So… a judicial branch judge is overstepping her boundaries and is telling the executive branch how to conduct business? Just another corrupt judge that needs to be removed from the bench.
Judicial interprets and ensures what the legislative initiates is legal while the executive executes the legislative initiatives. Judicial has no enforcement powers. She can order all she wants, but has no authority to enforce.
Karin Johanna Immergut (born 1960)[1] is an American lawyer who has served as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon since 2019. She has concurrently served as a judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court since 2024.
Not any mere judge but a FISA court judge at that. What a coincidence that this criminal institution with their past unmasking shenanigans is still at it.
If he pulls out the insurrection act, he can deploy the NG wherever he wants and he set up that program to be able to deploy NG anywhere in the USA in under an hour a few months ago. They can squawk all they want from the bench about it, just going to draw attention to their own wrongdoings.
Interesting that she was appointed by President Trump - On June 11, 2018 President Donald J. Trump nominated her to serve as a Judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon (to the seat vacated by Judge Anna J. Brown).
Very likely, once SCOTUS rules on it the lawfare loses teeth. I feel like that's what we've been doing recently, getting all the ducks in a row legally for "the storm" so that it can weather any challenge.
While that is true and President Trump could ignore the order, they are doing everything according to the rule of law. Therefore he will not ignore the order, but instead, get it overturned, according to the law.
That is one of the reasons why this is taking so long, he's not ignoring the law.
This sets a good precedent. Even when the bad guys break the law, the good guys follow the law and will win by using the law.
The example set will show that the law can win even when it's stacked against.
"While that is true and President Trump could ignore the order, they are doing everything according to the rule of law. Therefore he will not ignore the order, but instead, get it overturned, according to the law."
Yes, that's correct. But it's aready legal for DJT to send in the troops. It's this mushminded ultraleft "judge" who's defying the Constitution.
Surely DJT is only tolerating this nonsense for the sake of appearances -- or "optics," if you prefer,.
IMO, though it may not be popular, any delay caused is more to be seen as self inflicted by the state as a whole. An earned punishment by their indirect actions of allowing the judge to be seated in the first place.
President Trump could bypass it by declaring martial law, but it isnt that dire yet, and the optics would be terrible.
Yes ther is a little random crime going on, but nothing so dire that mass public are in danger. Unfortunately that is just the way it is for now.
This sets a good precedent. Even when the bad guys break the law, the good guys follow the law and will win by using the law. The example set will show that the law can win even when it's stacked against.
Immergut’s order is still active until the Ninth Circuit panel rules on DOJ’s emergency stay.
Once that stay hits “granted,” her injunction is frozen, and the executive can legally move the Guard.
So for the moment, she holds the line only because appellate paperwork hasn’t cleared yet.
As soon as it does, control flips back to the Commander-in-Chief.
This is interesting - On June 11, 2018 President Donald J. Trump nominated her to serve as a Judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon (to the seat vacated by Judge Anna J. Brown).
While the National Guard prioritizes its state-level missions, there are instances where control shifts to the federal level. The President of the United States has the authority to federalize the National Guard under specific circumstances. This shift in control places Guard units under the same organizational chain of command as the active-duty military, making the Secretary of Defense their immediate overseer.
Federal control is most commonly exercised:
During wartime or military deployments to support overseas missions.
To enforce federal laws wh****en local and state authorities cannot manage the situation (often requiring congressional approval).
When there is a national emergency that exceeds the state's capacity to manage.
For instance:
Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, National Guard forces were federalized to bolster homeland security efforts.
Units were deployed internationally to support combat operations during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Federalizing the National Guard dramatically changes its operational priorities, focusing entirely on national security over state-specific concerns.
Who controls the National Guard at the federal level? The president of the United States mobilizes the National Guard, but the secretary of defense then controls them.
My wife just had a brilliant idea. "Round up all the illegals and send them to Portland." Portland get what it wants, ICE knows where to find them, Liberals are happy we are not deporting them. We just need to build a big fucking wall to make sure the Portlanders remain in Portland with all their friends.
Insubordinate. Not in her authority per our Constitution.
"The executive branch enforces court decisions: Ultimately, courts rely on the executive branch to enforce their rulings, which can create a situation where a court's decision is difficult to enforce. ". 👈 per Google AI
Where's the Judiciary mentioned in the Constitution related to the National Guard?
👉 Per Google AI...
"Congressional authority
Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to "provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions".
Congress has used this power to pass laws that give the President the authority to call for the National Guard to assist in various federal duties, such as enforcing federal laws, protecting civil rights, and responding to certain emergencies.
Presidential authority
As Commander-in-Chief, the President has the authority to deploy the armed forces, including the National Guard when it is called into federal service.
The President can federalize state National Guard units to respond to domestic emergencies when certain conditions are met, such as a state requesting assistance or an insurrection making it impossible to enforce federal law.
Federal law, such as the Insurrection Act, gives the President the power to use the military to respond to domestic crises.
State authority
The National Guard is a state-controlled militia that operates under a "dual command" system.
In times of peace, state governors typically command the National Guard, using them for emergencies like natural disasters or civil unrest.
When a governor needs assistance for federal-level law enforcement or other federal issues, they can request that the President federalize National Guard troops to take federal command.
This is all to show the sheep that our judiciary legal system is corrupt. She will be overruled by a higher court and this will continue over and over and over again until enough people realize it enjoy the show.
I understand doing everything by "rule of law", while I absolutely understand the corrupt traitors have NEVER done anything legally! They have lied, cheated, stolen, murdered etc.. and continue to do so... But everything we do has to be done legally!
i cant for the life of me understand why trump and Q team havent just gone full Bukele and arrested these corrupt judges constantly over stepping their remit and reach etc.
In all seriousness, I saw something where Schumer said the Left admitted to appointing 235 activist judges to slow down the Trump Administration. This is their plan. It’s failing, but it’s taking time and resources.
So… a judicial branch judge is overstepping her boundaries and is telling the executive branch how to conduct business? Just another corrupt judge that needs to be removed from the bench.
Judicial interprets and ensures what the legislative initiates is legal while the executive executes the legislative initiatives. Judicial has no enforcement powers. She can order all she wants, but has no authority to enforce.
Not any mere judge but a FISA court judge at that. What a coincidence that this criminal institution with their past unmasking shenanigans is still at it.
The swamp is deep and wide. Didn’t the Supreme Court recently upheld POTUS ability to call out National Guard troops?
No ruling yet from scotus, right? Right?
Meanwhile, lawfare goes on and on.
If he pulls out the insurrection act, he can deploy the NG wherever he wants and he set up that program to be able to deploy NG anywhere in the USA in under an hour a few months ago. They can squawk all they want from the bench about it, just going to draw attention to their own wrongdoings.
At some point the swamp has to be rendered powerless.
Interesting that she was appointed by President Trump - On June 11, 2018 President Donald J. Trump nominated her to serve as a Judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon (to the seat vacated by Judge Anna J. Brown).
I think that is exactly the purpose - to appeal this all the way. Have SCOTUS rule on it and the legality of these broad injunctions.
Very likely, once SCOTUS rules on it the lawfare loses teeth. I feel like that's what we've been doing recently, getting all the ducks in a row legally for "the storm" so that it can weather any challenge.
While that is true and President Trump could ignore the order, they are doing everything according to the rule of law. Therefore he will not ignore the order, but instead, get it overturned, according to the law.
That is one of the reasons why this is taking so long, he's not ignoring the law.
This sets a good precedent. Even when the bad guys break the law, the good guys follow the law and will win by using the law.
The example set will show that the law can win even when it's stacked against.
Exactly!
POTUS is being very Precedential. 😉
😆nice
"While that is true and President Trump could ignore the order, they are doing everything according to the rule of law. Therefore he will not ignore the order, but instead, get it overturned, according to the law."
Yes, that's correct. But it's aready legal for DJT to send in the troops. It's this mushminded ultraleft "judge" who's defying the Constitution.
Surely DJT is only tolerating this nonsense for the sake of appearances -- or "optics," if you prefer,.
That works, if you want to look at it that way.
IMO, though it may not be popular, any delay caused is more to be seen as self inflicted by the state as a whole. An earned punishment by their indirect actions of allowing the judge to be seated in the first place.
President Trump could bypass it by declaring martial law, but it isnt that dire yet, and the optics would be terrible.
Yes ther is a little random crime going on, but nothing so dire that mass public are in danger. Unfortunately that is just the way it is for now.
Not only that but all these judges are exposing themselves as doing the bidding of the left-wing lunatics trying to hurt our Country.
As long as the judges abide by the law.
I'm sure there is a sealed indictment with her name on it.
...soon.
"Permenantly" for now... Karin's order will soon be made GONE!
Immergut’s order is still active until the Ninth Circuit panel rules on DOJ’s emergency stay. Once that stay hits “granted,” her injunction is frozen, and the executive can legally move the Guard. So for the moment, she holds the line only because appellate paperwork hasn’t cleared yet. As soon as it does, control flips back to the Commander-in-Chief.
Thank you for the update. Appreciated. God† bless.
Article 2. Insurrection Act.
Anything. Do something :)
Permanent isn’t permanent when there are appeals courts and SCOTUS.
Exactly this.
This will NOT end well for her.....😉🧐😎
She will get overturned, but nothing will happen to her. She will continue to violate the law every chance she gets.
So she thinks.
It will all catch up to her in the end.
"Permanently" 😂
We'll see.
You keep saying "her", look at the face, does that look like a her?
That's a man, man.
Portland judge hijacks Oval Office.
Just another corrupt judge standing on her head and peeing her pants.
No one can do that.
Another problematic activist
This is interesting - On June 11, 2018 President Donald J. Trump nominated her to serve as a Judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon (to the seat vacated by Judge Anna J. Brown).
Per Usamm.com:
Federal control is most commonly exercised:
During wartime or military deployments to support overseas missions. To enforce federal laws wh****en local and state authorities cannot manage the situation (often requiring congressional approval). When there is a national emergency that exceeds the state's capacity to manage. For instance:
Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, National Guard forces were federalized to bolster homeland security efforts. Units were deployed internationally to support combat operations during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Federalizing the National Guard dramatically changes its operational priorities, focusing entirely on national security over state-specific concerns. Who controls the National Guard at the federal level? The president of the United States mobilizes the National Guard, but the secretary of defense then controls them.
My wife just had a brilliant idea. "Round up all the illegals and send them to Portland." Portland get what it wants, ICE knows where to find them, Liberals are happy we are not deporting them. We just need to build a big fucking wall to make sure the Portlanders remain in Portland with all their friends.
Not sure how well the judicial army will do going against the NG.
Oh please. Stop glooming. It is gonna be overturned.
Insubordinate. Not in her authority per our Constitution.
"The executive branch enforces court decisions: Ultimately, courts rely on the executive branch to enforce their rulings, which can create a situation where a court's decision is difficult to enforce. ". 👈 per Google AI
Where's the Judiciary mentioned in the Constitution related to the National Guard?
👉 Per Google AI... "Congressional authority Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to "provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions". Congress has used this power to pass laws that give the President the authority to call for the National Guard to assist in various federal duties, such as enforcing federal laws, protecting civil rights, and responding to certain emergencies. Presidential authority As Commander-in-Chief, the President has the authority to deploy the armed forces, including the National Guard when it is called into federal service. The President can federalize state National Guard units to respond to domestic emergencies when certain conditions are met, such as a state requesting assistance or an insurrection making it impossible to enforce federal law. Federal law, such as the Insurrection Act, gives the President the power to use the military to respond to domestic crises. State authority The National Guard is a state-controlled militia that operates under a "dual command" system. In times of peace, state governors typically command the National Guard, using them for emergencies like natural disasters or civil unrest. When a governor needs assistance for federal-level law enforcement or other federal issues, they can request that the President federalize National Guard troops to take federal command.
I hope she gets a visit by an illegal who doesn’t know who she is before Monday.
I love how all these deepstate judges are finally forcing out the Separation of Powers argument in inventive ways.
wanna bet
ThiS TyMe itS pErmAnent!! REEEEE! 🤣 What a clown 🤡
This is all to show the sheep that our judiciary legal system is corrupt. She will be overruled by a higher court and this will continue over and over and over again until enough people realize it enjoy the show.
This judge commands the National Guard? What gall!
I understand doing everything by "rule of law", while I absolutely understand the corrupt traitors have NEVER done anything legally! They have lied, cheated, stolen, murdered etc.. and continue to do so... But everything we do has to be done legally!
Lmao here we go again
Judge over stepping…
Although maybe everyone watching Portland suffer while Trump cleans up other places will make it nice and clear who is right and wrong
i cant for the life of me understand why trump and Q team havent just gone full Bukele and arrested these corrupt judges constantly over stepping their remit and reach etc.
No such thing as permanently, that's not how courts work
The only thing she's permanently affected is her own reputation.
No standing. Hahahahahaha
In all seriousness, I saw something where Schumer said the Left admitted to appointing 235 activist judges to slow down the Trump Administration. This is their plan. It’s failing, but it’s taking time and resources.
Boasberg , Imergut coming From CABAL PLACES
The catch: who is gonna listen?
Priming the Andy Jackson option
Sounds like a Karin ignoring the FAFO rule on judicial corruption & obstruction, let alone constitutional Oath of Office.
No such thing as permanent unconstitutional injunctions.