What, exactly, does PDJT mean by “President on behalf of the United States of America”
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (65)
sorted by:
probably he is missing a comma between President and on behalf... like he means he was making the phone call on behalf of the american people. Thats my best bet (grammar nerd, here).
Nice.
Exactly the idea behind: mistakes do have meaning.
Knowing this changes things, does it not?
Head to the front of the class, please.
This is when that red pen comes in handy. My 86 yr old mom corrects my texts with the ol (sp) !
You are correct, but I don't think mistakes happen by accident.
..That's.. what a mistake is..
KEK!!
code! Someone like the queen or fauci gonna fall into a deep comma over the weekend! lol
hahahaha
OK, that's pretty funny. That's some really good anon kekkiness right there.
The famous dangling participle that your teachers warned you about!
Strunk & White would have re-written for clarity: I didn't say anything wrong in the call, which I made on behalf of the United States of America while I was President.
Assuming he's dangling his participles with a strategic purpose, I have no clue what it would be. It's technically correct, just awkwardly worded.
This is indeed extremely odd. Is this lawyer-speak? Because he was President of the United States at the time, not President on behalf of the United States.
But wait. He said 'On behalf', not 'In Behalf'.
I think there is a clue here. I don't think our Very Stable Genius President would include 'on behalf' with no reason. He is a very thoughtful and calculating person I think, but he likes to project the image of somebody who just shoots from the hip.
Oh btw here is the source I used for In behalf vs on behalf:
https://www.grammarbook.com/blog/definitions/in-behalf-of-vs-on-behalf-of/
I love stuff like this.
Basically the reason Trump said this, is the charge against him is he was making the call on his on behalf on his own self interest.
and I just saw this.
Georgia prosecutor requests special grand jury in probe of Trump’s efforts to overturn state’s election results
So Trump's statement is almost certainly in response to this. If you remember this is about the call where asked the election officials to "find 11,780 votes."
And if it goes to court...
He can submit evidence.
Very clever.
I'm very sure he doesn't want to get indicted and does not want to go to court.
He meant the call was on behalf of the US, not his presidency on behalf of the US
Not lawyer speak. Just less than correct articulation.
...nothing wrong in the call, which I made on behalf of the United States of America when I was President
It was not on behalf of the corporate "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA".
not necessarily, there can be presidents of a company. the President of Coca-Cola is an actually role inside the company, sometimes its the CEO in the case of Coke it is actually the COO
this is what I'm. thinking too
That’s what I was hoping it meant.
The President is actually the Chief Magistrate of the Republic, not the Attorney General. The power executed by the Attorney General is delegated by the President. So, to me he was acting on behalf of the United States on the call.
When I read the transcript and listened to clips of this call, President Trump came across as someone conducting a clever interrogation, some might say a sting. He stated set of facts and let the Georgia team respond. He gave them a chance to retract several times.
There was a point where he cutoff Cleta Mitchell and made a comment about how much he knew about the voting machines, something to the effect it is bigger than people realize. The call is characterized by the DS and MSM as Trump begging Georgia to change the vote total. That is completely wrong.
President Trump is telling them he has the receipts and is giving them a chance to come clean. Maybe I’m wrong, but this call was the President acting in his role as Chief Magistrate and he was rattling their cage to watch their reaction. Hopefully we see something come of it pretty soon.
I think your explanation makes a lot of sense
Why not actually take this argument to a court where it would actually matter?
That’s the problem, every court so far has found a b.a. technicality to do nothing.
do you mean proof? Because they haven't really made their case.
I mean standing or that they waited to long to file were some of the reasons given for not hearing the cases.
That is what you think it says, but it is not what is says.
He did not say: I called on behalf of the United States of America, although I forgive you for thinking such. I would do the same, except ... it says:
It is in inference to think his call was made on behalf of the United States of America.
In effect, he is supposed to be President on behalf of the PEOPLE, and not on behalf of a corporation.
So, the question should really be posed. For whom was he REALLY there?
I got it. You are very clever. Good for you. A corporation.
Yes, indeed.
So before writing it off as a third rate punk fat finger slip party, maybe, just maybe, he exactly conveys what he means to say?
The call to Georgia was on January 2, 2021. According to Patel Patriot, it seems as though Trump set devolution into action in mid-December. That would change Trump's role from President to "agent"?
The question is does that agent still retain the powers of the executive/chief magistrate? Also even after Jan 20, 2021?
This might be of interest:
https://slagfa.substack.com/p/the-wartime-presidency-part-ii
So many possibilities. But I don't see the continuation of biden's "presidency" being one of them.
I read that but this guy says he's president in exile, while I'm curious if there's a difference in just being an agent or are they pretty much the same thing
Honestly, I think it’s just a punctuation error. It seems the “flow” of the sentence should be as follows: “I didn’t say anything wrong in the call, made while I was President, on behalf of the United States of America, to look into the massive voter fraud which took place in Georgia.” In other words, he (the President at that time) made the call on behalf of the people of the United States of America. One comma changes the whole syntax of the sentence.
Yeah.
I get that many anons want to find something... anything ... in the messages. It's a bit like an addiction to hopium. But in cases such as the above, it's so easily explained if you simply reframe the context - to look for the meaning the utterance is intended to convey, rather than to look for some deep, cryptic meaning because its unusual.
I mean, let's think rationally. We already have the Q board. Last time I checked, close to 5000 drops, a number of which interface with POTUS tweets at the time. Not only do THEY have it all, we also have it all.
Q is not posting for a reason. That aspect of the operation is either closed, or on pause. What on earth would DJT be wanting to tell us now in a cryptic tweet that we need?
Honestly, if you realized that DJT is Q+, that Pompeo is up with the Q project, and that Dan Scavino is also part of it, then why do you need constant affirmation and updates that keep you guessing for what? 12 months now?
We have devolution, and more and more info that illuminates the Q drops is emerging as we speak.
Some frens constant need to find a scrap or reassurance in every little detail - it seems designed to exhaust one.
Occams Razor.
Besides, we have more than we know!
I take it he is emphasising that he considers the role that of a servant, rather than a master. President of is like saying you preside over, whereas on behalf of is rather a role of advocate representing the nation as a servant, which is actually better framing, more in the spirit intended by the founders. Contrast with the imperious Obama, or the power lust of Hillary. Trump never misses an opportunity to set himself apart and embarrass the adversary.
President of the United States = President of the corporation known as "The United States".
President on behalf of the United States = President who is the agent for the 50 states which are united
??
United States for America
He gave the power back to the people. From that point forward he was speaking on behalf of the American people.
it means he was representing the United States of America as acting President.
no brainer
My initial reaction is that he is simply a man representing or in servitude of Americans, NOT one presiding OVER the citizens.
Though I haven't seen an unintended typo yet.
He should make that his official title while in exile.
I dont take it mean anything remarkable in this message. He did serve on behalf of all Americans (whether they wanted it or not reeee!) with his America first agenda. So on behalf of doesnt seem that misplaced to me in his message. He was but a utility of the constitution.
Grammar Nerds write his memo’s.
Follow this link:
https://greatawakening.win/
Sorry. I was trying to be funny.
Good luck with getting the full list! Sounds like a worthy project! Godspeed!
OK, that was uncalled for.
Funny nonetheless. Updoot for comic effort.