what I find most interesting with these various mentions by Scalise, Dr Jan Halper-hayes, etc, is that the corporate media seems to be afraid to mention these topics which only lends it that much more credibility.
instead of the MSM interviewing Scalise or running a hit piece on Scalise claiming he's obviously losing his mental acumen, they ignore it and refuse to touch it. 🤔
This is kinda in a similar vein as Melanias tweet about being excited to witness President Trump signing the Declaration of Independence a couple years ago.
BTW I havent really delved into the recent conversation about this new Declaration but I know Melanias tweet was just before the 4th of July. Was that the 4th in 2020 when he was at Mt. Rushmore? Cuz that really brings on some of that freedom wood.
It is looking like the cabal must stop an election by any means necessary because if we get there they lose. Their fraudulent ground game wont be enough to overcome the real votes with space force or whoever stopping the digital fraud as they did in 2016. This is cornered rat time. Theyve tried to stop it and they cant. Nothing they used before works any longer. Even most of the normies can see through the lies even if they dont understand what is really happening. Catastrophic events is their last recourse whether they be real or manufactured. I do expect some sort of kinetic battle in the US at some point. They are out of time and being sucked into the quicksand.
Observe the expression on the face of the woman to the left of screen at the "45th Speaker of the House" statement. Looks like "Holy shit, he said it, woohoo"
Okay... so either they are trolling the fk out of us, or we are on to the new--- Republic. I'm afraid to give my anecdotal evidence because if I do then it might out the op. In fact, just saying that, might do as well. If this continues for another month 'or so', I might think about sharing my anecdotal evidence, not sooner.
Okay... so either they are trolling the fk out of us, or we are on to the new--- Republic. I'm afraid to give my anecdotal evidence because if I do then it might out the op. In fact, just saying that, might do as well. If this continues for another month 'or so', I might think about sharing my anecdotal evidence, not sooner.
FFS just give the data or don't. We're all sick to death of this "I've got info I might share later" crap. Nothing personal but come on.
Don't know what you mean by 'out', but there is no 'out' if (the collective us) keeps funding [them]. That is a fact. So if you believe that the defunct corp exists, why feed said monster? This all ends when we decide it does, not sooner. Our choice, but, with ramifications.
It's a cost benefit analysis - they expend resources to collect where it's most highly profitable. Not sure where the threshold is. You may be under their radar and not worth the hassle. So it's not good advice for some people. Like a cop would rather fine an upstanding citizen who pays the ticket vs fine and jail the vagrant who is more headache and costs money. Many good households would be made examples in this scenario.
Edit: people have been avoiding taxes successfully since long before the MAGA movement so in my mind it's not an indicator.
Right, not being an ass, but pragmatist. It is a choice, for many, an uncomfortable one. Most here hope that this will all end soon. I'm saying it wont 'end' until "we" say it ends; and it will when "we the people" make up our collective minds. Power in numbers... (Divided we are weak, together we are strong). Also, I'm priority one on said radar for the last 20 years and it seems to be not working the same as before. All I said is that I'm not giving more anecdotal detail to the same, YET. That appears to be the issue. So be it.
Understood and I will say this. If you're priority one, and have resources to contest this in court, then you wouldnt be priority one in a cost benefit analysis. You'd be a headache in proving the unconstitutionality of the IRS, unless there were a political benefit to taking you on. People have beat the gov't on this before. So they'd really start going after the sole proprietorships and 1-2 member corps whose principals make +/- $500k/yr.
Thanks, fren. Getting harder each day to keep on keeping on. I really just can't put into words how devastated I feel after being a hard working honest person for my entire life just to have it all pulled out from under me.
Don't give up! We're closer than any of us think to the end of this shit show. It will all be worth the sacrifice we've all put in over the years. Keep moving forward and remember, God always wins and when he wins we win.
Re-watching the whole 3-minute speech there are other contextual clues in the speech as well. "People will come to live not just him but what he represents..."
If you only increment the number when a new person is elected to SOTH, Mike Johnson is the 56th unique person to hold the office.
Take a look through wikipedia's list of speakers and you will see what I mean. The same men hold the office and alternate in and out multiple times. Every time this happens, the SOTH number incriments by one on this list. But if you click on their names you will see the other counting system that only increments when a new individual takes the office. By that counting system, Mike Johnson is exactly number 56. You can even see that listed on his official wikipedia page.
So the 56 number from that press release is nothing unusual. However the 45 number that Scalise used remains entirely interdasting.
Actually, after looking at this little more closely. There have only been 56 speakers. Many people have been speakers multiple times but there's only been 56 total, but none of this answer is why he was introduced as 45 because he should be 56.
Bingo. That's as far as I have gotten with unraveling this mystery as well.
By the official record the 45th SOTH was John W. McCormack who served in the position from 1962 to 1971. This means the dates don't line up as nicely with the US becoming a corporation as we had previously thought.
But it might lineup with the first bankruptcy. Which I think did happen in 71 or the early 70s? So I wonder if that could have something to do with it.
I'll have to dig to see when the first bankruptcy actually happened. Cause there's been 3.
If you dig up anything interesting regarding that please let me know! That is an interesting thread I will pull on as well and I will post any findings in this thread.
From everything I see Michael C. Kerr was Speaker during the 44th Congress, but only the 28th Speaker.
The actual 44th speaker was John McCormack.
This only makes the whole slip up more confusing.
Correct that Kerr was the 25th SOTH and it was PRESIDING over the 44th Congress. Same page shows Johnson as our 56th SOTH over the 118th Congress. I think Scalise's slip still stands, and is likely intentional based on the reaction of the people behind him, including Mike, but you are correct.
The US was incorporated on Feb 21, 1871. That means if the corporation is dissolved then he would be the 42nd speaker after James G Blaine. This post makes no sense based on this info.
That being said, I have no other explanation for what he said lol
Maybe part of this is we need to believe and operate according to the true narrative. Speak as if its so, practice as if it's so, refuse the old paradigm and let those who can't shift wither off the vine. If reality is our perception, well we now have a perception to believe that worth it. We should act free, amd not let them say or practice otherwise. Not from d.c.,not from our statehouse or county chambers. Everyone changes or goes away to quiet obscurity.
what I find most interesting with these various mentions by Scalise, Dr Jan Halper-hayes, etc, is that the corporate media seems to be afraid to mention these topics which only lends it that much more credibility.
instead of the MSM interviewing Scalise or running a hit piece on Scalise claiming he's obviously losing his mental acumen, they ignore it and refuse to touch it. 🤔
u/#q1770
its the corporation of america founded, read a tweet about it yesterday
https://imgur.com/a/IafOrSZ#4dB0D1U
This is kinda in a similar vein as Melanias tweet about being excited to witness President Trump signing the Declaration of Independence a couple years ago.
BTW I havent really delved into the recent conversation about this new Declaration but I know Melanias tweet was just before the 4th of July. Was that the 4th in 2020 when he was at Mt. Rushmore? Cuz that really brings on some of that freedom wood.
Ya. Weird. Lots of speculation about dissolved corporation and the last speaker being the 44th before we were hijacked. No way that was a mistake.
"less than five months" - Trump
All I know is that the 2024 election is a year from now and alot of shit has to and will happen before then. Exciting times for sure.
All I know is I love your username and avatar. And I agree, lots shall be happening. Buckle up.
u/#Honkler
The way things are going now, I dont think there will be another election.
It is looking like the cabal must stop an election by any means necessary because if we get there they lose. Their fraudulent ground game wont be enough to overcome the real votes with space force or whoever stopping the digital fraud as they did in 2016. This is cornered rat time. Theyve tried to stop it and they cant. Nothing they used before works any longer. Even most of the normies can see through the lies even if they dont understand what is really happening. Catastrophic events is their last recourse whether they be real or manufactured. I do expect some sort of kinetic battle in the US at some point. They are out of time and being sucked into the quicksand.
1876 was 44th speaker, 1877 corp of america founded.
was posted here yesterday i believe
https://imgur.com/a/IafOrSZ#4dB0D1U
He should be 55
McCarthy was 55. Johnson would be the the 56th
Sauce (thanks to u/Mr_A for the link).
can i comment here?
its because in 1877 the Corporation of America was founded.
https://imgur.com/a/IafOrSZ#4dB0D1U
Observe the expression on the face of the woman to the left of screen at the "45th Speaker of the House" statement. Looks like "Holy shit, he said it, woohoo"
Okay... so either they are trolling the fk out of us, or we are on to the new--- Republic. I'm afraid to give my anecdotal evidence because if I do then it might out the op. In fact, just saying that, might do as well. If this continues for another month 'or so', I might think about sharing my anecdotal evidence, not sooner.
FFS just give the data or don't. We're all sick to death of this "I've got info I might share later" crap. Nothing personal but come on.
When I say this all ends when we all decide to stop funding our own destruction... I mean it... Bet you all are still funding the monster, right?
So you quit filing and paying income and property tax? And that would somehow out OP?
Don't know what you mean by 'out', but there is no 'out' if (the collective us) keeps funding [them]. That is a fact. So if you believe that the defunct corp exists, why feed said monster? This all ends when we decide it does, not sooner. Our choice, but, with ramifications.
It's a cost benefit analysis - they expend resources to collect where it's most highly profitable. Not sure where the threshold is. You may be under their radar and not worth the hassle. So it's not good advice for some people. Like a cop would rather fine an upstanding citizen who pays the ticket vs fine and jail the vagrant who is more headache and costs money. Many good households would be made examples in this scenario.
Edit: people have been avoiding taxes successfully since long before the MAGA movement so in my mind it's not an indicator.
Right, not being an ass, but pragmatist. It is a choice, for many, an uncomfortable one. Most here hope that this will all end soon. I'm saying it wont 'end' until "we" say it ends; and it will when "we the people" make up our collective minds. Power in numbers... (Divided we are weak, together we are strong). Also, I'm priority one on said radar for the last 20 years and it seems to be not working the same as before. All I said is that I'm not giving more anecdotal detail to the same, YET. That appears to be the issue. So be it.
Understood and I will say this. If you're priority one, and have resources to contest this in court, then you wouldnt be priority one in a cost benefit analysis. You'd be a headache in proving the unconstitutionality of the IRS, unless there were a political benefit to taking you on. People have beat the gov't on this before. So they'd really start going after the sole proprietorships and 1-2 member corps whose principals make +/- $500k/yr.
When I say if username applies, then just come out with the stuff already or STFU, nothing personal, I mean it.
Tell us what you know now or shut the fuck up
Okay "Sally" lol
Username does absofuckinglutely not check out
Spill it or togtfo
Can’t wait. I did see another anon mention the fact that we are already in the new Republic. I believed it then and now.
Why not sooner?
If the media thought that, they would lose their shit.
He very clearly said the 45th speaker of the house.
Go to the 2:50 mark.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VYoswL3SPA
He's called "45"
But I've never heard him called "45th"
I suspect he meant that, without exactly saying it.
Sorta goes with Flynn's comment. "What's a Speaker?" It's where the audio comes out, but not where it originates.
The USA corporation was bankrupted by Trump in 2019.
I was bankrupted by Biden in 2022.
You, and millions more. We'll get through this.
Thanks, fren. Getting harder each day to keep on keeping on. I really just can't put into words how devastated I feel after being a hard working honest person for my entire life just to have it all pulled out from under me.
Don't give up! We're closer than any of us think to the end of this shit show. It will all be worth the sacrifice we've all put in over the years. Keep moving forward and remember, God always wins and when he wins we win.
Praying.
You can't bankrupt the corrupt system that just keeps printing money
When you smash their printer and take away the paper.
I heard about this theory, but didn't realise Scalise introduced him as 45th Speaker. Anyone has a link to the clip? Sounds notable.
Roughly 2:55 minute mark. https://youtu.be/4VYoswL3SPA
Re-watching the whole 3-minute speech there are other contextual clues in the speech as well. "People will come to live not just him but what he represents..."
Thanks fren.
"It is the honor of a lifetime to have been elected the 56th Speaker of the House.“
https://mikejohnson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1348
If you only increment the number when a new person is elected to SOTH, Mike Johnson is the 56th unique person to hold the office.
Take a look through wikipedia's list of speakers and you will see what I mean. The same men hold the office and alternate in and out multiple times. Every time this happens, the SOTH number incriments by one on this list. But if you click on their names you will see the other counting system that only increments when a new individual takes the office. By that counting system, Mike Johnson is exactly number 56. You can even see that listed on his official wikipedia page.
So the 56 number from that press release is nothing unusual. However the 45 number that Scalise used remains entirely interdasting.
Yes I concur...very interdasting.
56th?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_speakers_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives
David B Henderson 1899 - 1903.
David B Henderson was the Speaker for the 56th Congress, not the 56th Speaker.
Actually, after looking at this little more closely. There have only been 56 speakers. Many people have been speakers multiple times but there's only been 56 total, but none of this answer is why he was introduced as 45 because he should be 56.
Bingo. That's as far as I have gotten with unraveling this mystery as well.
By the official record the 45th SOTH was John W. McCormack who served in the position from 1962 to 1971. This means the dates don't line up as nicely with the US becoming a corporation as we had previously thought.
But it might lineup with the first bankruptcy. Which I think did happen in 71 or the early 70s? So I wonder if that could have something to do with it.
I'll have to dig to see when the first bankruptcy actually happened. Cause there's been 3.
If you dig up anything interesting regarding that please let me know! That is an interesting thread I will pull on as well and I will post any findings in this thread.
1933 was the 1st bankruptcy, not the 70's. 71 was when we left the gold standard so I doubt that is related.
If I find anything I will post it.
From everything I see Michael C. Kerr was Speaker during the 44th Congress, but only the 28th Speaker. The actual 44th speaker was John McCormack.
This only makes the whole slip up more confusing.
Looks like someone did their Politics for Marines MCI 😬
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5090807/user-clip-speaker-mike-johnson
Fyi, Kerr was not 44th SOTH, it was the 44th Congress, per Congress's own website. https://history.house.gov/People/Office/Speakers_Numerical_Order/
Correct that Kerr was the 25th SOTH and it was PRESIDING over the 44th Congress. Same page shows Johnson as our 56th SOTH over the 118th Congress. I think Scalise's slip still stands, and is likely intentional based on the reaction of the people behind him, including Mike, but you are correct.
The US was incorporated on Feb 21, 1871. That means if the corporation is dissolved then he would be the 42nd speaker after James G Blaine. This post makes no sense based on this info.
That being said, I have no other explanation for what he said lol
Congratulations! And it is a good catch and question!🎉🎉
So Trump will be the 19 president of the Republic
Yep and very interesting
Well, some kind of comms, we know that. I guess we can watch for any news on Thursday, Nov 2 since Q post #45 is a 6-year delta.
No, we don't know that. People can, do, and consistently fuck up.
Maybe part of this is we need to believe and operate according to the true narrative. Speak as if its so, practice as if it's so, refuse the old paradigm and let those who can't shift wither off the vine. If reality is our perception, well we now have a perception to believe that worth it. We should act free, amd not let them say or practice otherwise. Not from d.c.,not from our statehouse or county chambers. Everyone changes or goes away to quiet obscurity.
What was the reaction of those that attended?
Why do people keep saying Kerr was the 44th? He was the 26th or 23rd can't remember, the 44th was in the 1960s. Where's your sauce ?