Q on Emotional Pushes
Q1988
See how FAKE NEWS works?
See how CLICKBAIT works?
See how EMOTIONAL PUSHES TO TARGETED READERS works?
Q
If you search the Q drops for the word "emotional' you will find several instances where Q elaborates on how emotional responses are used to manipulate people in a number of different ways.
This points to fact that it is important for truth warriors, anons, Q patriots and researchers, to a) be aware of how their own emotions may be being used or targeted and also b) to observe clearly when others are using emotional pushes to manipulate people and to critically evaluate the purpose and intention behind certain narratives.
Dom Lucre's Tunnel Investigation
Dom Lucre has built a big following on X (1 million followers) and has now dubbed himself "The breaker of narratives".
On January 31, he released a "Tunnel Investigation" short film (https://twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1752515648905765363).
🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: Every year, over 1,000 children go missing in the State of New York, and many are never found. New York is ranked 5th in the nation in child abductions. The State also has one of the most extensive tunnel systems in the country, with almost 1,000 tunnels reaching across the entire state. Many are secret.
On January 8th, 2024, clashes broke out at the World Headquarters of the Chabad-Lubavitch Synagogue in Brooklyn New York- known as the “770”.
Footage leaking from the clash revealed that there were secret tunnels dug beneath the synagogue, and millions witnessed the extremely alarming images coming from the videos: a book covered in blood, a child’s highchair, and a soiled mattress.
With reports of widespread cases of child sex abuse occurring within the Chabad; theories began to spread about the true purpose of these tunnels.
Last week, in partnership with Truth Army Films, I went to New York to investigate not only the Chabad Tunnels, but also the underground network of tunnels that run underneath the entire state of New York.
Now, we are releasing our findings to the world.
Watch ‘The Tunnels’ FULL documentary HERE:
Time Stamps:
2:40 - The Unsealed Chabad Tunnel
5:19 - Symbolism in tipped off tunnel
12:53 - Dom Lucre and Truth Army Enters The 770 Chabad Synagogue
6:17 - Child Sex Abuse Victim of The Chabad Synagogue
18:26 - Dom Lucre and Truth Army Films Get Kicked out The 770 Chabad
22:19 - Dom Lucre speaks to the New York locals About Child Trafficking
26:42 - Final Tunnel/Closing
But in this film, there is a rather problematic section starting at 6:17.
https://twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1752515648905765363
Jordan Sather comments:
But for 6 minutes of this film, Dom Lucre "interviews" an Australian man named Manny Waks who gives testimony of child abuse he received when part of an ultra-orthodox synagogue.
Problem is - DOM LUCE DIDN'T INTERVIEW HIM.
Dom and his production team took Waks video and fabricated a set to make it look like Waks was talking to Dom. Manny Waks is disgusted how his testimony was used in this film. He had never heard of Dom Lucre before. How disgusting to make this man's vulnerable testimony and slap it into this shoddy production.
Dom has a history of stealing content and acting like it's his own.
This whole film appears to be a massive money and clickbait grift. Who cares about the truth when you want to be popular, right Dom Lucrative? Engagement is all that matters!
(https://t.me/jordansather/9898)
Waks himself responded to the Dom Lucre film this way:
A shoddy and outrageous piece of “journalism”…for the record, I’m completely distancing myself from Dom’s nonsense. I didn’t give him an interview and I’m appalled that he’s using this unrelated interview for his conspiracy theory.
https://twitter.com/mannywaks/status/1753114223159500813
As someone else tweeted:
@dom_lucre you got som'splainin' to do
@trutharmyfilms you said it was a real interview.... You want to explain yourself now?
Lessons and takeaways
We are living in the midst of a psy-war. In the psy-war, everything revolves around information - true information, fake information, distorted information, information used for purposes as varying as exploitation, manipulation, control and liberation.
One wonders why Lucre and his film team were so willing to insert a section of information that presents a very false impression. Notice how the time in the section is spent focusing on Lucre himself. Apart from creating the impression that he is interviewing Waks, it also makes Lucre himself a feature and aspect of the film.
Why? We expect this sort of behavior from MSM hacks like 60 minutes, but if Dom is truly about exposing truth, then why this?
It's hard to not wonder if Lucre is more interested in his own agenda than the actual truth agenda. He could have easily set the content up in a manner that does NOT create the illusion that he is interviewing the man. Why didn't he?
Perhaps because the interview content has nothing whatsoever to do with New York, or even the USA.
Again, Sather posts:
Manny Waks isn't even from New York, his testimony is related to events that happened in Melbourne, Australia.
How is it relevant to throw his video into this documentary about tunnels in New York?
Plus, nearly every large metropolis has tunnel systems underneath it. And the whole recent Chabad tunnel fiasco in New York didn't have child trafficking going on.
Human trafficking = necessary to expose, but not in shoddy, clickbait ways like this.
Dom is acting like he's doing so much to "expose human trafficking" - when in reality... he's not doing that much. Just fabricating empty conspiracies for popularity. Nasty grift from a lazy "reporter"
https://t.me/jordansather/9900
For me, this situation highlights what to me is an important realization:
The landscape of the narrative war, the psywar, is not simply black and white, or up and down, as if there are only TWO monolithic factions vying for supremacy.
In addition to deep state / Cabal operations that are attempting to perpetuate and defend the Cabal control on the narratives, there are also myriad other actors whose agenda may neither be to support the DS or fight against them. Think opportunistic black marketeers who exploit the chaos and vulnerabilities generated by war.
Moreover, even among the exploiters, some of these will merely be self-interested opportunists, but others may also be Cabal disinfo operations disguised as self-interested grifters, etc. It's important to realize this and keep one's sense of skepticism alive.
Whether you conclude that Lucre is a grifting 'lazy reporter', or someone caught up in his own hype, or a truth warrior who screwed up here, the real point is to pay attention to who you listen to and ALWAYS apply your own critical thinking to the information that comes across your screen, and question your OWN conclusions.
Such a practice is key to the goals of the Q operation.
Q2816
The DECLASSIFICATION of all requested documents (+ more) will occur. This is not a game.
Do not let personal (emotional) desires ("do it now""now""what is taking so long""NOW!") take over.
Logical thinking and strategy should always be applied.
Game-Theory.
I trust in Jesus. The truth will be revealed unto us in time.
It’s all we got.
Yeah but what about in the meantime? Can't just be like,
"Hey do you trust the guys outside the doors to rescue us are really the good guys?"
"Okay well what do we do until Jesus returns? Do we answer the door or not?"
Right. (Agreed.)
The Esquires comment brought this response to mind:
I trust in Jesus. OK, that's a starting point, but what about Jesus then? Is it a one-way relationship?
Maybe Jesus is trusting in you to be an agent for truth and awareness in the world? To be an example of discernment and critical thinking?
I understand and applaud the intent to trust in Jesus. Trusting in Christ is the starting point. But sometimes I think we need to reflect on whether Jesus is also trusting in us, and what he is trusting us to do or not do.
I damn sure don't trust Freemason's!
https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5ozraQo/be-careful-who-you-follow-on-twi/c/
Dom Lucrative
Clever!
😹
Dom Lucre is very hard to get a read on. I enjoy some of his content but I have him in the AJ/Matt Walsh/Stew Peters zone that I suspect someone is behind him and that he's ultimately being used for nefarious purposes. Perhaps just as simply as keeping a list of like-minded people.
I wouldn't have even mentioned it if OP hadn't created this thread--because higher order conspiracies are just too difficult to articulate--but Lucre was recently in an "anti-semitic" dustup with Alex Stein that came off as staged to me. Like maybe Stein had done it to give Lucre some credibility with conspiracy theorists that have an anti-semitic/anti-zionist disposition, and to help his Jewish tunnels video out.
https://twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1752866705980756098
I don’t trust Jordan Sather as well, to me that is a glass house comment. Honestly I have a rule, I do not get emotionally attached or take anything said by these large “digital” personas to heart. I look at their theories/ evidence, read the comments, follow the links, if important enough continue to dig around and see if there is validity. Then draw my own conclusion. I know none of these people personally and I believe strongly we are truly watching a movie. I figure I’ll know who’s who in the zoo when the credits roll. Until then, we pray for discernment and wisdom everyday and hope God sees fit to bless us in such a way. Just MHO.
Personally I have yet to see Sather call out anyone who wasn't already sussy as hell. Dom and Ariel were heavily featured on his last episode of "Clickbait of the Week". All I tend to see is people getting butthurt that he called out their favorite bullshit artist hopium dealer.
I'm always struck by the "I don't trust X" comments. I don't really understand pedes who view this world or the psywar via this lens.
For example, my reference in the post to Sather is because he provided a heads up on this topic (brought it to my attention). Also, I find Sather very credible in his approach - I have similar interests - and I find many of his thoughts about things resonate. (and I also think he is working in a much neglected area of the Truth sphere). But do I "trust" him? For what?
What is there to trust here? What Sather does or does not isn't materially going to impact my life, or my decisions, so where does "trust" even come in to it?
IMO, it's far more important to learn to trust our own capacity to discern and evaluate. I feel like pedes who lead with the "I don't trust X" or "I don't trust Y" thinking perhaps haven't yet learned to trust their own discernment.
Which is OK really, because discernment is a muscle that requires growth, development and muscle-building, but recognizing this is sometimes the hard part.
I agree with much of what you've said, except perhaps the movie motif, which granted, is widely used and means different things to different people.
Maturity of heart and discernment, which includes and involves developing emotional maturity, is much less likely to attach to personas and more likely to relate to ways of thinking, approaches, and histories.
But a lot of folks focus on the personas, and that I think is a mistake.
I would disagree about personas and my own opinion is that discernment involves evaluating the messenger along with his message, especially in this point in time.
Trust is a matter of investing my time in what you have to offer.
The war we are in has everything to do with infiltrators and plants intending to manipulate and corral the narrative. For instance every FBI informant program infiltrating probably every patriot group that exists along with the entirety of Hollywood and the mockingbird media regarding information and narrative seeding.
Personas are a layer to the deception and created intentionally to target a specific audience, Which, in my opinion, when personalities are presented in a forefront manner, should be an immediate red flag.
The CAA and the complete manipulation they have over damn near all things broadcast, televised and presented as news, pop culture or reality is the number one enemy in this chapter of the book.
You don’t think they know how to make someone look like a little guy who is organic and grass roots?
Remember sometimes it’s not the truth that is presented, it’s the truth that was intentionally left out that leads you off the trail and because you trusted them as your hound dog, the chase ends there.
Just the way I see it.
Wow. What an insightful comment! Excellent.
Perhaps I could have phrased my comment differently because it reads like I'm saying personalities and personas are irrelevant. Not at all! As your astute comment highlights.
What I meant by 'focus' was really 'attachment'. Don't attach to personas, as if they are the answer to what you are looking for.
I think a lot of folks get caught up in (attached to) the persona, when very often its a projection, and image. As you say "Personas are a layer to the deception and created intentionally to target a specific audience."
I could say more, but your comment stands alone.
Excellent.
Agreed
I think most of us have also experienced it first hand at this point and are now a little more patient and diligent in our assessments.
Either way, I think that the healthiest approach, is to throw anything and everything on the table to hash it out to test it’s worth.
Ok. Alright. But can I get one of those burritoes, then?
I think it's very important to keep our truth/bs detectors well honed. That's our number 1 job. Number 2 job is understanding what we are seeing.
That's what I love about this platform. Many people chewing on the same information and sharing their understanding of what's going on.
We have our job to do. Our 1st priority of course is our allegiance with God. From there all good things are possible.
Damn! You ARE good!
Lol...☺️
I'm with you on not trusting Jordan Sather. I was following him very early in his career on YT when the Q drops were coming out and really liked him. But over time, the pattern I saw was that Jordan gets sent in to blow up people who are building a following. He was in the movie that David Wilcock and others did (the two guys Ben and ?, can't think of their channel at the moment), Above Majestic, and then afterwards Jordan shits all over David Wilcock. I know lots of people here don't like DW, but I would wager that none of those people who dis him all the time have read The Source Field Investigations, which is a solid piece of work.
Jordan Sather is controlled by somebody in my opinion. And I don't think it's the good guys. Just my opinion.
Edge of Wonder.
I too was in on the infancy days of Sather, found him more relevant back then.
https://castbox.fm/episode/Ep.-23---Ben-and-Rob-from-Edge-of-Wonder-id4354036-id398000367?country=us
PS. As far as I know, the boys from Edge of Wonder teamed up with Seth from Man in America to set up a paid for content media operation. Cannot recall the name, and I haven't listened to Seth for more than two years.
I liked his content in the beginning, but drifted away from it.
Glad to have your opinion!
But I disagree. Which is fine, cos that's what having opinions are all about.
Here's how I would see it: Sather has a style and personality that rubs some people the wrong way. He's a work in progress (like all of us) and I think he's matured significantly over the period of the last 7 years.
But there are VERY few people in the Awakening who are making the effort to challenge the clickbait / grifter / fake / disinfo infiltrations and activities in the Awakening, and for that reason, I think Sather has an important niche.
Doesn't mean he's right all the time, and doesn't mean his personal opinions are gold. But the busting of myths, and the calling out of fakes, clickbaiters and such, is a very important part of continually maintaining the health of the movement, so I like him. And I do not think he's controlled.
But, like you, that's just my opinion.
PS: Ben Chasteen, Rob Counts
Yes! Ben & Rob. I used to watch their shows quite a lot. I enjoyed them. No time these days. I remember back when Jordan Sather was one of the only ones consistently putting out content about the Q drops and how hard it was to find awake people back then, so I was very grateful for Jordan back then. The style and personality you talk about in Jordan strikes me as arrogance. And throughout this Great Awakening, what I have noticed is the hardcore TDS people, vaccine-pushing people, pronoun-obsessed people, never-Trump neocon shills all have one thing in common: arrogance. They're so sure they're right that they miss info that would suggest otherwise. This is probably why I now mostly ignore Jordan Sather. He's arrogant. And pride goeth before a fall. Perhaps I am judging Jordan on his past and not his present. Certainly possible. I even hope that's the case. The more voices for truth out there, the better. And I'm all for the exposing of shills. I just don't like when innocent people who have a body of work to show their honest intentions get slandered by arrogant people who climb the fame ladder that way. I appreciate your response. Nice to have a rational discussion where two people can exchange information and agree to disagree. Now I have your perspective to weigh into my assessment of Jordan next time I run into his stuff. Thank you.
Most welcome, fren.
It's the best. Because it creates stereoscopic vision, where two contrasting perspectives interacting can yield than on perspective alone.
You may be right there. It might well be a blind spot. On the other hand, he calls things out as he sees them, and cops lots of flak for it, so sometimes it takes a harsh personality to dive through the jungle.
If he's a diamond, then he's much more a diamond in the rough. Anyway, for whatever reason, I don't have an issue with this aspect of his character.
I listened to the boys from Edge of Wonder quite a bit up until the time they were purged from youtube. Their willingness to approach topics without attaching too much to their own opinions on those topics was pretty good.
What I liked most, however, was their angles on China and the CCP. For me, that helped to open my eyes to certain aspects of China that I still find useful today. (For example, the conflicts between the Xi faction based in beijing and the Zhang (?) faction based in Shanghai, etc.)
I look forward to the possibility of reviewing more of the 'influencers' with you and getting your angle on those....
Interesting that you bring up the Edge of Wonder guys and their helpful information on China. I have been pondering a lot lately my possibly skewed perspective on China. In the most stressful quarter of my life at the University of Minnesota (which was on a quarter system, not a semester system when I was there in the 1980s when Minneapolis was still a beautiful city full of kindly people), I took three literature classes at the same time trying to knock out the degree requirements for a broader world perspective instead of being American-centric (i.e., what would now be classified as DEI classes). I was a lit major, so I felt pretty clever that I had found a way to fill that requirement and still study something I was actually interested in. The three lit classes I took: Russian Literature, Japanese Literature, Chinese Literature. These were in addition to one other class I had, plus I worked to pay my way through college.
It turned out to be brutal because I had 23 novels to read and 14 papers to write in essentially 10 weeks. This is before the days of laptops. No small feat.
But I think all the time about that quarter because of what I learned. I learned that Japanese literature was of zero interest to me. Like Japanese rock gardens: beautiful, but too controlled. I loved the Russian literature, but it was so dark so much of the time. Full of beauty, but the beauty you see as darkness descends. The beauty as the sunset fades. (Though Evgeny Zamiatin's We is second only to 1984 for dystopian novels in my mind. It is an amazing work exposing communism in all its faults. It should be taught everywhere.)
To my utter amazement, it was the Chinese literature that I most resonated with. I was shocked. Going in, my expectations for the Chinese lit were the lowest. I had read Pearl Buck's The Good Earth so I didn't have a kindly perspective on Chinese culture. How wrong I was. Now, this was literature throughout Chinese history up to the 1980s. I have no idea if China would allow this stuff to be taught in China then or now. But it was literature of real people to me. People in rough circumstances still finding humor in them. I think it reminded me of some of Faulkner's work: post-civil war south, beaten down, but still pushing through and finding humor and redemption as they were trying to stand back up.
Because of reading what I read in that class, I still have this deep affection for the culture that could produce literature like that. The CCP may have destroyed all those people now. But I hope that their DNA has survived in the Chinese people who were some of the earliest surgeons and astronomers and great writers, and that China and the world will be gifted by them finding their way back up through these deeply oppressed people. What great things might they create if they were free?
And may the same be true for America which has lost connection with its roots. When they stopped teaching great literature (including the founding documents), we lost our tether. But I feel like we're going to come back from that. We're going to throw these woke dumbass professors out of Universities and people who truly love their country and what they teach will replace them. Things will look very different then. In the meantime, we have to teach our children ourselves.
Dude rage quit an interview on Alex Stein when he got called out for raising 10k for a documentary, spending 4k of that on gucci clothes, hired a methhead producer and then when he finally gets to New York to interview Orthodox Jews on the tunnel, he just took their word for it with no pushback on top of stealing content for the rest of his "documentary" Afterwards he started a twitter space ranting about how he had 1 million followers and how these "nobodies" don't have a right to ask him questions. Credit to Mersh at ROTC for exposing this grifting faggot and his massively overinflated ego.
Inquiring minds want to know....
What's Mersh, precious? What's ROTC?
Mersh is the guy who called Dom Lucre out the other night. Rotc is a comedy show he co-hosts on rumble called revenge of the cis. Not sure if that show would be up many people's alley here, not really trying to shill for it, but I felt weird not giving credit, kind of like I was stealing a quote and needed to reference the author
Thanks for the heads up. I am not familiar with him but with as many followers as he has, I will probably cross paths with him.
Well, again, I think the main point for me is that it's important avoid engaging in idolization of people - even if they are shouting narratives that seem to align with our biases - and to practice discernment, and question, question, question.
No one's research or reporting will ever be as important as our own, because even if someone is a catalyst or even a major influence on what direction of thought we choose, it's in OUR choice that the power resides.
Dont invest in personalities. Take any information and use logic and discernment to weed out the noise. Then keep it in your back pocket until future proves past.
Eggzacterly.
Yup yup 👍
Nice post and well said. Here is my 2 cents, Dom did build a big following and personally I was enjoying his account not because he had "breaking" information as we all already knew all he talked about, but because this was finally reaching millions upon millions of people world wide FINALLY after all these years of many us trying to just bring truth and save the world so to speak and outside of our echo chamber/think tanks. My personal belief is that he is not a "bad actor" and/or serving the purpose of the cabal and doesn't have bad intentions (besides maybe financially), but imo his message and platform started going down when he started having hissy fits about monetization and what not. Like greed got in the way of the path he was heading. Thing is I understand ppl need to eat and make a living as well, but I personally do not think one should bank on this "movement" to eat as at one point or another something will happen to either keep you in line in a sense and retreat from spitting 100% truth as one will face being demonetized, if that makes sense. I think the same goes for guys like X22 and others.
Taking a step back, I think Dom was not "strong" enough to keep doing what he was doing and the agent Smith DS accounts like Ariel and gang scared him or at least got to him mentally unlike someone like Liz Crokin who has kept beating what almost seemed like a dead horse for years without derailing her truths and message despite those same accounts trying to squash her.
Personally I think we should move on to the next so to speak, we anons want 1 thing and 1 thing only and that is to get the truth out to the masses so humanity can free itself from the iron grip and complete illusion of control they have over us and we should put our energies to just that, but reality is it won't be our anon accounts that get those huge followings because we are anonymous and I think we can all understand how that differs from having your actual name and face and shit out there. Cheers frens happy Friday
Name checks out.
Top Comment, imo.
I agree on so many of these points, and I think the overall evaluation is as likely to be spot on as anything else I've seen.
Dom Lucrative
NAILED. IT.
He is a fucking faggot. This video fakery (vs "just" stealing stuff and watermarking it as his own) is a new (?) low.
lucre /loo͞′kər/ noun Money or profits. Gain in money or goods; profit; riches; -- often in an ill sense. Similar: profitriches Gain in money or goods; profit; riches. (often in a negative sense).
Dom is a Mason he wears the square and compass ring.
As Q said "be careful who you follow"
Symbolism will be their downfall.
Don't trust any of these social media goobers. Take the X Files approach and trust no one.
Great dig. Thank you for helping expose the grifters. It’s nice to finally see some pushback against the likes of people like dom and clandestine.
Thanks for the generous compliment.
I'd like to reiterate what I think is an important point: The landscape of the narrative war, the psywar, is not simply black and white, or up and down, as if there are only TWO monolithic factions vying for supremacy.
Behind this spiritual war, good and evil are battling it out. But that is merely a reflection of the human reality: since the fall, we have been a mixture of good and evil. Some more corrupt, some more righteous, but none being fully one or the other.
So there are people involved in the war that may be driven by ......a mixture of motives. As valuef******deep suggested might be the case above, some indeed start out with good intentions but become distracted or diverted by the regular temptations of human life: fame, money, knowledge.
I'm not convinced that Clandestine is a grifter, although he does seem to have a rather inflated view of his own view, what we would call arrogance. But I don't really pay too much attention to him, so i could not really say.
Every taking head, whether on MSM or social media has their own agendas. If you remember to do your own due diligence, you will find the truth of all things. DO NOT rely on any one individual except yourself when discerning the truth of every talking head's narrative. Period.
Mason?
I unfollowed him last week as I saw that pic with a covered eye and to me that says something else is going on. If he's a Mason then he knows exactly what he is in, a secret society. I'm starting to unfollow many of these large accounts. They didn't get that way by coincidence.
Why did you follow him in the first place? What are your reasons for following him, or anyone on X (or any other platform)?
I'm curious.
He games the system in fascinating ways - making use of community notes or taking leftist positions to expose lies.
Be cautious about everyone. But some content is worth seeing even if you are unclear about about the source.
Great post Another one smoked out.
The glitches in the matrix should be taken seriously. Dom glitched.
Updoogle.
I recommend the comment by VFD above: https://greatawakening.win/p/17sOj3HsDj/x/c/4Z8jPjlejqN
I think he's spot on the money.
And I reiterate a key point of my post: The landscape of the narrative war, the psywar, is not simply black and white, or up and down....
Whether Dom is a deliberate grifter, something worse, or whether fame and fortune got the better of him, we shouldn't dismiss the fact that he's made a contribution by reaching a large number of regulars.
I hope he finds his way.
filthy lucre: <noun> money (used with contempt or condemnation)
You forgot thief.
I’m not really sure about Dom Lucre. But I can see he’s more credible than Ariel.
I think when people start covering this type of content, they feel like they’re really making a difference and getting information out into the world. Somewhere down the line, people start feeling a little bit more superior than others. Also, considering the darkness of the content, I think it messes with peoples minds. Someone may have started out with the best intentions, but dealing with that type of evil every day, I’m sure that isn’t the best for any human soul. I’m hoping he’s taking time off from these information digs, to get whole with God - and continue to move forward, exposing people.
Satan is not going to just sit back, and allow Dom to continue to expose him. He is going to be met with spiritual warfare. If he has 1 million viewers, whatever his intentions, at least the information to getting out. People will do with it what they will, but if somebody’s not reporting on it, then it couldn’t even happened.
Whoever he is… Praying for his safety and salvation.
Insightful and pure-hearted comment.
Thx Fren 🐸🙏
One of Flynns Masonic Digital Warriors. Hard pass.
You need look no further than his name for the truth: Dom Lucre.
lucre noun
Synonyms of lucre
: monetary gain : PROFIT
also : MONEY
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lucre
Why the hell would he do something so stupid? Needless to say he's got some explaining to do! I think his account has been a net positive for the movement up until now, hopefully he can get his head out of his ass, take a breath, and not allow his fame to pervert the mission. Sad
based comment
They. Are. All. In. It. For. Money.
Stop paying them any attention.
All. Of. Them.
The great thing about independent journalism is that there is so much competition, that they have to be accurate and accountable or people will just drift to the next big independent journalist out there.
Never even heard of Dom that I recall
Most if not all prominent social media influencers that cover topics regarding Q drops and/or the GAW should be assumed to be nothing more than sophist paytriot turncoat grifters.
Anons work for free. If a persona or outlet is monetized then they by default become untrustworthy sources and should be consumed as if a grain of salt.
How the Hell some anons get suckered into emotional attachment to these personas is the perfect example of how they are successful at their dubious tradecraft: sophistry. It's literally no different than normies trusting the MSM, you're just eating from a different troph.
Don't trust any of them! Trust yourself. Do your own research & baking. Have faith in God & the plan/movies/operators/45.
I made this graphic in 2021 to illustrate part of the dynamic that the Q-related information flowed through.
https://files.catbox.moe/rry758.jpg
This was when Q was posting, but the Great Awakening has moved well beyond Q and the Q operation, so I think that a newer, similar chart could be mapped for how the general Awakening truth gets out there and reaches the rest of the world.
Point being, anons have our role, but we are part of a much larger army and a much larger operation. Anons are like the marines, or the special forces. But the information needs to be disseminated to the whole of the Awakening forces, and as such, people in the position of someone like Lucre are a key part of it all. IMO.
As long as we understand that not everyone can be anon, the rest of what you say resonates.
I appreciate the deep dive on this guy. I had him pegged as a "paytriot" - someone trying to cash in with clicks and massive social media fame on the populist movement. For me, it was less based on his content, but on the way his content suddenly started appearing on populist/MAGA forums and social media outlets all over the place in what looked to be an inorganic way. He'd post something, and immediately, it'd be all over forums like these and making the rounds through the "retweet" circuits. When that regularly happens, it looks like what the Left does with NYT, WashPo, and certain "experts say." Someone's trying to broadcast their message. I've seen this kind of thing out of "conservative" commentators and it turns out they're using anonymity or fake accounts to boost their own content and make themselves look like a bigger deal than they actually are. Dom started showing up here, regularly boosted to the top of the "hot" list, and often stickied. That's when I started being skeptical.
I tend to be a very logic-driven person when evaluating this kind of thing. When I went through grad school, they drilled us hard on evaluating the source of various information to assess biases. And with "news," it has now fused with entertainment. Social media personalities act like celebrities trying to create cults of personality, build "brands," market themselves, and most importantly, get filthy rich doing it. This kind of thing is very, very lucrative (Lucre wasn't chosen by accident, as a handle, I suspect. It means wealth).
As others have said, you can disregard all of that "assess the source" and simply evaluate the content on its own merit. There's value in that. But, it also opens you up to confirmation bias. People post what you want to hear. You read it, and it conforms to how you see the world, so you accept it even if it's BS. This guy seems to prey on doing stuff like this. So, we do have to assess credibility. We should know that clearly by now. Everyone who's ever come out to make claims against Trump, once we find out their backgrounds, has a list of red flags a mile long - see E. Jean Carroll as the most recent example. The lady's a sex-craved lunatic with a penchant for rape fantasies, and lying about her sexual history. You can't just take her word without assessing the source.
TDLR: I'm not on the Dom Lucre money train.
Well-stated and very important considerations to bear in mind always.
Just as when one writes (or speaks) they need to consider their audience, they’re doing so in order to convey information and/or theories-concepts in the most effective way possible. The beasts also consider their audience and do the same, but effectiveness to them is deceit and manipulation and usually for nefarious purposes. So it’s imperative to research the authors/speakers background in an attempt to determine if they have an ulterior motive.
Beyond that, finding out what conflicts of interest may affect what’s being relayed to the public will have another impact on the validity of the information being presented. “Experts say”, as you cite, is one example of this. “A sizable majority of people polled say” is another example when considering that beasts carefully choose the particular people to poll to get their desired outcome, use it as adding weight to their claims with “official sounding” ‘data’ (sic) to back it up.
Your perception regarding behavior is also important, perhaps more difficult for many to grasp. I feel that a lot of (though not all) anons are more naturally attuned to noticing these types of changes and trying to understand what they arise from. I think even during the infancy of the plandemic, for example, many people had heightened awareness that something was very amiss, that there was some sort of nefarious ulterior motive in play. Intuition. Ignore it at your peril.
I have yet to find one big name influencer who wasn’t a grifter or disingenuous. At least Alex jones had his own personality and got fired up, this new wave of “journalists” are dull and force fed it seems. They also are constantly “exposing people” and have yet to ever release anything noteworthy that we didn’t know.
Everyone on this forum should know by now that Truth Social/Twatter LARPs should be paid no mind. Entheos is the only one who's actually nailed his projections and deltas but he's not blabbling about 'what's coming' or using gematria numerology to pin a fake date 'shit's gonna go down'.
I think this guy is about his Self Fame first.