thanks for posting this OP, I've been interested and following suppressed technologies for over a decade now, and been on & off studying Tesla's stuff for years, and this is actually the first time I've heard of Joseph Newman and his story.
I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the physics we were all taught in school is inherently flawed. The paranoid control freaks have kept the true nature of electricity a secret for years because if it were to ever get out they are deathly afraid of how it could be used against them. They've convinced the gatekeepers that the world is not ready for it.
If people think this is amazing, the quantum tech will freak people the fuck out(like hair on fire freak-out)........
As a pre-teen, in the early ‘70’s, I saw “free energy” devices. The size of a washing machine, actually the magnets were in a washing machine, that were powering an entire house. I was blessed with an inventor father who patented a “fuel saving device” and was on the front page of Popular Mechanics magazine (for the younger crowd this was a top 10 magazine in the world). Everyone on this forum has seen or use a variation of my father’s invention. Big Oil forced him to sell to them and yes they have their ways to force you to sell. Many investors came to my father for assistance on the patent or patent pending process..see Big Oil does not want the knowledge available to the Public, thus no Patents issued. I know without a shadow of a doubt that our ancient ancestors knew how to capture energy and it is hidden from us. There is a “part of the riddle” missing that only a few have figured out and if they go Public they disappear.
It's not free energy if you need to spend money building machines to harness and convert it. My "free solar energy" cost me over $10k in solar panels and twice that much in inverters to make it useful and batteries to store it.
Piggyback relevant tech link: Clean Energy Water Dynamic Plasmoid Energy
This tech is available now. Several working examples online. Indian government has plans to retrofit their entire container shipping industry. Lots of incredible possibilities and practical utilization. Best part is its retrofit tech. You just add the parts to existing engines & generators and the process works.
This isn't a over unity machine, it works by transforming matter, It runs on gasoline but its exhaust gases are 40% oxygen.
I hope Malcolm Bendall gets the credit for this, some folk are saying that it was invented by Randall Carlson, he just reported on it on the Rogan show and didn't invent it.
Tag for research
Why tease us with a six minute video? Dude is easy to find, and the experts agree with him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XryGfWn3ALk
Thank you for this link. Some interesting stuff here.
You're very welcome, fren. I've watched a lot of videos about free energy and the various dudes involved with it. This is the first one I've heard of that actually had a senator involved with his research. Interdasting, indeed.
Seeing one with so much backing & explaining that they are tapping into magnetic currents for energy has me thinking this is the most feasible of any of the "free" energy machines I have looked at.
It doesn't seem so much free as utilizing the magnetic currents all around us for potential energy.
That's kinda what I'm thinking. Similar to Tesla tapping into the "ether". I think he had a greater understanding of magnetism than anyone else in his era.
So, what did he do? Keep it from humanity because he couldn't get a patent? Since he had the original paperwork filed and rejected, he could have showed it to dozens of inventors .Had them recreate it, and made it available to humanity then sue the Patent Office for his rights. Why did he not? What else happened here?
There's certainly no proof of some machine which produces free energy. It would be good to know more, like is this guy still alive and if not who has the blueprints for his invention.
I would say it's unlikely that it works. Yeah, our government could attempt to stifle someone's invention, but I would think people in other countries would have picked up on this and brought it to market if it worked.
I wonder if the fact that the earth's magnetic axis is not in line with the rotational axis is significant. Does it have to be that way for some reason? Can you generate energy from that fact? Seems if you hover over one of the rotational poles, or any coordinate in orbit, the magnetic flux will always be changing and thus should generate a current in a wire loop.
An unrelated but I think interesting question is whether we'd survive on earth if there were no mountains. There are many places that seem to rely on snow pack and snow melt for water/irrigation.
Surely we have some smart people and Redneck inventors in this group that could reinvent this machine and just release it to the world open source. It doesn’t look that complicated.
Normally people who invent something that threatens to profits and control of energy companies are immediately murdered and their technology suppressed. They might also be arrested and thrown in jail if their reputations need to be destroyed, but usually immediately murdered. I guess maybe he had too much publicity to murder him? How would the climate change narrative work if this technology were available? Would have to think of another hoax. No, this guy never had a chance.
Practicality.