Even the gays can't stand the wokeness, interesting reddit thread
(www.reddit.com)
Comments (87)
sorted by:
Molested children find comfort with their own kind. We should be convicting and executing child molesters. This is the way to destroy the stranglehold the pervert polititions have and take out a lot of other trash. We should be pushing for the death penalty of the mass molesters like mass murderers.
It's true. As a hairdresser of 40 years, I've asked almost every gay person if they were molested and the answer is always yes. I think it's too painful to face and this is what happens, the gay men always act like they enjoyed it and asked for it. Ugh. So gross.
This.
And I believe several, if not most (if not all) those who say they were not molested actually were, but at so young an age (infancy) that they don't remember. In the last couple decades, chemicals may be playing a part as well. (I'm an elementary school teacher, and I have noticed significantly more highly-effeminate prepubescent boys in the past 10 years)...Maybe water doesn't just make Alex Jones' frogs gay.
Well, there is some truth in that. Metals like aluminium, mercury and other additives creates a pleasant enviroment for parasites that can most likely change your behavior and thoughts. The parasites turn people gay, but there are also other factors mentioned above me.
Take ivermectin even when not sick
There were no highly effeminate boys. Some slightly effeminate ones ... Beta males, but nothing like what I'm seeing now, which is like 2-3% of the boy population is more effeminate than the average girl, and they're too young to be doing it on purpose. I remember one boy from 25 years ago who was a total gender dysphoria case, and that's it until the past <10 years, and I can think of 4 or 5 at the school I'm at right now. Now, maybe people aren't discouraging it from a behavioural standpoint nowadays due to woke mentality, whereas it used to be less socially acceptable for boys to act like girls so it was shouted, greased l teased, or beaten out of them before. All I know is, I see a huge difference.
The beatings are key.
They learn it from Disney+ and other media outlets, no doubt...
Plastic, soy. It all converts to estrogen in boys
Its the fucking soy and plastics. In nature 1-2% of studied species present as homosexual, with some hint that the more offspring the higher the likelyhood, as if nature is saying ok Becky you've spammed the genepool abit too much.
Hormone levels today are so dismal there arnt even real men left what your seeing is the impact of a toxic environment. Even baby food is loaded with soy, vegan burgers will put boobs on men its an environmental plauge
That was the comment that got Milo Yanoppolis in so much trouble. He told the story of a priest molesting him but then tried to act like he really liked it and it was a good thing etc. He was destroyed over that.
By that logic all heteros were molested by the opposite sex and liked it. Who touched you??
Being hetero is normal. Penis goes in to vagina. Nature. No need to groom. Take your false equivalency and shove it up your ass, homo.
Woah. Someones triggered
Calling bullshit = triggered.
Lol
42% yourself
Go drink alone while your wife is out tilll 2am
no u
Like bartenders, hairdressers often become close to their regulars and sometimes act as confidants or informal therapists.
I'm also a hairstylist with 40 years experience. I don't believe the hairstylist that commented was necessarily referring to his/her clients. Most likely it's their colleages as the hair industry employs a lot of gay men.
Lol, fair question for you to ask.
No concept of boundaries?
Like ghey pride parades, go tell it on the rainnbow mountain.
[Their] gay agenda has gone so over the top that schools actually sanction tranny reading time for kindergarteners.
What about our boundaries? The ones in place for millennium... and with good reason.
PDJT suggested that in a 2012 tweet, fast trial, death penalty.
Yeap, referred to them as perverts, it may have been during the Anthony Weiner saga.
It's generational and for most starts at an extremely young age. Victims become predators, the cycle goes on. The average human beings character is defined by the age of 5 yrs old. Most molestors were, themselves, victimized by then.
Sad, yes, but the cycle has to stop somewhere and only the stiffest of penalties will help thwart it... but the sexual force is strong for those broken- it'll be a lifelong battle.
This.
You cannot forget or forgo the fair trial. There are many women that will lie about their doing inappropriate things with the kids, or will threaten to say that, in order to get the most alimony, child support and 90% custody of the kids.
When 'gay marriage' became a thing, a gay friend told me it wasn't even a gay issue at the time. They had no marriage movement or even desire to be married for the majority's part, and was influenced from 'outside' sources. His words.
They already had it in function, I guess. I can see both sides of the gay marriage argument though.
I just believe that at this point from a legal perspective they should have the same right to marriage that anyone else has, even though marriage used to be a spiritual bonding provided through religion.
It can still be both of these things for different people, and neither can negate the other. Perhaps the eye should be cast at the government for turning marriage into something with legal benefits / negatives, which was not what marriage was meant to be.
Civil unions have been around for a long time. The gay marriage issue was mostly about trying to force people into recognizing a spiritual bond via legislature. The very nature of marriage is a religious one and is quite literally forbidden in most of the religious doctrine. The adoption of marriage by the legal system does not remove the religious aspects of marriage. The homosexual's could have easily pressed for federal recognition of civil union without any debate or uproar. The very insistence of "marriage" was specifically chosen as inflammatory. I would have willingly given up the legal term married and been quite satisfied in all being categorized as civil unions. Marriages could be relegated to religious identification only and given the same rights, privileges and responsibilities as civil unions with the legal framework. This would have been a simple and equitable solution to disentangle religious doctrine from the legal system.
agreed
Marriage is now a contract between the man and the woman with the government being an interested party on her side.
Likely it was pushed hard by the wedding industry. They already rake in ridiculous amounts of money, why not hose the gays too?
This was already in place with civil unions. There are also living wills, wills, power of attorney. All of these are different ways to obtain the same rights and privileges of a married couple. In some areas of the country, Civil Unions were not obtainable within the area, but the legality of a Civil Union that was legally obtained was recognized. The simplest and least difficult solution was to federally mandate that Civil Unions were recognized universally. This would have precluded the acrimonious debate and nullified it. There would have been an extremely small minority that would have bothered to defend Civil Unions.
In the UK civil partnerships were opened to all couplings, but no, that wasnt good enough, it had to be called marriage and it had to be potentially conducted in a church before they were happy. And of course they still arent happy.
It was not the tax/inheritance benefits they were after (the tax benefits were lost long ago, and the inheritance can be arranged using a will) it was to mock the institution of marriage deliberately, as an act of vandalism.
To me it is as stupid as wheelchair users wanting to call ramps steps, because that is what able bodied people use, and why should they be any different?
Others opinions are patently false.
Got it.
What year are you speaking of?
The push for gay marriage is 20 years old now.
Things have changed due to rings in noses - as newly engineered 'needs'.
The point. The gay community promoting 'Gay marriage' (supported or not, allowed or not) is A RECENT TREND, not a tradition of any kind.
Correct. It's a FACT that the gay community was until recently, divided as to their OPINIONS on marriage among gays. Or more accurately, didn't really see it as a need.
This new 'need' is part of the push for a newly defined 'equity'.
My friend's opinion was at the time, the more predominant one. That opinion being not FOR or AGAINST the idea. Rather, that the idea was MOOT as gays typically had multiple partner scenarios. Typically. Your agreement isn't required. Your friends desire to marry doesn't change the FACT as stated.
it was NOT a gay talking point until recently.
My friend is over 60 and has been part of the community his whole life. He also is in an inter-racial relationship. I think he's in a position where he would know better than you or your younger newly 'woke' gay friend as to the historical accuracy.
Wow, you sure are defensive about an informed opinion.
One guy told me that the community didn't have a real hard-on for marriage until it was pushed recently. His partner agreed. They aren't the only gays i know or have ever known. That's pretty funny.
You're 'one guy' too, so i guess i can discount everything you say.
That's how this works, right?
You're projecting the butt hurt shit now aren't you?
I'm slightly amused.
That's it. Sorry to disappoint.
"the alphabet people"
Lettuce Guacamole Bacon Taco. Sounds horrible.
Lets Go Bury Tyrants
Lets Get Biden To Quit
To each their own, buddy, but I think that sounds delicious.
Ah. If they only put the Queer shit in, you could add tomatoes and make a Quesadilla. Sounds better, imo.
Tacco? Do you mean taco or tobacco?
Edited. Sorry, I'm not a Mexican.
Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender.
Not sure why Transgender gets lumped in with gay, lesbian & bi though. LGB is about sexuality, T is supposedly about gender. Completely separate topics.
The alphabet mafia
LMAO maybe they will begin to wake up and resist the wokeness!
I hadn’t really thought of it before but it makes a lot of sense. There are plenty of LGB people who just want to live a normal life. They don’t want to be associated with the crazy left. They want to be treated the same as everyone else.
Crazy. You mean gays are people, with diverse opinions and beliefs?
Trust the hard Truth.
I have a masculine woman on my sales staff. She is the most hard core right wing human being I’ve ever met in my life. She hates the blue hairs , hates feminine men, hates trannies. Hates the woke mafia.
Given enough time, the left always eats its own
I never said all of them were
I had read this article back when it was still on Medium before it got marked as hate speech. Author did a deep dive into the money aspect and basically how the grassroots campaigns got hijacked by our favorite Big X players. Long, but worth a read - given it was written four years ago, it provides interesting insight into what is playing out right now.
https://suedonym.substack.com/p/inauthentic-selves-the-modern-lgbtq?s=r
Anybody else think that the new pride flag is ugly?
Because the symbology is:
https://files.catbox.moe/didneh.png
https://files.catbox.moe/t8806w.png
Could be a good red-pill opportunity to sacrifice a reddit account with this information and help them see it.
So ironic...they did the same to the American flag.
Found in said thread: "Cis gay white male" So, these people are so wrapped up in their idealogy that they contradict themselves. I thought Cis, to them, meant "Gender = sex they were born as, attracted to opposite sex" but then the dipshit adds 'gay' and obliterates his point.
I had to look it up, apparently it doesn't imply whether you are straight or gay just that you aren't Trans which is honestly silly to even need a word for it.
The shifting definitions just means whenever you hear someone say Cis, and they're being serious, you can safely ignore anything else they have to say.
Archived: https://archive.ph/eLtUY
I listen to a podcast of two gay guys and they were even saying how they’re over pride month. That maybe gays from the 80s deserve celebrating, but now it doesn’t make sense for everything to be rainbow for a whole month.