A little Tabasco, sprinkled with some Cholula, a dash of red peppers, a little cayenne and chipotle for flavor, some franks red hot, topped off with a little diced up ghost pepper and damn it’s getting spicy in here. Have to wipe the sweat from my brow just looking at all this spicyness.
The drops themselves don't ever refer directly to the LOW manual. Rather, they infer a connection with the manual by the shape and structure of the drops.
I do think that its still important to acknowledge that this is theory. It seems like a bloody good theory, but it's still theory, just like devolution.
As far as Q drop explanation theories, however, its the silver standard, I would say, even if we don't really understand it fully or even much.
I think there are two dimensions to the drops in terms of anons: one is to inspire us in the mission and work of anons during the plan, the other one is for us to prepare for after the plan, aka after the storm.
If LOW theory is right, its probably more about the latter than the former, I think. That, or its simply just a huge, massive, gargantuan Q proof: "future proves past".
I rather like the Constitution, it was made to be built upon. If government cannot follow this one what makes anyone think that they are going to follow another? Seriously? Say it isn't so. Not all, anyway. Good foundation. Solid. Sturdy. A lot can be Repealed and Replaced. Anything that contradicts the Constitution or it's supporting documents, Bill of Rights, should be scrapped. Corporations are not people and are under the strict authority of the government to keep it's Masters safe from harm.
His meaning is that fraud nullifies any constitutional steps taken following the fraud. Once the fraud is discovered, any and all steps taken subsequent to and in faith of the fraud can be set aside, so that a new start can take place (a real election, not a faux election). Or, if it is clear that the fraud advantaged one side, grant the outcome to the remaining side.
There is the oft- repeated legal principle that "fraud vitiates everything." If fraud is discovered, and important legal consequences had followed from accepting the fraud as truth, then those consequences are nullified as being invalid fruit of the fraud.
We cannot use the Constitution to tie a noose of fraud around our neck, and then jump off the yardarm. We go back to the point of fraud, nullify whatever had proceeded, and re-enact events from that point. It will not be pretty...but executing people for treason will not be pretty, either, and there are plenty on this page that are good with that.
"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations and articles, even those found in the Constitution."
Lincoln faced a crisis of similar kind and magnitude. He suspended Habeus Corpus on a limited basis for a relatively short time. He did not "terminate" it.
If Trump has it as a goal, or a necessary step to reestablish our freedoms, to "terminate" the Constitution or major portions of it, and then to remake it in substantial form then I cannot support him or his plan.
The Declaration of Independence is the bedrock of America and of MAGA, and the Constitution is the codification of the principles derived from the Declaration.
These documents are not "sacred". Their principles are the foundations of human liberty. No other system, no other foundation is their equal.
What we are engaged in is a struggle for the preservation of these ideals. To call for the "termination" of these ideals is to turn our idealistic struggle upon itself as its own enemy.
All I can think is that Trump has misspoken himself. As far as I know the DOD Manual of War does not obviate or contradict the Constitution.
So what could he possibly mean by this statement that appears, quite clearly, to be entirely repugnant to the Constitution?
Years ago, Q responded directly to one of my posts that argued that if we lost the Constitution we would lose America with it. Q responded that the Constitution survives.
His meaning is that fraud nullifies any constitutional steps taken following the fraud. Once the fraud is discovered, any and all steps taken subsequent to and in faith of the fraud can be set aside, so that a new start can take place (a real election, not a faux election). Or, if it is clear that the fraud advantaged one side, grant the outcome to the remaining side.
Compare the Presidential Oarh of Office with the notion of "termination" of its Articles -
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Stop dooming. This is all a build up of the eventual return of President Trump or the end of the DNC and the entire Corporation we live in. Then new elections will be held for a majority of Government seats. Not just the Presidency. We are living in what's called the inversion. As Q says, from Dark to Light. This is a classic example of hegelian dialectic. Problem-Reaction-Solution.
Q and the light side are at the end of the day aligned with the enemy/secret societies. The Problem is the Dark side (Cabal, Globalism). Then the Light side is the solution (The Alliance, Patriots). Again as Q says, from Dark to Light.
The Generals, who lost their President in Jan 2021 but, under the Constitution, retained their CinC even now.
The arrangement, whereby the CinC can directly task the USMC, bypassing Congress, and, upon certain conditions, can deploy National Guards out of States, even globally, is about to freak out the Normies. Can't wait.
Im more American than you, traitor, I live in Alaska one of the freest states and I served in the US Army for 16 years as an 11B, so go fuck your socialist communist bullshit somewhere else. When there is this much election fraud and targeted attacks against Trump, the one true president then the only solution is to toss the constitution, declare martial law, and make trump president for life.
If you can't see that the only place this movement goes is Trump being put in charge for life and tossing the constitution then you haven't been paying any attention at all for the last 6 years.
What the hell do you think Trump and Q have been talking about for the last 6 years? YES WE WANT TRUMP TO BE PRESIDENT FOR LIFE, why the hell are you here if you don't?
The trump post is referring to when the constitution is suspended, which is only during marshal law, such as when the commander in chief invokes the insurrection act. Holy crap this crowd is getting slow.
Ha! You caught it. Congrats. This is an egg to tell me two things, who is paying attention with a linguists brain, and, this indicates you probably are not a bot, as this type of programming for an AI would be tedious and doesn’t produce a result that the left can find a way to use. Only some humans catch a spelling error when words that are pronounced the same, but spelled differently to identify a different meaning.
You are a moron and are trying to make shit up after getting caught misspelling a word. Do you really expect me to believe that you purposely did it in order to see "who is paying attention with a linguists brain" (what the fuck does that even mean anyway?} and to also try to weed out bots? Please. Honestly dude. Just take the loss, learn from it, and move on. Ultimately no one gives that much of a shit. Just maybe don't call out large numbers of people here as stupid in general.
Yes, and why did Trump meet with Kari Lake at Mar-a-Lago last week? Here is a somewhat slanted article about the Trump-Lake meeting, but in the photo, look at Trump's body language. He's leaning in, listening intensely.
In the photo is a woman with blond hair (somewhat heavy-set) and a man seated to Kari Lake's right. Could this woman & man have been in the Trump 'calm before the storm' presser back in 2017? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BREos5woyXc
Here is a large photo showing the whole line-up of what Trump says 'The world's great military in this room.'
This is why the Law of War manual was updated and why it is so heavily referred to in the Q drops.
A little Tabasco, sprinkled with some Cholula, a dash of red peppers, a little cayenne and chipotle for flavor, some franks red hot, topped off with a little diced up ghost pepper and damn it’s getting spicy in here. Have to wipe the sweat from my brow just looking at all this spicyness.
I think the references to the law of war manual is a theory by some.
Your post is not only an extremely strong response, it is also an extremely strong response where the context is devoid of reason or justification.
why so heavily implied by the Q drops*
The drops themselves don't ever refer directly to the LOW manual. Rather, they infer a connection with the manual by the shape and structure of the drops.
Details matter.
Yes, that's what I meant, I am careful with language I said "referred to" but that may not have properly described it since as you say, it's coded.
Whew. OK, glad to have the clarification.
I do think that its still important to acknowledge that this is theory. It seems like a bloody good theory, but it's still theory, just like devolution.
As far as Q drop explanation theories, however, its the silver standard, I would say, even if we don't really understand it fully or even much.
I think there are two dimensions to the drops in terms of anons: one is to inspire us in the mission and work of anons during the plan, the other one is for us to prepare for after the plan, aka after the storm.
If LOW theory is right, its probably more about the latter than the former, I think. That, or its simply just a huge, massive, gargantuan Q proof: "future proves past".
We are in the very situation that the Law of War was written and updated for. That's my view. I think the white hats will apply it.
"The laws of God and man have been violated (Exodus 18:16), and the guilty must not go unpunished.
Let's have a new election
Not till we eliminate the criminal fraud of the last one.
After the criminal fraud is exposed and eliminated.
I also belive if we had a quick election, we would beat them bad,as long as they don't have the money......
Not required. SCOTUS v Throckmorton (1938?). "Fraud vitiates everything".
The defrauded candidate is simply declared the winner and gets inaugurated, or re-instated, depending. Hopefully 45 to 19 if Frens are up with me.
I'm not even an American, although I'd like to be, so if I can easily find this stuff why can't the Fake News?
I know it's not required,someone might negotiate that.....
Art of the deal
I rather like the Constitution, it was made to be built upon. If government cannot follow this one what makes anyone think that they are going to follow another? Seriously? Say it isn't so. Not all, anyway. Good foundation. Solid. Sturdy. A lot can be Repealed and Replaced. Anything that contradicts the Constitution or it's supporting documents, Bill of Rights, should be scrapped. Corporations are not people and are under the strict authority of the government to keep it's Masters safe from harm.
His meaning is that fraud nullifies any constitutional steps taken following the fraud. Once the fraud is discovered, any and all steps taken subsequent to and in faith of the fraud can be set aside, so that a new start can take place (a real election, not a faux election). Or, if it is clear that the fraud advantaged one side, grant the outcome to the remaining side.
Thank you!
And what is he basing this stance on? Is there any sort of legal precedent here?
There is the oft- repeated legal principle that "fraud vitiates everything." If fraud is discovered, and important legal consequences had followed from accepting the fraud as truth, then those consequences are nullified as being invalid fruit of the fraud.
We cannot use the Constitution to tie a noose of fraud around our neck, and then jump off the yardarm. We go back to the point of fraud, nullify whatever had proceeded, and re-enact events from that point. It will not be pretty...but executing people for treason will not be pretty, either, and there are plenty on this page that are good with that.
Thanks. Good points.
And all of what you say is basically Constitutional.
Very strongly disagree with this:
"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations and articles, even those found in the Constitution."
Lincoln faced a crisis of similar kind and magnitude. He suspended Habeus Corpus on a limited basis for a relatively short time. He did not "terminate" it.
If Trump has it as a goal, or a necessary step to reestablish our freedoms, to "terminate" the Constitution or major portions of it, and then to remake it in substantial form then I cannot support him or his plan.
The Declaration of Independence is the bedrock of America and of MAGA, and the Constitution is the codification of the principles derived from the Declaration.
These documents are not "sacred". Their principles are the foundations of human liberty. No other system, no other foundation is their equal.
What we are engaged in is a struggle for the preservation of these ideals. To call for the "termination" of these ideals is to turn our idealistic struggle upon itself as its own enemy.
All I can think is that Trump has misspoken himself. As far as I know the DOD Manual of War does not obviate or contradict the Constitution.
So what could he possibly mean by this statement that appears, quite clearly, to be entirely repugnant to the Constitution?
Years ago, Q responded directly to one of my posts that argued that if we lost the Constitution we would lose America with it. Q responded that the Constitution survives.
I do not believe that has changed.
So what does this post of Trump's mean?
This was a response to me.
DeathRayDesigner 1 point 2 hours ago +1 / -0
His meaning is that fraud nullifies any constitutional steps taken following the fraud. Once the fraud is discovered, any and all steps taken subsequent to and in faith of the fraud can be set aside, so that a new start can take place (a real election, not a faux election). Or, if it is clear that the fraud advantaged one side, grant the outcome to the remaining side.
Compare the Presidential Oarh of Office with the notion of "termination" of its Articles -
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Maybe a comm for military is the only way ? Finally ? Maybe ? Just maybe…
Stop dooming. This is all a build up of the eventual return of President Trump or the end of the DNC and the entire Corporation we live in. Then new elections will be held for a majority of Government seats. Not just the Presidency. We are living in what's called the inversion. As Q says, from Dark to Light. This is a classic example of hegelian dialectic. Problem-Reaction-Solution.
Q and the light side are at the end of the day aligned with the enemy/secret societies. The Problem is the Dark side (Cabal, Globalism). Then the Light side is the solution (The Alliance, Patriots). Again as Q says, from Dark to Light.
You think real life is as simple as Star Wars 😂😂😂😂
You’re dumb. Never gonna happen 😂😂😂
Time to friggin wake up and smell the cofeve
Typos matter.
Martial law it sounds like.
But who is going to declare martial law?
The Generals, who lost their President in Jan 2021 but, under the Constitution, retained their CinC even now.
The arrangement, whereby the CinC can directly task the USMC, bypassing Congress, and, upon certain conditions, can deploy National Guards out of States, even globally, is about to freak out the Normies. Can't wait.
https://beckernews.com/148-hunter-biden-suspicious-activity-reports-are-being-hidden-from-americans-by-the-biden-administration-48031/
Sounds like PEADS.
Yup.
Go fuck yourself traitor
Im more American than you, traitor, I live in Alaska one of the freest states and I served in the US Army for 16 years as an 11B, so go fuck your socialist communist bullshit somewhere else. When there is this much election fraud and targeted attacks against Trump, the one true president then the only solution is to toss the constitution, declare martial law, and make trump president for life.
If you can't see that the only place this movement goes is Trump being put in charge for life and tossing the constitution then you haven't been paying any attention at all for the last 6 years.
What the hell do you think Trump and Q have been talking about for the last 6 years? YES WE WANT TRUMP TO BE PRESIDENT FOR LIFE, why the hell are you here if you don't?
President Trump is hinting at multiple scenarios.
There must have been something in the constitution that points in the direction for us to go....
Do they fit the legal definition for a "lawful combatant," or "unlawful combatant?" Asking for a friend.
Sounds like Martial law to meee....
“False” and “Fraudulent” capitalized unnecessarily.
FF… false flag? Keep your eyes open
(also “Elections” but I’m not sure how to interpret that)
I swear to god I'm going to start typing "The Republic Party".
The trump post is referring to when the constitution is suspended, which is only during marshal law, such as when the commander in chief invokes the insurrection act. Holy crap this crowd is getting slow.
Says the guy who doesn't know how to spell martial law...
Ha! You caught it. Congrats. This is an egg to tell me two things, who is paying attention with a linguists brain, and, this indicates you probably are not a bot, as this type of programming for an AI would be tedious and doesn’t produce a result that the left can find a way to use. Only some humans catch a spelling error when words that are pronounced the same, but spelled differently to identify a different meaning.
Thoughts?
You are a moron and are trying to make shit up after getting caught misspelling a word. Do you really expect me to believe that you purposely did it in order to see "who is paying attention with a linguists brain" (what the fuck does that even mean anyway?} and to also try to weed out bots? Please. Honestly dude. Just take the loss, learn from it, and move on. Ultimately no one gives that much of a shit. Just maybe don't call out large numbers of people here as stupid in general.
Ok.
Brilliant!
What will the demoncrats do now? Demanding to uphold all rules, regulations and articles, EVEN THE CONSTITUTION?
I thought they want to overcome the constitution, isn't that funny?
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/12/james-howard-kunstler/hows-the-war-on-truth-going/
I'm thinking he "misused" terminated purposely, to infer the the penalty for such acts.
He’s now saying things out loud now that have been talked about on here for some time. Feels like things are getting closer.
Yes, and why did Trump meet with Kari Lake at Mar-a-Lago last week? Here is a somewhat slanted article about the Trump-Lake meeting, but in the photo, look at Trump's body language. He's leaning in, listening intensely.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/kari-lake-seen-trump-refusing-concede
In the photo is a woman with blond hair (somewhat heavy-set) and a man seated to Kari Lake's right. Could this woman & man have been in the Trump 'calm before the storm' presser back in 2017? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BREos5woyXc
Here is a large photo showing the whole line-up of what Trump says 'The world's great military in this room.'
https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/f02a958f8e3aefc58c09599f576b304b0d6ee476/c=0-105-1023-683/local/-/media/2017/10/05/USATODAY/USATODAY/636428350495854909-calm-2.JPG?width=660&height=373&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp
I always wonder who took the photo?
Repudiative breach.
Fraud vitiates everything.
Before DJT left office he dissolved the federal government and instituted new guard. It was his DUTY.
He also made a post yesterday that said “DO SOMETHING” https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/109446783460038797