17
Gaterop 17 points ago +18 / -1

The Twitter post this is a screenshot of doesnt have a source, just a screenshot of the text. This is a screenshot of a screenshot with no other sources listed. I went through comments on the Twitter post and saw people asking for source, I didn't look through everything but I never saw anyone post a source. If someone else can find something that'd be great, from what I can tell this was completely made up.

1
Gaterop 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don't know what people expect to happen trying to brute force their way into only feeling positive feelings while our body tries it's best to keep an equilibrium. If you start trying to get rid of all illness eventually you will guarantee that you become sick because the symptoms that are present when we call somebody "sick" is actually our immune system self correcting and expelling whatever it doesn't need to maintain equilibrium. Vaccines are the absolute dumbest way to go about medicine, they 100% guarantee that your immune system will fight back to maintain its equilibrium and that's not gonna be pretty for some people who eat vaccines for breakfast.

1
Gaterop 1 point ago +2 / -1

An "in group" literally requires an "out group" to exist as an "in group", it seems pretty basic that opposites imply one another. It's only when people don't realize this that they want to eliminate completely the group they consider to be the enemy. On what grounds will you call yourself righteous when you've killed everybody not righteous? Well, you take a page from our government and invent a new "out group" for your "in group" to kill. Having some type of opposition is very much an essential part of politics, else you find yourself in the position we are: tyranny.

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +3 / -1

Dirt road discussions is a podcast, if he meant something else I'm not sure

5
Gaterop 5 points ago +6 / -1

Try saying "Joe ain't doing shit" to his diaper, it might have a different opinion. 🀣🀣🀣

4
Gaterop 4 points ago +5 / -1

https://archive.ph/4CyN8 you can use archive to get past pay wall

"Before the invasion, when they had surrounded Ukraine, it might have been possible [to avoid war]. If [Ukrainian president Volodymyr] Zelensky could have been made to promise that his country will not join nato, or made to grant a high degree of autonomy to the two enclaves in the east. I understand this would be hard to doβ€”perhaps an American leader could have done it. But of course [Zelensky] would refuse."

1
Gaterop 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's cuz he doesn't have anything, anyone that posts stuff like this that doesn't also share the source and just says "hur dur research yourself" doesn't have shit and they know it.

1
Gaterop 1 point ago +2 / -1

We need to hold all politicians to a much much higher standard than we do currently. Enough of this lesser of two evils crap, we need good people not limp dicked two faced idiots where we go "atleast it's not a Democrat" or the left goes "atleast it's not a Republican". Joe Biden is the perfect example of this, sure he blatantly cheated and there's straight up video evidence of it, but at the end of the day people still voted for him, but like they always parrot it was a vote against Trump, not for Joe Biden. What a dumb mentality!

4
Gaterop 4 points ago +5 / -1

Not even going into the issues with the way we teach kids and how bad schools are, but the way we go about teaching history is not as a type of warning but more in the spirit of "we are so much better now, our society is infallible now" so it's not a surprise people are so blind to it, they weren't taught it as something to look out for and stop.

0
Gaterop 0 points ago +1 / -1

Very common thing here, the group think on this forum has been getting a tad out of hand IMO. I don't think it's very hard to see that a lot of people are changing what they post, or just straight up not posting things to avoid the massive downvotes and butthurt comments. I can't count how often I see "I'm not a doomer but...." or "I don't mean to doom, but..." or "I believe X but...", or anything along those lines where they post essentially a disclaimer before a 'soft' version of their actual opinions. A lot of people here don't allow any wiggle room whatsoever in their narrowly prescribed world view and it's definitely something I would categorize as a major problem on here.

0
Gaterop 0 points ago +1 / -1

I agree, but would you agree that disinformation should be ignored? I'm honestly shocked that merely bringing up the fact this guy makes shit up gets down voted.

4
Gaterop 4 points ago +5 / -1

Whether it's the Supreme Court making decisions for everybody or a small disconnected Congress, or even the President, I think everybody needs to see that Centraliezed government needs to go. All these issues you list, and all the issues everybody including those on the left, all stem from Centralized control gone crazy. Ultimately when you put issues aside everybody will agree that they want the decisions to he made as close to them as possible if not themselves making it.

-2
Gaterop -2 points ago +2 / -4

He's already majorly shot himself in the foot credibility wise, if he says something of value in the future it is automatically suspect, but hey maybe he'll release info of some value in the future and at that time maybe I revise my opinion of the guy. Until then he seems like your typical "2 weeks bro" type of guy.

-2
Gaterop -2 points ago +4 / -6

I seem to recall this guy saying in 48 hours there would be big happenings related to election fraud, infact you even posted it over a week ago. Obviously nothing happened, my trust of this guy is absolute 0, his words while they might be interesting are of little to no value coming from his mouth given his track record. Now if someone like oh say... Clarence Thomas, made this same comment, now there's some actual weight rather than this guy who killed his own credibility.

Edit: wow I didn't know datefag failures were so respected here

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +3 / -1

My sides! It doesn't get much more inconsistent than this!

0
Gaterop 0 points ago +1 / -1

Funny thing is I think you'll start to see people renounce their citizenship here but for completely different reasons. People here illegally are treated better than citizens, currently being a citizen of this country is kind of like shooting your own foot, the government treats you far far better if you aren't a citizen. I've actually seriously considered it, though I probably have too white of skin to get away with it.

5
Gaterop 5 points ago +7 / -2

I mean in a way Joe is actually correct here, maybe the first time in his life. The past 2 years have shown that the ordinary American truly does not give a shit about the constitution, I doubt the ordinary American has even read half of it let alone the full text. The ordinary American is lining up and fighting with others to hand over their freedoms as quickly as possible, they demand the government enslave them even more than they are already.

0
Gaterop 0 points ago +1 / -1

Honestly I doubt they will even have to go out of state. Doctors that perform abortions will just do it under the table or call it something other than abortion. Absolute worst case they would have to get one of the multiple organizations that have announced they will cover costs and transportation to do it for them. Truly complaining about nothing, and delusionally demanding the government get further involved despite that being the opposite of what they say they want.

6
Gaterop 6 points ago +6 / -0

Am I missing some information here? Is this person saying that aborted fetuses were for sure getting birth certificates and I have simply missed the story, or is this person simply saying that it could have happened? Why even need an abortion to happen to make a fake birth certificate, it doesn't make any sense to me. So am I missing something that everybody else is getting, or is this just a "what if this happened" scenario that doesn't even make sense to happen as a hypothetical. Why not just print fake birth certificates, what does a dead fetus add to the process of faking a birth certificate?

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +3 / -1

The abortion crowd is so delusional, they say my body my choice and yet run screaming and crying to demand that government give them permission to do something. They want it to be their choice, but only if someone else makes that decision for them... yikes! This is just surface level stuff without going into the issue whatsoever and they already cannot hold a consistent position. Is it their choice or is it someone else's? Well if you take these people protesting as the general position of people 'for abortion', they don't want it to be their choice, they much prefer somebody other than themselves telling them they can and cannot do something. Truly clown world at its peak 🀑

1
Gaterop 1 point ago +2 / -1

Implying the dipshits actually work during the week 🀣🀣🀣

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›