I am convinced that anyone who says "the end won't be for everyone" or any variation thereof is retarded.
That goes for each and every one of us who justifies the death and destruction behind this phrase, when we haven't even see any fruits of those deaths yet.
That's not a justification it's a simple statement of fact. The end won't be for everyone.
Get over it. Even the Word of God tells us that much. The idea is people are being warned. Theybare turning away on their own. Not our problem and you can argue with the the guy who brings death over it.
Big issue here is that they chose to name their documentary "Watch the Water", a well-known phrase amongst anons. Snake venom in a vax has nothing to do with water. They deliberately chose that title over any number of better matching titles. That's the red flag for me.
With follow up interviews. Stew Peters chose to name the documentary that was was involved with as "Watch the Water", probably his producers and whoever else involved in its creation. The interviewee has stated such and was not part of the "they" chose to name it watch the water.
Joe Rogan be along shortly with Tarantino, not asking Tarantino about those photos of him licking a kids foot on Epstein's Jet, but mocking "QAnon" cus of a documentary made by the establishment to discredit it.
Won't do anything different. The vax is clearly poison, and we know the elite are devil worshippers. I've learned to recognize their red flags, which they use in another way to lead anons around like a bullfighter does a bull. Seems strange how this idea is the latest thing, when there are so many other angles for us to be watching.
I've never said anything about the water. Has anyone really looked? You'd be surprised. These days nothing can be assumed. Now that you mention it, how much toxins in the water makes a difference to making people sick? I read an article about Lake Mead, which is used as the water source for Las Vegas. The fish in that lake were being affected by women flushing their birth control pills down the toilet. That may sound to some like a hell of a lot of birth control pills. If you look at the volume of Lake Meade and also consider it is a reservoir that has in-flowing fresh water that must make this toxin highly deluded. How much is needed to make a difference? Does all the fish get affected? Do all of us get affected? Or is it a percentage?
Graphene hydroxide (GO) has been found in snow samples. This is a man-made nano particulates that are being sprayed from high above in aircraft. How much GO is needed to affect a certain percentage of the population? What percent of the population is allergic to bee stings? Peanut butter? Oak trees? Poison ivy?
The point I'm making is a bio-toxin can get into the water by aerial spraying and other means. And it doesn't have to sicken everyone. Just a certain percentage. That percentage could be as low as 1% to 2%.
Microplastics are inside all us humans and in basically every single place on Earth. Expeditions to all corners of the Earth have found plastics or microplastics there in both the environment and the organisms. Hard to tell what effects those things may have on the body. Environmentalism isn't all bad, and has some decent principles, like keeping people healthy and contaminant free.
"Environmentalism isn't all bad, and has some decent principles, like keeping people healthy and contaminant free."
I agree as long as the concept are correlated to Nature's Laws. Environmentalism doesn't have to be the fraud it really is. IMHO, most (if not all) environmental groups are completely Co-Oped by the Luciferian Cabal. When I speak of environmentalism, I'm referring to it from an organic level, in which it is understood by and managed not by governments or corporations or non-profit organizations, but by each individual. If this was the well-spring it would feed everything else and the 'corrections' to corporate pollution would be much easier to overcome.
There is a guiding divine Spirit; a Mentality of Spirit; an Air and flow that maintains all life in an immutable fashion. Violations of Nature's Laws always is met with the punishment of revenge. Our Creator has already provided us with everything for us. We just need to learn to use this, instead of depending on government and corporations. Paul Gautschi understands this. It seems everything in life being taught is turning out to be a big LIE. If you have time to watch "Back to Eden" this will give dome insight to what I speak of.
PCR tests are bullshit.. the creator (who conveniently died right before covid) told us not to use them for diagnosis. How is that not commonly known around here?
It's the equivalent of using Bigfoot sightings to justify global warming.
I’ll have to listen to the whole thing again, but from what I gathered, he was focusing on the waste water from the vaxxed and showing the evidence of venom from that. I think he said they COULD be using fresh water sources in select areas to introduce the vax or “snake venom” into those water sources.
I'm not sold on the water supply theory, but much of what he's talked about seems like he is onto something. The venom thing isn't new, and take this quote from June of last year: "Unusual gene insertions within the SARS-CoV-2 viral gene sequence were found that resemble the protein structure and genetic code of a snake venom toxin." It could be that both Remdesivir and the spike protein itself contains DNA from snake venom. My dad was pre-diabetic and was taking injections derived from Gila monster poison to prevent him from becoming type 2 diabetes.
"The attempt to obfuscate all of our research with "muh snake venom."
Who is "all of our research" and "we" that you are referring to? Are you suggesting Dr. Bryan Ardis is wrong?
"It didn't matter if they manufactured it using snake venom (which btw is used in MANY biopharm projects, not just this one.)"
Does it makes sense to use toxins to cure another toxin? What is 'COVID'? What is a 'virus'?
"They're going to look up remdesivir death and Google will put this stupid bullshit front and center along with 16 articles about it being deboonked and us being idiots for falling for "snake oil."
Antidotes are not toxins. An analogy is if there is a strong acid and the 'antidote' of a strong base, that renders it to a neutral and harmless.
"Further to this point, we literally use mold to kill bacteria in our bodies."
Bacteria is Nature's way of biodegrading 'poisons'. To understand this is the 'key' to the kingdom. It is always the method that determines the outcome. To consider the complete environmental effects rather than limit oneself to a reductionist approach is crucial in understanding health.
The narrative really determines how one understands things. Is Koch's Postulate being followed when, for example, a 'virus' has never been isolated in all the history of Virology. This fact alone should make us question other 'settled' science like -- Does Germs (not worms or parasites) or bacteria cause disease?
Science is a continuum; a process of current understanding and is never really 'settled'. So, is it a 'guilt' by association scenario or are they merely associated with the real causes? The Correlation/Causation Fallacy is where two events occurring together are taken to establish a cause-and-effect relationship. This however is not the scientific method. Could the presence of the bacteria be for degrading the toxins that are present as a result of 'something' from the environment? Could the bacteria be Nature's cleanup crew for what is already diseased or dead?
We know in Nature bacteria is used to biodegrade what is dead or diseased in the environment. Why would we be any different from anything else in Nature? A poisoned dead pond will produce algae growth. The algae is not good for you and may produce its own toxins, but it exists in Nature to biodegrade the toxins in the pond. It is the poisoned pond that was the cause of the dead pond, not the algae that is biodegrading the toxins in the pond. We see this understanding at work in municipal waste systems.
The entire problem with bacteriology and Virology is they fail to follow the scientific method. More precisely, they fail to follow Koch's postulates. What has occurred is their science is a one based on an 'assumption', but not fact.
I'm not disagreeing with you. I discern things for myself and I have been very keen to group think. Attempted Group think is easy to spot when people use words like "we" and "all of our research".
My question is who is "we"?
Then I asked is Dr. Bryan Ardis wrong? Again, does it makes sense to use toxins to cure another toxin? What is 'COVID'? What is a 'virus'?
Your response saying -- "We've known about snake venom and medicine for centuries." didn't really answer my question above. What is 'COVID'? What is a 'virus'? Please answer this.
According to that doctor corona is genetic venom. A virus must be parasitical since HCQ and Ivermectin knock it out but also deals with venom.
Early covid all the deaths had one thing in common, the people all had flu shots. They could have introduced the venom that way.
Im glad someone else caught on to what was being theorized with the venom in water inference. All of the sudden there are these activist style posters about "venom in water is psyop nonsense DS infiltration etc. etc. My guess is everyone pushing the prove to me this bullshit water theory didnt even watch any of the interviews all the way. Seems more they read the headline of the Stew Peters movie and jumped to immediate conclusions. In not one instance did I see Dr. Ardis state as the main point that this snake venom is in the water and killing people. In fact it clearly looked as in it very well could be present in some water systems as a means for pushed positive results with the PCR test. All the while the entire purpose of any of those interviews was, snake venom as the driving factor for various aspects of "Covid 19".
I think there are a lot of people on here who are not true patriots. They are trying to manipulate and confuse us. I read every comment with a humongous grain of salt.
Yes and anons have thwarted, for the most part, this misdirection op, and successfully prevented it from being perma-seeded into our networks. Good job everyone!
Same ole gong being beat here by the same 5 or so usernames. What is your motivation here? All I see is the same talking point being regurgitated. Venom in water is psyop bullshit etc etc. Did you even review documents are watch any of the interviews? If you did how did you entirely miss that the focus of most of the information was directed at venom of several types of snakes was being speculated as used as a basis for various "Covid 19" aspects. What is suspect here is the group think perpetuation of one cherry picked talking point on the public water systems. Not once was it stated if present it is killing everyone or kills pets or whatever other repeated assumptions yall keep pushing. It was theorized if present in the water, hence the CDC as documented doing waste water testing for "Covid"----why? and then fortuitously predicting "outbreaks" in those regions based on their testing early on in the "scamdemic". Additionally that PCR testing predating the scamdemic was developed for techniques to detect snake venom, therefore theorized if venom was present in water system could very well be a contributor to large blocks of positive "Covid" PCR tests. Nothing has been thwarted that I have seen regardless of the group think projection provided here.
Good job putting the regurgitators at task. I noticed they dont respond to any of your incipient points either. If anyone is, the lock step narrative being pushed by these 5 or so posters on this water theory is objective misdirection. Their motivation to perpetuate the same thing over and over on multiple threads for like 7 days now is very suspect to me.
Kinda like loose change doc wound up being taken apart for the few errors, and then the focus is on the errors. Then for a time any discussion of 911 gets pushed to loose change and debunked on those errors over the context.
Wouldn't be surprised to find out that Stew Peter's is controlled opposition. Probably brought in to reel in the conservatives that couldn't get on board with Alex Jones.
I agree 100%. That was one of the first things I thought when I saw that title. Grifters. And stupid idiots on here fell for it. Stew peters is disingenuous,
Boy have I got some stuff to share on this. Long but possibly interesting.
On 4/11, Stew Peters released Watch the Water.
Prior to 4/11, back when Stew was insinuating our water was unsafe but wouldn't elaborate, Phil Godlewski told everyone that he had no intel about the water and that it was safe when asked about it.
On 4/12, Phil Godlewski went live and streamed most of the Watch the Waters video, hyping up Stew Peters, commending the interview, fake crying, etc. He took a break in the middle to lament that he got too caught up in his various businesses (Phil's Silver, a part of 7k Metals, Starve the Beast, and more) to take the time to properly decode the watch the water drop.
Better yet, he revealed that he was, in fact, the one that posted that drop under the Q tripcode/account. He claims he didn't know what it meant, but that he posted it on someone else's orders.
He immediately turned on the white hats and what he's dubbed "the three star group". The white hats because they weren't clear enough with the drop, and how could they allow this to happen? The three star group because they were immediately calling out the interview as being bullshit.
(By the way, the very next day after his croc tears he was hawking gold plated Jesus coins on his announcements page).
He then promised a solution to save us all from the water.
On 4/13, Phil went live again, touting "You don't want to miss this one." He started shilling a water filter. Not just any ol' water filter, but one that could specifically protect you from snake venom in the water.
The website, watchthewater.world, was registered through GoDaddy.com on 4/13. He and another "Truther", ToddFather, teamed up on this venture with the water filter company Seychelle.
He spent the whole live and the next live, a Q & A, saying that ONLY THIS Seychelle filter could protect you against snake venom. He said you should even be filtering your well water, and no other means of filtering would protect you. He really hammered in the fear factor. He promised that "5-10%" of the proceeds would go to veterans but gave no details on which charity he was going through.
His fanbase turned on him bigly, so Phil, kind hearted soul that he is, launched a Give Send Go campaign so that his followers could donate money to be put towards his filters to be given to his followers that couldn't afford them. As of today, 4/18, he's made at least $40,000 in donations, and claims he made $500k in the first 24 hours and nearly $1m within the first 48 hours.
Today on his Telegram announcements channel he attempted to reach out to SQvage DQwg for recommendations/information about veteran charities. SQvage basically said "Nuh uh, don't come near me." and rejected him.
For a bit more fun...
If you go to Seychelle, you'll see they have a disclaimer stating that they have NO EVIDENCE/TESTS that can confirm whether the filter actually filters out snake venom. Yet Phil swore up and down that this was the only filter that could.
Also, months ago Phil signed up to Twitch to host his streams. His fans rightfully questioned him on this, asking why he's supporting a cabal-owned company. He claimed that he brokered a deal with Twitch that gave him 100% of the money generated by his streams, and it was okay because it was now white hat controlled anyways.
Last month, Phil was banned from Twitch. Which is weird, considering it's white hat controlled, right?
Today, someone in his Telegram chat room said that they bought an identical Seychelle filter off of Amazon for $30 cheaper.
Phil responded "Thanks for supporting a cabal owned company instead of one run by a patriot. Appreciate that."
I questioned him on this, and he refused to reply.
Also, Phil insinuates that he controls @q on TS, is a part of the original Q team, wrote many of the q drops, and that he knew all along that Covid was not a virus, but a poison. But he didn't know how it was delivered.
I know everyone here already doubted Phil so this won't come as a shock, but I believe it gives further evidence to the theory that this was all a gigantic scam. Phil and Stew Peters used the same tactics that MSM used with Covid to instill fear and make sales. Phil tripled down with the Give Send Go and yet unproven claims that he'd be donating "5-10%" of the proceeds to veterans - he didn't even have a charity lined up in advance, but made damn sure he got that website done immediately. He promised a second website where people could apply for free filters which still hasn't been made.
I can't speak on Ardis' claims. But I believe that Phil, Stew Peters, and ToddFather took advantage of the situation at best and created it at worst.
Aaaaannnnd right on queue, the attacks on Stew Peters begins. Now all of the sudden, he's a shill, grfter, troll, etc.
Then the pile on begins. How about err on the side of caution or bring relevent discussion to vet the subject matter. This thread even went as deep as injecting Alex Jones as some part of a purposeful psyop againt truth seekers.
I also get that Stew Peter shoe should've had a better title to the interview/ documentary. I also get that Ardis' approach isn't the best (almost cringy, comedic at times), but can the discussion focus on the actual facts and information presented?
Look at the history of our government with exerimenting on the public. Who profited from COVID, what happened to the flu and cold? Why was the jab evolved into compulsion?
Stew fights to stop jabbing kids, constantly talks about Chritianity and the power of God. Where and when in the hell has he shown any fight to discredit this movement to take our country back. Bring the fvcking sauce or shut the fvck up.
You can't imply that they're more trustworthy than we think when the initial interview implied heavily that the snake venom is in your drinking water and now Ardis is saying it's in the sewer water.
Stew Peters is always looking to investigate new perspectives so I respect him for that. But when it comes to snake venom in water supply it is actually very easy to verify if this story checks out.
The vials must follow chain of custody protocol on the way to an independent lab and make sure not to introduce too much oxygen when collecting the vials.
My opinion on this subject has been clear and that snake venom is going to break down quickly outside of certain parameters.
I expect this from the liars in the media that have sold their souls to evil. We all do.
That being said, Dr. Ardis did the truth movement zero favors by making some of his assertions in the "Watch the Water" documentary. While some of the information/data in that documentary was excellent, his statements about snake venom in the tap water were nothing more than reckless supposition.
The quickest way to lose an argument is to overstate your case. Ardis handed our enemy a brand new crate of ammo with his foolish statements.
I'd agree that the water supply as a disease vector is a very stretchy claim because of the evidence and logic used to arrive at that conclusion. In fact I care very little for that idea, especially as it turns out that Stew Peters did no one any favours by hyping the water. How Peters presented the information was just like missing the point.
On the other hand, I think the snake venom hypothesis has some significant merit worth investigating. The papers, symptoms, evidence, and reasoning presented by Dr Ardin shows a much better correlation between venom and virus, and anti-venom and treatment, than with poisoning and testing.
One incorrect hypothesis should not automatically disqualify the other hypothesis unless they are dependent on each other, and I fail to see how venom as a disease component must depend on whether or not if the water is poisoned, or vice versa.
EDIT: I should clarify that my very best idea about what Covid is what Dr Richard Fleming has to say about the disease. Whether Dr Ardin is right or not about the snake venom being involved, I am firm about Dr Fleming having the best explanation about how covid behaves and how it is a bioweapon.
What Dr Ardin's hypothesis does is it presents a new idea that could deepen and augment my understanding about the disease. If it's wrong, then I can still fall back on Dr Fleming's idea as being the best way to explain the disease.
So does anyone have any info on what the significance of the water in the backgrounds of the 2 NK photos is and the meaning of them sitting on the two chairs?
Thank you. Yes, the water behind the Kim Jong-Un looks a lot calmer and like a new day is dawning. And he is standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the other men.
I do t think it's a discrediting chill out. At this point the water thing was handled bybArdis. We understand what he was saying.
The stew Peter's producers in my opinion were lazy amd looking for a shock title to pull you in. It worked. Don't throw the it all over because a little taint.
....his job is to make us look stupid. Also why I dont trust Brent75.
I think he was just trying to get everyone to state their take on it, rather than promoting it as true. Could be mistaken but that's the vibe I got
His response to my comment was manipulative....I know it when I see it. He will need to work hard to recover any respect or trust from me.
link to comment?
Don't know how.....but I said " I hate to be this guy....but I'm not buying it" and he said "The End Won’t Be For Everyone."
I am convinced that anyone who says "the end won't be for everyone" or any variation thereof is retarded.
That goes for each and every one of us who justifies the death and destruction behind this phrase, when we haven't even see any fruits of those deaths yet.
That's not a justification it's a simple statement of fact. The end won't be for everyone.
Get over it. Even the Word of God tells us that much. The idea is people are being warned. Theybare turning away on their own. Not our problem and you can argue with the the guy who brings death over it.
If you can hand wave away all the bad that would be done if "white hats are in control", then you are stupid.
And that's "a simple statement of fact".
To be in control means you are then responsible for that loss of life.
There's a 'permalink' under every comment, just copy n paste that.
If that's the case it sucks because he does have a lot of important, truthful Covid/Vax content.
Big issue here is that they chose to name their documentary "Watch the Water", a well-known phrase amongst anons. Snake venom in a vax has nothing to do with water. They deliberately chose that title over any number of better matching titles. That's the red flag for me.
With follow up interviews. Stew Peters chose to name the documentary that was was involved with as "Watch the Water", probably his producers and whoever else involved in its creation. The interviewee has stated such and was not part of the "they" chose to name it watch the water.
So we need to dig into these producers, eh?
Yep that was the final nail in the coffin for me with Stew. I never really trusted him but now i won't bother watching his stuff.
Joe Rogan be along shortly with Tarantino, not asking Tarantino about those photos of him licking a kids foot on Epstein's Jet, but mocking "QAnon" cus of a documentary made by the establishment to discredit it.
And what will you do when you find out venom is the base?
Ditch the water thing it's the distraction.
Won't do anything different. The vax is clearly poison, and we know the elite are devil worshippers. I've learned to recognize their red flags, which they use in another way to lead anons around like a bullfighter does a bull. Seems strange how this idea is the latest thing, when there are so many other angles for us to be watching.
Be more specific on how Dr. Bryan Ardis is "spreading a false narrative". What are you disagreeing with?
I've never said anything about the water. Has anyone really looked? You'd be surprised. These days nothing can be assumed. Now that you mention it, how much toxins in the water makes a difference to making people sick? I read an article about Lake Mead, which is used as the water source for Las Vegas. The fish in that lake were being affected by women flushing their birth control pills down the toilet. That may sound to some like a hell of a lot of birth control pills. If you look at the volume of Lake Meade and also consider it is a reservoir that has in-flowing fresh water that must make this toxin highly deluded. How much is needed to make a difference? Does all the fish get affected? Do all of us get affected? Or is it a percentage?
Graphene hydroxide (GO) has been found in snow samples. This is a man-made nano particulates that are being sprayed from high above in aircraft. How much GO is needed to affect a certain percentage of the population? What percent of the population is allergic to bee stings? Peanut butter? Oak trees? Poison ivy?
The point I'm making is a bio-toxin can get into the water by aerial spraying and other means. And it doesn't have to sicken everyone. Just a certain percentage. That percentage could be as low as 1% to 2%.
Microplastics are inside all us humans and in basically every single place on Earth. Expeditions to all corners of the Earth have found plastics or microplastics there in both the environment and the organisms. Hard to tell what effects those things may have on the body. Environmentalism isn't all bad, and has some decent principles, like keeping people healthy and contaminant free.
I agree as long as the concept are correlated to Nature's Laws. Environmentalism doesn't have to be the fraud it really is. IMHO, most (if not all) environmental groups are completely Co-Oped by the Luciferian Cabal. When I speak of environmentalism, I'm referring to it from an organic level, in which it is understood by and managed not by governments or corporations or non-profit organizations, but by each individual. If this was the well-spring it would feed everything else and the 'corrections' to corporate pollution would be much easier to overcome.
There is a guiding divine Spirit; a Mentality of Spirit; an Air and flow that maintains all life in an immutable fashion. Violations of Nature's Laws always is met with the punishment of revenge. Our Creator has already provided us with everything for us. We just need to learn to use this, instead of depending on government and corporations. Paul Gautschi understands this. It seems everything in life being taught is turning out to be a big LIE. If you have time to watch "Back to Eden" this will give dome insight to what I speak of.
PCR tests are bullshit.. the creator (who conveniently died right before covid) told us not to use them for diagnosis. How is that not commonly known around here?
It's the equivalent of using Bigfoot sightings to justify global warming.
I’ll have to listen to the whole thing again, but from what I gathered, he was focusing on the waste water from the vaxxed and showing the evidence of venom from that. I think he said they COULD be using fresh water sources in select areas to introduce the vax or “snake venom” into those water sources.
I'm not sold on the water supply theory, but much of what he's talked about seems like he is onto something. The venom thing isn't new, and take this quote from June of last year: "Unusual gene insertions within the SARS-CoV-2 viral gene sequence were found that resemble the protein structure and genetic code of a snake venom toxin." It could be that both Remdesivir and the spike protein itself contains DNA from snake venom. My dad was pre-diabetic and was taking injections derived from Gila monster poison to prevent him from becoming type 2 diabetes.
Source: https://transcendingsquare.com/2021/06/18/snake-venom-toxin-in-the-spike-protein/
Who is "all of our research" and "we" that you are referring to? Are you suggesting Dr. Bryan Ardis is wrong?
Does it makes sense to use toxins to cure another toxin? What is 'COVID'? What is a 'virus'?
What is Remdesivir? What is its history?
Do you not know what antidotes are made from?
Further to this point, we literally use mold to kill bacteria in our bodies.
Antidotes are not toxins. An analogy is if there is a strong acid and the 'antidote' of a strong base, that renders it to a neutral and harmless.
Bacteria is Nature's way of biodegrading 'poisons'. To understand this is the 'key' to the kingdom. It is always the method that determines the outcome. To consider the complete environmental effects rather than limit oneself to a reductionist approach is crucial in understanding health.
The narrative really determines how one understands things. Is Koch's Postulate being followed when, for example, a 'virus' has never been isolated in all the history of Virology. This fact alone should make us question other 'settled' science like -- Does Germs (not worms or parasites) or bacteria cause disease?
Science is a continuum; a process of current understanding and is never really 'settled'. So, is it a 'guilt' by association scenario or are they merely associated with the real causes? The Correlation/Causation Fallacy is where two events occurring together are taken to establish a cause-and-effect relationship. This however is not the scientific method. Could the presence of the bacteria be for degrading the toxins that are present as a result of 'something' from the environment? Could the bacteria be Nature's cleanup crew for what is already diseased or dead?
We know in Nature bacteria is used to biodegrade what is dead or diseased in the environment. Why would we be any different from anything else in Nature? A poisoned dead pond will produce algae growth. The algae is not good for you and may produce its own toxins, but it exists in Nature to biodegrade the toxins in the pond. It is the poisoned pond that was the cause of the dead pond, not the algae that is biodegrading the toxins in the pond. We see this understanding at work in municipal waste systems.
The entire problem with bacteriology and Virology is they fail to follow the scientific method. More precisely, they fail to follow Koch's postulates. What has occurred is their science is a one based on an 'assumption', but not fact.
Have you read this? https://www.abc15.com/news/coronavirus/university-of-arizona-researchers-find-link-between-covid-deaths-and-snake-venom
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/15/snakes-spike-protein-injections-things-to-consider/
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-04-13-venomtech-company-announces-massive-library-of-snake-venom-peptides-for-pharmaceutical-deployment.html
https://www.cell.com/biophysj/fulltext/S0006-3495(21)00146-6#relatedArticles
I'm not disagreeing with you. I discern things for myself and I have been very keen to group think. Attempted Group think is easy to spot when people use words like "we" and "all of our research".
My question is who is "we"?
Then I asked is Dr. Bryan Ardis wrong? Again, does it makes sense to use toxins to cure another toxin? What is 'COVID'? What is a 'virus'?
Your response saying -- "We've known about snake venom and medicine for centuries." didn't really answer my question above. What is 'COVID'? What is a 'virus'? Please answer this.
According to that doctor corona is genetic venom. A virus must be parasitical since HCQ and Ivermectin knock it out but also deals with venom. Early covid all the deaths had one thing in common, the people all had flu shots. They could have introduced the venom that way.
Im glad someone else caught on to what was being theorized with the venom in water inference. All of the sudden there are these activist style posters about "venom in water is psyop nonsense DS infiltration etc. etc. My guess is everyone pushing the prove to me this bullshit water theory didnt even watch any of the interviews all the way. Seems more they read the headline of the Stew Peters movie and jumped to immediate conclusions. In not one instance did I see Dr. Ardis state as the main point that this snake venom is in the water and killing people. In fact it clearly looked as in it very well could be present in some water systems as a means for pushed positive results with the PCR test. All the while the entire purpose of any of those interviews was, snake venom as the driving factor for various aspects of "Covid 19".
I think there are a lot of people on here who are not true patriots. They are trying to manipulate and confuse us. I read every comment with a humongous grain of salt.
Good graphic.
Yes and anons have thwarted, for the most part, this misdirection op, and successfully prevented it from being perma-seeded into our networks. Good job everyone!
Same ole gong being beat here by the same 5 or so usernames. What is your motivation here? All I see is the same talking point being regurgitated. Venom in water is psyop bullshit etc etc. Did you even review documents are watch any of the interviews? If you did how did you entirely miss that the focus of most of the information was directed at venom of several types of snakes was being speculated as used as a basis for various "Covid 19" aspects. What is suspect here is the group think perpetuation of one cherry picked talking point on the public water systems. Not once was it stated if present it is killing everyone or kills pets or whatever other repeated assumptions yall keep pushing. It was theorized if present in the water, hence the CDC as documented doing waste water testing for "Covid"----why? and then fortuitously predicting "outbreaks" in those regions based on their testing early on in the "scamdemic". Additionally that PCR testing predating the scamdemic was developed for techniques to detect snake venom, therefore theorized if venom was present in water system could very well be a contributor to large blocks of positive "Covid" PCR tests. Nothing has been thwarted that I have seen regardless of the group think projection provided here.
I heard about this outside of the .wins community way before I saw it here. Which I found very odd.
For some reason it spread through the normies like wildfire.
I also immediately had my doubts about several points in the video.
I wont dismiss it entirely, but am far from believing the whole thing.
Good job putting the regurgitators at task. I noticed they dont respond to any of your incipient points either. If anyone is, the lock step narrative being pushed by these 5 or so posters on this water theory is objective misdirection. Their motivation to perpetuate the same thing over and over on multiple threads for like 7 days now is very suspect to me.
I'm strongly questioning if this is tied to drop 1328.
Thanks for a new angle on what I suspected.
Kinda like loose change doc wound up being taken apart for the few errors, and then the focus is on the errors. Then for a time any discussion of 911 gets pushed to loose change and debunked on those errors over the context.
Side note my eldery mother now knows all news is complete bullshit. She still has TDS. But we are moving in the right direction.
Wouldn't be surprised to find out that Stew Peter's is controlled opposition. Probably brought in to reel in the conservatives that couldn't get on board with Alex Jones.
I agree 100%. That was one of the first things I thought when I saw that title. Grifters. And stupid idiots on here fell for it. Stew peters is disingenuous,
Boy have I got some stuff to share on this. Long but possibly interesting.
On 4/11, Stew Peters released Watch the Water. Prior to 4/11, back when Stew was insinuating our water was unsafe but wouldn't elaborate, Phil Godlewski told everyone that he had no intel about the water and that it was safe when asked about it.
On 4/12, Phil Godlewski went live and streamed most of the Watch the Waters video, hyping up Stew Peters, commending the interview, fake crying, etc. He took a break in the middle to lament that he got too caught up in his various businesses (Phil's Silver, a part of 7k Metals, Starve the Beast, and more) to take the time to properly decode the watch the water drop.
Better yet, he revealed that he was, in fact, the one that posted that drop under the Q tripcode/account. He claims he didn't know what it meant, but that he posted it on someone else's orders.
He immediately turned on the white hats and what he's dubbed "the three star group". The white hats because they weren't clear enough with the drop, and how could they allow this to happen? The three star group because they were immediately calling out the interview as being bullshit.
(By the way, the very next day after his croc tears he was hawking gold plated Jesus coins on his announcements page).
He then promised a solution to save us all from the water.
On 4/13, Phil went live again, touting "You don't want to miss this one." He started shilling a water filter. Not just any ol' water filter, but one that could specifically protect you from snake venom in the water.
The website, watchthewater.world, was registered through GoDaddy.com on 4/13. He and another "Truther", ToddFather, teamed up on this venture with the water filter company Seychelle.
He spent the whole live and the next live, a Q & A, saying that ONLY THIS Seychelle filter could protect you against snake venom. He said you should even be filtering your well water, and no other means of filtering would protect you. He really hammered in the fear factor. He promised that "5-10%" of the proceeds would go to veterans but gave no details on which charity he was going through.
His fanbase turned on him bigly, so Phil, kind hearted soul that he is, launched a Give Send Go campaign so that his followers could donate money to be put towards his filters to be given to his followers that couldn't afford them. As of today, 4/18, he's made at least $40,000 in donations, and claims he made $500k in the first 24 hours and nearly $1m within the first 48 hours.
Today on his Telegram announcements channel he attempted to reach out to SQvage DQwg for recommendations/information about veteran charities. SQvage basically said "Nuh uh, don't come near me." and rejected him.
For a bit more fun...
If you go to Seychelle, you'll see they have a disclaimer stating that they have NO EVIDENCE/TESTS that can confirm whether the filter actually filters out snake venom. Yet Phil swore up and down that this was the only filter that could.
Also, months ago Phil signed up to Twitch to host his streams. His fans rightfully questioned him on this, asking why he's supporting a cabal-owned company. He claimed that he brokered a deal with Twitch that gave him 100% of the money generated by his streams, and it was okay because it was now white hat controlled anyways.
Last month, Phil was banned from Twitch. Which is weird, considering it's white hat controlled, right?
Today, someone in his Telegram chat room said that they bought an identical Seychelle filter off of Amazon for $30 cheaper.
Phil responded "Thanks for supporting a cabal owned company instead of one run by a patriot. Appreciate that."
I questioned him on this, and he refused to reply.
Also, Phil insinuates that he controls @q on TS, is a part of the original Q team, wrote many of the q drops, and that he knew all along that Covid was not a virus, but a poison. But he didn't know how it was delivered.
I know everyone here already doubted Phil so this won't come as a shock, but I believe it gives further evidence to the theory that this was all a gigantic scam. Phil and Stew Peters used the same tactics that MSM used with Covid to instill fear and make sales. Phil tripled down with the Give Send Go and yet unproven claims that he'd be donating "5-10%" of the proceeds to veterans - he didn't even have a charity lined up in advance, but made damn sure he got that website done immediately. He promised a second website where people could apply for free filters which still hasn't been made.
I can't speak on Ardis' claims. But I believe that Phil, Stew Peters, and ToddFather took advantage of the situation at best and created it at worst.
Now go research the documents presented and tell me how the author is a shill. Don't focus on the messenger.
thanks for the effort to expose this fuk........
I see we have at least one fan of Phil here....lol
Aaaaannnnd right on queue, the attacks on Stew Peters begins. Now all of the sudden, he's a shill, grfter, troll, etc.
Then the pile on begins. How about err on the side of caution or bring relevent discussion to vet the subject matter. This thread even went as deep as injecting Alex Jones as some part of a purposeful psyop againt truth seekers.
I also get that Stew Peter shoe should've had a better title to the interview/ documentary. I also get that Ardis' approach isn't the best (almost cringy, comedic at times), but can the discussion focus on the actual facts and information presented?
Look at the history of our government with exerimenting on the public. Who profited from COVID, what happened to the flu and cold? Why was the jab evolved into compulsion?
Stew fights to stop jabbing kids, constantly talks about Chritianity and the power of God. Where and when in the hell has he shown any fight to discredit this movement to take our country back. Bring the fvcking sauce or shut the fvck up.
You can't imply that they're more trustworthy than we think when the initial interview implied heavily that the snake venom is in your drinking water and now Ardis is saying it's in the sewer water.
The two statements mean vastly different things.
So, no one is allowed to make mistakes? The title is a mistake and i admitted that. So now who do you suggest we ONLY listen to. Agent healmehealme.
Stew Peters is always looking to investigate new perspectives so I respect him for that. But when it comes to snake venom in water supply it is actually very easy to verify if this story checks out.
The vials must follow chain of custody protocol on the way to an independent lab and make sure not to introduce too much oxygen when collecting the vials.
My opinion on this subject has been clear and that snake venom is going to break down quickly outside of certain parameters.
I expect this from the liars in the media that have sold their souls to evil. We all do.
That being said, Dr. Ardis did the truth movement zero favors by making some of his assertions in the "Watch the Water" documentary. While some of the information/data in that documentary was excellent, his statements about snake venom in the tap water were nothing more than reckless supposition.
The quickest way to lose an argument is to overstate your case. Ardis handed our enemy a brand new crate of ammo with his foolish statements.
The flat earthers here aren't intelligent enough to see through that lie... it's not surprising they fall for this "Watch the water" nonsense as well.
Go away mike
or Stew can just be wrong. Take your meds LOL
I'd agree that the water supply as a disease vector is a very stretchy claim because of the evidence and logic used to arrive at that conclusion. In fact I care very little for that idea, especially as it turns out that Stew Peters did no one any favours by hyping the water. How Peters presented the information was just like missing the point.
On the other hand, I think the snake venom hypothesis has some significant merit worth investigating. The papers, symptoms, evidence, and reasoning presented by Dr Ardin shows a much better correlation between venom and virus, and anti-venom and treatment, than with poisoning and testing.
One incorrect hypothesis should not automatically disqualify the other hypothesis unless they are dependent on each other, and I fail to see how venom as a disease component must depend on whether or not if the water is poisoned, or vice versa.
EDIT: I should clarify that my very best idea about what Covid is what Dr Richard Fleming has to say about the disease. Whether Dr Ardin is right or not about the snake venom being involved, I am firm about Dr Fleming having the best explanation about how covid behaves and how it is a bioweapon.
What Dr Ardin's hypothesis does is it presents a new idea that could deepen and augment my understanding about the disease. If it's wrong, then I can still fall back on Dr Fleming's idea as being the best way to explain the disease.
Weird how this website promotes Stew Peters and Juan O Sullivan and pin their posts up promptly.
So does anyone have any info on what the significance of the water in the backgrounds of the 2 NK photos is and the meaning of them sitting on the two chairs?
Thank you. Yes, the water behind the Kim Jong-Un looks a lot calmer and like a new day is dawning. And he is standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the other men.
YEP, Juan O Sulivan, Stew Peters, Charlie Ward, Alex Jones etc.... they're all the same bullshit artists.
Go to the Jordan Sather's thread and look at all the shills and downvotes on the guy. Then you know they hate Sather because he is calling them out.
Sure but Sather isn't trustworthy either. Unless I'm out of the loop or misunderstanding the drop.
Two wrongs (if sather is trash paytriot which he isn't) does not make a right.
These Charlie wards, Alex Jones etc pieces of shits always have "connections" in "high places" giving info from "anons". Sather doesn't have.
Brings back memories of me and my girl at the point watching submarine races.
I do t think it's a discrediting chill out. At this point the water thing was handled bybArdis. We understand what he was saying.
The stew Peter's producers in my opinion were lazy amd looking for a shock title to pull you in. It worked. Don't throw the it all over because a little taint.
“Stew”? Username checks out …
ThanQ!
:)
Worth the time, dig it