Why is it that the countries that have been involved in direct conflict over these past few years, just happen to coincide with the countries that are tied to the fall of the Khazarian Empire?
(Ukraine) - The Khazarian Empire encompassed what is now Ukraine and parts of Eastern Europe.
Khazarians at the time were known by those living in bordering countries to generally be liars, deceivers,cons, robbers, road warriors, murderers, identity thieves and social parasites of the worst variety. And to make matters worse, their ruler did nothing to reverse this because he too was like them. They repeatedly preyed on travelers at their borders or anyone who tried to travel through Khazaria, usually a fatal mistake.
(Russia and Iran) -
Russia and Persia (Present day Iran) had repeatedly instructed Khazarian leadership that Khazaria as a nation and people had to change from its evil, inhuman ways and stop parasitizing its neighbors, or suffer complete destruction.
This ultimatum was that Khazaria as a nation had to immediately change its ways, and to do this, King Bulan must select one of the three Abrahamic religions and institute it as the official required Khazarian state religion. King Bulan was told in no uncertain terms that the religion chosen must be indoctrinated in all Khazarians to serve as rules of conduct and as a basis for integrity and ethics that were previously completely absent.
King Bulan agreed and selected Torah Judaism as Khazaria’s official religion. This worked somewhat for a while, but soon Khazarians were drifting back to their old ways of national banditry, murder and gross parasitism of others from surrounding nations.
Instead of working to establish morals and ethics in his nation by making a serious attempt to practice Torah Judaism, King Bulan and his top staff actually were inducted into the Black Arts and Black Magic of Babylonian Talmudism, better known as Baal worship or Satanism. Externally this looks a lot like Torah Judaism and can be used as false cover, which it was.
Khazaria was finally destroyed in about 1250 AD by Russia and Persia(Current day Iran) as it had been literally terrorizing, robbing, murdering and parasitizing neighbors and travelers for over 500 years.
(Israel) - 80% of Israel is owned by the Rothchilds. In fact it was Lionel Walter Rothschild who had the British Support in 1917 by decree of the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration (“Baflours promise” in Arabic) declared by Britain in 1917 statement of British support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.
The Rothchild's ancestry goes back to the Khazarian Empire.
The Khazar empire had a small but powerful group of Jewish bankers in Kiev as early as the 10th century.” – The Regime: Usury, Khazaria and the American Mass, Matthew Johnson. The Rothschilds were Ashkenazi Jews, Khazarians, “they’re arguably the most influential Nephilim Hosts of the Common Era,” Sangar said, “the Rothschild family and their Khazarian mafia have gained a foothold in almost every country since the mid-1700s.”
A Nephilim host such as the Rothchilds - “Nephilim Hosts are individuals who have partnered with the spiritual forces of darkness to carry out the Nephilim agenda.” An agenda to defile the human genome through the propagation of a hybrid race, the purpose of which is to overthrow God’s Kingdom.
(Palestine) - Having secured the support of the British government for the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine, on May 14, 1948, as soon as the British Mandate expired, Zionist forces declared the establishment of the State of Israel, triggering the first Arab-Israeli war. (known as the Nakba) The Zionist military forces expelled at least 750,000 Palestinians from their homes and lands and captured 78 percent of historic Palestine, with the remaining 22 percent was divided into what are now the occupied West Bank and the besieged Gaza Strip.
Some other interesting details that might explain the desired ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948, ties back to the Khazarians again.
Khazarians’ origin is believed to have been a hybridization between Turks and Mongols, with absolutely no genetic ties to the ancient Hebrews. It is truly interesting that these Khazarians have absolutely no ancient Hebrew Blood at all, none, although their leaders usually claim to carry ancient Hebrew Blood and to be Semites, when they are not Semites at all, and have absolutely no ancestral rights to any land in the Mideast.
About 80% of the Palestinians carry ancient Hebrew Blood and thus are true Semites, and hold an un-abandoned, absolute ancestral right to all of Palestine, despite any Khazarian claims, which are all based on lies and political intrigue.
Feel free to comment on what i shared here today. My thoughts are that the Khazarians have had a long time hate for both Russia and Persia (Present day Iran.) They still have a score to settle with the both of them. They have used the West to help finance their retaliation war against Russia, and are now pushing the notion that it is Iran, who is responsible for the recent attacks made by Hamas. This is obviously setting the stage up for the Khazarians retaliation war against Iran.
This doesnt surprise me though. When you look at Biden's executive branch, it is full of Askenazi/Khazarian Jews. (Blinken, Yellen, Garland, Nuland) These individuals have bent over backwards to ensure that Ukraine was supported against Russia, and now that Israel will be supported against Iran.
The Palestinians on the other hand must be eliminated as they hold Hebrew blood and are the true Semites. This makes them a threat to the Khazarian wanna be Jews.
https://geopolitics.co/2017/09/08/khazarians-then-khazarians-now/
This is about Greater Israel. A nation that they want to encompass the entire Mideast and Eastern Europe. They want to rule over a worldwide brown skin race of slaves. One thing stands in the way. The White race. Does all the anti-White hate make sense now?
This is about Greater Israel. A nation that they want to encompass the entire Mideast and Eastern Europe. They want to rule over a worldwide brown skin race of slaves. One thing stands in the way. The White race. Does all the White hate make sense now?
How do you explain why some people say they are Jewish and not White, even though they appear to be White?
(If the Arizona Republic paper can capitalize black, I can capitalize White!)
Jews are mixed, and therefore, not White.
What percentage of "white people" do you have to be to actually qualify as "white people"?
Just curious if I pass the bar or not...
If I gave you a number, would you be able to prove it, one way or the other?
Just use the simple math equation: "How much shit can you steal divided by how many crackers can you get with the knock out game" and what ever that equals is your percentage of honkyness...
LOL.
I especially like the "cracker" insult.
They seem to be too stupid to realize that the Cracker was the White man who cracked the whip when the cotton production was going too slow.
Got a shower thought after this : What If the Holocaust was an Op by the KM to ensure every last remnant of the Hebrew blood in Europe was wiped out, and then use it to cover up all major fuckery they were doing until the. 1920-30's that pissed off europeans so bad they allowed fascism to rise, in a Hegelian dialetic move ?
This isn't entirely about the Israelites. It's about the Adamic race. They are the true target. As in the days of Noah, so it shall be during Christ's return. What race was around during the days of Noah? What race did the fallen angels try to pervert with race-mixing? Why the warning about mixing with the Beasts of the Field?
^ BINGO.
Why were the only death camps that were found and “verified” were only discovered by the Soviet Union? The US and UK never found any, and the USSR wouldn’t let anyone else inspect their claims for years until after the war.
Why do we take the Communists at their word for anything?
Why did those death camps have maternity wards, swimming pools, sports teams, theaters? A lot of amenities for guests in a death camp. And how does one survive multiple death camps?
Why were 3,000 babies born in these camps?
Soccer balls and lampshades. /s
Pregnant mothers were taken as prisoners during the collection phase of the program. No merit ticket to be passed over for pregnancy.
Do you understand that the Khazarians made up 17/22 seats in the first soviet government?
If we win the revolution, we shall establish the power of Zionism upon the wreckage of the revolution's funeral and we shall become a power before which the whole world will sink to its knees. We shall show what real power is. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence.
Leon Trotsky
On March 27, 1917 Davidovich Bronstein (Khazarian Jew), better known as "Trotsky" and his group of Jewish communists set off to Russia, to lead a revolution with no less than 20 million dollars in gold. Today, it would be worth billions! Some 90,000 exiles, mostly Jews & Freemasons, returned from all over the world to infiltrate Russia. Most of them changed their Jewish names to blend into European society better. With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), who was a quarter Jew on his mother's father's side, most of the leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-1920 were Jews. Leon Trotsky (Bronstein) headed the Red Army and was chief of Soviet foreign affairs.
"The Bolsheviks revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world." The American Hebrew, 1920
Alexander Solzhenitsyn was a Nobel prize-winning novelist, historian, and victim of Jewish Bolshevism spending 8 long years in the Soviet Gulags. He pleaded... "You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians! They hated Christians! Driven by ethnic hatred, they tortured & slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse."
The October Revolution was not what you call in America the 'Russian Revolution'. It was an invasion & conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at the blood-stained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It can not be understated! Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is Ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators. We can not state that all Jews are Bolsheviks, but without Jews there would have been no Bolshevism. For a Jew, nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood-maddened Jewish terrorists murdered 66 million in Russia from 1918 to 1957.
I was answering the question of where the 3,000 babies came from. I have no idea how your reply is relevant to either the question or my answer.
Unless you can provide a birth certificate to prove the point, calling Bronstein/Trotsky a "Khazarian Jew" is only a fantasy. On a par with calling people Babylonians or Hittites.
I have been a longtime reader of Russian history, especially of Solzhenitsyn. The Bolsheviks were wolves in human form. But to call them "Jews" makes about as much sense as calling them red-headed, or left-handed. Just as it is beside the point to emphasize the Italian side of the Mafia. (If there were no Italians there would be no Mafia?)
Without human beings, there would be no sin. Are you aware of the logic of what you are saying?
You will find throughout recent history that if you see in any country the rise in communism, that is has been the Askenazi/Kharazian Jews who have introduced and implemented it
“The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.”
– Crypto-Jew David Rockefeller
"How Jews took over China and created Chinese Communism"
https://fitzinfo.net/2021/07/19/how-jews-took-over-china-an-created-chinese-communism/amp/
How about a nice game of Dauchau?
I mean, off the top of my head, Easy Company and the 522nd liberated camps.
I know I'll get down voted for going against tm"the great Jewish conspiracy" that pervades this board, but as a Bible reading Christian, attacks on Jews isn't exactly a historical lie.
Before the ground troops ever moved in, the air corps were already aware of the camps. They bombed them and their supply lines because many of the camps were producing war materials. Also, the Allies had broken the German communication code and knew before D-Day about the camps. The story that Easy Company discovered anything not already known is Hollywood propaganda.
Your comment speaks truth.
Lol okay, but what camps were they, and were they actually death camps, or just labor camps?
This article goes into details of "The Hidden Jewish Hand in the Destruction of White South Africa."
https://christiansfortruth.com/the-hidden-jewish-hand-in-the-destruction-of-white-south-africa/
What I’ve been thinking lately is did the cabal have FDR set up the Japanese internment camps so they could do a genocide narrative against whichever side lost? If the Axis had reached and then conquered America, surely history would have rewritten those camps as genocide factories.
USA had internment camps for Japanese because Japan declared war on USA, and maybe the Japanese living within USA would have tried to help Japan by sabotaging Americans from within.
Likewise, the jews had declared war on Germany, so the jews living within Germany were suspected of (and many actually did) try to sabotage from within.
This is why Otto Frank was arrested. Not because he was a jew, but because he was a jew who was actively trying to secretly harm the Germans from within the Netherlands when it was occupied by Germany.
So, when are they going to set up internment camps for all the pro Palestine people that attacked the White House the other night? 🤣😂
They already have an internment camp ... in Gaza.
They should be charging the White House peeps with insurraction, though.
J6, and all ...
I thought we were discussing America
Sure, I know the official reason for the internment camps. But if the Axis had won, would that have been how they were reported? Simply as a way to separate potential saboteurs? Or would they have turned into America’s systematic genocide of Asians, with 6 million innocent Japanese burned in ovens, turned into lampshades, or boiled into soap, and anyone who questions otherwise is a bigoted anti-Nazi capitalist pig?
Those are my thoughts as well.
On top of this, the white people of southern Africa are descendants of several different tribes of Israel. Amazing end-time prophecies In the Bible tell us that a God-fearing remnant of Israelites will remain in southern Africa.
Hence the white genocide that has been taking place over the past decade in South Africa.
https://ensignmessage.com/articles/israelites-in-southern-africa/
I thought the white people in south africa were Dutch
This is a fantastic post it should be sticky.
People forget it’s always about bloodlines!
This whole psychological operation regarding the fight between the Jews. In the Palestinians is the stupidest thing for people to fall for.
They want us divided, and the best way to do that is to create another distraction - for us to choose sides.
The fact of the matter is that God wins!
No one can stop what is coming!
Don't gets your hopes up for a sticky. There's a lot of hard truths to reckon in this post that many will ignore and call nonsense.
Suppression. 🤪
I was gladly proven wrong.
Yay!
No longer stickied. Womp womp
128 comments though
Yes, and even though my post.is not stickied, im so pleased with the amount and level of depth of conversation that has taken place here today.
I see that 🤔
And there is a lot of nonsense that many will admire and call truth. (Interesting that the Khazarian Empire can be "destroyed"...yet right afterward there is a thriving "Khazarian Mafia." They must have risen from the dead.)
They simply moved and changed their names -- to things like Silverstein and Rothschild.
Just because Khazaria was destroyed as a nation doesn't mean it was eliminated completely. Same happened with Canaan and Babylon. The blood and spirit live on through the survivors and those who escaped.
Show me a provable Caananite or Babylonian and you might have a point. The polity, society, and culture are entirely gone. Blood is blood, notorious for bleeding. "Spirit" is entirely conjectural and immaterial.
By spirit I mean beliefs. There are many around who have their spirit. Just look at every single Masonic Lodge.
Well, I can't help this. You defend one mythological idea with another mythological idea. Nothing but anti-Semitism and anti-Mason bias.
Both group deserve to be eradicated.
Yup, just like the Knights Templar, the Top Ranked Officials stayed in France to be Slaughtered, while their Navy became the High Seas Pirates, and the FreeMasons popped up in England shortly thereafter....
Oh, wait, you probably didn't want to know that level of Deception is possible....
It seems like every comment I see from you is some pseudo-intellectual, snide, bullshit remark that isn't made with an ounce of good faith. And that is usually missing some glaring aspect of the issue entirely.
For example, this "observation" you've made isn't nearly as smart as you must think it is.
Operation Paperclip
If something like that happened back then, and they successfully destroyed any historical evidence of it, how would you ever know?
And do you really think that the fall of empires completely destroys all the people within? Or do those people begrudgingly accept the fact their great society fell and go into the shadows of what now reigns over them to either plot something else or die?
If China successfully invaded and took over America, with full control of our military, police, federal government, and state and local governments, what would you do? Lay down and proclaim Xi Jinping as your new Emperor?
Of course you wouldn't do that. And it's no different. Anyone who survives something like that, and is thus still alive under the new order, whether it's the leaders or the citizens; they will fight back in some way.
When Donald Trump won the presidency did the entire deepstate apparatus just go "oh darn! I guess he got us!" and give up? Or did they work to stop him despite what the law says?
Obviously, they didn't just give up. Do you think they would if we completely took the country over from them but failed to execute them all for treason? Maybe some are successful in fleeing to some safe haven island or other country. Surely they'll just call it a day and become good people or something, right?
And of course, any group that successfully builds an empire, even one that falls to outside forces in its time, is a group that is to be treated with the utmost respect towards their abilities. To discount them even in seeming defeat would be foolish.
Those were the days when "destroyed" had a tangible meaning. Reference the works of Kublai Khan, and Tamerlane. Also the destruction of Carthage.
If something like Operation Paperclip had happened long ago, and all the evidence had been effaced, how would you know it had happened, yourself? It is a logical conundrum to make claims about what happened, when all knowledge is obliterated. The simple answer is that the Khazars dissipated as a people and a society, and interbred with other peoples, to lose any genetic or ethnic uniqueness. Such information can always be lost. If you talk about the breedlines of dogs, for example, you always come back to the fact that thorough-going mongrelization would simply revert back to the primitive wolf.
(In any case, Operation Paperclip brought us von Braun and his team from Peenemunde, without whom we would not have had the Saturn V to take us to the Moon. It is silly to continually bring it up in tones of menace.)
Of course the Deep State is the opposing force. Why would you even ask that question?
People here are prone to instance the work of Satan as the source of the evil we face. I have no disagreement with that, but I think they don't take that claim very seriously. Satan is the Prince of Lies and his greatest power is not to induce demonic evil, but to beguile with lies and deception. The greatest lie and deception we face from our opposition is the idea that they are supremely powerful. This is carefully cultivated by them. Those who don't suspect are nevertheless enthralled by The Narrative. Those who do suspect are not enthralled by the news content or propaganda---but they are enthralled with the fear that they are nearly omnipotent, just as you have shown. I don't take it for granted that they are as powerful as they want us to think (and, make no mistake, they want us to think that). Their fear, anxiety, and panic is because they dread us discovering that deception.
as did the nazis
Here’s a great little question for everyone here to look up, what was the religion of the majority of the bolsheviks that seized power in the communist revolution in Russia? Was the formation of the Soviet Union and the untold millions upon millions of deaths of Russians civilians a revenge plot for an old grudge forgotten by most?
What was the religion of the collaborators and masterminds of the German Civil war, right after the end of WWI, that killed millions of Germans, and ultimately failed, in an attempt to establish Communism there too?
Not just their religion, but their ethnic background was jewish.
Putin himself acknowledges this when speaking to a group of jews:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3o9qwl?syndication=273844
Although it is called the "Russian Revolution," it was no revolution of Russians. It was a coup d'etat by jews.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP17DyydOIA
Wall Street banker jews funded the operation, with Lenin and Trotsky leading the way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaFklTLNy8c
Lenin and his jewish co-conspirators hated White Europeans, which is why they were so disgustingly brutal:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FcKa9IALEwBW/
The jews tried, and for a brief period did, overthrow parts of Germany, as Germany was being defeated in the final days of WW1.
Two of the leaders were executed for their attempts.
https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1918-20/
https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1921-23/
https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1924-28/
https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1929-33/
This was Hitler's primary motive to get the jews out of Germany (not to kill them all, which is a jewish lie).
Most jews themselves have never been told WHY Hitler hated jews. Here, two rabbis explain it. Notice how the jews in the audience are clueless about it, and the first rabbi himself says he never knew it until recently:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLqXs9hXsA4
Jewish = looking like jew, but not the same thing.
Jew = pejorative for opprobrious behavior.
Judeas/ Jehudim is the correct designation.
that said: indeed communism is essentially judaism. And Bavaria bore the brunt of the post war battle for commie supremacy.
A person can be "jewish" by converting to the religion of Judaism. But MOST of the people we refer to as "jew" or "jewish" are of the ethnic variety, whether religious or not so much.
The fact that it can also be used as a "pajorative for approbrious behavior," is merely due to the fact that this is how so many of them behave, and have done so for many, many centuries. Not ALL blacks are looters; but MOST looters are black. Same concept for jews and their nasty behavior through the centuries.
No. These are the Latin and Greek terms that were used during the time of Christ to describe the residents of Judea, which by that time was no longer the Kingdom of Judah, but was now the Roman province of Judea. The "jews" (not called that back then) were living in Judea and CLAIMING to be genetic decendents of Jacob/Israel (i.e. Israelites, of the covenant), but LIED ABOUT IT because THEY WERE NOT the Israelites.
Jesus confronted these people many times, and called them out:
Not exactly. Communism was created by jews, as the antithesis to the jewish Illuminati, so they could do the old "Problem > Reaction > Solution." Also known as "Order out of Chaos," which is EXACTLY what we are witnessing today in the 21st Century.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twEWYTvX3lQ
True. Germany was next on the jewish checklist, after the overthrow of Russia.
The jewish plan was to take over all of Europe, and then the world. Hitler stopped Stalin from a full-on European invasion:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/OM1UlLkQQfZv/
And that would have been extremely brutal for all of Europe:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vi3dyEySSt6t/
https://archive.org/details/ImpartialTruth
Are you carefully listening to what these people say themselves?
Of course, you can continue to belief, whatever you want. And you can continue to try to convince everyone of your point of view. Listen to what THEY say.
And you will find, you are wrong. You need to let go, and listen carefully.
Don't be vague.
Spell it out.
What did that rabbi say as a name for what you call Jews ..... He uses 3 terms. All with different meaning. Listen very carefully. He uses the term: Yehudim.
This is also the term used in Arabic.
Then, please, read my post here: https://archive.searchvoat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3465100
Still not clear.
What I will say is this:
When we are talking about language, and especially many languages, it gets tricky.
The original books of the Old Testament were written in Hebrew. The New Testament in Greek.
None of it was written in English, which did not exist.
There is no "j" in Hebrew or Greek. When Wycliff did the first translation into English, in the year 1345, the world "jew" did not exist.
Originally, he wrote "gyu," and this evolved over many translations into "jew" (same pronunciation as gyu). He had to make it up because it was the first syllable of the sound of the Hebrew and Greek words used for the residents of Judea.
By the time of Christ, there was no more Kingdom of Israel or Kingdom of Judah. It was the Roman Empire province of Judea. The people living there were of several different ethnicities. It was a "diverse" culture. It was no longer only the Israelites.
The word "jew" was used in the English versions of the Bible to describe SOME of these people living in Judea.
They were the people who were NOT of Israelite blood, but who were claiming to be. Jesus knew who was who, and who was a fake. He called them out for their lies ("hypocrisy").
Beyond that, I don't care what this rabbi does or does not have to say about it.
Where does the Bible espouse communism - or did it come from the Talmud?
I really hope you know HOW to read for Context and Understanding....
https://archive.org/details/fulltheprotocolsofthelearnedeldersofzion/mode/2up
They Do NOT study the TORAH for Religious Purposes, they DO Study the TALMUD for Religious Purposes....
https://archive.org/details/FullTalmud/page/n1/mode/2up
I understand that jews use the word "Torah" to mean different things.
Sometimes, "Torah" means only the first 5 books of the Bible.
Other times, "Torah" means ALL of judaism, which includes the Talmud.
In this way, they can both lie and tell the truth at the same time.
Is that in Reform Judaism?
The Torah should only be Genesis to Deuteronomy.
The Talmud also teaches jews to lie to non-jews, especially about their religion.
So, does it really matter?
Communism was created by jews in 1829 (Marx was merely the jew who was tasked with writing a book in 1849 to make it easier to promote).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twEWYTvX3lQ
It's not my saying. Rabbi's are saying it.
To be fair: the book of Acts of the Apostles has a verse where it indicates some form of communism, if one were to be inclined to regard it as such. What, however is absent is the central planning and state ownership of all production capacity ( this includes people).
the second part of your question is the answer.
Always the Babylonian book…
Also Sabbatai Zevi. His belief in redemption through sin is a giant WTF.
Yup!
Askenazi's/Khazarians made up 17/22 seats in the first soviet government?
If we win the revolution, we shall establish the power of Zionism upon the wreckage of the revolution's funeral and we shall become a power before which the whole world will sink to its knees. We shall show what real power is. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence.
Leon Trotsky
On March 27, 1917 Davidovich Bronstein (Khazarian Jew), better known as "Trotsky" and his group of Jewish communists set off to Russia, to lead a revolution with no less than 20 million dollars in gold. Today, it would be worth billions! Some 90,000 exiles, mostly Jews & Freemasons, returned from all over the world to infiltrate Russia. Most of them changed their Jewish names to blend into European society better. With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), who was a quarter Jew on his mother's father's side, most of the leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-1920 were Jews. Leon Trotsky (Bronstein) headed the Red Army and was chief of Soviet foreign affairs.
"The Bolsheviks revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world." The American Hebrew, 1920
Alexander Solzhenitsyn was a Nobel prize-winning novelist, historian, and victim of Jewish Bolshevism spending 8 long years in the Soviet Gulags. He pleaded... "You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians! They hated Christians! Driven by ethnic hatred, they tortured & slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse."
The October Revolution was not what you call in America the 'Russian Revolution'. It was an invasion & conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at the blood-stained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It can not be understated! Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is Ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators. We can not state that all Jews are Bolsheviks, but without Jews there would have been no Bolshevism. For a Jew, nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood-maddened Jewish terrorists murdered 66 million in Russia from 1918 to 1957.
This history is so convoluted and so much of it opaque. I wonder where the truth lies? In archives? In the akashic records? One day for those who have eyes to see we will know the truth.
I got totally down voted a month ago for saying there's more semitic/Hebrew DNA in Palestinians than in Ashkanazi/European Jews now living in Isreal. Now, there's lots of discussion about around this issue. I love this Great Awakening. 👏💗
Sticky for the well done historical explanation Anon! Thank you for the factual history reminders.
Thanks
GREAT POST
Thanks very much. I have been doing research on the Khazarians for some time now. When i went to look up something in particular in regards to the Khazarian empire, reading the parties involved caught my attention.
It goes back further to Esau/Edom. The Assyrians carried them away, along with "The Lost Tribes" to Northern Iran. This is how you get the Canaanite influence.
Archeological records also support this theme.
The Assyrians were known to brag about their conquests. When they captured another people, they recorded it by creating artwork depicting the people they captured. This was done via carving pictures in stone tablets.
The Israelites they captured had straight noses, hair and features of White people.
The Canaanites they captured had hook noses and features and clothing we see today in the jew population.
No they carry Canaanite blood, possibly Edomite, Ammonite, Amalekite, Hittite, or Philistine blood, not Hebrew blood. Say Palestine --- think Philistine. They are no more entitled to anything than are the KM's
... so Hamas is the real jooooos?
Why don't you educate yourself on this important topic, rather than just take the lazy way of being a dumb troll?
... all I have to do is read his cut and paste.
Very succinct, and reflects my understanding as well. Love that you brought in the Nephilim. Ascension.
I've run across this personality type in my business dealings. You'll meet somebody who is very keen to get in on your business. They portray themselves as a great asset to your endeavors.
You associate with them and carry on, not noticing they are gathering the strings of power to try to take your business away from you.
They scheme and lie their way to power, then when they've gathered support, they make their move to "murder" you and "assume your identity" as business leader. Then you fire them and the snake slithers away.
Some time later you realize they were of Ashkenazi/Khazarian heritage. No wonder. They are forceful and headstrong with no real talent but to lie their way into power.
Hmm, recently I've noticed a poem about The Snake.
A very needed and helpful post. I believe the big solution to this mess is that people are empowered to discern the political and ancestral motivations of the corrupted and murderous individuals causing all of this. Not just "he's a Jew," but which kind of Jew? Judging a book by its cover is one tool used to keep the scales on our eyes, preventing enlightenment and liberation. To help sharpen my own discernment, exactly what is the difference between an Ashkenazi and Khazarian Jew?
Every time we avoid saying Jew when we mean Ashkenazi/Khazarian Jew is a huge step in the right direction.
Stop saying the word Jew entirely! You're doing what the Khazarian wants you to do. Expose him by naming his satanic heritage openly and often! Let it spread like fire.
To assist you with this I will ask you "who was Askenaz?". It's in the Bible. Was he a son of Shem and, therefore, Shemetic/Semetic?
Genesis 10:1-3 --
Noah >> Japheth >> Gomer >> Ashkenaz
So, no. Not of Shem, not semetic.
At least, not in that particular line.
But the jews have mixed a lot.
Consider this, even before Noah:
Genesis 4:15 --
That "mark upon Cain" must have been something that was OBVIOUS to anyone who might encounter him.
Was it the hook nose?
Is there any other feature of ANY particular group of people that is immediately obvious to others as to who they are (other than skin color) than the hook nose?
Jesus, speaking to "jews" of His day --
Cain was the "murderer from the beginning."
Funny just how many statues from antiquity are missing their noses….
“Oh but the ancients considered those to be how the statues breathed!”
“You’re saying that the men who figured out how to build these gigantic stone buildings with perfectly symmetrical, highly intricate stone architecture were retards who thought statues needed noses to breathe? That’s supposed to be more likely than that someone was hiding something?”
Never heard of hook noses being proposed as “the mark of Cain” before. Not sure how it would have survived the flood, but the nephilim seem to have as well, and impossible to say who the sons’ wives were.
So, sociopaths.
Is there a difference between Khazarians and Ashkenazis?
I want to know the difference so well that sharing this information is rock solid.
It is not easy to piece together, because the history has been hidden and suppressed. (Gee, I wonder why ...)
As I understand it, Khazaria occupied territory that is today modern Ukraine, parts of southern Russia, and other modern day countries in the region.
When Khazaria fell, they were Judaists by religion, but surrounded by Christians (Russia and the Byzantine Empire -- aka, Eastern Roman Empire) to the north and west, and Muslims (Persia) to the south and east.
They dispersed, largely westward into modern day Poland. There, they became cryptojews, which is to say they outwardly converted to Christianity, but secretly they practiced judaism and babylonian theology, which included child sacrifice, and the various disgusting ideas taught in the Talmud. They also changed their names and mixed with the Whites, so as to blend in.
They infiltrated Christianity, perverting it to some extent, and eventually would form the Illuminati expressly for the purpose of infiltrating the two power structures of Europe: the Church and the various kingdoms of Europe. We tend today to think of a kingdom as a vast powerful land area, such as England, but most kingdoms of that era in Europe were small. There were 300 kingdoms and princedoms of the Germanic people in central Europe, for example.
But the power structure in Poland was bigger, and that is why so many Ashkenazi jews landed there, eventually.
I think the Ashkenazi came from the Khazars, but where did the Khazars come from?
We are told they came from "central Asia," but what does that really mean? I think they came out of Babylonia, primarily. They can be traced back to the liars in the Bible, that Jesus repeatedly called out, who were part of the capture of Babylon. Some of their ancestors came back into Judea (which had become a Roman province) and others stayed in Babylon (modern Iraq).
Eventually, they migrated into what became Khazaria, about 1,000 years later, and then westward into Poland, Europe, and elsewhere.
None of them were ever Israelites of the Bible, but they have convinced people they were due to their deception.
I wanted to thank you for all the information and clarity you brought to my post today.
The issue of Israel will finally be resolved, and peace finally secured in the Middle East. The precise details of this arrangement is to remain occulted, for now.
What can be revealed, however, is that the non-Semitic origins of the Ashkanazim will be acknowledged, and their real homeland identified as Khazaria. The original plot of the Rothschilds to sacrifice the nation of Israel, which they also created (via the Balfour Declaration), to fulfill their plot to trigger WWIII will also be revealed.
The true Semites—Sephardic Jews of Israel and the Muslims of Palestine—will be united by the acknowledgment of their shared oppression and exploitation at the hands of the Zionists.
Both Crimea and Astana will factor in the Middle East peace agreement as alternate homelands for any non-Semitic Ashkenazi (Khazarian) Jews who find the new arrangement disagreeable and decide to leave Israel.
So my question now is where does biblical prophecy regarding isreal fit in, if this is supposed to be biblical? Care to spend some time explaining that? Would put the cherry on top of this thread
One of my favorite comments on my post today. Thanks for sharing this fren!
Interesting read, thanks for posting.
Thanks for taking the time to read over it fren.
So the idea being in my own words, based on this article, that the jews in isreal truly are khazarian occupiers, the world elite gave them that holy land (why?) And the palistinians are the real jews with the real holy right to the land? Meaning that that feeling of hipocracy everyone feels deep down when they watch this is because of that? So supporting the palistinians is what?
The world elite gave them that holy land because the world elite was also Khazarian, having usurped the leadership of Europe and before that the banking industry.
This article from back in 2014
Leaked report: Israel acknowledges Jews in fact Khazars; Secret plan for reverse migration to Ukraine.
Israel seems finally to have thrown in the towel. A blue-ribbon team of scholars from leading research institutions and museums has just issued a secret report to the government, acknowledging that European Jews are in fact Khazars. (Whether this would result in yet another proposal to revise the words to “Hatikvah” remains to be seen.) At first sight, this would seem to be the worst possible news, given the Prime Minister’s relentless insistence on the need for Palestinian recognition of Israel as a “Jewish state” and the stagnation of the peace talks. But others have underestimated him at their peril. An aide quipped, when life hands you an etrog, you build a sukkah.
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/leaked-report-israel-acknowledges-jews-in-fact-khazars-secret-plan-for-reverse-migration-to-ukraine/
So yes, they have even admitted to the fact that Jews in Israel are occupiers.
More or less, yes.
Because these jews want to implement a One World Government, with themselves as the masters and everyone else as slaves, and occupying the land of Palestine is as good a place as any, especially if they can convince people it "rightfully" belongs to them (playing the morality card), even though it never did.
No, they are arabs.
No, but they did live there long before the jews showed up in 1948. And the jews have consistently been stealing more and more arab land over the past 70 years.
It probably means different things to different people.
Personally, I do not support the Palestinians, other than to recognize that they have a legitimate beef with the jews, who intend to genocide them, and have been doing it, little by little, for 70 years.
Thank you for this reply. Ive been trying to figure out why everyone is feeling a hipocracy vibe from this
Wow. Thank you so much for this enlightening post and thank you to all of the people who commented. It has answered so many of my own questions and I have learned so much invaluable info.
One of the best posts anywhere on this site as most info like this gets suppressed and memory holed.
Thanks for taking the time to read it. Having such a garnered respose was not expected but great appreciated, and even I found some answers to questions that i was curious about in the comments. GAW has a great community and each of us are knowlegable in our own ways. Have a great day!😁
#GoyLivesMatter.
"About 80% of the Palestinians carry ancient Hebrew Blood and thus are true Semites, and hold an un-abandoned, absolute ancestral right to all of Palestine, despite any Khazarian claims, which are all based on lies and political intrigue."
No they carry Canaanite blood, possibly Edomite, Ammonite, Amalekite, Hittite, or Philistine blood, not Hebrew blood. Say Palestine --- think Philistine. They are no more entitled to anything than are the KM's
In the Hebrew language, the word "arab" means "mixed."
They are mixed blood. They mixed with a lot of different people.
Edomites and Canaanites were people that mostly became jews. But both jews and arabs mixed a lot. Neither are a pure blood race.
"Edomites and Canaanites were people that mostly became jews."
Sauce?
The jews themselves state in their Jewish Encyclopedia that Edomites of the Bible are jews today.
Jesus called out the jews of His day has liars, when they claimed to be Israelites.
The Bible gives a history of the race mixing amongst various people, including the Edomites and Canaanites, which produced some of the jews.
But you won't get that story from the "Judeo-Christian" pastors of today. They ignore the parts of the Bible that tell this aspect of the story. Most of them have their mouths firmly attached to jewish ass, which is why there is so much support for the jewish government in Palestine today, masquerading as "Israel."
"Judeo-Christian" pastors are often mis-directed by commentarties of the likes of CI Scofield who was bankrolled by KM's to write the editorial commentary in the marginal notes of Scriptures, marketed among seminarians as the Scofield Reference Bible. Oxford Press who publishes it is KM owned/operated.
"The jews themselves state in their Jewish Encyclopedia... " "Jews" don't say anything. KM's write the narrative for "jews" even as they attempt to write it for Christians, and some Christians have fallen for it, I agree with you. KM's are inventing their own narrative which complement's Scofield's. There is not a jew today who can trace his lineage back to any one of the origianal tribe's of Judah or the Northern Kingdom.
If KM's tell me that Edomites and Canaanites became jews that is only to further their narrative absent having any traceability of anyone - and least of all KM's -- to true Hebrew roots.
Just because a ZIonist may speak Hebrew does not make him a Hebrew.
Generally, I agree.
I only mentioned the Jewish Encyclopedia stating that "Edomites are in modern jewry" because EVEN THEY say it is so.
Not that I take their info to be any sort of authority, but they want the world to think they are "God's chosen people" (i.e. Israelites), all the while they admit they are Edomites (not Israelites).
Just shows that EVEN THEY know they lie about the whole thing.
The Bible traces with great detail the genetic line of the Israelites (This man begat that son, who begat that son, etc.). This is BECAUSE the Bible is a book ABOUT the Israelite people FOR the Israelite people.
It also includes SOME genetic history of other people who interacted with the Israelites, but all of that is secondary, so those other genetic lines are not detailed.
But the Israelites are:
God >> Adam >> Seth ... >> Noah >> Shem >> ... Abraham >> Isaac >> Jacob/Israel >> 12 Tribes (Israelites), including Judah >> ... Virgin Mary >> Jesus/God.
The Edomites came from Isaac >> Esau/Edom. The Canaanites came from Noah >> Ham >> Caanan.
We know that PARTS of the Israelite family tree mixed with these other people (which was a sin), and were from that point on NO LONGER Israelite people, because those parts of the family tree were no longer pure Israelite.
But we don't have a detailed history of it, because the Bible is not primarily about them.
If the true Israelites were offspring of Jacob, and were not allowed to marry outside the family, wouldn't they become inbred? I suspect there is a lot of mixing of groups in this area, just as there was around Ukraine. Who can really lay claim to any land after it has been conquered and re-conquered numerous times? Where is our homeland if American belongs to the Indians? What if our heritage came from numerous places? Why can't we just belong where we are?