đ§”JEWISH CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CHINESE REVOLUTION.
In a July 9th, 2012 piece entitled âA Jew In Maoâs Chinaâ by Laura Goldman for âThe Schmoozeâ of the Jewish Daily Forward, she revealed, âIn fact, 85 to 90% of the foreigners helping the Chinese at the time of the Communist takeover were Jewish. This included the daughter of the founder of the brokerage firm Goldman Sachs, who left the comfort of her Park Avenue home to assist the Chinese.â In conjunction with these startling anomalies, the US government had a base in Tianjin from 1945-1947. Tianjin was home to a sizable Jewish community, particularly Russian communists. It was from the Tianjin base that the Dixie Mission of the OSS trained, financed and armed none other than Mao Zedong and his merry band of ârevolutionariesâ to fight the Japanese.
Let's delve into Red Chinaâs Jewish patrons. And founders. If any of you are curious to view a photograph of any of the individuals being discussed here, I will leave a link below each one.
Link to Twitter 𧔠in its entirety https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747282811998908640?
- Grigori Naumovich Voitinsky (birthname: Zarkhin) â Russian Jew. One of the founders of Soviet Sinology. Handler of Chen Duxiu. Cofounder of the Chinese Communist Party, which he and his colleagues established in 1920. Bolshevik. The process of forming the party in its nascent stages can mostly be attributed to his strategic thinking. Bolshevik propaganda was disseminated through the Shanghai Chronicleâwhich he managed. He can indeed be identified as the godfather of Chinese communism as well as other branches of communism in the Asian world.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747283444135088537?
- Manfred Stern aka Emilio KlĂ©ber aka Lazar Stern aka Moishe Stern aka Mark Zilbert aka General Kleber â Ukrainian Jew. Leader of the International Brigade in Spain. Bolshevik. Helped put down the anti-Soviet rebellion in Mongolia. Became the GRUâs chief spy in the US with his missions centered around stealing American military secrets. Would become the chief military advisor in the JiangxiâFujian Soviet, with Mao, Zhu De and others reporting directly to him.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747283769931767901?
- Solomon Adler â Jew with origins from Karelitz, Belarus. US Treasury Department economist, Treasury rep in China during WW2. Pegged as a Soviet spy by Whittaker Chambers, returned to China to spearhead translating Maoâs works into English. Was also with the International Liason Department, a vital organ of the CCP whose functions included foreign intelligence.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747283769931767901?
- Henry Kissinger â Among historyâs worst human beings. Involved in a slew of genocides, massacres, war crimes, destabilizations and other acts of psychopathyâparticularly in Asia. Masterminded the opening of trade with China and sold out Americaâs manufacturing power to the Chinese. Grandsire of transmogrifying China into a commie state to a cappy state.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747284517071581328?
- Jakob Rosenfeld aka General Luo â Austro-Hungarian Jew. Minister of Health in Maoâs provisional government and top Mao advisor. Served in the Chinese Communist Force from 1941 on and participated in the Chinese Communist Forceâs march on Beijing. Settled in the Entity after the Communist takeover of China was complete. Statue of him was erected in his honor in Junan county, Shandong and a massive exhibit was named after him in 2006 in Beijingâs National Museum of China.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747284712224170471?
- Sidney Rittenberg â Charleston, South Carolina Jew. Descendant of slave-owners. First American to join the CCP. Close advisor to Mao, Zhu De, Zhou Enlai and other high-up CCP leaders. Trusted translator of the Chinese Communist ârevolutionâ. Married into the Chinese family of Wang Yulin. Cultural Revolution supporter. Played a key role in transmitting Chinese Communist propaganda for Xinhua and Radio Peking. Ascended to the head of the Broadcast Administration â i.e. propaganda production â in an unprecedented move that nobody ever thought could be held by a foreigner. But in Communist China of course, Jews werenât foreigners but âcomradesâ. He returned to the United States in 1980 to found Rittenberg & Associates, a company which became a vital go-between for American corporations and China.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747285282691379358?
- Sidney Shapiro aka Sha Boli (Ancestor of Ben Shapiro) â New York Ashkenazi Jew. Member of the Chinese Peopleâs Political Consultative Council. Head of Communist Chinaâs propaganda apparatus. Top translator, writer and publisher of works on China, as well as an actor in Chinese films focused on American villainy. Conducted extensive research into Jews in China and got the works translated into Hebrew and published in the Entity. In December of 2014, the China International Publishing Group announced it was establishing a Sidney Shapiro Research Center in his honor to investigate model criteria for translation between Chinese and English.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747286564416147771?
- Israel Epstein â Polish Jew. Anti-Japanese spy. His father was a Bolshevik agitator. Member of the NKVDâs China divison. Maoâs Minister of Finance/Appropriations. Honored by Mao, Zhou Enlai, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao. Member of the CCP and editor of China Reconstructs/China Today. His wife was a top contributor to one of the most widely used Chinese-English dictionaries published in China.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747286862186557569?
-
Frank Coe â Richmond, Virginia Jew. Treasury Department official from 1934-1939 who worked with the Silvermaster spy ring that featured Harry Dexter White at the head of Operation Snowâthe precusor to Pearl Harbor. Friend and co-conspirator of Solomon Adler. Key player in Maoâs Great Leap Forward. https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747287295823093935?
-
Robert Lawrence Kuhn â Jewish investment banker, Kissingerite and international corporate strategist with an âexpertiseâ in China. Heâs been advising the CCP on economic policy, science, technology, media, culture, US-Chinese relations and international communications for over 20 years. https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747287486848495791?
-
Mikhail Borodin aka Mikhail Gruzenberg â Jew from Vitebsk, Belarus. Top lieutenant of Lenin. After the Bolshevik takeover, he engaged in spying activities in the UK ZOG, US ZOG and Mexico. Then led a group of Soviet advisors in Guangzhou. He negotiated the First United Front between the Chinese Nationalist Party of Sun Yat Sen and the Chinese Communist Party. Under his guidance, both parties reorganized on Leninist dogma and organized training institutes for mass organizations, such as the Peasant Training Institute, where none other than a young Mao served, and the Whampoa Military Academy. He arranged shipments of Soviet arms and kept a balance between the radical communists and the âbourgeiosâ Nationalists.
-
David Crook â Staunchly anti-Russian Jewish supremacist from the UK. Fought with many other Jews in the International Brigade during the Spanish Civil War. Got recruited by the NKVD as a result of his actions in Spain and was sent to China where he also doubled as a British intelligence agent, working with communists against the Japanese. An architect of Chinaâs foreign service and active in the CCPâs theft of private property, aka âland reformâ.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747288922239995978?
- Adolph Abramovich Joffe â Turkic Karaite Jew from Crimea. From a very wealthy family. Associate of Trotsky and Hungarian-Austrian Jew Alfred Adler. Ally and supporter of Lenin. Chairman of the Petrograd Military Revolutionary Committee that overthrew the Russian Provisional Government. Ambassador to China, signing agreements with Sun Yat-Sen and overseeing the distribution of aid and weapons to the Kuomintang as well as cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Chinese communists.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747289136870944875?
- Richard Frey aka Richard Stein â Jew from Vienna, Austria. Arrived in China in 1939 and joined in operations against the Japanese. Member of the CCP and took part in the 7th National Congress of the Communist Party of China in Yanâan â the political and military base of the Communist Party of Chinaâ as a guest auditor. Pioneer of Integrative Medicine Treatment in China. He founded and managed the first computer database for the medical information center in Beijing. Chairman of the Information Institute and curator of the Medical Academy of Sciences of China. Helped build relations between Austria and China. Honored by Hu Jintao.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747289400885596260?
- Shafick George Hatem aka Ma Haide â Syrian-Lebanese Jew often mistaken as a Maronite who lived in both upstate NY and Lawrence, MA. First traveled to Chinaâs Shanghai with Jewish colleagues (and communist agents) Lazar Katz and Robert Levinson. Traveled to communist HQ in Baoâan (modern-day Zhidan) to directly assist Maoâs troops and personally examine Mao to dispel rumors of Maoâs impending death via a mysterious disease. Chief organizer for recruiting foreign medical personnel to treat Chinese communist forces fighting Japan in northern China. Became a public health official in China after the communist victory in 1949 and holds the distinction of becoming the first foreigner granted Chinese citizenship. Known as the âAmerican Physician Savior to Modern Chinaâ.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747289684818984999?
- Hans Shippe aka Morzec Grzyb â Jew from Krakow, Poland. Germany Communist Party member. Soviet journo. Joined Chinese communists in Guangzhou as a translator and interviewer, spreading interviews with top CCP leaders including Mao. Associate of Shafick George Hatem (Ma Haide). First Jew to fall on the battlefield in Chinaâs war against Japan. Monument erected in his honor by Chinese communists in 1942 in Shandong province.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747290368423453070?
- Ruth Weiss aka Wei Lushi â Jew from Vienna, Austria. Said to be the last surviving European eyewitness of the Chinese communist takeover of China. Top educator at the Jewish School in Shanghai, the School of the Chinese Committee of Intellectual Cooperation and West China Union University. Did propaganda work for the Publishing House for Foreign Literature and financial work at the China Welfare Fund. Named one of eleven foreign experts by the Communist Party of China that were part of membership of the Chinese Peopleâs Political Consultative Conference in 1983.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747291073943118193?
-
Rewi Alley â Jew, homosexual and probable pedophile from New Zealand. Associate of Ma Haide, Ruth Weiss and Hans Shippe. Became a secret member of the CCP in the late 20s/early 30s and by 1932, was carrying out mission after mission for the communists. Set up the Chinese Industrial Cooperatives to bring in foreign and local high-born money for the war against Japan. Credited with introducing âguerilla industryâ to China. Became a top propagandist for the new regime, writing works praising the CCP and its actions nationwide, including the Great Leap Forward. Bragged of his âfamilialâ ties to the CCPâs top brass, including Mao. Rewi Alley Memorial Hall and Research Centre at Lanzhou City University College erected in his honor in 2017. Also honored with the Queenâs Service Order by the New Zealand ZOG and was instrumental in forging strong bonds between Beijing and Wellington.
-
Philip Jacob Jaffe â Ukrainian-Russian Jew from NYCâs Lower East Side. Co-founder and policymaker of the Committee for a Democratic Far East Policy (CDFEP). Associate of Israel Epstein and Gunther Stein, who were both CDFEP members. Function of the CDFEP was to instill communism deep into Chinese society through anti-Japanese propaganda. Met with Mao as early as 1924. Published the journal âAmerasiaâ with money from the Judeophilic Vanderbilts. Amerasia was raided by government authorities for publishing classified materials and Jaffe along with his colleagues and his presumed source, a Jewish Office of Naval Intelligence officer named Andrew Roth, were arrested for espionage. Was a friend and financier of Thomas Arthur Bisson aka T.A. Bisson aka Arthur, a propagandist for Chinese communism in America, suspected Soviet spy who collaborated with Jewish agent of the Soviets Joseph Bernstein, and prolific anti-Japanese writer.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747292982867354075?
- Eva Sandberg aka Eva Xiao â Polish-German Jew. Soviet citizen and spy. Known as the âOnly White Western Woman in Yananâ, she married Chinese poet Xiao San, an old classmate and boyhood friend of Mao. She helped Xiao run the editorial department at the Lu Xun Academy of Arts and disseminate communist thought. Was also just one of three Soviet women in all of Red China.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747293187087954210?
- Ursula Kuczynski aka Ruth Werner aka Ursula Beurton aka Ursula Hamburger aka Sonja (codename) â Prussian-German-Polish Jew. Her father, Robert Rene, was a well-known and wealthy economist. Her Yahoudling husband, Rudolf Hamburger, was an architect of the German Communist Party and also a Soviet spy who worked with her in China. Infiltrated MI5, the Royal Air Force and the OSS. Eulogized by the Jew York Times as a âColorful and Daring Soviet Spyâ. Attained the rank of Colonel within the Soviet military. Awarded the Order of the Red Banner for her espionage in China. She ran a spy ring in Shanghai and her missions prominently featured the interception of Japanese communications and sabotage of Japanese military positions in Manchuria. She stored weapons and secured bomb-making materials for Chinese communist guerillas. It is said that Japan would not have pulled out of Manchuria had it not been for her work. Collaborated with the Rosenbergs, David Greenglass, Harry Gold and Klaus Fuchs to get classified nuclear armaments info to the Soviet Union and is credited particularly with being responsible for the transmission that started the Soviet nuke program. Fuchs, for the record, was recruited into services for the Soviets by none other than her brother Jurgen Kuczynski, an internationally renowned economist.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747293510925971892?
Continued in comments.....
In more recent years, Zionist controlled World Bank, IMF and Federal Reserve funded the rise of modern China and built the enormous real estate bubble there.
This was their running plan of ditching the sinking ship of American Financial System and moving to the CCP NWO financial system. Once they loaded up all their wealth into the new ship, they started realising that the new ship was not under their control. Kek!
A similar thing happened with the Soviet Union. They kind of lost some of the control during Stalin's time, then eventually SU collapsed. They tried to regain control with Yeltsin, but Putin had other plans. They've been throwing tantrums since 2014 because of that.
Both Russia & China got communism imposed by the Khazarians and both managed to somehow escape their clutches, though they took different paths.
Meanwhile, in the USA....
Yep, and it has been much better understood, whereas the Chinese Jewish connection has been hard to dig up.
I have written a few deep digs in which I make a case that Stalin turned against his masters at some point and started wiping out the Khazarian control of Soviet Union. This is what we are taught in history books as "purges of his close associates" because he was "crazy". He was removing all the people who had been close to Trotsky - who was the real Puppet of the Khazarians.
The fact that Lenin pushed forward Stalin instead of Trotsky at his deathbed makes me think that Lenin already knew what was going on and tried to control the situation. It was probably one of the biggest acts of kindness towards humanity.
Another fact people frequently miss and confuse is the genocide in Soviet Union. There were two distinct kinds of genocide. The one Trotsky carried out against White Christians during the 20s. And the one Stalin carried out by starving the collectivists - primarily the Khazarians in the Ukraine.
I had also outlined that by the time they murdered Stalin, he had already pushed the USSR pretty far over the point of no return. The subsequent leaders seemed to alternate between the Khazarian backed and Stalinistic anti-Khazarians, until USSR was really weak and the patriots in the US could finish it off by Gorbachev's time.
It is no coincidence that the Cuban missile crisis happened during Kruschev and he lost his position in under 2 years after that. The Khazarians were pretty desperate to start a nuclear war before their favourite puppet state collapsed, but luckily it never came to fruition, and no doubt it will be proven in future that many many patriots on both sides were behind making it not happen.
Agreed fren, with one exception.
The Soviet Union was one of their favorite puppet states. They had two more, China which was in the process of getting built up and...well, the USA of course. Still #1 favorite, for their bidding.
SU was interesting and weird, it started as their strongman and a controlled opposition to the US/"capitalism", then morphed into something else, during Stalin's time, as you also mention. Eventually its internal contradictions made it collapse.
It remains to be seen if the US follows a similar fate of collapse, or if it can remove the occupation entity without collapsing. It has some advantages over the SU but also some disadvantages.
I agree and I stand corrected.
What happened in USSR also happened in USA. The Khazarian Puppets developed their own brain and went against their masters in one way or another.
This is the essence of Human History. If there is one thing that has repeated again and again in history, you can corrupt leaders all you want, you can control them all you want, and you can prop them up. Once they are up there, they always turn against you when they find out the true extent of your evil. With one exception. Hussein. Who was their creation from day one, and putting him up there was their centuries of wet dreams come true.
The only difference between USSR and USA is that USSR was a fast burn experiment, whereas USA was a slow burn experiment.
I strongly believe that the Q team learnt valuable lessons from the collapse of USSR and the vacuum it left that was exploited by the Khazarians so quickly.
The current operation is a culmination of all the lessons learnt from all the smaller battles against them, and everything has been set in place so that the collapse will actually be a controlled demolition of the Khazarians and their puppets and puppet system.
Very well said.
Why do you think that? What evidence is there that the Stalin SU wasn't completely controlled by the central bankers, primarily through the Rockefeller coalition?
Every move or advancement made by the SU under Stalin that I have looked at has a direct connection back to either the Rockefeller coalition, the Nazis coalition (an arm of the Rockefellers/Rothschilds/Cabal) and/or the Central Banking system (ditto). Stalin's USSR played its role perfectly in setting up the Cold War, which was an essential part of their plan leading to where we are today. What exactly makes you think they "lost some of the control?"
I suggest rather, that looking at those years shows exactly what Controlled Opposition looks like.
Exactly on cue. It had to collapse to move onto the next phase. The next generation (iteration) of the Dialectic Running in Reverse had to forget how bad the world was during the "Red Scare." They had to lose that context to be able to start to think "what's so bad about Communism anyways?"
I suggest there is not a single piece of evidence that stands up to scrutiny that suggests they "somehow escaped their clutches." They just got better at hiding their clutches. Nothing more.
I don't know what you are trying to say.
I didn't mean to imply the Nazis were "bad." The vast majority were just regular people being led around by propaganda, mostly done using an association fallacy. For example, saying that "the Jews" destroyed their economy was one of the biggest pieces of propaganda used by the Nazis. These statements worked because they were mostly true, but they contained a built in association fallacy. It wasn't "the Jews" that did it. The vast, vast majority of Jews had nothing to do with it. It was really just a small group of people. Most of that group called themselves Jews, some did not. The Rockefellers for example played a huge part in the destruction of the German economy, but they weren't blamed at all. Instead of being blamed, the Nazis were largely funded and armed directly by Rockefeller. In other words, the Nazi propaganda, instead of naming the real enemy (Rothschild/Rockefeller, etc.) put the blame on a larger group ("the Jews") that were mostly completely innocent; just regular people trying to live their lives.
Now, don't get me wrong. A huge part of the purpose of those actions was the creation of the State of Israel, but again, it was a tiny group of people, when compared to the larger group of "the Jews" that were complicit in those actions, even if it seems like those actions were for "the Jews". Indeed, most of the Jews didn't want to move to Israel. The Cabal had been trying to get them to move there for over a hundred years. It wasn't until the Nazis forced them into Palestine (with economic incentives to get them to move there), and all the rest of the countries except Palestine closed their borders to Jewish refugees that so many Jews moved there.
The top level Nazis were agents of the Cabal, working for them to move the Jews to Jerusalem, funded by Rothschild and Rockefeller. The entire rest of the group of Nazis were just regular people, believing what the propaganda told them to believe, because it was mostly true, just not the whole truth.
Weâll see in November.
The Goldsmith / money changer trick
I managed to keep the post up this time and people were engaged in discussion which was great.
I remember when this site was first made, and I mentioned the Jews or used the K word, I was banned.
My how the tables have turned!
The Great Awakening is actually ... awakening.
Go figure lol
And noticing.
It depends on context and accuracy and sticking to the side panel rules.
Perhaps, but it is possible to be contextually compliant, accurate, and adhere to the rules and still have important pieces of evidence and/or conversation removed. My experience suggests it is sometimes more dependent on how any particular mod feels at any one moment in time, and which mod is deciding on what's "important to see" or "must be removed" than the content itself.
Censorship is like that , such is life. Learning to separate truth from half truth is hard. Listen to that still small voice
We aren't perfect clones of each other fren.
I have no idea what you are intending to convey with this statement.
https://twitter.com/da_underlord/status/1747294136208642251?
In conclusionâand a damn clear conclusion at thatâthereâd be no communism in China without the contributions of these Jews and many others still to be discovered and documented. From the subversive efforts of Gayn and Kuczynski, to the state-building efforts of Epstein, Chandler and Shapiro, to the primordial efforts of Stern and the godfather of them all, Voitinsky.
Stern and Shapiro? As in Ben Shapiro? Naw, he loves America too much. Q dis say he was saving Israel for last, but it is odd that "Israel" is trickling out now from a source who posts on a site that not to many eyes see. Hmmm, is GAW a Q clearing house for upcoming moves?
A spy that you think "ya, they might be a spy" is not a very good spy. A spy that you think "they can't possibly be a spy" is a spy doing their job exactly as intended, which is guiding the narrative in certain directions.
That is what the controlled opposition system is designed to do; create a bunch of different boxes of beliefs in opposition, a whole slew of "theses" and "anti-theses" with a predetermined "synthesis" to which the whole Wheel of Beliefs guides society to.
He may say he loves this country but a J is always a J first. This is why they were kicked out of so many countries. They can't be made citizens, because they're incapable of showing allegiance to anything other than themselves.
Look at what happened with Candace. Yes he hung onto her for a while, but then the pressure from Rabbi Schmuley became too much to bear. They always stick with their own in the end.
Wow. Very informative. And coupled with the information in that super long video about WWII/ Hitler it all makes sense. Even as a kid it was shocking to me that we were in alliance with communists during WWII. Sadly, seems like the bad guys did win. And all the fake wars against communism were just that ways to kill off good honest American boys.
Yes. Drew a blank on the name. Thanks.
if you think communism is bad, wait until you find out what they were funding in the Caribbean
I am intruigued.
The "Dutch" ran the slave trade.
sure the Dutch colony of New Amsterdam.
I love new rabbit holes. We already know who set up shop in Newport, and who ran the transatlantic slave trade. So it would not surprise me one bit to learn they were behind colonizing the Caribbean to dominate sugar and rum production.
Next take a look at the Soviet revolution
Or the silent American one.
Or the British one.
How far back does this crap go, anyway?
Was there a Roman one?
Egyptian?
Israelite?
Maybe this can help answer your question.
THE COMPLETE LIST OF "1030" JEWISH EXPULSIONS IN HUMAN HISTORY.
https://archive.org/details/TheCompleteListOfThe1030JewishExpulsionsInHumanHistory
It began before 139 BC with the Romans
Iâve got a running suspicion that the Hyksos or Canaanite/Phoenician/Carthaginians/Edomites/Elamites, having managed to blend in, are the root people, they having adopted Babylonian practices, from which Hinduism seems to have grown as well.
Just because some chameleon says they are a thing does not make it so. Neither does my expectation that itâs fundamentally someone else make it not so. We will find out at some point.
Bingo.
What if they (whoever they are) did that same thing to the Israelites/Jews/whatever term you want to use?
Much like how a catholic priest who rapes boys appears to be Christian, and may even be perceived as âfaithfulâ, but probably wonât be welcomed into the pearly gates.
We must search, and be slow to judgment. This knot is very tangled, but will be exposed. Light up the dark.
Thank you for that link
https://lipstick-and-war-crimes.org/mao-yale-man-rothschilds-create-peoples-republic-china/
Why do 90% of blacks hate all white people? Because a certain group of people in government and media tell them that white people are the reason they are oppressed so they therefore hate all white people. The same as the Jews, certain people in charge tell the people that the Jews are the source of all the worlds problems so 90% of the population hate all the Jews. See anything similar in this? Not all white people are bad and not all Jews are bad. We both just want to live a peaceful a profitable life. It is the people in charge---all races----that are stirring and trying to make people choose sides and hate one another.
Talmudic jews have it engraved in their scripture to view non jews as inferior, and thay any act of subversion is not only permitted but is obligatory.
So do Muslims. Everyone except Muslims are infidels. They hate Jews and it depends on the sect of Islam because they hate each other. Who is the father of hatred?
All the more reason to leave the jews and muslims to kill each other without interfering. To hell with them all.
Oh itâs coming.
Mohammed was full blood jew and his wives and close associates were jewish.
A very important detail about muhammadâs jewish ancestry is that it was a member of Banu Hashim clan of Quraysh tribe â note, HaShem! â BanĆ« HÄshim (Arabic: ŰšÙÙ ÙŰ§ŰŽÙ ââ) is a clan in the Quraysh tribe with a unique maternal bloodline of Israelite ancestry through Salma bint Amr of Banu Najjar. This makes Banu Hashim both an Ishmaelite and Israelite tribe.
âBanuâ simply means âthe children ofâ or âdescendants ofâ in Arabic, usually translated just as âtribeâ. âHaShemâ simply means âthe nameâ in Hebrew. HaShem is just 72 names of the jewish g-d that jewish rabbis recite all the time. Literally âthe children ofâ or âdescendants of the jewish g-dâ, which directly links all islam to the jewish g-d.
Aminah, muhammadâs mother was also jewish by blood according quran. She was a member of the same tribe as his father and a descendent of the jew Ibrahim (Abraham) through his son Ismail (Ishmael). Which means according jewish law Muhammed was full-blooded jew, accepted as a jew in jewish community.
And not only he was jewish by blood, he was jewish by faith. As every chosen entitled blood jew, he was circumcised. Not only he lacked his male part, but he even said to be born circumcised which is considered special virtue among jews. Even jewsus Christ âking of judahâ had to be artificially circumcised. But he revered born disability a lot.
Born disability is extremely revered by any Abrahamic religion, and personally highly praised by jewish messiah jewsus christ. As well as conscious self-mutilation.
Matthew 19: 12 - 12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their motherâs womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heavenâs sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.
Matthew 5: 29-30 - 29 And if thy right eye offends thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. 30 And if thy right hand offends thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
John 9 - Now as Jesus passed by, He saw a man who was blind from birth. And His disciples asked Him, saying, âRabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?â
Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?
Jesus answered, âNeither this man nor his parents sinned, but that the works of God should be revealed in him.
https://whitedeathofislam.deathofcommunism.com/mohammed-the-jew/
Mohammed was not a Jew of the tribe of Judah. He was a descendant of Ismael son of Abraham. Same family but was not of the Promise.
The only problem I have with the page you linked is this quote from the top of the page: "...Jesus is a full-blooded jew personage of the jewish Gospel myth."
Sauce: https://christogenea.org/podcasts/exactly-why-jesus-christ-not-jew
Stop!
This is a distraction from the truth.
When we say "The Russians did this" or "The Germans did that" or "The Japanese did such and such" we are NEVER talking about each, specific individual of that group. We are talking either about the majority or about those of that group who were/are in power.
You are ignoring the CONTEXT of the statement, and then claiming that the statement is not true.
That is not a valid argument.
It is a logical fallacy known as "context dropping."
Is it true that "The Soviets brutally murdered their enemies?" Yes -- when you understand that the CONTEXT of that statement was about Lenin, Stalin and their thugs and how they murdered tens of millions of Russians and Ukrainians.
If you deny that is true, they you are attempting to change history.
Is it true that "The Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor?" Yes -- when you understand the CONTEXT that the Japanese government leadership and the individuals in the military, especially the bomber pilots, did exactly that. We could talk about how FDR pushed them into it and knew about it and let it happen, but that is another discussion. If you claim "Oh! But not ALL Japanese did that!" Well ... duh! That is not the CONTEXT within which such a statement is made.
And if YOU say, "90% of blacks hate all white people." I could say, "But but but ... not ALL blacks do! And maybe its only 80%!" Then I would be saying something stupid because your generalization is GENERALLY true, even though there are exceptions to the rule.
And while we are at it ... have you EVER met or known of a jew who (a) knew that many jews throughout history have been destructive of their host countries, (b) AND CRITICIZED their fellow jews for it?
I have known of exactly TWO: Benjamin Freedman and David Cole (not his real name). About 90% of jews look the other way when their own RABBIS are torturing children and imprisoning women, or digging tunnels for some mysterious reason under NYC, or bombing the USS Liberty and murdering US sailors (on purpose and knowingly) and those are just a TINY fraction of all the harm many jews have caused -- and yet, you will be hard-pressed to find any jews who ever criticize such behavior. Probably because their religion teaches them that it is not morally wrong to do such things to non-jews.
So, let's stop with this "but not ALL of the 'X' people are that way!"
Yes, we KNOW that. But MOST of them (or the leadership) are, when the context is understood -- just like your 90% generalizations.
On a side note, I agree with you that most blacks have a hatred for Whites, but that is primarily due to their indoctrination towards hatred.
But 90% of the world hates jews? I doubt that. Most people don't have a clue about how harmful many jews have been to the rest of the world for many, many centuries -- probably because the jews work very hard to prevent that discovery of the truth (yet, another harm inflicted).
Except that that is exactly the context in which the statement is made. You are "dropping" essential context in making this and similar statements.
False. The rhetoric, the intent behind the phrase "the Russians did this" is to create a generalization fallacy. That is the purpose of the phrase.
If I were to instead say, "Stalin and his thugs did this," that would be perfectly clear to everyone exactly who I am blaming for some action. When I say "the Russians did this" it may be clear to some (very, very few), but to the vast majority, it would be "those damn Russkies!" "those Commie Bastards!" "we need to wipe them off the face of the Earth!" It is exactly such rhetoric, and the built in association fallacy, that is used to justify every war. If the real enemy named is some specific person or small group, then the effort would be to take out the specific person or small group. When the false enemy named is an entire group of people, then the effort is to take out the entire group.
Why don't we end wars with assassination or targeted attacks? Is it because "assassination is too hard?" Of course not. That is a lie told to us by compromised entities all working together in Controlled Opposition. We don't end wars with targeted attacks because "eliminating the enemy" is not the purpose of war. The purpose of war is to create fear, an illusion of a false enemy, and to steer a narrative. The purpose of war is Social Engineering.
The same can be said about 90% (or 99.9999%) of Americans. Our leaders are doing just as bad or worse, and they have since the beginning, and most people scream from the rooftops that "that's not true, and you're a terrible conspiracy theorist for saying it!" People are led by propaganda. It doesn't matter which group you are a part of, you are a propaganda victim, and your beliefs come from some sector of the Controlled Opposition system designed for that purpose. All sides, dancing to a different tune played by the same piper.
The only people complicit, are the ones actually committing the crimes. Unless and until we start naming the people who do the crimes we will never be looking at the right enemy. The people are not any of the common groups we talk about. It's never "the Germans," or "the Russians," or "the Jews," or "the Muslims," or "the Americans," or "the Democrats," etc. It is always, always, ALWAYS a very small group of individuals (the Cabal), who speak with a very loud voice. Until we start naming them, and not the larger groups they use as a shield to hide behind, then they will always escape.
In that case, why don't YOU name the SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS who are the "Cabal?"
Go ahead. Give us a list.
Such people tend to hide in the shadows, for the very purpose of making it hard to specifically identify them.
And if you DO name a specific individual, the next question is "Where is the sauce to PROVE it was THAT person, and what actions did THEY take to make you think badly of them?"
However ...
If we can show, for example, that 60%+ of all violent criminals just so happen to have black skin and male DNA, even though they are only 5%-6% of the total population, then that sets the stage for an important discussion.
If we can show, for example, that the tiny hat club just so happen to follow a religious text that tells them they can do anything (literally) to anyone not in their group, and that explains why they do such things (constantly, for centuries), then it sets the stage for an important discussion.
Is it ALL? No. I can't personally name 100% of the ones it does apply to. And I know there are those it does not apply to.
THAT was my point. If other people cannot distinguish, so what?
But what I can do is point out that there is something DIFFERENT about these people -- GENERALLY. It does not apply to ALL, but it does apply to many.
Did someone ELSE (the "Cabal," perhaps?) indoctrinate them into doing these things?
Maybe. But they STILL do these things, regardless of their reasons.
I doubt that members of the "Cabal" are also the ones sitting in prisons for their violent crimes or the ones wearing the tiny hats to virtue signal their belief in their superiority.
People might be indoctrinated, but they STILL are responsible for their own actions. MOST people do NOT do these things.
These topics are important to discuss, regardless of the rhetoric used to attempt to manipulate people into NOT talking about these topics.
IMO, the person I was responding to was attempting to get people to SHUT UP about any discussion of what some individuals -- usually within certain groups -- tend to do that is harmful to the rest of society.
My impression is that you are doing the same thing. Let's talk about the man behind the curtain rather than the man who robbed the liquor store because the man behind the curtain put him up to it!
No. Let's talk about BOTH.
Just as there is rhetoric to deceive people, there is also rhetoric to censor people.
I object to both.
The "Cabal" is an important topic. However, it is not the ONLY important topic.
If shit rolls downhill, then that means there is shit at the top of the hill, AND at the bottom, as well.
I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out. That was my intent. I could have been more clear.
The real enemy is the Cabal. They use the larger groups as a shield. When you use the shield name, instead of the subgroup name, you give them the victory.
Yes. But why is that the case? The answer is, that the Cabal is using targeted propaganda, laws, and the creation of a subculture designed specifically to create the environment where that happens. That is ALWAYS the answer (or close enough). Using any other name than "the Cabal" misleads away from the real enemy.
Only certain subgroups teach that as a religion, and only certain members of that subgroup believe it as presented, and even among those people, only certain people are aware of the fuckery behind those statements. Only certain people act towards that fuckery. The teachings are a form of propaganda. That propaganda is used as a recruitment tool. Those that are willing to take the next step move up the organizational ladder. It is the people at the top that are the real problem. Some of those on the lower rungs are also a problem. All the rest are simply the people who are victims of the propaganda.
Because it is an association fallacy. Look it up. That's what it is. Worse, it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions. Just because we can't necessarily say "everyone who is involved" doesn't mean we can't recognize the tricks that they use to hide, and stop using those tricks in our own statements which only aids in their advantage.
In WWII the Americans went over to Europe and killed a lot of innocent people (victims of propaganda). Included in those innocent people were many of the Germans, including the Nazis. Most of the Nazis were led around by the same association fallacy that we are here today discussing and that you are promoting. The reason the Americans committed murder in other peoples homes was because they too were led around by propaganda. Are they "responsible for their own actions?" Sure, but how responsible are they? They truly believed they were fighting for "good." SO DID MOST OF THE NAZIS! Instead, they were all different pieces of the Controlled Opposition fighting for the Cabal, doing exactly what they were intended to do to fulfill the Cabal plan. Their actions were evil by all accounts. So how "responsible" are they? Is it intent or action that makes a person evil?
Propaganda, generalization fallacies, all these tools of the Cabal create action through the creation of false belief which creates false intent. Who is really responsible?
Call the enemy who they are, even if you don't know their names. Do not push their false narrative by calling out the groups they use as shields.
Fine, just make sure you understand what the impact of your words will do. I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example. If I start with "the Americans did a bunch of evil shit and should be held responsible" it won't paint a complete picture of what happened. It is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things. Only then can we see how belief guides action, and who creates belief and how. Only then can we really solve the problems, by first seeing who the real enemy is.
I agree wholeheartedly.
Well.... I think it kinda is. My research suggests that all mainstream beliefs have a direct connection to the Cabal. The Cabal runs everything, all sides, through targeted propaganda. If you understand that, nothing else really matters all that much. Nothing would be more uniting for example, than understanding that "the liberals" and "the conservatives" (or pick any two groups in opposition) are both having their entire belief system being run by the Cabal. Nothing would help people focus on the real problems than understanding that the real play of the Cabal is not contained in where the "opposite" groups disagree, but in where they agree; in the areas that no one talks about at all.
If we learn to direct our focus on the real enemy, we win the real war, not the fake one they create to distract us.
But I am NOT using the term loosely. I want to know why YOU don't call out the specific names of the specific individuals.
If you don't believe in speaking about certain GROUPS, then you should not be doing it yourself.
You don't really even know WHO the "Cabal" members are.
Ergo, you can't possibly know which other groups they do or do not also belong to.
You say they are the REAL bad guys that we should shine the light on.
I agree that light should be shined on them, but I do not agree that light should not ALSO be shined on others, who are not necessarily a part of this mysterious "Cabal."
You are saying: Don't talk about X. X is not the real problem. Z is the real problem. So, ONLY talk about Z.
I say: No, both X and Z are problems. Let's talk about BOTH.
I don't give a damn why he murdered some people in a drive-by shooting.
I DO give a damn that HE did IT.
Sure, he was influenced by the bad guys. But he lives in a society where he is ALSO influenced by good guys.
Other people had the same influences and did NOT do what HE did do.
And when "He" is "Them" and "They" are causing problems that other people are not, that is worthy of discussion.
SO. FUCKING. WHAT ???
We can talk about BOTH types of bad people.
YOU want to push CENSORSHIP.
"Don't talk about THESE people. You are ONLY allowed to talk about THOSE people."
Fuck off with that shit.
Until you can tell me the NAMES of the INDIVIDUALS that are the "Cabal," you are guilty of the very thing you accuse me of.
Surely, there must be different levels to the "Cabal." Some are merely foot soldiers who only know things on a "need to know basis."
So you want to refer to the man behind the curtain as the TRUE bad guy, but you DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO THE FUCK THAT IS.
I don't care that there are a lot of people who are influenced by bad people.
Finding out that such a thing even exists is what "AWAKENING" is all about.
First, we have to realize that a problem exists. Then, we might have a shot at solving the problem.
When there are MANY problems, then we talk about ALL the problems, and prioritize, and go from there.
Fine. Tell me WHO those people were.
We know that Balfour (an Englishman) and Rothschild (a jew) were two of the men who did it.
Who else?
You don't fucking KNOW.
All you want to do is talk about a vague "boogeymen" for the purpose of shutting down discussion of larger groups of people who did bad things, as well.
In the case of the Americans who fought the Germans in WW2, from the American side, most of them were drafted. Some volunteered before being drafted, due to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Of course, this was all directed by other people engaged in propaganda -- FDR being among them.
But ...
These people (on both sides) were also in a situation where they were ordered to do something.
If you are a POW prisoner, and a guard hands you a gun with one bullet and tells you to shoot your best friend prisoner in the head, or he will kill you, what do you do?
Is it a moral question to shoot the POW, or shoot the guard (in which case other guards will kill you), or kill yourself, or shoot the bullet into the air (in which case the guards will kill you)?
Is it a MORAL question?
NO!
Once violence has been inserted into the situation (here, the guard is threatening to kill you if you don't do as ordered), then it is no longer a MORAL question.
It is a survival question, and whatever you choose to do is neither moral nor immoral. It is simply your preferred choice in how to handle the situation.
OTOH, a car full of black men do a drive-by shooting out of CHOICE, which DOES make it a moral issue.
Did other people insert gansta rap music and anti-White hatred in their Critical Race Theory schools, and lies about black slavery (black slaves in Africa were captured by other blacks, and sold to jews and Arabs and sold into slavery around the world), and a belief that they had to step up to other blacks who disrespected them, or get revenge if someone steals your drugs?
Yes, all of the above.
But they also live in a society that knows that murder is wrong.
The tiny hat club lives in a society that knows that enslaving women and torturing children is wrong.
They have mutiple influences, and I don't care that they chose the bad influence over the good.
It was their CHOICE.
So, I will talk about those types of choices just as much as the "Cabal" and all the evil they do.
Are MOST of the "Cabal" people also jewish?
I suspect yes, but cannot prove it.
I can look at the fact that 2% of Americans are jewish, but they are 80% of the Biden cabinet, including Myorkas who not only is a jew holding the office that "regulates" illegal migration, but is ALSO a director of the NGO that is the top funder of those illegal immigrants. He is both funding illegal immigration and also using his political office to evade enforcing the law against it.
And most of those jews are NOT the most capable people to hold such offices, so there must be some reason other than merit that got them there.
I look at the Federal Reserve, all the harm it has caused, and find out that it was formed mostly by jews and non-jew puppets of jews.
I look at many, many other similar situations and I can draw some conclusions.
I don't necessarily think that "Harvey the Jew" down the street in the accounting office is conspiring to do evil things, but his religion teaches him to go along with it.
And ALL jews who practice Judaism are influenced by the Talmud, no matter what their personal views are.
We only have generalizations because they TEND to be generally true in a lot of cases -- certainly, a lot more than is true of other races.
How many jews do drive-by shootings? Not many.
How many Japanese work at the central banks (other than in Japan)?
Not many.
I will not be censored just because pointing out certain things make some people uncomfortable. Yes, some people are bad, and there are also OTHER people who are also bad.
Your attempt to claim that ONLY the "Cabal" (whomever that is, even though you don't know) are worthy of criticism is an attempt at censorship.
I reject it.
I explained myself and said I could have been more clear. Now you are just being defensive and obtuse, mischaracterizing my intent even after I made myself clear. Why?
I've actually written a book on who some of them are, and what other groups they belong to, specifically so that people can see the real enemy. So... ya. There is that.
Completely false.
You mistake statements of "we should focus on the real enemy" with actual actions of censorship, which means, active removal of information or ideas, burning books, passing laws to coerce, etc., or promoting any of those actual acts of censorship.
Suggesting what you are suggesting is a categorical error and an outright lie on all possible fronts. It has zero validity whatsoever.
Absolutely, and all levels should be discussed, but if you talk about any one group (except the top) without also talking about the people that push them to do things and how, you miss essential context that paints a false picture. You are promoting methods of painting a false picture; the very methods pushed by the Cabal to hide behind. I am promoting not doing that.
In every case the actions of the Cabal are ESSENTIAL CONTEXT. Any removal of that context is a victory of the Cabal. Talk about anything you want, but if you don't make sure you include that context, the Cabal, and their methods, remain hidden.
Does that absolve them of their actions? In no way does this detract from the case I have made, which was the responsibility inherent in "intent" and "belief" v. "action".
FDR was an agent of the Cabal, and perhaps more important, a puppet.
Talk about whatever you want man, but if you want to make real change and help people see the real enemy it helps to focus on the real enemy and their actions, rather than use the group that The Cabal set up to act as a shield for them to hide behind.
By not including all the context of the Cabal, you pain a false picture. You commit a "context dropping" fallacy.
Agreed, BUT, if you do not include the context of the propaganda that leads these groups around, and the system that is created to retain compliance and mislead away from the propaganda pushers, then you paint a false picture, the exact one you are intended to paint, as designed by the Cabal.
I am trying to show you how you are doing exactly what the Cabal wants you to do by using these association fallacies, and not including the actions of the Cabal within the discussion.
I suggest you look up the word "censorship" then look up the word "argument" (presentation of evidence and logic in debate). They are quite different, yet you use them as if they were the same. Not once did I suggest nor even slightly imply you should be stopped from speaking.
By (grossly) redefining a word you seem to be suggesting that I shouldn't be allowed to disagree with you... that I shouldn't be allowed to say what I am saying...
Sounds a bit like "hate speech must be censored" to me.
Hatred is wrong and spewing hatred is wrong so you stop.
If you are incapable of hating evil, then you are also incapable of loving good.
Good and evil exist. You cannot love them both, because if you do, you don't love either.
I do hate evil. Never said I didnât.
You said hatred is wrong.
Now, you say it is right.
Make up your mind.
You didnât say Rothschild. Your statement was Jews. Peopleâs hatred doesnât bother me unless it it dispersed like a shotgun blast. Jesus said He hated the doctrines of the Nicolaitanes. He is better than us because he can separate the deed from the person. We simply canât. Maybe someday we will be able to.
Khazars.
wisdom
Well, I never been called that before! KEK
Wow. Eye opener.
Any chance you have a list like this for the slave ships and plantation owners?
If you want an eye-opening experience, go look up a book titled "The Jewish Onslaught" by Tony Martin.
He documents who the slave ship owners were.
Go to the Amazon "comments section."
First, sort the comments so you only see the 1-star comments.
Then, sort for only the 5-star comments.
Compare the level of "discussion" between the two.
You will see that one side has thoughtful -- even perhaps educated -- replies. The other side has nothing but childish behavior.
I have read that the slave auctions in America were shut down on jewish holidays because the jews who ran the auctions took the time off for their holidays.
Why are we taught something VERY different in the government-controlled schools?
Whatâs the best way to not lose to a being who is more powerful than you?
Turn that which he most loves, and which he has promised not to destroy, to be on your side fighting against him, slandering his good name and works so that the cost of Justice is too great. If not they themselves, create false accusation against them so that they are also perceived as targets.
In other words, try to force a stalemate.
They have been doing this for a long time, but the wheat will be separated from the tares.
Those comments are definitely interesting.
All in good time ...
Not that I have come across yet, but that would be something interesting to look into.
I saw some images once, but I want the source records, and where to find the legal copies, not just something someone wrote down. Authenticity matters.
Will see if I can find the images though, may be a decent starting place.
Hey hey, starting places. Maybe I should not be lazy on it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews_and_the_American_Slave_Trade_(book)
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1995/09/slavery-and-the-jews/376462/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_slave_ships
More than 80% of the evil demonic bastards that worked with Lenin to overthrow the government of Russia, turn the country into a communist hellhole, and murder millions of people were jews. Most of the top officials in Lenin's and Stalin's dictatorships were jews, and some of them were responsible for the worst atrocities against their own countrymen. These communist jews were responsible for far more murders than the 6 million number we hear about over and over in connection with every occasion the jews have ever been persecuted. They've done a good job of hiding this fact, to the point that very few people in the world today know about it.
And when the going got tough, they came to the US and became what is known as neocons.
But in fact they have always been here & originated from here.
Lev Bronstein and his buddies in NYC 120 years ago.
Lev Bronstein (aka Leon Trotsky) lived in NYC and was supposedly a poor, jewish boy.
Yet, he was caught crossing into Canada with $10,000 in gold -- in 1917 -- on his way to Russia for the overthrow. A call came in from London to the Canadian authorities, and he was released.
Clearly, he was funded.
Wow! A post about the Jewish contributions to the Chinese revolution and yet nobody has brought up the subject of the Kaifeng Jews, which the European explorer Marco Polo wrote about in 1286. During his 17 years in China he noticed that Jews had a noticeable amount of political influence, and this was back in the13th century. .
From that website:
Interesting. That is the same time period as the Khazars near southern Russia.
Jews have been behind it the whole time.
Karl Marx was a jew. But he did not originate communism. He was just the front man.
"The Hidden History of Communism" --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twEWYTvX3lQ
Communism was created by the same people who ran the Illuminati, to be a counter ideology for controlled opposition. It was being planned long before Marx.
Jewish bankers in New York and London financed the Japan-Russian War to get rid of the Russian Tsar in 1904, while at the same time attempting a coup d'etat in Russia in 1905. That failed.
They tried again with WW1 in Europe and also an overthrow of Russia in 1917. That one succeeded.
What did both attempts have in common?
"Wall Street Funded the Bolshevik Revolution" --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaFklTLNy8c
Putin himself said that the first Soviet government was run by 80%+ jews.
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3o9qwl?syndication=273844
After WW2, they turned their attention onto China. Then, Cuba. Then, Venezuela, Then, the UK and USA.
Yes it true that the first Soviet government was run by 80% Jews.
In a total of 545 members the Bolshevist adminis- tration comprizes.
447 Jews
30 Russians
34 Letts
22 Armenians
12 Germans
3 Finns
2 Poles
1Georgian
1 Czech
1 Hungarian
Interesting that the "Russian Revolution" only had 30 Russians in charge of the new government, out of 553. That's only 5%.
But 60,000,000 Russians and Ukrainians were murdered by this new government.
And the high schools are never taught any of this.
Weird, huh?
There is a reason why this was never taught in school.
THOSE WHO DON'T LEARN FROM HISTORY ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT.
THOSE WHO PREVENT HISTORY FROM BEING TAUGHT "INTEND" TO REPEAT IT.
Much of the content taught in public schools is of course controlled by the jews.
In 1989 Robert Maxwell a confirmed (MOSSAD agent/Khazarian Jew) father of Ghislaine, merged his publishing company with McGraw-Hill textbook publishing. Has mossad been in control of what Americans are learning via the teachers union and textbook publishing?
"McGraw Hill is an American publishing company for educational content, software, and services for pre-K through postgraduate education. It is one of the "big three" educational publishers along with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and Pearson Education. The company also publishes reference and trade publications for medicine, business, and engineering."
"In 1989, McGraw-Hill formed a joint partnership with Robert Maxwell, forming second largest textbook publisher in the United States. McGraw-Hill took full ownership of the venture in 1993."
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/McGraw_Hill_Education
The picture gets more and more clear every day.
Not denying this isn't true, but how does one go about independent verification? I was always taught that Russia was run by Russians, now I see someone saying J*ws were actually running it? These two beliefs do not add up. I so hate our public schools for not teaching history accurately, but I don't blame the clueless teachers, only those who WROTE THE TEXTBOOKS.
Some things are intentionally hidden and suppressed.
So, how do we figure out what the truth is?
I have found the best way to get at what is LIKELY the truth (we might never have 100% certainty, and we have to accept that) is to look at two sides of a debate:
Side A says THIS.
Side B says THAT.
Ok, first off, do both arguments make sense, or is one of them kinda not making sense?
But we have to go deeper than that.
So next, does Side A have a coherent and logical rebuttal to Side B's THAT? Does Side B have a coherent and logical rebuttal to Side A's THIS?
Finally, can either side rebut the rebuttal? Can either side provide either evidence or a logical argument (sometimes, evidence is lacking) to (a) support their opinion, (b) provide a rebuttal to the other side's opinion, and (c) provide a rebuttal to the other side's rebuttal?
When you get into both sides of the argument, you ALMOST ALWAYS find that one side or the other doesn't really have anything to back up their claims and cannot provide a coherent rebuttal.
This is WHY they resort to name-calling and censorship. It is ALL they have.
And that is how you know they lie, or at least do not really know what they are talking about.
ALSO:
The "Russian Revolution" was not a revolution of Russians. It was an overthrow by jews, funded by wealthy jews in NYC and London.
But ... WHY would they want to do this?
Clearly, they wanted to overthrow the Russian Tsar. First, they tried in 1904 by funding the Japanese in a war against Russia. That didn't work, and they then drew Russia into WW1 to distract them from internal affairs. That is when Lenin and Trotsky were sent to Moscow for the coup d'etat.
But ... WHY?
I can only speculate, but I suspect that the jews have had a many-centuries hatred of Russia because Russia defeated the Khazarian Empire more than 1,000 years ago, which was just to the south of Russia.
I suspect it was (and still is) a vendetta.
From Wiki on Leon Trotsky (leader of the "Russian Revolution"):
Uh-huh ...
Thank you for the most useful and thought provoking post I've seen around here in years! China was conquered long ago and hasn't been governed by its own people for a very long time.
Any recommendations for other resources on the subject?
Thanks for taking the time to read it over. I know are some other links. Ill look around and get back to you here shortly.
There would be no communism anywhere if it wasn't for the Ashkenazis.
Slightly off topic but if you look at that recent "communist protest" video posted, there are Jews in the group. Nothing to see here.
During ww2 the OSS sent the bulk of the ammo and war supplies to the commies,even tho the nationalist we doing most of the fighting. They even lied to congress about this. Then they made sure they got most of the stuff the surrendering Japanese had.
These leftists are shit. Jews like Javier Millei, me, Wayne Allen Root, Steven Miller, Dennis Prager, and a host of other Jews on our side agree.
LOL
Amazing info, Ehjax.
Thanks Fren. When I came across it, I was happy to share because it hard finding such detailed information on the Jews and their hand in creating Chinese communism. I have known for some time they were involved but not to which extent.
Oustanding work OP. The occupation of Japan had a similar story.
Oy vey shut it down.