The US Supreme Court Case that Could Change Everything
From the website ralandbrunson.com, updated as of November 23, 2022 Background ~ Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of c…
I’m super intrigued by this — just found out about it yesterday.
More resources:
Realist News. Supreme Court takes the critical election case https://youtu.be/TdhjyUFEn3M
Writ of cert filing: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf
Did SCOTUS actually grant review? Until they do, this is a nothingburger.
Not yet, and given how things have panned out with them to date, I’m not holding my breath.
However… the basis of this is on constitutional grounds, and not election fraud — Rule 11. That gives me slightly more hope that they’ll agree to hear it. They would likely remand the case to the lower court.
Indeed, this is a procedural, Constitutional matter. However, I think his argument about Congress being required to hear, investigate and rule on objections, is a weak one to make, especially given that Congress has no Electoral adjudication power under the Constitution. Doesn't matter what 3 USC (fka the ECA 1887) says if the statute itself is unconstitutional. The real criminals liable here, are the state officials who certified unlawful elections and illegally appointed Electors who didn't actually win any elections, and the judges who have refused to adjudicate the cases challenging the unlawful elections.
As to whether review will be granted, I highly doubt it. SCOTUS will argue "lack of standing." The legitimate plaintiffs are the Electors who had their elections stolen (not Trump, technically). Unfortunately, because SCOTUS wrongly ruled in Chiafalo, precedent has been set that will destroy our Electoral system unless remedied.
How do constituents, and legal voters, not have standing to demand their representatives investigate a matter?
Not that I necessarily agree with it, but legal magick 😉
That is what I thought as well but it seems anything is possible.
At the time Jay Sekolow argued that this could go either way and set a precedent. And it did set a precedent which I think has caused a lot of difficulty moving forward due to how the SC ruled at the time.
From the article of OP
"He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied....."
Nothing burger.
Surprised you weren't banned for pointing out the obvious.
A god... not THE God...
https://youtu.be/6VF5P7qLaEQ
Strike me down...
https://youtu.be/iVBX7l2zgRw
I must have guardian 👼🏻
Not a nothingburger at all.
They skipped the 10th circuit filed under national emergency, got a call from the Supreme Court clerk 5 days later. Subsequently the 10th circuit backed up the decicion
All things point to it’s a go if they get 4 of 9 justices to agree
A lot of momentum and timing is everything the SC has an axe to grind and this gives them carte Blanche.
Listen to both videos
Super excited
As I said, until SCOTUS grants review, it's a nothingburger. If they do, well then perhaps it's something. Until then... it should be taken as Kraken 2.0
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
What does this mean? https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/247457/20221123155305329_Waiver%20Letter%20-%2022-0380.pdf
Did they waive the right to respond because it garbage and they’re not wasting their time? Or they have no response because there’s no way out of it?
Wish I was an attorney but in their filing for the tenth circuit court: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221024152923186_20221024-152524-95757879-00000747.pdf
Looks like the argument was basically, it’s a frivolous case and should be tossed. However, it’s now in the SCOTUS so, that to me means, it’s not frivolous and has merit. Enough for them to hear.
Interesting event timeline: https://ralandbrunson.com/
Appears to have been started June 21, 2021
They answer my question and the waiver filed was the door opening for this to go to the SCOTUS.
Okay, this is interesting now.
Start at about the 12:00 mark (sorry for the Santa Surfing link, but I haven’t tried yet to find the original podcast)
This 15 min clip of the podcast discusses the case in greater length
https://rumble.com/v1wbwre-11212022-affirmation-scotus-case-brunson-shares-insight-libs-triggered-news.html
Thanks, fren.
Thanks for the link!
Anyone can file a petition for writ of certiorari.
Doesn’t mean it’ll be granted.
SCOTUS has not granted writ for this yet.
It’s on the docket, but that just means that Brunson filled out the form and mailed it to the right address. No one has gotten around to looking at it yet.
The waiver is just the solicitor general saying that the arguments that led to the lower courts dismissing the case as frivolous have already been adequately argued before those courts. There’s nothing more to say unless SCOTUS rules that the lower courts got this wrong…. and then the most likely outcome is that they will send the case back down to the lower court.
He got a call from the clerk of the court 5 days after skipping the 10th circuit under national emergency - rule 11.
Later the 10th circuit backed him up.
4 of 9 justices need to agree to hear the case
It Glows.
These are Florida statutes that you’re quoting, so to get relief under them the case has to be filed with the Florida state court system. The federal courts all the way up to SCOTUS will only be involved if these statutes conflict with the US constitution or the Florida courts are applying them in a way that violates the US constitution.
Sorry, I’m still not seeing your reference to a federal statute. Which one should we be looking at here?
1st Amendment violations. Electoral procedures as set forth by the constitution by not allowing even a 10-day review to look into credible accounts of election fraud which deprived voters of their right to a free and fair election.
As far as a federal statute, it's the US Constitution.
Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming to these traitorous politicians! Nothing.
And if you read the timeline they give, you can see that the SC wanted this get out of jail free card. Now there's no standing to riot against the Constitution. It's not up for interpretation, and Q has always stressed that this all has to be done by the book.
can you give a TLDR on what this actually is?
It's not rocket science...
Four civilian brothers were successful in bringing a case to the SCOTUS that's citing constitutional law around certain members of congress failing to uphold the oath they took when sworn into office to uphold said document's directives.
Specifically, when an election has questioners to its validity posed by (I believe) 100 members of congress, and the other members not only don't uphold their duty to investigate, they block said investigation, they are committing treason.
The relief sought is the removal of all such persons from their positions of power, including being barred from ever holding public office again.
More info about the case at this link:
https://t.me/candlesinthenight/48550
These are some very bright and courageous guys doing what almost any of us could have done. They deserve all our support.
Let's hope the SCOTUS is up to their level.
Dasting to say the least!
It could be a MOAB, it could go nowhere. If nothing more, it’s got the DS goons feeling heat from yet another direction.
I love the concept of it being a “get out of jail free” card for SCOTUS and the lefties’ heads exploding with a 9-0 ruling.
It definitely ties in with Military being the only way if 340+ members of Congress have to step aside.
Fascinating twists, turns and straight out of left field happenings in this movie! :)
This could possibly be a HUGE step in the direction of "suicide weekend".
Holy crap. My high school girlfriend and best friend worked for Roland Brunson when he lived in Utah and ran a small business. What a decent guy! I remember hearing that he and his brothers were all super musical guys.
It feels like with such an epic game changer as part of their mission, these brothers have some unique DNA...
Just a guess.
I saw the original court papers posted but I confess to not reading them very far. This is the first time I actually understood their premise, and I like it.
DO NOT:
Have dinner with the Clinton’s, Have a close door with the F.B.I., Do not fly, Void starting your car, Do not get a tattoo stating $whackd (John Mcafee), Do not travel Barcelona Spain, Do not stay at an a high-rise apartment in Manhattan (Gustavo Annal), Do not visit a Manhattan jail (Jeff Epstein), your welcome
Well, since we're all going to die from either global warming or Trump's Twitter reinstatement, your list isn't quite complete.
I'll have another round of Hopium please!
Scotus is swamp. No relief is coming from them.
Definitely not a MOAB. . Let it run it’s course. That’s the only way many will realize that it nothing. The gentleman in the explanatory video claims that this is “a get out of jail free card for SCOTUS”. And that they don’t even have to hear the case . They would send federal marshals to arrest Biden , Harris and all congressional defendants. That’s simply not going to happen.
Nothing will come of this. Anyone want to wager a bet?
We don’t need further doses of your pessimism.
Well i notice you didn't take me up on my offer. I dont know how long you've been "awake" to the bullshit but i see you've been here a year. Im over the bullshit constant adrenaline dumps. When it habben it habbens. It aint gonna be via the useless supremo court. Military or bust.
Wagering a bet isn’t the point. It’s just more evidence that you’ve missed it.
Nah. I've done this long enough to know the supreme court isnt saving us. Keep hanging your hat on every new story that's gonna save us. Military is the only way.