Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

639
Tulsi Gabbard tweeting about Durham investigation!! Can you feel the wave forming? (media.greatawakening.win) N C S W I C
posted 3 years ago by lsdQ 3 years ago by lsdQ +643 / -4
152 comments download share
152 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (152)
sorted by:
▲ 101 ▼
– pnwhomebrewer 101 points 3 years ago +102 / -1

I don’t trust anyone with ties to the World Economic Forum.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 49 ▼
– deleted 49 points 3 years ago +49 / -0
▲ 29 ▼
– Mister_Winston 29 points 3 years ago +29 / -0

Ok so none of that surprises me.

After the NXIVM thing, it seems like small cults can be used like local franchises that fall under a larger umbrella of a cabal cult, which functions like a holding corporation. The cult practices are just another form of control, like pedophilia.

Edit: Her cult was a criminal organization. Here's one expose': https://www.meanwhileinhawaii.org/home/butlersweb

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Phishhed44 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Awesome…thanks!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– MichaelConservative 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

It is confusing why she keeps dropping red pills whilst being a globohomo. Is she looking for street cred among conservatives? Because that s!@#$ is long gone for globo-homos.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– Phishhed44 18 points 3 years ago +18 / -0

She sees the future, and the D-Party is crumbling. Dumb Conservatives may give her credit, but she’s no Conservative. She’s WILY.

wily adjective

  1. skilled at gaining an advantage, especially deceitfully
permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– MichaelConservative 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

This is true.^ I'm not against crediting the correct ideology, while not approving of the person as a whole. AKA, bad people can speak truths, and we can affirm those truths and be glad it is spoken. This does not tie us to that person. Even God uses the wicked to carry forth his plan. I believe that is what we are seeing here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Phishhed44 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

I like that outlook. 👍🏽

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– CirclebackGinger 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Yeah, and people that have historically classified themselves as liberals but were basically forced to come over to the right because they aren’t a full blown commie, they all love Tulsi G. 🙄 Dave Rubin couldn’t fawn over her enough when he had her on his podcast. The short clip I saw was nauseating! Lol. I trust TG about as much as I trust Bill Maher and people on the right trying to refer to him as being “based”. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Phishhed44 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Then you’re AWAKE!! 👍🏽😎

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ChronicMetamorphosis 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

She’s WILY.

As in Dr Wily

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Mister_Winston 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

It's not confusing, she's just using the same scam tactic that RINO's and Conservative Inc. have used on us for 30 years. Say all the right things to seduce conservatives, then backstab us at strategic moments.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MichaelConservative 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

But I don’t know any conservatives who like her. I only know conservatives who appreciate that a Democrat uttered truth once. All have said that doesn’t mean they would ever vote for her.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Mad_Maximo 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

She sees what the current DS is. Old, faulty, not up to standards.

She's ousting them while making a play to be a head of what come from the fallout.

A modern day Romulus, if you will.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– MichaelConservative 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

^The most concerning possibility, stay out of the way as the DS falls apart, while the families no one knows about emerge as the new DS take over again shortly afterward, appearing at first to be on our side, but always carrying a knife in the other hand. She could easily be the new Hillary in 5 - 10 years.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Mad_Maximo 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

If DS crumbles the way Q alludes to, the current Democrat establishment would take a generation before people start become lured by its Sirens again.

But until that time, those who head it would likely enjoy the splendor of control and power over their servitors, without a prying eye.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– HenryTheRed 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

PROPAGANDA! The devil will lie to you 100 times to deceive you once. Ted Cruz will come back around to lie again, he got punched the fuck down after his Jan 6th statement but he is still waiting to sell us out. Tulsi will do the same.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MichaelConservative 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I don’t disagree brother. I only stated that we can promote a good ideology when we see it and that at this point in the game, that’s all we can judge, you’re right in that there are no heroes for us to look up to. If someone a sleeper, white hat, I’m sure that will become known, I don’t think she is. Anything is possible though

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– HenryTheRed 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

You have to think of this as placing bets, or managing stocks. Stock are really good because you can bet both FOR and AGAINST the stock. The only goal you have is to make money. You want to place enough bets to cover the spread. What is the spread? We are the spread. Just need to be believable enough to get just enough of the vote for it to be close. Biden's team will handle the rest and get you across the finish line.

You need strong people like Hill Dog to anchor the party. But then you need others to help in congress or senate (lower case for a reason). You look out and see that if you can get 80% of the people to vote for Dem A, Rep B and edge out MAGA C... that is winning. Not every asshole has to be direct, most need to be subtle.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– queue-anon 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Do you have a website to her yoga cult. I would love to infiltrate.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Whirlybot 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Actually, Hillary made some really detrimental comments about her a couple of years ago out of the blue. I think some of this is just TG getting a couple of blows in response.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +4 / -2
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 21 ▼
– deleted 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– Copperselectrons 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

They all say it. Tho technically you are right, even DT says democracy at times. So then what? You trust no politician period. Which is good actually. Bc we cant.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– p8riot 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

I trust Ron Paul above any other politician based on VOTING RECORD, but even he backed down after the RNC stole the nomination from him in 2012. His electors were ready to go to war after that but he caved into party unity the same way Bernie did in 2016.

That said Ron Paul gave Trump a "B" for what he says and a "C-" for what he does -- and this was before allowing mask precedence and pushing vaccines etc https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/02/16/ron_paul_grades_trump_presidency_b_for_what_he_says_c-_for_what_he_does.html

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ChronicMetamorphosis 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Jesse Waters makes a lot of good points.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– p8riot 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Yes but it only seems like a good thing because you (we) agree with his points. A journalist really should never be interjecting their own opinions and framing questions in a biased manner. At most they should only direct a line of questioning in a socratic fashion.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– lsdQ [S] 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

I hear you, but people do change and see the light.

I dont know whether she did or not, or whitehats are controlling her social media accounts, it doesnt matter to me, all I care about is normies getting redpilled and getting info they wont get from the lying media.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– propertyofUniverse 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

You'll know if she changes because she will clearly repudiate all her history with the WEF etc. Until then, she's cabal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– propertyofUniverse 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I'm sorry, you are right it was the CFR, and I will never trust her.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– muhqtardtho 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

It's both.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +4 / -1
▲ 4 ▼
– Th4rd_R3ich 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

What she's saying is completely true though.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– bdizzle3000 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

pence, graham, mconnell all say things that are true sometimes too.
what if i told you....gasp...that politicians say things because they think will get them elected?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Th4rd_R3ich 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I dunno. What if you told me that?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– bdizzle3000 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

well i hoped it might facilitate some critical thinking about who funds candidates, why they say the things they say and what ulterior motives they may have.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Th4rd_R3ich 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I feel like that's a separate issue though. One can say true and empowering things, yet still have negative intentions. I don't think it takes away from the validity of what they're saying though. One must just be aware of WHY it is they are saying them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Lopeover 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Yup, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.

permalink parent save report block reply
View 12 more comments
▲ 22 ▼
– sethm85 22 points 3 years ago +22 / -0

She is a wolf in sheep's clothing..

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– newchina 9 points 3 years ago +10 / -1

Fuck Tulsi! She’s only saying this now because it’s become very public. NEVER trust her.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– MichaelConservative 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

I don't think any of us trust her. My wife, who is more main line conservatism (she's starting to wake up), she still doesn't trust Tulsi, but like many of us here, she appreciates the truth bombs that are dropped, while maintaining a healthy level (aka max) of suspicion about Tulsi. The problem she is going to have if she's trying to use this to gain credibility with us, is that she'll be standing on a bridge in the middle, where one end is already burned out (Conservatives), and she's lighting a match on gas covered connections on the other side of the bridge (Liberals). She'll be all alone in the middle, and probably get taken out by the cabal for coloring outside the lines. They will use her as a martyr who reached across the isle to vilify the Republican party, and those dang QANON-ers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– deleted 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deltadog 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

What's her opinion of Joe Rogan as of 2 hours ago?

https://youtu.be/1d8D47C0PsI

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– sackofwisdom 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Gaaay. Joe had that super muscley dude who's friends with Jordan Peterson and wrote that kid book about... fighting bullies or something? Anyways, they both gushed over Tulsi for like 20 minutes. Bleh.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– NoApologyTour 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

They are positioning Tulsi to be the controlled opposition to the Clinton arm of the Democratic Party. Statements like these will give her “legitimacy” to run as a change candidate if the Clintons go down.

Nothing changes the fact that she’s a WEF controlled asset.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– BTFO 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

This. The Cabal plays the long game and has backup plans for their backup plans.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– pcpoet 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

think jimmy carter when looking at Tulsi.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 17 ▼
– 6thcolumn 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

They do this to confuse you to think they are on your side. SHe is not. She is a puppet as well.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– CynthiaQ 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

She's like the Nikki Haley of the left.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TakeItBack 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Muh duh-mockracy.......idiot

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– DickAllcocks 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

She’s WEF. What’s her endgame?

Probably political recapture.

Anyone got ideas?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– NoApologyTour 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Her endgame is to position herself as a change candidate within the party. When the winds shift the media coverage will throw their full support behind anti-establishment Tulsi to clean things up.

Think of how they supported and positioned Obama as being a wise anti-war candidate for voting against war in Iraq.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– theW0knessHurts 7 points 3 years ago +8 / -1

Hey guys, remember Tulsi was the only Democrat to not vote to impeach Trump and she was no longer in congress for impeachment hoax 2. If u ask me I think someone from Trump team through back channel told her to step aside in congress because of what's about to probably happen so she isn't caught up in the mess. I know GAW doesn't like her, but I think it's worth mentioning since she is a Vet, and usually anti war/intervention, not a fan of economic policies, but potentially an American Patriot at heart because of how much she bucks dem establishment. Trying to give alternatives to group think because it helps us build profiles and maybe provide insight as to what may be happening

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– MichaelConservative 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

She needs to denounce Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum, and the Big Steal 2020 at a minimum if she wants a seat at the table.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– theW0knessHurts 2 points 3 years ago +3 / -1

She probably doesn't need a seat at the table because of what she saw at the DNCCP where she was 2nd in Command at 1 point, resigned from her position in 2015/2016 because she saw them rigging elections and their corruption, she probably doesn't want to deal with the headachs that come from being at the table and what comes next. Her voting present instead of yes to impeach Trump may have caught the Presidents attention, and probably didn't want her getting caught up in the takedown that's coming because Trump felt that while he may not agree with "politics" she is a American Patriot who isn't currupt from the other side. Maybe more like a Grey hat rather than black hat swamp creature. I'm just looking at this as she was the only one who called bs on the Russiagate stuff the whole time, which is pretty significant now that lamestream may no longer be able to deny what happened.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MichaelConservative 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

when i said seat at the table, i mean after the takedown of the cabal

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– theW0knessHurts 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

My point being she probably doesn't want one considering she's now out of public office. . . Sorry for the rambling thats comming next but I say this because she has a history of stepping down when certain things about corruption are found out and just going around speaking about it afterwards. Almost like a Trojan horse or a spy/plant agent to help get info out about an organization. If i were in her position i would just stay out of it and just use my former office title and ex to talk and give validity to what I write. She may be part of some long plan for a patriotic opposition that needs to be established because I do think she has integrity for identifying the correct course of action on matters of national sec (her stance on China is a bit weak) but I wouldn't be as upset if she was say in power over biden, yes she's not good on other issues but national sec is my main issue for who I want as potus and she at least strikes me as America 1st to some extent. But she prob wants to retire from the major involvement eventually if she hasn't done so already

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ -1 ▼
– Heracles -1 points 3 years ago +2 / -3

What table exactly? You sound ridiculous.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MichaelConservative 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

-.- When the government as we know it collapses, there will be ample opportunity for people to fill those voids (govt positions). I think she will try to slip in aiming to look like a centrist even though she isn’t. But I would be willing to change my mind if it came out that she was actually working on our side behind the scenes, if that was her role. I doubt that to be the case but at this point I wouldn’t be surprised.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– CirclebackGinger 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Dan Crenshaw is a vet too and we all see how that’s playing out..just sayin. 🤷🏼‍♀️ I love our vets and I’m all about supporting them in anyway we can as civilians. However, just because you’re a vet doesn’t mean you’re immune to corruption or that we should just trust every vet that’s ever lived.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– theW0knessHurts 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I hear you about Dan and Vets, and I haven't looked too much into him myself, but I don't think he has as much integrity as tulsi does due to the fact that she stepped down after figuring out there was corruption. She's was really silent about the rigged election when u saw her on Joe rogan, but it almost seemed like she knew there was more to the situation that meets the eye almost as if she was in the know and just wanted to distract from it. Again I ask that u imagine a scenario where she does not vote to impeach trump,, catching trumps attention because he knows how phony it is, and is like wow she has guts to buck the dems, because that itself was some kind of test, and trump tapped tulsi saying something along the lines of "don't get caught up in the comming storm, you're a good person". Dan has never done something that bucks the norm in a truthful way from what I can tell, and has done nothing but dissapoint

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– theW0knessHurts 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

More to my point of her being a potential military agent/asset. They've made movies about this sort of thing where a very "leaves" runs for office and takes down the cabal on behalf of military. Maybe a DIA(Defense Intel Agency - which is Military) not CIA asset, which may be the true patriot intelligence agency. Almost like she was there to gather intel on dem corruption so they had enough info to put their plan onto action to take down the cabal

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– theW0knessHurts 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

U mean pete buttplug. Also if I'm not mistaken one of his parents was part of the American community party, sooooo this guy definately sets off red flags on top of the fact he's a global homo.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +8 / -1
▲ 18 ▼
– Emyrylde 18 points 3 years ago +19 / -1

Problem is Tulsi would be Hillary 2.0.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Lopeover 10 points 3 years ago +11 / -1

She more of a Jacinda Ardern type, not Killary..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GimmeMemes 2 points 3 years ago +3 / -1

So she's a tranny?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ -1 ▼
– LetsGoFishing -1 points 3 years ago +0 / -1

Yes. This is the browbone, jaw, giant neck and skin of a man:

https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/GettyImages-1204959501.jpg

https://i.insider.com/5e615d6cfee23d5735137ed6

Had a lot of well done surgery dince, but airbrushes his pics to hell.

If you're not convinced look up before and after shots of FFS ( full facial surgery).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– theW0knessHurts 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I would just like to say that I respectfully disagree with this accusation of tyranny trap. However the NZ prime Minister total tyranny trap. Just my 2 sense as a random commentor

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LetsGoFishing 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

It's not an accusation, it is just that when I look at Gabbard, I see an obvious man under the hair and makeup. Women can have some masculine features, but when one has all of them, especially a "woman" in politics or entertainment, many were raised from birth as the opposite sex in satanic bloodline families. The inversion/persevsion of God's creation is a done as a ritualistic offering.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– James_Wilson 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Nice thing about this, is that we can repost and the left will accept her as a messenger for the most part. As soon as we repost something from any conservative source, the first response is "Oh they're crazy because...".

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Bedminster 5 points 3 years ago +6 / -1

She's right and fuck her! Commie bitch.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +5 / -1
▲ 3 ▼
– chicagotrauma 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

She will always be a gun grabber

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Copperselectrons 3 points 3 years ago +6 / -3

Good job calling them out by TG. She may not be trustworthy herself but theres little or no evidence shes one of them, just bc shes a part of some globalist council. Maybe shes there for other reasons, maybe not. But she does not help sustain the cabals biggest lies and hoaxes.

I knew the majority of comments would be against her. But remember she fights against dem/cabal narratives and actions, works to expose them. When she went to Syria to get evidence for herself of that big lie, it was strong stance against a major persisting hoax. What about that? For being the thinking group sometimes the comments in ga lack thinking. Go ahead dv.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +5 / -4
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +3 / -1
▲ 2 ▼
– GirlGoat144 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

She was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, but they scrubbed her name. It's alphabetically listed in this archive...

https://web.archive.org/web/20190501160516/https://www.cfr.org/membership/roster

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– peachtriot17 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Well, she would know. She's one of "them". I don't trust TG as far as I can spit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– heebiejeebie 2 points 3 years ago +9 / -7

the reason that Tulsi did not win the nomination was that she was not a puppet... clearly she was the strongest candidate of the whole damned bunch... but she could not be controlled by the cabal... she seemed more conservative than many conservatives... thus they tossed her out... proving that presidents are selected... on BOTH sides.... this needs to be fixed...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 30 ▼
– deleted 30 points 3 years ago +30 / -0
▲ 15 ▼
– Emyrylde 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

I am waiting for them to get really desperate and form a new party in the ashes of the Democratic Party and run a Crenshaw/Gabbard ticket. They are the same.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– heebiejeebie 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

you may be right... but at the same time Trump did go to Davos... does that mean that he's now one of them just because he stepped into the house of the scum? i'm just saying that Tulsi is saying the right things at this moment in time... much of was she says IS good for the country. at the same time... i'd rather picture her tits than Dan's... kek

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– BasedCitizen 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Trump went as a disruptor. He preached MAGA, was booed, all the media "fact checked" his speech, and Schwab stated he would not invite him back. So sure, Trump went to Davos.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– BasedCitizen 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Yep. She is singing siren songs for the centrists in a chess move meant to pay out at a later time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– kish-kumen 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Damn, Crenshaw is just hawt!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– propertyofUniverse 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Oh no! You are attracted to the wrong sort!

Better watch out for that!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– kish-kumen 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Some transgender men (transwomen) are remarkably better looking and feminine than liberal women. As a red blooded American male, I can admit some transwomen are gorgeous.

They're still mentally ill though. And they're still men. Wouldn't want to be with one because I'm not a homosexual, and wouldn't choose a relationship with someone with a severe mental illness like GID or schizophrenia.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– propertyofUniverse 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I didn't mean that, I mean attracted to cabal people.

For example: Tulsi is good looking, but really untrustworthy. If I were strongly attracted to her, I'd know I was out of whack!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– kish-kumen 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Mild attraction to a good looking female of the species.

The only strong attractions I'm interested in nuclear force carriers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– kish-kumen 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Lol sorry, that makes sense. Kek

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– papagiorgio-g 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Tulsi speaks a lot of sense. That said, she has CFR ties and was one of Klaus Schwab's young leaders. I don't trust her.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Cpleb 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

what if shes a sleeper? If she was deep state ( which she most likely is), why did they ruin her nomination? I think she would have carried better than Hildawg? I mean Killary didnt even win 2008 against a no-name senator....how could she have won 8 years later?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Blandeaux 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

They need her later. Why sacrifice a knight when a pawn will do.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Cpleb 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

good point..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Cpleb 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Good points...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CirclebackGinger 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I know, for some reason it reminds me too much of “comrades”. Socialist red flag! 😳🤷🏼‍♀️😬

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MichaelConservative 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

... but ... to make this movie even WILDER, what if she played the part that well. I would not be surprised to find out that some of our enemies end up being allies, and some of our allies end up being our greatest foes. We need to always keep 1 thing in the forefront (even with Donald Trump or Michael Flynn, etc.), the ideology of the conservative viewpoint is what matters, not the carrier. To that end, this carrier (whether or not having any role in advancing / returning to our nation's beginnings, what we're conserving) is saying conservative things, which are good, we can commend the good and condemn the bad without being tied to that person's entire belief system. We are not the retarded left. In fact, every human on earth has varying beliefs that ought not to be tied down to a particular person. We come together on this forum because we align primarily with the idea that what our founding fathers created was the best form of government, and our ancestors have allowed it slip into a tyrannical bureaucracy. We here want to take the government back to where it belongs, out of the power of a few families, or round about 800-1,000 people, and into the hands of "We the People"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– CynthiaQ 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

limited and temporary is the new safe and effective.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– Blandeaux 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Negative she dropped out when the cabal told her to she is a Trojan horse mark my words. She was complicit in the DNC setting up Joe as candidate out of nowhere. Complicit in the election fraud, j6. She is the Democrats new Bernie. A Trojan horse. Just like Crenshaw.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Cpleb 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

nice read

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– CirclebackGinger 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

This! ☝🏻

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– lsdQ [S] 7 points 3 years ago +8 / -1

Yep! Remember when they put a fake CGI zit on her face during Dem debate? And kept changing rules for who will qualify for debates, to keep her out? They were pulling out all the dirty tricks to kill her campaign.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– lsdQ [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Yep same. They sent me articles from Axios in response "proving" she is a "Russian asset" lol. Then I gave up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MichiganMAGAMan 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

Dude you need to pull your head out of your ass. This bitch is fake and controlled op.

Her past is suspect as hell.

She is used so moderates can point to a dem and say they aren't all socialist. She is used so conservatives can claim dems aren't all bad.

She supports reparations, gun control, abortion, etc, etc. The list goes on.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Elle4gotMyPW 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Agree, she is presented as a moderate to firther erode rights, 2A.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MichiganMAGAMan 2 points 3 years ago +3 / -1

It honestly makes me so angry when conservatives prop her up. To me it is basically saying that she is doing the job the deep state gave her well.

Worst part is she does and says all these things out in the open for everyone to see and hear.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dreadnought61 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Klaus Gabbard... I trust her about as far as I can lift my apartment building... NOT!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BidenIsAPedoFreak 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Lol she’s a grifter - but a lot of folks will suddenly become freedom loving patriots in the coming days

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Brent75 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Ohhhhhh crap! There is more water bleeding through those dam cracks! Quick DemoLibs use those wet cow patties to clog the holes! No forget the gloves idiots! Just grab and pack! Hey you! Don’t worry if it’s spraying back in your face! Pack that shit faster! Trust Me muhuhuhuhahahahaaaaa! It’ll work!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– GirlGoat144 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Decent article ~ https://thenewamerican.com/don-t-be-fooled-tulsi-gabbard-is-a-globalist-in-sheep-s-clothing/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– fuckdemswithcactus 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

controlled op #wef

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– DoMagnum 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

She has a strong instinct for survival. Most dems do not.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1
▲ 1 ▼
– PhDinNY 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Why does she continue being in the Democrat party? Is she pro-abortion? That would seem to be the only issue of that vile party that could tip the scale for someone of mostly right-mind (definitely wrong-minded if you side with the pro-abortion people). I'm still trying to figure out what policies of the modern Democratic party appeal to anyone!

Ok, I read some of the comments and kind of understand what she is all about. It's a shame that someone from a military background seems to be so far off what they swear allegiance to when joining the military.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– PhDinNY 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I read more about her, and it appears that it is VERY rare that she says ANYTHING that is not in line with the disgusting Democrat party, and only now that she isn't in office, is she even willing to say something like this.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– HippieNinja17 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

All I can see now Is I SLUT

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– RoloTomassi1723 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Sorry Tulsa GTFO with "our democracy " we see you

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deltadog 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I trust this person about the same as I trust Elon or Rogan.

Rats on a sinking ship fighting for boards of wood, meanwhile I'm cozy af on my inflatable Q raft.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1
▲ 0 ▼
– OldGoat1953 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Bye Tulsi. If you see her getting on your plane, don’t go. This assertion, though true, imho does nothing to highlight Gabbard’s own shadowy background.

I was in a guru cult myself back in 1970, so I hesitate to criticize, but I wasn’t a bigwig in it, and soon left it laughing. I’m too cynical, and too skeptical to take her seriously as Presidential material. Can you say Subud here?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Welcome

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield - Together We Win

Rules

Q Supporters:
This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"

Follow the Law:
No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!

No Bad Behavior!
No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!

Civil Discussion ONLY:
They want you divided.
They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.
Divided you are weak [no collective power].
Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].

No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion:
Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.

Questions and Concerns: All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.

Expand your thinking:
Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Topics related to flat earth theory, faked moon landings, and chemtrails are explicitly prohibited on The Great Awakening. Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!

No doomers, shills, or tards: THIS IS AN ELITE RESEARCH BOARD. If you can't use common sense you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding. Q said "We are saving Israel for last," and so are we. And if you're a tard, oh, man.

General Rules:

-Mods used to issue warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. We don't, anymore. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

-Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current. We try to keep an open mind, but... c'mon.

-Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum. No crap, off-topic memes

-HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO participation only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait. Keep your comments high effort. No BS.

-No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, frogs!

-Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info trash, pls. Excessive, low-effort posting may earn users vacations!

-Keep it honest and accurate.

-Patriots.win / Q Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, this train still has no brakes.)

-Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their command of Q, sincerity, and respect to others.

Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING! (Hi, Mike! You LOSER!)

Resources

  • WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD
  • "River of Search" script:
  • GAW post formatting tips
  • Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)
  • Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4
  • Browse Drops from the beginning
  • QProofs.com
  • Learn to read the Q map
  • Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)
  • Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources
  • Trumps twitter archive
  • POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm
  • Pedosta and DNC dumps
  • GIFs & QPosts
  • Poll Post Format
  • SPY ON US! See: mod Logs
  • The Greatest Show on Earth!
  • New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?" DO NOT MISS THIS PODCAST!

Disclaimer

Posts and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the GreatAwakening.win or Patriots.win administration.

Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 6 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nndt7 (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy