Trump doesn't know the Constitution?? GTFO, you treasonous freak!
Whenever I hear liberal idiots try and talk like they know the Constitution, I always ask them, "What is the Third Amendment of the Constitution". It's a 'deer in the headlights' stare every single time.
The Third Amendment to the United States Constitution is a part of the Bill of Rights and addresses the quartering of soldiers in private homes. Here is the text of the Third Amendment:
"No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
This amendment was included in response to the grievances colonists had with the British government, particularly with the Quartering Acts passed by the British Parliament in the 1760s and 1770s. These acts allowed British soldiers to lodge in private homes, which many colonists found to be an intrusion on their privacy and rights.
The Third Amendment, while one of the least litigated parts of the Constitution, is significant because it reflects the Founders' commitment to protecting individual rights and liberties against government overreach, even in scenarios involving national defense and military necessity.
I wonder if the government spying on us in our homes through our electronics would be a violation of the 4th amendment. It is, essentially, stationing their agent in our home.
Yes, President Trump is aware and has read the Constitution, and why he did not forcefully releash the J6 hostages, until it was done legally. If he was a dictator as that dunce MSNBC host, and rest of your party claim he is, he would have done so.
So rich her clinging to immunity when they're trying to throw the book at Trump for having classified docs (which had been declassified) and for requesting a delay of the 2020 vote certification. All of which the constitution and the SCOTUS upheld.
Only while Congress is in session and only for official capacity. Was the J6 committee considered their official capacity and was Congress in session at that time?
I don't think people here are aware of how particular and restrictive the crime of treason is. Treason is the only crime defined in the U.S. Constitution. According to Article III, Section 3:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congresswoman is referring to Article I, Section 6. I will not quote it in total as anyone really interested can look it up. I will point out that it does not grant **immunity **to any member for commission of a crime.
The second sentence does provide that except for Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, they are privileged from Arrest during Attendance at the Session of their respective House, and in going to and returning from the same. The terms Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace cover most crimes that carry substantial prison sentences and for those they can be arrested even during an active session. For any other crime they can be arrested after returning from the session.
The last part of the second sentence does provide that for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place. Since the First Amendment prohibits Congress from making any law abridging the freedom of speech, such activity can not be classified as a crime thus the only protection given by this provision is from civil action.
The bottom line is that if any Congress Critter commits a crime, they are liable the same as one of us mere mortals.
I would be scared as well if I made a career out of stealing, lying and God only knows what other dispiscable things she and others have done. Eventually, its time to pay the piper.
They always assume Trump is an ignorant imbecile who's not read up on what he's doing, has no power of calculus or discernment, and is simply flying by the seat of his pants like a manic lunatic. This is of course projection.
And it bites them in the gonads every single time. He ALWAYS outwits them and ends up being totally right. Yet they never learn.
"Honey, nobody is immune to the crime of TREASON.
The panic is real."
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1841952785203396609/vid/avc1/1306x720/Zn485rFTF7Z815a-.mp4
sure saves me some clicks by you providing a backup link and all , thanks your some kind of machine.
yep, ENEMY COMBATANTS get free, one-way trip to GITMO, KEK!
Trump doesn't know the Constitution?? GTFO, you treasonous freak!
Whenever I hear liberal idiots try and talk like they know the Constitution, I always ask them, "What is the Third Amendment of the Constitution". It's a 'deer in the headlights' stare every single time.
The Third Amendment to the United States Constitution is a part of the Bill of Rights and addresses the quartering of soldiers in private homes. Here is the text of the Third Amendment:
"No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
This amendment was included in response to the grievances colonists had with the British government, particularly with the Quartering Acts passed by the British Parliament in the 1760s and 1770s. These acts allowed British soldiers to lodge in private homes, which many colonists found to be an intrusion on their privacy and rights.
The Third Amendment, while one of the least litigated parts of the Constitution, is significant because it reflects the Founders' commitment to protecting individual rights and liberties against government overreach, even in scenarios involving national defense and military necessity.
I wonder if the government spying on us in our homes through our electronics would be a violation of the 4th amendment. It is, essentially, stationing their agent in our home.
If they are, then it is.
Isn't that the one that says Free No-Limit Insider Trading for Congress? Yeah. I think that's the one.
Fraud vitiates everything.
Not for Treason? She is wrong.
She is wrong even if it wasn't treason.
Yes, President Trump is aware and has read the Constitution, and why he did not forcefully releash the J6 hostages, until it was done legally. If he was a dictator as that dunce MSNBC host, and rest of your party claim he is, he would have done so.
Do away with immunity for out right lies, fabrication and complicity to do harm.
J6 cmtr wasn't the house floor and it also wasn't official
So rich her clinging to immunity when they're trying to throw the book at Trump for having classified docs (which had been declassified) and for requesting a delay of the 2020 vote certification. All of which the constitution and the SCOTUS upheld.
They're hypocrisy knows no bounds. Lock her UP!
I can't wait to see this bitch in cuffs. What had happened Zoe?
She's whistling past the graveyard. And so are the "dozens of legal experts."
Damn I would bet "she" is really a he and an ugly one at that, yikes.😬
Funny when commie cunts quote the constitution...
Bitch you're fucked... and not the good kind because you're uglier than homemade sin.
They better not leave the walls of Congress. “immune…while in their official capacity.” That doesn’t count when Congress is not in session.
We'll be sure to write that on your rope at Gitmo.
"Thinks she was immune to prosecution for her treason".
Seems to have put a lot of thought into this subject
lol. whatever happened to " no one is above the law " ?
Thats what she thinks.
Only while Congress is in session and only for official capacity. Was the J6 committee considered their official capacity and was Congress in session at that time?
But wasn't the committee illegal as it was not bipartisan?????? So, no immunity for that loser!
She wishes...
I don't think people here are aware of how particular and restrictive the crime of treason is. Treason is the only crime defined in the U.S. Constitution. According to Article III, Section 3:
The Congresswoman is referring to Article I, Section 6. I will not quote it in total as anyone really interested can look it up. I will point out that it does not grant **immunity **to any member for commission of a crime.
The second sentence does provide that except for Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, they are privileged from Arrest during Attendance at the Session of their respective House, and in going to and returning from the same. The terms Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace cover most crimes that carry substantial prison sentences and for those they can be arrested even during an active session. For any other crime they can be arrested after returning from the session.
The last part of the second sentence does provide that for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place. Since the First Amendment prohibits Congress from making any law abridging the freedom of speech, such activity can not be classified as a crime thus the only protection given by this provision is from civil action.
The bottom line is that if any Congress Critter commits a crime, they are liable the same as one of us mere mortals.
except during adjournment....
Yes, adjournment!!!!!
Smug commie! I hope she gets it real good!
I would be scared as well if I made a career out of stealing, lying and God only knows what other dispiscable things she and others have done. Eventually, its time to pay the piper.
They always assume Trump is an ignorant imbecile who's not read up on what he's doing, has no power of calculus or discernment, and is simply flying by the seat of his pants like a manic lunatic. This is of course projection.
And it bites them in the gonads every single time. He ALWAYS outwits them and ends up being totally right. Yet they never learn.
What's that definition of insanity again? Qeq
Hey now, I thought nobody was above the LAW? What a loser....
Not for corruption; see Melendez and Cunningham.
Oh CONgres is immune but not The President.
Got it.
Keep thinking that, will make it easier to put cuffs on u later.