I sincerely hope that the Normies can finally figure out that whatever tech gets introduced to the civilians, the US MCIC has had it for at least 25 yrs before it goes public. In some cases, these technologies have been around for 50+ yrs.
My theory is that we've had this stuff much, much, much longer than that. Possibly thousands of years, and that civilization gets "reset" every couple hundred years.
Think about it for a bit. Every major invention seemed to have happened in the past couple hundred years. Yet nothing modern could possibly make the pyramids, as the most obvious example. Where is that tech?
Most of our conversations right now are on digital media. This thread right here, and my post responding to it, are on digital media. If the internet goes down permanently, this section of history will be mostly as well. Gone, except in books and memories.
If there is a major fallout that kills 95% of humanity, and the rest are busy trying to survive and repopulate, then within just a few generations it'll be a whole new batch of people to give tech to and let them think they invented it themselves. A new cycle.
How would we ever know? How would future generations know? Even if we printed this entire thread out, what are the chances it gets into the hands of someone 500 years later after civilization has collapsed and the cycle renewed yet again? Future generations will think they invented the internet, just like we currently believe we invented the internet less than 50 years ago. But none of this internet will make it into theirs 500 years from now.
EDIT: Look up OOParts on your favorite search engine. Leads credibility to this theory.
We can't build the old church's either. We are a traumatized civilization of a past reset. It seems like it may have happened in the late 1700's or early 1800's. Towns and buildings are founded and orphans were called foundlings.
Please name some of "these technologies." The way we have such things for 50+ years is because they have been available for 50+ years, and we know about them.
Correct. They've been working on it since they found the "bell" after WW2. As well, the military have openly admitted a few times that they are 25-40 years ahead in technology than the public is made aware of.
Example : UFO's.
Did you know the most commonly reported 'UFO' between the late 40's to the mid 80's? A triangle. What aircraft did the USA debut to the world in the late 80's? Two flying triangles, the F-117 and the B2
An absolute big nothing. Only rumor and speculation. I read a book all about it, and it came down to hints, "someone said," and sheer fantasy. No photos. No diagrams. No reports. No witnesses.
The F-117 and B-2 are far from triangles. You would have better luck with the F-102 and F-106, which had delta wings. And they are all far from UFOs. The projected A-12 Avenger II "flying dorito" was a literal triangle (but was never built).
"The flying machine of the future my flying machine will be heavier than air, but it will not be an aeroplane. It will have no wings. It will be substantial, solid, stable. You cannot have a stable airplane."
"My flying machine will have neither wings nor propellers. You might see it on the ground and you would never guess that it was a flying machine. Yet it will be able to move at will through the air in any direction with perfect safety"
IT's horrendous to me that we still fly around in dangerous airplanes, and helicopters that kill some of our best people.
And Tesla had no flying machine. Nothing easier than to talk about than dreams. Tesla was a great inventor, and his inventions are firmly within the laws of physics, but he was also a grandiose self-promoter. Many of his prophecies came to nothing.
Get lost DeathyRayDesigner. We've done this dance twice already. It's my contention that your close minded about this and a fat headed stubborn bastard. So why bother coming in threads like this? it's clear you have zero intention to have an open minded discussion. Seems your just here to be the biggest brain in the room, and tell everyone how wrong they are. So why bother coming into a thread like this, is it just to feel better about your EGO. There's no way you could be wrong about nature of electricity and physics? right? You're smarter than Nikola Tesla right? Just head on over r/physics and discuss over there with people more like you.
Tesla absolutely envisioned this FLYING MACHINE, just like he envisioned the rotating magnetic field in his visions, and knew it would work before he even built it. That's how Teslas brain worked. When Tesla says the product of his dreams is a flying machine that doesn't work on the standard principles of FLIGHT, he's not talking about some grandiose nonsense, it was the product of his dreams as he stated.
Everything Tesla worked towards was to make his DREAM the flying machine he envisioned a reality. The wireless power system he invented (which I know you don't believe existed) was only invented so he could power his flying machine from the ground.
The universe is electric, as is the Sun. The Sun is not powered by a thermonuclear reaction like we've all been told. Momentum can be created electrically, and inertia can be cancelled electrically. Tesla knew this intuitively as I know it intuitively. You don't know it intuitively, because you're a monkey.
I have read books on Tesla, with admiration and some understanding, since I have a 50-year background in aerospace engineering. i am by no means close-minded, but I do have a realistic perspective. i "bother" coming into threads like this because I am dissatisfied with people getting all worked up over the kind and speed of sleigh that Santa Claus rides in.
There is never any new evidence to consider. The whole field of quantum physics, semiconductors, and lasers emerged and elaborated entirely outside of Tesla's thinking. So, it is evidence that he surely didn't think of everything. And just because he was right about rotating electric fields doesn't prove he is right about anything else. It is a logical fallacy to believe so. (He totally discounted quantum physics, which goes to show how close-minded and incorrect he could be.)
Here you claim that the product of Tesla's dreams is not grandiose nonsense. You saying so is at least grandiose nonsense. I've had dreams, too. None of them have come real.
What wireless power system? There is simply no evidence of anything working. The Wardenclyffe tower was never explained by Tesla and he was never able to bring it to fruition. It died in obscurity. Tesla was not able to convince his benefactor to keep pouring money into it. The benefactor was open-minded enough and respectful of Tesla enough to start the project---but Tesla was at a loss for words to justify any further investment. His fault, not the benefactor's.
Yeah, the sun is powered by thermonuclear reactions. The theory explains a whole lot of astronomic physics. It also has electrical properties, best explained by Laszlo Kortvelyessy in his book, "The Electric Universe." How would I have known that book unless I was open-minded? How are you going to understand that book if you don't have an education in physics?
In the end, you don't have any information to offer by way of defense or persuasion. All you have is bad-mouthing and names. That tells the story.
If you haven’t seen this, you need to. The Iraq jellyfish UFO that was only visible to thermal sensors. They could not see it with night vision or other optics. Just the thermal. And even then, you can clearly see the temperature of the object is cycling, sometimes it becomes almost background, and then it glows hot.
People have said it’s crud on the lens, but that’s not possible because as the camera follows it it doesn’t hold position on the lens surface.
This is the best visible proof that someone has technology that’s undisclosed to the public. It cannot be explained how this thing is flying using traditional
They've also used a saucer shaped one, completely covered in LEDs (like completely covered in "TV screen") with hundreds of cameras that would project the background to the front, making it appear invisible... From all sides.
Packed with serious computing power and communication gear, it could track EVERY single person, vehicle and moving object SIMULTANEOUSLY, giving a live picture AND continuously updated analysis of the situation and predictive probability of what certain forces may do next, in the "theatre".... since the early 90s, BTW.
Long ago. Molt Taylor produced his Aerocar, approved by the government for production and operation on road and air, in 1949. Earlier efforts date back to 1937 and before. All this seems new when you don't know the history.
No rational objection to being approved for operations on both ground and air. Do you want the vehicle to be a crappy car, and/or a crappy airplane?
For some reason I have always known that gravity could be manipulated by electro-magnetic fields - although when I was 9 years old (in 1980) I couldn't have put it exactly in those terms.
What I did do, however, was create a picture of the future (as an assignment) and I drew an aerodynamic car running on the road that was hovering about 1 foot off the ground, following & powered by a metal strip running along the road buried under the surface.
So,
Electric car
Guided driving
Electromagnetic repulsion (i.e. not done with magnets like the bullet train)
Vimanas 7000 years ago
References to these flying machines were common in ancient Indian texts, even describing their use in warfare, and being able to fly within Earth's atmosphere. Vimanas were also said to be able to travel into space and under water.
I'm not sure how I can get more specific than "Electrogravitics", publicly published research papers and the entire field of research disappearing from the public sphere after extremely promising results.
Do you want me to do your job for you and actually curate a list of these papers?
I have direct experience with the Federal Government when they decide a breakthrough energy technology is too disruptive to their monopoly.
Become familiar with the Inventions Secrecy Act and how it's been used thousands of times (and that's just what they will admit to).
I'm not sure where your hostility is coming from unless you're involved in a scientific field yourself and you've been restricted to the hum-drum malaise of "mainstream" science. If that's the case, I can assure you that there's a much bigger, stranger and more exotic world out there if you know where to find it.
Already been Q-ing up some automotive engineers. Just have to start planning on "what to do in case the anti-grav fails" so we're not dropping Ford Lightning II's down on someone's house with a load of gravel!
Evidence? This is a complete fantasy. No artifacts, documentation, testimony, or witnesses. They spent money on the V-2 and stumbled over making an atomic bomb.
I can't stomach a 5-hour video, so I looked at the PowerPoint presentation. As usual, a picture needs a thousand words of explanation (that is really what the old saying means) and the explanation was missing. He seems to have stumbled across another version of "pushing" gravity, where things are pushed together by the pressure of the surrounding medium and the mutual blockage of that pressure by shadowing. The astronomer Tom van Flandern was a proponent of that theory. It has some credence due to its similarity to the known mechanism of the Casimir force (mutual shielding from excluded virtual photons).
He derives some intriguing results from quantum theory, but his experimental method leaves many questions open, as he does not account for the Earth's permanent magnetic and electric fields. It would be expectable that electromagnetic field generation would interact with these fields. Using a balloon to balance the device is unexpected, particularly if he must take pains to exclude breezes. One might have supposed conducing the experiment in a vacuum enclosure with a scale balance to magnify any alterations in weight. Exclusion of subtle environmental interactions has been the bane and headache of most experiments in related phenomena (e.g., reactionless thrust). And while near-field effects might be justified, the demonstrated far-field effect of gravity is not so easily explained. It this effect is real, then one might suppose there would be a similar effect from the universal background radiation, but no one has offered any evidence of that.
I believe EM fields can manipulate dark energy which in part can reverse the effects of mass through a process that's largely ignored by mainstream science but I'm just a layman.
But we've had the technology to fly ET home for quite some time according to Lockheed Martin's CEO IIRC.
Also I've experienced the TR-3B Astra first hand albeit my memory is murky.
Disclaimer, I obviously have no proof so take it how you like.
Since everything is made up of electrical energy, it seems perfectly sensible that mass can be transported. Atoms make up everything. Atoms are electrons, protons and neutrons spinning. Not touching each other. Simply arranged differently to present a ‘mass’. Mind blowing when you think of the details.
Yes, aside from the energy requirements of converting mass to energy and back again, there is also the massive problem of reconstituting the information by which the particles are rearranged to duplicate the original object. Don't try it on anything living, however.
We've already had Anti-Gravity for a long time.
They're only now allowing it to go public.
^^^THIS^^^
I sincerely hope that the Normies can finally figure out that whatever tech gets introduced to the civilians, the US MCIC has had it for at least 25 yrs before it goes public. In some cases, these technologies have been around for 50+ yrs.
They've had this since WW2.
This is the stuff Germans were working on.
My theory is that we've had this stuff much, much, much longer than that. Possibly thousands of years, and that civilization gets "reset" every couple hundred years.
Think about it for a bit. Every major invention seemed to have happened in the past couple hundred years. Yet nothing modern could possibly make the pyramids, as the most obvious example. Where is that tech?
Most of our conversations right now are on digital media. This thread right here, and my post responding to it, are on digital media. If the internet goes down permanently, this section of history will be mostly as well. Gone, except in books and memories.
If there is a major fallout that kills 95% of humanity, and the rest are busy trying to survive and repopulate, then within just a few generations it'll be a whole new batch of people to give tech to and let them think they invented it themselves. A new cycle.
How would we ever know? How would future generations know? Even if we printed this entire thread out, what are the chances it gets into the hands of someone 500 years later after civilization has collapsed and the cycle renewed yet again? Future generations will think they invented the internet, just like we currently believe we invented the internet less than 50 years ago. But none of this internet will make it into theirs 500 years from now.
EDIT: Look up OOParts on your favorite search engine. Leads credibility to this theory.
We can't build the old church's either. We are a traumatized civilization of a past reset. It seems like it may have happened in the late 1700's or early 1800's. Towns and buildings are founded and orphans were called foundlings.
Yes!
lol the history is available, if you know where to look. this kind of speculation is not necessary or helpful.
We know they rewrite history, he’s just taking it a step further than the norm.
Backup offline.
These is very little downside to more people doing it.
a step further into fiction 🙄
But how do you know? Because someone else told you? How do you really know?
I don’t see anything wrong with this kind of speculation absent hard evidence. Why don’t you tell us where to look, since apparently you know?
seek, and ye shall find
If any man ask thee to walk with him a mile, walk with him two.
Pay up dude. Don’t come on here saying you got super secret info and not share it. That’s so gay.
Please name some of "these technologies." The way we have such things for 50+ years is because they have been available for 50+ years, and we know about them.
Correct. They've been working on it since they found the "bell" after WW2. As well, the military have openly admitted a few times that they are 25-40 years ahead in technology than the public is made aware of.
Example : UFO's.
Did you know the most commonly reported 'UFO' between the late 40's to the mid 80's? A triangle. What aircraft did the USA debut to the world in the late 80's? Two flying triangles, the F-117 and the B2
An absolute big nothing. Only rumor and speculation. I read a book all about it, and it came down to hints, "someone said," and sheer fantasy. No photos. No diagrams. No reports. No witnesses.
The F-117 and B-2 are far from triangles. You would have better luck with the F-102 and F-106, which had delta wings. And they are all far from UFOs. The projected A-12 Avenger II "flying dorito" was a literal triangle (but was never built).
Yes, but it's great that they are now allowing it to go public. Still good news.
Agreed. Pretty sure that is how the pyramids were built.
Cool. I could stand to lose a few pounds.
No. You are “prepping” by keeping a years supply of food on your body. If you can outrun the Venezuelan gangs you will be fine.
I don't have to outrun the Venezualan gangs, I just have to outrun you!
🐊
Nikola Tesla in 1911
"The flying machine of the future my flying machine will be heavier than air, but it will not be an aeroplane. It will have no wings. It will be substantial, solid, stable. You cannot have a stable airplane."
"My flying machine will have neither wings nor propellers. You might see it on the ground and you would never guess that it was a flying machine. Yet it will be able to move at will through the air in any direction with perfect safety"
IT's horrendous to me that we still fly around in dangerous airplanes, and helicopters that kill some of our best people.
And Tesla had no flying machine. Nothing easier than to talk about than dreams. Tesla was a great inventor, and his inventions are firmly within the laws of physics, but he was also a grandiose self-promoter. Many of his prophecies came to nothing.
Get lost DeathyRayDesigner. We've done this dance twice already. It's my contention that your close minded about this and a fat headed stubborn bastard. So why bother coming in threads like this? it's clear you have zero intention to have an open minded discussion. Seems your just here to be the biggest brain in the room, and tell everyone how wrong they are. So why bother coming into a thread like this, is it just to feel better about your EGO. There's no way you could be wrong about nature of electricity and physics? right? You're smarter than Nikola Tesla right? Just head on over r/physics and discuss over there with people more like you.
Tesla absolutely envisioned this FLYING MACHINE, just like he envisioned the rotating magnetic field in his visions, and knew it would work before he even built it. That's how Teslas brain worked. When Tesla says the product of his dreams is a flying machine that doesn't work on the standard principles of FLIGHT, he's not talking about some grandiose nonsense, it was the product of his dreams as he stated.
Everything Tesla worked towards was to make his DREAM the flying machine he envisioned a reality. The wireless power system he invented (which I know you don't believe existed) was only invented so he could power his flying machine from the ground.
The universe is electric, as is the Sun. The Sun is not powered by a thermonuclear reaction like we've all been told. Momentum can be created electrically, and inertia can be cancelled electrically. Tesla knew this intuitively as I know it intuitively. You don't know it intuitively, because you're a monkey.
I have read books on Tesla, with admiration and some understanding, since I have a 50-year background in aerospace engineering. i am by no means close-minded, but I do have a realistic perspective. i "bother" coming into threads like this because I am dissatisfied with people getting all worked up over the kind and speed of sleigh that Santa Claus rides in.
There is never any new evidence to consider. The whole field of quantum physics, semiconductors, and lasers emerged and elaborated entirely outside of Tesla's thinking. So, it is evidence that he surely didn't think of everything. And just because he was right about rotating electric fields doesn't prove he is right about anything else. It is a logical fallacy to believe so. (He totally discounted quantum physics, which goes to show how close-minded and incorrect he could be.)
Here you claim that the product of Tesla's dreams is not grandiose nonsense. You saying so is at least grandiose nonsense. I've had dreams, too. None of them have come real.
What wireless power system? There is simply no evidence of anything working. The Wardenclyffe tower was never explained by Tesla and he was never able to bring it to fruition. It died in obscurity. Tesla was not able to convince his benefactor to keep pouring money into it. The benefactor was open-minded enough and respectful of Tesla enough to start the project---but Tesla was at a loss for words to justify any further investment. His fault, not the benefactor's.
Yeah, the sun is powered by thermonuclear reactions. The theory explains a whole lot of astronomic physics. It also has electrical properties, best explained by Laszlo Kortvelyessy in his book, "The Electric Universe." How would I have known that book unless I was open-minded? How are you going to understand that book if you don't have an education in physics?
In the end, you don't have any information to offer by way of defense or persuasion. All you have is bad-mouthing and names. That tells the story.
If anti gravity exist perhaps what we believe to be gravity does not.
given on a powerpoint for download? text preview is "code"
Can someone verify this is not a trojan? powerpoint is a known vector.
Thanks for the warning!
Who still uses powerpoint? lol
If you haven’t seen this, you need to. The Iraq jellyfish UFO that was only visible to thermal sensors. They could not see it with night vision or other optics. Just the thermal. And even then, you can clearly see the temperature of the object is cycling, sometimes it becomes almost background, and then it glows hot.
People have said it’s crud on the lens, but that’s not possible because as the camera follows it it doesn’t hold position on the lens surface.
This is the best visible proof that someone has technology that’s undisclosed to the public. It cannot be explained how this thing is flying using traditional
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcEEXLOORLI&pp=ygUNSmVsbHlmaXNoIHVmbw%3D%3D
They've also used a saucer shaped one, completely covered in LEDs (like completely covered in "TV screen") with hundreds of cameras that would project the background to the front, making it appear invisible... From all sides.
Packed with serious computing power and communication gear, it could track EVERY single person, vehicle and moving object SIMULTANEOUSLY, giving a live picture AND continuously updated analysis of the situation and predictive probability of what certain forces may do next, in the "theatre".... since the early 90s, BTW.
I really don't want to see cars flying around.
If they use anti-gravity they would not be flying they would be translating.
No "flying" aerodynamics going on.
I'll get myself the invisible version then.
Lol so then I'll just see you floating around? Ok.
You got that Wonder Woman connection? I personally want the Thanos Helicopter
Absolutely. The only problem is remembering where I parked.
You won't.
Someone built a flying car about 20 years ago.
Thanks to government bureaucracy, it had to be registered as both an automobile and an aircraft.
Was this the Moeller, or another one?
Not sure. I saw it on the Discovery Channel.
Long ago. Molt Taylor produced his Aerocar, approved by the government for production and operation on road and air, in 1949. Earlier efforts date back to 1937 and before. All this seems new when you don't know the history.
No rational objection to being approved for operations on both ground and air. Do you want the vehicle to be a crappy car, and/or a crappy airplane?
No worries, we'll all be dead before there are flying cars.
We've been promised this shit our whole lives, like jet packs.
The Jetsons!!!! I've been waiting on flying cars myself. Lol
I just want a Rosie robot 🤖
Yeah I wouldn't mind one of her either lol
♪ I like big bots and I cannot lie
You other brothers can't deny...
Baby Got Back slash! ♫
Ever wander over to "altpropulsion.com"??
Why not?
After chemtrails for 50 years, I'd rather look at only real clouds in the sky the next few decades.
Here's a weird thing.
For some reason I have always known that gravity could be manipulated by electro-magnetic fields - although when I was 9 years old (in 1980) I couldn't have put it exactly in those terms.
What I did do, however, was create a picture of the future (as an assignment) and I drew an aerodynamic car running on the road that was hovering about 1 foot off the ground, following & powered by a metal strip running along the road buried under the surface.
So,
Tell me that wasn't bang on (or will be) :D
Vimanas 7000 years ago References to these flying machines were common in ancient Indian texts, even describing their use in warfare, and being able to fly within Earth's atmosphere. Vimanas were also said to be able to travel into space and under water.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mj1zuGRi31s
Started in the 50's."Electrogravitics" are all over research papers in the early 50's, then suddenly around '55, the references disappear.
The research obviously went black.
Every now and again, some naive scientist will post something publicly about promising research and they either mysteriously die or just disappear.
I am so very obviously not talking about those instances.
But hey, hopefully it felt good to get up on that high horse.
I'm not sure how I can get more specific than "Electrogravitics", publicly published research papers and the entire field of research disappearing from the public sphere after extremely promising results.
Do you want me to do your job for you and actually curate a list of these papers?
I have direct experience with the Federal Government when they decide a breakthrough energy technology is too disruptive to their monopoly.
Become familiar with the Inventions Secrecy Act and how it's been used thousands of times (and that's just what they will admit to).
I'm not sure where your hostility is coming from unless you're involved in a scientific field yourself and you've been restricted to the hum-drum malaise of "mainstream" science. If that's the case, I can assure you that there's a much bigger, stranger and more exotic world out there if you know where to find it.
It's becoming increasingly unclear to me what you're looking to get out of this interaction.
X: https://x.com/PhdBrandenburg/status/1830089894934561239
Nitter: https://nitter.poast.org/PhdBrandenburg/status/1830089894934561239
PDF: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383609891_Gravity_Modification_Experiment_Description_and_Results_presented_at_APEC_Propulsion_Conference_83124
Do any of these sources come in a format that's not commonly used to spread computer viruses?
Sauce that anti-gravity exists: https://www.mrlocalhistory.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Christie-Balloon-802x840.jpg
If they've modified gravity; then they should be the first ones to Fall Off the Planet. KEK!
Could someone translate this into Redneck technology? Does this mean we finally get the flying cars we were promised by the year 2000? Keke
Already been Q-ing up some automotive engineers. Just have to start planning on "what to do in case the anti-grav fails" so we're not dropping Ford Lightning II's down on someone's house with a load of gravel!
Parachute?
Nazi Germany did this in the 1930's. Can you imagine the progress since then?
Evidence? This is a complete fantasy. No artifacts, documentation, testimony, or witnesses. They spent money on the V-2 and stumbled over making an atomic bomb.
I can't stomach a 5-hour video, so I looked at the PowerPoint presentation. As usual, a picture needs a thousand words of explanation (that is really what the old saying means) and the explanation was missing. He seems to have stumbled across another version of "pushing" gravity, where things are pushed together by the pressure of the surrounding medium and the mutual blockage of that pressure by shadowing. The astronomer Tom van Flandern was a proponent of that theory. It has some credence due to its similarity to the known mechanism of the Casimir force (mutual shielding from excluded virtual photons).
He derives some intriguing results from quantum theory, but his experimental method leaves many questions open, as he does not account for the Earth's permanent magnetic and electric fields. It would be expectable that electromagnetic field generation would interact with these fields. Using a balloon to balance the device is unexpected, particularly if he must take pains to exclude breezes. One might have supposed conducing the experiment in a vacuum enclosure with a scale balance to magnify any alterations in weight. Exclusion of subtle environmental interactions has been the bane and headache of most experiments in related phenomena (e.g., reactionless thrust). And while near-field effects might be justified, the demonstrated far-field effect of gravity is not so easily explained. It this effect is real, then one might suppose there would be a similar effect from the universal background radiation, but no one has offered any evidence of that.
I believe EM fields can manipulate dark energy which in part can reverse the effects of mass through a process that's largely ignored by mainstream science but I'm just a layman.
But we've had the technology to fly ET home for quite some time according to Lockheed Martin's CEO IIRC.
Also I've experienced the TR-3B Astra first hand albeit my memory is murky.
Disclaimer, I obviously have no proof so take it how you like.
A patent for you: https://drive.filen.io/d/210c510d-846e-479a-945d-9a3ec3847b45#6XQ63nxWzBNNTDcIJPN85hhhTwwMErhC
Another one: https://drive.filen.io/d/287f0b37-46fd-4a36-97ab-15b924eef693#zcdHekGpcJTBidfUT9qhgvJGUTQxTtNx
A TR-3B crew rotation: https://drive.filen.io/d/adf2d2fa-f0af-4f99-bff5-7445944bf5af#9uLqLNK4CBDLJ7EH8lgyuzYfb6alqa42
Since everything is made up of electrical energy, it seems perfectly sensible that mass can be transported. Atoms make up everything. Atoms are electrons, protons and neutrons spinning. Not touching each other. Simply arranged differently to present a ‘mass’. Mind blowing when you think of the details.
Yes, aside from the energy requirements of converting mass to energy and back again, there is also the massive problem of reconstituting the information by which the particles are rearranged to duplicate the original object. Don't try it on anything living, however.
It almost always works on Star Trek…
John Hutchinson has entered the room, along with about a couple of hundred others.
Gravity?
This may be right up there with the invention of the the flux capacitor! Great work!
Could they target certain regions of the country to have higher bone density and bigger muscles due to more gravity?