Are the vaxxed GMO and no longer qualifying as humans and therefore HAVE NO HUMAN RIGHTS? Thoughts, impressions, feels?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Question proposed while getting input from faraway friends.
News flash, you already are considered government property. Cattle.
The shot is just their brand.
Brandon is just getting started... 😈
But we are still owned .... but we can smell freedom!!!
Chattel acutally, and that word is why cattle are called cattle.
THE MORE YOU KNOW
What do you think a SSN is? It is so you get taxed for the rest of your life.
Thanks to Roosevelt selling us to the banks
Sicker than Big Mike's dong?
Unfortunately, yes
Haitians?
Kek true
And W Bush
Juicy Smolay?
Everyone w a ss# are considered chattel..per law of land/ land of sea. Theres that almost 2 hour video on Rumble.....wish I could save it rather than dig for it.
And taking loans with us as backing collateral/assets. I may have butchered that, but ya'll know. Maybe a more concise and legally minded fren can correct me.
Took me a minute to find these pics I saved as proof that we do indeed get traded like cattle on an exchange:
https://files.catbox.moe/lpfpx5.jpeg
And
https://files.catbox.moe/4z95lq.jpeg
PDF link to the Supreme Court Ruling on Transhumanism https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf
Thanks for this link Anon, very fascinating.
Just to summarize this judgement:
Isolation of specific gene sequences from DNA is not patentable
Synthesis of specific sequences (cDNA) by removing all the non functional elements is patentable
So mRNA sequences would be patentable. But the judgement specifically said that cDNA is patentable due to the considerable amount of work put in by the lab technicians in creating this.
Would the changes to the human DNA because of reverse transcriptase process with this mRNA be considered "considerable amount of work put in by the lab technicians" ? I do not know.
There is another patent that covers genetically modified organisms. I think that taken in conjunction with this might shed more light.
But this is in no way over - its very important to cleanup SCOTUS before further cases like this comes their way.
Awesome summary but wanted to add: The mRNA creates a complimentary DNA strand (cDNA), which does not occur in nature because it has all exons and NO introns. Therefore, the cDNA can be patented but gDNA or genomic DNA that can occur in nature including mutations cannot. Being able to patent a gene mutation would prevent other labs from making detection kits using specific gene sequences like the breast cancer gene mutation that they are talking about specifically.
So, if NO humans on earth are able to create this spike glycoprotein naturally and then they give you a gene therapy injection which changes your gDNA so that it now creates a protein it never did before...welp.
I am sure this is what you were leading up to, but I think its important enough to state it explicitly:
In future if people have had their genes mutated to create Spike proteins (or anything else due to future vaccines), NO ONE other than the patent holders will be able to create a kit to detect this. So they can claim its not happening and you will have no way to disprove it.
I read through that this morning. A friend passed it along to me. Most of it was over my head but was amazing the Supreme Court overruled lower courts to make it so. The case study was for breast cancer but they knew what they were arguing for back them in 2012-2013 and it wasn’t about woman’s health
Agreed on the false pretext they presented.
They were getting their ducks in a row for this.
This says nothing about transhumanism
The ruling is regarding what forms of DNA are patentable
And the vaccines contain DNA sequences
Yea no shit
This ruling still doesn't say anything about transhumanism or rights granted/removed as a result
There's plenty of evil demented shit in regards to this vaccine. We don't have to make shit up
There is lots of information out there on what these vaccines are leading to. This ruling just shows when they have allowed the altered DNA to be patented. Of course they aren't going to come out and say it openly but much like Monsanto and their GMO's, when they have altered humanity to such a level, you don't believe they will claim ownership once they have control over your body literally? In Moderna's own words they declare their vaccine to be an "operating system". https://foreignaffairsintelligencecouncil.wordpress.com/2021/03/15/transhuman-101-moderna-declares-covid-vaccine-to-be-an-operating-system-covid-is-about-control-not-a-virus/ and here is another article on the subject https://vaxxter.com/dna_vaccines_transhumanism/ Based on their track record IMO this is exactly the direction they are trying to lead us.
Of course they will try shit like that.
But they haven't yet and the courts haven't ruled on anything to that effect.
When they have enough control over the people there will be no resistance or need for a trial.
Would be a shame if we RoundUp these GMOmans
And gmo(wo)mans ! /s
I don't remember if it was them for immunity or the TPP crap going on that I went on a huge rant on fackbook. It was some bullshit social media campaign to change profile pics with solidarity with the lgbtiq+-404 movement while shit got pushed through. Only pushback was "what do you mean the tpp(as an example)?" People are so gullible to the sleight of hand.
Fraud vitiates everything.
This is literally the main reason I don't want the shots, other than my biblical stance.
I ran across Chimeras on an informational pilgrimage through the internet many moons ago, and that was some of the most sick twisted stuff I have ever ran across.
By doing what they are doing, they can, "legally" bypass all of the red tape surrounding experimentation on aninals and humans, by legally turning them into something that is VERY SIMILAR but technically NOT the same.
This is why when I heard how the "New Vaccine" was going to function, by operating off of the manipulation of our mRNA, I was like, these sick bastards.... And now, people are talking about it. It is very strange to me. But these are just my thoughts on the matter.
I say though, Good Question!!!
So I saw a clip on it and it references this Supreme Court case and I’ve read it but it specifically seems to say you can’t Monsanto humans. Link below, let me know.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf
Well, I have never been that far down the rabbit hole, and I have learned to say "Anything crazy is possible nowadays."
But, by their goofy logic, I can self-identify as a cow, a pig, or.... a HUMAN.
Their inability to think makes them that either way. They voluntarily give up their rights.
No they didn't give up their rights voluntarily! They were never told they were going to be genetically modified and not fully human...they were frightened In to taking a jab with no idea what was in it! Count yourself lucky that you knew and stop dissing the unfortunate!
No. They were not told. I don't believe they were even told about side effects because that was unknown until later.
Many still believe the vaccines are FDA tested, safe and approved. Even the medical community thinks this.
They are fools and idiots, but they did not know. They COULD have known. And for that failure they are guilty.
This just in, the cattle at the front door of the slaughterhouse are having a discussion on being misled.
I wasn't referring to anyone here as cattle so I apologize if that's how you took my comment. But what do the cattle know about the building and why they're all beings funneled in? Yesterday they were in the field eating grain.
What makes you give such a very harsh statemet? Look back ...have you ever had a vaccination? I am betting you have.....there was a lot of shit in that as there has been in every vaxx including aborted fetus baby cells ...taken from a viable baby with its blood supply intact and organs cut out while it was alive with no painkillers etc. You didn't know that ...just like these vaxxed didn't know...so if you ever were vaxxed you too chose convenience and safety over liberty. So whose is the psychopath now?
It is and it's not true. They are not psychopaths..they believe they are shielding them from a dangerous bioweapon that wicked Chinese people unleashed on them. The trust vaccines...they have been told since their first jab at a few days old it is to protect you from parents who loved them and cared for them. Do you expect them to believe their trusted doctor and priest and government and wonderful NHS are trying to deliberately kill them? And for every country to be doing it???? You expect too much.
Here in UK the government doesn't tell it's an experimental ge e therapy...they call it a vaccine...just like the polio vaccine that saved millions of lives.
If you can't see this consider that you are seriously lacking in empathy a psychopathic trait!
From a Biblical point of view, I question this as well. Most Christians believe (because they've been taught) that God saved Noah and his family because they hadn't sinned. This of course isn't true. God said all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. So then, why did God destroy all life (creatures) except a certain few including Noah, his family and two of every kind of animal and crawling thing?
I believe to answer this question we must heed a clue given to us in Genesis 6 and the Book of Enoch. In Genesis 6 the idea of human DNA manipulation is a given as the result of fallen angels having sex with human females in order to produce giants. However, the Book of Enoch goes even further, explaining that God waited until there was only one family bloodline that had not been genetically modified before He destroyed nearly all living creatures.
This tells me unequivocally that God has severe issues with DNA manipulation, the primary reason being that once one fundamentally tampers with the DNA structure that God put in place, it ceases to be the creature God had intended and in the case of a human being...quite possibly ceases to exists in the image of his/her Creator.
My main reason for not taking the RNA/DNA manipulation jab has little to do with the use of fetal tissue (although this is a very good reason to not take the death jab). But it has everything to do with whether or not a person is actually a human after having their gene manipulation therapy. I think it quite possibly crosses over into the realm of risking ones eternal security. I'm not saying one cannot be saved if they have the jab and those who are saved, according to God's Word, are always in the Lamb's Book of Life. However, I will not jeopardize my relationship with my Savior (even at the risk of losing everything)...especially given my understanding of How Jesus reacted to DNA manipulation in the past! He made sure everything was inundated with the cleansing power of WATER!!!!
It wasnt because Noah sinned, it was because he was righteous.
Big distinction.
DNA is also a coding medium, a language if you will; books and texts can be stored in dna sequences.
Rev 22: 18-19
For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
Don't mess with GOD'S design.
I have never believed fallen angels had sex with humans....they were giants and no woman could have carried a giants baby
angels appeared as men to Abraham and Sarai, and to Lot and the people of Sodam and Ghemorah....they had sex with human women and produced giants, and mythical beings....you really should do your due diligence on the subject....it doesnt say they were born 10 foot tall
Use your common sense....they would not be normal size babies. Stop taking the Bible as literal. It's like the Muslims taking their shoes off when the contex was leave off earthly thoughts...like what to buy for supper etc and other earthly thoughts. You do know what a psychopath is don't you? Their frontal lobes have become or never were attached so they have no connections to conscience. It's not something you should be using to describe people who were frightened and believed what they were told....a bit like you in fact
Well, you have no wiggle room with the Bible. It's written in such a way that you either accept it as completely accurate or you don't. I'm telling you what the Bible says was going on in those days. The case may be that all these women died giving child birth...this information isn't given. However, your argument doesn't hold water because women of every generation have given birth to very large people...because the BABIES DON'T NECESSARILY START OUT LARGE!!!! Think about what you say before you write...
So you really believe there was an apple a snake and two naked people? And they mated with whom? You are going to run into difficulties very quickly.
And yes mating with giants has to be physically impossible....giants femurs have been found over 5ft in length. A woman would be ripped apart.
And who told you that you accept the whole as accurate or nothing? Have you any idea of all the inconsistencies just in the four gospels alone? Have you any idea of the mistranslation s never mind interference by priests etc....or the fact that words have changed meanings in different languages.
You sound like a child believing in the fairy story they read
Then apparently you are not familiar with the book of Enoch which was taken out of the Bible and would appear as the first book before Genesis.
Yes I have seen the relevant chapters. I don't believe that the holy spirit is what people say it is either...it's a mistranslation of a word describing the annanuki whose craft glided over land and sea looking for victims....do some research. Sin too is a mistranslation from the original Greek...it means missing the mark....people taking the Bible literally has caused so many deaths and wars.
Agreed, you need to do research, because Noah lived a long time (900+ years) not to sin, but was righteous in God’s eyes enough to appoint him to build the Ark and save the animals before flushing the world of the Nelphilim and other giants...
Oh dear...there you go again.....believing everything in a literal sense.
Definitely not a shirley, but instead a Karen.
Karen's believe everything they are taught to believe is true...that's not me dear it's you. Critical thinking ! You don't apply it
As in the days of Noah and Lot...
Noah - DNA manipulation. Lot - rampant celebrated homosexuality.
the angels also taught sodomy. The men of Sodom knew they were angels....going after strange flesh is not limited to homosexuality between human males
The opposite. The unvaxxed are still outside of their new system's definitions.
Yes. It is the most evil use of weasel-talk to date. As revenge for Trump and daring to criticize them, the engineered this entire scenario just to get you to a vaccine. When that happens, they believe you no longer can claim human rights.
My vaxxed adult sons & daughters and their significant others are fully human, have committed no crimes that would deprive them of their rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. These are God-given rights and NO ONE can take those rights from my kids because of a vaxx. Anyone or any document that says different does not understand the Declaration of Independence or the Bill of Rights, nor basic genetic science. Cancer hijacks your DNA, and so do many other viruses... but you do not become anything other than human.
NO, the vaxx does not make you subhuman, or trans-human.
It may greatly damage your health or even prevent you from conceiving and carrying to term genetically healthy children, but damaged DNA only makes one unhealthy, not unhuman. We are all one human race. Do not let this unscientific theory divide you from those who were persuaded to take the vaxx. Divided we are weak, united we are strong. Anyone who is against the vaxx mandates- whether they are vaxxed or not- is still an ally.
The Supreme Court ruled on this I believe in 2012 and indeed considered property of the patent owner because the DNA sequence did not occur naturally.
It’s a harsh reality and only found out about 2 months ago.
Edited to add link:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf
Read last page of Justice Scalia’s opinion to save time.
Just about everyone I know is injected, and to tell you the truth, none hold an ill grudge towards me, nor do I do the same. No point on causing division in anyway even knowing what I know about this. They are adults and can make their own decisions.
On an ending note and on page 1 saw some symbolism:
“Argued April 15, 2013—Decided June 13, 2013“
Didnt the Titanic sink on April 15th 1913?
Scalia couldnt pick some other day he decided?
I think you are conflating this ruling about 'owning a patent' for the process by which they isolate a gene with the idea of owning a person. Their patent is on a therapeutic or investigative process in examining the gene.
Doesn't the emancipation proclamation pretty well cover this? We were born human... we are still human. Maybe we can focus on running for local public office instead of this.
I provided the documentation and his ruling, whether you want to hold me responsible for his opinion or not, that is on you, but this is called denial and shooting the messenger...
Others in this thread have mentioned this same ruling and came to same conclusion. I suggest you read it as it is apparent you have not even when it is one single paragraph I pointed out to you to consider.
Only time will tell if they still have their souls.
Said what I wanted to say much simpler than I would have.
Remember people, these are your Brothers and Sisters in the eyes of God. He'll deal with weighing their souls.
If OP was talking in regards to "human legality" (lower case) then I do not know.
human capital https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13037-commission-study-capital-budgeting
https://freedom-school.com/buck-act.pdf
in 2013, in a US Supreme Court case, Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., it was decided that corporations could create GMO humans by injection of foreign patented mRNA or DNA and could then claim them, living people, as GMO "products" owned by the corporation under patent.
http://annavonreitz.com/countryrunbystupidpeople.pdf
see also
https://search.freefind.com/find.html?si=9931410&pid=r&n=0&charset=UTF-8&bcd=%C3%B7&query=GMO
Well I know everyone here Hates Alex Jones but Jones also called this 10 years ago. He said they are trying to mix humans with other dna and shit so that you don't have rights as a human and they can treat you like an animal in their moral code because you gave up your free will
Of course he knows. His team.
10 years....thats a long time. It was only FIVE years ago that he licked James Alefantis' sweaty balls in public, as he apologized for all of us for "lying" about the Comet Pizza crew and John Podesta. Sobbing and bawling on video....
Remember how Podesta RAN to social media with his triumphant claims about how Jones "proved" we were crazy conspiracy theorists?
Good times....
1: I never saw the apology and it probably was linked to the time he was trying to settle the sandy hook lawsuit..not defending it but that shit gets messy and expensive
2: being right 20 to 100 times isn't magically wrong because you messed up a few times in your career. Most Jones haters cling to 2 things and ignore the fact that he has woken up more people than any other show or outlet and he has been right about nearly everything for 25 years.
Idc if you hate Jones, I care that millions of people have started navigating the world of conspiracy and being awake because of Jones work. You cant discredit people waking up. No one is perfect.
Oh no. I don't hate Jones.
Using only LOGIC here... and your efforts to cast my post as emotional is low mid-tier sophistication level. (decent, up to about 8th or 9th grade level)
The decision to avoid Jones' disinfo is INFORMED by facts and prior acts. When it gets CRITICAL, he's not there.
When the Comet Pizza story was just getting some mainstream attention, including kids/teens/20s especially, he gave Podesta and Alefantis and Co the biggest hall pass ever. Podesta was practically PROMOTING the Jones show...
There's a difference between "being wrong" and "LYING/misleading/DISINFO tactics".
The fact that Jones only sticks it in your arse 1 out of every dozen times you bend over isn't enough to qualify him as a trusted news source.
I don’t like this thinking, as it’s just as decisive as them throwing people who have not been vaccinated yet under the bus for anything and everything.
They want us divided in any way they can achieve that goal. Whether it’s race, religion, educational background, or vaccination status—it’s all a ploy to divide us.
I don’t enjoy the terms “Vax-tarded,” “GMO humans,” etc., as it perpetuates hate, just in the opposite direction that most of us receive.
By virtue of stating you're a "U.S. Citizen" on a license, passport, deed, etc. or agreeing you're a "taxpayer", a "resident", a "driver", etc., you've unwittingly signed away your both your natural and Constitutional rights and declared yourself a "federal employee", which is under the control of a foreign services corporation known either as "the United States of America (Inc.) {federal] or "UNITED STATES" [State/Municipal].
I think we all lost 'human rights' when corporations were given the same status as humans. The TTIP trading partnership exposed this nasty bit of lawfare. Humans were not allowed to know what the terms of the agreement were but corporations had full access.
I hate this line of thinking. It assumes the vaxxed aren't a bunch of well armed Americans, many of whom are older and, based on initial information, took the shots after a risk/benefit analysis.
The well armed make poor chattel.
I don't know, but plenty of viruses workby injecting RNA into your cells. Some even do full double stranded DNA.
This is crazy
mRNA can’t change your DNA, mRNA feeds into Ribosomes to make proteins.
A spiked protein is not a reverse transcriptase.
The action between the mRNA and “the cell” is the Ribozome making whatever is encoded in the mRNA.
It only becomes permanent if the DNA is modified to produce the spiked protein.
I know we think mankind can do this, but we can’t. We can barely splice in code edits using CRISPR/cas9, and even then, we don’t enough to do anything major like create a whole new gene.
u/#Wrong
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery, yet these patients most commonly are non-infectious. Here we investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for PCR-positive tests. In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome. To experimentally corroborate the possibility of viral retro-integration, we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT, and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed. Human endogenous LINE-1 expression was induced upon SARS-CoV-2 infection or by cytokine exposure in cultured cells, suggesting a molecular mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 retro-integration in patients. This novel feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/
u/#Fakenews
Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues
Prolonged detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA and recurrence of PCR-positive tests have been widely reported in patients after recovery from COVID-19, but some of these patients do not appear to shed infectious virus. We investigated the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the DNA of human cells in culture and that transcription of the integrated sequences might account for some of the positive PCR tests seen in patients. In support of this hypothesis, we found that DNA copies of SARS-CoV-2 sequences can be integrated into the genome of infected human cells. We found target site duplications flanking the viral sequences and consensus LINE1 endonuclease recognition sequences at the integration sites, consistent with a LINE1 retrotransposon-mediated, target-primed reverse transcription and retroposition mechanism. We also found, in some patient-derived tissues, evidence suggesting that a large fraction of the viral sequences is transcribed from integrated DNA copies of viral sequences, generating viral-host chimeric transcripts. The integration and transcription of viral sequences may thus contribute to the detection of viral RNA by PCR in patients after infection and clinical recovery. Because we have detected only subgenomic sequences derived mainly from the 3' end of the viral genome integrated into the DNA of the host cell, infectious virus cannot be produced from the integrated subgenomic SARS-CoV-2 sequences.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33958444/
OP stated mRNA from the vaccines can't change your DNA.
2 separate studies suggested reverse-transcribed RNA can change DNA. Considering the mRNA vaccine works in exactly the same way, hijacking your cellular machinery to manufacture the spike proteins, it's only common sense it's possible they can also alter DNA.
OP's statement is a hypothesis and nothing more. As OP presented it as fact, I labeled it as fake news.
This is only true if you believe the scientists who created the bioweapon and its vaccine years before the plandemic.
Do so at your own peril.
Here's a primer for doctors put out by the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, with instructions on how to "educate" parents over concerns these vaccines could modify DNA-
Can mRNA vaccines alter a person’s DNA?
The short answer to this question is “no,” but in and of itself that is not very satisfying, so let’s take a closer look. We can be confident that mRNA vaccines are not able to alter a person’s DNA for three reasons:
https://www.chop.edu/news/news-views-3-questions-you-will-get-about-new-mrna-vaccines
So as far as the process goes, it's been determined SARS-CoV-2 DOES have the reverse transcriptase enzyme these doctors swore it didn't have, based on the two studies I referenced above, which is the very reason those studies were so controversial.
There IS a possibility these vaccines can alter DNA based on the same mechanism discovered in SARS-CoV-2. There is no proof of that hypothesis because it hasn't been studied and will most assuredly not be funded by any of the pharmaceutical companies who have no problem injecting every man, woman, and child on the planet with these vaccines.
Also, what happens if somebody who's vaccinated gets infected with SARS-CoV-2 or another virus that has the reverse transcriptase enzyme? It's only logical DNA could be modified in those instances.
Looks solid to me.
If smoking weed can alter your DNA https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2174024/
Then injecting yourself with anything or something we don't know could alter your DNA
I suppose that is valid. I would note that in the cannabanoid example, the mechanism to modify the DNA is a part of the system.
I don’t buy the mRNA in the vaccine is modifying DNA, though.
But I could be proven wrong.
I guess the question really is how do we know its not altering DNA. They have lied about everything else.
I don’t see how it can, the mRNA feeds into a Ribosome that produces a membrane spiked protein which eventually ends up on the outer surface of the cell.
The end. Nothing happened to the DNA.
I get your point. However what I'm saying is that how do you know without a 100% absolute doubt that the clot shot is just an mRNA shot. If it were just an mRNA shot then i have to completely agree with your conclusion. I'm saying we don't know and we should not speculate that we do know. To further my point we have been consistently lied too regarding all matters coronavirus related. I think there's a lot more too this than any of us know.
Maybe.
Trash Blood Mutants
Fun Fact: 10/10 Mutants don't like being called Mutants. Perhaps Genomically Corrupted Cretins?
What if we already are 🤯 GMOs
They could be declared a toxic hazard by nonvaxxed people. Maybe 2 sections of restaurants can be designated. I'll not enjoy eating near those freaks.
Have you ever had a vaccine? Gone abroad? You have to have them...you too have no idea what is in the vaccines you were jabbed with either!!! They are not freaks.
All my family has had the Vax. As many of the people on here. I would be looking like an asshole if I wasn't making a joke.
But they do consume. Zombie Apocalypse, anyone?