Congress must pass legislation that codifies Roe v. Wade as the law of the land in this country NOW. And if there aren’t 60 votes in the Senate to do it, and there are not, we must end the filibuster to pass it with 50 votes. (article link with Bernie quote is below)
Why would Congress codify something being struck down by SCOTUS, knowing it will also be struck down? As a pressure tactic to end the filibuster.
Bernie’s call to end the filibuster is not about Roe v. Wade, if this ruling is true and stands the DS knows they can’t counteract it through legislation. But they need the filibuster out of the way to ram their agenda through before they lose control in November.
If they can get that done a new Republican majority will not be able to repeal anything because Biden will veto everything they send up.
Panic in DC continues.
There are multiple prongs for the leak. Its a call to action - battle stations so to speak. Senate will try to nuke filibuster. At the same time, the folks controlling the Antifa and illegal terrorists will start prepping for the riots.
BTW, what the heck is this about "law of the land" ? So what if Congress passes a legislation, if its a constitutional issue, states can take it back to SCOTUS, right?
Exactly! This is a typical and cynical play by the DS. They know such a law would not stand, but it’s useful as an emotional sledgehammer to end the filibuster.
Bigger problem if they nuke the filibuster is next stop: Court Packing
Ding ding ding
Yup. We already know Mittens and Collins are down to stab is again.
The Pavlovian dog whistles to get the zombies salivating over the promise of fresh meat, that never finds its way to the table. I wonder if the zombies even have a clue as to, someone is pulling the strings, or the master calls so I must dutifully go.
Correct. Congress doesn't establish new constitutional rights via mere statutory law. They'd have to pass an amendment, which would have to be ratified by the states. Any "pro abortion" statute they might pass (such as denying Medicare to states who ban abortion), will be struck down by this Court.
This is an interesting take. Perhaps another one of those bright Dem ideas that can backfire?
I am not sure thats in their DNA ...
who said: " The Senate was always the target."?
Q
Is anyone on their side smart enough to think that up? They usually just do dumb shit.
Maybe desperate enough.
Look at all they’ve done by releasing a bio weapon in Oct 19. They aren’t to be underestimated and layer their evil well
"Why would Congress codify something being struck down by SCOTUS, knowing it will also be struck down?"
Respectfully, I believe you might be misinterpreting the leaked SCOTUS ruling. The Supreme Court is not (and can't) say that abortion is illegal. All they can do is regards to Roe V Wade is say that the act is either Constitutionally protected or not Constitutionally protected.
The original R vs W ruling said that it is protected. The leaked ruling points to that being overturned. Which if it is, would then make it a legislative issue. So as much as it pains me to say it, Sanders is valid here in saying they need to pass legislation (along with the usual leftist treachery to get rid of the filibuster).
Now, abortion could be rendered unconstitutional if a case reached the SCOTUS where the thrust was something along the lines of the unborn having constitutional protections. But that would be an entirely separate case from R vs W.
*Note: I am not in the legal profession. This is just my layman's understanding of the case and constitutional law.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment. I’m still struggling to see how Congress can codify the very same notion SCOTUS is ruling unconstitutional.
Bernie Sanders plainly says:
“Congress must pass legislation that codifies Roe v. Wade as the law of the land...”
Yes, they can try to enact something, but this SCOTUS ruling, if true, will set limits on what will pass Constitutional muster.
Why did Bernie Sanders join Joe Biden in making such a “highly unusual move” to personally intervene and help rig a billion dollar referendum in Racine, Wisconsin in the April 2020 primary?
Bernie also led a major rally in Racine for the Working Families Agenda with the Iron Stache running a fake candidacy for Paul Ryan’s seat.
https://journaltimes.com/news/local/sanders-follows-biden-in-endorsing-unified-referendum-yes-campaign-is-surprised/article_6603b168-1461-511a-949d-85dc3f83c792.html
The same group behind the referendum was organized by Anna Makanju for the Obama campaign called Yes We Can Racine when she was an operative for George Soros.
None of these are coincidences.
Racine is the Root of the rigged elections and their entire Agenda.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Data_Center
This "Bluffdale Node" is actually Tier IV, though public info claims it is Tier III. Show me any other tier III government or otherwise with that much security. Backbone network runs through Colorado Springs and Boulder (for NORAD, obviously), and to a PCN (private core network / aka 'hidden' backbone) in... Wisconsin. The trunk is deep buried fiber that links bluffdale's 'mirrored' data center (for redundancy) in none other than: Racine.
Now ask yourself: which one is the mirrored center... And at this point does it matter? An NSA data center in Hatch and Romney's backyard? In the desert? Why?
There are only two things that would need the amount of water used at the data centers in bluffdale and Racine. Nuclear Reactors (neutron moderation, or coolant for fusion reactor) are one possibility. Cooling for MPQC (massively parallel quantum computing) is the other. My source claims it's the latter (or they have a lot of people, products, and other stuff in cryo, kek) . "Q" indeed. Breakable encryption would explain why/how white-hats have it all.
All roads lead to Racine. There and back again.
Have any sources on the data center mirror in racine you could point me towards? I'd like to learn more and my searches have yielded nothing.
The Foxconn Data Center in Mt pleasant is supposedly the access point, but I'm also trying to verify this. My source states they have over a million square feet of data center real estate, but even with 5-6 buildings their floor plans only allow about a third of that. There are be sub levels though. I've been trying to find info on their water usage, but apparently that info is very tightly controlled.
https://lyldenlawnews.com/2021/07/18/the-filibuster-and-the-constitution/
That can’t be true considering they just held a vote to get rid of the filibuster with majority rule, but Manchin and Sinema thankfully had some common sense and voted against their party.
These are quotes from the article about Rule XXII. I vaguely remember the previous vote. Wasn't this a vote for a quorum to vote on this?
For now.
God is going to protect the babies/innocents. You know all people that are on this, are pedos. God help us with these babies against these Satanists in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.
bernie sanders is a namblatool <===tell me i am wrong
{thats what he was doing the first 40 years they never quite get too
Bernie was connected to Nambla? New to me. I just knew he was a commie, probably a KGB plant.
Idk about Nambla but Ik he allegedly wrote about a rape fantasy a few decades ago
Found it
Sounds like it was less alleged than I thought
There was this I can’t say how true this is but it’s what I found.
Wow, didnt know that !
-Bernie… Charming sicko.
Nice projection from barney sangals
Typical nasty commie.
he was running around with the ginsberg pack....
enter text
Manchin and Sinema will not end filibuster.
You know. SCOTUS overturning Roe v Wade is a MASSIVE story. What might be even bigger is the leak itself. This could destroy the court.
Destroy it or maybe save it. It could be a very good thing if the gloves come off and we get to see behind the veil. It would be a great deterrent to Judicial activism and judicial cowardice.
And in a weird way, maybe this leak actually preserves the ruling. Until the actual ruling was issued there was a chance someone could be persuaded to change their vote. Now that is probably less lit.
I remember reading an article about how even though the Justices might have disagreements that no matter what, they protected the integrity of the court. That they respected each other even when they disagreed. It was this unity that kept the court strong and respected.
Now ALL of that is put at risk or possibly even completely destroyed. This is going to create an actual rift of distrust in the SCOTUS. The glue that held the Court together is now gone. It's no longer the Court versus the world. Now they are going to turn on each other.
Since when do we give a shit what this commie says?
Only when he’s doing what commie’s do, trying to violate our constitutional rights.
What filibuster? Sorry. Trying to catch up.
Sorry, they aren’t trying to break up a current filibuster, they are trying to abolish the rule altogether.
I hope you are right. But Bernie’s tweet makes it pretty clear they want to use the emotional power of this issue to make another run at ending the filibuster.
Here is some emotion on the subject. We the people are tired of OUR will being ignored. I'm tired of Bernie sanders acting lie he gives a shit about freedom. He is aliar and shill.
I said this a few hours ago. This is a hill most Dems are willing to die on. If Roe ends up being overturned, be prepared for most Dems to advocate for scorched earth and will get rid of Joe, as Kamala won’t hesitate, without blinking.
Good analysis. Make sense
Already seeing the wokers demanding the court be expanded so they cant end the fillbuster. There is something fishy going on and it wont surprise any of us to see them rig the country for their NWO agenda.
Also once the wokers get their riots and summer of peace and destruction, they will probably mandate the vax on the same grounds.
They will toss out the filibuster rule. The final vote in the Senate will be 59 to keep it in place and 61 to end it. Kamala will cast the last 20 deciding votes
You mean 136,000 ?
There are only 100 votes in the senate plus one vote by the vice president if there is a 50-50 tie. So in this case they don't need 136,000 votes. They will save those extra votes for November. LOL
This is so shocking to me I am disturbed by the level of evil in the entirety of government.