Hmmmm. And he, Tucker, told us 2 days after the 2020 election that there was no problem. Biden won fair and square. Someone please explain this perverse action.
No, he is not. I figured him out long ago. He is pursuing his own road. So, let him ask questions.
One litmus test remains valid for the time being: Go back in history: 20 years, and watch how they treated Ron Paul.
Then, you know exactly where they stand. Tucker will get there. In a way, you can use him as a gauge, watching the shift materialize .... Patience, my friend.
He was certainly setting his audience up for that over a year ago. I don't trust him at all. He's getting ahead of stuff but has he ever declared 2020 election fraud?
I think he is doing hard news. He is backing up what he is saying with hard evidence. Otherwise he will be cast into the same category as Alex Jones. It is a slower path, but see what he is doing. The normies, like my in-laws, will watch him and things will start clicking for them.
FauxNews bosses, particularly Paul RINO, have influence on what is reported. All of the Faux hosts were given explicit instructions that they were not allowed to question the election results. If they do it, they always toe the line and avoid the key issue which is the Dominion voting machines.
As the direct headlines have revealed specific manipulation and provable corruptios (FBI's meddling, the Twitter files, etc), then Faux has relaxed and allowed that to be part of the narrative. The bomb already went off, so now the hosts have permission to talk about it.
Tucker has gotten increasingly bold though. Perhaps his ratings (and massive ad revenues) are speaking and he's being given more of a leash because it's making them all rich. Perhaps someone's had a private conversation with some of the decision makers there about just how much they're going to limit things before their own personal skeletons fall out of the closets? We can speculate. I have no evidence of any of that. But something is changing. Slowly, but changing.
I didn't need to get anything from Sidney Powell. The steal was so obvious, so blatant, so provable, only an idiot or a co-conspirator couldn't see it.
Aliens are going to be a huge distraction you can see it start ramping up, they'll say Jesus was an alien. I hope Tucker isnt just a sleeper for that nonsense, I really like what he's been doing
Most likely Tucker's contract imposes certain limitations to what he can say. Albeit, it appears of any 'talking head', Carlson has negotiated one of the best contracts. I just questioned Tucker's repeated use of 'democracy'. Have you noticed how much the word is used by pundits and politicians alike? Carlson must have been told to never use the correct word 'Republic' because he never seems to use it. I wonder why? The word 'democracy' is offensive to me. When I hear republicans and democrats alike, along with Klaus Schwab saying-- "Saving our democracy", it tells me this word is intended to be a trip word like the polka dotted dress Sirhan Sirhan saw. It is a loaded word.
I just heard last night Tucker saying Republic a couple of times in his interview with William J Kelly on Fox Nation so maybe he is just caught up in the verbage that is used so often these days. I technically know we don't live in a "democracy" but still call it that sometimes.
I think it is easy to see, the white hats are in control. Tucker was shown where the movie is going, was offered a role in the movie, and chose wisely.
Although Nixon wasn’t some hero- he took us off the gold standard , and completely corporatized healthcare . If he knew who shot JFK he could have said so a little sooner. Can’t believe he was outed like that though. Watergate was already a nothing-burger , now I realize it’s not even true. Holy f@k.
I believe Cathy O’brien’s story ( it’s on bitchute , etc). She was MK ultraed into sexual slavery at the age of 9 and sold to Gerald Ford. He was an evil pedophile.
Nixon was subjected to a lot of what Trump was subjected to. The attacks were nonstop. Every minute of every news broadcast was focused on evil Nixon. He was surviving until Butterfield exposed the existence of the tapes, which Nixon didn't burn. If you were playing by the rules and expected everyone else was, Nixon didn't have a chance.
Cathy O'Brien says some outrageous but powerful stuff.
It's hard not to believe her... I have scarcely seen anyone telling whoppers THAT BIG be able to have body language like hers, if she were lying. She's either a rare mentally ill person who is also a savant at fabricating huge stories or she's not bullshitting.
What I find interesting is how these people Like Nixon, Reagan relate to Ron Paul. They encouraged him to go to Washington. And he was nicknamed: Dr. No, because he shot down everything not in line with the Constitution.
To quote Tucker: See how that works?
From this I surmize that these guys like Nixon understood how the game is played in " Permanent Washington" all to well. To be on the receiving end of this stick, to have your bubble burst and concluding that while you were said to be the most powerfulman man on earth due to the position of Potus, in effect, you are not, and being able to see what exactly this means without the power to change it, is quite humbling.
JFK was shot for a reason.
Nixon was replaced for a reason.
Reagan was shot for a reason.
Trump was resisted for a reason.
And this reason, as Q so nicely quibbed: Clowns in America.
One of the things people fail to realize about Nixon as well is he had the perpetual headwinds of a strongly liberal Congress blocking his every move. They were still in the Great Society hyperspending mode when he was elected in 1968. I read his memoirs, and a lot of times he confided that he tried to minimize damage by signing the least damaging bills when congress had solid veto override support for things he did not want to sign.
This is a big wake up call for people in my age range and older. The normies in this demographic tend to watch a lot of Fox News and collectively hold a lot of the wealth of this nation.
Kennedy happened a couple years before I was born but that subject too, is piercing the veil for our senior population. Now do Vietnam (Gulf of Tonkin), Iran Contra, John Hinckley, Jr., S&L scandal, Enron. All this leads to 9/11 which itself leads to all the FFs like Sandy Hook, Pulse, LV.
I'm not trying to say WWII was really justified, but we never should have sent anyone anywhere after that clusterfuck. Vietnam, Korea, Panama, fucking Mogadishu, why?
I saw an old video of Gerald Ford speaking to scientists at the Univ. of Nebraska telling them that GMO food production was a go. This was before the youtube purge. Ford was a bad actor.
At the time, I never would have thought that GMO food went back to the 60's or 70's in study up to production. If I hadn't heard that man say the words he said. I would never have believed it. Now I understand that these things that are being thrown (randomly) into our lives are decades in the making. Truly nothing is coincidence.
Why does Tucker Carlson use the word 'democracy'? This is the word used by globalists. It doesn't really mean republic at all. It pretends to address it though, when in reality it refers to any other political ideology. Communism? Fascism? Socialism? Yes. Yes and Yes. 'Democracy' is most definitely used to address those ideologies. This is why Klaus Schwab can talk about 'saving our democracy' when he is really talking about a Chinese totalitarian system imposed on all of us. It's 'democracy', ya' know!
Sorry about that guys. I didn't create the clip. The post that is stickied has the extra five words that got cut out in the last two seconds and that I included in my title anyway since its SOOOO important to you 🤣😂
If I had used that clip people would've given me shit for giving Faux the extra views 🙄
Hmmmm. And he, Tucker, told us 2 days after the 2020 election that there was no problem. Biden won fair and square. Someone please explain this perverse action.
I agree.... I wrote him, Hannity, and Ingraham off after 2020 because they didn't support Trump.
Tucker is an enigma
No, he is not. I figured him out long ago. He is pursuing his own road. So, let him ask questions.
One litmus test remains valid for the time being: Go back in history: 20 years, and watch how they treated Ron Paul.
Then, you know exactly where they stand. Tucker will get there. In a way, you can use him as a gauge, watching the shift materialize .... Patience, my friend.
Oh I like him and I believe what he's doing now is sincere. It's what he did immediately after the stolen election in 2020 that is perplexing....
His hands were clearly tied by Fox at that time and it was frustrating to watch. Luckily that has since changed and he’s been on fire lately.
I think Tucker is going to fall for the alien delusion.
He was certainly setting his audience up for that over a year ago. I don't trust him at all. He's getting ahead of stuff but has he ever declared 2020 election fraud?
Yes, he's said so. Same with 2022.
I watch it nightly and he routinely (lately) makes comments about the ‘20 election fraud.
I think he is doing hard news. He is backing up what he is saying with hard evidence. Otherwise he will be cast into the same category as Alex Jones. It is a slower path, but see what he is doing. The normies, like my in-laws, will watch him and things will start clicking for them.
FauxNews bosses, particularly Paul RINO, have influence on what is reported. All of the Faux hosts were given explicit instructions that they were not allowed to question the election results. If they do it, they always toe the line and avoid the key issue which is the Dominion voting machines.
As the direct headlines have revealed specific manipulation and provable corruptios (FBI's meddling, the Twitter files, etc), then Faux has relaxed and allowed that to be part of the narrative. The bomb already went off, so now the hosts have permission to talk about it.
Tucker has gotten increasingly bold though. Perhaps his ratings (and massive ad revenues) are speaking and he's being given more of a leash because it's making them all rich. Perhaps someone's had a private conversation with some of the decision makers there about just how much they're going to limit things before their own personal skeletons fall out of the closets? We can speculate. I have no evidence of any of that. But something is changing. Slowly, but changing.
He addressed his himself during an hour-long interview.
Yet, he has a family show on Fox. It is a show. Assigning more value to it than that is ....eh ... the smartest thing you can do. [/s]
So true. Well put.
As I recall he was trying to get info from Sidney Powell, who refused to give him the info. I could be wrong
I didn't need to get anything from Sidney Powell. The steal was so obvious, so blatant, so provable, only an idiot or a co-conspirator couldn't see it.
Exactly. And Tucker pushed that tic-tac video nonsense, which was an obvious distraction from a whole host of issues.
Aliens are going to be a huge distraction you can see it start ramping up, they'll say Jesus was an alien. I hope Tucker isnt just a sleeper for that nonsense, I really like what he's been doing
Thank you.
Most likely Tucker's contract imposes certain limitations to what he can say. Albeit, it appears of any 'talking head', Carlson has negotiated one of the best contracts. I just questioned Tucker's repeated use of 'democracy'. Have you noticed how much the word is used by pundits and politicians alike? Carlson must have been told to never use the correct word 'Republic' because he never seems to use it. I wonder why? The word 'democracy' is offensive to me. When I hear republicans and democrats alike, along with Klaus Schwab saying-- "Saving our democracy", it tells me this word is intended to be a trip word like the polka dotted dress Sirhan Sirhan saw. It is a loaded word.
I just heard last night Tucker saying Republic a couple of times in his interview with William J Kelly on Fox Nation so maybe he is just caught up in the verbage that is used so often these days. I technically know we don't live in a "democracy" but still call it that sometimes.
That's a good thing and news to me. I wish he'd use it all the time.
Yup. A democracy is like two wolves and a sheep discussing what they are having for dinner.
I think it is easy to see, the white hats are in control. Tucker was shown where the movie is going, was offered a role in the movie, and chose wisely.
Although Nixon wasn’t some hero- he took us off the gold standard , and completely corporatized healthcare . If he knew who shot JFK he could have said so a little sooner. Can’t believe he was outed like that though. Watergate was already a nothing-burger , now I realize it’s not even true. Holy f@k. I believe Cathy O’brien’s story ( it’s on bitchute , etc). She was MK ultraed into sexual slavery at the age of 9 and sold to Gerald Ford. He was an evil pedophile.
Nixon was subjected to a lot of what Trump was subjected to. The attacks were nonstop. Every minute of every news broadcast was focused on evil Nixon. He was surviving until Butterfield exposed the existence of the tapes, which Nixon didn't burn. If you were playing by the rules and expected everyone else was, Nixon didn't have a chance.
Cathy O'Brien says some outrageous but powerful stuff.
It's hard not to believe her... I have scarcely seen anyone telling whoppers THAT BIG be able to have body language like hers, if she were lying. She's either a rare mentally ill person who is also a savant at fabricating huge stories or she's not bullshitting.
Either way it's pretty terrifying.
Yes indeed he did. He is the figurehead.
What I find interesting is how these people Like Nixon, Reagan relate to Ron Paul. They encouraged him to go to Washington. And he was nicknamed: Dr. No, because he shot down everything not in line with the Constitution.
To quote Tucker: See how that works?
From this I surmize that these guys like Nixon understood how the game is played in " Permanent Washington" all to well. To be on the receiving end of this stick, to have your bubble burst and concluding that while you were said to be the most powerfulman man on earth due to the position of Potus, in effect, you are not, and being able to see what exactly this means without the power to change it, is quite humbling.
JFK was shot for a reason.
Nixon was replaced for a reason.
Reagan was shot for a reason.
Trump was resisted for a reason.
And this reason, as Q so nicely quibbed: Clowns in America.
One of the things people fail to realize about Nixon as well is he had the perpetual headwinds of a strongly liberal Congress blocking his every move. They were still in the Great Society hyperspending mode when he was elected in 1968. I read his memoirs, and a lot of times he confided that he tried to minimize damage by signing the least damaging bills when congress had solid veto override support for things he did not want to sign.
You misunderstood what Nixon did relative to the golf exchange window.
sad mid life crisis sports car...HAHAHAHAHA
WOW.
This is a big wake up call for people in my age range and older. The normies in this demographic tend to watch a lot of Fox News and collectively hold a lot of the wealth of this nation.
Kennedy happened a couple years before I was born but that subject too, is piercing the veil for our senior population. Now do Vietnam (Gulf of Tonkin), Iran Contra, John Hinckley, Jr., S&L scandal, Enron. All this leads to 9/11 which itself leads to all the FFs like Sandy Hook, Pulse, LV.
I'm not trying to say WWII was really justified, but we never should have sent anyone anywhere after that clusterfuck. Vietnam, Korea, Panama, fucking Mogadishu, why?
I saw an old video of Gerald Ford speaking to scientists at the Univ. of Nebraska telling them that GMO food production was a go. This was before the youtube purge. Ford was a bad actor.
I would love to see this
At the time, I never would have thought that GMO food went back to the 60's or 70's in study up to production. If I hadn't heard that man say the words he said. I would never have believed it. Now I understand that these things that are being thrown (randomly) into our lives are decades in the making. Truly nothing is coincidence.
Why does Tucker Carlson use the word 'democracy'? This is the word used by globalists. It doesn't really mean republic at all. It pretends to address it though, when in reality it refers to any other political ideology. Communism? Fascism? Socialism? Yes. Yes and Yes. 'Democracy' is most definitely used to address those ideologies. This is why Klaus Schwab can talk about 'saving our democracy' when he is really talking about a Chinese totalitarian system imposed on all of us. It's 'democracy', ya' know!
I know that the Carter administration is universally disliked around here, but Jimmy Carter was ousted by the Deep State for the same reasons.
Sorry about that guys. I didn't create the clip. The post that is stickied has the extra five words that got cut out in the last two seconds and that I included in my title anyway since its SOOOO important to you 🤣😂
If I had used that clip people would've given me shit for giving Faux the extra views 🙄