You're welcome. I'm not going to get into it, but it loses focus even more when users complain about it instead of doing something to fix it.
The shills jump in and parrot comments like these and pull the board down even further. This makes our jobs as mods harder.
All I did today was take a link from Qalerts and posted it to start a discussion, any user could've done this at any time, and messaged the mods to sticky it.
Nothing against you personally, but I'm absolutely fed up with comments like these.
Sorry you also might not know that today in the UK a court approved the extradition to the USA of JA. IT's up to the Home Sec Priti Pratel, who will most likely let it go ahead. Seth Rich is linked to JA and Wikileaks. Seth Rich was the DNC staffer who was murdered in suspicious circumstances and many believe he had copied files from the DNC server onto a thumb drive, the server was never hacked (we know this because of the DL speed of the file transfer was too fast for it to be over the internet) Wikileaks have this info, ie JA.
Another vector researchers could consider in regards to dates is using the Hebrew calendar, as well. Q emphasized the importance of the clock for context. The elites since the Sumerians, have used the lunisolar calendar to track time and rule over society. The Gregorian calendar is important but I don't believe it is the only calendar, or clock, we should be using to make sense of Q.
Some Q sites easily convert to the Hebrew calendar so it's not too hard to research in this format but it can get complicated as it obviously does not sync up with the Gregorian. The Hebrew calendar was adopted by the Jews during the Babylonian exile and is therefore very similar to the Babylonian calendar which is based off the Sumerian calendar. I did find what I believe to be critical information when using the Hebrew calendar as another factor for guidance. I explain it more in the one post in my history. There's a lot to it but I'm fairly certain it's of critical importance.
Norman (via CHAOS) sent several messages to the mods
requesting clarification about his banning. He got no response
and remains unable to make comments.
I didn't see any of them, so it must have been before I was a mod. He's not banned, and it's very easy to make the statement that he can't comment without showing any proof.
Why doesn't Norman take a screen recording of him not being able to make comments and send it to the mod team? Whether its from you or CHAOS, it doesn't matter.
About that link... you're the mod... do your job.
That's not something that I can dig up easily, if at all, so I would assume that you would have that data in question.
I'll tell you one thing though, I'm not going to take orders from someone who makes false accusations or vague threats.
I'm not going to ban you, but I am very emotionally checked out with finding a solution to your problem due to the disrespect of your comments. If Norman gives a shit, he can either message the modteam, or have you or CHAOS message the modteam, with a screen recording showing his username, and his inability to post or comment.
Right now, his account doesn't show having any limits on my side.
If he really wanted to come back, he could easily make a new account and name it "Norman_F_Dixon2" or "Norman_D" or any combination, and we'll know its him by the depth and content of his posts. I'm not sure why he doesn't do this. Again, his IP is not banned.
It should be noted that TDU didn't single you out, or accuse YOU directly for any of the questionable actions taken against NFD. TDU is just trying to figure out what happened and why. These are valid inquiries. But I do also agree with the confusion here regarding NFD. As v8power has also pointed out, according to the public mod logs, NFD is not banned. Last time I received a PM reply from NFD was right around when the initial ban occurred, and that PM has since been deleted. It went something along the lines of "it's not worth the effort dealing with these idiots" (my paraphrase).I agree that it seems odd that if NFD is not banned, he'd be unable to post. It would be great to get to the bottom of all this.
While you're looking into questionable ban issues, can you look into the ban history for ExpertBread / NotExpertBread? There were shenanigans with this standup, brilliant community member before the issues with Norman. Several of us inquired through posts/comments, though much of those seem to have since been deleted. I had a PM reply from a mod that has also since been deleted, in which I was told that it couldn't be figured out which mod banned Bread, and yet later on it was admitted plainly that said mod did know which mod banned Bread ("one of our most active mods") but then when he asked this banning mod WHY he banned Bread, he claimed that he "didn't remember"... if I remember correctly, this might have all happened before there were any public mod logs. If you click on his account, it now says "user deleted their account.". That's weird. ExpertBread was banned. Mod confirmed that. So he deleted his own account, or was it deleted because of his ban? It appears that the account NotExpertBread wasn't deleted, although all of the comments are deleted. The posts are still visible though. Interestingly, I noticed that all of Mitch's comments have been deleted, but like NotExpertBread, the posts are still visible.
Appreciate any research and insights into these strange happenings that you might be able to provide.
How are you certain that TDU is NFD? Just because these accounts exhibit similar posting styles? Do the accounts share the same IP? What other hard evidence is there to prove the accounts are the same person? What do you think about CHAOS_ACTUAL or the other dozen accounts associated with TDU and NFD? What do you make of the covfefe thread in which these associated accounts all posted? Do they all belong to the same user? Are these just aliases? Dummy accounts to reactivate in case one is banned? But what do you make of the various threads where these accounts were posting comments seemingly in conversation with each other? You think that one person really went through the trouble to do that to make it look like they were all different unique users? Or is it possible, rather more likely, that TDU is not NFD, that these accounts are all separate users, but are part of a coordinated group? Maybe just a bunch of friends? Seems like there are other reasonable conclusions to make about said account(s) aside from TDU=NFD... not saying that's not true, could be... but is there more conclusive evidence that we're not privy to?
As to ExpertBread, can you address my questions about that situation? Do you also think that Bread was another alias of an "entity" you seem to think is TDU/NFD et al?
I'm not going to disclose our back end. But you can plainly see when the accounts were created and TDU's post count jumped significantly after NFD's ban. TDU was essentially inactive before that time. Why would someone that inactive suddenly be concerned with NFD? Why are you so concerned?
I know nothing of expertbread.
Something that I always found odd was that on the public record of mod logs, it always just says "a moderator ____" but it won't reveal which mod did what. Why is that? Is there a reason why the public can't know which mod did what? Is there no functionality on the mod end that tells them which mods did what? A mod once said he couldn't find out who banned ExpertBread, and yet then he stated that he asked the banning mod ("our most active mod") why he banned Bread, and the answer was "herp derp i can't remember", which reveals two things: the aforementioned mod certainly could find out which mod did the banning, and lied about not knowing, and apparently mods could just ban without giving a reason, or the banning mod was lying about "not remembering" why... of course all of this could just have been made up to further confuse and deter questions being asked... who knows? We certainly don't know. Can't know. The site has very little transparency when it comes to the actions of mods...
I think these are all fair questions... Who owns the site? Who pays the bills? Who has ultimate power over the mods? Why is there little transparency about any of this? I've always found it interesting that Facebook will not let you post or message links to GAW using that platform. They claim the website is a violation of their user rules because of "violence" and other bullshit. It's as if "people" don't want this place to be advertised in the mainstream, don't want traffic here... who doesn't want the visibility and why?
This is all just very... mysterious... to say the least.
I take offense to this, because I work hard to maintain this site in my spare time without pay, contract, or any form of compensation whatsoever.
I got the mod position by asking to help. I was a normal user just like everyone else. I didn't know any insiders or anything like that.
You can fuck off with that shit.
Norman is not banned, and he can post anytime. I dug into this because you and his other friends asked in the comments. Again, I did this on my spare time to answer a question for fellow users and I really don't appreciate your accusations.
No mod has ever answered the question why the comment that got him banned was put back into the thread it was deleted?
Send me a link to the thread and point out which comment.
who is behind the .win platform? Who pays the bills?
Great questions. I dont know the answer to them.
But I do know one thing, you dont spit in someone's eye and ask for their help. Watch your tongue.
So new mod, who didn't understand, who didn't "get" Norman, who apparently didn't think to look through account history, gives 2 day ban because they thought the intent was to impersonate Q and/or be mysterious? These are bannable offenses? That's an indicator that the account is a glowie or shill? In either case, it's a bit concerning that any mod, new or not, so prone to knee jerk judgement would continue to have the power to ban. Good to know this mod was apparently reprimanded, and it would appear that whoever "WE" is, unbanned NFD or at least did not extent the 2 day ban.
Consider this... what if NFD was actually Q or part of "Q"? Then the account's posts would not have been impersonating or attempts to mimic Q drops, but actual Q drops...
What if "GAW" isn't the outside but the inside? If NFD is [part of] "Q" then they aren't outside comms because well, derp...
You assume that NFD isn't [part of] "Q" to prove your assumption, because if your assumption is correct then NFD can't be [part of] "Q" because it'd be outside comms since NFD is not [part of] "Q", as your assumption requires... terribly illogical line of reasoning there fren...
Consider the alternative... what if you've misjudged the identity and nature of "NFD"? Or are you always right? Can you prove that "NFD" is absolutely not [part of] "Q"? How so? Do you know both entities? Can you prove it?
You asserted that TDU is NFD. Therefore the burden of proof is absolutely on you to prove your claim.
I'm not trying to piss you off. I'm simply asking questions. You're choosing how to respond to them. If you choose to get pissed off, that's your choice, but it's not evidence proving your accusation that I'm intentionally trying to piss you off. Instead of getting pissed off, perhaps better address the questions and control your emotions so that we might continue to engage in meaningful dialogue?
Yeah it’s not an official thing, but there have been a lot of coincidences when years from the date of a Q post we get some major news that lines up with a previous post. Q himself never mentioned these deltas it was just something we Anons came up with and tracked. I wish there was more to it, and yes often nothing happens on the delta dates.
Another interesting one is Trump said Covid would be gone by Easter gone by April. However for the past few years that didn’t happen but this year a trump appointed judge lifted mask mandate on Easter pretty much. Which is wildly coincidental!
Qalert Link: https://qalerts.app/?q=Apr%2020
Trying something new here. This is an open discussion on anything relating to the Deltas for today.
Previous digs, coincidences, news, etc - All information is welcomed.
Keep in mind that newer anons might not be aware of the drops on this day, so let's enlighten them and get them up to speed.
WWG1WGA
I love this! Thank you!
Thanks. This board is quickly losing Q focus.
You're welcome. I'm not going to get into it, but it loses focus even more when users complain about it instead of doing something to fix it.
The shills jump in and parrot comments like these and pull the board down even further. This makes our jobs as mods harder.
All I did today was take a link from Qalerts and posted it to start a discussion, any user could've done this at any time, and messaged the mods to sticky it.
Nothing against you personally, but I'm absolutely fed up with comments like these.
Sorry. I was just trying to offer some recognition and encouragement.
Don't worry, brother. You're good. No harm, no foul.
Im sorry, but what is a Delta? I have been reading the Q boards from the start but never got what a Delta was. A little help here if possible...
Long story short, we're taking the current day and comparing it to the Q posts from that same day to gain insight.
I urge you to read more info on this:
How it started: https://joyinliberty.com/q/deltas/
Where it's going: https://qsoldiers.wordpress.com/2019/08/12/how-to-read-the-q-clock/
4/20 = DT
♥
Probably not related but with Musk being in the news, maybe some relevance to his $420 Tesla buyout tweet.
What does SR June JA mean? Also who is AS?
Seth Rich. Julian Assange. Adam Schiff.
Now look at drop #1199 and todays 4 year delta?
https://qagg.news/?read=1199
Sorry you also might not know that today in the UK a court approved the extradition to the USA of JA. IT's up to the Home Sec Priti Pratel, who will most likely let it go ahead. Seth Rich is linked to JA and Wikileaks. Seth Rich was the DNC staffer who was murdered in suspicious circumstances and many believe he had copied files from the DNC server onto a thumb drive, the server was never hacked (we know this because of the DL speed of the file transfer was too fast for it to be over the internet) Wikileaks have this info, ie JA.
25 times too fast.
Anyone still bleating about the DNC's "hacked" server is a fake news shill.
His name was Seth Rich.
Never forgotten. RIP Seth Rich.
He may not be dead.
Amen fren!
JA is likely Julian Assange given that WikiLeaks is linked to. However could JA be another reference to James Alefantis?
James Lemorte.
I dig it. 😎
Could be a possibility.
There are double meanings.
I'd say no since SR is before it and connects to Julian
AS = Adam Shiftyman
I like this. Just like old times. Getting exciting again ? Thanks!
Another vector researchers could consider in regards to dates is using the Hebrew calendar, as well. Q emphasized the importance of the clock for context. The elites since the Sumerians, have used the lunisolar calendar to track time and rule over society. The Gregorian calendar is important but I don't believe it is the only calendar, or clock, we should be using to make sense of Q.
Some Q sites easily convert to the Hebrew calendar so it's not too hard to research in this format but it can get complicated as it obviously does not sync up with the Gregorian. The Hebrew calendar was adopted by the Jews during the Babylonian exile and is therefore very similar to the Babylonian calendar which is based off the Sumerian calendar. I did find what I believe to be critical information when using the Hebrew calendar as another factor for guidance. I explain it more in the one post in my history. There's a lot to it but I'm fairly certain it's of critical importance.
That's a whole rabbit hole waiting to be explored. It's been on my mind lately as well, I just haven't dug in yet.
The reason being is once you sync up to the Hebrew calendar, you sync up to corresponding verses in the Torah as well.
Anyways, here's the deltas for the 19th:
https://qalerts.app/?q=Apr%2019
Looks like we run into u/catsfive's post from this morning:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hbg6vISD/and-heres-what-qs-said-about-ass/c/
And u/BQnita's: https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hbg6uSyW/london-ap--a-british-judge-on-we/
I think we're on to something here...
Q drop on JA aka Julian Assange notes "June ETA."
Q drop 1202
Was Q standing on Epstein Island when he snapped that photo?
https://filmdaily.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/epstein-island_lede.jpg
It's always surprised me that no one put together the titles of all the photos
Locking as I am tired of dealing with the cult of Norman.
user reports: MAGAdeburger - Be Respectful
I'll let another mod determine your fate.
is Maggie Nixon making the human trafficking SOS symbol in this image?
Who’s the creepy old crone?
Sally Kellerman?
It's fashion model Lauren Hutton.
Ahhh, yes.
Never cared for her either. - Thanks!
Thank you! Had never heard of her before now.
Find the way she’s holding onto Maggie very creepy, not going to lie.
Just in case you were wondering, u/Norman_F_Dixon isn't banned. I took a look at the account status.
I didn't see any of them, so it must have been before I was a mod. He's not banned, and it's very easy to make the statement that he can't comment without showing any proof.
Why doesn't Norman take a screen recording of him not being able to make comments and send it to the mod team? Whether its from you or CHAOS, it doesn't matter.
That's not something that I can dig up easily, if at all, so I would assume that you would have that data in question.
I'll tell you one thing though, I'm not going to take orders from someone who makes false accusations or vague threats.
I'm not going to ban you, but I am very emotionally checked out with finding a solution to your problem due to the disrespect of your comments. If Norman gives a shit, he can either message the modteam, or have you or CHAOS message the modteam, with a screen recording showing his username, and his inability to post or comment.
Right now, his account doesn't show having any limits on my side.
If he really wanted to come back, he could easily make a new account and name it "Norman_F_Dixon2" or "Norman_D" or any combination, and we'll know its him by the depth and content of his posts. I'm not sure why he doesn't do this. Again, his IP is not banned.
It should be noted that TDU didn't single you out, or accuse YOU directly for any of the questionable actions taken against NFD. TDU is just trying to figure out what happened and why. These are valid inquiries. But I do also agree with the confusion here regarding NFD. As v8power has also pointed out, according to the public mod logs, NFD is not banned. Last time I received a PM reply from NFD was right around when the initial ban occurred, and that PM has since been deleted. It went something along the lines of "it's not worth the effort dealing with these idiots" (my paraphrase).I agree that it seems odd that if NFD is not banned, he'd be unable to post. It would be great to get to the bottom of all this.
While you're looking into questionable ban issues, can you look into the ban history for ExpertBread / NotExpertBread? There were shenanigans with this standup, brilliant community member before the issues with Norman. Several of us inquired through posts/comments, though much of those seem to have since been deleted. I had a PM reply from a mod that has also since been deleted, in which I was told that it couldn't be figured out which mod banned Bread, and yet later on it was admitted plainly that said mod did know which mod banned Bread ("one of our most active mods") but then when he asked this banning mod WHY he banned Bread, he claimed that he "didn't remember"... if I remember correctly, this might have all happened before there were any public mod logs. If you click on his account, it now says "user deleted their account.". That's weird. ExpertBread was banned. Mod confirmed that. So he deleted his own account, or was it deleted because of his ban? It appears that the account NotExpertBread wasn't deleted, although all of the comments are deleted. The posts are still visible though. Interestingly, I noticed that all of Mitch's comments have been deleted, but like NotExpertBread, the posts are still visible.
Appreciate any research and insights into these strange happenings that you might be able to provide.
Firstly TDU is NFD. That is easy enough to figure out.
We encourage mods to make notes when banning especially on older accounts.
How are you certain that TDU is NFD? Just because these accounts exhibit similar posting styles? Do the accounts share the same IP? What other hard evidence is there to prove the accounts are the same person? What do you think about CHAOS_ACTUAL or the other dozen accounts associated with TDU and NFD? What do you make of the covfefe thread in which these associated accounts all posted? Do they all belong to the same user? Are these just aliases? Dummy accounts to reactivate in case one is banned? But what do you make of the various threads where these accounts were posting comments seemingly in conversation with each other? You think that one person really went through the trouble to do that to make it look like they were all different unique users? Or is it possible, rather more likely, that TDU is not NFD, that these accounts are all separate users, but are part of a coordinated group? Maybe just a bunch of friends? Seems like there are other reasonable conclusions to make about said account(s) aside from TDU=NFD... not saying that's not true, could be... but is there more conclusive evidence that we're not privy to?
As to ExpertBread, can you address my questions about that situation? Do you also think that Bread was another alias of an "entity" you seem to think is TDU/NFD et al?
I'm not going to disclose our back end. But you can plainly see when the accounts were created and TDU's post count jumped significantly after NFD's ban. TDU was essentially inactive before that time. Why would someone that inactive suddenly be concerned with NFD? Why are you so concerned? I know nothing of expertbread.
Something that I always found odd was that on the public record of mod logs, it always just says "a moderator ____" but it won't reveal which mod did what. Why is that? Is there a reason why the public can't know which mod did what? Is there no functionality on the mod end that tells them which mods did what? A mod once said he couldn't find out who banned ExpertBread, and yet then he stated that he asked the banning mod ("our most active mod") why he banned Bread, and the answer was "herp derp i can't remember", which reveals two things: the aforementioned mod certainly could find out which mod did the banning, and lied about not knowing, and apparently mods could just ban without giving a reason, or the banning mod was lying about "not remembering" why... of course all of this could just have been made up to further confuse and deter questions being asked... who knows? We certainly don't know. Can't know. The site has very little transparency when it comes to the actions of mods...
I think these are all fair questions... Who owns the site? Who pays the bills? Who has ultimate power over the mods? Why is there little transparency about any of this? I've always found it interesting that Facebook will not let you post or message links to GAW using that platform. They claim the website is a violation of their user rules because of "violence" and other bullshit. It's as if "people" don't want this place to be advertised in the mainstream, don't want traffic here... who doesn't want the visibility and why?
This is all just very... mysterious... to say the least.
I take offense to this, because I work hard to maintain this site in my spare time without pay, contract, or any form of compensation whatsoever.
I got the mod position by asking to help. I was a normal user just like everyone else. I didn't know any insiders or anything like that.
You can fuck off with that shit.
Norman is not banned, and he can post anytime. I dug into this because you and his other friends asked in the comments. Again, I did this on my spare time to answer a question for fellow users and I really don't appreciate your accusations.
Send me a link to the thread and point out which comment.
Great questions. I dont know the answer to them.
But I do know one thing, you dont spit in someone's eye and ask for their help. Watch your tongue.
Hi Norman.
Judging by the message
"You are either a Glowie or a Shill! Either way you are banned a few days while we look into your comments further!"
I believe it was a new mod that was later temporarily revealed of their mod duties.
Likely because of your long posts with no paragraphs or coherent thought in an attempt to look like a Q drop or to appear to be mysterious.
So new mod, who didn't understand, who didn't "get" Norman, who apparently didn't think to look through account history, gives 2 day ban because they thought the intent was to impersonate Q and/or be mysterious? These are bannable offenses? That's an indicator that the account is a glowie or shill? In either case, it's a bit concerning that any mod, new or not, so prone to knee jerk judgement would continue to have the power to ban. Good to know this mod was apparently reprimanded, and it would appear that whoever "WE" is, unbanned NFD or at least did not extent the 2 day ban.
Consider this... what if NFD was actually Q or part of "Q"? Then the account's posts would not have been impersonating or attempts to mimic Q drops, but actual Q drops...
Better not sock this guy, might be something special about him...
Just saying...
The mod was a noob and given very little guidance. That's all. I seldom respond to appeals of someone that I didn't ban.
"what if NFD was actually Q or part of "Q"?"
And what if NFD was the queen of england? No outside coms.
"might be something special about him..."
Yeah, something along those lines...
What if "GAW" isn't the outside but the inside? If NFD is [part of] "Q" then they aren't outside comms because well, derp...
You assume that NFD isn't [part of] "Q" to prove your assumption, because if your assumption is correct then NFD can't be [part of] "Q" because it'd be outside comms since NFD is not [part of] "Q", as your assumption requires... terribly illogical line of reasoning there fren...
Consider the alternative... what if you've misjudged the identity and nature of "NFD"? Or are you always right? Can you prove that "NFD" is absolutely not [part of] "Q"? How so? Do you know both entities? Can you prove it?
Can I prove it??? The burden of proof isn't on me. Are you looking to piss me off? Because you're getting very close to doing that.
You asserted that TDU is NFD. Therefore the burden of proof is absolutely on you to prove your claim.
I'm not trying to piss you off. I'm simply asking questions. You're choosing how to respond to them. If you choose to get pissed off, that's your choice, but it's not evidence proving your accusation that I'm intentionally trying to piss you off. Instead of getting pissed off, perhaps better address the questions and control your emotions so that we might continue to engage in meaningful dialogue?
I provided that evidence.
Time difference. One year delta’s are one year in the future from the original posting date of a Q post
Yeah it’s not an official thing, but there have been a lot of coincidences when years from the date of a Q post we get some major news that lines up with a previous post. Q himself never mentioned these deltas it was just something we Anons came up with and tracked. I wish there was more to it, and yes often nothing happens on the delta dates.
Another interesting one is Trump said Covid would be gone by Easter gone by April. However for the past few years that didn’t happen but this year a trump appointed judge lifted mask mandate on Easter pretty much. Which is wildly coincidental!