Also the face keeps doing some possible weird lens thing, maybe computerized distortion.
I agree that generally speaking the video seems way too clear to be him.
Some red flags were going off watching it like that. Maybe it is an AI video, maybe it is real, maybe it is faked with the creators laughing...
I found it weird that the guy filming it felt the need to direct the way he spoke instead of just asking clarifying questions. Almost felt like a clown produced film.
Yes, the interviewer is quite disturbing. Doesn’t let the person speak freely, like if he planned to cut the interview into smaller pieces, but then what’s the value of an interview if small parts are cut without the context.
I also noticed that the eyeglasses change their size and it’s hard to explain it by him moving them as his hand was too far at that time.
Her previous movie - Black Widow, was a fantastic Mk Ultra movie. If you are trying to tell some frens what MK Ultra is, show them that movie and you dont even have to explain anything.
This is one of the posts when I have to recall Q saying: Disinformation is necessary.
How big was the landing device?
Had it enough fuel and energy to leave Moon and head to the earth? The Escape Velocity for Moon is 2.38 km/s = 8568 km/h.
Was the landing device strong enough NOT to burn in the Earth’s atmosphere the way meteorites (made of stones and metals) burn before they get to the ground?
Is he the one in blue or the one in yellow? Will both characters have a penis or only the woman? This can't be a romantic story or one of them would be black.
Utter bullshit to further muddy the waters, whatever the truth may be. A truth or lie, they simply dont care as long as the narrative causes confusion, chaos and division.
This is how they control us.
We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false
Citation:
William J. Casey, 1913-1987, Director, CIA (Republican), Statement at his first CIA staff meeting, 1981
You can believe what you want, but this is a Q-focused board, and pushing that stuff on others with the same religious zeal that trannies and lgtpdqzyx-ers utilize is the single biggest mistake that's always made. Obnoxious zealotry is fatal to any cause, evidence notwithstanding.
Fair enough. There are other places for that, though. I think we tend to get sidetracked from the main focus when something extremely polarizing gets forcefully pushed in an area where it doesn't belong, such as a Q-focused board. This topic, and others (flat Earth, for instance), also tend to be binary in nature and don't ever seem to be open to debate by those who believe such things.
I used flat Earth as an example, as it's another belief that is zealously pushed and applied in a binary manner. My emphasis, and hence my point, was the zealotry applied to such topics, rather than my opinion on them, as well as the topic of this particular board, which is Q. My opinion of said topics has no bearing on the point of this discussion, and the irony of pointing out my so-called "lumping" made me chuckle a bit.
You are unable to make a distinction between don't talk about something and don't believe something.
If you visit dragracing.win and get banned because all you want to do is post about knitting, it was because you're muddying up the forum with off-topic bullshit. Not because the people on the forum hate knitting.
And then, after being told to go to knitting.win with other like-minded forum users, you refuse for some inexplicable reason.
It's not because your topic is verboten, it's because it's off-topic. Not to mention hyperbolic, nobody ever got banned here for saying they think the moon landing is fake.
It looks OK, except for the completely-unbelievable part where she wouldn't notice an open flame inches from her face in the first scene. Also why wouldn't they just posit that the did hire Kubrick?
Soft disclosure
At the end of the clip where she says “we should have gotten Kubrick”.
https://yandex.com/video/preview/4629184359797787059
thats_the_joke.png
Exactly. Slight of hand distraction and admittance at the same time. Tell me the truth without telling me.
Is this a real video of Kubrick?
The quality seems to be too good to be real, considering the time he lived. Died in 1999.
This is the TV news from 1999 announcing his death. The quality is way worse than the interview above: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-OB6Q0fotk
Why we can’t see his whole face?
Can it be fake?
Very good question. I leave that for viewers to decide. It is an unusual video to be sure. But there’s also Buzz: https://yandex.com/video/preview/14386801633012679265
Also the face keeps doing some possible weird lens thing, maybe computerized distortion.
I agree that generally speaking the video seems way too clear to be him.
Some red flags were going off watching it like that. Maybe it is an AI video, maybe it is real, maybe it is faked with the creators laughing...
I found it weird that the guy filming it felt the need to direct the way he spoke instead of just asking clarifying questions. Almost felt like a clown produced film.
Yes, the interviewer is quite disturbing. Doesn’t let the person speak freely, like if he planned to cut the interview into smaller pieces, but then what’s the value of an interview if small parts are cut without the context.
I also noticed that the eyeglasses change their size and it’s hard to explain it by him moving them as his hand was too far at that time.
My thoughts too.
Meaning C|A / Hollywood is softly telling you the truth?
LMAO
Jest all you want can't shake my faith of who is in control
exactly^ it's the only way that makes sense, plus you can see Q's humor...🐸
Do you mean, the CIA is in control, as in, Satan runs Hollywood? Or do you mean.... GENESIS 1:6-8, wink, wink
Then what did you want soft disclosure to mean
Her previous movie - Black Widow, was a fantastic Mk Ultra movie. If you are trying to tell some frens what MK Ultra is, show them that movie and you dont even have to explain anything.
I am hoping this one will be similar as well.
I always wondered why Trump has made Steven Mnuchin a Secretary of Treasury. A guy from Hollywood? Why?
Maybe because many movies were going to be produced with the intention to prepare the normies for multiple reveals.
u/#q2225
This is one of the posts when I have to recall Q saying: Disinformation is necessary.
How big was the landing device?
Had it enough fuel and energy to leave Moon and head to the earth? The Escape Velocity for Moon is 2.38 km/s = 8568 km/h.
Was the landing device strong enough NOT to burn in the Earth’s atmosphere the way meteorites (made of stones and metals) burn before they get to the ground?
More bullshit from Hollyweird.
The C|A just can't stop killing JFK.
Amen.
THEY WENT TO THE MOON AGAIN!!!! USA, USA, usa, usa ......
LOL
"Fly Me To The Moon" -- wasn't that the song used in the video that mentioned the Ghost Army?
Yes
Is he the one in blue or the one in yellow? Will both characters have a penis or only the woman? This can't be a romantic story or one of them would be black.
Have you ever been picked put by the FUZZ, well they're right outside now. (Fuzz = police in case you're too young;-)
They can eat shit and die. That's my thought about that.
How can anyone have seen it if it comes out in July? Asking forafren
Yeah , you're right. I suppose I should have worded it differently!
Kek I was being a dork. Trailer looks like it will be a blockbuster. And it's got woody!
Utter bullshit to further muddy the waters, whatever the truth may be. A truth or lie, they simply dont care as long as the narrative causes confusion, chaos and division.
This is how they control us.
Citation:
William J. Casey, 1913-1987, Director, CIA (Republican), Statement at his first CIA staff meeting, 1981
Eigen's Political and Historical Quotations
Now I suddenly have the urge to listen to Sinatra and Rat Pack songs.
The best time for music. But all those people were compromised.
Sorry but ugh.
Oh , I concur!
Bringing things back to reality ..... Q said the earth isn't flat.
The rabbit holes associated with this board make looking into other rabbit holes inevitable.
The JFK Jr / Vincent fusca rabbit hole is extremely interesting still to consider.
I believe there's junk inside of Q meant to throw ppl off of the scent. It's gold dust.
If Q comes out as a flat earther. Hes immediately dismissed.
So I imo there's some lies guarding the "truthful" Q posts
(Deleted)
You're not allowed to believe that on this website. That is heresy and you are a heretic unless you believe the official story.
You can believe what you want, but this is a Q-focused board, and pushing that stuff on others with the same religious zeal that trannies and lgtpdqzyx-ers utilize is the single biggest mistake that's always made. Obnoxious zealotry is fatal to any cause, evidence notwithstanding.
Fair enough. There are other places for that, though. I think we tend to get sidetracked from the main focus when something extremely polarizing gets forcefully pushed in an area where it doesn't belong, such as a Q-focused board. This topic, and others (flat Earth, for instance), also tend to be binary in nature and don't ever seem to be open to debate by those who believe such things.
I used flat Earth as an example, as it's another belief that is zealously pushed and applied in a binary manner. My emphasis, and hence my point, was the zealotry applied to such topics, rather than my opinion on them, as well as the topic of this particular board, which is Q. My opinion of said topics has no bearing on the point of this discussion, and the irony of pointing out my so-called "lumping" made me chuckle a bit.
You are unable to make a distinction between don't talk about something and don't believe something.
If you visit dragracing.win and get banned because all you want to do is post about knitting, it was because you're muddying up the forum with off-topic bullshit. Not because the people on the forum hate knitting.
And then, after being told to go to knitting.win with other like-minded forum users, you refuse for some inexplicable reason.
It's not because your topic is verboten, it's because it's off-topic. Not to mention hyperbolic, nobody ever got banned here for saying they think the moon landing is fake.
That's what they say in the movie. It's about faking the moon landing.
Nope! very few people will watch this. Starting with me.
It’s gonna be framed so silly that anyone who makes the claim it was faked will be ridiculed
It already DO be like that.
Just like it is with Muh pandemic and safe & effective. YOU’RE the crazy one for asking logical questions instead of just blindly believing.
You can bet your bottom devalued dollar that nothing from earth has ever touched the lunar surface.
It looks OK, except for the completely-unbelievable part where she wouldn't notice an open flame inches from her face in the first scene. Also why wouldn't they just posit that the did hire Kubrick?
They probably couldn’t get approval from Kubricks estate
Thanks, reminded me to get more Gme and Djt
Fly arrrested leftie “elite”Larps in a DEI boeing to Gbay
This is a flat earther’s wet dream 😂
Flop. Calling it now.
Great timing! Remember that great actor OJ Simpson playing an astronaut in the faked Mars landing 'Capricorn One'?