2
Saxmaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is one spelling mistake. He spells Avenatti "Avanatti." So the letter would be "A"

2
Saxmaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the double standard exploits a shortcut in our psychology that tells us that whoever is breaking laws and getting away with it must be at the top of the hierarchy. Casual law breaking serves as proof that the person has real power over the police, judges, and other officials who have power over you. If you know the only reward you'll get for fighting for justice is a boot in your face, then you'll just have to shut up about it like everybody else.

1
Saxmaster 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'd sell my blood. New blood is better at carrying oxygen, so it's healthy to get rid of old blood.

5
Saxmaster 5 points ago +5 / -0

How did they miss CHANGES IN THE OUTPUT OF THE SUN?? The changes are regular with predictable solar cycles.

I've wondered for a while if every tree on the planet could take up the extra CO2 by growing a few extra leaves. Turns out, according to satellite data, the earth is greening. We need a break from scientists so we can see other people.

3
Saxmaster 3 points ago +3 / -0

A major problem with Reddit and this site has always been that when a sub-group develops and creates a new subreddit, the larger group gets cut off from the flow of information that inspired the creation of the sub-group. "That sounds like pizza-gate, go over there." So then the larger group becomes blind to that category of information.

11
Saxmaster 11 points ago +11 / -0

I keep coming back to the idea I saw here a few days ago: any plan to prove election fraud would be missing a giant opportunity if it only exposed one election cycle as rigged. Senators come up for reelection every six years, and their elections are staggered, so if you wanted to remove every fraudulently elected senator you would need proof from three different elections. If this "plan" existed, it could have started with the 2018 midterms and be finishing up in just two more weeks.

4
Saxmaster 4 points ago +4 / -0

First time I saw this top notch meme. Some things are worth repeating.

4
Saxmaster 4 points ago +4 / -0

The amazing thing is, you could be totally right, but the telling of lie upon lie eventually solidifies and becomes like a bedrock that we all have to base our thinking on. Chances are most of our thinking is based on false premises.

Here's a question; if the whole virus thing is fake, why did they keep coming out with "variants" that were so hilariously un-scary. It felt like "omicron" ruined their plans. It only confirmed the predictions of dissenting scientists who were predicting more transmissible but less deadly variants.

3
Saxmaster 3 points ago +3 / -0

They've "accepted the vaccine into their life." It's a form of self hypnosis. Frankly, we do it all the time, just to slightly varying degrees.

2
Saxmaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it could be explained by the camera angles, though I can't really see the phone well. Is Biden even in the phone's screen? I just see podium.

1
Saxmaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm just relieved they're planning on the population increasing. When phone numbers go down to five digits, be very worried.

by PepeSee
4
Saxmaster 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think it may more likely be Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google.

2
Saxmaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

If I were the deep state I would make sure the truth looked as dumb as possible. That's why I come here, for the dumb truth.

3
Saxmaster 3 points ago +3 / -0

I took my mom in Burbank, CA. It was a full house. Lots of audience participation, people applauded and cheered, a "Let's go Brandon" broke out. Many stayed after to discuss.

Whoever was saying this was a bore are wrong. This carefully lays out a case that proves huge election fraud and no one should be complaining about it not being flashy enough or whatever. It's a whole lot more interesting that most types of civic engagement. Tell your friends to watch this movie.

0
Saxmaster 0 points ago +1 / -1

They use sound arguments, even if ultimately they are wrong. Raw death numbers are meaningless without the context like what percentage of the population was vaccinated. If 99.999% of people were vaccinated, then the numbers in that chart show the vaccine works. If it was 50% then the numbers look bad for the vaccine.

1
Saxmaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then when you try to report fixing the fence they'll ask for a receipt and some taxes or you'll lose more social credit points.

by 369Q
1
Saxmaster 1 point ago +4 / -3

A simple "no, thanks" would have saved even more precious time

1
Saxmaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I clearly see airplanes moving through tree leaves. It's not an opaque tree trunk, but the side of a weeping willow

4
Saxmaster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Excellent show, highly recommended.

2
Saxmaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I value reddit-like forums like this specifically because of how frequently misinformation gets debunked. The way we treat comments equally instead of prioritizing accounts with more "followers" makes it possible for a random person with specific knowledge to have their voice heard when it counts. This site's credibility doesn't come from being right about everything, but by having a system that's better at finding the truth than others.

view more: Next ›