So primitive savages doing something awful somehow justifies doing it now? The fuck kind of retarded logic is that?
Primitive people also raped, killed, and literally ate each other on a fairly regular basis, should we campaign for that too? How about ritual human sacrifice? Oh wait, these people love all that shit because they're deranged lunatics.
July 3, 1933. Over 100,000 Jews gather at Soldier Field in Chicago to celebrate 3,000 years of Jewish history and nationhood by worshipping a fire-breathing statue of Moloch and feeding it children which we can only hope were not real.
If a primitive society did what she described, it would end in 1 or 2 generations at most. She's describing what they want our society to become. And were it to become that, it would also end in a few generations.
A simple example to illustrate my point: Let's consider a society that kills every baby born. That society will go extinct within 1 generation. What Anna Brees described here is not far off. What this would do to all the girls growing up in that society would be beyond horrendous. They would either group together and force it to stop or start having serious mental issues that could start resulting in mass suicides. I also suspect that most of them would probably block the memory of the event from their brains entirely, it would be that traumatic. However, their mental state would not be fixed by supressing the memory. They would still be very traumatized but not know why, until they see it happen again to another girl and be reminded of it. They would be re-victimized every time another girl was forced to go through this insane ritual by having their memory jogged of theirs. The level of this depravity makes me think Anna Brees is making this up. No society could be this depraved and survive.
What is truth to you in your society is not truth to anothers.”
Bullshit. Truth is truth no matter who acknowledges.
The truth is that the twelve year old girl would have used up her emotionally bonding hormones on men who have no interest in a monogamous relationship with her. The growing brain of a baby in her preteen womb would’ve competed with her own still-developing brain for nutrients, possibly resulting in less than ideal IQ for both. Her children would’ve grown up bastards with little social cohesiveness. The society was probably focused on primitive tribal warfare rather than science and art.
She was raped by every pervert in her society because that society hated women. To the point they were not faithful to their wives nor were they concerned about the child. Only their own self lusts. This woman is sick!
I'm familiar with this type of argument. Back in the early 90s, when I was adjacent to our local arts community, the local free paper ran articles talking about similar tribes, only they were discussing what happened to the boys when they hit puberty. The boys had to perform fellatio on all the older men of the tribe as part of the ritual (and I honestly can't believe I'm writing about this online. Ugh.)
My point being - a certain percentage of gay males in the arts community were really big on the idea of being able to mess around with young boys and were using this sort of thing as "justification" that it was okay for them to do it.
And I'll just close this by saying that here's a modern woman with all the conveniences of the modern world - including the phone she's using to post this crap - talking about how great "primitve" societies are.
I had an old Italian bricklayer tell me that as a kid, other older kids would hold them down and stuff their foreskin full of sand.
They would then jack them off - to what extent I don’t know but I stopped listening after that.
Learnt is the past tense of the verb to learn in English. In American it's spelt "learned" (and this variant is also used in Britain - it's optional). Curiously, "earnt" isn't a recognised spelling in either language.
Better the goats than the messed-up scenario being described in this tweet. Better these people have sex with a million goats than was described by Anna Brees in this tweet.
In general, cultures evolve and improve over time. Many start as very primitive groups with very raw practices. And for example, just because the Mayans cut out living hearts from a sacrifice on an altar doesn't mean all cultures have to accept such practices.
Well, what I really meant to say, Anna, is fuck you, you dumb bitch. That's acceptable to say in my culture and I insist you accept it too.
This woman is an airhead. She needs to watch Keep Sweet: Pray and Obey. That there is a modern example of her idiotic comparison and guess what? The FLDS handbook allowed polygamy and marriage to multiple young brides, but that radical ideology does not make it OK. Just because some dorky pedo poser prophet and his cult consented to sexual acts with 12-year-old girls does not make it acceptable. Many women's lives were destroyed at a young age because of their sick, "heavenly" prophet's commandments.
Truth is universal - Sorry Fool. Was she celebrating? OR was this a Male Dominated event with NO CONSENT?!
I'd bet my stash that you will be the same type of ideologue that condemns Christianity, which brought us this:
1 Cor 7:3
The husband must fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband.
NOTE THE EVEN _ HANDED DUTY!
1Co 7:4
The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does; and likewise also the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does.
Anna....bitch, you just got through saying it was PRIMITIVE society where every guy in the village banged a 12-year-old girl. PRIMITIVE SAVAGES did this.
You don't think civilized western cultures have advanced beyond primitive ones in any way? Then what was the point of becoming civilized...and creating institutions of higher learning, where you got your anthropology degree?
Either Anna Brees is making a really dark joke, trolling us or outright lying.
For a society to survive long term, it has to be subject to natural law and human nature. What Anna Brees describes here is against both. Anyone that knows normal women, knows that it is in their nature to be very protective about their bodily autonomy and that they are very selective about who they even consider as intimate partners. To force this kind of scenario on them would be extremely traumatizing and destructive. No amount of brainwashing would ever convince them that what is happening to them is normal.
What this description reads like to me is what the deep state pedos want our society to become and to some extent, we might be on the way there. I can't imagine more degeneracy and destruction of the human soul than what Anna Brees described here and that's exactly what they want.
Another possibility is that she is describing a horrendous pedo sex cult. The difference between that and a society is that the cult of this type isn't self sustaining. It has to latch onto a functioning society for a fresh supply of victims. However, it otherwise doesn't in any way contribute to the growth of the society it attaches to. In fact, by destroying the victims it steals from the functioning society, it actually slows or stops the development and growth of any such society.
Okay, let's play the social relativity game she calls for. In our culture, men and women marry each other, not men and men or women and animals. They fight tooth and nail to oppose it.
In our culture, God is our only king and all mortals are socially equal, including members of government. They sure don't like that one, either.
What makes the devil dangerous is that he comes close to the truth. What she says about cultures holding different beliefs and values is true. What she leaves out is that there are fundamental, eternal rights we hold independent of culture, such as our own lives and our own liberty.
So primitive savages doing something awful somehow justifies doing it now? The fuck kind of retarded logic is that?
Primitive people also raped, killed, and literally ate each other on a fairly regular basis, should we campaign for that too? How about ritual human sacrifice? Oh wait, these people love all that shit because they're deranged lunatics.
<abortion has entered the chat>
<vaccines have entered the chat>
<........... has entered the chat>
<Moloch........>
July 3, 1933. Over 100,000 Jews gather at Soldier Field in Chicago to celebrate 3,000 years of Jewish history and nationhood by worshipping a fire-breathing statue of Moloch and feeding it children which we can only hope were not real.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NoBfV1UOPOh1/
Armie Hammer has entered the chat.
If a primitive society did what she described, it would end in 1 or 2 generations at most. She's describing what they want our society to become. And were it to become that, it would also end in a few generations.
A simple example to illustrate my point: Let's consider a society that kills every baby born. That society will go extinct within 1 generation. What Anna Brees described here is not far off. What this would do to all the girls growing up in that society would be beyond horrendous. They would either group together and force it to stop or start having serious mental issues that could start resulting in mass suicides. I also suspect that most of them would probably block the memory of the event from their brains entirely, it would be that traumatic. However, their mental state would not be fixed by supressing the memory. They would still be very traumatized but not know why, until they see it happen again to another girl and be reminded of it. They would be re-victimized every time another girl was forced to go through this insane ritual by having their memory jogged of theirs. The level of this depravity makes me think Anna Brees is making this up. No society could be this depraved and survive.
Bullshit. Truth is truth no matter who acknowledges.
The truth is that the twelve year old girl would have used up her emotionally bonding hormones on men who have no interest in a monogamous relationship with her. The growing brain of a baby in her preteen womb would’ve competed with her own still-developing brain for nutrients, possibly resulting in less than ideal IQ for both. Her children would’ve grown up bastards with little social cohesiveness. The society was probably focused on primitive tribal warfare rather than science and art.
I learnt something today. Her degree is shit.
Sounds like you learned more than she did
LOL!
Exactly. What is described there is the way animals live.
We are supposed to be human beings with better ideas. Not animals who only respond to hormones.
Them: male dogs hump each other it must be ok!
Us: the one dog is asserting control and dominance, aka rape
She was raped by every pervert in her society because that society hated women. To the point they were not faithful to their wives nor were they concerned about the child. Only their own self lusts. This woman is sick!
The 12 year old girl wasn't "celebrating her womanhood", the men raping her were.
I'm familiar with this type of argument. Back in the early 90s, when I was adjacent to our local arts community, the local free paper ran articles talking about similar tribes, only they were discussing what happened to the boys when they hit puberty. The boys had to perform fellatio on all the older men of the tribe as part of the ritual (and I honestly can't believe I'm writing about this online. Ugh.)
My point being - a certain percentage of gay males in the arts community were really big on the idea of being able to mess around with young boys and were using this sort of thing as "justification" that it was okay for them to do it.
And I'll just close this by saying that here's a modern woman with all the conveniences of the modern world - including the phone she's using to post this crap - talking about how great "primitve" societies are.
I had an old Italian bricklayer tell me that as a kid, other older kids would hold them down and stuff their foreskin full of sand. They would then jack them off - to what extent I don’t know but I stopped listening after that.
learnt? I guess she earnt her anthropology degree.
Learnt is the past tense of the verb to learn in English. In American it's spelt "learned" (and this variant is also used in Britain - it's optional). Curiously, "earnt" isn't a recognised spelling in either language.
I can't find the screencapped tweet on her account.
So either it's not real, or the backlash was so massive that she deleted it.
I'm leaning the latter. These people are sick.
Dear Dumb Cunt,
There is a reason that society does not exist anymore, and most likely got wiped off the face of the Earth.
That's why all those "cultures" got colonized, because they do shit like that right there
So I take it Anna Brees would would be ok with someone cutting out her still beating heart with an obsidian knife? Asking for a friend.
Or being totally subservient to her assigned husband? How about having her clitoris surgically removed - it's never too late...
Does she even consider the ramifications of what she suggests when she vomits her supposed wisdom out?
... and afghans have sex with goats. I'm pretty sure the goats aren't happy about it.
Better the goats than the messed-up scenario being described in this tweet. Better these people have sex with a million goats than was described by Anna Brees in this tweet.
Whatever you do, don't do any research into bacha bazi.
I call BS on her example.
It sounds to me like she read the "Clan of the Cave Bear" series of books instead of getting a degree.
You sure SHE was celebrating??
In general, cultures evolve and improve over time. Many start as very primitive groups with very raw practices. And for example, just because the Mayans cut out living hearts from a sacrifice on an altar doesn't mean all cultures have to accept such practices.
Well, what I really meant to say, Anna, is fuck you, you dumb bitch. That's acceptable to say in my culture and I insist you accept it too.
Over educated idiot.
She couldn't pour piss out of a boot with instructions written on the heel.
A child has the right to be a child.
A child has the right to be left alone to be just that.
A child has the right to not have their childhood ruined or accelerated by an outside manipulator.
Bedrock ~{°¡°}~
This woman is an airhead. She needs to watch Keep Sweet: Pray and Obey. That there is a modern example of her idiotic comparison and guess what? The FLDS handbook allowed polygamy and marriage to multiple young brides, but that radical ideology does not make it OK. Just because some dorky pedo poser prophet and his cult consented to sexual acts with 12-year-old girls does not make it acceptable. Many women's lives were destroyed at a young age because of their sick, "heavenly" prophet's commandments.
Hunter wants to know how old her daughter is... /sarc>
Hey Anna,
Tell us again why you look down on rural Southerners?
Truth is universal - Sorry Fool. Was she celebrating? OR was this a Male Dominated event with NO CONSENT?!
I'd bet my stash that you will be the same type of ideologue that condemns Christianity, which brought us this:
1 Cor 7:3 The husband must fulfill his duty to his wife, and likewise also the wife to her husband. NOTE THE EVEN _ HANDED DUTY!
1Co 7:4
The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does; and likewise also the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does.
Well ma'am we live in a CIVILIZED society not a PRIMITIVE one.
Anna....bitch, you just got through saying it was PRIMITIVE society where every guy in the village banged a 12-year-old girl. PRIMITIVE SAVAGES did this.
You don't think civilized western cultures have advanced beyond primitive ones in any way? Then what was the point of becoming civilized...and creating institutions of higher learning, where you got your anthropology degree?
None, right? Ya dopey, cloth-eared bint?
That's some serious cognitive dissonance to offer up that defense while also presumably supporting the whole #MeToo thing.
Either Anna Brees is making a really dark joke, trolling us or outright lying.
For a society to survive long term, it has to be subject to natural law and human nature. What Anna Brees describes here is against both. Anyone that knows normal women, knows that it is in their nature to be very protective about their bodily autonomy and that they are very selective about who they even consider as intimate partners. To force this kind of scenario on them would be extremely traumatizing and destructive. No amount of brainwashing would ever convince them that what is happening to them is normal.
What this description reads like to me is what the deep state pedos want our society to become and to some extent, we might be on the way there. I can't imagine more degeneracy and destruction of the human soul than what Anna Brees described here and that's exactly what they want.
Another possibility is that she is describing a horrendous pedo sex cult. The difference between that and a society is that the cult of this type isn't self sustaining. It has to latch onto a functioning society for a fresh supply of victims. However, it otherwise doesn't in any way contribute to the growth of the society it attaches to. In fact, by destroying the victims it steals from the functioning society, it actually slows or stops the development and growth of any such society.
We've come along way since then..we don't tolerate that shit now .that's all the difference I see..
Okay, let's play the social relativity game she calls for. In our culture, men and women marry each other, not men and men or women and animals. They fight tooth and nail to oppose it.
In our culture, God is our only king and all mortals are socially equal, including members of government. They sure don't like that one, either.
What makes the devil dangerous is that he comes close to the truth. What she says about cultures holding different beliefs and values is true. What she leaves out is that there are fundamental, eternal rights we hold independent of culture, such as our own lives and our own liberty.
And they wipe their ass with their hands, too.
Does this mean that pushing gays off rooftops is back again on the menu?