Two things covered in this that I find strangely fascinating:
The MSM asks President Trump about Q in a way that immediately provides him plausible deniability because they ask about QAnon. Why? Is their focus so strongly on discrediting Q and the Anons? So strongly that they give up the chance to put President Trump on the spot by asking about Q directly?
Jan Halper-Hayes is ignored by the U.S. media. Why aren’t they proclaiming her a QAnon obsessed Trump associate? And, why have we never heard of her before? That strikes me as very weird. I know POTUS posted a truth saying she’s great. But, I still get a weird vibe from her.
Jan Halper-Hayes "MIGHT" have a "weird vibe" BUT she is NOW on the CHESS BOARD and has spoken, IN public venues, that would NOT usually been seen but she has the authority AND knowledge of WHAT the OPERATION IS...TO BANKRUPT the DEEP STATE...AND that is what PDJT is doing. This is a 3-PRONG attack on the Deep State. 1) The MONEY...having the Vatican give us OUR GOLD BACK...ALL 650 PLANE LOADS OF IT...2) Having the 2020 "monitored" and evidence gathered---BALL BUSTER WHICH means the SOS and AG of those states are in some VERY DEEP kimchi...3) Having ENOUGH Americans wake the HELL up as too what is going on in front of their eyes since Obama rescinded the Executive Order on Propaganda Transmission to the American populace.
Having the US media ignore her is ACTUALLY a good thing because she goes on public channels that ordinary people may not visit...Once the populace "hears" ABOUT her...that will change...it takes time to bring the populace up to notch but PDJT has faith in her and the mission assigned to her is his choice...
It wasn't an EO. He signed it into law. H.R. 4310, Jan 2, 2013
"said it allowed the material produced by the State Department and the Pentagon to strike the ban that had been in place on domestic dissemination of propaganda. In layman’s terms the news media/government can broadcast propaganda to the American people as they please."
It's not about regular news media. It only applies to media produced by the BBG, which I just learned is now called The U.S. Agency for Global Media. This are the folks who produce Radio Free Europe and other stuff for outside the US.
This law lets people REQUEST shows/articles they produce. Previously you couldn't even FOIA this.
This material was already available on the web. Here's the Radio Free Europe Website's top story today. It's stuff very few Americans actually see this stuff.
The law also explicitly prohibits "influencing" inside the US.
No funds authorized to be appropriated to the Department of State or the Broadcasting Board of Governors shall be used to influence public opinion in the United States.
I think one of the reasons they created this law was the BBG was one of the few places Somalis could get accurate news about Somalia. But the Somali immigrants in the US could not access that info.
I remember a lot of controversy over this, but I don't think it's affect folks realy since thn.
As someone who was not pay attention to all this back in 2012/2013, my own knowledge is somewhat limited.
I do believe the State Department holds great sway on what the news media reports. (Look at the recent Tucker clip saying the media disnt report Obama as gay, just to keep their access, as an example) I do not, for one second believe, no funds have been spent to influence the American public
I also look to Q post #4008 and the "U.S. Government Counterinsurgency Guide" which lists propaganda as
"a key element of persuasion and is used at the local, national
and often international levels to influence perceptions of potential supporters, opinion leaders, and opponents in the favor of the insurgents; promoting the
insurgent cause and diminishing the government’s resolve"
Can't believe they wouldn't turn this on the America. The media lies everyday and has only gotten worse the past decade
I do believe the State Department holds great sway on what the news media reports. (Look at the recent Tucker clip saying the media disnt report Obama as gay, just to keep their access, as an example)
I wouldn't use Tucker as an example and if we did that has nothing to do with State Department at all.
I do not, for one second believe, no funds have been spent to influence the American public
How much Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty content have you seen in the past decade? How much Radio Free Asia?
This just means the State Department was going to continue it's normal work funding it's normal meedia sites through the U.S. Agency for Global Media. USAGM's mission
to inform, engage, and connect people around the world in support of freedom and democracy. USAGM accomplishes this mission through two federal entities: the Voice of America (VOA) and the Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB); and four USAGM-funded grantees: Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), Radio Free Asia (RFA), the Middle East Broadcasting Networks (MBN), and the Open Technology Fund (OTF).
No President writes Executive Orders. They sign them so they can executed, but staff lawyers write these things. Sometimes they write an executive order because Congress passed a law they had to follow.
The famous executive order about human rights and corrupt actors that Trump signed in 2017 is because of 2016 law.
New Executive Order Implements Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, Provides for Treasury Sanctions Against Malign Actors Worldwide
Today, the Trump Administration launched a new sanctions regime targeting human rights abusers and corrupt actors around the world. Building on the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act passed by Congress last year, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order (Order) today declaring a ......
650 million is not very much money. It's a little over half a billion. Chump change in the world of national economics. I do not think that this number is correct at all.
I confess to being jaded. Way too many people have come and gone who portrayed themselves as having inside knowledge. So, I can hope she is a messenger sent to signal we are in the end game, but I’ll only be comfortable with that when this is over, when the future proves the past.
I remember a few years ago some body saying a way to check for fake news is does it get you excited? Fudging the facts or outright lying to either get you riled up or tell you exactly what you want to hear is a way to go viral and get clicks or clout.
So the second way is if this isn't from a solid source, is anyone else reporting this? (Still could be fake because they could all be relying on the same original source.)
Halper-Hayes... any relation to Stefan Halper, the fat deepstate professor dude (American but based in UK, I think) paid by Obama's Pentagon, who helped to entrap George Papadopoulos in the London cigar bar?
She sounds like she reading a checklist of items from a discussion on this board...suspicious, but then again, Trump did the Truth post about her. I sure hope she's the real deal!
Corsi and his bullshit. To even think out of the blue they asked Trump in like 2015 is ridiculous. He was twttin' comms back in 2008 about this shit. This whole thing has been a plan for at least 25 years.
I personally HATE the idea of him becoming third in line and impeaching Biden and Harris. That looks like a dictator move. Prove the damn election was stolen and punish those that stole it so it NEVER happens again. Doing it the way she is saying would only embolden the left. We want justice. We want it proven they are all liars and thieves. We want them ALL exposed so anyone within a mile of center left will never have anything to do with Democrats and the media again.
I can not stress how much I hate the idea of him getting in the way she said.
Yeah, the idea of making him "Speaker of the House" so he can be 2nd in line for the presidency is as dippy as they come IMHO. He doesn't want to be 2nd or 1st in line waiting for the presidency; he's the president.
I like the idea of being straightforward, not doing what would only be perceived as a bizarre stunt by a guy who can't get elected, to go around the normal processes of govt—a dic(tator) move.
It's tough to keep waiting, but there are certainly many connections that the military and Trump are running something to expose the deep state. Perhaps Trumps first presidency was setting the stage and was too soon to take them down? Perhaps we needed to really expose Biden and the corrupt deep state behind him by giving Biden the win? There are a lot of variables and what ifs. I do enjoy these kinds of posts because it does detail that there is a chance the good people are trying to do something. Time will tell, but good golly it will be something else if these people do finally get arrested. It's been 8-9 years since Trump came down the elevator. Hard to believe it's been that long already. It's gonna be a tough year leading up to the election so just try to not get burnt out with everything coming...
Perhaps Trumps first presidency was setting the stage and was too soon to take them down?
That is very likely the case.
Just think about how far we have come since Trump showed up.
In my own circles, I was the ONLY one saying in 2015/2016 that corruption was the #1 problem that needed to be solved, and everything else (tax policy, border policy, etc.) meant nothing if the corruption was not dealt with.
Even I did not realize just how deep it went.
But nobody else I knew could even understand what I was saying.
Fast forward to now:
Most people do NOT trust the big corporate media.
Most people do NOT trust the medical cartel.
Most people do NOT think that Democrat/Biden policies are a good thing, and can see that disgusting tranny stuff and all the other anti-American narratives being forced on the public.
Maybe people don't quite have a handle on what exactly to think, but they now KNOW that something is wrong. That was not the case in 2015/2016.
If Trump went after Hillary, they would have had to deal with corrupt judges, corrupt prosecutors who would throw the case in her favor, corrupt Congress who might have removed him from office, corrupt adminstration cabinet who might have removed him from office, corrupt media who would have spun it all and the public who was still duped by the media.
The psychology of the people has changed dramatically from then to now. A lot of people here have a hard time seeing it because we have been awake a long time, and it feels like it is just dragging out and will never really get resolved.
But you do have to set the stage before the show can begin.
What seems to be interesting is that Obama never left and is running a shadow presidency with Joe as the face of it.
Trump never left either, and is running a shadow presidency with Joe as the face of it.
No wonder Joe is shot, he's taking orders and being controlled by two divergent entities. The reason he is always back home or on vacation is probably to minimize how much white hats can use him for their purposes. The blackhats shove him in his home and tell him to just shut up.
I kinda feel like she has just been redpilled, and is awake. And is now speaking everything she has heard. Some may be true, some not, some in question. But she’s going all in on Anon style info. That’s always a bit dangerous when your being served the whole plate and then start to talk about it. You may get a lot wrong. Or in a wrong order.
Or she knows exactly what’s she saying and like omgwtfbbq!
Two things covered in this that I find strangely fascinating:
The MSM asks President Trump about Q in a way that immediately provides him plausible deniability because they ask about QAnon. Why? Is their focus so strongly on discrediting Q and the Anons? So strongly that they give up the chance to put President Trump on the spot by asking about Q directly?
Jan Halper-Hayes is ignored by the U.S. media. Why aren’t they proclaiming her a QAnon obsessed Trump associate? And, why have we never heard of her before? That strikes me as very weird. I know POTUS posted a truth saying she’s great. But, I still get a weird vibe from her.
Jan Halper-Hayes "MIGHT" have a "weird vibe" BUT she is NOW on the CHESS BOARD and has spoken, IN public venues, that would NOT usually been seen but she has the authority AND knowledge of WHAT the OPERATION IS...TO BANKRUPT the DEEP STATE...AND that is what PDJT is doing. This is a 3-PRONG attack on the Deep State. 1) The MONEY...having the Vatican give us OUR GOLD BACK...ALL 650 PLANE LOADS OF IT...2) Having the 2020 "monitored" and evidence gathered---BALL BUSTER WHICH means the SOS and AG of those states are in some VERY DEEP kimchi...3) Having ENOUGH Americans wake the HELL up as too what is going on in front of their eyes since Obama rescinded the Executive Order on Propaganda Transmission to the American populace.
Having the US media ignore her is ACTUALLY a good thing because she goes on public channels that ordinary people may not visit...Once the populace "hears" ABOUT her...that will change...it takes time to bring the populace up to notch but PDJT has faith in her and the mission assigned to her is his choice...
Why do you think that?
That was not the claim, it was 650 plane loads.
What executive order?
It wasn't an EO. He signed it into law. H.R. 4310, Jan 2, 2013
"said it allowed the material produced by the State Department and the Pentagon to strike the ban that had been in place on domestic dissemination of propaganda. In layman’s terms the news media/government can broadcast propaganda to the American people as they please."
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/the-controversy-surrounding-bill-hr-4310-does-it-give-the-news-media-freedom-to-disseminate-propaganda-to-the-american-people/
So that means it was passed by Congress before he signed it. And this is the big military authorization bill that always passes Congress.
OK, your links says it's about the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012.
I remember this now. It's pretty much had no affect on American's life since it was passed.
This doesn't really affect the "news media." This has nothing to do with the Pentagon. The law explicity prevents that
It's not about regular news media. It only applies to media produced by the BBG, which I just learned is now called The U.S. Agency for Global Media. This are the folks who produce Radio Free Europe and other stuff for outside the US.
This law lets people REQUEST shows/articles they produce. Previously you couldn't even FOIA this.
This material was already available on the web. Here's the Radio Free Europe Website's top story today. It's stuff very few Americans actually see this stuff.
https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-turkey-lavrov-fidan-ukraine-grain-deal/32573102.html
The law also explicitly prohibits "influencing" inside the US.
I think one of the reasons they created this law was the BBG was one of the few places Somalis could get accurate news about Somalia. But the Somali immigrants in the US could not access that info.
I remember a lot of controversy over this, but I don't think it's affect folks realy since thn.
As someone who was not pay attention to all this back in 2012/2013, my own knowledge is somewhat limited.
I do believe the State Department holds great sway on what the news media reports. (Look at the recent Tucker clip saying the media disnt report Obama as gay, just to keep their access, as an example) I do not, for one second believe, no funds have been spent to influence the American public
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4083426-state-department-cancels-facebook-meetings-after-court-order-report/
I also look to Q post #4008 and the "U.S. Government Counterinsurgency Guide" which lists propaganda as
"a key element of persuasion and is used at the local, national and often international levels to influence perceptions of potential supporters, opinion leaders, and opponents in the favor of the insurgents; promoting the insurgent cause and diminishing the government’s resolve"
Can't believe they wouldn't turn this on the America. The media lies everyday and has only gotten worse the past decade
I wouldn't use Tucker as an example and if we did that has nothing to do with State Department at all.
This just means the State Department was going to continue it's normal work funding it's normal meedia sites through the U.S. Agency for Global Media. USAGM's mission
https://www.usagm.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/USAGM-FY2022-PAR.pdf
Unless you're getting your news from those sites there's nothing that affects you. People saw the world propaganda and got all bent out of shape.
The Facebook thing has nothing whatsoever to with the USAGM.
13848 is not an Obama executive order and the OP was wrong it was not an executive order. It was a law passed by Congress revising an older law.
13848 is Foreign Election Interference one.
Oh, I thought Trump was mentioned as the EO author.
No President writes Executive Orders. They sign them so they can executed, but staff lawyers write these things. Sometimes they write an executive order because Congress passed a law they had to follow.
The famous executive order about human rights and corrupt actors that Trump signed in 2017 is because of 2016 law.
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm0243
650 million is not very much money. It's a little over half a billion. Chump change in the world of national economics. I do not think that this number is correct at all.
650 plane loads of gold.
Point 2 above 💯.
I've only noticed that her hands shake in interviews. I think it is very nervous business that she is undertaking. She seems very sweet.
I think this part
answers this part
Here's my question why should we have heard about her before?
She seems to live in Britain and have been active in politics there.
I confess to being jaded. Way too many people have come and gone who portrayed themselves as having inside knowledge. So, I can hope she is a messenger sent to signal we are in the end game, but I’ll only be comfortable with that when this is over, when the future proves the past.
I remember a few years ago some body saying a way to check for fake news is does it get you excited? Fudging the facts or outright lying to either get you riled up or tell you exactly what you want to hear is a way to go viral and get clicks or clout.
So the second way is if this isn't from a solid source, is anyone else reporting this? (Still could be fake because they could all be relying on the same original source.)
Halper-Hayes... any relation to Stefan Halper, the fat deepstate professor dude (American but based in UK, I think) paid by Obama's Pentagon, who helped to entrap George Papadopoulos in the London cigar bar?
She's UK based so it's intriguing. .....
looking....
She is not his wife and is too young to be his daughter.
I think she might have been born in the UK according to one site, he would have been in the US at the time. So probably not is my guess.
And old Georgie was running his mouth before he ever met Stefan Halper.
She sounds like she reading a checklist of items from a discussion on this board...suspicious, but then again, Trump did the Truth post about her. I sure hope she's the real deal!
GEOTUS: “I know nothing about that [QAnon]”
Q: POST 4881
“There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3”
There is NO QAnon for Trump to “know about”. Plausible Deniability
This👆.
Corsi and his bullshit. To even think out of the blue they asked Trump in like 2015 is ridiculous. He was twttin' comms back in 2008 about this shit. This whole thing has been a plan for at least 25 years.
You are correct. JFK Jr. was his Best Friend.
I personally HATE the idea of him becoming third in line and impeaching Biden and Harris. That looks like a dictator move. Prove the damn election was stolen and punish those that stole it so it NEVER happens again. Doing it the way she is saying would only embolden the left. We want justice. We want it proven they are all liars and thieves. We want them ALL exposed so anyone within a mile of center left will never have anything to do with Democrats and the media again.
I can not stress how much I hate the idea of him getting in the way she said.
"Disinformation is necessary."
-- Q
Yeah, the idea of making him "Speaker of the House" so he can be 2nd in line for the presidency is as dippy as they come IMHO. He doesn't want to be 2nd or 1st in line waiting for the presidency; he's the president.
I like the idea of being straightforward, not doing what would only be perceived as a bizarre stunt by a guy who can't get elected, to go around the normal processes of govt—a dic(tator) move.
Will not happen.
She DID say "I'm not saying that this is Trump's plan at all."
💯% u/TheTroof
Yes.
Grade A-1 Hopium.
It's tough to keep waiting, but there are certainly many connections that the military and Trump are running something to expose the deep state. Perhaps Trumps first presidency was setting the stage and was too soon to take them down? Perhaps we needed to really expose Biden and the corrupt deep state behind him by giving Biden the win? There are a lot of variables and what ifs. I do enjoy these kinds of posts because it does detail that there is a chance the good people are trying to do something. Time will tell, but good golly it will be something else if these people do finally get arrested. It's been 8-9 years since Trump came down the elevator. Hard to believe it's been that long already. It's gonna be a tough year leading up to the election so just try to not get burnt out with everything coming...
That is very likely the case.
Just think about how far we have come since Trump showed up.
In my own circles, I was the ONLY one saying in 2015/2016 that corruption was the #1 problem that needed to be solved, and everything else (tax policy, border policy, etc.) meant nothing if the corruption was not dealt with.
Even I did not realize just how deep it went.
But nobody else I knew could even understand what I was saying.
Fast forward to now:
Maybe people don't quite have a handle on what exactly to think, but they now KNOW that something is wrong. That was not the case in 2015/2016.
If Trump went after Hillary, they would have had to deal with corrupt judges, corrupt prosecutors who would throw the case in her favor, corrupt Congress who might have removed him from office, corrupt adminstration cabinet who might have removed him from office, corrupt media who would have spun it all and the public who was still duped by the media.
The psychology of the people has changed dramatically from then to now. A lot of people here have a hard time seeing it because we have been awake a long time, and it feels like it is just dragging out and will never really get resolved.
But you do have to set the stage before the show can begin.
What seems to be interesting is that Obama never left and is running a shadow presidency with Joe as the face of it.
Trump never left either, and is running a shadow presidency with Joe as the face of it.
No wonder Joe is shot, he's taking orders and being controlled by two divergent entities. The reason he is always back home or on vacation is probably to minimize how much white hats can use him for their purposes. The blackhats shove him in his home and tell him to just shut up.
Patriots are in control.
October Delta
u/#q4
Normie Proof...Awesome Compilation!
The speaker thing has come and gone and does a disservice to the video as a whole
As does not reducing not the music to hear the voices clearly.
Wireless Monitoring Device, WMD, Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Coincidence?
THEY GOT TheGoods!
I want to see Jan on the War Room next. I bet Bannon knows her.
I have a hard time buying into the idea that Biden is not the real Biden.
Watching this video and I am seriously reconsidering that. (time stamp 13:30)
The forehead, ears and eye color arent even right
Body doubles are a fact for all presidents. The question is who does the double serve?
I got everything I need for the storm. Ready for service Mr. President.
I kinda feel like she has just been redpilled, and is awake. And is now speaking everything she has heard. Some may be true, some not, some in question. But she’s going all in on Anon style info. That’s always a bit dangerous when your being served the whole plate and then start to talk about it. You may get a lot wrong. Or in a wrong order.
Or she knows exactly what’s she saying and like omgwtfbbq!