Yes but energy is constant and always in perfect God balance there's never more or less it leaves one physical only to be sent to the next hence Buddhists have interpreted this as reincarnation. Your right and wrong
We do go through reincarnation in a way but it's spiritual. All men shall be salted with fire in the worlds to come (spiritual realms). There's also a corrupt and a Godly Universalism.
The Scriptures are clear: All men shall be saved in the FULLNESS of time, each man in his own order. The lake of fire is for correction unto repentance, not destruction without recourse.
Then it just goes to the President pro tempore of the Senate. There is a whole line of succession. If there is no Speaker, it just skips over the Speaker.
On 9/11 terrorists apparently avoided the largest, most significant and symbolic target in Washington, the Capitol Building, and somehow decided to crash into a narrow wedge of the Pentagon, where they were looking for Rumsfeld's missing $2.3 trillion dollars.
The Shanksville PA plane wasn't intended for a field in Shanksville PA. It was headed for the Capitol.
They wanted to take out the seats of power: economic (WTC), military (Pentagon), and govt (Capitol)
Interestingly (and fortunately), bin Laden had nixed the original plan of 10 planes, which would have included LA and the Sears Tower in Chicago, because of overly complicated logistics.
EDIT: If only downvotes could change basic facts...LOL
Except that neither the Speaker nor the President Pro Tempore are constitutionally eligible to ascend to POTUS because neither is an "Officer of the USA."
Doesn't matter what the current succession statute says. It would be unconstitutional. Legally, the next down the list after VP, is Sec of State.
Unfortunately I've heard of that dumb bitch Murray, as she stole the seat from Smiley, for whom I voted. But here in WA, our elections are 100% rigged, at least once you get outside of local races.
Her slogan was “The Mom in Tennis Shoes “. That bit of rhetorical brilliance was enough to elect this do-nothing leftist from WA approximately 100 years ago.
But even if the latest ICBM can enter U.S. airspace, that doesn't mean Pyongyang is capable of striking the world's largest economy with a nuclear weapon.
"We don't know what payload it carries so it's not clear it can carry a nuclear warhead to that range," Wright told CNBC. "The real question is: how small North Korea has made a nuclear warhead and whether it can carry a warhead like that on the missiles it makes."
Seaman mirrored those sentiments, noting that "the precise payload would need to be known to assess the missile's range."
Like I said, if a big boom hits DC, I don’t think regular chain of succession concerns will apply.
Nukes are bullshit. Watch a video demonstration by Galen Winsor. Just search his name on bitchute etc. See what conclusions YOU come to. It's all bs and another black budget revenue stream to continue to rob us and use the proceeds to generate mass fear in perpetuity via ignorance.
As I said above, neither the Speaker nor the President Pro Tempore are constitutionally eligible to ascend to POTUS because neither is an "Officer of the USA."
Doesn't matter what the current succession statute says. It would be unconstitutional. Legally, the next down the list after VP, is Sec of State.
Technically, no party really has a majority, though the Republicans have a plurality. Republicans have (49) compared to Democrats (48) and Independents (3). But the PPT like the Speaker, is elected by the entire body of the Senate, which with the 3 independents caucusing with the Dems, results in the election of a Dem.
But it doesn't really matter anyway, since PPT is not an "Officer of the USA" and thus ineligible to succeed to the presidency. Same goes for Speaker. The next lawful, constitutional officer after VP would be Sec of State.
Nope. Neither Speaker nor President Pro Tempore are eligible under the Constitution, as neither is an "Officer of the USA." Legally, regardless of what the current succession statute says, next constitutional officer down the list is Sec of State.
As I said, it doesn't matter what the current statute says. Under the CONSTITUTION, which supersedes all statute, neither the Speaker nor the PPT are an "Officer of the USA", thus rendering the Sec of State as the next CONSTITUTIONALLY eligible officer on the succession order.
10 DAYS
DAR(NK)ESS
😎
u/#q97
Sorry for the following...kind of. THERE IS NO REINCARNATION......PERIOD.
Yes but energy is constant and always in perfect God balance there's never more or less it leaves one physical only to be sent to the next hence Buddhists have interpreted this as reincarnation. Your right and wrong
We do go through reincarnation in a way but it's spiritual. All men shall be salted with fire in the worlds to come (spiritual realms). There's also a corrupt and a Godly Universalism.
The Scriptures are clear: All men shall be saved in the FULLNESS of time, each man in his own order. The lake of fire is for correction unto repentance, not destruction without recourse.
Nominal Christianity has it wrong. All wrong.
OK, my "condition" causes me to try to figure out what DAR and ESS are when you do stuff like this.
ESS makes me think ES&S Voting system which is the one used by one of the Arizona counties in the news recently. I don't have any thought about DAR.
I think the focus should be on [NK]
I came to this conclusion a number of years ago. It's not Darkness. it's North Korea
Yes, I think the darkness comes from something to do with NK.
It’s from Drop 97:
Annotated version: (tried to link it in a comment above but not sure the image is loading…)
Yeppers, but my "condition" makes me interpret differently, as if the parentheses mean NK is silenced.
Daughters of the American Revolution, DAR Constitution Hall is at 1776 D St NW by White House, fwiw
Maybe another way of saying “Duress”?
https://www.amazon.com/Three-Days-Darnkess-Aitken/dp/1505633400
In the book it refers to hell reigning on earth.
It already is.
Some kind of hell, that's for sure.
Aha~!
Then it just goes to the President pro tempore of the Senate. There is a whole line of succession. If there is no Speaker, it just skips over the Speaker.
If a missile strikes DC and takes out Congress, I think we’ll be in either a Designated Survivor or martial law situation.
We should be so incredibly lucky
On 9/11 terrorists apparently avoided the largest, most significant and symbolic target in Washington, the Capitol Building, and somehow decided to crash into a narrow wedge of the Pentagon, where they were looking for Rumsfeld's missing $2.3 trillion dollars.
riiiight....
The Shanksville PA plane wasn't intended for a field in Shanksville PA. It was headed for the Capitol.
They wanted to take out the seats of power: economic (WTC), military (Pentagon), and govt (Capitol)
Interestingly (and fortunately), bin Laden had nixed the original plan of 10 planes, which would have included LA and the Sears Tower in Chicago, because of overly complicated logistics.
EDIT: If only downvotes could change basic facts...LOL
There was no flight 93.
The 9/11 report claimed it was headed for the white house.
Bin laden? Bro, I thought you were a hip.
There was no 9/11 report.
And bro, I'm not a hip. I'm a kneecap and three toes.
Yes there was the 9/11 Commission report and you just parroted it, nearly verbatim.
debatable...>.>;
Missile is the metaphor. What actually does it is SCOTUS ruling and military. At least, that’s the idea.
I don't trust the SCROTUS.
Me either. But I hope military is pulling their strings.
Works for me!
Tom Clancy scenario.
I get the gist of the designated survivor, but how is that person chosen? Who knows who that person is? Is it rotating? So many questions.
Except that neither the Speaker nor the President Pro Tempore are constitutionally eligible to ascend to POTUS because neither is an "Officer of the USA."
Doesn't matter what the current succession statute says. It would be unconstitutional. Legally, the next down the list after VP, is Sec of State.
Here is the article.
https://archive.is/ZduOK
Thank you! I should’ve checked the archive and just wasn’t thinking.
Additional stage setting regarding North Korea’s nuclear arsenal appears to have occurred in the MSM over the last week or so, too… Five days ago: Kim Jong Un orders ‘exponential’ expansion of North Korea’s nuclear arsenal Other outlets reported similar news stories.
Four days ago: North Korea fires Kim’s No. 2 military official.
Two days ago: South Korea concerned about U.S. protection as North increases missile tests
Yesterday: North Korea's Kim purges ex-foreign minister, South Korean lawmakers say.
This is interesting.....
u/#q282
Wouldn’t you say we’re currently in a state of shutdown?
Indeed
Then it would just go to the person who is third in line for the presidency: the President Pro Tempore of the Senate...
...ladies and gentlemen, I give you Fucking President Patty the Fuck Murray, whom nobody the fuck has ever even heard of.
Unfortunately I've heard of that dumb bitch Murray, as she stole the seat from Smiley, for whom I voted. But here in WA, our elections are 100% rigged, at least once you get outside of local races.
At least since they got rid of Slade
Her slogan was “The Mom in Tennis Shoes “. That bit of rhetorical brilliance was enough to elect this do-nothing leftist from WA approximately 100 years ago.
Wow, she looks great for her age ;)
Yeah, moron libs here are in straight denial now that white females are no longer the token minority and are evil because they're white now.
From a 2017 about NK having a missile that can reach DC:
Like I said, if a big boom hits DC, I don’t think regular chain of succession concerns will apply.
Nukes are bullshit. Watch a video demonstration by Galen Winsor. Just search his name on bitchute etc. See what conclusions YOU come to. It's all bs and another black budget revenue stream to continue to rob us and use the proceeds to generate mass fear in perpetuity via ignorance.
Does that video explain nuclear power?
Yes.
As I said above, neither the Speaker nor the President Pro Tempore are constitutionally eligible to ascend to POTUS because neither is an "Officer of the USA."
Doesn't matter what the current succession statute says. It would be unconstitutional. Legally, the next down the list after VP, is Sec of State.
https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/109642527477366026
Here's an archived copy of the Reuters article. https://archive.ph/ZduOK
No Speaker then would go to the lonest serving Senator being Chuck Grassley of Iowa.
Technically, no party really has a majority, though the Republicans have a plurality. Republicans have (49) compared to Democrats (48) and Independents (3). But the PPT like the Speaker, is elected by the entire body of the Senate, which with the 3 independents caucusing with the Dems, results in the election of a Dem.
But it doesn't really matter anyway, since PPT is not an "Officer of the USA" and thus ineligible to succeed to the presidency. Same goes for Speaker. The next lawful, constitutional officer after VP would be Sec of State.
In that case, President Pro Tempore becomes the POTUS. Currently a Democrat.
Nope. Neither Speaker nor President Pro Tempore are eligible under the Constitution, as neither is an "Officer of the USA." Legally, regardless of what the current succession statute says, next constitutional officer down the list is Sec of State.
Have you ever seen Designated Survivor?
Very interesting but how would this expose Biden's crimes to the left?
Lot of innocent people might die too.
I would ignore the missile context.
The only text in this Q drop is:
Who would be president if no speaker no president no vice president?
Why, PRESIDENT PATTY FUCKING MURRAY, of course!
Constitutionally speaking, Sec of State.
A democrat. Patty Murray. Also, almost every single other Successor would be a Dem. (No Republicans listed) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_line_of_succession
Thanks for sticky, mods!
So, who is next in line after speaker of the house
Senate Pro Tem.
Sec of State. Pro Temp isn't an "Officer of the USA" and thus, not eligible to succeed.
Incorrect. Secretary of State comes after Senate Pro Tem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_line_of_succession#Current_order_of_succession
As I said, it doesn't matter what the current statute says. Under the CONSTITUTION, which supersedes all statute, neither the Speaker nor the PPT are an "Officer of the USA", thus rendering the Sec of State as the next CONSTITUTIONALLY eligible officer on the succession order.
Yeah OK you tell yourself that all you want.
Yeah OK, you should read the Constitution sometime.
Interesting you say that because I literally just did. Would you care to specifically point out where in the document it states what you are claiming?