Comments (36)
sorted by:
Retaining_H2O 13 points ago +13 / -0

If the NY Times denies it is happening... then it must be twice as bad as we think.

PepeSee 3 points ago +3 / -0


What-Me-Worry 11 points ago +11 / -0

These people must have no soul right?

Seriously, they are being paid to squash a story that should at least be looked into. Even just a little bit.

Not spending all your efforts word-smithing a hit piece on anyone / someone trying to protect innocent kids.

redlotus69 7 points ago +7 / -0

They had a soul.

Now satan has it.

What-Me-Worry 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sadly I believe you are right.

muhqtardtho 4 points ago +4 / -0

At the bottom of every journalist job opening it contains the final line:

Those with souls need not apply.

purkiss80 [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Its fucking disgusting is all i can say...

MileHiLife 4 points ago +4 / -0

What overrepresented tribe, with around 1.5% of population, own the media- be it print, digital, over air, cable, Hwood, streaming etc? We can add healthcare, education, and of course finance/banks.

[Hint] 99% of Congress has a sworn oath to said tribe, over the U.S.

PepeSee 1 point ago +1 / -0

No soul indeed. I've ready some really horrific stuff...like 15 different sperm samples in a rape victim.

CQVFEFE 3 points ago +3 / -0

“The kids are a prop for them to use to spread their message,” said Mia Bloom, an expert on extremist radicalization and the co-author of “Pastels and Pedophiles: Inside the Mind of QAnon.”

“They are instrumentalizing the children for internal propaganda and to further their political agenda,” she said.

To further the "political agenda"...of saving children from people who are paying to rape and eat them.

The brave patriots manning the border, rescuing the trafficked chidren, are the ones using kids as props.

I can't even

OneMoreTim3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Qanon was at the Mexican border and I missed it?!!! Darn!

Cookitup 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just like how their Nobel Prize winning economist, Paul Krugman was caught with kiddie porn on his computer and it was an “attempt to Qanon him” (his words)

Hing 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's like they're purposefully trying to bring their own crimes into public consciousness.

DesertBrat 3 points ago +3 / -0

The NY Times have ran pro-pedo articles in the past. I am disgusted but not surprised. This is from PM describing one of the articles.


COanon 3 points ago +3 / -0

The MSM cancer continues.

deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
Fikkan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Accessories to the crime.

SuckaFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny how CBP/ICE and DSHS disagrees with that assessment. Hell, even the FBI disagrees.

GirlGoat144 2 points ago +2 / -0

That'll bite them in the ass pretty soon.

Kaizen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course. Because drawing attention to it and it’s existence is a threat to the supplies of underage children for these kid fuckers. Bunch of groomers and pedophiles.

stevethefish76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't the NYT still run by Mark Thompson, the villain from BBC who covered for Jimmy Saville all those years while he was raping dead kids?

CQVFEFE 2 points ago +2 / -0


If any reporters for NYT would ever do any actual reporting, they would "found" the proof

RS34ME 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny, I know a county sheriff here in Texas that says quite the opposite.

Jamezelo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anytime I see Qanon I just instantly know the "journalism" is gonna be the same tired attack they keep trying.

They love to create boogeymen

dildoschwaggins 2 points ago +2 / -0

So now it's bad to double check on the welfare of children? I don't see any investigative reports on Child Protective Services and their practices...

HairyWBush 1 point ago +1 / -0

we should focus on the authors of this stupid shit. who are they?

FreeMainiac 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, it's owned by a rich Mexican guy. How'd he make so much money? I'll give you 1 guess

stevethefish76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Carlos Slim? He used to be, dunno about now. But the NYT is run by Mark Thompson, the man who covered for Jimmy Saville all those years at the BBC.

TrumpLovinChildOfGod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well where in the hell do they want us to believe the 20,000 children this administration admits to “losing” have gone??? BTW, I’m one of those crazy right wing vigilantes that witnessed this first hand…it’s worse than you think.

LadyBoothall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again with the words... unfounded conspiracy theories... how many hours not even days anymore.... until it is a proven theory. Traditional Media is disgusting.

Hope70 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeh, just like every other “conspiracy” has proved to be true. If you wanted to look like a “good guy”, the MSM would put a few investigative reporters on this to prove or disprove by thoroughly investigating. But no, the just will all spout the 04:00 am talking points they are told to. This makes them complicit in trafficking. So “journalist” better watch what they say, lest they be swooped up in the conspiracy and prosecuted when all is said and done.

Infidel440 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like the first part, “patriots” intercepting migrant children to validate their families.