I recall in one of the globalist documents (forget which ones) that they wanted to push women's sports, which is kinda suspect bc why would the UN or WEF or whatever want women in sports? I think it's just a social engineering / conditioning type of agenda.
Sports like swimming, volleyball, track and field, gymnastics involve women being scantily clad so it makes it normal for women to show off their bodies but under the cover of sports. And this is done to even to underage girls. So this brainwashes / brutalizes the women thinking it is normal to dress like a whore and gets them used to dressing like whores and it influences women who watch them on TV to dress like whores. And also the boys will be further brainwashed / brutalize into sexualizing women bc how could they not given what they are being presented with on national TV??
This is genius bc it leverages male and female nature against them: women love attention (so dress like a whore) and men are visual (watch dem hos).
Girl should not be paraded on TV as whores, they should be protected and cherished as future wives and mothers. This solves the trannys in women's sports issue.
It's a giant psyop and social engineering. Ban women's sports.
I don't really agree.
Wouldn't it be a shame to disallow what sporty women want to do? Some women are naturally tomboys, competitive or athletic.
I don't see it as a sexualising thing in most cases.
Most of the clothes worn for sports are to better perform said sport, it seems to me. Nobody has a cow about itty bitty speedo swim trunks on male swimmers do they.
I've always said the increased speed of those itty bitty speedo's was all in their heads.
I have always refused to watch male swimming or diving competitions specifically because I have no desire whatsoever to have to look at a bunch of guys wearing banana hammocks.
All you need to do is watch the women's gymnastics.......... I am embarrassed for these girls. And of course swimming is not better. The more a woman takes off, the more she is conditioned. Little girls and boys have a natural, God given modesty to protect them. So it is imperative that they strip them of this modesty. MOTHERS AND DADDYS NEED TO BE PARENTS WITH GOOD SENSE. JUST BECAUSE YOUR NEIGHBOR DOESN'T MIND HER CHILD BEING ALMOST NAKED DOESN'T MEAN YOU GO ALONG WITH THE CROWD. PARENTS NEED TO WAKE UP AND TAKE CHARGE.
In some dystopian timeline, there are only men's sports and tranny sports. In fact, all women have been eliminated, since everyone is a government vat baby, a gene-edited clone.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3691149/Track-field-glamour-girl-Michelle-Jenneke-s-pre-race-dance-moves-settle-nerves-Rio-Olympics.html
Don't let her ruin it for everyone else.
Ruin what, exactly?
Competition in moving on a rubber track the fastest for 7 years until becoming too old to compete with the new crop and settling into coaching or selling track equipment for other young girls who want to try and move along a rubber track the fastest for 7 years until they too become too old?
Competing to throw a sphere through a circle the most times in an hour?
Smashing into each other at the highest possible speeds, causing massive traumatic injuries in some of our strongest people, all to move some sewn hide across a line?
These things require exponential growth, from practical business standpoints, to be “sustainable”, which inherently means that they aren’t. What are the costs of shifting out of these models?
The pragmatic differences between a five year old winning a round of Dance, Dance, Revolution at an arcade and winning hurdles at the Olympics are the pride, glory, years of effort, and monetary incentives attached.
A more righteously minded athlete will give the glory to God, but is that glory worth, what was it even there for, and is that truly what God wants from us?
I know we enjoy them. I once did. My point is only that we need to truly take a step back and inspect what it is that we are truthfully doing here, what we are truly gaining, and what these things are truly costing us.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17sOx8QHNE/x/c/4Z8k2baP4qn
If you prefer, I could say the same things about this new eSports industry. This is also openly an effort at deconstruction, but with an eye toward righteousness! There is value in sports, and we aught be deliberate in knowing what it is and why we want it there.
This is the most absolute dumbest post I've seen here in a while.
And how
Because it's barking at trees. The last paragraph before the last sentence I believe everyone can agree with though, except it won't solve men in women's sports.
No.
Women should be encouraged to participate in athletics as part of fitness, competition, and sportsmanship.
They dress that way generally because they want to and it usually isn't like a "whore" as you assert.
My wife went to college on scholarship, playing volleyball and softball. To this day she works to maintain some degree of fitness. (over 50) These are good habits to make.
Don't let these globalists bastards win by destroying women's sports.
Now women's professional sports is another matter altogether. There should generally not be equal pay because women simply can't compete with men in the vast majority of cases. One exception is women officials. Women see far more than men and women remember far more than men. This would be an area to make the best use of their natural abilities.
What’s your basis of the ‘see more’ and ‘remember more’ claims? I’ve heard that men have better eyesight at distance and better depth perception but women are better able to differentiate between subtle hues. Hunting vs gathering.
There was a test that was done on men and women which; unfortunately, I can't google up for the life of me. One at a time, men and women were put into a holding room with various items. They were told they were being put there before going into another room where the actual test would be given. Well, the holding room was the test location. After being placed into the holding room for a set amount of time, the men and women were questioned what they saw in the room and women could recall more items in the room than men. Like you implied, women make good gatherers.
I think in general, IMO, men are able to focus more deeply on one thing than women (we go into mission mode; hunting mode), but women are able to juggle multiple things where men can't. (cooking dinner while carrying the child while talking on the phone)
I suppose the items were removed from view before the subjects were questioned about the items. While the items were in view, where the subjects ever told that they would be questioned about the items later? If there was no explicit incentive to memorize the items, then I suspect the study was testing something besides memory.
In NFL refereeing, there are so many of them that each one has a specific focus. The most multi-tasking that their field of vision requires is limited to the length of a player. For example, how far his hands are extending the ball as his foot steps on the sideline. People of either sex can be trained to track concurrently the locations of a couple things that are only a few feet apart, and on the close calls there is technological assistance.
They were not told that they would be questioned later about the items.
You could argue quite convincingly that society would be a in a lot better place if women stayed home and raised kids and the men went out and worked one job that was enough to provide for their family. But women should still be allowed to work. I support more options, not less, for people. The problem is all the propaganda and gross agendas involved in everything. It can never just be a bunch of women playing soccer, there has to be a racial problem or a transgender problem or a pay rate problem, etc.
They sold it to women that they could Choose to stay home and raise a family or they could Choose to work. How did that work out? For many it’s not a choice any more, reality is women have to work and families need two incomes. How convenient. Now the State is raising (indoctrinating) all the kids while all the Moms are at work.
exactly the plan, yes. Destroying the family was the ultimate goal, but I believe having two taxable incomes per home rather than one was the initial reason. There is a quote out there by one of these creatures (rockefeller? kissinger? who knows its probly from the 70s at least) that spells this motivation out.
Yes! And another opposite! It was sold as Women’s Liberation but was really Women Enslavement.
I wish it was that way in most cases. I am sooo tired of "edgy career women" who are shitty about, and to, men. Women in he workplace treat each other horribly too.
I disagree. At the risk of doxxing myself, my wife was the first female to get a full athletic ride (basketball) to Georgia Tech. Without it there is no way she would have been able to attend college. She was the first female collegiate player to score 1000 points (pre-3 point era) in her career with 1068 pts. And she only played 3 years and graduated with an engineering degree. She was inducted into the GT Athletic Hall of Fame in 1991 and as an ACC Legend in 2008. She's 6' tall (5'12" as she says because she thought it wasn't cool for a girl to be 6' tall). She's just a farm girl from a very small Northwest Georgia mountain town. When she was 59 years old she started showing signs of dementia. She's 67 now and I've been her sole caretaker for these last 8 years.
The half-naked aspect isn't a part of the sport, it's a influenced by a Godless society. To say women shouldn't play sports is like saying women shouldn't be able to go to the beach or go swimming because some women wear skimpy bikinis.
That's all nice but that single case doesn't offset the harm of millions of girls being negatively influenced and psyoped to dress like / be whores.
modest swimwear is a thing:
https://www.uvskinz.com/blogs/live/the-best-and-most-flattering-modest-swimsuits-for-women-with-upf
skimpy bikinis shouldn't even be a thing either. I think the original inventor had a hard time getting models to model the bikini bc it was so scandalous. He had to get an actual prostitute to wear it. This just shows how far we've fallen as a society. The women are so brutalized that they went from being scandalized from wearing a bikini to flaunting it on instagram.
women's sports / bikins on the whole just degrade the moral fabric of a society and morally degenerate people are much easier to control and invade. and that is a worse outcome than a single woman doing well in college sports. simple cost / benefit analysis.
That's a cute comeback but it doesn't make any sense. I never said there wasn't modest swimwear. I said, it's the influence of a Godless society is why so you see the skimpy swimwear. Every woman that goes swimming isn't a whore. Every girl that plays a sport isn't a whore. When my wife played the girls dressed in baggy shorts and full short sleeved tops. She was also the team's Bible class leader. I don't know if that's even allowed anymore. The girls that were raised right for the most part haven't changed, society has.
A God-filled society has been brought down on multiple fronts, one of them being female athletes. Not every woman going swimming is a whore, but having that plastered on ESPN certainly is not helping. The pragmatic solution will probably be something like getting rid of professional woman leagues, getting rid of sponsorships, and just having private leagues that are not televised with modest clothing.
You don’t like women in skin-tight revealing competition attire? I’m with ya!
You abhor trannys competing against real women? Me too!
So, maybe we should ban skimpy outfits and confused men from women’s sports? No? Your solution is… to ban women’s sport altogether?
You are a fucking moronic idiot. Go ahead and report me - I’d be proud to get a temporary ban just to make sure that you know how fucking monumentally retarded you are.
There’s room for politeness here.
Unless you’re a troll, in which case there are lovely deport buttons.
Some ideas are too insanely stupid to be coddled with politeness. Deport away.
Elsewhere, there was a suggestion of removing title ix, which artificially promotes them.
I’d agree with you that banning them is silly. Bans need to be widely accepted to work, and should only be imposed locally.
However, the thought direction is not invalid.
My unpopular female opinion: I agree with you. Not a fan of the half nude requirement in all women's sports. And I just saw a video the other day of two teens..boy and girl...in a wrestling match. The girl, obvious tomboy, and the boy, bless his heart, almost completely paralyzed with fear of his own instincts( looked like he was trying to avoid a boner). Everything seems to be about forcing people to be something they're not. It's everywhere. How much sexual aggression could be avoided if this were not the case?
You are projecting. If you can’t see girls in sports uniforms without calling them whores you need to take a step back. Stop watching porn.
This seems like a sensible compromise.
You make some ok points but your solution of increased politicization of the issue is the wrong way. We don’t need more legislation, more bans, or more tax spending. We need less. We should de-politicize the issue. Repeal Title IX. If access and participation need to be coerced by force of law, then it’s not meant to be. Let institutional spending and scholarships be awarded voluntarily. Let the institutions calculate their own profitability and the value of their public relations endeavors. Let no tax money go to college grants, or to professional sports stadiums, or to Olympic teams or committees. Let people be free to fund, support, or participate in these activities as they see fit, with no one coerced.
If all sports leagues and teams are private associations, then they can make their own rules of admittance. If a league wants to ban someone based on his chromosomes, that should be their right to do so. If a split competition organization wants to pay its male athletes more than its female athletes, that should be their business, and a rival organization that thinks it has better ideas is free to enter the marketplace. The US women’s World Cup team were granted a court hearing about equal pay. It got shot down because the women are paid more than the men in proportion to how much money they bring in. Anyway, that they even got a hearing is ridiculous. The government shouldn’t be involved at any stage.
Let’s firstly agree that sports, for both men and women, as well as entertainment as a whole, college, and many other features of modern “American Culture” have attained far too high of a position in society and need to be seriously knocked back.
Never mind all the subversion they use sports for, even at face value they’ve built us a completely inapplicable culture that has exceptionally low applicability value to anything that’s actually real. This massive time wasting exercise is a huge reason we are in the process of being overtaken.
The end goal, by my estimation, should be promotion of life, godliness, freedom, and peace. If those are good endgoals, where does sports, in status of a sacred cow, fit in them? If someone wants to spend their freedom pursuing sports within that paradigm to an extent, there’s nothing wrong with it, but it should be asked if that is worthy of anything more than a hobby.
There are a lot of life choices that we’ve made as a society that may well have seemed fine, but we are seeing where they’ve gotten us. Do we truly want to repeat that?
Forget the OP’s comments on sexuality in sports, which is most definitely a thing, but what other things do our pursuits of sporting cost us that might be higher goals than a pursuit of flesh at the cost of youth and more truly productive ends? That’s for the people who succeed in sports, what about all the people who fail?
We all have a lot of circumcision to do, let’s be careful and deliberate about it.
Track and filed uniform look fine… What about ballet or dance / yoga
I guess music instruments or drawing/painting r safest route But I give up art because they required to draw nude to begin with in college
Now I see why there is such diversity in women swimm sport. You can' t beat those Saudi chicks.
Matthew 5:29-30
29 And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
I mean when it put it that way it almost makes sense.
Not even unpopular or controversial