Charlie Kirk told several of his friends and advisors that he was leaving the pro-I=sr-ael cause and that his J-e-wish donors were pulling their money and sending him threatening emails and text messages and that he felt that they (I=s-ra-el) was going to kill him. He was invited/coerced to go to the Hamptons for the weekend shortly before his murder so that his donors and J-e-w-ish advisors could pressure Charlie to change his mind and promote Z-i-onism. He felt threatened and under duress. While there, B-i-b-i N. called him and invited him to fly for free to the 'I' country to be 're-educated' about his choice to no longer promote the 'I' country, and if he went and agreed to go back to promoting them, B-i-b-i would 'take him to the next level' and gift TPUSA $150 million dollars. Charlie turned it all down.
His staff and security behaved completely abnormally and complicit the day of his murder and every day after his murder. They were caught in many contradictory statements and downright lies.
Charlie's wife has seemed giddy and happy and unlike any 'grieving widow' any of us has ever seen.
Geofencing showed 13 cell phones present during the murder that were I=s-ra-el-based cell phones.
The man who stood up and cheered when he was shot is J-e-w-ish. The old guy 'Zinn' who stood up and said, "I shot him, I did it. Shoot me!' was J-e-w-ish and told others he was going to get paid for causing a distraction so the actual 'shooter' could get away.
The hospital Charlie was taken to, the surgeon who examined him, and the name of the building that the alleged shooter was perched upon were all Google searched a month beforehand from a location in Tel Aviv.
Everything points to the 'I' country. And shame on you for trying to gaslight us to think otherwise.
Excuse me, who the fuck do you think you're talking to....
Firstly it's a repost. Not mine....DOES IT LOOK LIKE MY POST????
Secondly, it's your fucking OPINION....Show me facts that ISRAEL MURDERED CHARLIE!!!!!!
just like Arse holes, we all have one....
🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
👌👌👌 People need to LOOK before they decide to rant and rave....
AND UNTIL I see definitive evidence on who Killed Charlie, EVERYTHING else is JUST OPINIONS........ 🥱🤔🙄
Maybe you should invest the time to listen to Candace. She has most of the receipts, though she is not alone. Only a low information person would discount the vast amount of information she has gathered together as she does the job the FBI won't do.
To me, first impression, it seems he is screaming at Ashton. However, in his last sentence he says "you" are trying to gaslight us. He could still be referring to Ashton. I wouldn't take his remarks personally.
The Psywar is getting thick.
It is a frazzled mess at the center. People are trying to read between the lines. Following Trump's lead is the best alternative but trust your gut feelings.
President Trump could be levying his own psywar against both sides simultaneously, which makes it even more confusing. I have a feeling Trump doesn't want the entire country becoming anti-Zionist at this stage of the game, saving Israel for last could still be part of the plan. If you give your enemy enough latitude, they will dig their own grave eventually.
I know. Erika Kirk smiled at the wrong time. The baby cried at the wrong time. People gave too much money to TPUSA. Plenty of evidence. Ask this: Why WOULD Israel care that much about one man's opinion?
Because that man is swaying the minds of millions - its a powerful voice, a calm, rational one, that was beginning to rationalize that we SHOULDNT be supporting Israel
18 days before his assassination he finally started questioning whether or not they can actually be trusted.
Everything that CasuallyObservant pointed out (except for the oddities in human behavior) are completely verifiable facts
I have no idea why Israel would care that much about one man’s opinion. The question I have is why you care so much, to the point of swearing and name calling and having a complete meltdown tantrum when someone disagrees with you. Do you always act this way on here or is it only in regards to this topic?
Charlie had a lot of future White House momentum. It behooved anyone who wanted to cut him down, to do so before he grew more powerful. As a campus touring debate persona, he was easier to “get at” than he would be if his popularity grew. Just a thought.
Isn't that always the way? Obviously, somebody decided to kill him, but seriously, who wouldn't act weird in that situation??? And the attacks on his wife are astonishingly evil, Candace Owens is either round the fucking bend or the scum of the earth, there is no other explanation for her behaviour, she should do this she should do that??? Says who? She wasn't pregnant, she had a fake pregnancy stomach?????????
And Charlie never caught on that his fucking wife wasn't pregnant twice????
I am over this nonsense, the infiltrators into the Q and MAGA movement are identifying themselves in numbers now.
Why, for the love of God, are you using these moronic abbreviations? you are not posting on the NY Times you bellend. Also, the attacks on his wife are beyond fucking stupid, who decides how people grieve ? you?
Owens has lost the fucking plot as far as I can see. Remember this is a Q board, we were repeatedly warned that we have PAYTRIOTS everywhere.
If you are correct, then Charlie was a fucking moron who could not see that his wife was an asset and also not pregnant, according to some of the utter fucking drivel i have seen lately.
Please fuck off back to the CIA and do fucking better
These threads always get hilariously ratio'd. Either no engagement or engagement opposite the narrative being pushed, which usually involves a lot of girly emotions from the narrative pushers.
To be fair, anytime Israel is mentioned as having performed some kind of act of unseemly behavior, the Israel-is-responsible-for-every-ill-on-the-planet folks upvote it, doesn't matter the subject or whether there is any proof. They have to be guilty just by being Israel. I am not saying they haven't done awful things but it's not hard to get a bunch of upvotes on comments like that. JS.
Charlie’s wife happy and giddy (I don’t see that exactly) doesn’t mean anything. Everyone grieves differently. She can’t cry forever. That would be weird too and annoying. As a Christian she knows Charlie is in a better place, the Kingdom of Heaven. That should bring joy to any Christian.
I don't follow Owens or Tucker since they are actively dividing MAGA and it all is meaningless distraction in my view. What if Israel did it? What you gonna do about it? Stand against MAGA and Trump because you hate the Jews? Trump is leading a war against the Cabal which includes every government in Europe, Asia and includes Israel and our own government. Do not give these Paytriots a voice and be distracted from the main mission which is their real agenda. IMHO
Stand against MAGA and Trump because you hate the Jews? Trump is leading a war against the Cabal which includes every government in Europe, Asia and includes Israel and our own government.
I don’t like being lied to. My senses tingle when I smell one, and this whole Charlie Kirk thing stank from the beginning like a whale carcass rotting on a beach. Too many things didn’t add up, and too many things looked suspicious. The fake text thread was too laughable to be real, and to me it was proof not only that the FBI was actively covering things up, but that they wanted us to know they were doing it. That wasn’t a mistake written by a clueless old man at a desk in the bowels of the agency. That was a communication to let us know what was really going on.
Then there was the suddenly put-together grand memorial like the mother of all rallies, the glamorous “Tammy Faye Bakker” beauty queen widow in sequins, the strangely missing kids, the paving over of the crime scene, the whisking away of TPUSA cameras, the scrambling of Patel and Bongino, the public denial of culpability from Netanyahu himself—twice! Charlie looking distracted and nervous that fateful day. It was like, well, a movie. When Candice started to put things together, she caught me by my dangling curiosity, and I payed attention for a while until she began to seem batshit crazy. (I do believe the “Bridgette Macron is a man” stuff because the threats of French legal retribution were quickly withdrawn when Candice put up her dukes.) Now Blumenthal is to blame for making everything up? A conspiracy? Who’d have thunk it?
I don’t believe everything Blumenthal said was made up. Remember, if you want to poison people you have to put it in real food or drink. You can’t just give them a big glass of Draino and expect to have a successful poisoning. Blumenthal caught me, too, for a minute, but when I saw him suddenly showing up EVERYWHERE with that smug smile and an almost supernatural confidence about what he was saying, I quickly withdrew the tentative trust I gave him for the sake of satisfying my curiosity. I learned what sudden everywhere-being was about when obscure Illinois politician Obama suddenly popped up out of nowhere and the media went all out to make him a star.
I think Charlie WAS turning away from Israeli support (let’s say Israeli-adjacent for plausible deniability) because it’s obvious this was happening there at the end from clips and interviews. They (meaning associated persons here and in Israel working on the same thing for different reasons) WERE trying to get control of the TPSUA organization to make it something Charlie never meant it to be, and he resented being bullied, so he stuck them in the eye putting Tucker onstage in Tampa. Predictably, a few weeks later he was dead in a public execution.
I have nothing against Jews or even Israel, but don’t tell me that casting a critical eye on what they do is anti-semitism. That tactic doesn’t work anymore. Israel has a deep state, too, and the Israeli government works really hard to influence American public opinion and politicians in the government. Scrutiny is warranted.
All that being said, I wouldn't be surprised if Charlie was a whole lot less than dead and safely hidden away in a white hat government-sponsored protection program.
What got me going down the Charlie Kirk assassination rabbit hole were the things caught on camera at the exact moment of bullet impact. The thought that a 30-06 bullet didn’t leave an exit wound also seemed suspect.
If you look closely, there is a guy in the audience wearing a white shirt frantically shaking something like he is trying to get it to work while pointing it at Charlie at the exact time of impact.
One of these things by themselves could just be coincidence but all three were done by older adults in a sea of young adults. Not a coincidence in my mind.
I still think this assassination was similar to the Butler attempt on Trump. Whoever was responsible for security, set things up to create a hole or a security blind spot for someone(patsy) to carry out the shooting.
This thinking may have opened me up to psyops as things went on but I regret none of it.
George Zinn claimed to nurses at the hospital that he would be getting paid.
Seed the crowd with a bunch of potential patsies and then let it all play out. One of the guys will take the fall while the truth of what happened gets obfuscated.
True, I didn’t even mention Zinn or that kid that was jumping around like his ass was on fire. There were plenty of things that could raise an eyebrow well before Candace or Bloomenthall got involved.
I'm concerned at why this post is stickied. For a board that typically entertains the possibility of a conspiracy with any given event, it has been closed to the idea that Kirk's assassination was anything but the fedslop narrative.
Posts aren’t necessarily our viewpoint and are often just reports of what’s being said out there. Whoever stickied this one might not think it’s valid but might think we should keep our fingers on the pulse. The claim is weird- trying to acquit Israel by throwing jew Blumenthal under the bus.
Not worth all this emotion. Its playing right into Satans hands. At the end of the day this is noise not signal and its made worse by numbskulls (paid influncers whose job is to confuse and conflate and insert bullshit to the conversation) and then multiplied again by other numbskulls who care but actually couldnt even verbalize why they care. It was someones op from the moment the trigger was pulled, all of it designed to elicit exactly the response you see in this thread.
Whether Candace or Tucker are right or wrong doesnt matter to the plan in any way shape or form. I have completely ignored it since the week after it happened and my understanding of the problem and Trumps solutions has not suffered in the least. Israel is being saved for last for a very specific reason. This event doesnt change that.
YOU EITHER TRUST TRUMP AND THE Q WHITEHAT TEAM OR YOU DONT. Your choice.
A division tactic. They know there is a debate within the right about how much we should be aligned with Israel. We need to understand that what Q meant by "Israel" was the Globalist Cabal that was nesting inside Israel, not the nation of Israel itself. Aligning with Israel to achieve common goals in the world, such as ridding the world of the Islamic Republic, does not mean we have succumbed to thos Cabal in side Israel, which i believe to have been seriously weakened in thr last 2 years.
Winner winner chicken dinner. At it's simplest core, that is exactly what this article is attempting to do. It's like the multiple Spiderman meme pointing fingers, but outside the comic panel the artist slinging the ink is "our greatest ally".
You know what a rhetorical question is so you should know that I do not actually care about the answer. You've said several times in this thread that you don't care about something or another, so you understand the concept.
No point in trying to argue w/ me about it because there isn't actually anything to prove or convince me of.
The story sounds like bull corn to me and that doesn't change the color on your TV. In other words, what I eat doesn't make you shit.
I thought that Israel might have done it without anyone telling me anything. It was because Charlie was so pro-Israel but then had Nick Fuentes and Dave Smith on to debate and it seemed like he was changing his mind.
You’re not crazy. The gaslighting might seem to be coming from several different directions but your gut has it right. They’re clever but not that clever.
Yep. It was just 18 days before the assassination when he was on with Ben Shapiro, as one of the very first times he was openly beginning to question if we should be trusting Israel, and directly questioning if Oct 7 was carried out by Israel
Ben's reaction pretty much sums it up, seemed like he couldn't believe Charlie was beginning to ask those questions... gave him a couple of "Woah, might wanna shut the fuck up" kinda looks
Because of the 3D chess scene in the Charlie X episode, I wondered if Spock (spook) was the mentor, but the AI said "NO, Kirk was the mentor". Spock was suspicious.
Kirk wears a GOLD shirt. Who would that be?
For reference... Q-2049,2050 says HRC=ALICE. (also spelled with letters AIC)
ok this is getting beyond fucking stupid now, i think i need a break from this and some cunts need to remember what we are fighting for, the very existence of our planet not just the USA, Q told us that PAYTRIOTS are everywhere stop being fucking surprised when they are released, Owens and Tucker just the latest ones.
It means everything is fake. It's just coded symbolic messaging. It's like we're watching a MOVIE, but if you've been around long enough you realize you've seen this episode before. The name Charlie Kirk is taken from Star Trek episode 2 back in the 60s when [they] were busy constructing the mess that Trump is carefully deconstructing now. That show explained in symbols what was happening at the time. "Charlie" was the nickname for the Viet Cong in Vietnam, but the three letters C,A,I tell who was really running things. Same symbols still work today. The original Star Trek shirts were color coded. RED, BLUE, (you know who) and GOLD in command.
To those angry that this was posted- We are supposed to look at a lot of information not just create echo chambers are we not? Why not discuss the information presented instead of hating the messenger the poster. We don’t want to get less information and bigger echos do we? Echo chambers do not attract the problem solvers and soon the thinkers will just go silent leaving only the loudest voice. Do you want to create Rheeeeee people because that is how you make Rheeeeee people. IMHO Frens need to be allowed a place to examine from all sides. At worst you gain some counter arguments you might not have had at Worst we miss key operations because we only want to look at what is comfortable. JS. Thanks Purrkiss80 for bringing the uncomfortable to some post. It’s interesting information even if I am fully unconvinced but something to add to the situation and think about. I do however think Antfia is 100 encouraging and benefiting from the infighting even while I doubt their cleverness as the source of the debate.
Thank you...Its Information just like everything else we post here, To be discussed Not attacked Because it doent fit someones narrative...
As much as we Think we Know, we 'Know' nothing really....All assumptions with some facts strung together to make some sense...😉🤷🏻♂️
Exactly and the art of debate is vital if we have any chance at all of making it through all this once the dust settles. We need good robust discussion especially about things that make us uncomfortable.
Interesting. Throwing mud in muddy water does seem bizarre.
Something I wonder is.
Say…. You (hypothetical you) know a person did something bad but you cannot prove it. So yo also know people can sue you if you defame them and such…
Could… (you) make up a story to encourage the other one to sue you for things like defamation and such knowing if they sue (you) that you would get an opening to the bad thing you could not prove or maybe you have a NDA that prevents you from proving it?
This could be a way to get information lawfully inserted into the public domain.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Why do people think that "internet points" matter???
I couldn't care less if I had 5 MILLION or - 5 MILLION....
They're just a indication of what people feel or think..... NOTHING more.... NOTHING less.. 😁😏
BULL SH*T. How stupid do you think we all are?
Charlie Kirk told several of his friends and advisors that he was leaving the pro-I=sr-ael cause and that his J-e-wish donors were pulling their money and sending him threatening emails and text messages and that he felt that they (I=s-ra-el) was going to kill him. He was invited/coerced to go to the Hamptons for the weekend shortly before his murder so that his donors and J-e-w-ish advisors could pressure Charlie to change his mind and promote Z-i-onism. He felt threatened and under duress. While there, B-i-b-i N. called him and invited him to fly for free to the 'I' country to be 're-educated' about his choice to no longer promote the 'I' country, and if he went and agreed to go back to promoting them, B-i-b-i would 'take him to the next level' and gift TPUSA $150 million dollars. Charlie turned it all down.
His staff and security behaved completely abnormally and complicit the day of his murder and every day after his murder. They were caught in many contradictory statements and downright lies.
Charlie's wife has seemed giddy and happy and unlike any 'grieving widow' any of us has ever seen.
Geofencing showed 13 cell phones present during the murder that were I=s-ra-el-based cell phones.
The man who stood up and cheered when he was shot is J-e-w-ish. The old guy 'Zinn' who stood up and said, "I shot him, I did it. Shoot me!' was J-e-w-ish and told others he was going to get paid for causing a distraction so the actual 'shooter' could get away.
The hospital Charlie was taken to, the surgeon who examined him, and the name of the building that the alleged shooter was perched upon were all Google searched a month beforehand from a location in Tel Aviv.
Everything points to the 'I' country. And shame on you for trying to gaslight us to think otherwise.
Excuse me, who the fuck do you think you're talking to.... Firstly it's a repost. Not mine....DOES IT LOOK LIKE MY POST???? Secondly, it's your fucking OPINION....Show me facts that ISRAEL MURDERED CHARLIE!!!!!! just like Arse holes, we all have one.... 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
PURKISS80.............ONE GREAT BIG THANK YOU FOR THAT SCREED!!!!!!!!!!!!
There is SO MUCH CHAFF on the Kirk situation that IT is impossible to discern who the hell killed him!!!!!!!
AND if it ain't smellin' right there is something wrong and there is something wrong!!!!
👌👌👌 People need to LOOK before they decide to rant and rave.... AND UNTIL I see definitive evidence on who Killed Charlie, EVERYTHING else is JUST OPINIONS........ 🥱🤔🙄
Maybe you should invest the time to listen to Candace. She has most of the receipts, though she is not alone. Only a low information person would discount the vast amount of information she has gathered together as she does the job the FBI won't do.
Is he saying "Bullsh*t" to you or to Ashton?
To me, first impression, it seems he is screaming at Ashton. However, in his last sentence he says "you" are trying to gaslight us. He could still be referring to Ashton. I wouldn't take his remarks personally.
The Psywar is getting thick.
It is a frazzled mess at the center. People are trying to read between the lines. Following Trump's lead is the best alternative but trust your gut feelings.
President Trump could be levying his own psywar against both sides simultaneously, which makes it even more confusing. I have a feeling Trump doesn't want the entire country becoming anti-Zionist at this stage of the game, saving Israel for last could still be part of the plan. If you give your enemy enough latitude, they will dig their own grave eventually.
Easy, maybe “you” meant Ashton Forbes, not purkiss
nobody murdered kirk
fake as sandy hook
I know. Erika Kirk smiled at the wrong time. The baby cried at the wrong time. People gave too much money to TPUSA. Plenty of evidence. Ask this: Why WOULD Israel care that much about one man's opinion?
Because that man is swaying the minds of millions - its a powerful voice, a calm, rational one, that was beginning to rationalize that we SHOULDNT be supporting Israel
18 days before his assassination he finally started questioning whether or not they can actually be trusted.
Everything that CasuallyObservant pointed out (except for the oddities in human behavior) are completely verifiable facts
“Six hours? I don’t believe it.” - Charlie Kirk
I have no idea why Israel would care that much about one man’s opinion. The question I have is why you care so much, to the point of swearing and name calling and having a complete meltdown tantrum when someone disagrees with you. Do you always act this way on here or is it only in regards to this topic?
Charlie had a lot of future White House momentum. It behooved anyone who wanted to cut him down, to do so before he grew more powerful. As a campus touring debate persona, he was easier to “get at” than he would be if his popularity grew. Just a thought.
One common enough theory is he was being groomed for office and simply broke away from his donors & handlers desires.
I've no dog in this fight. But, that notion is quickly becoming a normie-sphere talking point.
Are we talking about the same things? Your cursing WAS directed at u/casuallyobservant for his response above to the main post, was it not?
I think there were some strange things just prior to the removal of Charlie from this planet.
Isn't that always the way? Obviously, somebody decided to kill him, but seriously, who wouldn't act weird in that situation??? And the attacks on his wife are astonishingly evil, Candace Owens is either round the fucking bend or the scum of the earth, there is no other explanation for her behaviour, she should do this she should do that??? Says who? She wasn't pregnant, she had a fake pregnancy stomach????????? And Charlie never caught on that his fucking wife wasn't pregnant twice???? I am over this nonsense, the infiltrators into the Q and MAGA movement are identifying themselves in numbers now.
Why, for the love of God, are you using these moronic abbreviations? you are not posting on the NY Times you bellend. Also, the attacks on his wife are beyond fucking stupid, who decides how people grieve ? you? Owens has lost the fucking plot as far as I can see. Remember this is a Q board, we were repeatedly warned that we have PAYTRIOTS everywhere. If you are correct, then Charlie was a fucking moron who could not see that his wife was an asset and also not pregnant, according to some of the utter fucking drivel i have seen lately. Please fuck off back to the CIA and do fucking better
👌👌🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
nobody believes erika kirk is sincerely greiving, because shes not. theres plenty of info out there if you choose to see it
the shooting was as fake as sandy hook
im leaning toward “charlie” never actually lived, and was a fictitious character, an actor playing a role
“you are watching a movie”
If you want to mouth off at someone, then go to his fucking Twitter page and do it there.... 🤬🤬🤬🤬
HEY purkiss80...YOU sure are PUTTING A LOT OF KNICKERS IN A TWIST FOR A WENDESDAY!!!!!! CONGRATS....😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
These threads always get hilariously ratio'd. Either no engagement or engagement opposite the narrative being pushed, which usually involves a lot of girly emotions from the narrative pushers.
"engagement opposite the narrative being pushed" Thats the DV TRIBE brigade doing forum slides.
To be fair, anytime Israel is mentioned as having performed some kind of act of unseemly behavior, the Israel-is-responsible-for-every-ill-on-the-planet folks upvote it, doesn't matter the subject or whether there is any proof. They have to be guilty just by being Israel. I am not saying they haven't done awful things but it's not hard to get a bunch of upvotes on comments like that. JS.
That’s a perfectly fair point. I don’t think it justifies that tantrum, but yeah I can see how that would be frustrating for some.
These facts are correct from what I've read.
Charlie’s wife happy and giddy (I don’t see that exactly) doesn’t mean anything. Everyone grieves differently. She can’t cry forever. That would be weird too and annoying. As a Christian she knows Charlie is in a better place, the Kingdom of Heaven. That should bring joy to any Christian.
http://bitchute.com/video/X7z8qXGp2ZN4/
girls are coached to recite script after Charlie assassination
I don't follow Owens or Tucker since they are actively dividing MAGA and it all is meaningless distraction in my view. What if Israel did it? What you gonna do about it? Stand against MAGA and Trump because you hate the Jews? Trump is leading a war against the Cabal which includes every government in Europe, Asia and includes Israel and our own government. Do not give these Paytriots a voice and be distracted from the main mission which is their real agenda. IMHO
I tend to think Trump is using Israel rather than the other way around.
👌👌👌🙏🏻🙏🏻
What do you mean “dividing maga”?
Tucker and Owens are dividing MAGA---speaking against Trump. That is what I mean!
I don’t like being lied to. My senses tingle when I smell one, and this whole Charlie Kirk thing stank from the beginning like a whale carcass rotting on a beach. Too many things didn’t add up, and too many things looked suspicious. The fake text thread was too laughable to be real, and to me it was proof not only that the FBI was actively covering things up, but that they wanted us to know they were doing it. That wasn’t a mistake written by a clueless old man at a desk in the bowels of the agency. That was a communication to let us know what was really going on.
Then there was the suddenly put-together grand memorial like the mother of all rallies, the glamorous “Tammy Faye Bakker” beauty queen widow in sequins, the strangely missing kids, the paving over of the crime scene, the whisking away of TPUSA cameras, the scrambling of Patel and Bongino, the public denial of culpability from Netanyahu himself—twice! Charlie looking distracted and nervous that fateful day. It was like, well, a movie. When Candice started to put things together, she caught me by my dangling curiosity, and I payed attention for a while until she began to seem batshit crazy. (I do believe the “Bridgette Macron is a man” stuff because the threats of French legal retribution were quickly withdrawn when Candice put up her dukes.) Now Blumenthal is to blame for making everything up? A conspiracy? Who’d have thunk it?
I don’t believe everything Blumenthal said was made up. Remember, if you want to poison people you have to put it in real food or drink. You can’t just give them a big glass of Draino and expect to have a successful poisoning. Blumenthal caught me, too, for a minute, but when I saw him suddenly showing up EVERYWHERE with that smug smile and an almost supernatural confidence about what he was saying, I quickly withdrew the tentative trust I gave him for the sake of satisfying my curiosity. I learned what sudden everywhere-being was about when obscure Illinois politician Obama suddenly popped up out of nowhere and the media went all out to make him a star.
I think Charlie WAS turning away from Israeli support (let’s say Israeli-adjacent for plausible deniability) because it’s obvious this was happening there at the end from clips and interviews. They (meaning associated persons here and in Israel working on the same thing for different reasons) WERE trying to get control of the TPSUA organization to make it something Charlie never meant it to be, and he resented being bullied, so he stuck them in the eye putting Tucker onstage in Tampa. Predictably, a few weeks later he was dead in a public execution.
I have nothing against Jews or even Israel, but don’t tell me that casting a critical eye on what they do is anti-semitism. That tactic doesn’t work anymore. Israel has a deep state, too, and the Israeli government works really hard to influence American public opinion and politicians in the government. Scrutiny is warranted.
All that being said, I wouldn't be surprised if Charlie was a whole lot less than dead and safely hidden away in a white hat government-sponsored protection program.
What got me going down the Charlie Kirk assassination rabbit hole were the things caught on camera at the exact moment of bullet impact. The thought that a 30-06 bullet didn’t leave an exit wound also seemed suspect.
Here is a video of a man manipulating and pointing something that looks like some sort of palm gun. https://x.com/acid_mcdevitt/status/1968666485464711324?s=61&t=Na9w5fE3ieoT5_-6p6gtUw
Here is security pointing something under his arm at Charlie and another giving some sort of signal.
https://x.com/realtx_patriot/status/1966548372979896720?s=61&t=Na9w5fE3ieoT5_-6p6gtUw
If you look closely, there is a guy in the audience wearing a white shirt frantically shaking something like he is trying to get it to work while pointing it at Charlie at the exact time of impact.
https://x.com/jimmyfalk_55/status/2036563762472427661?s=61&t=Na9w5fE3ieoT5_-6p6gtUw
One of these things by themselves could just be coincidence but all three were done by older adults in a sea of young adults. Not a coincidence in my mind.
I still think this assassination was similar to the Butler attempt on Trump. Whoever was responsible for security, set things up to create a hole or a security blind spot for someone(patsy) to carry out the shooting.
This thinking may have opened me up to psyops as things went on but I regret none of it.
George Zinn claimed to nurses at the hospital that he would be getting paid.
Seed the crowd with a bunch of potential patsies and then let it all play out. One of the guys will take the fall while the truth of what happened gets obfuscated.
True, I didn’t even mention Zinn or that kid that was jumping around like his ass was on fire. There were plenty of things that could raise an eyebrow well before Candace or Bloomenthall got involved.
I'm concerned at why this post is stickied. For a board that typically entertains the possibility of a conspiracy with any given event, it has been closed to the idea that Kirk's assassination was anything but the fedslop narrative.
We are smarter than this.
Posts aren’t necessarily our viewpoint and are often just reports of what’s being said out there. Whoever stickied this one might not think it’s valid but might think we should keep our fingers on the pulse. The claim is weird- trying to acquit Israel by throwing jew Blumenthal under the bus.
Hey now. The board is probably 95% “the official story is bullshit.”
I don’t know why it’s stickied either though. Cause there’s nothing high effort about it. The poster just posted the link.
So then post something that contradicts it, or stop f*cking whining.....
Not worth all this emotion. Its playing right into Satans hands. At the end of the day this is noise not signal and its made worse by numbskulls (paid influncers whose job is to confuse and conflate and insert bullshit to the conversation) and then multiplied again by other numbskulls who care but actually couldnt even verbalize why they care. It was someones op from the moment the trigger was pulled, all of it designed to elicit exactly the response you see in this thread.
Whether Candace or Tucker are right or wrong doesnt matter to the plan in any way shape or form. I have completely ignored it since the week after it happened and my understanding of the problem and Trumps solutions has not suffered in the least. Israel is being saved for last for a very specific reason. This event doesnt change that.
YOU EITHER TRUST TRUMP AND THE Q WHITEHAT TEAM OR YOU DONT. Your choice.
1000% spot on 👌🙏🏻 There is no in-between.....
Link to the Actual Thread
BTW just a note - AlexisWIlkins has never talked about Blumenthal. I am not sure where the receipts for Blumenthal is, but not in this thread.
Search Alexis Tweets
A division tactic. They know there is a debate within the right about how much we should be aligned with Israel. We need to understand that what Q meant by "Israel" was the Globalist Cabal that was nesting inside Israel, not the nation of Israel itself. Aligning with Israel to achieve common goals in the world, such as ridding the world of the Islamic Republic, does not mean we have succumbed to thos Cabal in side Israel, which i believe to have been seriously weakened in thr last 2 years.
Winner winner chicken dinner. At it's simplest core, that is exactly what this article is attempting to do. It's like the multiple Spiderman meme pointing fingers, but outside the comic panel the artist slinging the ink is "our greatest ally".
Stickied? WTH is going on on this site?
Anyone who is actually following this investigation can see its receipts and validity, and anyone swallowing the FEDSLOP should be embarassed.
You obviously don't know why posts are stickied on this site..... 🙄🤔
Thanks for posting and a thanks to the mods for stickying.
😉😁👌🙏🏻
Yeah, I saved this thread.
Everyone showed up with their opinions and receipts. It is a good point in this timeline to reference for the big trial.
Mind Unveiled exposes Candace Owens BIGLY in his new banger.
Yeah this is bullcorn, it sounds like a narrative used to throw people off the scent of israel..... yet again.
Why do the mods allow this kind of stuff to fly here?
It's called free speech you moron.... What you do with it is up to you.... NOT THAT DIFFICULT TO COMPREHEND.....
They didn't just allow it, they stickied it, so ask them.... There's a link on the sidebar....
You know what a rhetorical question is so you should know that I do not actually care about the answer. You've said several times in this thread that you don't care about something or another, so you understand the concept.
No point in trying to argue w/ me about it because there isn't actually anything to prove or convince me of.
The story sounds like bull corn to me and that doesn't change the color on your TV. In other words, what I eat doesn't make you shit.
I thought that Israel might have done it without anyone telling me anything. It was because Charlie was so pro-Israel but then had Nick Fuentes and Dave Smith on to debate and it seemed like he was changing his mind.
You’re not crazy. The gaslighting might seem to be coming from several different directions but your gut has it right. They’re clever but not that clever.
Yep. It was just 18 days before the assassination when he was on with Ben Shapiro, as one of the very first times he was openly beginning to question if we should be trusting Israel, and directly questioning if Oct 7 was carried out by Israel
Ben's reaction pretty much sums it up, seemed like he couldn't believe Charlie was beginning to ask those questions... gave him a couple of "Woah, might wanna shut the fuck up" kinda looks
I mean, he's not dead, so
what?
Maybe not, But his "mentor" is surely gone.
Charlie X (Star Trek episode 2) was played by Robert Walker Jr. Meanwhile Walker Texas Ranger (Chuck Norris) just died.
Charlie Kirk early mentor Jeff Webb also just died from "a fall" playing "pickle"ball. Pickleball is played in COURT. You can't spell Charlie (or Air Canada) without letters C,A,I. Is Jeff WEB shorthand for Jeffrey Epstein's WEB? Seems likely.
Because of the 3D chess scene in the Charlie X episode, I wondered if Spock (spook) was the mentor, but the AI said "NO, Kirk was the mentor". Spock was suspicious.
Kirk wears a GOLD shirt. Who would that be?
For reference... Q-2049,2050 says HRC=ALICE. (also spelled with letters AIC)
ok this is getting beyond fucking stupid now, i think i need a break from this and some cunts need to remember what we are fighting for, the very existence of our planet not just the USA, Q told us that PAYTRIOTS are everywhere stop being fucking surprised when they are released, Owens and Tucker just the latest ones.
I’m sorry what?
It means everything is fake. It's just coded symbolic messaging. It's like we're watching a MOVIE, but if you've been around long enough you realize you've seen this episode before. The name Charlie Kirk is taken from Star Trek episode 2 back in the 60s when [they] were busy constructing the mess that Trump is carefully deconstructing now. That show explained in symbols what was happening at the time. "Charlie" was the nickname for the Viet Cong in Vietnam, but the three letters C,A,I tell who was really running things. Same symbols still work today. The original Star Trek shirts were color coded. RED, BLUE, (you know who) and GOLD in command.
What's your thoughts about Dennis Prager then?
I haven't thought about Dennis Prager. Why do you ask?
He's behind Charlie's rise. They say it was mutual but separate work but I beg to differ
Blumenthal's don't get the benefit of the doubt in my world.
https://nitter.net/i/status/2036580731716055091
u/#ummwhat
Kirk isn't dead. Why does this bullshit get priority on this site?
To those angry that this was posted- We are supposed to look at a lot of information not just create echo chambers are we not? Why not discuss the information presented instead of hating the messenger the poster. We don’t want to get less information and bigger echos do we? Echo chambers do not attract the problem solvers and soon the thinkers will just go silent leaving only the loudest voice. Do you want to create Rheeeeee people because that is how you make Rheeeeee people. IMHO Frens need to be allowed a place to examine from all sides. At worst you gain some counter arguments you might not have had at Worst we miss key operations because we only want to look at what is comfortable. JS. Thanks Purrkiss80 for bringing the uncomfortable to some post. It’s interesting information even if I am fully unconvinced but something to add to the situation and think about. I do however think Antfia is 100 encouraging and benefiting from the infighting even while I doubt their cleverness as the source of the debate.
Thank you...Its Information just like everything else we post here, To be discussed Not attacked Because it doent fit someones narrative... As much as we Think we Know, we 'Know' nothing really....All assumptions with some facts strung together to make some sense...😉🤷🏻♂️
Exactly and the art of debate is vital if we have any chance at all of making it through all this once the dust settles. We need good robust discussion especially about things that make us uncomfortable.
Did max have anything to do with a 30-06 could not go through a human neck?
That's my first mystery I'd like to know.
I just want to say that I am enjoying life and if anything happens to me it was Isreal
😂 We have now reached I am not suicidal evolution save point 1 in the game
Interesting. Throwing mud in muddy water does seem bizarre.
Something I wonder is.
Say…. You (hypothetical you) know a person did something bad but you cannot prove it. So yo also know people can sue you if you defame them and such…
Could… (you) make up a story to encourage the other one to sue you for things like defamation and such knowing if they sue (you) that you would get an opening to the bad thing you could not prove or maybe you have a NDA that prevents you from proving it?
This could be a way to get information lawfully inserted into the public domain.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Why do people think that "internet points" matter??? I couldn't care less if I had 5 MILLION or - 5 MILLION.... They're just a indication of what people feel or think..... NOTHING more.... NOTHING less.. 😁😏