I think the second half of that quote was sarcasm. This part "I’ve had it and I still can’t smell my own bull shit’"
As far as it's not the flu, it is different....I have heard people say that in person. You might get out of Smurfville a little more often and talk to people.
Being overly skeptical is as bad as being naive. I find a middle ground and keep an open mind about it. Sometime proof shows up later. That is why the "future proves past" quote from Q.
COVID is and has always been the flu.
It was just renamed.
That is why the Germans offered $3million for the isolated COVID virus.
It does not exist. So how did people ever test or develop a vaccine?
Ask the MSM - COVID is floating around the air all around us, yet no one is able to identify it.
Someone needs to get some of these PCR tests for future reference. FDA is recalling them because they are inaccurate but still being used - REALLY! They want to destroy all the evidence.
I might as well be blind, but can you please point me in that web page where it is mentioned the tests do not differentiate between the flu and COVID-19? Thank you!
3rd paragraph in the link above
“ In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.”
They don't know what multiplex means. What the current tests do is tell you do you have the flu yes/no. Or do you have covid yes/no. What the link is saying is that they want to develop a test that will specifically tell you if you don't have covid then do you have the flu or neither.
I'm not saying that they can actually do that, I'm just trying to help people understand that that's what they're saying so that everyone stops jumping to the wrong conclusion.
After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only…
Visit the FDA website for a list of authorized COVID-19 diagnostic methods…
In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses…
"CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season."
This is the statement that is in question from the CDC's write-up. People are deducing that the PCR test that was used since the start of the pandemic must not meet this criteria of differentiating between the flu and Covid if labs are being encouraged to look for other approved alternatives. There has been a lot of criticism that the PCR testing was being incorrectly utilized to get the results that were wanted versus what was actually there (i.e. the number of cycles being used). This also brings into question why flu levels were nearly at zero. Was it the masks and social distancing, or was everything being chalked up as Covid since the PCR test wasn't accurate?
Personally I'd like the CDC to provide more insight on this decision because, as other posts are bringing to light, it's strange timing now that Soros and Gates are looking to profit from their recent investments in Covid testing methods.
Reminder: 40% of all covid deaths were also positive for pneumonia or influenza (they lumped the two into the same category so we couldn't know the true values)
They have plausible deniability (it was probably all pneumonia! You're crazy!)
But the truth is they crammed Fluv comormidities into a plausible category to hide the numbers. Fluv deaths were counted as covid deaths (on purpose from on high) to push the scare narrative.
3.3 Million of which also had (either) Influenza or Pneumonia
That's 46%
But are those Influenza comorbidities? Or Pnuemonia? Could be either. Which is why they lumped it together. So when you point to this and say "see! They counted Influenzadeaths as covid deaths!" they have plausible deniability and can say, no no, those are probably just pneumonia cases.
That’s what all this delta variant nonsense is about, the audit results are coming out and they need to have everyone shut up in their house communicating over lefty controlled media to prevent the truth from getting out.
I heard a lady call into the David Webb show back in May or June last year. She claimed to be a medical coder and she said they they had a new code, PIC. Pneumonia, Influenza and COVID is what that purportedly stood for. Talked about the money hospitals were receiving for each confirmed case. Since then, my suspicions of bullshit were confirmed.
☝️ This. Mandating on bogus info under the guise of emergency use authority with availability of other treatments. ! There should be NO VAX, FULL STOP !
In my opinion this is the biggest news maybe ever... all of this for a test they knew was testing for the flu and the common cold... locking the world down.. destroying families and businesses and elections.. then killing people without informed consent with an experimental rna treatment..
I knew all along they were counting flu cases as covid cases. The flu MIGHT reduce in occurances with everyone on defense against viruses, but it would not virtually disappear.
I posted this exact pic on Lifelog and got shut down for three days. As soon as I was able to post things again, I posted it AGAIN only I typed it word for word instead of posting the "picture". It is still up.....I am so sick of this shit.
I think this whole exchange just got out of hand, all they are arguing about is a number "6 million Jews" and whether it's real or not, rebel news hosts being jewish are obviously going to defend that number as that's what they've been taught, they could have just agreed to disagree and moved on but both of them got butt hurt and triggered and ended the interview.
rebel news didn't censor or interrupt him and let him make his argument, both sides look bad after that argument probably because humans are just emotional retards generally, I wouldn't make much of that exchange other than a miss understanding from both parties.
Bothe Ezra and David kept saying that they just wanted Chris to have an opportunity to clarify his position and clear up any confusion. So that's what Chris did, but David kept trying to "correct" him. That's not reporting.
Nah david was just trying to provide the counter arguments that people make so he could make his argument to dispute them, only when they got the "6 million" question did david get emotionally attached and persist that chris was wrong, not the best journalism but it's still journalism, it happens all the time, you just move on to the next question at that point and let the viewers make up their own minds, just because the interview devolved into a debate on 1 question doesn't mean you need to walk out and shit talk each other.
Clash of 2 personalities disagreeing on contentious subject:
suborn(david) vs sensitive(chris)
I disagree with you. Journalists, reporters, etc. are supposed to just report. When they try to correct they are entering into "opinion piece" territory. They can do that without a guest and just state their position. They were not allowing Chris to state and maintain his opinion.
No, they're not understanding this right and everyone needs to pay attention so we don't look stupid making claims that aren't true. A multiplex is a test that can identify more than one thing. If you take the current test for covid it can only tell you if you have covid or not. What the link is proposing is to have a test that can tell you whether you have covid, flu, or neither.
And somehow we are supposed to believe they know people have the Delta variant.
Hey man, don’t question the Science.
The Delta variant is Science.
Fauci said any attack on him is an attack on Science.
We can then surmise that Science is Fauci.
If Fauci is Science, and Delta variant is Science, then … hang on, need to do some common core…
….divide the denominator by luciferase, carryover the 1, minus that by 0.334, remove unnecessary numbers, multiply by desired equitable digit, …
Yeap, Delta Variant is Fauci.
You forgot dividing by 666
Yeah, but he used common core - the 666 is built in...
The 666 is multiplied with common core.
Or maybe COVID19 is the reincarnation of Prince Philip.
Faucianity 101
I believe this may be some of your finest work basil.
Science is weird. Fauci is weird.
Fauci is a virus. He only has one protein spike, thankfully it is very tiny and withered.
LOL. Great username
Oh my! LOL This made me giggle.
the 'alleged' Delta variant.
"Invisible Enemies" created by the mere mention of them.
U forgot lambda too
Been saying this for over a year and quite a few still don't get it.
Hi, are you most of us?
even here on GA there are some people who are like ‘it’s not the flu, it’s different, I’ve had it and I still can’t smell my own bull shit’
The part about them being connoisseurs of the nuance between flu strains, yes
Zinc deficiency
The problem is we can.
Really? I haven't seen that. Weird.
Need a booster chair?
Nah, just proof.
cool burn bro
I think the second half of that quote was sarcasm. This part "I’ve had it and I still can’t smell my own bull shit’"
As far as it's not the flu, it is different....I have heard people say that in person. You might get out of Smurfville a little more often and talk to people.
Being overly skeptical is as bad as being naive. I find a middle ground and keep an open mind about it. Sometime proof shows up later. That is why the "future proves past" quote from Q.
COVID is and has always been the flu. It was just renamed. That is why the Germans offered $3million for the isolated COVID virus. It does not exist. So how did people ever test or develop a vaccine?
Ask the MSM - COVID is floating around the air all around us, yet no one is able to identify it.
It’s not the flu. However the tests were used to make sure everything was reported as covid to inflate numbers and fear.
You can’t say it’s “just the flu” while claiming it was developed and intentionally released by China.
The flu argument is silly.
I thought you can request covid samples from the CDC.
People are dumb enough to believe when some guy says he did a thing but doesn't provide proof.
Someone needs to get some of these PCR tests for future reference. FDA is recalling them because they are inaccurate but still being used - REALLY! They want to destroy all the evidence.
Just had my instagram temporarily shut off for posting this image.
*edit - tried to upload it again. My account is now deleted.
i just got a 7 day ban for posting this meme too...
I cant find the cdc source. Anyone have a link? Going to use this.
https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html
I might as well be blind, but can you please point me in that web page where it is mentioned the tests do not differentiate between the flu and COVID-19? Thank you!
3rd paragraph in the link above “ In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.”
For additional info: https://www.genomeweb.com/molecular-diagnostics/cdc-withdraw-eua-covid-19-test-fda-revokes-three-other-euas-non-use-agency#.YP9Hry9q2f0
It doesn’t. People are just inferring it.
There’s enough Covid shenanigans without these kind of reaches. For example, the PCR cycle threshold contributes to a lot of the scamdemic.
They don't know what multiplex means. What the current tests do is tell you do you have the flu yes/no. Or do you have covid yes/no. What the link is saying is that they want to develop a test that will specifically tell you if you don't have covid then do you have the flu or neither.
I'm not saying that they can actually do that, I'm just trying to help people understand that that's what they're saying so that everyone stops jumping to the wrong conclusion.
Gotcha, I wasn't quite sure which direction your sarcasm was aimed
After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only…
Visit the FDA website for a list of authorized COVID-19 diagnostic methods…
In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses…
"CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season."
This is the statement that is in question from the CDC's write-up. People are deducing that the PCR test that was used since the start of the pandemic must not meet this criteria of differentiating between the flu and Covid if labs are being encouraged to look for other approved alternatives. There has been a lot of criticism that the PCR testing was being incorrectly utilized to get the results that were wanted versus what was actually there (i.e. the number of cycles being used). This also brings into question why flu levels were nearly at zero. Was it the masks and social distancing, or was everything being chalked up as Covid since the PCR test wasn't accurate?
Personally I'd like the CDC to provide more insight on this decision because, as other posts are bringing to light, it's strange timing now that Soros and Gates are looking to profit from their recent investments in Covid testing methods.
Reminder: 40% of all covid deaths were also positive for pneumonia or influenza (they lumped the two into the same category so we couldn't know the true values)
They have plausible deniability (it was probably all pneumonia! You're crazy!)
But the truth is they crammed Fluv comormidities into a plausible category to hide the numbers. Fluv deaths were counted as covid deaths (on purpose from on high) to push the scare narrative.
pneumonia is a symptom of many diseases btw. It isn't a disease itself.
It's pairing Influenza with pneumonia so you can't see how many people dying "of covid" just so happened to die "with" Influenza.
Where did you get this 40% statistic? Just want to be able to cite my source if I use that stat as a talking point
They used to have it all prepared for you. Now we have to make it ourselves (my link broke, but we can rebuild it, we have the power)
https://data.cdc.gov/d/hk9y-quqm/visualization
Select 'bar chart' at the top
"Condition" as the Dimension on the left
and "Covid-19 Deaths" as the Measure
7.2 Million covid 19 Deaths
3.3 Million of which also had (either) Influenza or Pneumonia
That's 46%
But are those Influenza comorbidities? Or Pnuemonia? Could be either. Which is why they lumped it together. So when you point to this and say "see! They counted Influenzadeaths as covid deaths!" they have plausible deniability and can say, no no, those are probably just pneumonia cases.
Thank you for that. Yes it's pretty annoying
The truth will come out sooner or later.
That’s what all this delta variant nonsense is about, the audit results are coming out and they need to have everyone shut up in their house communicating over lefty controlled media to prevent the truth from getting out.
Intentionally set the cycles high so they could call "everything" covid.
I heard a lady call into the David Webb show back in May or June last year. She claimed to be a medical coder and she said they they had a new code, PIC. Pneumonia, Influenza and COVID is what that purportedly stood for. Talked about the money hospitals were receiving for each confirmed case. Since then, my suspicions of bullshit were confirmed.
How the fuck are they mandating the shot based on incorrect testing? That is absolutely insane.
Its "emergency use authorization" and it killed all the animals in the animal trials, which is absolutely insane
Where did you get this info? Just want to be able to cite my source if I use what you're saying as a talking point
☝️ This. Mandating on bogus info under the guise of emergency use authority with availability of other treatments. ! There should be NO VAX, FULL STOP !
In my opinion this is the biggest news maybe ever... all of this for a test they knew was testing for the flu and the common cold... locking the world down.. destroying families and businesses and elections.. then killing people without informed consent with an experimental rna treatment..
My family has for the most part been pro vaccine and scared to death by the tv... this has been a huggggggeee eye opener for them 😊
Oh, just like all the crazy conspiracy theorists said!
I said something about this on the phone to an advice nurse, "no flu this year, can you believe it?"
She said, "oh because of the masks!"
I laughed and said "or are they calling all flu cases COVID?"
to which she laughed and said, "no way!"
Okay, honey.
Didn't we fucking say that a year ago when it happened?
I knew all along they were counting flu cases as covid cases. The flu MIGHT reduce in occurances with everyone on defense against viruses, but it would not virtually disappear.
Not to mention the countless lives that could have been saved if they had only been treated for the flu.
I don't see this tweet on his twitter feed
It was probably deleted. My entire instagram account was just deleted for posting it.
I would love to look at the document they link in the tweet from the CDC. Do you have the full URL?
Anyone have the cdc link to this? I don’t use twatter. This seems like a great read and red pill
Hey... the fucking light is finally going on. Sheesh this is not hard to Cypher out.
If anyone has the full URL for the link he posted, lots of people would love to see that.
Go to cdc.gov and search rt-pcr
I posted this exact pic on Lifelog and got shut down for three days. As soon as I was able to post things again, I posted it AGAIN only I typed it word for word instead of posting the "picture". It is still up.....I am so sick of this shit.
Incompetent asses
You forgot, they also can't tell the difference between common cold coronaviruses and the specific strain of coronavirus called COVID-19.
This is the twat who did his 'all Q believers are nonjobs piece and come back to the 'right' side. Fuck him and his months late to the obvious post
Don't trust Ezra. He may be good at pandering to us once every few weeks but he is not one of us.
Yeah, while he may be right on this one thing, I don't trust him at all. Pied piper.
Hmmmm.
This interview was what finally convinced me that Rebel News was not on our side: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdYxBY-69WE
Wow. I don’t need to be Canadian to respect Chris. He’s got them all after him. Why? Truths.
I think this whole exchange just got out of hand, all they are arguing about is a number "6 million Jews" and whether it's real or not, rebel news hosts being jewish are obviously going to defend that number as that's what they've been taught, they could have just agreed to disagree and moved on but both of them got butt hurt and triggered and ended the interview.
rebel news didn't censor or interrupt him and let him make his argument, both sides look bad after that argument probably because humans are just emotional retards generally, I wouldn't make much of that exchange other than a miss understanding from both parties.
Bothe Ezra and David kept saying that they just wanted Chris to have an opportunity to clarify his position and clear up any confusion. So that's what Chris did, but David kept trying to "correct" him. That's not reporting.
Nah david was just trying to provide the counter arguments that people make so he could make his argument to dispute them, only when they got the "6 million" question did david get emotionally attached and persist that chris was wrong, not the best journalism but it's still journalism, it happens all the time, you just move on to the next question at that point and let the viewers make up their own minds, just because the interview devolved into a debate on 1 question doesn't mean you need to walk out and shit talk each other.
Clash of 2 personalities disagreeing on contentious subject: suborn(david) vs sensitive(chris)
I disagree with you. Journalists, reporters, etc. are supposed to just report. When they try to correct they are entering into "opinion piece" territory. They can do that without a guest and just state their position. They were not allowing Chris to state and maintain his opinion.
No, they're not understanding this right and everyone needs to pay attention so we don't look stupid making claims that aren't true. A multiplex is a test that can identify more than one thing. If you take the current test for covid it can only tell you if you have covid or not. What the link is proposing is to have a test that can tell you whether you have covid, flu, or neither.