This game governments play has to end.
Charlie asked Candace to stop...He knew, who else knows. Everyone that knows is obviously in danger. Everyone is expendable ....
He called her last year and told her the White House requested her to stop pulling the Mr. Bridgette Macron thread. Followed by a personal call from POTUS with the same request.
A better question is what makes it so easy for you to believe. Ive already seen a thousand people like her make claims and ve found dead wrong. The amount of fillowers a person has doesnt validate their words.
Which other ones of those 'thousand' can say this:
-They're being sued by the President of France,
-They were personally phoned by the President of the United States and asked to 'stop talking about Brigitte Macron' because it was affecting France's cooperation with the U.S. President's peace negotiations,
-They were perceived as a threat to the state of I-s-ra-el because of investigating the assassination of their close friend Charlie Kirk,
-Insider knowledge of TPUSA, a heavily I-s-ra-el-funded enterprise and the proof that Charlie was pulling away from their cause because of their blackmail and threats against him, and their treatment of Gazans, and;
-Holding the title of the #1 Podcast in the world right now....
So, she's not like 'a thousand other randos' who make claims.
I believe something when enough factors are present to crate a reasonable belief. I’m not there yet. Even when I do believe something I’m still open to additional information that can alter a belief I have.
The better question is why do you accept this as fact? Is it because it reinforces beliefs you already have? Because that is dangerous.
I didn't mock her, all I'm saying is her word is not God and should not be accepted as such at face value. Also, did you see the recent post about Trump asking Candice Owen to knock it off because she told the deep end to hold her beer. Just keep believing everything you read Buddy, you do you and I'll do me. Study Clifford's Principle, you need to understand it.
Nothing is God, but God, yet you believe in many things, right?
We aren’t saying to absolutely believe something at face value without proof, but to entertain the possibility long enough to fully consider it. Otherwise you may discard the truth early.
What’s so hard to believe about assassins hired to take out those who they deem too popular and a threat to their agenda? This has happened many times. There is a pattern to the powerful.
I cant either. You cant post candace here, who is actually, apparently, the only person, seemingly, TRYING to figure out what is going on without backlash. Like I said a few weeks ago. It is astounding that a board following Q cant support and think maybe she is onto something.
The dismissal Is what hurts us as people IMO. the 24 news cycle has the population ready to move on from anything. We let Israel fucking censor us for crying out loud.
It is astounding that a board following Q cant support and think maybe she is onto something.
Maybe I'm reading the board wrong, but there are a significant number of participants here who actually think Owens is on the money, is a good and credible source. On the other hand, yes, there are others who definitely think that Owens is an attention hound who operates in a manner that makes her much less than credible.
I imagine in a lot of cases, its not simply the assertions that Owens make that turns some people off. It's her whole manner and approach, etc.
I think specifically a board comprised of people who have followed and understood Q (to varying extents) would certainly be ready to question, apply critical thinking and NOT simply buy what someone is selling because it seems to push 'all the right buttons'.
As a cynic myself, (with regards to Owens), the impression you express - "who is actually, apparently, the only person, seemingly, TRYING to figure out what is going on" is the exact image that Owens seeks to present.
To me, she seems to think that her viewpoint and her objectives override anything that the President of the United States is doing. Instead of supporting him and rallying support around him (even while questioning and investigating what is going on, which is a totally legitimate thing to do), Owens, at every turn, raises herself on a pedestal of victimhood and righteousness, which I personally think is one of the key factors that turn people off her and lead them to have serious doubts about her veracity.
Meanwhile, she (seemingly) never presents much substantial evidence to her claims.
Example: Owen claims President Trump called her, but there is no corroborating evidence of that except for her claim. It's a trust me bro situation.
Owen claims that Macron has a hit squad out for her. Is there concrete verifiable evidence to back that up?
Meanwhile, the claims she makes and the approach she presents (which I describe above as victimhood and righteousness) certainly attract certain types of people who are inclined to accept her claims because they sympathize or agreed with that image.
Thus, it works both ways, and you have both fans and critics here.
It's the group around Patrick Byrne / Emerald Robinson.
I have been on the fence about Patrick, because he was CIA, and when he was involved with the Lindell Stop the Steal movement, I was quite disappointed that no-one seemed to react, so I kinda dismissed him, also people on GAW were saying he was a paytriot.
So I referred to it as an intelligence community, but it's really the peeps that are moving and shaking in the patriot sphere.
However, it seems they came up with the goods, about a week before the 2024 election.
I heard macron paid 1.5 million to hit Candace. Is POTUS going to address this or white hats on top of it? I really hope so.. that fucking gay boy and trans wife are murderous psychopaths .. they dated when he was still a minor too.
If Candace gets assassinated, we might as well start organizing and preparing for war. We will not tolerate our journalist and influencers being murdered.
yeah, I think listening to the likes of Owens is certainly going to bring that about...
You really should realize that THIS is the key and core focus of all psyops being run by those you consider your enemies (ie. the DS, the Cabal, the Bankers, the <ahem> Israel mossad?): to inspire lack of faith and distrust in one man, Donald Trump.
The oldest tactic in the book. People must realize: this cannot be accomplished without faith. Trump deserves our faith. If he's not achieving what you want, is it because he isn't trying or doesn't care? Then, deliver to the man with your lack of faith and just watch him be weakened a further step. imo.
I hate to say it, but it takes major events to cause organization for war. Jan 6th was probably the closest we've come and I consider that a warning by the American people. Weve been hoping that the current government will take care of the sick pedo rings without a revolution. We will see. If not. Im not opposed to calling for organization and war over it, but we need real leaders to avtually call for it. But we need to draw a line in the sand that we will prepare for war if they continue this.
So.... are you saying that the Left's narrative around Jan 6 is actually legit, and it was not an organized false flag event to undermine Trump and his movement? That American patriots actually stormed the Capital?
The protest was 100% legit. The capitol storming and agitation to storm the capitol by FBI and then Nancy unlocking the doors and letting people right in, was the setup for their narrative. Im saying that actual protest with a million people there was the warning. In no way was that an insurrection though per their narrative. My point was that it showed how pissed Americans really were/are.
I guess I agree, although I don't know that it should how pissed off people were, but rather, how motivated they were and how much they support and appreciated Trump, and did not want a stolen election.
I love your spirit. Reality is that maybe 5% of people in this country have the stones to kit up and go weapons hot. Of that 5%, maybe 1/3 have the actual physical ability and skills necessary to go Kinetic. Then there is the leadership issue. Have you ever been in a team of Alphas trying to decide who is to play the ‘boss/team lead’? Half the dudes there will either want to be in charge, and/or will question every other order. That is a REAL issue. Read up on the Arnold-Lee-Washington rivalry during the revolutionary war.
Yeah, no doubt it would be an absolute cluster fuck. I dont know how those guys did it back then.. this is one of the issues I have. Its like we are all here, we know whats going on, but how and where do we organize effectively as citizens without being infiltrated, and then march to DC weapons in arms, ready to declare war with a million people? I hope it doesnt come to that, but its something to consider. These Intel agencies dont just get to have free rain to keep screwing over and drugging americans behind the cloth of the America Flag.
Exactly. If they harm Candace, who is next. Then who, and who. No courageous voices will dare be lifted....AND THAT IS THE GOAL.. if we get there.. we will have lost
Rant: Handshake is a rude designation IMO. It implies that someone new here needs reminding, is looked down upon, or to make somebody feelintimidated. It was so much friendlier to say hi, newbie.
yeah, nah. Its simply a statement of the reality that the account in question has no actual track record that can be used to get a handle of the quality of the participant.
if someone raises the 'hi handshake' thing, it's almost always because they are finding something suspect or objectionable in the content the handshake presents.
In all other cases, most participants here are more than welcoming of newcomers. Very much so.
No. He didn't. He just asked her as a courtesy to stop talking smack about Macron's ugly wife so he, Trump, could put the tariff negotiation (or whatever) to bed with less resistance from Macron.
Me three. Watching each drop and seeing a coordinated Zionist effort to discredit her. I used to think Zionist was a “good” word, a la the hymn “We’re Marching to Zion”.
If trump told you to stop because you could die and you blew him off id call you insane too. I have nothing against candace bit there is work that brings us MAGA then there is work that doesnt. Hers exposes the enemy but doesnt really change anything here. If whitehats have it all how much of their operation gets disrupted by information being released too soon etc. Im personnaly not happy she ignored the leader of MAGA. Im also not happy her life may be in danger but i can do zip about it except pray. MAGA is the priority.
He never said she was in danger at all as far as I remember. Maybe we both need to go back and find her podcast and see how she stated it. I remember it being more like this: "Macron won't negotiate in good faith on our peace/tariff/whatever deal unless I convince you to stop talking about his wife, as it hurts her feelings."
As far as I recall, there was no threat or anything beyond that.
Maybe I am naive -- but if she was genuinely threatened shouldn't someone be protecting her? The government spends money on stranger things. I don't know how popular she is but doesn't she have children? Enough children have lost a parent due to assassination recently -- they need to protect this lady.
Yes, she has been threatened by two unrelated parties who are 'passing this information' to her. Andrew Kolvet, the Executive Producer of the Charlie Kirk Show podcast told Candace that both she and Tucker were slated for assassination and that she was supposed to die before Charlie. "It was supposed to be you!" she was told following Charlie's assassination. Andrew (a pro-Zionist J*w) wouldn't share how he had come by this information.
Candace when told, immediately called and informed Tucker and then had a sleepless night of crying. She and hubby then took a trip to Montana or something for a getaway for her to decompress.
Her take is that a combined I-s-ra-eli & French assassin group took out Charlie and now are after her and Tucker.
Pretty sure she pointed out this past week that the Mormons are above the Zionist juice in hierarchy. Could this be true? The Utah connection is highly interesting.
Eh.... have you seen him? I mean... We've heard the term 'Crypto J*w' whereas the person claims to be some religion that is non-J-w, but they operate and look as if they are J-ws.
Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci are two prime examples.
Kolvek sure looks like he is. I remain unpersuaded on his actual 'affiliation'.
All you’ve said is interesting. I was just pointing out I had heard he was LDS & it always surprised me that he was Charlie’s producer because Charlie was Christian. I have never heard that LDS is above the Zionist J*ws in hierarchy. Not completely surprised though knowing how big the LDS church is. We have family members that are LDS so are well aware of their power. I sure wish Candace well & pray she stays safe. Happy Thanksgiving.
Maybe if both these people are in danger they and their families should be given housing on a military base until the threat is over. As long as they are in a safe place, I can't see how any harm could come to them.
The government should protect them until the threat is contained. I am not comfortable with the idea of a mother and a father in danger of being assassinated. We have had enough tragedy.
hey Casually, you seem to be paying close attention to Owens, so can I ask you:
Andrew Kolvek, the Executive Producer of the Charlie Kirk Show podcast told Candace that both she and Tucker were slated for assassination and that she was supposed to die before Charlie. "It was supposed to be you!"
What's the source of this information? Is it Candace's claim? Or has Tucker also corroborated this to his audience? Or did Kolvek also testify that "yes, indeed, I said this and shared this information with Candace?"
Candace when told, immediately called and informed Tucker
Has Tucker confirmed this? You'd think it's pretty big news. According to Grok, "In a November 2025 podcast clip shared on X, Carlson referenced being told in a hospital of a "credible threat" against him and Candace Owens amid fallout from conservative activist Charlie Kirk's alleged "assassination".
But I cannot seem to find it. Grok will return results based on searching X and the web, and sometimes (frequently) reports random claims by people as facts, unless you question further. So, no idea if Tucker actually confirmed that Candace 'phoned and told' him.
And have I heard Tucker confirm this? I don't watch him as often as I'd like, so I haven't heard him confirm it, nor does he have to, nor is he obligated to. And I don't know whether he did or not. However there is this helpful video:
Tucker’s Fiery Response When Asked to Disavow Candace Owens
Note: I misspelled his last name. It is Kolvet, with a 'T'. I've corrected it in my comment.
If you watch him or look at him, you can see the physical evidence of his ethnic J*wish roots. The pro-zionist label is due to his affiliation with TPUSA as a J-wish, pro-Israel member of the Christian TPUSA.
And per a published article Candace said this:
"It's looking to me like Turning Point's apparatus provided an opportunity. Now, who they're actually working for, what they're actually doing, I don't know. But I can tell you it is not about Jesus Christ," Owens said.
The article went on to say: Candace Owens added that, based on everything she had uncovered, there had clearly been a so-called "faith infiltration". She noted that Charlie Kirk would have trusted the people... She went on to insinuate that some people in TPUSA were somehow linked with the alleged military hit.
The surname Kolvet has its historical roots in Eastern Europe, particularly within the Jewish communities of the region. The name is believed to derive from the Yiddish word kolvet...
Thanks for the reply. I usually find your comments worth reading, but in this case, I find the reasoning unconvincing. It's based on a LOT of supposition. Flimsy evidence if you ask me. Which leads me to the question:
How confident would you say you are in your opinion/assertion that Kolvet is a "a pro-Zionist J*w"? (i.e. 100%, 80%, 50%?)
I am only rendering an opinion based on gut feelings. But I could be wrong. There are some J-e-w-s that are anti-I-s-rael and pro-America i.e., on 'our' side. But based solely on the point that he was told there was a hit out on Candace, he had to be 'on the inside' as it were, otherwise they wouldn't have told him. At least that is how it appears.
I am only rendering an opinion based on gut feelings
If the comment "Andrew (a pro-Zionist J*w) wouldn't share" is an opinion, personally, I think it would be better if you made that clear. Because, the way you've written it, by any normal reading, reads as if you are stating a fact.
based solely on the point that he was told there was a hit out on Candace
From what I can see, this is completely Candace's interpretation. According to Grok, "Kolvet has acknowledged the warning in interviews and social media but frames it as a protective gesture amid chaos"
I can easily imagine the following scenario.
Charlie is murdered. Andrew is in shock. he's worried about others who might also be targeted: Owens, because she is also outspoken, and Tucker, also. Both are individuals who radicalized leftists might very much want to harm.
Owens receives the warning. She, being suspicious (genuinely) of Israel as the evil dark Lord who killed Charlie, interprets Andrew's warning of concern as him somehow 'being in the know' and having inside information from .....?
So, for you to accept that Kolvet is on the inside and that 'he told Candace there was a hit' out on her, you have to completely accept Owen's interpretations.
Are these facts? I'm not going to accept them as such when Kolvet's story and Owen's story are different. They are not corroborated. If they agreed, then I could take their word for it. But from what I read, they do not.
Some thoughts. One, if Kolvet is a pro-zionist Jew, then what motive would he (could he) have for 'warning' Candace? He's publicly acknowledged that he did phone her and (offer) a warning to her, something that is (I think) quite plausibly explained by the circumstances that he's Charlie's right hand man, he knows Candace and her activities, and he doesn't want other people to get hurt (killed).
If he is 'on the inside' of some sort of evil network, then he just exposed himself to that very network, and would then be virtually committing either real or professional suicide.
The other thing that I often come back to when dealing with people's theories, interpretations, beliefs, etc, is: are there other plausible explanations for the facts as we know them? I find that in many cases, there are (to the best of my reasoning), leading me to question how and why people come to their own conclusions, interpretations and beliefs.
In this case, IF you love Candace Owens AND you think she's a truly brave person AND you think her motives are pure and noble, THEN it's logical to be sympathetic to her views and also to go to the place of embracing them wholeheartedly as 'facts' in the way that Owens does.
But IF you don't really like Owen's style and approach, AND you think maybe she's not as noble as she appears AND you question what her motives are, then naturally, you are going to be open to and look for other plausible explanations for what is happening, aside from the one's that Owen's promotes.
Why are you so interested anyway? Do tell.
One, I love humanity. Above and beyond my national patriotism, I'm a 'patriot' for the human race. I want to see evil defeated, not just for one country, but for all.
Two, from my years of experience, including research, digging, exposure, etc in the alt-media and truth sphere, I've seen many, many examples of psyops and deceptive practices, some deliberate, some from ignorance, some big, some small, and I am VERY wary of the influence of disinformation and psychological operations targeting the community of which i consider myself a part: the anons/the awakened/the Q tards, etc. of which GAW is a part.
I hold the belief that we (aka the above community, not specifically GAW) are most certainly very targeted, because we are a threat. The Cabal isn't worried about normies. They're not a threat where they are. But anyone rejecting the matrix view of the world that we were all trained to accept and adopt, is a threat. And the Cabal, in the current war for humanity, is conducting a psychological war, and, also, I note, they are EXPERTS at it. Experts.
Three, I am firmly convinced that the greatest threat to the Cabal of evil (with its myriad factions, sectors and actors) is Donald Trump and the international sovereign alliance.
So, I feel like its important to challenge many of our frogs on their views, their conclusions, their attitudes, even when dealing with things like the current situation. Whether its Fuentes, Charlie Kirks murder, Owens, the attempts on Trump's life, accusations thrown at Trump's DOJ (i.e. Patel, etc), The Epstein stuff, and a hundred other issues, I think a LOT of this content is deliberately generated by darker forces in order to demoralize, destabilize, disorient and distract people from the one, most important and critical issue: Protecting and empowering Potus Donald Trump and advancing HIS agenda to destroy the Globalist Cabal & Clique that is the root of all the evil infiltration, lies, control, manipulation, etc. Trump's MAGA is a core part of that Agenda, because a truly free and empowered America is THE biggest threat to the Cabal.
One other piece of the puzzle I failed to elaborate on was the distinct lack of emotion by Kolvet, and frankly the entire team of Charlie's that we watched respond immediately before and after. And later, those who deigned to speak to interviewers on camera. Not once did Kolvet speak with any expected normal reaction to the horrific assassination that he and we watched in real time. This happened to 'his friend' and boss whom he was allegedly very close with.
His face, voice and body language had a flat effect, no excitement, no anger, no sadness. Just a normal day. That lack of emotion signals someone who is a psychopath, and/or is unaffected by the event as he was read-in on it, agreed with it, and was expected to benefit by it and dare I say - was glad for it.
I have studied body language of others and practiced situational awareness my whole life (due to my upbringing) and notice tiny things that go into my evaluation. Charlie's team of security and assistants present that day behaved in incongruous ways that speak volumes.
Some thoughts. One, if Kolvet is a pro-zionist Jew, then what motive would he (could he) have for 'warning' Candace? He's publicly acknowledged that he did phone her and (offer) a warning to her, something that is (I think) quite plausibly explained by the circumstances that he's Charlie's right hand man, he knows Candace and her activities, and he doesn't want other people to get hurt (killed).
Here's my response. I base it on small details and instinct on what I observed based on what is available to read and watch:
When he phoned her and gave her that frightening and shocking piece of information, it was his manner that bothered me and spoke volumes. For instance, he didn't call her and say, "Oh my God, Candace! I just found out something horrible. When I heard it I said, I must call Candace and warn her. She is in danger!"
No. It was more like (paraphrasing of course), "Hello Candace, such terrible news about Charlie... Oh, and by the way, there's a contract out on both you and Tucker ALSO. And it seems the first hit was supposed to be you. Thought you should know. Have a nice day. "
Why would he tell her? To terrify her. To silence her. To stop her from speaking to her millions of followers and continue to influence them. To put a horrible Sword of Damocles over her head. To ruin her. That is why.
Not because he is a friend.
My read-between-the-lines impression as to his intention was kinda like this: "Hey Candy, you are next. There's a highly skilled team of assassins that are going to murder you. You won't be able to protect yourself. Charlie couldn't. Even with an entire team of security. Suck on that. Not telling you how I know. Just, I know, O.K.? Good luck. You'll need it. Oh, Tucker too. We are tired of the two of you ragging on I-s-ra-el. Buh Bye. (winky face emoji)"
Trump tried. Told her to slow down until the threats got contained. She has her own agenda. And of it turns out mossad killed charlie and it got exposed, just what do you think is going to happen?
I respect and admire President Trump but perhaps he is not the best person to approach Ms. Owen about this matter.
In my opinion, (for what little worth it has) IF he would be willing to undertake the task -- the best person would be Mr. Robert Kennedy. He has lived in the shadow of his father's assassination all his life. He understands the effects this kind of thing has on a family long term. He's the only one who can really make her understand the risk she is taking with the long term future of her children.
Now whether or not Mr. Kennedy would be willing to revisit his own trauma to help another avoid the same is another issue altogether. That is asking for service above and beyond the call of duty.
She speaks out against him on the regular- with disdain. She admits she had a handler- perhaps him among others. And she dropped them fast once she realized their scheme.
And nothing sells clicks and $$$ like "I'm so dangerous they want to kill me".
But, if Trump - with others - is actually attempting to take down the Globalist Cabal, then maybe Candace SHOULD shut her mouth? Support Trump? Or does Candace expect to run for US President in 2028, and SHE'LL fix the whole situation?
Either Trump is going to get it done, or he isn't. And if Trump doesn't I do NOT see anyone who will. Not in the USA. So, in the end, all I hear is
"Do not Trust Donald Trump"
Did Candace state that Trump "begged me" or did she say he asked her? Then, who's actually saying Trump 'begged' her? Do we need to spin stuff, if Candace didn't say this exactly? Then why?
And what exactly is an 'exact, word-for-word summary'?
Here is her exact bombshell revelation, word-for-word summary:
She can call them out as much as she likes, but when her conclusion and core message becomes 'don't trust Trump', then she may actually be aiding the <ahem> "Jews and Freemasons", falling very neatly into their trap.
Or.. or… or… the overtone window must be pushed in order for it to become socially acceptable for the “polite” general public to begin to question the narratives we are fed.
This may very well include the participation of a large portion the free-thinking MAGA Base. The same base that rejected vaccines, even when Daddy Trump encouraged it & promoted it.
At best, this is the next phase in the plan, at worst, Trump is actually captured & we are on our own.
I dont think most of us could question the narrative more than we do. Its those due to personalities etc who immediately accept every word from someone not on the inside. Ill bet i could do the media work she is doing and I have an intelligence background. One thing we dont do, we do t report publicly what we know or how we found out about it. That way the bad guys dont harden the target or destroy proof pr build their own narrative. Nope, we hit them and they dont even see it coming. Totally behind the curve. Blasting it all over the internet makes the info useless because there is zero hard proof she can produce thst anyone could legally act on. She doesnt have anything the white hats dont have.
Let’s just say, had we just sat back & “trust the plan” & assume the “the white hats got this” instead of deconstructing the narrative thru Candace’s work & many anons questioning the narrative on social media ; the FBI wouldn’t have re-opened the case.
Now we are learning that missing surveillance video of Tyler Robinson turning himself in to the Washington County Sheriff’s Office just days after allegedly shooting and killing Charlie Kirk. How many people are talking about it? How many people from “conservative inc” are talking about these anomalies?
Mind you, Trump’s FBI was fine with going along with this open & shut case & the pony show would have moved on had it not been for public’s outcry & people fact checking the FBI!.
What good are “white hats” if they go along with cover-ups & assassination plots? With friends like that, who needs enemies?
Had it not been for Candace, most of the world would not have known that Charlie Kirk was turning on Israel and he was beginning to question the” Judeo-Christian” narrative he was fed his entire life. You couldn’t have a prominent“Judeo-Christian” propagandist turn on his masters & become Catholic. Big No-No.
No, part of this battle field is about public perception & I commend Candace for striking at the heart of the Beast & attacking Zionism, Judeo-Freemasonry, 9-11, vaccines, Trump’s duplicity. People on this board will call her a “heretic” for criticizing Trump but he isn’t a King, he isn’t a Messiah, he is a public servant sent to Washington with ONE mandate, DRAIN THE SWAMP. Up to this point, I would also have to agree that he has failed this mandate & he should be held to account by his own base… especially by his base.
That’s not her core message, just a side note said because of how frustrated she is with the lack of the admin’s involvement in the true conspirators of the assassination of CK.
She wouldnt even know what the admins involment is. She isnt rntitled to know and she isnt qualified to know because she runs her mouth. Seriously she thinks trump admin is goi g to keep her.posted on their investigations? We often publicly close cases and then we keep working on them. Bad guys are wasier to investigate if they think no one is looking. You all claim trump is 5D chess player and yet want all the explanations to be easy.
It's refreshing to see your comments. Too much emotion in these threads.
Half of what I just read is true - Paperclip, Monarch, Ultra. The other half I'm not convinced. It seems larpy to me. Maybe I'm wrong but for now, grain of salt as they say.
Are you quoting Candace with "Do not Trust Donald Trump"?
If so, I'd like you to provide your proof of this.
I have heard her say "I have lost faith in the Trump administration". These are two VERY different statements.
She did 'shut her mouth' after Trump asked her too. WATCH all the videos! Did not stop them from killing Charlie. Will not stop them from trying to kill more people. Best to say something while you can.
I think you make a good argument. Yes, I was paraphrasing her, and NOT quoting her.
Btw, what I head her say is "I have lost faith in Trump" and in the instance I heard, it was, to my best recollection, not the 'Trump Administration' but 'Trump'. Either way, its a vote for disbelief or lack of faith in Trump.
In any case, I was quoting myself. This is the message I get from Candace. So, yeah, that's a subjective evaluation, not a quote from her.
But, I should point out, that of various interactions with Owen's material over the years (which I admit, are not that many - I don't like her and (what I perceive of her personality, methodology, motives and approach, etc, turns me off)) - this has been the consistent message. She is not a Trump supporter, she seems to be consistent over the years with not actually believing in Trump.
I'm wondering... has she EVER expressed "I have faith in Trump"?
Considering her position after the 2022 midterms, the Ron De Santis thing (operation?), her complaints that Trump didn't scold the President of France when she was hit with the law suit, etc.
Hope that answers your question (its a good question).
Fwiw, my view is that EVEN if Candace Owens is genuine in her motives (i.e. her core focus is NOT self-promotion or her business or gaining inlooence, etc), then she's a very negative force because, also, in my view, the paramount necessity for America's future is greater, not less support for, and greater, not less faith in, Donald Trump.
But that's because I believe, like Steve Bannon, that Trump is actually an instrument of divine intervention. America has been on the road to disaster for many decades now. The communist infiltration was rampant already by the 70's.
That someone with Trump's skill set, financial strength, personality and value system could rise to become the President and leader of a national movement for restoring America to its original path (which is how I see it), that;'s a plain 100% miracle. imo.
And, like Moses on the mountain putting his life on the line (a 40-day fast will do that to you) to receive God's commandments, Trump needs the people to have faith in him, uplift him, and empower him.
The Israelites lost faith in Moses very quickly, encouraged by an inflooncer, name of Aaron (sadly, Moses' brother) and instead of faith, they embraced disbelief and then worshiped the golden calf god (baal) as the one who brought them out of Egypt. The rest is history.
Owens fails completely, imo, to see the bigger picture, and to understand what is actually required to rescue America from the evil that has overtaken it.
Owens is a strong personality, powerful rhetoric and orator. But are these qualities being used for what America really needs, or are they being used, consciously or unconsciously, in a way that actually undermines the hope of America?
The other one is a personal statement about a group of people, not a direct attack against Trump. She is calling out the traitors in the admin, nothing else, nothing more. Unless you add to her statements.
Don't forget that Q or Trump could have asked her to say that to add to this story. Maybe he really did call & told her to say what she said he said, etc...
This post is bot swarmed. The division and hijacking of the subject. I hate reading this retarded shit. I see this all the time. TBH, IDK, moving on. When I read the shitshow replying and pulling the steering wheel of the post to something else. Sigh...
My opinion? "begged" is 100% spin generated by the so-called project constitution. Which for a start calls into question in my mind about what he is writing.
Yes, I read the post. The poster named 'Project Constitution' who shared her statement was the one who termed it 'begged', not Candace.
Haven't you heard of hyperbole to get clicks? You see these words in paid ads all the time. Words such as:
Breaking! Never before seen! Your jaw will drop! Bombshell! Get it before it sells out! Buy it before the government bans it! You won't believe [ fill in the blank ], Shocking news! Time is running out! The 5-minute trick that will [ fill in the blank ]
Here’s why I love this story: Candace is bringing up Brigette Macron—that brings up her/his story as macron’s teacher and later spouse up. That brings up pedos, trans, operation paperclip and mk ultra in one fell swoop. She’s bringing up Charlie Kirk and the uncertainties around his murder again. In one video that is controversial she’s bringing up many heated topics, all being discussed. She’s a lighting rod and we need them if we’re ever going to get people to wake up so this sh;t can’t happen again.
Hate to day it but she doesnt have 10%- of charlies reach. In fact i dont follow her at all. So i wonder why anyone would wast time taking her out. I also dont see how macron being outed unravels anything in the intel world. Something seriously off with this drama.
According to the analytics firm Podscribe, in November 2025, Candace Owens's podcast was ranked #1 in the world for "Downloads & Views Per Episode" with an average of 3.6 million downloads and views per episode. (Some have as many as 28 million views).
Candace's audience and reach is really big right now. She also has an insider's view to TPUSA (having worked alongside Charlie for 6 years) and is 'noticing' anomalies in words and behavior among the TPUSA staff that only she can, considering her deep friendship and experience with Charlie.
And, she is very well liked and trusted around the world.
Please reconsider. Simply because you don’t follow doesn’t mean she isn’t doing the good work of shining a light on freemasonry, assassinations by foreign heads, destructive Zionism (“bad” Juice/synogogue of Satan), infiltration of organizations, trafficking, and how they are ALL RELATED. She is asking the same questions people with waking up eyes are asking- and she’s dripping it out at a normie friendly pace and at great/ultimate cost to herself and her family.
She said (I think) that the Egyptian planes were found to be owned by a J-e-w-ish entity and that from the two parties that advised her of the hit squad being hired to eliminate her, that it appeared to possibly be a joint effort between Macron's people and Bibi's people. They apparently work together sometimes. That was my take on it.
Im going to say, before I even scroll comments, good luck when posting Candace here. She is the ONLY person publicly looking at this. Most here have just accepted the bs and moved on but are still in 100% trust of the q operation.
Holy shit. I scrolled before posting. The ammount of people dismissing her is insane to me. You'll dismiss someone trying their hardest to figure out whats going on but you still support a government doing Israel's bidding.
"Israel's last"
Its becoming insufferable here with the ammount of people who just want to stick their head in the sand.
What do i think? I think nothing, past the point of the data presented.
Its information. A note of sorts. The debate that ensues is about obtaining new information.
That's all it should be. No emotional or biased interpretation is needed. However, i will add, it does give a path to disclosing Arkancide, to the mainstream. We already know about it.
Most of what you are seeing in the media IS already stuff we know. I see people getting emotional about whats right or wrong.. why? Its gay as fuck.
The French Foreign Legion is comprised of many north African (muzzies) soldiers. The FFL is renowned for recruiting all types of people, regardless of background.
It just sounds like more of Candice's click-bait malarkey to me. But, even if we were to entertain such a theory, there is still zero evidence to show that the known shooter was recruited, and set up as a patsy. Which, is besides the fact that he is also still alive.
For the "patsy" theory to hold water, there needs to be an explanation for why the shooter was left alive as a loose end.
To your last point -- I want proof of life of Tyler (patsy). I am finding it very strange that we have NOT seen this person, except for a video recording here or there. I want to see this guy in the courtroom! For all we know, this guys never existed.
Allow to also say. If we are allowed to know that all this or a close version is true, then the government does not give two shits about any of us. If knowing the truth would ruin some post WW2 narative and we are allowing Americans to be killed because of that then we most certainly are not a sovereign nation.
Correct. But the normies dont know they also infiltrated and influenced many other institutions. Pharmaceutical, biological, chemical, educational, agricultural, environmental, etc...
Paperclip emigrated thousands of SS officers, researchers, and scientists. The US is the 4th Reich, or, at least was until recent years.
If trump is urging you to slow your roll and you have half a brain. You should slow your roll. Trump knows whats up. Candace got warned now she is in fear for her life. We here in GAW have a saying. For some reason we dont think it applies to us. FAFO
As Candace said, had Trump just said, "Hey, this is a serious situation, it's a national security issue. I'm requesting you stop the discussion for safety reasons." She would have done so immediately.
Instead, he first had somebody else ask her to stop and then finally he asked her because, he said, (I'm paraphrasing) "... that it upset Macron's wife and that Macron was being a baby and refusing to negotiate in good faith without that concession."
I think its amazing that some "insuder" reached out to her to warn her risking their own life and she can't shut up about it, putting the insider at even more risk. All for clicks and views.
There are an unbelievable number of questions remaining about his death- with more bizarre details emerging daily. His death being faked was my first hope, but since seeing the evidence about the Egyptian/French/I*raeli planes, it doesn’t make sense. Unless the WH “took him out” first.
The two hospitals each having patient records for CK makes me think it was a prefabricated story with a couple of narratives ready for the public.
Meanwhile nothing about Charlie's assassination even makes sense. Pretty sure it didn't happen.
Then there's.. everyone had to learn about Charlie afterwards which only magnified his microphone.
Why would they do the same to Candace?
The whole Valhalla thing is making me think Charlie and the white hats are working together or something.
What if Charlie pops up alive in the future so the world can learn about fake deaths or something?
Iunno but I'm not buying the official story
I'm waiting for JFK, Elvis, Princess Diana, Michael Jackson, Chester Bennington and several others to reappear together.
JFK Jr and Prince too!!!
Came here to say that. Maybe Lincoln too!
Don't forget Tupac!
Offcial story is painfully not true.
Unfortunately I dont think that was staged.
This game governments play has to end. Charlie asked Candace to stop...He knew, who else knows. Everyone that knows is obviously in danger. Everyone is expendable ....
Charlie didn’t tell Candace to stop.
Its so annoying when people who haven't watched a minute of her investigation comment
He called her last year and told her the White House requested her to stop pulling the Mr. Bridgette Macron thread. Followed by a personal call from POTUS with the same request.
Oh yeah. I was thinking that was more the White House, but forgot it was actually Charlie who made the call.
Some people here could have their hand chopped off and then try to say that didn't happen. What the heck
To be fair I got a boatload of problems, and, no problem, with the Butler Pennsylvania scene.
Emerald Robinson stated this morning that US intel community has confirmed the veracity of the Owens-hit. Russian intllligence also, according to OP.
How exactly did they do that? Confirmed to who? When? Who is the 'US intel community' that supposedly confirmed <that>?
Asking for a fren.
Exactly. How? This is a much more important question than the topic itself.
None of this occurred LOL.
Well, I guess you are the expert.
Probably they know because they are in cahoots or they seem to be in cahoots but they are working for President Trump
Well then, Emerald Robinson says it's verified then who can argue? Sounds like "because it's science" to me.
Thats what i think too. Seems too many people with their finger in the paytriot pie.
LOL, it is what it is.
What makes it so hard for you to believe?
A better question is what makes it so easy for you to believe. Ive already seen a thousand people like her make claims and ve found dead wrong. The amount of fillowers a person has doesnt validate their words.
So tell us what you think happened
'A thousand people like her' you say...?
Which other ones of those 'thousand' can say this:
-They're being sued by the President of France,
-They were personally phoned by the President of the United States and asked to 'stop talking about Brigitte Macron' because it was affecting France's cooperation with the U.S. President's peace negotiations,
-They were perceived as a threat to the state of I-s-ra-el because of investigating the assassination of their close friend Charlie Kirk,
-Insider knowledge of TPUSA, a heavily I-s-ra-el-funded enterprise and the proof that Charlie was pulling away from their cause because of their blackmail and threats against him, and their treatment of Gazans, and;
-Holding the title of the #1 Podcast in the world right now....
So, she's not like 'a thousand other randos' who make claims.
For gosh sake man. Listen to yourself!
I believe something when enough factors are present to crate a reasonable belief. I’m not there yet. Even when I do believe something I’m still open to additional information that can alter a belief I have.
The better question is why do you accept this as fact? Is it because it reinforces beliefs you already have? Because that is dangerous.
No one is saying anything is absolute fact… but you mocked Emerald Robinson as if this person has no credibility, which is why I asked why.
I'm confused. Didn't you just report that Emerald Robinson stated X and Y as facts?
Yes you are confused. No, I didn’t.
Right. it was OP Wellifthisaintdandy.
So, no you didn't but yes, he/she did (state something as a fact).
But for argument's sake, what is an 'absolute' fact. Can a fact be anything other than a fact? Are there absolute facts and relative facts?
either way, thanks for clearing up my misattribution.
I didn't mock her, all I'm saying is her word is not God and should not be accepted as such at face value. Also, did you see the recent post about Trump asking Candice Owen to knock it off because she told the deep end to hold her beer. Just keep believing everything you read Buddy, you do you and I'll do me. Study Clifford's Principle, you need to understand it.
Nothing is God, but God, yet you believe in many things, right?
We aren’t saying to absolutely believe something at face value without proof, but to entertain the possibility long enough to fully consider it. Otherwise you may discard the truth early.
I've said all I care too on this topic, you have a nice day.
What makes it so easy for you? I question everything. Seems most of what ive heard in the past were all blatant lies. So there is that.
What’s so hard to believe about assassins hired to take out those who they deem too popular and a threat to their agenda? This has happened many times. There is a pattern to the powerful.
So now we trust the intelligence community? I can't keep up
I cant either. You cant post candace here, who is actually, apparently, the only person, seemingly, TRYING to figure out what is going on without backlash. Like I said a few weeks ago. It is astounding that a board following Q cant support and think maybe she is onto something.
The dismissal Is what hurts us as people IMO. the 24 news cycle has the population ready to move on from anything. We let Israel fucking censor us for crying out loud.
The censorship is disgusting.
Maybe I'm reading the board wrong, but there are a significant number of participants here who actually think Owens is on the money, is a good and credible source. On the other hand, yes, there are others who definitely think that Owens is an attention hound who operates in a manner that makes her much less than credible.
I imagine in a lot of cases, its not simply the assertions that Owens make that turns some people off. It's her whole manner and approach, etc.
I think specifically a board comprised of people who have followed and understood Q (to varying extents) would certainly be ready to question, apply critical thinking and NOT simply buy what someone is selling because it seems to push 'all the right buttons'.
As a cynic myself, (with regards to Owens), the impression you express - "who is actually, apparently, the only person, seemingly, TRYING to figure out what is going on" is the exact image that Owens seeks to present.
To me, she seems to think that her viewpoint and her objectives override anything that the President of the United States is doing. Instead of supporting him and rallying support around him (even while questioning and investigating what is going on, which is a totally legitimate thing to do), Owens, at every turn, raises herself on a pedestal of victimhood and righteousness, which I personally think is one of the key factors that turn people off her and lead them to have serious doubts about her veracity.
Meanwhile, she (seemingly) never presents much substantial evidence to her claims.
Example: Owen claims President Trump called her, but there is no corroborating evidence of that except for her claim. It's a trust me bro situation.
Owen claims that Macron has a hit squad out for her. Is there concrete verifiable evidence to back that up?
Meanwhile, the claims she makes and the approach she presents (which I describe above as victimhood and righteousness) certainly attract certain types of people who are inclined to accept her claims because they sympathize or agreed with that image.
Thus, it works both ways, and you have both fans and critics here.
Not THE inttelligence community, but a very specific one.
It's the group around Patrick Byrne / Emerald Robinson.
I have been on the fence about Patrick, because he was CIA, and when he was involved with the Lindell Stop the Steal movement, I was quite disappointed that no-one seemed to react, so I kinda dismissed him, also people on GAW were saying he was a paytriot.
So I referred to it as an intelligence community, but it's really the peeps that are moving and shaking in the patriot sphere.
However, it seems they came up with the goods, about a week before the 2024 election.
I heard macron paid 1.5 million to hit Candace. Is POTUS going to address this or white hats on top of it? I really hope so.. that fucking gay boy and trans wife are murderous psychopaths .. they dated when he was still a minor too.
If Candace gets assassinated, we might as well start organizing and preparing for war. We will not tolerate our journalist and influencers being murdered.
Really, but kids kidnapped, raped and murdered didnt move you to prepare? Give me break. Candace her or gone will not make or break maga
I lose faith in Trump daily. All of this smells like.. knowing pearl harbor was imminent and doing nothing about it. .
yeah, I think listening to the likes of Owens is certainly going to bring that about...
You really should realize that THIS is the key and core focus of all psyops being run by those you consider your enemies (ie. the DS, the Cabal, the Bankers, the <ahem> Israel mossad?): to inspire lack of faith and distrust in one man, Donald Trump.
The oldest tactic in the book. People must realize: this cannot be accomplished without faith. Trump deserves our faith. If he's not achieving what you want, is it because he isn't trying or doesn't care? Then, deliver to the man with your lack of faith and just watch him be weakened a further step. imo.
I hate to say it, but it takes major events to cause organization for war. Jan 6th was probably the closest we've come and I consider that a warning by the American people. Weve been hoping that the current government will take care of the sick pedo rings without a revolution. We will see. If not. Im not opposed to calling for organization and war over it, but we need real leaders to avtually call for it. But we need to draw a line in the sand that we will prepare for war if they continue this.
So.... are you saying that the Left's narrative around Jan 6 is actually legit, and it was not an organized false flag event to undermine Trump and his movement? That American patriots actually stormed the Capital?
The protest was 100% legit. The capitol storming and agitation to storm the capitol by FBI and then Nancy unlocking the doors and letting people right in, was the setup for their narrative. Im saying that actual protest with a million people there was the warning. In no way was that an insurrection though per their narrative. My point was that it showed how pissed Americans really were/are.
Hmmm.... Ok, got it.
I guess I agree, although I don't know that it should how pissed off people were, but rather, how motivated they were and how much they support and appreciated Trump, and did not want a stolen election.
By foreign heads of state.
I love your spirit. Reality is that maybe 5% of people in this country have the stones to kit up and go weapons hot. Of that 5%, maybe 1/3 have the actual physical ability and skills necessary to go Kinetic. Then there is the leadership issue. Have you ever been in a team of Alphas trying to decide who is to play the ‘boss/team lead’? Half the dudes there will either want to be in charge, and/or will question every other order. That is a REAL issue. Read up on the Arnold-Lee-Washington rivalry during the revolutionary war.
Yeah, no doubt it would be an absolute cluster fuck. I dont know how those guys did it back then.. this is one of the issues I have. Its like we are all here, we know whats going on, but how and where do we organize effectively as citizens without being infiltrated, and then march to DC weapons in arms, ready to declare war with a million people? I hope it doesnt come to that, but its something to consider. These Intel agencies dont just get to have free rain to keep screwing over and drugging americans behind the cloth of the America Flag.
Exactly. If they harm Candace, who is next. Then who, and who. No courageous voices will dare be lifted....AND THAT IS THE GOAL.. if we get there.. we will have lost
I heard it was 25 million. Saw an ad in soldier of fortune.
It wasn't National Enquirer?
Again, don't be an ass.
Candace's billionaire Jewish husband just outbid Macron and offered $2.0M for someone to "shut her up". /s
He’s Catholic, numb nuts.
He is a devout Catholic and Candace converted to marry him.
She converted after the marriage. George I believe, is a cradle catholic that returned to his faith after their marriage.
Yes was reading her post...https://x.com/RealCandaceO/status/1992976239036871049?s=20
I heard macron invited candace to thanksgiving. I also heard macron is really bill mahers brother.
Come on. Now you are just being an ass.
I trust Candace more than I trust random strangers on this board.
Rant: Handshake is a rude designation IMO. It implies that someone new here needs reminding, is looked down upon, or to make somebody feelintimidated. It was so much friendlier to say hi, newbie.
yeah, nah. Its simply a statement of the reality that the account in question has no actual track record that can be used to get a handle of the quality of the participant.
if someone raises the 'hi handshake' thing, it's almost always because they are finding something suspect or objectionable in the content the handshake presents.
In all other cases, most participants here are more than welcoming of newcomers. Very much so.
I trust trump more. He warned her.
Same. At this point Trump seems like the only one we can fully trust.
No. He didn't. He just asked her as a courtesy to stop talking smack about Macron's ugly wife so he, Trump, could put the tariff negotiation (or whatever) to bed with less resistance from Macron.
I think Candace & Co. are excellent researchers. The Deep State is going hard after her to discredit her. I’m fascinated about what she has uncovered.
Me too....
Me three. Watching each drop and seeing a coordinated Zionist effort to discredit her. I used to think Zionist was a “good” word, a la the hymn “We’re Marching to Zion”.
Hmm……
I wonder if anything lines up with Q drops mentioning bourne identity….
mods sticky this mods please mods thanks mods
https://nitter.net/ProjectConstitu/status/1993027132793225453
All the comments from the Right saying “Candace is insane” really piss me off!
Such comments are from both ends — that’s why it’s called the uniparty.
If trump told you to stop because you could die and you blew him off id call you insane too. I have nothing against candace bit there is work that brings us MAGA then there is work that doesnt. Hers exposes the enemy but doesnt really change anything here. If whitehats have it all how much of their operation gets disrupted by information being released too soon etc. Im personnaly not happy she ignored the leader of MAGA. Im also not happy her life may be in danger but i can do zip about it except pray. MAGA is the priority.
Perhaps the WH have or should have recruited her to run cover for them. She has the skills and patriotic passion.
He never said she was in danger at all as far as I remember. Maybe we both need to go back and find her podcast and see how she stated it. I remember it being more like this: "Macron won't negotiate in good faith on our peace/tariff/whatever deal unless I convince you to stop talking about his wife, as it hurts her feelings."
As far as I recall, there was no threat or anything beyond that.
Underrated comment right here. Shes not a bad person, but she should have listened to Trump.
Maybe I am naive -- but if she was genuinely threatened shouldn't someone be protecting her? The government spends money on stranger things. I don't know how popular she is but doesn't she have children? Enough children have lost a parent due to assassination recently -- they need to protect this lady.
Yes, she has been threatened by two unrelated parties who are 'passing this information' to her. Andrew Kolvet, the Executive Producer of the Charlie Kirk Show podcast told Candace that both she and Tucker were slated for assassination and that she was supposed to die before Charlie. "It was supposed to be you!" she was told following Charlie's assassination. Andrew (a pro-Zionist J*w) wouldn't share how he had come by this information.
Candace when told, immediately called and informed Tucker and then had a sleepless night of crying. She and hubby then took a trip to Montana or something for a getaway for her to decompress.
Her take is that a combined I-s-ra-eli & French assassin group took out Charlie and now are after her and Tucker.
And, yes. Candace has 4 children.
Andrew Kolvek is a Mormon, not a pro-Zionist J*w.
Pretty sure she pointed out this past week that the Mormons are above the Zionist juice in hierarchy. Could this be true? The Utah connection is highly interesting.
Yes.
Eh.... have you seen him? I mean... We've heard the term 'Crypto J*w' whereas the person claims to be some religion that is non-J-w, but they operate and look as if they are J-ws.
Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci are two prime examples.
Kolvek sure looks like he is. I remain unpersuaded on his actual 'affiliation'.
All you’ve said is interesting. I was just pointing out I had heard he was LDS & it always surprised me that he was Charlie’s producer because Charlie was Christian. I have never heard that LDS is above the Zionist J*ws in hierarchy. Not completely surprised though knowing how big the LDS church is. We have family members that are LDS so are well aware of their power. I sure wish Candace well & pray she stays safe. Happy Thanksgiving.
Maybe if both these people are in danger they and their families should be given housing on a military base until the threat is over. As long as they are in a safe place, I can't see how any harm could come to them.
The government should protect them until the threat is contained. I am not comfortable with the idea of a mother and a father in danger of being assassinated. We have had enough tragedy.
hey Casually, you seem to be paying close attention to Owens, so can I ask you:
What's the source of this information? Is it Candace's claim? Or has Tucker also corroborated this to his audience? Or did Kolvek also testify that "yes, indeed, I said this and shared this information with Candace?"
Has Tucker confirmed this? You'd think it's pretty big news. According to Grok, "In a November 2025 podcast clip shared on X, Carlson referenced being told in a hospital of a "credible threat" against him and Candace Owens amid fallout from conservative activist Charlie Kirk's alleged "assassination".
But I cannot seem to find it. Grok will return results based on searching X and the web, and sometimes (frequently) reports random claims by people as facts, unless you question further. So, no idea if Tucker actually confirmed that Candace 'phoned and told' him.
Yes, as I said, this was what Candace has said. Here's a clip of her saying this:
https://www.facebook.com/isaiahrobinn/videos/candace-was-told-there-was-a-threat-on-her-life-and-tucker-carlson/2134218320668906/
And have I heard Tucker confirm this? I don't watch him as often as I'd like, so I haven't heard him confirm it, nor does he have to, nor is he obligated to. And I don't know whether he did or not. However there is this helpful video:
Tucker’s Fiery Response When Asked to Disavow Candace Owens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl_8kXCRXvE
Where is the evidence that Kolvek is a pro-zionist jew? Stew Peters?
Note: I misspelled his last name. It is Kolvet, with a 'T'. I've corrected it in my comment.
If you watch him or look at him, you can see the physical evidence of his ethnic J*wish roots. The pro-zionist label is due to his affiliation with TPUSA as a J-wish, pro-Israel member of the Christian TPUSA.
And per a published article Candace said this:
"It's looking to me like Turning Point's apparatus provided an opportunity. Now, who they're actually working for, what they're actually doing, I don't know. But I can tell you it is not about Jesus Christ," Owens said.
The article went on to say: Candace Owens added that, based on everything she had uncovered, there had clearly been a so-called "faith infiltration". She noted that Charlie Kirk would have trusted the people... She went on to insinuate that some people in TPUSA were somehow linked with the alleged military hit.
Source: https://www.sportskeeda.com/us/podcasts/news-candace-owens-alleges-tpusa-staffer-received-chilling-text-charlie-kirk-saying-they-re-going-kill-me-death
Also:
The surname Kolvet has its historical roots in Eastern Europe, particularly within the Jewish communities of the region. The name is believed to derive from the Yiddish word kolvet...
Source: https://lastnames.myheritage.com/last-name/kolvet
Thanks for the reply. I usually find your comments worth reading, but in this case, I find the reasoning unconvincing. It's based on a LOT of supposition. Flimsy evidence if you ask me. Which leads me to the question:
How confident would you say you are in your opinion/assertion that Kolvet is a "a pro-Zionist J*w"? (i.e. 100%, 80%, 50%?)
I'm curious.
I am only rendering an opinion based on gut feelings. But I could be wrong. There are some J-e-w-s that are anti-I-s-rael and pro-America i.e., on 'our' side. But based solely on the point that he was told there was a hit out on Candace, he had to be 'on the inside' as it were, otherwise they wouldn't have told him. At least that is how it appears.
Why are you so interested anyway? Do tell.
A few things.
If the comment "Andrew (a pro-Zionist J*w) wouldn't share" is an opinion, personally, I think it would be better if you made that clear. Because, the way you've written it, by any normal reading, reads as if you are stating a fact.
From what I can see, this is completely Candace's interpretation. According to Grok, "Kolvet has acknowledged the warning in interviews and social media but frames it as a protective gesture amid chaos"
I can easily imagine the following scenario.
Charlie is murdered. Andrew is in shock. he's worried about others who might also be targeted: Owens, because she is also outspoken, and Tucker, also. Both are individuals who radicalized leftists might very much want to harm.
Owens receives the warning. She, being suspicious (genuinely) of Israel as the evil dark Lord who killed Charlie, interprets Andrew's warning of concern as him somehow 'being in the know' and having inside information from .....?
So, for you to accept that Kolvet is on the inside and that 'he told Candace there was a hit' out on her, you have to completely accept Owen's interpretations.
Are these facts? I'm not going to accept them as such when Kolvet's story and Owen's story are different. They are not corroborated. If they agreed, then I could take their word for it. But from what I read, they do not.
Some thoughts. One, if Kolvet is a pro-zionist Jew, then what motive would he (could he) have for 'warning' Candace? He's publicly acknowledged that he did phone her and (offer) a warning to her, something that is (I think) quite plausibly explained by the circumstances that he's Charlie's right hand man, he knows Candace and her activities, and he doesn't want other people to get hurt (killed).
If he is 'on the inside' of some sort of evil network, then he just exposed himself to that very network, and would then be virtually committing either real or professional suicide.
The other thing that I often come back to when dealing with people's theories, interpretations, beliefs, etc, is: are there other plausible explanations for the facts as we know them? I find that in many cases, there are (to the best of my reasoning), leading me to question how and why people come to their own conclusions, interpretations and beliefs.
In this case, IF you love Candace Owens AND you think she's a truly brave person AND you think her motives are pure and noble, THEN it's logical to be sympathetic to her views and also to go to the place of embracing them wholeheartedly as 'facts' in the way that Owens does.
But IF you don't really like Owen's style and approach, AND you think maybe she's not as noble as she appears AND you question what her motives are, then naturally, you are going to be open to and look for other plausible explanations for what is happening, aside from the one's that Owen's promotes.
One, I love humanity. Above and beyond my national patriotism, I'm a 'patriot' for the human race. I want to see evil defeated, not just for one country, but for all.
Two, from my years of experience, including research, digging, exposure, etc in the alt-media and truth sphere, I've seen many, many examples of psyops and deceptive practices, some deliberate, some from ignorance, some big, some small, and I am VERY wary of the influence of disinformation and psychological operations targeting the community of which i consider myself a part: the anons/the awakened/the Q tards, etc. of which GAW is a part.
I hold the belief that we (aka the above community, not specifically GAW) are most certainly very targeted, because we are a threat. The Cabal isn't worried about normies. They're not a threat where they are. But anyone rejecting the matrix view of the world that we were all trained to accept and adopt, is a threat. And the Cabal, in the current war for humanity, is conducting a psychological war, and, also, I note, they are EXPERTS at it. Experts.
Three, I am firmly convinced that the greatest threat to the Cabal of evil (with its myriad factions, sectors and actors) is Donald Trump and the international sovereign alliance.
So, I feel like its important to challenge many of our frogs on their views, their conclusions, their attitudes, even when dealing with things like the current situation. Whether its Fuentes, Charlie Kirks murder, Owens, the attempts on Trump's life, accusations thrown at Trump's DOJ (i.e. Patel, etc), The Epstein stuff, and a hundred other issues, I think a LOT of this content is deliberately generated by darker forces in order to demoralize, destabilize, disorient and distract people from the one, most important and critical issue: Protecting and empowering Potus Donald Trump and advancing HIS agenda to destroy the Globalist Cabal & Clique that is the root of all the evil infiltration, lies, control, manipulation, etc. Trump's MAGA is a core part of that Agenda, because a truly free and empowered America is THE biggest threat to the Cabal.
That, in a nutshell, is "why I am so interested".
Fair enough.
One other piece of the puzzle I failed to elaborate on was the distinct lack of emotion by Kolvet, and frankly the entire team of Charlie's that we watched respond immediately before and after. And later, those who deigned to speak to interviewers on camera. Not once did Kolvet speak with any expected normal reaction to the horrific assassination that he and we watched in real time. This happened to 'his friend' and boss whom he was allegedly very close with.
His face, voice and body language had a flat effect, no excitement, no anger, no sadness. Just a normal day. That lack of emotion signals someone who is a psychopath, and/or is unaffected by the event as he was read-in on it, agreed with it, and was expected to benefit by it and dare I say - was glad for it.
I have studied body language of others and practiced situational awareness my whole life (due to my upbringing) and notice tiny things that go into my evaluation. Charlie's team of security and assistants present that day behaved in incongruous ways that speak volumes.
You asked me this:
Some thoughts. One, if Kolvet is a pro-zionist Jew, then what motive would he (could he) have for 'warning' Candace? He's publicly acknowledged that he did phone her and (offer) a warning to her, something that is (I think) quite plausibly explained by the circumstances that he's Charlie's right hand man, he knows Candace and her activities, and he doesn't want other people to get hurt (killed).
Here's my response. I base it on small details and instinct on what I observed based on what is available to read and watch:
When he phoned her and gave her that frightening and shocking piece of information, it was his manner that bothered me and spoke volumes. For instance, he didn't call her and say, "Oh my God, Candace! I just found out something horrible. When I heard it I said, I must call Candace and warn her. She is in danger!"
No. It was more like (paraphrasing of course), "Hello Candace, such terrible news about Charlie... Oh, and by the way, there's a contract out on both you and Tucker ALSO. And it seems the first hit was supposed to be you. Thought you should know. Have a nice day. "
Why would he tell her? To terrify her. To silence her. To stop her from speaking to her millions of followers and continue to influence them. To put a horrible Sword of Damocles over her head. To ruin her. That is why.
Not because he is a friend.
My read-between-the-lines impression as to his intention was kinda like this: "Hey Candy, you are next. There's a highly skilled team of assassins that are going to murder you. You won't be able to protect yourself. Charlie couldn't. Even with an entire team of security. Suck on that. Not telling you how I know. Just, I know, O.K.? Good luck. You'll need it. Oh, Tucker too. We are tired of the two of you ragging on I-s-ra-el. Buh Bye. (winky face emoji)"
Trump tried. Told her to slow down until the threats got contained. She has her own agenda. And of it turns out mossad killed charlie and it got exposed, just what do you think is going to happen?
I respect and admire President Trump but perhaps he is not the best person to approach Ms. Owen about this matter.
In my opinion, (for what little worth it has) IF he would be willing to undertake the task -- the best person would be Mr. Robert Kennedy. He has lived in the shadow of his father's assassination all his life. He understands the effects this kind of thing has on a family long term. He's the only one who can really make her understand the risk she is taking with the long term future of her children.
Now whether or not Mr. Kennedy would be willing to revisit his own trauma to help another avoid the same is another issue altogether. That is asking for service above and beyond the call of duty.
I think Candace is still sus. Shapiro was/is her handler.
Why do you say this? What proof is there?
As much proof as robinson gave you.
You're both spelling evidence wrong.
Also, that was then, this is now. There is a reason why she left that snake-pit.
You don't listen to her at lol. She trolls Ben Shapiro....
She speaks out against him on the regular- with disdain. She admits she had a handler- perhaps him among others. And she dropped them fast once she realized their scheme.
Not that this death threat gives her , or more importantly the new /old rulers of the world / MK Ultra / CIA storyline MORE credibility or anything.
I think its dumb amd people are duped.
Candace has a saying for this; 'Everything is fake and gay.' I think you would LOVE Candace if you gave her a chance. haha
Just ribbing ya a bit SOG.... I know you won't, but it's okay. We'll see what comes out in the wash.
I dunno. All I hear is...
"Do not Trust Donald Trump"
Everything else is fluff.
And nothing sells clicks and $$$ like "I'm so dangerous they want to kill me".
But, if Trump - with others - is actually attempting to take down the Globalist Cabal, then maybe Candace SHOULD shut her mouth? Support Trump? Or does Candace expect to run for US President in 2028, and SHE'LL fix the whole situation?
Either Trump is going to get it done, or he isn't. And if Trump doesn't I do NOT see anyone who will. Not in the USA. So, in the end, all I hear is
"Do not Trust Donald Trump"
Did Candace state that Trump "begged me" or did she say he asked her? Then, who's actually saying Trump 'begged' her? Do we need to spin stuff, if Candace didn't say this exactly? Then why?
And what exactly is an 'exact, word-for-word summary'?
Although.... hmmm... Maybe Candace is Q....
Someone has to call out Jews & Freemasons. Is anyone of any social clout within Trumps circle doing it? Nope.
Its a fair enough point, but...
She can call them out as much as she likes, but when her conclusion and core message becomes 'don't trust Trump', then she may actually be aiding the <ahem> "Jews and Freemasons", falling very neatly into their trap.
Or.. or… or… the overtone window must be pushed in order for it to become socially acceptable for the “polite” general public to begin to question the narratives we are fed.
This may very well include the participation of a large portion the free-thinking MAGA Base. The same base that rejected vaccines, even when Daddy Trump encouraged it & promoted it.
At best, this is the next phase in the plan, at worst, Trump is actually captured & we are on our own.
I dont think most of us could question the narrative more than we do. Its those due to personalities etc who immediately accept every word from someone not on the inside. Ill bet i could do the media work she is doing and I have an intelligence background. One thing we dont do, we do t report publicly what we know or how we found out about it. That way the bad guys dont harden the target or destroy proof pr build their own narrative. Nope, we hit them and they dont even see it coming. Totally behind the curve. Blasting it all over the internet makes the info useless because there is zero hard proof she can produce thst anyone could legally act on. She doesnt have anything the white hats dont have.
Let’s just say, had we just sat back & “trust the plan” & assume the “the white hats got this” instead of deconstructing the narrative thru Candace’s work & many anons questioning the narrative on social media ; the FBI wouldn’t have re-opened the case.
🔘https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7ga2OSwKNQ
Now we are learning that missing surveillance video of Tyler Robinson turning himself in to the Washington County Sheriff’s Office just days after allegedly shooting and killing Charlie Kirk. How many people are talking about it? How many people from “conservative inc” are talking about these anomalies?
Mind you, Trump’s FBI was fine with going along with this open & shut case & the pony show would have moved on had it not been for public’s outcry & people fact checking the FBI!. What good are “white hats” if they go along with cover-ups & assassination plots? With friends like that, who needs enemies?
Had it not been for Candace, most of the world would not have known that Charlie Kirk was turning on Israel and he was beginning to question the” Judeo-Christian” narrative he was fed his entire life. You couldn’t have a prominent“Judeo-Christian” propagandist turn on his masters & become Catholic. Big No-No.
No, part of this battle field is about public perception & I commend Candace for striking at the heart of the Beast & attacking Zionism, Judeo-Freemasonry, 9-11, vaccines, Trump’s duplicity. People on this board will call her a “heretic” for criticizing Trump but he isn’t a King, he isn’t a Messiah, he is a public servant sent to Washington with ONE mandate, DRAIN THE SWAMP. Up to this point, I would also have to agree that he has failed this mandate & he should be held to account by his own base… especially by his base.
That’s not her core message, just a side note said because of how frustrated she is with the lack of the admin’s involvement in the true conspirators of the assassination of CK.
She wouldnt even know what the admins involment is. She isnt rntitled to know and she isnt qualified to know because she runs her mouth. Seriously she thinks trump admin is goi g to keep her.posted on their investigations? We often publicly close cases and then we keep working on them. Bad guys are wasier to investigate if they think no one is looking. You all claim trump is 5D chess player and yet want all the explanations to be easy.
What do you think MTG just did?
It's refreshing to see your comments. Too much emotion in these threads.
Half of what I just read is true - Paperclip, Monarch, Ultra. The other half I'm not convinced. It seems larpy to me. Maybe I'm wrong but for now, grain of salt as they say.
If [they] really wanted her dead... she would be.
kek, I'm glad you are refreshed! Because apparently there are 5 frogs who had an alternative response....
Most likely
Are you quoting Candace with "Do not Trust Donald Trump"?
If so, I'd like you to provide your proof of this.
I have heard her say "I have lost faith in the Trump administration". These are two VERY different statements.
She did 'shut her mouth' after Trump asked her too. WATCH all the videos! Did not stop them from killing Charlie. Will not stop them from trying to kill more people. Best to say something while you can.
Thank you.
I think you make a good argument. Yes, I was paraphrasing her, and NOT quoting her.
Btw, what I head her say is "I have lost faith in Trump" and in the instance I heard, it was, to my best recollection, not the 'Trump Administration' but 'Trump'. Either way, its a vote for disbelief or lack of faith in Trump.
In any case, I was quoting myself. This is the message I get from Candace. So, yeah, that's a subjective evaluation, not a quote from her.
But, I should point out, that of various interactions with Owen's material over the years (which I admit, are not that many - I don't like her and (what I perceive of her personality, methodology, motives and approach, etc, turns me off)) - this has been the consistent message. She is not a Trump supporter, she seems to be consistent over the years with not actually believing in Trump.
I'm wondering... has she EVER expressed "I have faith in Trump"?
Considering her position after the 2022 midterms, the Ron De Santis thing (operation?), her complaints that Trump didn't scold the President of France when she was hit with the law suit, etc.
Hope that answers your question (its a good question).
Fwiw, my view is that EVEN if Candace Owens is genuine in her motives (i.e. her core focus is NOT self-promotion or her business or gaining inlooence, etc), then she's a very negative force because, also, in my view, the paramount necessity for America's future is greater, not less support for, and greater, not less faith in, Donald Trump.
But that's because I believe, like Steve Bannon, that Trump is actually an instrument of divine intervention. America has been on the road to disaster for many decades now. The communist infiltration was rampant already by the 70's.
That someone with Trump's skill set, financial strength, personality and value system could rise to become the President and leader of a national movement for restoring America to its original path (which is how I see it), that;'s a plain 100% miracle. imo.
And, like Moses on the mountain putting his life on the line (a 40-day fast will do that to you) to receive God's commandments, Trump needs the people to have faith in him, uplift him, and empower him.
The Israelites lost faith in Moses very quickly, encouraged by an inflooncer, name of Aaron (sadly, Moses' brother) and instead of faith, they embraced disbelief and then worshiped the golden calf god (baal) as the one who brought them out of Egypt. The rest is history.
Owens fails completely, imo, to see the bigger picture, and to understand what is actually required to rescue America from the evil that has overtaken it.
Owens is a strong personality, powerful rhetoric and orator. But are these qualities being used for what America really needs, or are they being used, consciously or unconsciously, in a way that actually undermines the hope of America?
Different words same meaning.
Wrong.
One would have been a directive, if said.
The other one is a personal statement about a group of people, not a direct attack against Trump. She is calling out the traitors in the admin, nothing else, nothing more. Unless you add to her statements.
Don't forget that Q or Trump could have asked her to say that to add to this story. Maybe he really did call & told her to say what she said he said, etc...
But if that's the case the WH are protecting her.
This post is bot swarmed. The division and hijacking of the subject. I hate reading this retarded shit. I see this all the time. TBH, IDK, moving on. When I read the shitshow replying and pulling the steering wheel of the post to something else. Sigh...
About as much- if not more sense - than anything else out there. IMHO Barack Obama is a child of that program as well
Trump begged----that is an Oxymoron. Trump doesn't beg!
My opinion? "begged" is 100% spin generated by the so-called project constitution. Which for a start calls into question in my mind about what he is writing.
Who said Trump begged? Not Candace.
Did you read the X post?
BREAKING: CANDACE OWENS Just Exposed Why Trump Personally Begged Her to Shut Up About Brigitte Macron
Yes, I read the post. The poster named 'Project Constitution' who shared her statement was the one who termed it 'begged', not Candace.
Haven't you heard of hyperbole to get clicks? You see these words in paid ads all the time. Words such as:
Breaking! Never before seen! Your jaw will drop! Bombshell! Get it before it sells out! Buy it before the government bans it! You won't believe [ fill in the blank ], Shocking news! Time is running out! The 5-minute trick that will [ fill in the blank ]
And so on.
I really don't know who said it, I just posted Trump does not beg. I don't trust Candace anyway. I believe she plays both sides. IMHO
Here’s why I love this story: Candace is bringing up Brigette Macron—that brings up her/his story as macron’s teacher and later spouse up. That brings up pedos, trans, operation paperclip and mk ultra in one fell swoop. She’s bringing up Charlie Kirk and the uncertainties around his murder again. In one video that is controversial she’s bringing up many heated topics, all being discussed. She’s a lighting rod and we need them if we’re ever going to get people to wake up so this sh;t can’t happen again.
Hate to day it but she doesnt have 10%- of charlies reach. In fact i dont follow her at all. So i wonder why anyone would wast time taking her out. I also dont see how macron being outed unravels anything in the intel world. Something seriously off with this drama.
Her podcast is massive. Her reach is tremendous amongst young trad women.
She's not shutting up about Israel killing Charlie either.
God bless her.
I hate to tell you, but you are out of the loop.
According to the analytics firm Podscribe, in November 2025, Candace Owens's podcast was ranked #1 in the world for "Downloads & Views Per Episode" with an average of 3.6 million downloads and views per episode. (Some have as many as 28 million views).
Candace's audience and reach is really big right now. She also has an insider's view to TPUSA (having worked alongside Charlie for 6 years) and is 'noticing' anomalies in words and behavior among the TPUSA staff that only she can, considering her deep friendship and experience with Charlie.
And, she is very well liked and trusted around the world.
Something is off about you.
You don’t follow her so you don’t see why anyone would take her out?
Are you listening to yourself??
Please reconsider. Simply because you don’t follow doesn’t mean she isn’t doing the good work of shining a light on freemasonry, assassinations by foreign heads, destructive Zionism (“bad” Juice/synogogue of Satan), infiltration of organizations, trafficking, and how they are ALL RELATED. She is asking the same questions people with waking up eyes are asking- and she’s dripping it out at a normie friendly pace and at great/ultimate cost to herself and her family.
Wait, so Charlie was killed by French death squads now? I thought like 2 weeks ago it was Israeli death squads, and before that it was Iranian.
She said (I think) that the Egyptian planes were found to be owned by a J-e-w-ish entity and that from the two parties that advised her of the hit squad being hired to eliminate her, that it appeared to possibly be a joint effort between Macron's people and Bibi's people. They apparently work together sometimes. That was my take on it.
She never said anything about Israeli or Iranian death squads if thats what you are implying
Im going to say, before I even scroll comments, good luck when posting Candace here. She is the ONLY person publicly looking at this. Most here have just accepted the bs and moved on but are still in 100% trust of the q operation.
Holy shit. I scrolled before posting. The ammount of people dismissing her is insane to me. You'll dismiss someone trying their hardest to figure out whats going on but you still support a government doing Israel's bidding.
"Israel's last"
Its becoming insufferable here with the ammount of people who just want to stick their head in the sand.
"Bye bye"
"Bye"
There saved you some time.
What do i think? I think nothing, past the point of the data presented.
Its information. A note of sorts. The debate that ensues is about obtaining new information.
That's all it should be. No emotional or biased interpretation is needed. However, i will add, it does give a path to disclosing Arkancide, to the mainstream. We already know about it.
Most of what you are seeing in the media IS already stuff we know. I see people getting emotional about whats right or wrong.. why? Its gay as fuck.
The French Foreign Legion is comprised of many north African (muzzies) soldiers. The FFL is renowned for recruiting all types of people, regardless of background.
It just sounds like more of Candice's click-bait malarkey to me. But, even if we were to entertain such a theory, there is still zero evidence to show that the known shooter was recruited, and set up as a patsy. Which, is besides the fact that he is also still alive.
For the "patsy" theory to hold water, there needs to be an explanation for why the shooter was left alive as a loose end.
To your last point -- I want proof of life of Tyler (patsy). I am finding it very strange that we have NOT seen this person, except for a video recording here or there. I want to see this guy in the courtroom! For all we know, this guys never existed.
And his family and friends have basically been muted.
Along with 99% of those in attendance that day. Gag orders and device confiscation.
Again...another person with a take on candace that appears to have probably watched very little of her digging.
ItS CliCkBaIt
Allow to also say. If we are allowed to know that all this or a close version is true, then the government does not give two shits about any of us. If knowing the truth would ruin some post WW2 narative and we are allowing Americans to be killed because of that then we most certainly are not a sovereign nation.
Isnt Operation Paperclip one of the worst kept secrets? Everyone (in here & a few normies) know the krauts were part of nasa after WW2.
Correct. But the normies dont know they also infiltrated and influenced many other institutions. Pharmaceutical, biological, chemical, educational, agricultural, environmental, etc...
Paperclip emigrated thousands of SS officers, researchers, and scientists. The US is the 4th Reich, or, at least was until recent years.
If trump is urging you to slow your roll and you have half a brain. You should slow your roll. Trump knows whats up. Candace got warned now she is in fear for her life. We here in GAW have a saying. For some reason we dont think it applies to us. FAFO
As Candace said, had Trump just said, "Hey, this is a serious situation, it's a national security issue. I'm requesting you stop the discussion for safety reasons." She would have done so immediately.
Instead, he first had somebody else ask her to stop and then finally he asked her because, he said, (I'm paraphrasing) "... that it upset Macron's wife and that Macron was being a baby and refusing to negotiate in good faith without that concession."
She certainly knows hoe to get attention
I think its amazing that some "insuder" reached out to her to warn her risking their own life and she can't shut up about it, putting the insider at even more risk. All for clicks and views.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/willing-to-provide-candace-owens-doubles-down-on-france-charlie-kirk-theory-after-telegram-ceo-says-its-entirely-plausible/articleshow/125544277.cms
There are an unbelievable number of questions remaining about his death- with more bizarre details emerging daily. His death being faked was my first hope, but since seeing the evidence about the Egyptian/French/I*raeli planes, it doesn’t make sense. Unless the WH “took him out” first.
The two hospitals each having patient records for CK makes me think it was a prefabricated story with a couple of narratives ready for the public.
Came back to say that people following CO on YT are finding her content buried/not easily accessible. Can confirm- gotta be over target.