Sometimes I wonder why its called Great Awakening then, cause the actual "Great Awakening" encompasses all of these topics including all rabbit holes, Wireless Infinite Free energy, Secret Space Programs, Ancient Builder Races, Nephilim, Spiritual awareness, Sacred Geometry, & 5D consciousness.
If we don't allow at least some of this shit, people will get turned off because the name Implies all of these topics are allowed, in a sense.
A document has 17 pages and people get massive boners but don't talk about stuff that might change our understanding of ancient history, energy or anything of consequence.
Right, imagine how boring the board would be too. You need relevant topics and every single stone has to be overturned in regards to every little thing they have been hiding from us.
Take it to c/conspiracies. If you can find research that shows how these space systems are powered, what frequencies or energies or wavelengths they run on, fine, bring it here. But there's literally no proof these systems even exist. And the green Texas lasers thing is pretty easy to understand.
Florida had same lasers and was researched back to a company in Wilmington Delaware. 33 planes 33 employees. Mjtruth posted it today on telegram. We can't close doors on things needing more research. Anons research. That's what we do. If not us then who? I expect the ol dont look here look there from cabal shills. But here? So since you state the green lasers "is pretty easy to understand." then as an Anon you will be enlightening us? Meanwhile I'm going to dig like an Anon. Because I truly am. #NOFEAR
This laser weapon on video below is mounted on the ship, not in the space, but if that’s possible on the ship - we’re not far away to move the technology to the air.
I know the CNN are liars, but why they would lie about this topic?
Yeah there's many people here that think they're awakened because they know about the existence of Q. But talking about aliens is super scary and "fringe". If there's one topic where there's a shitload of good info it's aliens and ufo's.
As to their usage, that is a separate story. But if Iron Beam damages a U.S. jet and a news story gets posted about it and it is removed because "no death ray posts", that will be silly because it was a military event which is as much a Q post as all of the wildfire posts that crop up.
You are correct fren. It is not even very hard to find information about focused laser beams used to destroy.
The problem is that disclosures are coming so fast now that people's heads are starting to spin.
mind-boggling. Far-fetched. Then in 6 months the proof is out there.
Wait. Full stop. The "Iron Beam" system you're referring to is a ground-based laser-based air defense system developed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems in Israel. Unlike traditional missile systems like the Iron Dome, Iron Beam is designed to intercept and destroy short-range threats such as rockets, artillery, and drones using a directed energy weapon, specifically a high-energy laser.
This beam isn't green, and doesn't work in orbit. The system is not deployed at a large scale and only prototypes exist right now. They want to get the system up to 300 kW.
And there's what drives mods nuts. Because a few blue cars and blue roofs in Maui were spared by the fire we have to deal with this looney and unscientific garbage.
A patent is only the recognition of a bright idea as commercial intellectual property, protected by law. It nowhere guarantees actual implementation. It is like stock speculation.
Newly awakening people wanting to know what is going on and what this Q thing is really about come around, see a bunch of flat Earth and space is not real and such nonsense and quickly write it off. That's why this well-poisoning nonsense is discouraged. If anything the way some people keep pushing the DEW shit here hard whenever a fire happens is suspicious in itself as it's a lot simpler and cheaper to just send out some Antifa firebugs.
Antifa bugs would have been seen. And they would need TONS of Antifa bugs.
Antifa bugs may be cheaper to use, but not as effective and precise. I don't even think it's easier. DEWS are easier. There would too much evidence including the individual Antifa bugs running around. They would spend the money on technology that they can use all over the world which also hides in the shadows. They are not going to tell us about what they can and have done. You're not going to find the sauce on the internet. They're not worried about money in the least. In fact, we are paying the government to make and enforce killer shots, pay for their 5 star bunkers, pedophilia, climate change bullshit, depopulation, etc. Even the 9/11 attack and millions of dollars of compensation was paid for by us.
Essentially, at this time in the world we are paying the government to kill us.
DEWS exist. DEWS are not well-poisoning. Nobody is talking about a Death Star from Star Wars or Flat Earth. Even the government publicly acknowledges their existence. Would they tell us about its capabilities or when and where they used it? NO. But there are quite a few smart people on this board that could piece together plausible scenarios, which is better than nothing and may turn out to be completely accurate. So why ban the conversation?
This is specifically related to Q, not all other cross sections on the ven diagram of the matrix they have spun around us. Its just not good optics at the moment with newbies coming in seeing topics like that. The enemy will poison the well on some topics to poison all other interrelated topics. This board is a degree of separation from all other conspiracies not mentioned by Q. And is intended for only things specifically related to Q.
Again, you can discuss all of these fringe conspiracy topics over at conspiracies.win.
If we don't allow at least some of this shit, people will get turned off because the name Implies all of these topics are allowed, in a sense.
Quite the contrary actually. If we open the flood gates and allow fringe conspiracy topics like flat earth, space lasers, and aliens, we will lose progress with a great many fence sitting normies who are on the cusp of awakening.
These topics are weapons of information warfare created by the Cabal to draw attention away from substantive Q based research.
Understandable; they take a magnifying glass to a small group of stupid, gullible assholes and overgeneralize, over-group us with things that seem "Fringe" but yet at one point, EVERY conspiracy was fringe, and Q is Fringe to most, and we cant ignore the fact that the idea of it opens up for more acceptance of things like "Starlink and spaceforce will be monitoring elections". How are space lasers farfetched with things like this in play? Deep state gonna do evil deep state shit.
The idea of an Ion cannon itself is related to all of this anyway, and pushing to the extremes only allows people to warm up to the simple things like "Patriots are in control" much more smoothly.
To me its almost as if yall are saying "You cant talk about Balenciaga because Q never mentioned Balenciaga" The discussions lead to different rabbit holes and different discovery.
Timelines are converging, hidden things will be revealed and Q has made this clear to us that the Great Awakening is upon us. I suggest the Mod team take another look into what exactly the Great Awakening is. This is a place for discussion, not for bans. The roofs that were blue didnt burn and its the deep state that is painting their roofs blue. Dont let this shit turn into Grand Ban Central, or itll be no better than reddit.
In my view, a large part of the problem is that those who take up the "space-based DEW" cudgel have no idea what they are talking about. They pick up uninformed or ill-informed internet buzz and run with it. Contrary to the anon ethic...they do not conduct any research. If they had, they would discover that the history of this technology is at least a half-century old. That various experimental units and devices were involved in test programs. That the largest DEW of all time had been developed, built, tested successfully, and scrapped...all before 10 years ago. They would have learned about the big interest in space-based DEWs during the SDI years of the 1980s---and the realization that such systems were too huge, too complex, too expensive, and too limited to bother with further. And time has marched on as the Air force continues its love affair with shorter wavelengths. Some of these ideas may arise again (though they will still run into the same limitations as before). I'm waiting to see.
But the only informed attitude is one of calm and understanding where we are, not hyperventilation and imagining DEWs under our beds or in orbit.
This comment right here should say enough about why Mods shouldnt make decisions on discussion like Qanaut is trying to do. I think this gives enough reason to allow discussion of laser warfare to cause destruction.
Feel free, but take it to c/conspiracies. If you can find research that shows how these space systems are powered, what frequencies or energies or wavelengths they run on, fine, bring it here, make a high-effort post outlining the entire system and we'll sticky it. But there's literally no proof these systems even exist or are in orbit at all. And the green Texas lasers thing is a pretty easy to understand IQ test.
Maybe by sun, you could see it in Bond movie Die another day hehe.. No srsly you have quite cheap materials with 99,99 % light reflection. With enough surface area, focusing, mirrors, lenses and proper noble gas usage.. who knows.. And we don't really know what they figured out after decades of research. This isn't totally impossible.
So you think that a hypervelocity kinetic energy weapon consisting of 25' long tungsten steel beams (basically telephone poles) weighing around 4 tons each were dropped from space to take out the facility? Just getting that much cargo weight into low-earth orbit borders on impossible even for a rocket as macho as Falcon Heavy-9. Not to mention loading several into a space borne deployment magazine. I'll stick with DEWs which don't need to be in orbit, they can more easily be deployed by plane (SKY) or ship.
Yes. The Delta IV Heavy can launch up to 28,000kg. Falcon Heavy can launch more, but is too new for this program. The theoretical weight of these tungsten rods varies in descriptions of the concept, but a commonly cited figure is around 20 feet in length and about 1 foot in diameter, weighing approximately 9,000 to 12,000 kilograms (20,000 to 26,000 pounds). Obviously such a system could merely be the rod itself, with an RCS guidance package on the end. The theories I've seen states that these rods could be launched individually or in pairs and would orbit (and de-orbit on command) independently.
I'll stick with DEWs which don't need to be in orbit, they can more easily be deployed by plane (SKY) or ship.
You are going by the logical phallacy called "incredulity," where you are choosing the theories that feel "right" to you, rather than the theories that are within our current technological capabilities. For instance, the "airplane laser DEW" program was a total failure. The Boeing 747 is now sitting abandoned and almost totally dismantled in the "Boneyard," at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona.
These Q allusions are not even references. They could mean almost anything. Nothing but confirmation bias to link them to space weapons.
The mountainside collapsed. Due to geologic weakening from repeated underground nuclear detonations, the last one having been 10x greater in yield than anything tested before. I mean, who could'a thunk it?
Still no evidence for "Rods from God." It is a system concept that doesn't make sense, which is why it was only a slide in a briefing package.
The system makes tons of sense. It is within our launch capabilities and tech capabilities, unlike the DEWs, which are proving pretty hard.
The US Navy killed its rail gun. Meahwile, the "airplane laser DEW" program was a total failure. The Boeing 747 is now sitting abandoned and almost totally dismantled in the "Boneyard," at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona. It'll never fly again.
But no, we need magical "space lasers" because Biden "admitted it," LOL. I can't even with this place sometimes.
The Delta IV Heavy can launch up to 28,000kg. Falcon Heavy can launch more, but is too new for this program. The theoretical weight of these tungsten rods varies in descriptions of the concept, but a commonly cited figure is around 20 feet in length and about 1 foot in diameter, weighing approximately 9,000 to 12,000 kilograms (20,000 to 26,000 pounds). Obviously such a system could merely be the rod itself, with an RCS guidance package on the end. The theories I've seen states that these rods could be launched individually or in pairs and would orbit (and de-orbit on command) independently.
I am pretty sure the 'owners' of the property in Maui burned the property down to get rid of the renters and leasers who had fixed rental rates. Now, when the property owners rebuild their property they can charge a lot more rent.
I have seen this happen a couple of times on the beaches in Mexico, when someone comes along and makes a better offer for the property than the current residents.
And yes the death rays discussion distracts from what is really happening.
Some people jump to the most outrageous things when it's more likely they just used paid arsonists. It's like the ones who keep trying to claim that the WTC towers were taken down by space lasers when we know major renovations in the elevator shafts by a shady company happened months earlier and that is a perfect place to hide remote-controlled explosives and the buildings went down exactly as an implosion a beam coming from above would have looked very different than floors blowing in sequence.
Wow, I can't believe you're getting down voted for presenting such rational theory. People on this board are not using their brains.
Imagine believing that the Dept of Defense has spent trillions and trillions of dollars and decades of research to deploy DEW that can burn anything from space except the color blue.
I suppose that could be the case, but it doesn't really make much sense since once the fires were rampaging through Maui there's no way to prevent embers, and nearby fires from igniting those blue roofs. The high winds were a factor in these fires being so bad, blue roofs wouldn't stop the fire from spreading the traditional way, but METAL ROOFS WOULD.
Metal roofs are much more likely to be painted blue.
Wow, thanks for this! I didn't even look into this subject, but this is very interesting.
What if the actor that plays Joe Biden is trying to give people a hint on how to protect themselves and then on this "elite research board" the mods are preventing us from looking into this more deeply.
That's the state of the mods, apparently - prejudice based opinions, not looking from all angles. We all fall into that trap from time to time. Glad you went back and reviewed the comment again, fren. I'm not saying any of it is true but definitely worth looking into. I've seen plenty of evidences already, just not in the habit of tracking them. Those videos are from just a quick search.
Metal conducts heat much better and of course heats up faster than wood, especially if the wood has any water absorbed into the surface from recent rain.
Cite one Q post that discusses adrenochrome? You can't find one but it's discussed on here all the time. There's a lot of things Q hasn't openly discussed, actually most things. Although he has alluded to some things, see my Q drops above where he says; SKY_BEAM_OK -- NORTH_TRADE_OK -- MOUNTAIN_DEEP_OK. That drop was just before the North Korean nuke research facility located deep inside a mountain just blew up.
Looks like you don't believe in energy weapons and you don't want them talked about here. Personally I know they exist, we've had them on ships and planes for a while. Whether there's one in orbit I don't know but discussing it on here is not very far fetched.
Developed under a 2018 contract with Lockheed, the HELIOS consists of a 60-kilowatt laser and optical dazzler package designed to knock out unmanned aerial vehicles, “burn the boats”
I'm sorry to start this reply with such a negative tone, frog, but, this is such basic level research and frankly rather embarrassing to even read for someone that well understands these Systems. My goodness gracious this is some weak logic. For instance:
The Navy has now taken possession of a half-dozen new laser weapons for integration onto surface warships, officials said on Wednesday.
The HELIOS program is a ship based "point defense" system, not a space-based green laser. "yEaH, bUt tHeY CoUlD PuT It iN SpAcE" — OK, then explain how it was was installed into the 16-foot wide payload bay and launched on the Delta IV Heavy rocket, which has a max payload of 28,000 KG??
Bring that here to this WIN and I'll sticky it. And make you a mod.
You know that the bulk of the HELIOS system is its massive cooling system, right? Detecting an object this hot in space would a pretty simple matter using an infrared (IR) telescope or sensor capable of picking up thermal emissions from high altitudes. Amateur ground astronomers would simply scan the sky for over-flies of extremely hot objects, then extrapolate and track the satellite's orbit to predict its path across the sky for targeted observation. And yet we have no photos of this? Why? And with no evidence, you believe there are platforms in orbit that can burn small communities undetected??
The US Air Force airborne laser, (ABL), designated YAL-1A, is a high-energy laser weapon system.
How are you even citing this? Every airplane geek knows that this program was a total failure. The Boeing 747 is now sitting abandoned and almost totally dismantled in the "Boneyard," at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona.
About the program, from the AI (and I know these things before I go to the AI, BTW, I just tell it what to research and how long I want the results to be to save me typing):
The US Air Force's Airborne Laser (ABL), designated YAL-1A, was an ambitious high-energy laser weapon system mounted on a modified Boeing 747. Designed to intercept and destroy tactical ballistic missiles at long ranges using a powerful laser, the ABL took on a significant challenge in directed energy weapons technology. Despite its innovative approach and the successful demonstration of its capabilities in tests, however, the ABL program faced significant challenges related to feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and operational practicality. Ultimately, these challenges led to the discontinuation of the program, and the program was deemed a failure.
Despite demonstrating the ability to shoot down missiles in tests, the program could not overcome the significant challenges associated with operational deployment, including the laser's range, atmospheric conditions affecting laser performance, and the high costs of operation and maintenance. As a result, the U.S. Department of Defense decided to discontinue the ABL program, redirecting its focus and resources towards more feasible missile defense solutions.
They couldn't get it to work. And yet we're supposed to believe they have orbiting platforms that can vaporize small towns, and NO ONE in this entire thread has posted anything even close to that.
Death ray posts belong on conspiracies.win, not on a Q research board.
The simplest explanation for an event is often the most logical. Roof color in no way indicates the use of "death rays."
Organized terrorist cells of arsonists can easily distinguish different houses for targeted destruction.
While the gullible eat up stories about death rays, the terrorist cells crossing our southern border go unnoticed.
Sometimes I wonder why its called Great Awakening then, cause the actual "Great Awakening" encompasses all of these topics including all rabbit holes, Wireless Infinite Free energy, Secret Space Programs, Ancient Builder Races, Nephilim, Spiritual awareness, Sacred Geometry, & 5D consciousness.
If we don't allow at least some of this shit, people will get turned off because the name Implies all of these topics are allowed, in a sense.
Edit: Yall would stop at 69 updoots XD
A document has 17 pages and people get massive boners but don't talk about stuff that might change our understanding of ancient history, energy or anything of consequence.
Right, imagine how boring the board would be too. You need relevant topics and every single stone has to be overturned in regards to every little thing they have been hiding from us.
Take it to c/conspiracies. If you can find research that shows how these space systems are powered, what frequencies or energies or wavelengths they run on, fine, bring it here. But there's literally no proof these systems even exist. And the green Texas lasers thing is pretty easy to understand.
Florida had same lasers and was researched back to a company in Wilmington Delaware. 33 planes 33 employees. Mjtruth posted it today on telegram. We can't close doors on things needing more research. Anons research. That's what we do. If not us then who? I expect the ol dont look here look there from cabal shills. But here? So since you state the green lasers "is pretty easy to understand." then as an Anon you will be enlightening us? Meanwhile I'm going to dig like an Anon. Because I truly am. #NOFEAR
I haven't even looked into Texas lasers nor ever made any claims about them.
This laser weapon on video below is mounted on the ship, not in the space, but if that’s possible on the ship - we’re not far away to move the technology to the air.
I know the CNN are liars, but why they would lie about this topic?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyUh_xSjvXQ
I miss voat. It was a free speech Wild West but at least you knew there was free speech
Unless you can somehow tie the space lasers to big foot and nephilim giants, or whatever those things are even called….
Then cats will be sure to sticky 🤣
Yeah there's many people here that think they're awakened because they know about the existence of Q. But talking about aliens is super scary and "fringe". If there's one topic where there's a shitload of good info it's aliens and ufo's.
Aliens are probably closer to a Q topic specifically because there is a direct reference.
But I will reiterate -- once again -- that directed energy weapons specifically are not a "conspiracy theory", they are a known fact.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Beam
As to their usage, that is a separate story. But if Iron Beam damages a U.S. jet and a news story gets posted about it and it is removed because "no death ray posts", that will be silly because it was a military event which is as much a Q post as all of the wildfire posts that crop up.
You are correct fren. It is not even very hard to find information about focused laser beams used to destroy. The problem is that disclosures are coming so fast now that people's heads are starting to spin.
mind-boggling. Far-fetched. Then in 6 months the proof is out there.
Wait. Full stop. The "Iron Beam" system you're referring to is a ground-based laser-based air defense system developed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems in Israel. Unlike traditional missile systems like the Iron Dome, Iron Beam is designed to intercept and destroy short-range threats such as rockets, artillery, and drones using a directed energy weapon, specifically a high-energy laser.
This beam isn't green, and doesn't work in orbit. The system is not deployed at a large scale and only prototypes exist right now. They want to get the system up to 300 kW.
And there's what drives mods nuts. Because a few blue cars and blue roofs in Maui were spared by the fire we have to deal with this looney and unscientific garbage.
and patented geo-engineering
A patent is only the recognition of a bright idea as commercial intellectual property, protected by law. It nowhere guarantees actual implementation. It is like stock speculation.
Newly awakening people wanting to know what is going on and what this Q thing is really about come around, see a bunch of flat Earth and space is not real and such nonsense and quickly write it off. That's why this well-poisoning nonsense is discouraged. If anything the way some people keep pushing the DEW shit here hard whenever a fire happens is suspicious in itself as it's a lot simpler and cheaper to just send out some Antifa firebugs.
Antifa bugs would have been seen. And they would need TONS of Antifa bugs.
Antifa bugs may be cheaper to use, but not as effective and precise. I don't even think it's easier. DEWS are easier. There would too much evidence including the individual Antifa bugs running around. They would spend the money on technology that they can use all over the world which also hides in the shadows. They are not going to tell us about what they can and have done. You're not going to find the sauce on the internet. They're not worried about money in the least. In fact, we are paying the government to make and enforce killer shots, pay for their 5 star bunkers, pedophilia, climate change bullshit, depopulation, etc. Even the 9/11 attack and millions of dollars of compensation was paid for by us.
Essentially, at this time in the world we are paying the government to kill us.
DEWS exist. DEWS are not well-poisoning. Nobody is talking about a Death Star from Star Wars or Flat Earth. Even the government publicly acknowledges their existence. Would they tell us about its capabilities or when and where they used it? NO. But there are quite a few smart people on this board that could piece together plausible scenarios, which is better than nothing and may turn out to be completely accurate. So why ban the conversation?
over the target
This is specifically related to Q, not all other cross sections on the ven diagram of the matrix they have spun around us. Its just not good optics at the moment with newbies coming in seeing topics like that. The enemy will poison the well on some topics to poison all other interrelated topics. This board is a degree of separation from all other conspiracies not mentioned by Q. And is intended for only things specifically related to Q.
I'll just leave this here 4 u
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d9/Great_Awakening_Map_.jpg
This is a Q related sub. Not all those items on that graphic are Q related.
This! I was thinking if this when I wrote my previous statement!
Again, you can discuss all of these fringe conspiracy topics over at conspiracies.win.
Quite the contrary actually. If we open the flood gates and allow fringe conspiracy topics like flat earth, space lasers, and aliens, we will lose progress with a great many fence sitting normies who are on the cusp of awakening.
These topics are weapons of information warfare created by the Cabal to draw attention away from substantive Q based research.
But they do exist - DEW’s
It’s not a conspiracy. It’s a fact.
https://www.nre.navy.mil/organization/departments/aviation-force-projection-and-integrated-defense/aerospace-science-research-351/directed-energy-weapons-high-power-microwaves#:~:text=Directed%20energy%20weapons%20(DEWs)%20are,or%20destroys%20an%20adversarial%20capability.
It's not our goal to awaken normies to the existence of Q. Normies need to be scared and brought to the precipice so that they change their ways.
We're not meant to comfort the normies by telling them all is fine and they don't have to do shit because the military has got their back.
Well, that's the current stage, yes
Understandable; they take a magnifying glass to a small group of stupid, gullible assholes and overgeneralize, over-group us with things that seem "Fringe" but yet at one point, EVERY conspiracy was fringe, and Q is Fringe to most, and we cant ignore the fact that the idea of it opens up for more acceptance of things like "Starlink and spaceforce will be monitoring elections". How are space lasers farfetched with things like this in play? Deep state gonna do evil deep state shit. The idea of an Ion cannon itself is related to all of this anyway, and pushing to the extremes only allows people to warm up to the simple things like "Patriots are in control" much more smoothly.
To me its almost as if yall are saying "You cant talk about Balenciaga because Q never mentioned Balenciaga" The discussions lead to different rabbit holes and different discovery.
Timelines are converging, hidden things will be revealed and Q has made this clear to us that the Great Awakening is upon us. I suggest the Mod team take another look into what exactly the Great Awakening is. This is a place for discussion, not for bans. The roofs that were blue didnt burn and its the deep state that is painting their roofs blue. Dont let this shit turn into Grand Ban Central, or itll be no better than reddit.
PizzaGate is most definitely on Q.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d9/Great_Awakening_Map_.jpg
Agreed.
In my view, a large part of the problem is that those who take up the "space-based DEW" cudgel have no idea what they are talking about. They pick up uninformed or ill-informed internet buzz and run with it. Contrary to the anon ethic...they do not conduct any research. If they had, they would discover that the history of this technology is at least a half-century old. That various experimental units and devices were involved in test programs. That the largest DEW of all time had been developed, built, tested successfully, and scrapped...all before 10 years ago. They would have learned about the big interest in space-based DEWs during the SDI years of the 1980s---and the realization that such systems were too huge, too complex, too expensive, and too limited to bother with further. And time has marched on as the Air force continues its love affair with shorter wavelengths. Some of these ideas may arise again (though they will still run into the same limitations as before). I'm waiting to see.
But the only informed attitude is one of calm and understanding where we are, not hyperventilation and imagining DEWs under our beds or in orbit.
Things that were supposedly "discontinued" were not, though. Saying they were was a smokescreen to divert attention.
I'd call it Q research.
Remember this on April 26, 2018?
Scientists suspect mountain collapse at N. Korea nuke test site
And this just before that on Feb. 10, 2018
beam of LIGHT
u/#q703
And SKY_BEAM_OK
u/#q756
This comment right here should say enough about why Mods shouldnt make decisions on discussion like Qanaut is trying to do. I think this gives enough reason to allow discussion of laser warfare to cause destruction.
/u/Qanauat
^^^^^
Feel free, but take it to c/conspiracies. If you can find research that shows how these space systems are powered, what frequencies or energies or wavelengths they run on, fine, bring it here, make a high-effort post outlining the entire system and we'll sticky it. But there's literally no proof these systems even exist or are in orbit at all. And the green Texas lasers thing is a pretty easy to understand IQ test.
Maybe by sun, you could see it in Bond movie Die another day hehe.. No srsly you have quite cheap materials with 99,99 % light reflection. With enough surface area, focusing, mirrors, lenses and proper noble gas usage.. who knows.. And we don't really know what they figured out after decades of research. This isn't totally impossible.
So you're positing a space-based system able to collapse a MOUNTAIN and kill 200 scientists?? That's seriously what you're going with...?
I think that incident by the way was indeed the "Rods from God" system, tho.
So you think that a hypervelocity kinetic energy weapon consisting of 25' long tungsten steel beams (basically telephone poles) weighing around 4 tons each were dropped from space to take out the facility? Just getting that much cargo weight into low-earth orbit borders on impossible even for a rocket as macho as Falcon Heavy-9. Not to mention loading several into a space borne deployment magazine. I'll stick with DEWs which don't need to be in orbit, they can more easily be deployed by plane (SKY) or ship.
Yes. The Delta IV Heavy can launch up to 28,000kg. Falcon Heavy can launch more, but is too new for this program. The theoretical weight of these tungsten rods varies in descriptions of the concept, but a commonly cited figure is around 20 feet in length and about 1 foot in diameter, weighing approximately 9,000 to 12,000 kilograms (20,000 to 26,000 pounds). Obviously such a system could merely be the rod itself, with an RCS guidance package on the end. The theories I've seen states that these rods could be launched individually or in pairs and would orbit (and de-orbit on command) independently.
You are going by the logical phallacy called "incredulity," where you are choosing the theories that feel "right" to you, rather than the theories that are within our current technological capabilities. For instance, the "airplane laser DEW" program was a total failure. The Boeing 747 is now sitting abandoned and almost totally dismantled in the "Boneyard," at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona.
But no, we need magical "skyships," LOL.
These Q allusions are not even references. They could mean almost anything. Nothing but confirmation bias to link them to space weapons.
The mountainside collapsed. Due to geologic weakening from repeated underground nuclear detonations, the last one having been 10x greater in yield than anything tested before. I mean, who could'a thunk it?
Still no evidence for "Rods from God." It is a system concept that doesn't make sense, which is why it was only a slide in a briefing package.
The system makes tons of sense. It is within our launch capabilities and tech capabilities, unlike the DEWs, which are proving pretty hard.
The US Navy killed its rail gun. Meahwile, the "airplane laser DEW" program was a total failure. The Boeing 747 is now sitting abandoned and almost totally dismantled in the "Boneyard," at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona. It'll never fly again.
But no, we need magical "space lasers" because Biden "admitted it," LOL. I can't even with this place sometimes.
The Delta IV Heavy can launch up to 28,000kg. Falcon Heavy can launch more, but is too new for this program. The theoretical weight of these tungsten rods varies in descriptions of the concept, but a commonly cited figure is around 20 feet in length and about 1 foot in diameter, weighing approximately 9,000 to 12,000 kilograms (20,000 to 26,000 pounds). Obviously such a system could merely be the rod itself, with an RCS guidance package on the end. The theories I've seen states that these rods could be launched individually or in pairs and would orbit (and de-orbit on command) independently.
What? You think Rods from God are real? I find that strangely reassuring.
I think there is evidence for them having been used twice
I am pretty sure the 'owners' of the property in Maui burned the property down to get rid of the renters and leasers who had fixed rental rates. Now, when the property owners rebuild their property they can charge a lot more rent.
I have seen this happen a couple of times on the beaches in Mexico, when someone comes along and makes a better offer for the property than the current residents.
And yes the death rays discussion distracts from what is really happening.
Some people jump to the most outrageous things when it's more likely they just used paid arsonists. It's like the ones who keep trying to claim that the WTC towers were taken down by space lasers when we know major renovations in the elevator shafts by a shady company happened months earlier and that is a perfect place to hide remote-controlled explosives and the buildings went down exactly as an implosion a beam coming from above would have looked very different than floors blowing in sequence.
Wow, I can't believe you're getting down voted for presenting such rational theory. People on this board are not using their brains.
Imagine believing that the Dept of Defense has spent trillions and trillions of dollars and decades of research to deploy DEW that can burn anything from space except the color blue.
Have you not thought that perhaps that way they wouldn’t burn down certain targets? Like the celebrities HAVING BLUE ROOFS
Many of the pictures of houses with blue roofs turned out to be buildings that weren't even on Maui.
I suppose that could be the case, but it doesn't really make much sense since once the fires were rampaging through Maui there's no way to prevent embers, and nearby fires from igniting those blue roofs. The high winds were a factor in these fires being so bad, blue roofs wouldn't stop the fire from spreading the traditional way, but METAL ROOFS WOULD.
Metal roofs are much more likely to be painted blue.
"Lasers bounce off the blue color" - not sure if its true or not.
This one seems legit though - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTd1T-p9Xoc
Wow, thanks for this! I didn't even look into this subject, but this is very interesting.
What if the actor that plays Joe Biden is trying to give people a hint on how to protect themselves and then on this "elite research board" the mods are preventing us from looking into this more deeply.
That video shows like 1.5 seconds of hitting blue, that doesn't mean anything.
Edit: Did not even notice the second video when I posted, how the heck did my eyes glaze over there?
That's the state of the mods, apparently - prejudice based opinions, not looking from all angles. We all fall into that trap from time to time. Glad you went back and reviewed the comment again, fren. I'm not saying any of it is true but definitely worth looking into. I've seen plenty of evidences already, just not in the habit of tracking them. Those videos are from just a quick search.
Whilst looking back at your post history you post plenty of NON Q research crapola on this board?
Except, it's a fact, that the technology exists. So, it can't be a conspiracy if it's a fact. Checkmate.
What about photos of fence posts where the screws heat up to a certain temp but the wood doesn't burn?
Metal conducts heat much better and of course heats up faster than wood, especially if the wood has any water absorbed into the surface from recent rain.
One of the first 100 points by Q was about the border.
u/#q85
Your name checks out.
Q references terrorists in many posts.
Q post 4354 discusses ANTIFA as an organized group of domestic terrorists.
u/#q4354
. . . and again in post 4644
u/#q4644
Cite one Q post that discusses space lasers.
Cite one Q post that discusses adrenochrome? You can't find one but it's discussed on here all the time. There's a lot of things Q hasn't openly discussed, actually most things. Although he has alluded to some things, see my Q drops above where he says; SKY_BEAM_OK -- NORTH_TRADE_OK -- MOUNTAIN_DEEP_OK. That drop was just before the North Korean nuke research facility located deep inside a mountain just blew up.
Looks like you don't believe in energy weapons and you don't want them talked about here. Personally I know they exist, we've had them on ships and planes for a while. Whether there's one in orbit I don't know but discussing it on here is not very far fetched.
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/directed-energy.html
The US Air Force airborne laser, (ABL), designated YAL-1A, is a high-energy laser weapon system.
The Navy has now taken possession of a half-dozen new laser weapons for integration onto surface warships, officials said on Wednesday.
I'm sorry to start this reply with such a negative tone, frog, but, this is such basic level research and frankly rather embarrassing to even read for someone that well understands these Systems. My goodness gracious this is some weak logic. For instance:
The HELIOS program is a ship based "point defense" system, not a space-based green laser. "yEaH, bUt tHeY CoUlD PuT It iN SpAcE" — OK, then explain how it was was installed into the 16-foot wide payload bay and launched on the Delta IV Heavy rocket, which has a max payload of 28,000 KG??
Bring that here to this WIN and I'll sticky it. And make you a mod.
You know that the bulk of the HELIOS system is its massive cooling system, right? Detecting an object this hot in space would a pretty simple matter using an infrared (IR) telescope or sensor capable of picking up thermal emissions from high altitudes. Amateur ground astronomers would simply scan the sky for over-flies of extremely hot objects, then extrapolate and track the satellite's orbit to predict its path across the sky for targeted observation. And yet we have no photos of this? Why? And with no evidence, you believe there are platforms in orbit that can burn small communities undetected??
How are you even citing this? Every airplane geek knows that this program was a total failure. The Boeing 747 is now sitting abandoned and almost totally dismantled in the "Boneyard," at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona.
About the program, from the AI (and I know these things before I go to the AI, BTW, I just tell it what to research and how long I want the results to be to save me typing):
They couldn't get it to work. And yet we're supposed to believe they have orbiting platforms that can vaporize small towns, and NO ONE in this entire thread has posted anything even close to that.
Yeah. Qanaut needs to take a hike.
Now just to be an asshole
Q calls them domestic terrorists he doesn’t my mention them crossing the border.
If you’re going to make a statement and use evidence to back it up it would help if the evidence actually matched the statement you made.
Well, Trump has also referenced terrorists crossing the border so that lines up.
Asshole? No.
Overtly obtuse? Yes.
u/#processing
I think he's trolling ya tbh m8