This is one of the best theories I've seen yet. Even if it doesn't tie in 11.3 and 11.4, it still bigly jives with what we might see. I like it. You got my brain cells excited!
There were approximately 161 million registered voters in 2022. 50.1% of that is 80.6 million. The BOSS got 74 million votes in 2020. With the increases he's made across all demographics this time around, I can agree with this theory.
Some states have registration by party, but some do not. Some states have early voting for everyone, but some do not.
The data that we're seeing is in the states that have early voting for everyone AND registration by party, we're seeing more registered Republicans voting. This is promising, but it isn't proof of how people are voting. We're also missing the data from the states that don't have registration by party or early voting.
Actual proof doesn't get released until after the polls have closed for those states.
A simpler explanation
Trump wants people to vote early to better ensure that people actually vote. A million and one things could happen to prevent a Trump voter from voting on election day, so it's better to lock in those votes early and not take any chances.
with a large-scale tabletop cybersecurity exercise
on November 5, 2024
AFCEA Atlanta is proud to announce our Fourth Annual Homeland Security Conference is back for 2024! This will be a multi-day event focused on critical infrastructure, with a pre-conference cybersecurity exercise open to registrants who want to observe or participate.”
I'm confused about what this "theory" is. Let's say the number of votes cast by Nov 2 is greater than the number of registered voters. What does that prove? The number of votes cast should obviously NEVER exceed the number of registered voters, right?
Is there something I don't know about where they falsify the number of votes cast to be less than the number of registered voters before the final votes are cast but after early voting ends?
Is the number of votes cast "so far" a number that is displayed somewhere until Nov 2nd when early voting ends and then it gets hidden before they add up the rest of the votes?
Can somebody complete the theory that was started in this post?
Maybe fox news will call it a week early,to make up for their past fukery.
People should never allow corporate news organizations to be the authority that calls our elections.
We’re not allowing it, they pretty much do it on their own and if we question outcomes the government arrests us.
Why do they have the ability to "call elections" on their own? Who gives them that power?
Nobody outside of those with the power to print money.
Soros.
The election is actually Jan 6.
They fuked us on that one as well.
Amen.
😂
Brett Baier right now
Keklarious!
Lol, they will call it next week for biden.
LoL I didn't see yours when I replied at the top...we think alike.
Fox News: 23 Oct 24 Joe Biden wins Arizona!
This is one of the best theories I've seen yet. Even if it doesn't tie in 11.3 and 11.4, it still bigly jives with what we might see. I like it. You got my brain cells excited!
Maybe not such a crazy theory...
Actually, what if the early vote exceeds registered voters. That would be a scandal.
This has been my expectation too.
Journalist Mark Halperin Says Trump Victory Could Be Guaranteed Before Election Day If Early Vote Numbers Hold. - TGP
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/10/journalist-mark-halperin-says-trump-victory-could-be/
Art of War. Win the battle before it begins. NCSWIC.
That's top tier date fagging.
Just to clarify. The phrases (called) and (declared) aren't part of the drops.
u/#q25
u/#q34
This seems very unlikely to me, but anything is possible in this clown ass world.
There were approximately 161 million registered voters in 2022. 50.1% of that is 80.6 million. The BOSS got 74 million votes in 2020. With the increases he's made across all demographics this time around, I can agree with this theory.
There are over 210 million registered voters in 2024.
I like it
https://truthsocial.com/@Qurham17/113353758143472836
This is exactly what I say too, I agree with the OP on this.
I'm skeptical
Some states have registration by party, but some do not. Some states have early voting for everyone, but some do not.
The data that we're seeing is in the states that have early voting for everyone AND registration by party, we're seeing more registered Republicans voting. This is promising, but it isn't proof of how people are voting. We're also missing the data from the states that don't have registration by party or early voting.
Actual proof doesn't get released until after the polls have closed for those states.
A simpler explanation
Trump wants people to vote early to better ensure that people actually vote. A million and one things could happen to prevent a Trump voter from voting on election day, so it's better to lock in those votes early and not take any chances.
Here is something more intriguing. Is this the cyber equivalent of Event 201? https://x.com/ellheartless/status/1848649564728778994?s=61
https://atlanta.afceachapters.org/2024-homeland-security-critical-infrastructure-conference
“AFCEA Atlanta
Homeland Security Conference
on Critical Infrastructure
November 6-7 , 2024
with a large-scale tabletop cybersecurity exercise
on November 5, 2024
AFCEA Atlanta is proud to announce our Fourth Annual Homeland Security Conference is back for 2024! This will be a multi-day event focused on critical infrastructure, with a pre-conference cybersecurity exercise open to registrants who want to observe or participate.”
Get ‘er done frens!
Bingo
I'm not sure if this makes sense. Isn't the number of votes needed simply more than what the opponent has?
https://greatawakening.win/p/199O6SVJtD/can-an-illegitimate-congress-cer/
I'm confused about what this "theory" is. Let's say the number of votes cast by Nov 2 is greater than the number of registered voters. What does that prove? The number of votes cast should obviously NEVER exceed the number of registered voters, right?
Is there something I don't know about where they falsify the number of votes cast to be less than the number of registered voters before the final votes are cast but after early voting ends?
Is the number of votes cast "so far" a number that is displayed somewhere until Nov 2nd when early voting ends and then it gets hidden before they add up the rest of the votes?
Can somebody complete the theory that was started in this post?
Read it again. It says nothing about number of votes cast exceeding number of registered voters