The term "Khazarian Mafia" was coined by a man named Gordon Duff. Gordon publishes articles at a website called Veterans Today.
The research below will demonstrate that Gordon Duff is a man who absolutely hates Trump. He absolutely hates Q. He has TDS and has made claims about Trump so outrageous that he makes CNN look fair and balanced.
Why am I posting this article? Because he is ground zero when it comes to all commentary and research on the Khazarian Mafia.
What is the original document outlining the "Khazarian Mafia"?
The document, published on March 11, 2015, is available here:
When did the term "Khazarian Mafia" come into use?
The term was apparently first coined by Gordon Dufff, during a "Syrian Conference on Combatting Terrorism and Religious Extremeism" on December 1, 2014.
At the Syrian Conference on Combating Terrorism and Religious Extremism (December 1, 2014), in his keynote address, Veterans Today Senior Editor and Director Gordon Duff disclosed publicly for the first time ever
Was the term "Khazarian Mafia" ever used before then?
No.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=2010-03-12%202025-04-12&q=khazarian%20mafia&hl=en
The timing of Gordon Duff publishing his original document coincides with the huge initial spike in search interest on Google.
Who are the people who coined and defined the term "Khazarian Mafia"?
The original conference speech in 2014 was given by Gordon Duff. The original document oulining the contents of the speech was posted in 2015 by Preston James and Mike Harris.
Preston James and Mike Harris list Gordon Duff as an informational reference in their document.
Do the authors of the "Khazarian Mafia" document and speech have anything in common?
They all work for the Veterans Today website http://veteranstoday.com/
Gordon Duff, referred to as Veterans Today "Senior Editor", manages the "world's largest private intel organization" and regularly consults governments: https://veteranstoday.com/author/gordonduff/
Gordon is an accredited diplomat and is generally accepted as one of the top global intelligence specialists.
Preston James claims he has ties to "Intel": https://veteranstoday.com/author/jim/
Retired after serving the community for over 36 years during which time there were numerous contacts with those associated with Intel and Law Enforcement.
Mike Harris is Veteran's Today Financial Editor who worked for congress: https://veteranstoday.com/author/harris/
Mr. Harris served as a technical advisor to the Committee on Science and Technology of the US Congress, as well as sitting as Chairman of various boards over the years
What is Does Gordon Duff Think of Trump?
Donald Trump is a Hoax, Only a Bit Gay and Jewish as Well
https://veteranstoday.com/2018/04/28/donald-trump-is-a-hoax-and-only-a-bit-gay-and-jewish-as-well/
The real “ring of truth.” Let’s say you are a testosterone-charged “man’s man,” visiting Moscow with two of the best of the best of Russia’s call girl community in your hotel room. Every drug imaginable is available and your history is exactly that, or is claimed to be, drug and sex orgies with supermodels, prostitutes, porn queens and even “not so willing” hotel maids.
Instead, you pay them to urinate on a bed. Some might call it a waste. Others might call it something else, a minor “in the closet” secret for some, but a “huuge” secret for the former “Queen” of New York’s underground club scene of the 70’s and 80’s.
What does Gordon Duff think of Q?
We are seeing, though Qanon deception, a Trump regime steeped in the occult, steeped in ritual child abuse and in hatred of conventional Christianity.
The article insists Trump is the one participating in child sacrifice because of "qanon".
What else does Gordon Duff think of Trump?
Here he is accusing Trump of being guilty in 10 child rape cases.
Five of the six alleged incidents took place at two of Trump’s best-known properties — Trump Tower in New York City and Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, FL. The exception is incident No. 4, which is the most recent (2012) and took place at Albemarle Estate at Trump Winery. Donald and Eric Trump opened the facility as a bed-and-breakfast in May 2015.
What kind of information does Veterans Today push?
Since authors at Veterans Today are the origin of the Khazarian Mafia story, and because the authors claim to have high intel sources -- it is valuable to see what other kinds of information VT is engaged in.
Gordon Duff calling "qanon" Horse Shit:
Veterans Today gloating over the fact that Trump was banned from Facebook for 2 years:
https://veteranstoday.com/2021/06/04/facebook-dumps-trump-for-two-years/
Editor’s Note: What can I say? It could not happen to a more ‘un-nice guy’. This is an indication that the freebie publicity that Trump so loved will be turned off at Facebook through the next midterm Congressional elections.
Veterans Today stated Q is fake, and because of that ... people didn't rise up with their guns like they were supposed to.
https://veteranstoday.com/2019/03/13/qanon-hope-and-heartbreak/
Q (or QAnon) promised an end to these things, BY SO DOING SERVED ITS MAJOR PURPOSE: a lot of the most outraged and activist people deferred doing anything confrontational and kept their AR-15s on the mantle in the (ultimately vain) hope that some part of the system in some way would correct itself. So they waited and hoped, and kept waiting and hoping…
In summary, if they have bad research and bad takes on Trump and Q, why should anyone believe they have superior research skills when it comes to the Khazarian Mafia? If they don't believe the hundreds of solid Q proofs that were provided, how good of researchers could they really be? And what is the likelihood, with all their ties to intel, that they are simply engaged in pushing a psyop?
You did this before. The Khazarian hypothesis was popularized in 1970 in The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler. Koestler, a jew who began as a zionist referenced much older books to support his idea.
The moniker "Khazarian Mafia" is all that is new. The rest is history.
I think adding this concise descriptor was ingenious.
If you want to learn who the Khazarians actually are and you aren't keen on reading some thick history books but still watch anything on Netflix then The Fall of the Cabal by Janet Ossebaard and Cyntha Koeter is for you.
https://rumble.com/v2l5d0o-fall-of-the-cabal-parts-1-10-full-documentary-hd.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kNS1mw1jmjpt/
https://archive.org/details/fall-of-the-cabal
https://www.fallcabal.com/
The 1970 date seems about right. RINGworld was first published in 1970 and all the "aliens" are metaphors. The full story is a retelling of the wizard of Oz, which is itself a metaphor for the start of the Federal Reserve. The Kzin characters bear a substantial resemblance to a Khazarian Mafia.
Kzin / Khazarian. Tomato / Tomahto.
Similar comms saying the same thing. But who hides behind the metaphor?
There is more than a bit of truth in every psyop.
Some people sure seem to like to oversimplify things and redirect discussion away from those oversimplifications, while decrying other peoples’ oversimplifications.
"Khazarian hypothesis" = some guy guesses about the genetics of Ashkenazi jews.
Do you think that somehow negates anything in my original post?
You harp on Gordon Duff and the term he uses. I show that is irrelevant.
Khazarian Mafia is completely 100% different than the Khazarian hypothesis.
They have as much in common as French people and French fries. The only thing similar is "Khazarian".
One is a guy guessing ethnicity of a group of people, the other insists that the Jews are responsible for everything evil in the world.
I can only presume you haven't read anything about the Khazarian hypothesis.
But you do dispute the Khazarian origin idea common to both Koestler and Duff.
Let me steelman your argument back to you in order to see if I understand your question properly.
The Khazarian hypothesis says Jews might come from Turkey instead of the middle east -- that's all, nothing more nothing less. No insinuation of "name stealers", no implications of anything sinister about them -- just a "hey, their genetics might come from this area instead of that area" ...
Then the next step is you want everyone to believe this is a previous recognition of all the theories behind the Khazarian Mafia -- that somehow use of the "Khazarian" term by Koestler is recognition of the concepts behind the Khazarian Mafia -- i.e. name stealers, that Jews are in control, etc.
Yes, I dispute that Koestler's use of the term has anything to do with Khazarian mafia. And no, I'm not just going to assume the name stealers and all the other rhetoric -- I'm sure if you had a reference for those you would have already used it.
It all started with Duff. Nothing about Koestler has anything to do with the concepts behind the Khazarian mafia or name stealers rhetoric.
If you are Khazarian and living in the Levant claiming the right to do that as a descendant of Hebrews then how does name-stealer not apply?
It's shocking what little evidence you need for you to think you've proven a point.
He had a hypothesis. Hypothesis = guess. But let's assume I grant you the point that they are from a different region.
There's no book that exists that talks about name stealers. There's no prominent article from any reputable author -- not even one with an irreputable author -- that documents in any way, shape or form that real Jews got murdered by fake Jews who took their names.
My problem with those pushing the Khazarian mafia narrative is what little evidence they need to be so certain about something. These things happened hundreds of years ago -- yet Gordon Duff can't even get today's news correct.
He's absolutely certain that Trump raped 10 children. He's absolutely certain Trump got pissed on by prostitutes. These are today's events and he's as wrong as can be -- now we're to believe he's correct about things that happened millennium ago? With zero documentation -- zero sauce?
And you think that referencing that 1976 book was sauce -- somehow relevant, somehow making your point when it objectively has nothing to do with it.
All I can say is you're a gullible lot.
the other insists that the Jews are responsible for everything evil in the world.
but isn’t that actually true?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7L9io-b9Uew
This is exactly what I'm talking about.
The CCP has 2 million spies in the US. They had hundreds of thousands of ballots that they burned at their embassy that were going to be used to overturn our elections.
You are completely oblivious to them as a threat. Will you hold up a photo of Mao standing next to a Jew 80 years ago and claim that Jews control China?
That's the problem with you guys. Any incredible piece of evidence and a jetpack to make a 1000-mile leap of logic is all you need to believe. You're gullible.
Being completely oblivious to all threats except the ones that come from Israel isn't something worth boasting about. Q believers are able to comprehend the threat of Mossad / Israel, but also multitask into seeing all the other threats out there without discounting them because there's no Jew to be seen.
CCP huh?
Didnt jews invent communism?
I already called that you would take any non-Jewish name I give, discount/disregard it and circle back to blaming Jews.
Now do the Muslim brotherhood.
Now do the house of Saud.
Here's a tough one -- do Afghanistan.
Let's hear how they're all muh joos, with no culpability for any other group. Show off your smooth brain.
Don't read the following line until you're done doing the above.
Are you done? Good. Now give a credible source for any of it that isn't a far fetched 1000-mile leap of logic.
The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler merely makes a hypothesis as to the race of the people, whereas the Veterans Today "intel asset" author who coined the term Kazarian Mafia blames them for all the world's problems.
Quite the difference
Well lets see…
Usury is the root of all evil
And who is behind usury?
People get upset when you point the finger at jews, but just study the history and context of every pogrom ever, and you’ll soon discover a very clear pattern of predictable behaviors and consequences
So are you saying The Jews™ have been in global power positions for the last 2,000 years and are thus responsible for the world's woes?
Many people. Notably, in recent centuries, Jews have been forced into financial work by the Catholic church due to them barring their members from it while simultaneously barring Jews from any other form of work in society, which they ruled almost completely for over 1,000 years. So, there's that pesky little nuance to factor in...
Kek, they literally forced them into finance only to turn around and make them their own private bankers 😂😂😂 Look up "the guardians of the papal treasure"
I get upset when people miss the forest for the trees personally.
Hence being thrown out of over 100 countries.
You should amend your OP to add clarity to the nuance pertaining to The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler. Just to shut the stupidity down. people love their pet psyops don't they?
Great post, I've been yelling that the whole "Jews run the world" psyop is coming from high level cabal intel assets for about three years now. This adds concrete support to that. (Well, I go one step further into the throne room of satan in Vatican City, but that's for another post 😆
Regardless of where the term comes from, genetic studies and linguistic analysis disproves the Khazarian hypothesis and it's a common trope to discredit Jewish history. Why would the Cohen priestly class that only passes down the male chromosome, share the same haplogroup across Ashkenazi's, Sephardim, and Mizrahis? It would not be possible if they were converted Turks. Also 30-60% of Ashkenazi DNA comes from the Levant. There was a poorly conducted study from a scientist that was out looking for it that tried to show Turkish origins and that study was later discredited.
Ted Pike did a documentary almost 40 years ago, where he went into a synagogue and showed a lot of information about what is in the Jewish Encyclopedia, which is the Jews' official documentation of their history.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6YiwvktXQryW
In it, we see references -- by Jews themselves -- that they are Edomites of biblical times, and also Khazarians of 1,200 years ago.
Their DNA has been mixed over the years with other races/ethnicities, as well.
Ashkenazi lived among the Germanic people and mixed to some degree with them. The Sephardics mixed with Turks and others. This is why there are differences in appearance among Jews, but they are all Jews.
There is no such thing as a "fake Jew."
We know that the Jews have a long history of name stealing. Goldberg is a German name, for example. Likewise, they falsely claim to be the Israelites of the Bible, when in fact they are descendants of the Edomites, who were mixed with Canaanites and Kenites.
Centuries later, some of them further mixed with Europeans, Asians, and others. There is some good evidence that many Hispanics have Jew blood in their ancestry, as well.
Hold on. The invented lore of muh "name stealers" is that actual Jewish people with actual Jewish last names went riding down the road on a cart, and were ransacked by bad people who killed them and then took over their names.
Demonstrating that Goldberg is only a German name would prove the exact opposite. At best you could claim that actual Jews were riding down the road in a cart, were ransacked, killed and then the bad guys refused to take their last names.
Also, when Jennifer Cohen marries Gerald Goldberg, and their children all receive the Goldberg last name, you think this is evidence that Gerald is a name stealer and thus proves the existence of the Khazarian Mafia?
You're a gullible lot.
That isn't the allegation. The allegation is that the Khazarians used to be bandits along the silk road who would murder travellers and assume their place. The people they murdered weren't Jewish people, they were just anyone who happened across the Khazarians.
The allegation further goes that Yaroslav I put a stop to it, forcing the Khazarians to convert from Tengrism to an Abrahamic religion. The Khazarians chose Judaism for its tradition of Babylonian Talmudism.
Why so offended? He is right the name changes are real historically.
An example of the lore of the "name stealers", as invented and presented on GAW in the past, is that If Joseph Cohen is travelling, gets waylaid by evil Khazarians who then adopt Cohen as their new last name.
If the argument is that Goldberg is German and not actually Jewish, how is that evidence the Khazarians stole a Jewish name? Wouldn't it be evidence they didn't steal a Jewish name -- but decided to keep their own German name instead?
I don't believe this to be true at all. Jews historically don't have last names, last names were adopted assimilate into European society. Goldberg just means gold mountain from German, but often they would use their profession as their last names as well. Traditionally, the last name was "Son of <your father's name>. It was common for conversos from the Spanish Inquisition would used nature or animals for their last names like Carneiro or Lobo, it doesn't make them name stealers. Also haven't denied that the cultures were mixed at some point in the line, but the Cohen or Levi traits would have passed down the paternal line based on the rules and this is proven to be true. If Ashkenazis were converted turks the Kohanim would not share the same haplogroup as Cohen's that are Sephardi or Mizrahi and they would not have 30-60% of their DNA from the Levant. That narrative just doesn't add up.
Based on biblical history and archaeology, I believe the Exodus narrative may not have occurred exactly as described in the Bible. Instead, for me it likely reflects the historical expulsion of the Hyksos from Egypt before the New Kingdom period. The Levites, possibly the only tribe originating from Egypt, were not allocated land in Israel but were dispersed across the kingdom to serve as priests and their names sound more Egyptian then the rest like Pinchas (Phinehas), Aaron (aḥa-rw), Hophni, and Moses (Egyptian word ms or mes meaning “born of"). Perhaps in relation to the expulsion of Akhenaten's monotheism; Moses is roughly 60–80 years after the abandonment of Atenism.
I believe Bibi Netanyahu also has a name change or two in his life.
But you didn't answer the question originally. Why would Cohens across the different regions share the same subclad of a haplogroup (J1c3d) if they were converted Turks? If they were converted Turks they would not share it.
Not to mention the 2013 study by Behar et al., titled "No Evidence from Genome-Wide Data of a Khazar Origin for the Ashkenazi Jews that did a more comprehensive analysis.
As a side note, I find it compelling that the tribe of Dan might be linked to the Denyen, a Sea Peoples group from the Bronze Age collapse who were of Aegean origin. The Song of Deborah (Judges 5:17) is said to be the oldest passage in the Torah, describes Dan as lingering “by the ships,” suggesting a maritime culture akin to the Denyen and was put in a negative light for not not helping like the other tribes. Archaeological finds at Tel Dan, like Aegean-style pottery. Jacob’s blessing in Genesis 49:16 (“Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel”) affirms their inclusion but it's interesting why Dan is singled out. Samson story (who comes from Dan) kind of reads like a Greek hero story. And were situated right above the Philistines, who were also of Greek descent and one of the Sea Peoples.
They are Edomites, descendants of Esau and Canaanites. Read about Edom in the Old testament books Obadiah and Malachi.
It's always been Esau vs Jacob. Edomites vs Israelites Todays Jews who are (Shhh! Edomites) vs Israelites: North Western European, including Brits, Irish, Germany, American Anglo Saxon Caucasians.
Now do you see why they want to flood the white countries with dark people? Why do they pay black NBA players tens of millions of dollars to dribble a basketball?
Their money attracks beautiful white women. They have children that don't even look like a the mother and that lineage is wiped out.
Over time this will completely eradicate the Israelites race.
God hated this interracial mixing in the Old Testament. He forbid his people at that time because the Christ was not born yet.
Now today are we saved by race? NO We are saved by God's Grace.
Why are Europeans Israelites?
Take a listen to this excellent speech/lecture regarding the migration of the Israelites of the Bible out of the Levant and ultimately into Europe:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/xo7b3ODxp8im
Excellent brother. I am 25 minutes in and I love this guy. He's even lined up the 70 weeks of Daniel to 70 AD and Titus.
The Anglo Saxon race entered the continent of Europe from the Caucasus Mountain Range circa 600 BC hense the reason the white race is called "Caucasian".
These energetic tribal nations were variously called called Scythians, Goths, Gatae, Massagatae, and Sacae.
They were tracked into central and north west Europe where they became the dominate race by 200 BC.
A carefully analysis of the Bible, the Apocrypha, Josephus Jewish Antiquities and a number of other Ancient sources reveals that the Goths Sacae etc who emerged from the north side of the Caucasus Mountains are none other than the so called ten tribes of Israel" who disappeared into the mountain region from the south side in the seventh century before Christ.
Their sudden migration northward was the dissolution of the Assyrian Empire and their desire to escape from their capture by the same people.
Excerpt from The Anglo-Israel Thesis Author Reed Benson Cheap book on Amazon great read.
Also important to remember that it was prophesied that the Israelites would forget who they were.
And they did.
Jesus said why he came --
Matthew 15:24 (using the Expanded Bible version, which expands verses, using more than one version of the Bible):
It is entirely genetic -- the FAMILY of the Israelite people. These are BLOOD LINES.
This would explain the exodus out of that Assyrian area in a hurry.
So the lost tribes were the future Caucasians? The 10 tribes and that makes sense as the Lord mentioned.
Lol @ still thinking the Anglo Saxons or any Germanic people have anything to do with the Caucasus mountains
So you down voted me for quoting a concise research book?
Let me guess you are a Zionist dispensational or Israeli.
I'll guess that you're a Jew hater who has been banned multiple times from GAW for violating the TOS.
Let me confirm by viewing your profile. 16 days old -- yep.
I along with friends here are clearing the fog and shining a light of truth. Iron sharpens iron.
You should try it sometime.
That's WHY they were labeled "Caucasian."
Duh.
The ancient Greeks were dated from the 12th century BC. The epitome of the Caucasian phenotype as proven by their sculpture. Along with the Egyptians. The Etruscans date from the 9th Century BC. The Phoeneicans date from the 12th century BC (and were contemporary with the Jews of the old testament). All these pre-date the migration you speak of.
Oy-vey….. this again?
"Kazarian Mafia" is repackaged info designed to distract from specific Swiss/Italian/London elites running the show AND to ramp up anti-semitism in order to justify restrictions on speech and guns. Timing of its launch coincides directly with globalist tyrannical push for more centralized control, Central Bank digital currency, and digital IDs/vaccine passports, being implemented mostly by people claiming Jewish faith/family affiliation (both real ones and fake ones).
Broader context: 2014 was supposed to be global WAR with similar events as 1914-1917, including Communist takeover of the US. So this psyop was part of that larger "2nd phase" destruction of US that started 25 years before in 1989 by George HW Bush Sr (per his 'New World Order' language). You are observing one little operation in the much larger 100 plan to destroy America. It is 4 phases, each in 25 year blocks with key events at the start of each block. 1989+25=2014, 2014+25=2039, etc. Next major globalist "event attempt" is in 2039 with likely setups for it 2029-2033. Note parallels to plan to takedown Russia initiated 1889 with "pandemic" followed by WW1 (1914), WW2 (1939), Attempt at WW3 (1964, pushed early to 1961), Breakup of SU and Russian theft by globalists (1989).
Similar 100 year plans run on French Republic (1789), and Dutch Republic (1589 start?). Unclear who was attacked 1689 (possibly India), but pattern repeats back to 1489 at least. They are 100 year plans because they are executed by multigenerational triumverate of Gfather, Father, son EACH contribiting 33.3 years minimum "core service" (with some overlap). Republics and nationalists are the targets because they are VERY, VERY dangerous to the globalists.
Appropriate username.
I think they would identify as jewish but are likely decended from Khazaria who say they are Jews but are imposters.
I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars—I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.
And you're ethnically stupid
Ethnically Ashkanazi Jews
This is an excellent, well-researched post. Stickied to raise awareness about potential disinfo aimed at Anons.
It doesn't matter what they are called. If they committed treasonous crimes, they need to be executed.
Rev 2:9 and 3:9. Only one group has been screaming this.
Barnes makes notable commentary
And I know the blasphemy - The reproaches; the harsh and bitter revilings. On the word "blasphemy," see the notes on Matthew 9:3; Matthew 26:65. The word here does not seem to refer to blasphemy against God, but to bitter reproaches against themselves. The reason of these reproaches is not stated, but it was doubtless on account of their religion.
Of them which say they are Jews - Who profess to be Jews. The idea seems to be that though they were of Jewish extraction, and professed to be Jews, they were not true Jews; they indulged in a bitterness of reproach, and a severity of language, which showed that they had not the spirit of the Jewish religion; they had nothing which became those who were under the guidance of the spirit of their own Scriptures. That would have inculcated and fostered a milder temper; and the meaning here is, that although they were of Jewish origin, they were not worthy of the name. That spirit of bitter opposition was indeed often manifested in their treatment of Christians, as it had been of the Saviour, but still it was foreign to the true nature of their religion. There were Jews in all parts of Asia Minor, and the apostles often encountered them in their journeyings, but it would seem that there was something which had particularly embittered those of Smyrna against Christianity. What this was is now unknown.
It may throw some light on the passage, however, to remark that at a somewhat later period - in the time of the martyrdom of Polycarp - the Jews of Smyrna were among the most bitter of the enemies of Christians, and among the most violent in demanding the death of Polycarp. Eusebius (Eccl. Hist. 4:15) says,. that when Polycarp was apprehended, and brought before the proconsul at Smyrna, the Jews were the most furious of all in demanding his condemnation. When the mob, after his condemnation to death, set about gathering fuel to burn him, "the Jews," says he, "being especially zealous, as was their custom - μάλιστα προθύμως, ὡς ἔθος αὐτοῖς malista prothumōs, hōs ethos autois - ran to procure fuel." And when, as the burning failed, the martyr was transfixed with weapons, the Jews urged and besought the magistrate that his body might not be given up to Christians. Possibly at the time when this epistle was directed to be sent to Smyrna, there were Jews there who manifested the same spirit which those of their countrymen did afterward, who urged on the death of Polycarp.
But are the synagogue of Satan - Deserve rather to be called the synagogue of Satan. The synagogue was a Jewish place of worship (compare the notes on Matthew 4:23), but the word originally denoted "the assembly" or "the congregation." The meaning here is plain, that though they worshipped in a synagogue, and professed to be the worshippers of God, yet they were not worthy of the name, and deserved rather to be regarded as in the service of Satan. "Satan" is the word that is properly applied to the great evil spirit, elsewhere called the devil. See the Luke 22:3 note, and Job 1:6 note.
Anyone who does not understand the mistranslations into English will be misled about this (probably done on purpose).
The word that has been translated to "Jew" in the English versions of the Bible were originally "Judahite" in the Old Testament and "Judean" in the New Testament.
In both cases, they did not refer to what we know today as a "Jew."
Judahites were the descendants of Judah, a son of Jacob/Israel. Thus, all Judahites were also Israelites, and NO JEW is an Israelite.
The Jews were and are the Adversary of the Israelites ("Adversary" in Hebrew was called "Satan").
In the New Testament, anyone living in the Roman province of Judea around the time of Christ was called a "Judean," similar to someone living in Texas is called a "Texan," regardless of race or ethnicity.
Judea was controlled by the Romans, but they allowed the local Edomites to be the local governors running the political operations of the province. So, it was largely Edomites living there, but there were also some others, including true Israelites.
In either case, the word "Jew" in the Bible is ALWAYS a mistranslation, and you have to dig deeper to figure out who is being talked about when that word is used.
what? Ἰουδαῖος
I don't understand, what other word would be used?
IEWE is used in older bibles. Like you said you have to sort out the meaning. Judean Judahite or Judean Edomite.
The inscription on Jesus cross had to have been King of the Judeans.
Which he was not as Pilate was mocking him.
Rome crucified his azz and his wife for participating in doing this to God's Son.
Who do think were Sodom and Gomorrah? Blood lines.
...So glad somebody finally said all this. ThankQ.
Oh FFS the pee tape? I have a hard time believing anyone with this much TDS. The Steele Dossier is now totally debunked. That makes me suspicious of anything else this Duff guy says.
This post is great at exercising how to think critically when reading through links which disagree with your current positions, and they read like disinformation. It also helps later on when you hear such similar stories again, so that you don't need to reread them. Thanks for posting this, Fren.
Notice how those who make these claims always want someone else to go play civil war for them and are never in a hurry to lead the charge and risk getting shot themselves.
Exactly. On Gordon Duff's "about me" page on VT he boasts of his ties to the intel community -- it raises the red flag that he's pushing a psyop.
Pushing for civil war is one of the goals of that psyop.
I think Gordon was pretty spot on about nine eleven and how they took down the towers and about Fukushima too.
Whether or not he coined the phrase and he may not be the best source, we just took the phrase and used it to the obviously terribly bad behavior of Israel and present day Jews.
The first group forced into the Jewish religion was the Edomites. That didn’t work out too well for the Jews either.
Herod was an Edomite King right? Who tried to be "Jewish".
King Herod and the Edomite infiltration: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1764531226210152661.html
Thanks - some good stuff in that thread. Things that most Christians are not aware of.
The Jewish state defeated Edom in battle and forced them to proselytize to Judaism. Herod was appointed King over Judea by the Roman Emperor. The Emperor—knowing Edomites and Jews were kinfolk, he thought that would be okay with the Jews but what he didn’t know was the hatred they had for each other. It is called in the Bible and everlasting hatred.
Correct! Great summary. I had read that Herod had most (if not all) of the Sanhedrin court killed and replaced with Edomite Jews. Is that your understanding?
I don’t know about that since the High Priest had to be of the tribe of Levi. They had to prove their ancestry to be in the priesthood. Doesn’t mean they were not rotten to the core as we see their actions recorded in the Gospels. They were certainly no better than the Edomites.
Very good dig, and quite interesting. Talk about someone with a bad case of TDS. Thank you.
Ben Fulford certainly embraced the term.
Oh shit, its a bait thread
I know some people who are aware that powerful elites ran the world but they can still not comprehend that Trump is dismantling this cabal. They believe he is just a part of their system. Many who did not follow Q or were led to follow Q, cannot see the big picture! Time will tell; the Great Awakening needs to go mainstream!
Here is a study for you by Eran Elhaik.
The Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23241444/
Whether or not Jews came from one region or another has nothing to do with the premise of the "Khazarian mafia".
Here is an AI prompt:
Elhaik’s research pertains only to the scientific (and contentious) debate about the genetic origins of Ashkenazi Jews. It is in no way connected to, nor does it provide support for, the “Khazarian Mafia” conspiracy theory. Any attempt to fuse the two constitutes pseudoscientific misappropriation of legitimate academic work.
By all means, don't let me keep you from sniffing the Khazarian Mafia.